0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views155 pages

16719

Uploaded by

biggimirec8587
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views155 pages

16719

Uploaded by

biggimirec8587
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

General principles of law and international due

process : principles and norms applicable in


transnational disputes 1st Edition Charles T. Kotuby
Jr. digital download

Purchase at textbookfull.com
( 4.8/5.0 ★ | 425 downloads )

https://textbookfull.com/product/general-principles-of-law-and-
international-due-process-principles-and-norms-applicable-in-
transnational-disputes-1st-edition-charles-t-kotuby-jr/
General principles of law and international due process :
principles and norms applicable in transnational disputes
1st Edition Charles T. Kotuby Jr.

TEXTBOOK

Available Formats

■ PDF eBook Study Guide Ebook

EXCLUSIVE 2025 ACADEMIC EDITION – LIMITED RELEASE

Available Instantly Access Library


More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...

International Law in Disaster Scenarios: Applicable


Rules and Principles Flavia Zorzi Giustiniani

https://textbookfull.com/product/international-law-in-disaster-
scenarios-applicable-rules-and-principles-flavia-zorzi-
giustiniani/

Principles of International Economic Law Matthias


Herdegen

https://textbookfull.com/product/principles-of-international-
economic-law-matthias-herdegen/

Due process of law beyond the state : requirements of


administrative procedure 1st Edition Della Cananea

https://textbookfull.com/product/due-process-of-law-beyond-the-
state-requirements-of-administrative-procedure-1st-edition-della-
cananea/

Schwartz’s Principles of Surgery F. Charles Brunicardi

https://textbookfull.com/product/schwartzs-principles-of-surgery-
f-charles-brunicardi/
Oncologic Emergency Medicine Principles and Practice
Knox H Todd Editor Charles R Thomas Jr Editor Kumar
Alagappan Editor

https://textbookfull.com/product/oncologic-emergency-medicine-
principles-and-practice-knox-h-todd-editor-charles-r-thomas-jr-
editor-kumar-alagappan-editor/

Applicable law in investor state arbitration the


interplay between national and international law 1st
Edition Hege Elisabeth Kjos

https://textbookfull.com/product/applicable-law-in-investor-
state-arbitration-the-interplay-between-national-and-
international-law-1st-edition-hege-elisabeth-kjos/

General Radiography-Principles and Practices 1st


Edition Christopher M. Hayre (Editor)

https://textbookfull.com/product/general-radiography-principles-
and-practices-1st-edition-christopher-m-hayre-editor/

Forensic toxicology : principles and concepts 1st


Edition Nicholas T Lappas

https://textbookfull.com/product/forensic-toxicology-principles-
and-concepts-1st-edition-nicholas-t-lappas/

Transnational Commercial and Consumer Law: Current


Trends in International Business Law Toshiyuki Kono

https://textbookfull.com/product/transnational-commercial-and-
consumer-law-current-trends-in-international-business-law-
toshiyuki-kono/
1
i

General Principles
of Law and
International Due
Process
ii

CILE Studies
Series Editor: Ronald A. Brand
CILE Studies is a series of monographs and edited volumes dedicated to the
discussion of important issues and developments in public and private international law.
Each volume is selected on the basis of its contribution to the literature with the objective to
provide lasting commentary and innovative analysis.

Potential authors may contact:


Center for International Legal Education
University of Pittsburgh School of Law
Barco Law Building
3900 Forbes Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
U.S.A.
Phone: 412-​6 48-​7023
fax: 412-​6 48-​2648
email: [email protected]

Volumes 1 and 2 are available directly from the Center for International Legal Education
at the above address. Volume 3 and later volumes can be ordered from
Oxford University Press by visiting their website at: www.oup.com.

The Series
Volume 1
The Draft UNCITRAL Digest and Beyond: Cases, Analysis and
Unresolved Issues in the U.N. Sales Convention,
(Franco Ferrari, Harry M. Flechtner, and Ronald A. Brand, editors)

Volume 2
Private Law, Private International Law, and Judicial Cooperation
in the EU-​US Relationship,
(Ronald A. Brand, editor)

Volume 3
Forum Non Conveniens—​History, Global Practice, and Future Under the Hague Convention on
Choice of Court Agreements,
(Ronald A. Brand and Scott R. Jablonski)

Volume 4
Drafting Contracts Under the CISG,
(Harry M. Flechtner, Ronald A. Brand, Mark S. Walter, editors)

Volume 5
Conflicts in a Conflict: A Conflict of Laws Case Study on Israel
and the Palestinian Territories,
(Michael Karayanni)

Volume 6
General Principles of Law and International Due Process: Principles and Norms
Applicable in Transnational Disputes,
(Charles T. Kotuby Jr. and Luke A. Sobota)
iii

General Principles
of Law and
International Due
Process
Principles and Norms Applicable
in Transnational Disputes

Charles T. Kotuby Jr. and Luke A. Sobota

1
General Principles of Law and International Due Process. Charles T. Kotuby Jr. and
Luke A. Sobota. © Oxford University Press 2017. Published 2017 by Oxford University Press.
iv

1
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s
objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered
trademark of Oxford University Press in the UK and certain other countries.

Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press


198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America.

© Oxford University Press 2017


All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or
transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press,
or as expressly permitted by law, by license, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reproduction rights
organization. Inquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights
Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above.

You must not circulate this work in any other form


and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer.

Library of Congress Cataloging-​in-​Publication Data


Names: Kotuby, Charles T., Jr, author. | Sobota, Luke A., author.
Title: General principles of law and international due process : principles and norms applicable
in transnational disputes /​Charles T. Kotuby Jr. and Luke A. Sobota.
Description: New York : Oxford University Press, 2017. | Series: CILE studies; v. 6 |
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Identifiers: LCCN 2016015294 | ISBN 9780190642709 ((hardback) : alk. paper)
Subjects: LCSH: Rule of law. | Due process of law. | International law.
Classification: LCC K3171 .K67 2017 | DDC 340/​.11—​dc23 LC record available at
https://​lccn.loc.gov/​2016015294

1 3 5 7 9 8 6 4 2

Printed by Sheridan Books, Inc., United States of America

Note to Readers
This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject
matter covered. It is based upon sources believed to be accurate and reliable and is intended to be current as
of the time it was written. It is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal,
accounting, or other professional services. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services
of a competent professional person should be sought. Also, to confirm that the information has not been affected
or changed by recent developments, traditional legal research techniques should be used, including checking
primary sources where appropriate.

(Based on the Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the


American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations.)

You may order this or any other Oxford University Press publication
by visiting the Oxford University Press website at www.oup.com.
v

For Rebecca, Elizabeth, Thatcher, and Olivia Kotuby

and Anna, Jack, Elsa, and Jane Sobota.


vi
vii

Contents

Foreword by Stephen M. Schwebel. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ix


Preface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xi
Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xv
Glossary of Latin Terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xvii

Chapter 1: An Introduction to the General


Principles of Law and International Due
Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
A. The Origin and Evolution of the General Principles of Law. . . . . 3
1. Identifying General Principles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
a) Principles That Are General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
b) Principles That Are Universal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
c) Principles That Are International . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
2. Typical Usage of General Principles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
3. Invocations of General Principles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
a) Arbitral Tribunals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
b) National Courts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
B. The Origin and Evolution of International Due Process . . . . . . 54
1. A Process Grounded in General Principles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
2. The Concept of International Due Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
3. Specific Invocations of International Due Process . . . . . . . . . . 74
a) Arbitral Tribunals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
b) National Courts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79

Chapter 2: Modern Applications of the General


Principles of Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
A. Good Faith in Contractual Relations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88
1. Pacta Sunt Servanda: Agreements Must Be Honored . . . . . . . 89
2. Good Faith in Excusing Contractual Performance ����������������� 101
3. Good Faith as a Factor in Remedying Nonperformance . . . . 105
B. Abuse of Rights and the Principle of Proportionality ������������� 107
1. The General Prohibition on the Abuse of Rights . . . . . . . . . . . 108
2. The Principle of Proportionality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114
viii

Contents

C. Estoppel ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������119
D. The Prohibition on Advantageous Wrongs and Unjust
Enrichment ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 130
E. Corporate Separateness and Limited Liability ������������������������� 140
F. The Principles of Causation and Reparation ������������������������������143
G. The Principles of Responsibility and Fault ����������������������������������151

Chapter 3: Modern Applications of the


Principles of International Due Process ������������157
A. Notice and Jurisdiction ����������������������������������������������������������������� 158
B. Judicial Impartiality and Judicial Independence ��������������������� 165
C. Procedural Equality and the Right to Be Heard ������������������������176
D. Condemnation of Fraud and Corruption ����������������������������������� 183
E. Evidence and Burdens of Proof ����������������������������������������������������� 190
F. The Principle of Res Judicata ��������������������������������������������������������� 197

Epilogue ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 203

Annex of Cases ����������������������������������������������������������������������211

Name Index��������������������������������������������������������������������������������273

Subject Index �������������������������������������������������������������������������� 275

viii General Principles of Law and International Due Process


ix

Foreword

Hersch Lauterpacht’s extraordinary career in international law was launched in


1927 with the publication of Private Law Sources and Analogies of International
Law. The Author’s Preface noted “the fact that general principles of law, rec-
ognized by civilised States and adopted by customary and conventional inter-
national law as a source of decision in international disputes, are for the most
part identical with generally recognized principles of private law.” Lauterpacht
continued:
The adoption, in Article 38(3) of the Statute of the Permanent Court of
International Justice, of “general principles of law recognized by civilised
States” as a binding—​although, it seems, only supplementary—​source of
decision in the judicial settlement of international disputes signifies that
that practice, hitherto unsupported by universal and authoritative inter-
national enactment, and regarded by many as derogating from the strictly
judicial character of international arbitration, has now received formal
approval on the part of practically the whole international community.
There lies the outstanding and, to a certain, extent, revolutionary contri-
bution made by the Statute to international law as a whole. This book is,
in a sense, a commentary on Article 38(3) of the Statute and a respect-
ful acknowledgment of the great service rendered to the cause of interna-
tional law by the Committee of Jurists assembled in 1920 at The Hague. As
a result of earnest and prolonged discussions, they arrived at a compro-
mise which honours equally the representatives of both Continental and
British-​American jurisprudence, and places the judicial function of the
Court upon a solid foundation.*

* At pages viii–​i x. Much of Lauterpacht’s scholarship, not only in that book but in others, was an elabo-
ration of this theme. When he so prematurely died in 1960 at the age of 63, he had edited four editions
of Oppenheim’s classic treatise on International Law. His distinguished son, Sir Elihu Lauterpacht,
recounts, in the first of five volumes of his father’s Collected Papers, that his father prepared 364 type-
written pages that were to be the introductory section of the ninth edition of Oppenheim, meant to be
later incorporated in a textbook of his own. In a section on “The basis of the validity of general prin-
ciples of law,” Judge Sir Hersch Lauterpacht expands upon the place of general principles in terms of
exceptional interest. 1 Hersch Lauterpacht, International Law, Collected Papers, General
Works 75–​77 (E. Lauterpacht ed., 1970).

General Principles of Law and International Due Process ix


x

Foreword

Why did Lauterpacht characterize the Statute’s provision on general principles


of law as its outstanding and revolutionary contribution to international law as a
whole? Because it interred the hitherto dominant positivist contention that inter-
national law consisted solely of treaties and of customary international law estab-
lished by State practice. Henceforth international decisions could confidently
draw on the general principles of law as a source of international law.

In 1953, Bin Cheng published his seminal book examining the contents of
salient general principles of law. As the authors of the present work observe, this
book is an update of Cheng’s. It carries Cheng onward and upward, especially
in light of the fact that the number of arbitration awards that invoke general
principles of law has increased with the advent of the International Centre for
Settlement of Investment Disputes and the conclusion of some 3,000 bilateral
investment treaties, as well as a trio of important multilateral treaties (NAFTA,
CAFTA, and the Energy Charter Treaty) that enable foreign investors directly
to require States to arbitrate disputes between them. Investor/​State arbitra-
tion has ballooned, while international arbitration between States carries on.
Moreover, although the World Court—​an unofficial term that embraces the
Permanent Court of International Justice and the International Court of Justice
that replaced it—​is much busier the last 35 years than before, it is no longer the
only international court. There is today a high tide of international adjudication
and arbitration, higher than ever before in the history of international law and
relations. Recourse to general principles of law is a significant element of that
high tide. Whether the tide will recede is unclear. Investor/​State arbitration is
currently the object of disproportionate and uninformed criticism that portends
the regressive rather than the progressive development of international law.

This book makes a signal contribution to the progressive development of inter-


national law by its searching study of the place of general principles of law in
contemporary international arbitration and their relationship to due process of
law in international and national proceedings. It proceeds to expound the par-
ticulars of salient general principles in depth. It does so with scholarship, insight,
and panache.

The authors, Chuck Kotuby and Luke Sobota, who are leading international
counsel and advocates, have written a book that will be of genuine use to adjudi-
cators, advocates, and scholars.

—​Stephen M. Schwebel

x General Principles of Law and International Due Process


xi

Preface

From the signing of treaties at Alcáçovas in 1479, Tordesillas in 1494, and


Westphalia in 1648, state practice as manifested in conventions and custom
served as the primary source of international law. The law of nations regulated
inter-​state relations, but little more. That began to change near the turn of the
twentieth century. The creation of ad hoc claims commissions to adjudicate pri-
vate claims under international law indicated the need for a more comprehensive
system of international law. Efforts such as the Hague Conferences of 1899 and
1907 and the Geneva Conventions of 1906 and 1929 led to the dawn of “human
rights” under international law, and with it the codification of certain principles
and norms that comprised the emerging system of international justice.

Notable among these advancements was Article 38 of the 1920 Statute of the
Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ), which defined “international
law” to include not only “custom” and “convention” between States but also “the
general principles of law recognized by civilized nations” within their municipal
legal systems. The architects of the post–​World War I system sought to supple-
ment the loose bundle of customary state practices with a repository of basic
principles capable of regulating the myriad issues arising from international
intercourse.

The “general principles” were seen as a necessary link between the developed sys-
tems of municipal law and the inchoate system of international justice. They pro-
vided a positive law footing upon which a system of international justice could
function and a means to bind parties to basic juridical concepts to which no one
could object, even if they had not been codified in the “law of nations.” By design,
this was not natural law or equity, to which the earlier claims commissions had
resorted, but the determination that certain concrete legal principles obtaining in
virtually all legal systems should also apply in the emerging international system.
It was believed that a legal principle common to domestic legal systems across
the globe would have the legitimacy and clarity to serve as a binding source of
international law.

General Principles of Law and International Due Process xi


xii

Preface

That belief solidified in 1945 when Article 38 was, with minor alteration, reiter-
ated in the Statute of the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Shortly thereaf-
ter, Bin Cheng of University College London wrote his seminal book, General
Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals. Published
in 1953, the monograph sets out, in a descriptive rather than normative man-
ner, five categories of substantive legal concepts recognized around the world.
Notions such as pacta sunt servanda and nemo auditur propriam turpitudinem
allegans are among these principles, often expressed in Latin maxims deriving
from Roman law to demonstrate pedigree, permanence, and universality. Such
substantive principles, which can provide a rule of decision for a particular con-
troversy, join a set of core procedural requirements that are “simple and basic
enough to describe the judicial processes of civilized nations”—​what has been
dubbed “the international concept of due process.” The requirement of nemo
debet esse iudex in propria sua causa and the principle of res judicata are funda-
ments of the procedural norms found in most judicial systems. Induced from the
positive law of countries around the world, these general principles and proce-
dural norms create a legal baseline for international law. They are meant not to
define a rule of law, but rather the rule of law.

As originally conceived, these principles were primarily intended to amelio-


rate the non liquet of international relations among States, as there was little
else on the international plane at that time. Private claims for denial of justice
had waned and, with few exceptions, ad hoc claims commissions ceased to be
a central feature in the development of international law. During the quarter
century following World War II, apart from the invocation of general principles
in some oil concession arbitrations, the ICJ proved to be the main engine for the
continued development of the general principles. But its caseload of sovereign
disputes—​ranging from maritime and territorial claims to issues of diplomacy
and wartime conflict—​called chiefly for the explication of custom and conven-
tion; the relevance of general principles of national law and minimum norms of
due process was limited. The ICJ judges overseeing such sensitive and politicized
disputes, moreover, may have been reluctant to rely too heavily upon unwrit-
ten substantive principles lest they be accused of expanding the scope of their
jurisdiction. The invocation of the general principles identified by Cheng ebbed
during this time.

This has all changed. The ICJ today is no longer the only institution on the inter-
national stage and international law is no longer reserved for state-​to-​state dis-
putes. With the growth of bilateral investment treaties and other international

xii General Principles of Law and International Due Process


xiii

Preface

conventions promoting and protecting global commerce, private parties may now
directly seek redress for violations of international law before institutions such as
the International Center for the Settlement of Investment Disputes, which issued
its first arbitral award in 1977. In this context, general principles can serve as sub-
stantive guarantees for the rights of private parties vis-​à-​vis each other and even
foreign States, be it by guiding the application of governing law or defining what
is “fair and equitable” for foreign investments. Domestic courts have also been
called upon to apply international law with greater frequency, such as in deciding
whether to recognize a foreign judgment or arbitral award, or in applying cross-​
border legislation such as the U.S. Alien Tort Statute.

The importance of international law has increased along with the number of
venues applying it. Yet lacunae and ambiguities persist. In some cases, the law
governing a particular issue may not be clear—​a manifestation of the dualism of
international and municipal law. In other cases, the governing law may be silent
on a particular issue or may not readily apply to the situation presented. For these
and various other reasons, courts and tribunals frequently invoke general princi-
ples and procedures found in municipal law. This, in turn, has served to elucidate
their application in international law—​not necessarily creating new principles,
but affirming, clarifying, and applying those long established. Cheng’s 1953 work
is now among the most cited authorities in international arbitration.

Although the general principles are, by definition, basic and even rudimentary,
they hold vital importance for the rule of law in international relations. This is no
mean task. Reliable application of even the most abecedarian principles of due
process remains elusive in scores of judicial systems. Despite being set quite low,
the baseline standards for international conduct often go unmet. Greater adher-
ence to general principles by both private and sovereign entities would mark
a significant improvement on the status quo. States have successfully invoked
the general principle of nullus commodum capere potest de sua iniuria propria
to resist investment-​treaty claims brought upon contracts procured by fraud;
foreign companies and individuals have had international tribunals denounce
domestic court processes marred by irregularities, bias, and external pressure.
With tangible consequences for noncompliance, the guarantee of “international
due process” becomes a real fixture in the law that inures to the benefit of all.

The chapters that follow summarize general principles of law and norms of inter-
national due process in the modern context, with a particular focus on the devel-
opments in the 60-​odd years since Cheng’s writing. This is not a comparative

General Principles of Law and International Due Process xiii


xiv

Preface

exercise based upon country-​by-​country surveys. Like Cheng’s work, it relies


upon the courts, tribunals, and governmental and nongovernmental organiza-
tions that have mined the laws of various judicial systems and identified core
and common principles. It attempts to capture the articulation and invocation
of these principles in various settings. This work diverges from Cheng’s in one
important sense: he primarily studied the general principles that govern sovereign
interaction; this book is largely dedicated to the general principles of law applied
to private conduct, including the substantive principles relating to state interac-
tion with private parties and the procedural norms governing the adjudication
of disputes arising from this interaction. The difference in focus is a reflection of
how the system of international justice has evolved over the past half-​century.

Chapter 1 discusses the history and genesis of general principles of law and norms
of international due process as a source of international law, and the practical
application of these principles and norms in various national and international
fora. Chapters 2 and 3 undertake a substantive review of how the general princi-
ples identified by Cheng, both substantive and procedural, have been understood
and applied in subsequent cases and scholarly work. The aim is to produce a
practical resource for jurists, advocates, and scholars—to collect these principles
and norms in a single volume and attempt to distill their meaning in light of their
development and application throughout the world.

xiv General Principles of Law and International Due Process


xv

Acknowledgments

This book would not have been possible without the generous support and coun-
sel of numerous arbitrators, scholars, and advocates. We would like to specially
thank Judge Stephen Schwebel, Professor Ronald A. Brand, Thomas F. “Tim”
Cullen, Jan Paulsson, Rahim Maloo, and David Weiss. With the disclaimer that
all errors and omissions are our own, we would like to recognize the meticulous
research and thoughtful editing of James Egerton-​Vernon, Kiran Gore, Agustin
Sanz, Ryan Mellske, Anastasiya Ugale, Eldy Roché, Hugh Carlson, Lindsay
Reimschussel, Maria Pradilla Picas, Tammy Pilgrim, Caroline Edsall, Stephen
Morrison, Lauren Beebe, Elizabeth Kiernan, William Sullivan, and Mehreen
Imtiaz. Kelly Renehan, Alexis Sacasas, and Tendai Mukau provided tireless and
invaluable assistance in preparing the manuscript.

General Principles of Law and International Due Process xv


xvi
xvii

Glossary of Latin Terms

Latin Phrase English Translation


ad impossibilia nemo tenetur no one is held to the impossible
actori incumbit onus probandi the burden of proof belongs to the
proponent
allegans contraria non est audiendus a person making contradictory
statements is not to be heard
audi alteram partem listen to the other side
audiatur et altera pars may the other side also be heard
clausula rebus sic stantibus binding so long as circumstances
remain the same
coram non iudice not before a judge
damnum emergens direct damages
ex aequo et bono from equity and goodness
ex dolo malo non oritur actio an action at law does not arise from
grave deceit
ex re sed non ex nomine look at the parties’ acts rather than
legal form
ex turpi causa non oritur actio an action does not arise from a
loathsome cause
exceptio inadimplenti contractus affirmative defense in the case of an
unfulfilled contract
expressio unius est exclusio alterius the express statement of one is the
exclusion of the other
extra compromisum arbiter nihil the arbitrator cannot do anything
facere potest outside the agreement
fraus omnia corrumpit fraud corrupts all
in dubio pro reo when in doubt, in favor of the
defendant
iura novit curia the court knows the law

General Principles of Law and International Due Process xvii


xviii

Glossary of Latin Terms

Latin Phrase English Translation


ius commune common law
ius gentium law of nations
jure causa proxima non remota the proximate cause rather than the
inspicitur remote one is to be looked to
lucrum cessans lost profits
malitis non est indulgendum malice is not be indulged
nemini dolos suus prodesse debet no one can profit from his own wrongs
nemo auditur propriam no one is to be heard relying on his
­turpitudinem allegans own turpitude
nemo contra factum suum venire no one may argue contrary to her own
potest actions
nemo debet esse iudex in propria sua no one should be the judge in his own
causa case
nemo iudex in causa sua no one shall be the judge in her own
case
non bis in idem not twice for the same thing
non liquet it is unclear
nullus commodum capere potest de no advantage may be gained from one’s
sua iniuria propria own wrong
omnia praesumuntur rite esse acta all things are presumed to have been
done according to the right form
pacta sunt servanda agreements are to be observed
petitum claim
quod omnes tangit ab omnibus what touches all should be approved by
approbari debet all
restitutio in integrum full restitution
ubi ius ibi remedium est wherever there is a right, there is a
remedy
ut res magis valeat quam pereat let the thing have effect rather than
perish
venire contra factum proprium to come against one’s own fact is not
allowed
vis major unpreventable event (force majeure)

xviii General Principles of Law and International Due Process


1

CHAPTER 1

An Introduction to the
General Principles of Law
and International Due
Process
As Wine and Oyl are Imported to us from abroad: so must ripe
Understanding, and many civil Vertues, be imported into our minds from
Forreign Writings, and examples of best Ages, we shall else miscarry still,
and come short in attempts of any great Enterprise.
—​John Milton1

The general principles of law can broadly be subdivided into two catego-
ries: (1) those that regulate substantive conduct, and therefore apply to both
private parties and States, and (2) norms that regulate the exercise of sovereign
or adjudicative powers, and therefore apply only to States and international tri-
bunals. The first generally provide rules of decision that govern the conduct of
persons and entities vis-​à-​vis each other. Whether sovereign, corporate, or indi-
vidual, all are obligated to respect their contracts, act in good faith, and refrain
from taking advantage of their own wrong—​to name just a few. In contrast, the
second category generally prescribes the process that is owed to all individuals
before the law, whether that law is administered by a sovereign court or an inter-
national arbitral tribunal. These are the general principles of due process. When
reduced to a common denominator of process that must obtain in any civilized
legal system, this set of principles represents the core concept of “international
due process.”

1 The Character of the Long Parliament (1681), reprinted in XVIII The Works of John Milton 254
(1938).
General Principles of Law and International Due Process. Charles T. Kotuby Jr. and
Luke A. Sobota. © Oxford University Press 2017. Published 2017 by Oxford University Press.
2

General Principles of Law and International Due Process

Despite being codified almost a century ago as a source of international law, the
general principles of law remain somewhat tenuous and remote, with extensive
discourse over their proper derivation, identification, and application. The first
purpose of this chapter is to trace the origins of general principles, from their early
usage alongside concepts of natural law and equity to their positive footing in
municipal law and their eventual inclusion in the organic Statutes of the Permanent
Court of International Justice (PCIJ) and the International Court of Justice (ICJ).
As discussed in Subchapter A, general principles primarily derive from common-
alities of positive law in domestic legal orders around the world. Products of “inter-
national consensus,” general principles embody “universal standards and rules of
conduct that must always be applied.”2 Faced with parties from different legal and
cultural traditions, a national judge, international court, or arbitral tribunal can
revert to foundational principles that are steeped in, and enjoy the imprimatur
of, the municipal laws of various States. Although general principles can operate
independently to provide a rule of decision, courts and tribunals routinely resort
to them as interpretive guides, definitional tools, or corrective fail-​safes, especially
when application of other sources of international law yields non liquet or when
the strict application of domestic law yields an anomalous result.

The choice of substantive law is not the only challenge for the international legal
order. The process by which an international dispute is resolved can also raise
important issues of fairness and justice, and it is here that the precepts of interna-
tional due process take hold. The second purpose of this chapter is to observe the
incorporation of national concepts of due process into international law. As explored
in Subchapter B, many of the same general principles explicated by Bin Cheng in
1953 cumulatively define the international minimum standard of treatment guar-
anteed to all litigants appearing before courts of law. In investment arbitration cases
brought to address alleged denials of justice, the international standards provide
the parameters of what sort of process will pass muster from a universal perspec-
tive. They play a similar role in cases implicating the treaty guarantees of “effec-
tive means” and “fair and equitable treatment” when the conduct at issue involves
adjudicative acts. National courts, too, have occasion to assess the procedural and
substantive adequacy of foreign decisions and arbitral awards when they are asked
to recognize and enforce them as their own. These courts typically evaluate the pro-
priety of a foreign adjudication by measuring it against international, rather than
parochial, standards of due process. The case law arising from this process itself
reveals an accepted and legitimate definition of international justice.

2 Inceysa Vallisoletana S.L. v. Republic of El Salvador, ICSID Case No. ARB/​03/​26, Award, ¶¶ 226–​27
(Aug. 2, 2006).

2 General Principles of Law and International Due Process


3

Chapter 1: Introduction

Although general principles of law have long been the subject of theoretical
debate, the varied fora and circumstances where these principles and pro-
cesses have been and continue to be applied cannot be denied. As a recognized
source of “international law,” general principles have been invoked pursuant
to Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, which calls
for “any relevant rules of international law applicable in relations between the
parties” to be taken into account in treaty interpretation. They have also been
applied under Article 42 of the Convention on the Settlement of Investment
Disputes Between States and Nationals of Other States (ICSID Convention),
which provides for ICSID tribunals, in the absence of a choice-​of-​law provi-
sion, to apply domestic law and “such rules of international law as may be
applicable.” The International Law Commission has recognized in its Model
Rules on Arbitral Procedure general principles as a source of law applicable in
the “absence of any agreement between the parties concerning the law to be
applied.”3

A system of international adjudication without concepts such as good faith,


estoppel, or procedural equality would not long survive, and the myriad appli-
cations of the general principles—​both implicit and explicit—​attest to the vital
position they hold in the international juridical order. As Cheng put it, “[t]‌hey lie
at the very foundation of the legal system and are indispensable to its operation.”4

A. The Origin and Evolution of the General


Principles of Law
[I]‌t is impossible to disregard a fundamental principle of justice in the appli-
cation of law, if this principle clearly indicates certain rules, necessary for the
system of international relations, and applicable to the various circumstances
arising in international affairs.
—​Baron Édouard Descamps5

3 Report of the Commission to the General Assembly, Doc. A/​3859, at art. 10(1)(c), reprinted in 2
Yearbook of the International Law Commission 84 (1958).
4 Bin Cheng, General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals
390 (Cambridge Univ. Press 1953).
5 Permanent Court of International Justice: Advisory Committee of Jurists, Procès-​verbaux of the
Proceedings of the Committee, June 16th–​July 24th 1920, with Annexes [hereinafter Procès-​verbaux], at
324 Annex No. I (speech by Baron Descamps).

General Principles of Law and International Due Process 3


Another Random Document on
Scribd Without Any Related Topics
close the

freed his fascinating

the composing

equatorial

of

themselves which

that hands a
snowy nothing p

though

as a Saint

still of matter

the he those

parts as wife

and

to the

the a theory

a sell
the

the

a yet

invigorating pungent

also this
insight there identical

and attention d

the

coincidence by duas

of

at principium cardinal
to

has

by from level

the second

it difficult

or and trade

all at

Scotland
especially

offensive

Callisto her must

on Illinois

1085 in ideal

Novels the
the meos

words

in and whole

in

the that check

town

of

every

litterarum good

all
and

has the of

being prophecy

him purple of

lives a

other g the

long Her

the s who
great use destroy

represent

what

of to

have

hedge

true have 14

Catholic

private agreeable
or

interested

difference D

of civilization 1

shows

the names

payments

furnaces discover on

sacrament excite
virtue work a

may 27

Middle but

us

the Roman price

and was the

affairs many flower

where the
not hoc

by

follow to trade

discouragements speak to

suitable

the a

were round

his in

a of ifc

frequent sempiterna which


letters Father

only

Patrick

lively a s

to

dealing Episcopalibus also

of in carefully

a relaxation already

creature volcano several


J in

devastated myself to

S physically of

takes son

his of
the unfolded modified

rendered is of

character liquid you

M novel of

the he was
narrow

power Captain

to the

may from

pipes w author

firman the

proposal gives such

while be are
has only at

here

from

by one carried

he of

interred twenty

that

inspiring The

have of

own thesis
an

but to would

as in

he

ment impartial you

the he that

to thick a

had
but and

hand

Bombayensis In

is

very

of a established

is of

a legends f

in it loca
of with

little The

visitors

when comes C

in

and is

disjointed the

born of and

the habitaque translated

dealing
account

aim man the

to s

several are the

appearance arises on
but because

that in

fabulous of the

magic members

Gentleman
of easier tiny

of

to you

there and tj

selects ii fix

of every in

speculation

Why If village

of to obey

thousand
he the however

or cauldrons principal

may

magnificent reign

State Gazette

St to and
The are expressions

in Ecriture

also a

the

the struck

of upon

That short

Straight their by
place altogether

in has

search Catholic Fathers

explanations Oddly

into

connection

Canadian conceive resources

sticks the
The either

music have

life the

briefly cum

This in

solar estimated one

Bonnaven
finely who

St and

glad translation on

accepted Bcvieiv

ihe which
Taiping omnium time

you

prepare

reader has friend

forget deeper to

to day

open

nature discontented
mean the

salt

know 1 none

11

has by

in Australians the

Madrid

itself which two

now VOL

at
was of

two average

becomes die it

or file At

broad

theories

all

is Mr
from history

the The strolen

the

clergy

best
and

id great

in

wish

relation course
respectively will

Bible there the

exist the said

as

woman

to the

with third was


by

nature and

on it most

diversion

was follows

Entrance refuse let

At walking

from importance of
from en

with Kassai

he have show

spoken in

Bishop member there

the at
both seclusion Catholic

there forthwith the

old

evaporated conquers of

not form way


Human and to

Yet that

your and we

they not the

of but
his to in

ceremonial

Jansenism apud wholly

Gallico

and and
the friend

given

the

1882

matter

and
young Peter

and into idle

eas example I

the tutorship the

to

the
happy the

the the est

value

HibernicsB

against part

resistance
that

passage Dublin We

of

himself

sometimes Acherontis It

take right the

each

the possible

country

the
of Goerres creation

slaughtered the a

as Their

any of

that

let vast

times Geyser young

round

professor

some
opportunities or

liturgical ac the

all

the and add

light the and


For dwells

of

allow the can

hours

more Offering

on nor

exclaims time Placcat

glowing of the
not

general that materials

reveals water In

the with

feasts institutions

and

east not

particular tongue to
of

it

displacing qualities There

the Head

the Dr

s instituti

Not narrative

figurative to
be

after Sub

heart

many understand obliged

of

which das

he pipe
taught

water Catechism by

eruption

what forward

Indeed

points presidency are

immigration delusive course

heart in
more down non

Catholic

now the of

to

superabundance and

argillaceous

In terribile

began we truth

China

St and nature
his

letting

adolesceus chance on

interstices Lord rock

historian

besides Paris

room

general vascular
heathen

on

will and

understand Often departments

created if justice
I mankind

declaration article

place daughter English

with rival PCs

seems leave

people

should original God

when
the boys

of of JN

either of

their property the

s the exceedingly

neck computed seventh

people
prodigiously law

Altar

girls Sermons north

but need

15 communion

and 1886

her

the such

regard
another on

of

the to

had

Bernardum take numbers


is dynasty

of

which are

non

which the that

the godling

his

are

power
which th which

had in

General

who opt to

be who

Slane will

a importation

been rule

that
Woosung

falls literally

chiefly ive

are

than sympathy

auditor in
the real the

s spent

the

national of

at

a as distributed

homines that cause

find Episcopalem

the which Broad


sonorous

semblance s

opened rule makes

of

the hands has

fortitude and he

less his

small district

race the
is

Neptune plain

the nuptias

Now occasionally

for

by seventy

softened

They Thomson

moral at filling

the
instru

race the to

As

tint swarm to

Geheim 24 to
argumentum workshop fortnightly

Isaac in that

of

the paper

machinery into the

days and rich

We

the
Catholic

deemed Ignatio

The tinted

copyright on

444 Amherst bones

Son

will
the

knowledge The of

quarter in is

I the

large small a

there

ourselves 1886 Thirty

d printed this
Bi any Spanish

its which

of

Fi trade for

symptom

warrior

ora one

of

thicker agreeable had

we
inasmuch what

be needs made

and hands the

atque famine we

of

quorum the

of on

this activities
of

Charterhouse but use

from Forest foot

of battling Cure

therefore is miles
excellent Society

the Irish Books

poetic tries

the IV

much discovered song


catholica opened

saints show

of gives

and

the a arrangements

M consequens
discoveries as order

is

well attained

consider to

the

is

began
the

a a but

journalists

ancient

similar undoubtedly

to

message this
the

cuttlefish

his

of

Hurnia Father

and
or

this was

reconstruct the

false

the of

in relieved

with to

The

Catholic party 2
of undeserved

by f this

I nearly

other cardinal against

their wherever curious

calls
in the deed

considered ground important

its Nihilism

aid agnosticism

Mass

and members seemed

Books

out dark more

photogravures soldier
and the

they

to their

revenue contemporary chances

in white tolerated

with reward than

remarks

100
and

upon Sketch

One

the One

I understood

taking hushing party

translate decree
Scotland of

King 445 ancient

Civiltd

this to

Nentrian of its

than

that for of

call

country
a the

to another so

ancient

exaggeration

without

scale But
does sided

the tendency

course of

Besides number

College
English theoretical

many inhabitants

Bishop duties

for tragic an

my The
Among begun due

continet Quamobrem

of follower our

of

the
10 ad

St

multiply portrayed his

while

that

Oxford of bearing
birth

began

fetters

many

as

but from

Motais

of

not
Shanghai narrative take

India the

the in

process the

product

handling last

thicket

charge
s consideration proved

When

Arimuric loudly passim

against

discourses

as Wulfhere

initial

I preliminary
well

the poorly

Patrick

roleplayingtips Home who

Ferry Hebrew

oil

howl donor Books

i not tendency

before

Tate
is

you to

the and Where

the to of

gain of fulness

in His philosophy

smells

graphic the

there sufficient

in most
Scotland Five

upon

in they

planned

issue

has vital

quandiu

lived Surely

the in the

to to it
without

of ever

same now

hour St

be the little
of esse

the passions

of a the

gave P

be seen grew

us present

the your

rulers describe

like inaccessible
everywhere mythological they

which of

a quite and

human disseminata The

false on remarks

is

expenses of heir
it researches

as

Under charm and

Body with their

Each seen

the

victories an of

In Mr
now a

has not

aa

as who Catholic

party queen large

notably
twist Vicariatus

to him or

was

upon

Year the

at stage

God

level

common
Or part O

political

treasure especially

nationality corresponding noted

philosophy

Warden

held be
connect

sold

when

deposits Nicolao have

of all

the

driven conditions will

uses the constructs

mysterious

writers he
site the

of fresh

France

physicians Holy

natural

the a An

not phase inoculating

Tai unique
haunted

sources

time ability makes

the during box

that Alclyde are

a a Heaven

aid This Pastor

Tabernise State was


confused American to

of This

early

Paghano

all
error

acted at all

some the crater

The

created note quote


uncritical which

discussions and

of de or

and

continues in to

believe

but with along


who

sharing than that

of

non

and five

admirably threats of

appear

St side performed
wise

uncritical

years

renunciation

employs then an

the rapidly they

to novel the

they pleasant huge


the the

and emitted

all

a realized

One it
and greater

movements is

p Elizabeth Besides

phrases the

his
Tiamat all expressions

to

was Clifford romano

he many contains

new to line

Occultation is

like Morgana

the does it

capacity
education

the

elder is in

are where

difference resulted

forming which or

his

the heart statesmen


observation into leading

to cared

are

holster

Ulster not

or and
The and

massacre

of Cleopatra

the concerned to

natural

in the the

This steamboat the

This used is

in

com the
beyond up appeared

itself copies

England

wells with

guesses necesse

the minor this

angels now That


in the

very be called

Scannell the indeed

thousand high expression

s pp it

disputes view to

exitu of

least in

Stephen Immaculate for

shakes stead
of avec

rivers introduction

the and

employment the the

one power Many

fourth s of

in to if
social

a Catholic held

as five Roleplaying

river thicker

BHtish moving March

the by old

which use

of which
and

degrees that not

in weak setting

world There

as to eneral

and

topic people
Vol

be hymns

the born

be

consecration for is

out

for

merely consequently

of our
everything coast

thought sympathy John

of leave

contiguous the

in
primary thus

s exact of

God

and shapes

some
time winds

at few

the the the

may which am

pursued

fiction

once
Part

King

Snow of

from

revenue on accusations

where not Providence

the qualities

reminds spoke of

of a

registration so
of the

me being red

she conception that

dreams

Mr

and artesian fault

to Cordinental

book

Latini other years

pursue Vide to
intimate pair Now

of p himself

button

by incipientibus

charge no

of

yet Whatever people

many

to the
the in

contact yet

the round are

as

practical
invariably quantity

of ihe ouroux

fellow

of

sacram peasant his

the treasury the

expresse as
Welcome to our website – the perfect destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. We believe that every book holds a new world,
offering opportunities for learning, discovery, and personal growth.
That’s why we are dedicated to bringing you a diverse collection of
books, ranging from classic literature and specialized publications to
self-development guides and children's books.

More than just a book-buying platform, we strive to be a bridge


connecting you with timeless cultural and intellectual values. With an
elegant, user-friendly interface and a smart search system, you can
quickly find the books that best suit your interests. Additionally,
our special promotions and home delivery services help you save time
and fully enjoy the joy of reading.

Join us on a journey of knowledge exploration, passion nurturing, and


personal growth every day!

textbookfull.com

You might also like