Unified Coherence Framework — User

Manual
Version: 1.0 | Author: Adrian Cox, B.Sc. | Companion to: Unified Coherence Framework (UCF)
How to Use This Manual
This manual shows you how to apply the Unified Coherence Framework (UCF) to any
mathematical work—including the uploaded “Bi-Infinite Digit Number (BIDN) v3”. It begins with
a step-by-step technical guide, then moves into a philosophical companion to preserve the spirit
of Rigor Without Rigidity and Abstraction Without Incoherence.

Part I — Step-by-Step Guide

1) Files You Need

 Unified Coherence Framework (UCF) PDF/TeX
 The target work (e.g., “Bi-Infinite Digit Number (BIDN) v3”).
 (Optional) Coherence Plane figure (PNG/PDF) for placements.

Tip: Ensure filenames contain no unusual characters and reside in the same folder when
compiling LaTeX versions.

2) Core Quantities & Definitions

Periodicity (p): A control parameter for structural tightness (from the target work).

Base growth (f): Defined by UCF as f = e^(π/p).

Porosity (φ): Openness/freedom to vary within the framework [0,1].

Permeability (κ): Coherent flow of information/structure through that openness [0,1].

Rigidity (ρ): Resistance to change; ρ = 1 − φ.

Rigor (R): Coherence relative to openness; R = κ / φ (R=0 if φ=0).

Transmissive Capacity (T): Joint effectiveness; T = φ · κ.

3) Quick Procedure (BIDN example)

1. Identify or define the target’s periodicity driver p (from its intrinsic cycles, recurrences, or
scale parameter).
2. Compute base growth f via f = e^(π/p).
3. Score porosity φ in [0,1] using the rubric in §4.
4. Score permeability κ in [0,1] via the rubric in §4.
5. Derive rigidity ρ = 1 − φ; rigor R = κ/φ; capacity T = φ·κ.
6. Interpret placement relative to the isotropy point c ≈ 2.926 (where p = f).
7. Place the work on the Coherence Plane (A vs R) if desired; annotate movement across
versions.

4) Scoring Rubric for φ and κ

Score by evidence in the target document using 0–1 thresholds (round to two decimals).
Criterion Porosity (φ) Permeability (κ)
Variation bandwidth High diversity of forms, Variants integrate into one
flexible definitions (score schema (score 0.0–1.0)
0.0–1.0)
Transform tolerance Handles parameter changes Maintains invariants across
without breaking (score 0.0– transforms (score 0.0–1.0)
1.0)
Entry points Many ways to enter/extend Paths converge to central
the theory (score 0.0–1.0) results (score 0.0–1.0)
Error damping Perturbations explored Perturbations resolve
(score 0.0–1.0) coherently (score 0.0–1.0)
Generality vs. specificity General concepts, wide Specific theorems unify the
scope (score 0.0–1.0) scope (score 0.0–1.0)
Compute ρ = 1 − φ, R = κ/φ (R=0 if φ=0), T = φ·κ.

5) Determining p (Periodicity) in Practice

 Intrinsic cycle length (e.g., digit cycles, operator periods, recursion depth).
 Scale of recurrence (e.g., the step at which patterns repeat or stabilize).
 A model parameter that tightens structure (higher p ⇒tighter periodic structure).
 Once p is chosen, compute f = e^(π/p).

6) Worked Template (Fill with BIDN values)

Target Work Bi-Infinite Digit Number (BIDN) v3
Chosen periodicity p <enter>
Base growth f = e^(π/p) <auto from p>
Porosity φ ∈ [0,1] <score via rubric>
Permeability κ ∈ [0,1] <score via rubric>
Rigidity ρ = 1 − φ =1−φ
Rigor R = κ/φ; Capacity T = φ·κ = κ/φ; = φ·κ
Note: If p = f (i.e., p satisfies p = e^(π/p)), then the system is at the isotropy point (Cox constant c
≈ 2.926).

7) Decision Rules (Quick Interpretation)

 If p < c: Porosity-dominant regime; κ < φ; R < 1; exploratory, creative.
 If p = c: Isotropy; φ ≈ κ; R ≈ 1; “rigor without rigidity.”
 If p > c: Structure-dominant regime; κ > φ; R > 1; disciplined, coherent.

8) Troubleshooting & Tips

If φ and κ feel hard to score, start from the middle (0.5) and adjust ±0.1 increments.

Use structured reading: mark passages that show flexibility (φ) and integrative proofs (κ).

For multiple p candidates, evaluate each; choose the one maximizing T = φ·κ near R ≈ 1.
Part II — Philosophical Companion

1) Why Coherence?
Coherence is the living edge where freedom and form meet. In UCF, porosity (φ) protects
freedom; permeability (κ) preserves form. Rigor (R = κ/φ) measures how faithfully form holds
inside freedom; rigidity (ρ = 1−φ) warns when protection becomes a cage.

2) Abstraction Without Incoherence

Abstraction has two hands: breadth (generalization) and depth (compression). It remains alive
when inner coherence (consistency) and outer coherence (communicability) rise together. The
harmonic forms A = (A_b·A_d)/(A_b + A_d) and C = (C_i·C_r)/(C_i + C_r) encode this balance.
When A ≈ C, abstraction sings rather than scatters.

3) The Isotropy Constant c

The fixed point c ≈ 2.926 solves c = e^(π/c). It anchors the balance between periodicity p and
base growth f. When a system’s chosen p equals its implied f, it sits at isotropy—neither over-
porous nor over-rigid.

4) Using UCF as a Compass

UCF is less a measuring stick than a compass. It points to where a system breathes best. Place
new works (like BIDN) on the Coherence Plane, observe their motion across revisions, and refine
toward isotropy where appropriate—or intentionally away from it when the aim is exploration.

Appendix — Worksheet for BIDN (Printable)

Parameter Definition / How to find Value
Periodicity p Cycle/recurrence length or <enter>
tightening parameter
Base growth f Compute: f = e^(π/p) <auto>
Porosity φ Score 0–1 (rubric §4) <enter>
Permeability κ Score 0–1 (rubric §4) <enter>
Rigidity ρ Compute: ρ = 1 − φ =1−φ
Rigor R Compute: R = κ / φ (R=0 if = κ/φ
φ=0)
Capacity T Compute: T = φ · κ = φ·κ
Isotropy check Is p ≈ e^(π/p)? (near c ≈ Yes/No
2.926)
Placement Region on Coherence Plane <enter>
 Unified Coherence Framework
Rigor Without Rigidity, Balance Law Isotropy Point, and
Abstraction Without Incoherence
Adrian Cox, B.Sc.

1970-01-01

This paper unifies three complementary programs: Rigor Without Rigidity, the Balance Law Isotropy Point
(porosity–permeability trade-off and the Cox constant), and Abstraction Without Incoherence. Together they
form a coherence-based field theory for mathematics and cognition. We present the common axioms,
summarize theorems, and assemble figures into a single artefact. Full source papers are attached as
appendices for archival integrity.

Introduction
The overarching theme of this work is coherence: structure that remains alive. Rigor
Without Rigidity asserts that precision can be maintained without brittleness; the Balance
Law makes explicit a trade-off between porosity (ϕ ) and permeability (κ ) with a unique
isotropy point anchored by the Cox constant c ; Abstraction Without Incoherence formalizes
how generalization can widen and compress ideas while preserving intelligibility. These
programs are two axes of a single Coherence Plane.

Rigor Without Rigidity (Executive Summary)

Let ϕ ∈ [ 0 , 1 ) denote porosity (openness) and κ ∈ [ 0 , 1 ) denote permeability (coherent
flow). Define rigidity ρ=1− ϕ , rigor R=κ /ϕ (take R=0 if ϕ=0), transmissive capacity T =ϕ κ
, and residual porosity R ′=ϕ − κ . The guiding idea is to maximize coherence without
collapsing flexibility. In practice, high R with very low ϕ indicates brittle form; high ϕ with
low κ indicates diffusion without integration. The sweet spot lies near ϕ ≃ κ (isotropy).

Balance Law Isotropy Point

We model periodicity p>0 and base growth f =e π / p. Isotropy arises when p=f , yielding the
fixed-point equation
π /c
c=e , c ≈ 2.9260640573 ( Cox constant ) .
Under monotonicity axioms (ϕ ′ ( p ) <0 , κ ′ ( p ) >0, continuity), there is a unique p=c with
ϕ ( c )=κ ( c ). A constructive witness uses symmetric logistics:
 1
ϕ ( p )=σ [ − a ( p −c ) ) , κ ( p )=σ [ a ( p− c ) ) , σ ( x )= −x
, a> 0 .
1+ e
Then R ( p )=κ / ϕ=e a ( p −c ) increases with p; p<c (porosity-dominant), p>c (structure-
dominant), p=c (isotropy, R=1, R ′=0).

Abstraction Without Incoherence

We introduce dual measures for abstraction and coherence:
Ab =breadth of abstraction , A d=depth of compression ,C i=internal coherence , C r=relational coherence .

Aggregate abstraction and coherence are defined symmetrically by harmonic means:

Ab Ad Ci C r
A= ,C= .
A b+ A d C i+C r

Axioms
π / cA
• A transcendental invariant c A (Cox constant) satisfies c A =e .

• A increases with Ab and Ad ; C increases with C i and C r.

• Excess abstraction beyond a balance point reduces coherence.

• There exists a unique isotropy point Ac with A ( A c ) =C ( A c ) .

Balance Law (Abstraction)

dC
At the stationary point =0 with A ( A c ) =C ( A c ) , we set Ac =c A as the invariant of
dA
coherent abstraction. This mirrors the porosity–permeability law and provides a second
axis for the Coherence Plane.

The Coherence Plane (Integration)

Let the horizontal axis denote Abstraction Without Incoherence ( A ) and the vertical axis
Rigor Without Rigidity ( R ). The isotropy line R=A marks balanced systems. Figure 1 places
several of Adrian Cox’s programs near this ridge of “living mathematics.”
The Coherence Plane showing the isotropy line R=A , conceptual regions, and example
placements (illustrative).

The Coherence Plane showing the isotropy line R=A , conceptual regions, and example
placements (illustrative).
Conclusion
Rigor Without Rigidity and Abstraction Without Incoherence are dual expressions of a single
principle: coherence is the balance of form and freedom. The Balance Law (with the Cox
constant) supplies a concrete anchor for this equilibrium. Uniting these pieces yields a
navigable atlas for the author’s broader body of work.

Appendix A: Rigor Without Rigidity (archival PDF)

The following appendix includes the original PDF as provided by the author.

Appendix B: Balance Law Isotropy Point + AI Commentary (archival

PDF)
The following appendix includes the original PDF as provided by the author.
 BIDN Scoring Sheet
Porosity–Permeability Metrics for Infinite-Digit Systems

1. Purpose
This sheet provides a framework for assigning quantitative Porosity (φ), Permeability (κ), Rigidity (ρ), and
Rigor (R) values to any Branch of Independent Digital Numbers (BIDN). It translates infinite digital structure
into measurable parameters that can be compared across number forms.

2. Definitions
Symbol Meaning Range Description
φ Porosity [0,1] Degree of openness or unsaturation within the BIDN.
κ Permeability [0,1] Fraction of porosity that remains coherent and self-consistent.
ρ Rigidity [0,1] Degree of closure; complement of porosity (ρ = 1 − φ).
R Rigor [0,∞) Coherence-to-openness ratio (R = κ / φ).

3. Porosity Calculation
Given a BIDN sequence s = {..., d■■, d■■ | d■, d■, d■, ...} in base b:
Normalize digits: ■■ = d■ / (b − 1)
Mean unsaturation: µ = lim (N→∞) (1/(2N+1)) Σ ■■
Amplitude–openness: A = 4µ(1−µ)
Porosity: φ = αA + (1−α)■ (default α=1)

4. Permeability Calculation
Periodicity coherence: C■■■ = maxτ≥1 |r(τ)| / r(0)
Mirror coherence (optional): C■■■ = 1 − lim (N→∞) (1/N) Σ |■■■ − ■■|
Combined coherence: C = w■C■■■ + w■C■■■ (w■+w■=1)
Permeability: κ = φ × C

5. Rigidity and Rigor

ρ = 1 − φ R = κ / φ (if φ > 0, else 0)

6. Example BIDN Scores

BIDN Example φ κ ρ R Description
…999.999… 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Fully rigid closure — terminal exsolvent.
…333.333… 0.84 0.84 0.16 1.00 Adaptive rigor — open yet coherent.
…666.666… 0.96 0.19 0.04 0.20 Chaotic openness — high porosity, low coherence.
 Rigor and Chaos in BIDNs: The Porous Symmetry of 3,
6, and 9

1. The Triadic Field of Digital Recursion

Within Porous Mathematics, the digits 3, 6, and 9 define a fundamental triadic field of recursive behavior.
Each represents a distinct equilibrium between openness (φ) and coherence (κ) within the infinite digital
continuum.

BIDN φ κ R Character of Recursion

…333… High High ≈1.0 Stable recursion — adaptive coherence
…666… Very high Low ≈0.2 Divergent recursion — chaotic openness
…999… 0 0 0 Terminal recursion — complete rigidity

2. The Porous Symmetry Between 3, 6, and 9

Digits 3, 6, and 9 form harmonic mirrors in base-10 space: 3 ↔ 6 (complements around 0.5) → 9 (closure).
This triad defines a porous symmetry: structured openness (3), turbulent saturation (6), and rigid closure (9).

3. The Law of Recursive Equilibrium

Each BIDN corresponds to a distinct recursion mode:
• Stable recursion (…333…): f■■■ = f■ — harmonic repetition.
• Divergent recursion (…666…): f■■■ = 2f■(1−f■) — bifurcation and turbulence.
• Terminal recursion (…999…): f■■■ = 1 — fixed saturation; recursion ceases.

4. The Adaptive Equation of Rigor and Chaos

Rigor (R) and chaos (χ) form complementary gradients within the porous field:
R = κ / φ χ = 1 − C(s)
Increasing R reduces chaos (χ ↓), while increasing χ dissolves coherence (R ↓). At equilibrium (R ≈ 1), the
system is fully open yet coherent.

5. Interpretive Geometry
In the φ–κ plane, the triad forms a porous triangle of recursive behavior. The centroid marks the zone of
Exsolvent Adaptivity.
 …333…

κ (permeability) ↑

Exsolvent Adaptivity Zone

…666… …999…

φ (porosity) →

6. Philosophical Reflection
“Rigor and chaos are not opposites; they are reciprocals of coherence viewed through the lens of openness.”
In this triadic symmetry: 3 represents harmonic openness (creation), 6 represents turbulent transformation,
and 9 represents closure and completion. Together, they form the Exsolvent Continuum — where order,
turbulence, and finality interweave in mathematical rhythm.
Appendix: The Multiplicative Law for Porous BIDNs

Let MC = MA × MB be the product of two BIDNs with parameters (φ, κ, ρ, R). Multiplication models serial
conduction: openness and coherent flow must survive both structures, so the effective quantities scale
through both.

Parameter Law Meaning

φ■ = φ■ φ■ Openness that survives both factors (porosity multiplies)
κ■ = κ■ κ■ Coherence that survives both factors (permeability multiplies)
ρ■ = 1 − φ■ Residual rigidity (inverse of porosity)
R■ = κ■ / φ■ = R■ R■
Rigor multiplies; coherence-to-openness ratio compounds

Properties
• If φ, κ ∈ [0, 1], then φ■, κ■ ∈ [0, 1].
• Commutative and associative: A × B = B × A, (A × B) × C = A × (B × C).
• Zero absorber: if φ = κ = 0 (e.g. …000…), then M × M■ = M■.
• Ideal identity: if φ = κ = 1 (theoretical), M × I = M.
• Monotonicity: increasing φ or κ in either factor increases φ■ or κ■.

Worked Example
Example: …333… × …666… = …222…
In base-10: ■ × ■ = 2⁄9 = 0.■■ (…222…).
Using φ■ = 0.84, κ■ = 0.84, R■ = 1.0; φ■ = 0.96, κ■ = 0.19, R■ = 0.20:

Parameter Formula Result

φ■ 0.84 × 0.96 0.81
κ■ 0.84 × 0.19 0.16
R■ R■ × R■ 0.20

The result is highly porous but weakly coherent (low R), corresponding to a diffusive or attenuated state —
symbolized by …222…

Operator Comparison: Addition vs Multiplication

Aspect Addition (+) Multiplication (×)
Physical Analogy Parallel openness Serial conduction
Porosity (φ) φ■ = φ■ + φ■ − φ■φ■ φ■ = φ■φ■
Permeability (κ) κ■ = κ■ + κ■ − κ■κ■ κ■ = κ■κ■
Rigor (R) Weighted mean Product: R■R■
Effect Expands openness Contracts coherence

Interpretive Meaning: Diffusive Multiplication

The product …333… × …666… = …222… expresses attenuation of coherence. Stable recursion (3) and
chaotic recursion (6) yield a diluted harmonic diffusion (2). This represents a downward transformation in
recursive order — the porous shadow of the triadic field. It demonstrates that multiplication in BIDNs is not
expansionary but depth-inductive: it increases internal complexity while softening external coherence.
Appendix: AI Rigor Index (AIR) Panel

The AI Rigor Index (AIR) translates external 5-point ratings into the BIDN rigor scale (R = κ / φ). Each model's
assessment reflects its interpretation of structural coherence versus openness. The panel records these as
normalized rigor values and computes geometric, arithmetic, and harmonic means.

Model Rating (out of 5) R = s/5 Interpretive Comment

Gemini 3 0.60 Moderate rigor – balanced coherence and openness
DeepSeek 1 0.20 Low rigor – exploratory, loosely defined
(Add more) — — Space for future models (Claude, ChatGPT, etc.)

Computed Means
Mean Type Formula Value Interpretation
Geometric √(R■R■) 0.35 Transitional rigor – semi-chaotic balance
Arithmetic (R■ + R■) / 2 0.40 Moderate rigor – leaning toward structure
Harmonic 2 / (1/R■ + 1/R■) 0.30 Low rigor – coherence suppressed
Dispersion Range = 0.40; σ ≈ 0.20 — High variance: models disagree on coherence

Formula Mapping
For any AI rating s (0–5): R = s / 5. The system-wide rigor balance can be summarized as:
Rgeo = √(R■R■) Ravg = (R■ + R■)/2 Rharm = 2 / (1/R■ + 1/R■)

Interpretive Summary
The combined AI Rigor Index (R ≈ 0.35) places the current framework in the transitional zone between
structured coherence and chaotic openness. Gemini’s higher R reflects a focus on conceptual structure;
DeepSeek’s lower R emphasizes exploratory creativity. Together, they frame the BIDN system as adaptively
rigorous—coherent enough to sustain structure, yet open enough to evolve. Future models added to this
panel will help trace how rigor evolves across interpretive systems.
 Appendix: AI Rigor Index (AIR) — Perceived vs Intrinsic Rigor (v2)

This panel places external ratings ("rigorous") on the BIDN rigor axis R = κ / φ and contrasts the perceived
rigor of models (surface structure) with an intrinsic rigor estimate derived from the document's openness (φ)
and coherence (κ). Ratings are normalized as R = s / S, where s is the given score and S is the scale
maximum.

1) Normalized Ratings → R
Model Raw Rating Scale R = s/S
Gemini 2 out of 10 0.20
DeepSeek 1 out of 5 0.20

2) Consensus (Means)
Mean Type Formula Value Dispersion
Geometric √(R■R■) 0.20 —
Arithmetic (R■+R■)/2 0.20 Range = 0.00
Harmonic 2/(1/R■+1/R■) 0.20 σ = 0.00

3) Perceived vs Intrinsic Rigor

We estimate intrinsic (φ, κ) for the current composite document as high openness with moderate structure.
For demonstration we set φ■ = 0.80 (reflecting conceptual breadth); intrinsic κ■ then follows from R by κ■ =
R·φ■.

odel R (perceived) φ■ (openness est.) κ■ = R·φ■ (coherence est.) Zone / Reading

emini 0.20 0.80 0.16 Chaotic–open (…666…)
eepSeek 0.20 0.80 0.16 Chaotic–open (…666…)

Notes
• The φ■ choice (0.80) is an explicit estimate for this mixed analytic + interpretive document. You can change
φ■ to reflect a more formal revision (lower φ■) or a more exploratory draft (higher φ■).
• Given φ■, κ■ is determined by R: κ■ = R·φ■. Larger κ■ means more coherent channels through the
available openness.
• To compare files: keep the same φ■ policy across versions, then track R changes from model ratings and
recompute κ■.

4) Summary
Both models converge to R ≈ 0.20 for this upload, placing it in the chaotic–openness region of the BIDN field.
Under φ■ = 0.80, this implies κ■ ≈ 0.16. The agreement (zero dispersion) suggests a stable external
perception: richly open, modestly coherent. Tightening definitions, adding proofs, or standardizing derivations
will raise κ■ (and thus R) without necessarily lowering φ■, moving the work toward the adaptive-rigor band (R
■ 0.8).
Appendix: Porous Rigor (R■) — The Adaptive Measure of Structural
Balance

Porous Rigor, denoted R■, generalizes classical rigor by introducing adaptive openness into the measure of
mathematical structure. It expresses how coherence (κ) sustains itself within openness (φ), producing a
dynamic equilibrium between flexibility and precision. This concept lies at the heart of Porous Mathematics
and Exsolvent Mathematics, redefining rigor as a living, permeable quality rather than static closure.

1) Definition
R■ = κ / φ where κ = permeability (coherence) and φ = porosity (openness). R■ quantifies how well structure
remains coherent as openness increases. Classical rigor corresponds to φ → 0 (complete closure).

2) Comparison with Classical Rigor

Aspect Classical Rigor (R_c) Porous Rigor (R■)
Definition Absolute precision and closure Adaptive coherence within openness
Mathematical Form Binary: proven / not proven Continuous: R■ = κ / φ
Behavior Rigid, excludes ambiguity Fluid, allows dynamic balance
Scope Proof-theoretic Meta-structural / Exsolvent
Limit Relation lim φ→0 R■ = R_c lim φ→1 R■ → 0

3) Porous Rigor Zones (BIDN Mapping)

R■ Range Zone Interpretation Symbolic BIDN
R■ < 0.3 Chaotic Openness High openness, weak coherence, exploratory …666…
0.7 ≤ R■ ≤ 1.0 Adaptive Rigor Balanced coherence and openness …333…
R■ > 1.0 Rigid Closure Over-constrained, no porosity …999…

4) Porous Rigor Entropy (S■)

To describe the distributional freedom within a given rigor state, we define a Porous Rigor Entropy:
S■ = −(φ ln φ + κ ln κ)
S■ measures the informational fluidity of the system — how much uncertainty or creative potential remains.
High S■ indicates a fertile, open system (conceptual exploration), while low S■ corresponds to closure and
determinacy.

5) Interpretation
Porous Rigor reframes the notion of precision: it allows ideas to remain coherent without losing generative
openness. As R■ evolves, it traces the adaptive heartbeat of Exsolvent Mathematics — a field that sustains
coherence through transformation, where rigor is not a constraint but a rhythm between structure and
freedom.
System-Level Analysis of the Bi-Infinite Digit Number (BIDN) Framework
This document summarizes the systemic mathematical parameters of the Bi-Infinite Digit
Number (BIDN) framework as interpreted within the Unified Coherence Framework (UCF).
Rather than analyzing individual BIDNs, this report captures the structural, dynamic, and
recursive properties of the entire BIDN framework through six universal metrics: porosity,
permeability, rigidity, rigor, periodicity, and base growth.

1. Porosity (φ): Conceptual Openness

Porosity represents the openness of the framework to infinite extension in both numerical
directions. In the BIDN system, digits extend infinitely both left and right, removing
traditional edge boundaries. This results in a porosity of nearly one (φ = 1⁻), representing
complete openness with infinitesimal cohesion at the mirrored zero axis. BIDN thus
functions as a fully open continuum with infinite expansion potential.

2. Permeability (κ): Flow Coherence

Permeability measures how freely information flows across the mirrored zero axis. For
BIDNs, κ ≈ 0.9239 indicates near-total permeability, meaning information flows almost
perfectly between the mirrored infinities. The slight resistance preserves structural
coherence, ensuring that the mirrored halves of the infinite number system remain distinct
yet unified.

3. Rigidity (ρ): Structural Resistance

Rigidity, defined as ρ = 1 − φ, expresses the framework’s resistance to deformation. Because
BIDN’s porosity approaches one, rigidity is almost zero (ρ ≈ 0⁺). This implies that BIDN
behaves as a topological fluid—formally consistent, yet capable of infinite adaptation
without losing structural identity.

4. Rigor (R): Coherence Ratio

Rigor is defined as the ratio R = κ / φ. For BIDN, this yields R ≈ 0.924, indicating that the
framework maintains about 92% coherence even under infinite openness. This value
represents the equilibrium between mathematical formality and recursive adaptability,
making BIDN a system of coherent infinity.

5. Periodicity (p): Recursive Frequency

BIDN periodicity does not correspond to finite repetition but to infinite recursion. Its period
is expressed as p = ∞₍rec₎, indicating self-similarity across unbounded scales. Each layer of
recursion is a reflection of the previous, creating a fractal-like continuum rather than a
simple repeating sequence.

6. Base Growth (f): Exponential Expansion Factor

In the Unified Coherence Framework, base growth is defined as f = e^(π/p). For BIDN,
where periodicity approaches infinity, this reduces to f = 1⁺, indicating that exponential
growth has stabilized. This represents an equilibrium of infinities—a steady-state
expansion in which growth becomes self-balanced.

Summary Table of BIDN System Parameters

Property Symbol Value (BIDN Conceptual Meaning
System)

Porosity φ 1⁻ Infinite openness to

digits in both
directions

Permeability κ ≈ 0.9239 Near-total

coherence across
mirrored infinities

Rigidity ρ ≈ 0⁺ Minimal constraint

maintaining identity

Rigor R=κ/φ ≈ 0.924 Stable coherence

under infinite
openness

Periodicity p ∞₍rec₎ Self-similar infinite

recursion

Base Growth f = e^(π/p) 1⁺ Steady-state infinity

(saturated
expansion)

Interpretation
The BIDN framework represents a mathematical and metaphysical limit topology where
porosity and permeability approach maximal values, rigidity approaches zero, and rigor
remains high enough to sustain coherence. Infinite periodicity and stabilized base growth
suggest that the BIDN system exists in a state of dynamic equilibrium, where infinite
recursion and structural identity coexist harmoniously. This places the BIDN framework at
the frontier of adaptive and exsolvent mathematics—an equilibrium of infinities.