0% found this document useful (0 votes)
1 views1 page

Fog Node Comparison Summary

The document compares three fog node devices for smart agriculture: Raspberry Pi 4 Model B, NVIDIA Jetson Nano, and Intel NUC. It recommends the Raspberry Pi 4 Model B for its balance of performance, energy efficiency, and cost, along with reliable connectivity options and low power consumption. The document highlights the advantages of community support for troubleshooting and development in remote deployments.

Uploaded by

ammu2004aj
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
1 views1 page

Fog Node Comparison Summary

The document compares three fog node devices for smart agriculture: Raspberry Pi 4 Model B, NVIDIA Jetson Nano, and Intel NUC. It recommends the Raspberry Pi 4 Model B for its balance of performance, energy efficiency, and cost, along with reliable connectivity options and low power consumption. The document highlights the advantages of community support for troubleshooting and development in remote deployments.

Uploaded by

ammu2004aj
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Comparison of Fog Node Devices for Smart Agriculture

Device CPU Memory Connectivity Energy Cost


Efficiency
Raspberry Pi Quad-core 2GB/4GB/ Wi-Fi, Moderate $35–$75
4 Model B Cortex-A72 8GB Bluetooth, (~3W idle,
1.5GHz LPDDR4 Ethernet ~6W under
load)
NVIDIA Quad-core 4GB Gigabit Moderate $99
Jetson Nano ARM Cortex- LPDDR4 Ethernet, (~5-10W
A57 USB 3.0 depending
on load)
Intel NUC Intel Celeron 4GB–8GB Wi-Fi, Lower (~10- $150–$250
(Entry Dual Core DDR4 Bluetooth, 20W)
Level) Ethernet,
USB 3.0

Recommendation
For a smart agriculture system, the Raspberry Pi 4 Model B is the best option. It offers a
good balance between performance, energy efficiency, and cost. Its support for Wi-Fi and
Bluetooth ensures reliable connectivity in field conditions, and its low power consumption
is ideal for deployment in remote areas powered by solar energy. Additionally, the wide
community support makes troubleshooting and development more accessible.

You might also like