Bok Hale 2014
Bok Hale 2014
Ultrasonics Sonochemistry
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ultson
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: The present work deals with degradation of aqueous solution of Rhodamine 6G (Rh 6G) using sonocata-
Received 28 October 2013 lytic and sonophotocatalytic treatment schemes based on the use of cupric oxide (CuO) and titanium
Received in revised form 13 March 2014 dioxide (TiO2) as the solid catalysts. Experiments have been carried out at the operating capacity of 2 L
Accepted 22 March 2014
and constant initial pH of 12.5. The effect of catalyst loading on the sonochemical degradation has been
Available online 1 April 2014
investigated by varying the loading over the range of 1.5–4.5 g/L. It has been observed that the maximum
degradation of 52.2% was obtained at an optimum concentration of CuO as 1.5 g/L whereas for TiO2 max-
Keywords:
imum degradation was observed as 51.2% at a loading of 4 g/L over similar treatment period. Studies with
Sonolysis
Photocatalysis
presence of radical scavengers such as methanol (CH3OH) and n-butanol (C4H9OH) indicated lower
Rhodamine 6G degradation extents of degradation confirming the dominance of radical mechanism. The combined approach of ultra-
Intensification sound, solid catalyst and scavengers has also been investigated at optimum loadings to simulate real con-
Radical scavengers ditions. The optimal solid loading was used for studies involving oxidation using UV irradiations where
COD removal 26.4% and 28.9% of degradation was achieved at optimal loading of CuO and TiO2, respectively. Studies
using combination of UV and US irradiations have also been carried out using the optimal concentration
of the catalysts. It has been observed that maximum degradation of 63.3% is achieved using combined US
and UV with TiO2 (4 g/L) as the photocatalyst. Overall it can be said that the combined processes give
higher extent of degradation as compared to the individual processes based on US or UV irradiations.
Ó 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction the oxygen levels drastically leading to severe problems with the
ecosystem. Even a very small amount of dye in water is visible
With ever increasing human requirements, newer and more and impedes light penetration and thus reduces the photosynthe-
toxic chemical species are being developed and possibly dis- sis process of the aquatic plants, affecting their growth and also de-
charged in the effluent streams. Various industries are responsible creases the gas solubility, interfering with the natural system [1].
for contributing such chemicals into the environment. Among all Wastewater containing dye is poisonous, carcinogenic and terato-
the industries, textile and dying industries contribute the major genic to human beings. Therefore, it becomes utmost important to
portion of overall water pollution. Till date, more than 100,000 develop efficient removal approaches and disposal methods for
dyes are commercially available. It is observed that, typically two stable dyes. The efficacy of the conventional methods, especially
tons of dye is required for dying 25 tons of fiber and very less quan- the most commonly used biological oxidation schemes, can be
tity of the dye is actually attached to the fabric leaving most of the lower for the dye wastewater treatment due to the presence of
chemicals into the effluent streams. These discharged effluents can molecules refractory to the micro-organisms in the wastewater
be colored especially due to the residual dyes and can give obnox- streams. Also, the treatment times with chemical/biological meth-
ious color to the natural water sources due to possible mixing, if ods may be quite high and total mineralization may not be possible
not treated properly. The mixing of colored effluents can change especially for a complex effluent stream containing a mixture of
pollutants in high concentration and thus, there is a need to devel-
op treatment schemes based on the use of advanced techniques,
⇑ Corresponding authors. Tel.: +91 8600047170 (A.V. Mohod). Tel.:+91 22
which can operate either individually or in combination with the
33612024; fax: +91 22 33611020 (P.R. Gogate).
E-mail addresses: [email protected] (A.V. Mohod), pr.gogate@
conventional methods to meet the stringent environmental regula-
ictmumbai.edu.in (P.R. Gogate). tions [2]. Advanced oxidation processes (AOP) or in general the
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2014.03.022
1350-4177/Ó 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1798 N.B. Bokhale et al. / Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 21 (2014) 1797–1804
in the case of CuO gives more scattering effects which gives opti-
40
mum loading at lower concentration of the CuO as compared to
TiO2. Overall, it should be noted that the addition of solid catalyst
30
TiO2 gives multiple effects in terms of surface cavitation, scattering of
20 incident sound waves as well as catalytic action in terms of en-
hanced formation of hydroxyl radicals and the final end result on
10 the extent of degradation would be dependent on the net result
of these counteracting effects.
0
0 1 2 3 4 5
3.3. Effect of methanol addition
Catalyst loading, g/L
Fig. 3. Effect of TiO2 on Rh 6G degradation using US (pH = 12.5; concentra- The effect of methanol addition on the extent of degradation
tion = 10 ppm; catalyst loading 1.5–4.5 g/L). was investigated at constant operating volume of 2 L for different
1800 N.B. Bokhale et al. / Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 21 (2014) 1797–1804
loading of methanol (1.5–4.5 ml/L) and the obtained results have 6G have been depicted in Fig. 6. It can be observed from the figure
been given in Fig. 5. It has been observed that as the concentration that the extent of degradation augmented initially till an optimum
of methanol increases, the extent of degradation also increases. It loading beyond which a decrease in the extent of degradation was
can be seen that the extent of degradation is higher at higher load- observed for a further increase in the loading of n-butanol. The
ing i.e. 4.5 ml/ L as compared to the lower loading of methanol maximum extent of degradation as 22% was obtained with the
(1.5 ml/L). The addition of methanol can create CH2OH radicals in addition of 1.5 ml/L of n-butanol. The detrimental effect of higher
the system which can play a role in abstraction of H radicals from concentration of n-butanol can be explained by competitive hydro-
the system [26–28] making the OH radicals available for the de- xyl radical reactions with Rh 6G and n-butanol [29]. The obtained
sired reaction of dye degradation to a greater extent. Presence of result shows that hydroxyl radical plays an important role in son-
methanol can also have a scavenging action on the hydroxyl radi- olytic degradation of Rh 6G and presence of strong scavenging ac-
cals but the higher volatility of methanol ensures quick production tion results in detrimental effects. It is also important to note here
of CH2OH radicals which play a positive role. The obtained results that due to lower volatility of the n-butanol as compared to meth-
confirm that the scavenging action is not the main factor in decid- anol, the production of radicals for abstraction of H is reduced and
ing the sonolysis of Rh 6G. also larger presence in the bulk leads to a dominant scavenging ac-
tion on the hydroxyl radicals. The overall result is that the compet-
itive reactions of OH with alcohols leads to the consumption of the
3.4. Effect of n-butanol addition hydroxyl radicals by undesired reaction leading to reduced dye
degradation.
To understand the exact role of hydroxyl radical as the primary An increase in the extent of degradation at lower concentration
oxidant, sonolysis of Rh 6G in the aqueous solution was carried out of alcohol can also be explained on the basis of action of alcohols in
in the presence of strong radical scavenger such as n-butanol as altering the bubble concentration. Riesz et al. [12] reported that OH
compared to the possible scavenging action of methanol. Different radicals are produced inside the bubble or at the bubble-water
experiments were performed to understand the effect of n-butanol interface of stable cavitation bubbles. The generation of radicals
at various loadings over the range of 1.5–4.5 ml/L. The obtained re- in the sonication may be closely related to the characteristics of
sults for the effect of n-butanol on the extent of degradation of Rh
30
25
25
Extent of degradation, %
20
Extent of degradation, %
20
15
15
Methanol n-butanol
10
10
5 5
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5
Methanol loading, ml/L n-butanol loading, ml/L
Fig. 5. Effect of methanol on Rh 6G degradation using US (pH = 12.5; Fig. 6. Effect of n-butanol on Rh 6G degradation using US (pH = 12.5;
concentration = 10 ppm; catalyst loading 1.5 and 4.5 ml/L). concentration = 10 ppm; catalyst loading 1.5–4.5 g/L).
N.B. Bokhale et al. / Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 21 (2014) 1797–1804 1801
Table 1 70
Maximum extent of degradation of Rh 6G at optimum loadings of additives.
60
Sr. no. Additive Optimized loading Extent of degradation (%)
Extent of degradaon, %
1 TiO2 4.0 g/L 51.2 50
US+CuO
2 CuO 1.5 g/L 59.2
40 US alone
3 Methanol 4.5 ml/L 28.8
4 n-Butanol 1.5 ml/L 26.1 UV + CuO
30
UV alone
20 US+UV+CuO
US+UV alone
cavitation bubbles. Because of the transient characteristics of bub- 10
bles at 50 kHz, the possibility for the recombination reaction be-
tween OH and H radical increases due to the longer expansion 0
US+CuO US alone UV + CuO UV alone US+UV+CuO US+UV
period of bubble at lower frequency (50 kHz) [30]. This implies that alone
the transportation of OH radicals to the interface of bubble-solu-
tion will become difficult at lower ultrasonic frequency (50 kHz). Fig. 7. Variation in the extent of degradation of Rh 6G with or without CuO catalyst
under different modes of operations (pH = 12.5; concentration = 10 ppm).
The addition of alcohol in sonication with low frequency can pre-
vent the coalescence of bubbles by adsorption onto the surface of
bubble, resulting in an increase in the number of active bubbles 70
[31–34]. Due to the enhanced active bubbles, the extent of cavita-
tional intensity increases leading to an overall increase in the ex- 60
tent of degradation. It is also expected that the contribution of
Extent of degradaon, %
methanol to enhancing the number of active bubbles will be higher 50
due to higher effect on the stability of cavitation bubbles and hence US+TiO2
40
higher extents of degradation are obtained in the presence of US alone
methanol as compared to n-butanol. 30 UV+ TiO2
A summary of the maximum extents of degradation obtained by UV alone
using different heterogeneous catalysts (CuO, TiO2) and other addi- 20
US+UV+ TiO2
tives such as methanol and n-butanol based on the use of ultra- US+UV alone
10
sonic method have been given in Table 1 which confirm the
maximum degradation obtained for the sonocatalytic approach of 0
US + CuO.
4. Sonophotocatalytic degradation
Fig. 8. Variation in the extent of degradation of Rh 6G with or without TiO2 catalyst
under different modes of operations (pH = 12.5; concentration = 10 ppm).
4.1. Effect of combination studies at optimal CuO (1.5 g/l) loadings
Initially, degradation of Rh 6G was studied using ultrasound and compared to US + catalyst but does not yield the additive effect.
ultraviolet irradiation alone to quantify the extent of degradation It is interesting to note here that the combined treatment based
using basic approaches. It has been observed that degradation of on the use of CuO catalyst did not result in synergistic results. It
Rh 6G was possible up to certain limiting value and it enhanced is important to note that the synergistic results will be obtained
in the presence of CuO for both the irradiations, though significant mostly where the reduced efficiency of photocatalyst attributed
effect was observed for the ultrasonic irradiations as compared to to the adsorption of contaminants on the surface resulting in the
the ultraviolet irradiation. At pH 12.5 and using optimum catalyst blocking of the active sites is dominant [38]. Overall it can be said
loading of CuO, it has been observed that the kinetic rate constant that it is just better to operate under the sonocatalytic mode as
followed the order of US + Catalyst (7.0 min 1) > UV + Catalyst compared to the sonophotocatalytic mode of operation. In the case
(2.2 min 1). The maximum degradation of 52.8% is obtained for of combined operation of sonophotocatalysis, the extent of COD re-
the combined operation of US and optimal CuO after 180 min of moval was 84% in the same treatment period.
treatment due to the enhanced formation of hydroxyl radicals
(OH), and hydroperoxyl radicals (O2H) leading to a increase in 4.2. Effect of combination studies at optimal TiO2 (4 g/l) loadings
the rates of reactions with Rh 6G in the bulk solution or at the
interface between the bubbles and the liquid phase [35,36]. The ex- Experiments were also carried out to compare the efficacy of
tent of degradation was found to be 26.4% for the UV treatment in sonocatalysis (US + TiO2), photocatalysis (UV + TiO2) and sonop-
the presence of CuO as catalyst after 180 min of reaction time. hotocatalysis (US + UV + TiO2). Initially, the degradation of Rh 6G
Murugandham and Swaminathan [37] investigated the effect of (10 ppm initial concentration) was investigated using individual
catalyst loading on the degradation of RY 14 azo dye with initial operations i.e. sonochemical and photocatalytic oxidation. The
concentration of 5 10 4 mol/l and reported that the maximum solution was sonicated for 180 min and the extent of degradation
(91.3%) extent of decolorization was obtained in presence of cata- was found to be 51.2% as shown in Fig. 8. Similarly, the extent of
lyst i.e. TiO2 particles. It can be also established in the present work degradation was found to be 28.9% for the photocatalytic oxida-
that under specific conditions i.e. with optimal catalyst, sonocata- tion. In the case of combined approach, 63.3% degradation was
lytic approach have better efficacy as compared to the combination achieved. Also, it has been observed that the maximum COD re-
of ultraviolet irradiation with the catalyst. moval (89%) was obtained by using combined approach of TiO2
The extent of degradation for combined approach of US + UV (Table 2). Thus, it can be said that the combination of US and UV
and CuO catalyst was 60.8% after 180 min reaction time. The re- irradiations have better efficacy as compared to the ultrasonic irra-
sults for the combination approach have been depicted in Fig. 7 diations and UV irradiations alone for the case of TiO2 as the
and it can be seen that the extent of degradation is increased as catalyst, though it is not resulting in any synergistic effects.
1802 N.B. Bokhale et al. / Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 21 (2014) 1797–1804
Table 2 46.9% when the experiments were carried out with optimal meth-
Maximum extent of degradation of Rh 6G using combination of both irradiation. anol loading i.e. 4.5 ml/L in the presence of UV irradiation. This can
Sr. no. Studies Extent of degradation (%) % Removal of COD be attributed to the fact that the enhancement of Rh 6G removal
1 US + UV + TiO2 63.3 89 percent in this case is due to interaction of photons of a proper en-
2 US + UV + CuO 60.8 84 ergy level with the molecules of chemical species present in the
3 US + UV + Methanol 34.0 63 solution, with or without the presence of the catalyst [42–44].
4 US + UV + Butanol 40.0 76 Stock et al. [43] have reported similar results about enhanced effi-
cacy of UV irradiations in degradation of Naphthol Blue black (NBB)
as compared to ultrasound.
Fig. 9 shows the degradation spectrum of Rh 6G using combination Further, the rate of degradation of Rh 6G with optimized con-
of both irradiations along with catalyst TiO2 at different treatment centration of n-butanol i.e. 1.5 ml/L followed the order of US/UV/
times, which also confirms effective removal of the dye using the n-butanol > US/n-butanol > UV/n-butanol. Fig. 11 gives the results
combination approach. It is important to note here that the syner- obtained for the combination approach of optimal n-butanol with
gistic effects are likely to observed only where there is a possibility US and UV. As seen in the figure, the effect in the present work was
of blocking of the active sites by the pollutant or its intermediate not much pronounced since only 40.9% degradation was obtained
degradation products resulting in a substantial decrease in the with combination of US and UV radiation as against 26.0% and
quantum of free radicals generated in the system and hence the 37.2% using US and UV individually. It has been observed that
rates of degradation with an increase in the treatment time. The re- operation using UV alone and combined approaches results in al-
sults obtained in the present work establish that such mechanism most similar percentage of removal of Rh 6G. Table 2 shows that
does not exist and hence possible increase in the extent of degra- maximum percentage degradation and percentage removal of
dation would be due to enhanced generation of hydroxyl radicals COD obtained using combination mode irradiation whereas all
and its subsequent utilization by pollutant molecules to a limited the kinetic rate constant along with percentage degradation are
extent [38–41]. Sonolysis can also increase the photocatalytic reac- summarized in Table 3. Manousaki et al. [44] and Dai et al. [45],
tion rate by increasing the catalytic activity of the semiconductor demonstrated that butanol quenches hydroxyl radicals, reducing
catalyst. This could occur through the size reduction of photocata- rate of degradation.
lyst particles consequent to particle deagregation, leading to an in-
crease in the surface area and hence enhanced catalytic 4.4. Effect of combination of radical promoters and scavengers
performance. Other effects induced by US, such as acceleration of
the mass transfer between the solution phase and the photocata- To understand the exact role of solid catalyst and scavengers,
lyst surface and continuous cleaning of the catalyst by acoustic experiments were carried out at optimal catalyst loadings as
cavitation, might also have some role in increasing the photocata- 1.5 g/L of CuO, 4 g/L of TiO2 and optimal loadings of radical scav-
lytic degradation rates. engers as 4.5 ml/L of methanol and 1.5 ml of n-butanol. The ob-
tained trends for degradation of Rh 6G using combined approach
4.3. Effect of combination studies at optimal alcohol (methanol and n- of solid catalysts and scavengers have been depicted in Fig. 12. It
butanol) loading can be seen from figure that using the combination of solid catalyst
and radical scavengers along with ultrasound marginally affects
To verify reaction pathway and effects of radical scavenger, the extent of degradation. The extent of degradation is higher for
experiments were carried out using methanol and n-butanol in the combined approach of CuO with alcohols as against only CuO
combination with US and UV. Fig. 10 shows the extent of degrada- though definitely additive effect is not seen. Similar result was also
tion of Rh 6G with or without methanol additive using individual seen for the combination of optimal TiO2 and additives. It has also
operation of irradiation and combination mode. It can be observed been found that the extent of degradation of Rh 6G using combined
from the figure that maximum extent of degradation of Rh 6G was optimal TiO2 and additives is less than combined optimal CuO and
Fig. 9. Spectrum of degradation of Rh 6G with TiO2 catalyst combined with US and UV (pH = 12.5; concentration = 10 ppm).
N.B. Bokhale et al. / Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 21 (2014) 1797–1804 1803
50 Table 3
Kinetic rate constant for all studies with percentage degradation of Rh 6G.
45
S.N. Studies Rate constant, Degradation
40 k 103 (min 1) (%)
Extent of degrdaon, %
US alone
20
UV+n-butanol
15
UV alone
10 80
US+UV+n-butanol
5 US+UV alone 70
0 60
Extent of Degradaon, %
50
CuO + methanol
40 CuO + n-butanol
TiO2 + methanol
30
Fig. 11. Variation in the extent of degradation of Rh 6G with or without n-butanol TiO2 + n-butanol
10
The present work has shown that Rh 6G as a basic dye can be using combination mode (US + UV) with TiO2 (4 g/L). The work has
effectively removed by using combinations of ultrasound irradia- clearly established the suitability of combined approach as a pre-
tion and UV irradiations. It can be concluded that for effective deg- treatment to dye containing wastewaters wherein the further
radation of Rh 6G, use of catalyst is vital. For individual operation treatment may be achieved more effectively by the biological
of two modes of irradiation, sonolysis has more efficiency as com- oxidation.
pared to photolysis. Based on the optimization studies for the ef-
fect of additives, it can be concluded that beneficial effects have
been observed due to the use of different heterogeneous catalysts References
such as CuO and TiO2 whereas additives such as methanol at lower
concentrations resulted into marginal enhancement in the extent [1] O. Hamdaoui, Batch study of liquid-phase adsorption of methylene blue using
cedar sawdust and crushed brick, J. Hazard. Mater. 135 (2006) 264–273.
of degradation of Rh 6G. The optimum loading for beneficial results
[2] A.A. Pradhan, P.R. Gogate, Degradation of p-nitrophenol using acoustic
for n-butanol was lower as compared to methanol which can be cavitation and Fenton chemistry, J. Hazard. Mater. 173 (2010) 517–522.
attributed to stronger scavenging action. Experimental results [3] P.R. Gogate, A.B. Pandit, A review of imperative technologies for wastewater
indicate that maximum degradation for sonocatalytic approaches treatment I: oxidation technologies at ambient conditions, Adv. Environ. Res. 8
(2004) 501–551.
was obtained at optimized loading of CuO (1.5 g/L) with ultrasound [4] D.H. Bremner, S.D. Carlo, A.G. Chakinala, G. Cravotto, Mineralization of 2,4-
(US) technique as 59.2% whereas 63.3% degradation was observed dichlorophenoxyacetic acid by acoustic or hydrodynamic cavitation in
1804 N.B. Bokhale et al. / Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 21 (2014) 1797–1804
conjunction with the advanced Fenton process, Ultrason. Sonochem. 15 (2008) [24] Y.G. Adewuyi, Sonochemistry in environmental remediation. 2. Heterogeneous
416–419. sonophotocatalytic oxidation processes for the treatment of pollutants in
[5] Z. Guo, Z. Zheng, S. Zheng, W. Hu, R. Feng, Effect of various sono-oxidation water, Environ. Sci. Technol. 39 (2005) 8557–8570.
parameters on the removal of aqueous 2,4-dinitrophenol, Ultrason. Sonochem. [25] P.R. Gogate, A.B. Pandit, A review of imperative technologies for waste water
12 (2005) 461–465. treatment II. Hybrid methods, Adv. Environ. Res. 8 (2004) 553–597.
[6] Y.L. Song, J.T. Li, H. Chen, Degradation of CI Acid Red 88 aqueous solution by [26] P. Neta, J. Grodkowski, A.B. Ross, Rate constants for reactions of aliphatic
combination of Fenton’s reagent and ultrasound irradiation, J. Chem. Technol. carbon-centered radicals in aqueous solution, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 25
Biotechnol. 84 (2009) 578–583. (1996) 709–1050.
[7] A.G. Chakinala, P.R. Gogate, A.E. Burgess, D.H. Bremner, Industrial wastewater [27] M.C. Gonzalez, G.C. Le Roux, J.A. Rosso, A.M. Braun, Mineralization of CCl4 by
treatment using hydrodynamic cavitation and heterogeneous advanced fenton the UVC – photolysis of hydrogen peroxide in the presence of methanol,
processing, Chem. Eng. J. 152 (2009) 498–502. Chemosphere 69 (2007) 1238–1244.
[8] K.C. Namkung, A.E. Burgess, D.H. Bremner, H. Staines, Advanced Fenton [28] J. Kwonim, H.-S. Son, S.-K. Kim, J. Khim, K.-D. Zoh, Effect of frequency on the
processing of aqueous phenol solutions: a continuous system study including sonolytic degradation of carbon tetrachloride, Sustain, Environ. Res. 21 (2011)
sonication effects, Ultrason. Sonochem. 15 (2008) 171–176. 167–172.
[9] I. Ioan, S. Wilson, E. Lundanes, A. Neculai, Comparison of Fenton and sono- [29] M.A. Behnajaday, N. Modinshahla, M. Shokri, Photodestruction of acid orange 7
Fenton bisphenol A degradation, J. Hazard. Mater. 142 (2007) 559–563. in a tubular continuous-flow photoreactor, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 55 (2004)
[10] M. Papadaki, R.J. Emery, M.A.A. Hassan, A.D. Bustos, I.S. Metcalfe, D. 129–134.
Mantzavinos, Sonocatalytic oxidation processes for the removal of [30] P. Riesz, T. Kondo, Free radical formation induced by ultrasound and its
contaminants containing aromatic rings from aqueous effluents, Sep. Purif. biological implications, Free Radical Biol. Med. 13 (1992) 247–270.
Technol. 34 (2004) 35–42. [31] H.S. Son, S.B. Choi, E. Khan, K.D. Zoh, Removal of 1,4-dioxane from water using
[11] J.H. Sun, S.P. Sun, J.Y. Sun, R.X. Sun, L.P. Qiao, H.Q. Guo, M.H. Fan, Degradation sonication, Water Res. 40 (2006) 692–698.
of azo dye acid black 1 using low concentration iron of Fenton process [32] G.H. Price, M. Ashokkumar, F. Grieser, Sonoluminescence quenching of organic
facilitated by ultrasonic irradiation, Ultrason. Sonochem. 14 (2007) 761–766. compounds in aqueous solution: frequency effects and implications for
[12] A.G. Chakinala, D.H. Bremner, P.R. Gogate, K.C. Namkung, A.E. Burgess, sonochemistry, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126 (2004) 2755–2762.
Multivariate analysis of phenol mineralisation by combined hydrodynamic [33] J. Lee, S.E. Kentish, M. Ashokkumar, The effect of surface-active solutes on
cavitation and heterogeneous advanced Fenton processing, Appl. Catal., B 78 bubble coalescence in the presence of ultrasound, J. Phys. Chem. B 109 (2005)
(2008) 11–18. 5095–5099.
[13] B.S. Banerjee, A.V. Khode, A.P. Patil, A.V. Mohod, P.R. Gogate, Sonochemical [34] D. Sunartio, M. Ashokkumar, F. Grieser, The influence of acoustic power on
decolorization of wastewaters containing rhodamine 6G using ultrasonic bath multibubble sonoluminescence in aqueous solution containing organic
at an operating capacity of 2L, Desalin. Water Treat. J. 52 (2013) 1378–1387. solutes, J. Phys. Chem. B 109 (2005) 20044–20050.
[14] C. Lizama, J. Freer, J. Baeza, H.D. Mansilla, Optimized photodegradation of [35] N.H. Ince, G. Tezcanli-Guyer, R.K. Belen, I.G. Apikyan, Ultrasound as a catalyzer
Reactive Blue 19 on TiO2 and ZnO suspensions, Catal. Today 76 (2002) of aqueous reaction systems: the state of the art and environmental
235–246. applications, Appl. Catal., B 29 (2001) 167–176.
[15] S.K. Kansal, M. Singh, D. Sud, Studies on photodegradation of two commercial [36] M.A. Beckett, I. Hua, Elucidation of the 1,4-dioxane decomposition path-way at
dyes in aqueous phase using different photocatalysts, J. Hazard. Mater. 141 discrete ultrasonic frequencies, Environ. Sci. Technol. 34 (2000) 3944–3953.
(2007) 581–590. [37] M. Muruganandham, M. Swaminathan, Advanced oxidative decolorization of
[16] P.R. Gogate, Cavitational reactors for process intensification of chemical pro- reactive yellow 14 azo dye by UV/TiO2, UV/H2O2, UV/H2O2/Fe2+ processes – a
cessing applications: a critical review, Chem. Eng. Process. 47 (2008) 515–527. comparative study, Sep. Purif. Technol. 48 (2006) 297–303.
[17] M. Bertelli, E. Selli, Kinetic analysison thecombineduseof photocatalysis, H2O2 [38] K.P. Mishra, P.R. Gogate, Intensification of sonophotocatalytic degradation of
photolysis, and sonolysis in the degradation of methyl tert-butyl ether, Appl. p-nitrophenol at pilot scale capacity, Ultrason. Sonochem. 18 (2011) 739–744.
Catal., B 52 (2004) 205–212. [39] N. Serpone, E. Pelizzeti, Photocatalysis Fundamental and Applications, Wiley,
[18] T. Tuziuti, K. Yasui, M. Sivakumar, Y. Iida, Correlation between acoustic New York, 1989. 16–56.
cavitation noise and yield enhancement of sonochemical reaction by particle [40] J.M. Herrmann, C. Guillard, P. Pichat, Heterogeneous photocatalysis: an
addition, J. Phys. Chem. A 109 (2005) 4869–4872. emerging technology for water treatment, Catal. Today 17 (1993) 7–20.
[19] S.N. Katekhaye, P.R. Gogate, Intensification of cavitational activity in [41] M.R. Hoffmann, S.T. Martin, W. Choi, D.W. Bahnemann, Environmental
sonochemical reactors using different additives: efficacy assessment using a applications of semiconductor photocatalysis, Chem. Rev. 95 (1995) 69–96.
model reaction, Chem. Eng. Process. 50 (2011) 95–103. [42] C.S. Truchi, D.F. Ollis, Photocatalytic degradation of organic water
[20] I.Z. Shirgaonkar, A.B. Pandit, Sonophotochemical destruction of aqueous contaminants: mechanisms involving hydroxyl radical attack, J. Catal. 122
solution of 2,4,6-trichlorophenol, Ultrason. Sonochem. 5 (1998) 53–61. (1990) 178–196.
[21] A.G. Chakinala, P.R. Gogate, A.E. Burgess, D.H. Bremner, Intensification of [43] A. De Visscher, P. Van Eenoo, D. Drijvers, H.V. Langenhove, Kinetic model for
hydroxyl radical production in sonochemical reactors, Ultrason. Sonochem. 14 the sonochemical degradation of monocyclic aromatic compounds in aqueous
(2007) 509–514. solution, J. Phys. Chem. 100 (1996) 11636–11642.
[22] M. Kubo, K. Matsuoka, A. Takahashi, N. Shibasaki-Kitakawa, T. Yonemoto, [44] N.L. Stock, J. Peller, K. Vinodgopal, P.V. Kamat, Combinative sonolysis and
Kinetics of ultrasonic degradation of phenol in the presence of TiO2 particles, photocatalysis for textile dye degradation, Environ. Sci. Technol. 34 (9) (2000)
Ultrason. Sonochem. 12 (2005) 263–269. 1747–1750.
[23] P.R. Gogate, S. Majumdar, A.B. Pandit, Large scale sonochemical reactors for [45] A. Kaidar, H. Eric, C. Michel, B. Alain, Application of advanced oxidation
process intensification: design and experimental validation, J. Chem. Technol. processes for TNT removal: a review, J. Hazard. Mater. 178 (2010) 10–28.
Biotechnol. 78 (2003) 685–693.