PASL Artifact Exemplars: Longitudinal Data (Task 1)
Improving Second Grade Oral Reading Fluency
2nd Grade End-of-Year Reading Levels – 3 Year Data Comparison
2019-20 End-of-Year Reading Levels
Level Level Level Level Level Level Level Level Level Total
10 12 14 16 18 24 28 30 32 Students
Teacher A 1 0 0 3 2 2 10 2 1 21
Teacher B 0 0 2 0 3 2 11 0 2 20
FA E
Teacher C 0 0 1 2 1 5 10 3 0 22
Teacher D 0 0 1 3 2 7 7 1 0 21
Total #
TI PL 1 0 4 8 8 16 38 6 3 84
CT
Total # Students Below-Level = 37 (44%) Total # On-Level or Above = 47
2020-21 End-of-Year Reading Levels
AR M
Level Level Level Level Level Level Level Level Level Total
10 12 14 16 18 24 28 30 32 Students
Teacher A 0 1 0 3 2 4 7 1 1 19
Teacher B 0 0 2 0 3 7 8 0 1 21
SA
Teacher C 1 0 0 0 0 5 11 2 2 21
Teacher D 0 0 0 0 1 7 9 1 1 19
Total # 1 1 2 3 6 23 35 4 5 80
Total # Students Below-Level = 36 (45%) Total # On-Level or Above = 44
2021-22 End-of-Year Reading Levels
Level Level Level Level Level Level Level Level Level Total
10 12 14 16 18 24 28 30 32 Students
Teacher A 0 0 1 2 2 5 9 2 1 22
Teacher B 0 0 1 0 2 5 10 1 2 21
Teacher C 1 0 0 1 1 7 9 2 1 22
Teacher D 0 0 2 0 1 5 12 1 0 21
Total # 1 0 4 3 6 22 40 6 4 86
Total # Students Below-Level = 38 (42%) Total # On-Level or Above = 50
Copyright 2023 LCM, LLC in conjunction with ESC Region 13.
1
This exemplar is meant to provide an example for PASL candidates and may not in any circumstances be submitted as original content.