Fact and Comparison NGT
Fact and Comparison NGT
FEATURED ARTICLE
A Guide to Drug Therapy in Patients with Enteral Feeding Tubes: Dosage Form Selection and Administration Methods
M. Christina Beckwith, PharmD,* Sarah S. Feddema, PharmD,* Richard G. Barton, MD, and Caran Graves, RD
Abstract Drug therapy may be complicated in hospitalized patients receiving nutrition via enteral feeding tubes. Dosage form selection and appropriate administration methods are crucial in patients with feeding tubes. Although hospitalized patients receive nutritional support through various routes, oral nutrition is preferred. Enteral or parenteral nutrition may be used if oral intake is inadequate or inadvisable. Patients with functional gastrointestinal tracts usually receive enteral nutrition. Administering oral medications through the enteral feeding tube can lead to complications like tube clogging or decreased drug activity. However, drug therapy need not be compromised in patients receiving enteral nutrition. Careful selection and preparation of dosage forms reduces the complications of medication administration. Flushing the feeding tube and screening for drug incompatibilities decreases the incidence of tube clogging and replacement. Key Words critical care; drug administration; enteral nutrition Hosp Pharm 2004;39:225237
neously, by manual insertion at the bedside, traditional surgical techniques, laparoscopy, endoscopy, or fluoroscopic guidance. Enteral nutrition formulas may be infused into the stomach, duodenum, or jejunum.3,4 Small-Bore Tubes Flexible, small-bore nasoenteric (NE) tubes (ie, Dobhoff, Miller-Frederick) are commonly used for short-term enteral feedings. These tubes can be placed into the stomach or even the duodenum at the bedside, or into the duodenum or jejunum using fluoroscopy or endoscopy. These soft, small lumen tubes may help maintain the competence of the lower esophageal sphincter, providing a physical barrier between the nutrient solution and the bronchial tree.3,4 Tablets, pills, lozenges, and some crushed dosage forms should not be placed in the NE tube because they may clog the tube, necessitating replacement. Only liquid dosage forms should be placed in the NE tube.5,6 The needle catheter jejunostomy (NCJ) is another small-bore tube used for enteral feeding. The NCJ is inserted surgically, has a smaller bore than the NE tube, and clogs easily. Avoid administering drugs by this route whenever possible.4 Because a procedure is needed for insertion, repeated replaceHospital Pharmacy
rug therapy may be complicated in hospitalized patients receiving nutrition via enteral feeding tubes. Although oral nutrition is preferred, patients may require enteral or parenteral nutrition if oral intake is inadequate or inadvisable. Patients with functional gastrointestinal (GI) tracts usually receive enteral nutrition through a feeding tube.1 Some medications may be given through the enteral feeding tube. However, tube obstruction, increased toxicity, or reduced effi-
cacy may occur if an improper administration method is used. In one survey, 74% of hospital staff used at least two incorrect methods to administer drugs via feeding tubes.2 This article describes an approach to dosage form selection and drug administration methods in these patients. Appendix A summarizes medication administration procedures. METHODS OF ENTERAL FEEDING Enteral feeding tubes may be inserted orally, nasally, or percuta-
*Drug Information Service, Department of Surgery, Nutrition Care Services: University of Utah Hospitals and Clinics, Salt Lake City, Utah.
225
Intravenous
Dexamethasone, Digoxin, Enalaprilat, Hydromorphone, Methotrexate, Morphine, Phenytoin, Promethazine Acetaminophen, Aspirin, Bisacodyl, Caffeine/ergotamine, Lactulose, Mesalamine, Morphine, Prochlorperazine, Promethazine, Sodium polystyrene sulfonate Fentanyl, Hydromorphone, Morphine
Subcutaneous
Sublingual
Isosorbide, Nitroglyerin
226
ment of NE/NCJ tubes may increase hospital costs, patient discomfort, and infection risk. Large-Bore Tubes Several types of large-bore tubes may be used for enteral feedings, including nasogastric (NG) and orogastric (OG) tubes (ie, Salem sump), as well as tubes that cross the body wall, such as gastrostomy (G) or jejunostomy (J) tubes.7 These tubes may be placed using open or laparoscopic surgical techniques, endoscopically, or under fluoroscopy. Compared with NE or NCJ tubes, large-bore tubes are less likely to clog. Nasogastric tubes are also stiffer than NE tubes and may be inserted at the bedside. Because tube insertion is relatively easier, tube replacement costs are lower for NG tubes than for NE or NCJ tubes.3,4 Although NG tubes, including the Salem sump, may be used for enteral nutrition, their main purpose is to suction gastric contents in patients with impaired GI tract function (eg, gastric stasis, ileus, bowel obstruction).3,4 These tubes are stiffer than NE tubes and may increase aspiration risk by compromising swallowing and reducing the integrity of the lower esophageal sphincter.3,4 In general, stiff, large-bore NG tubes should not be used as feeding tubes when other options exist. One possible exception may be in the intensive care unit, where patients are often intubated and closely monitored; in such cases, it may be unacceptable to risk transporting patients to place a more traditional feeding tube. Because the primary purpose of an NG tube is to suction gastric contents, it is important to remember that any medications given through the tube may be suctioned
Sustained-release Enteric-coated Sustained-release Sustained-release Sustained-release Sustained-release Sustained-release Sustained-release Taste Enteric-coated Sustained-release
Sustained-release Effervescent Enteric-coated Sustained-release Sustained-release Enteric-coated Sustained-release Liquid-filled capsule Liquid-filled capsule Sublingual product (continued)
Hospital Pharmacy
227
out, preventing absorption.8 Clamping the NG tube for at least 30 minutes after drug administration increases absorption if the GI tract is functioning.6 However, many patients with GI tract dysfunction cannot tolerate long periods of tube clamping.8 MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION PLAN The key to managing medications in enterally fed patients is to focus on prioritizing therapeutic goals. First, temporarily discontinue medications that are not immediately necessary (eg, hormone replacement therapy).9 Second, consider giving medications by an alternate route, such as transdermal, rectal, inhaled, intramuscular, subcutaneous, buccal, sublingual, or intravenous. The appropriateness of each route should be assessed based on the patients clinical status and medication needs (see Table 1). Third, when products are not available in alternate dosage forms, consider using another drug with similar pharmacologic effects. For example, transdermal fentanyl could be used for pain instead of oral morphine. Dosage or frequency adjustments may be necessary when changing administration routes, especially if patients are switched from one agent to another (eg, morphine to fentanyl).9 ENTERAL ADMINISTRATION OF MEDICATIONS Medications may be given via the feeding tube if necessary.9,10 However, clinicians must first evaluate tube type, tube location in the GI tract, site of drug action and absorption, and the effects of food on drug absorption. For example, antacids, bismuth, and sucralfate act locally in the stomach and are not suitable
Sustained-release Sustained-release Sublingual product Sustained-release Irritant Sustained-release Sustained-release Sustained-release Sustained-release Sustained-release Sustained-release Enteric-coated Sustained-release Sustained-release Sustained-release Enteric-coated Sustained-release (continued)
228
Sustained-release Sustained-release Sustained-release Sustained-release Sustained-release Sustained-release Sustained-release Sustained-release Enteric-coated Sustained-release Sustained-release Sustained-release Sustained-release
for administration via intestinal feeding tubes.9,10 Bioavailability may increase with intrajejunal administration of drugs with extensive first-pass metabolism, such as opioids, tricyclics, beta blockers, or nitrates. Buccal and sublingual dosage forms may be ineffective when given enterally. For drugs that require administration on an empty stomach, stop enteral feeding for 30 minutes before and after dosing if the tube is placed in the stomach.9,10 The use of liquid dosage forms is preferred whenever possible. Liquid preparations for oral or IV use may be substituted for solid dosage forms.3,6,7 Many tablets may be crushed to a fine powder, mixed to a slurry in water, and given through large-bore feeding tubes. The contents of most capsules may be administered in the same manner.3 Regardless of which dosage form is used, the feeding tube should be flushed with at least 30 mL of water before and after administration to clear any residual medication.3,6,7 In general, medications should not be added to the enteral formula, both to reduce the risk of microbial contamination and to avoid drugnutrient incompatibilities.11,12 Many oral products should not be crushed (see Table 2). Sustained-release, enteric-coated, or microencapsulated products should neither be crushed nor given through feeding tubes as intact tablets or capsules.13 Crushing destroys the sustained-release properties of sustained-release tablets and microencapsulated drugs, resulting in erratic blood levels. Enteric coatings do not crush well but break into small chunks that bond together when moist, clogging the tube.13 Because aerosolized particles
Hospital Pharmacy
229
may be harmful to hospital staff, avoid crushing drugs with teratogenic, carcinogenic, or cytotoxic properties, such as antineoplastics, hormones, and prostaglandin analogs. Cross-contamination from the tablet crushing device is also possible; avoid crushing medications that commonly cause allergic reactions.9,10 The pellets inside some microencapsulated products may be poured down the large-bore enteral feeding tube after being removed from the capsule, provided that the pellets are not crushed. Medications that may be given in this manner include diltiazem (Cardizem CD, Cardizem SR), ferrous gluconate (Fergon), nizatidine (Axid), pancreatic enzymes (Creon, Pancrease, Pancrease MT), theophylline (many generic brands), and verapamil (Verelan).6,13 Cromolyn (Gastrocrom) capsules may be administered by opening the capsule and dissolving the contents in water before pouring the mixture down the feeding tube. Liquid contents of soft gelatin capsules (acetazolamide, nifedipine) may be aspirated from the capsule and given via the feeding tube as immediate-release dosage forms, provided that the capsule contents are completely removed.6,13 Proton-Pump Inhibitors The proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) present a special dilemma. Because the active drugs are acidlabile and undergo gastric degradation, the products are formulated to reduce the amount of drug lost to hydrolysis. Omeprazole (Prilosec), lansoprazole (Prevacid), and esomeprazole (Nexium) are formulated as delayed-release capsules containing enteric-coated drug granules.1417 Gastric acid dis-
solves the delayed-release capsule during transit of the dosage form. The enteric-coated granules are delivered to the small intestine, the base-labile coating dissolves, and drug is absorbed.1417 Pantoprazole (Protonix) and rabeprazole (Aciphex) are formulated as entericcoated, delayed-release tablets; the coating dissolves in the stomach and drug is absorbed in the intestine.18,19 Several studies have evaluated methods for giving omeprazole and lansoprazole through enteral tubes.2022 Crushing the entericcoated granules results in tube clogging from the enteric coating.1416 Instead the granules should be mixed with an appropriate diluent, such as apple or orange juice, to ensure that maximal amounts of drug reach the duodenum. To accomplish this, different methods must be used depending on the type of feeding tube in place and its location in the GI tract (see Appendix A).2024 In patients with a large-bore NG or G tube (18 French or larger), mix the intact granules with acidic fruit juice, pour the mixture down the tube, then flush with additional juice. The fruit juice protects the base-labile granules until they reach the small intestine, ensuring maximal drug delivery. Suitable juices include apple, cranberry, grape, orange, pineapple, prune, tomato, and V-8 juice.1416,2024 In patients with an intestinal feeding tube, give oral PPI suspensions. Oral suspensions of lansoprazole 3 mg/mL or omeprazole 2 mg/mL may be prepared by dissolving the unencapsulated, intact granules in sodium bicarbonate 8.4% solution.1416,2024 Because the intact granules dissolve incompletely in acidic fruit juice, oral suspensions may also be used in
patients with small-bore G tubes (less than 18 French), although the amount of drug absorbed may be reduced. For maximal effectiveness, give oral PPI suspensions into the intestine and intact granules into the stomach.20,21,25 Lansoprazole is also available as a packet of granules that are mixed with water before administration to form a suspension.26 However, this product is not appropriate for administration via enteral tubes. The formulation contains xanthan gum, an ingredient that increases the suspensions viscosity and causes it to expand within the feeding tube, increasing the risk of tube blockage.27 There is no information about administering esomeprazole (Nexium), pantoprazole (Protonix), or rabeprazole (Aciphex) via feeding tubes. Because esomeprazole is formulated similarly to omeprazole and lansoprazole, it may be reasonable to give esomeprazole either as intact granules or an oral suspension.17 Because pantoprazole and rabeprazole are enteric-coated tablets and cannot be split, chewed, or crushed, these medications cannot be administered via feeding tubes.18,19 Laxatives Bulk-forming laxatives, such as methylcellulose or psyllium (Metamucil), should not be given via feeding tubes.6,15 These products form a semisolid mass that may occlude the feeding tube when mixed with less than 250 mL fluid. Even when mixed properly, the resultant viscous solutions may block feeding tubes. In one study, clogging occurred in 33% of patients given psyllium via the enteral feeding tube, necessitating tube replacement.11 Similarly, cholestyramine (Questran), a bile acid sequestrant, may clog small-
230
bore feeding tubes.9 Consider using a fiber-containing enteral nutrition formula (eg, Jevity, Pediasure with fiber, or Promote with fiber) in patients who require additional dietary fiber for laxative effects.28 CONSIDERATIONS WITH LIQUID MEDICATIONS Liquid dosage forms are preferable if medication must be given via the enteral feeding tube. The medication dosage or frequency may need adjustment when switching from solid to liquid preparations.9 For example, phenytoin capsules are extended-release products and may be given once daily; phenytoin suspension is an immediate-release product and must be dosed 2 to 4 times daily. Extended-release diltiazem tablets may be given once daily, but immediate-release diltiazem tablets must be given 4 times daily.29 In some cases, the feeding rate or schedule must be adjusted to maintain adequate nutrition, especially if enteral feedings are interrupted several times daily for medication administration.5,9 Many commercial liquids have osmolalities well over 1000 mOsm/kg (see Table 3).5,30 The osmolality of GI secretions ranges from 100 to 400 mOsm/kg. Diarrhea, cramping, abdominal distention, and vomiting may occur after administration of hyperosmolar products through the feeding tube.3,5 These effects may be reduced by diluting medication with 10 to 30 mL of sterile water before administration.5,11,12 The osmolality of the resulting mixture may be calculated using the formula: Osmolality of diluted mixture = (Osmolality of drug x Volume of drug)/Total volume of mixture.31 Sterile water contains no solute and does not contribute to the
Note: These preparations require dilution with 10 to 30 mL sterile water prior to administration via the feeding tube. *Adapted with permission from Dickerson RN, Melnick G30
Hospital Pharmacy
231
mixtures osmolality.32 Inactive ingredients or excipients in liquid products may also cause side effects when given enterally. Ingredient-related diarrhea may occur in up to 50% of patients.33 Many sweeteners, including mannitol, lactose, saccharin, and sucrose, may cause or worsen diarrhea. However, the excipient most likely to cause GI problems is sorbitol.5,11,34 A poorly absorbed polyalcohol sugar, sorbitol is used therapeutically as a laxative in doses of 7.5 to 30 g.15 It is added to many liquid products to sweeten solutions, improve solution stability, and to provide a vehicle for medication.5,34 Sorbitol frequently causes gas and bloating at total daily doses of 10 g, while cramping and diarrhea occur with 20 g/day.34 Table 4 lists the sorbitol content of various medications. The list is not comprehensive, because sorbitol content varies by manufacturer and by drug concentration. While many preparations contain only small amounts, sorbitols effects are cumulative, based on the total daily dose. Patients receiving multiple drugs containing sorbitol are more likely to experience adverse reactions. Minimize risk by avoiding sorbitol-containing agents whenever possible.11,12,34 Sudden-onset diarrhea due to sorbitol or hyperosmolar medications is not a reason to discontinue tube feeding, but may suggest the need for changes in medications or administration routes.11,12,34 DRUG INTERACTIONS AND INCOMPATIBILITY Some medications may not be administered with enteral formulas because they form precipitates that may clog the feeding tube and reduce drug absorption (see Table 5). Syrups and other acidic medica-
tions (pH less than 4) may clump when mixed with enteral feeding formulas. In most cases, these interactions may be avoided by stopping the enteral feeding for 1 to 2 hours before and 2 hours after drug administration.9,10,35,36 To avoid compromising nutritional status, minimize the amount of time that feeding is interrupted by using once daily or twice daily dosage regimens.9,10 Nutrient intake is reduced 12.5% to 17% with once daily dosing and 25% to 33% with twice daily dosing, unless the feeding rate is increased. Phenytoin Phenytoin absorption decreases dramatically when given with enteral nutrition, reducing serum levels by 50% to 75%.5,37 The clinical effect of this interaction may be decreased by interrupting tube feeding for 2 hours before and after each dose, in addition to flushing the tube before and after each phenytoin dose.5,9 Maintain adequate nutrition by placing the patient on a twice daily phenytoin regimen and gradually increasing the feeding rate to account for the lost time. Monitor serum levels closely, especially once the patient begins oral intake. Warfarin Warfarins effects may decrease in patients receiving enteral feeding, due to reduced absorption and vitamin K antagonism. Warfarin absorption may be decreased by drug binding to components of the enteral feeding solution. Vitamin K is found in most enteral formulas and directly blocks warfarins effects when given in doses of 140 to 500 mcg/day, a level that may be reached in patients receiving large volumes of tube feeds.5,3841 Monitor prothrombin time carefully in patients requiring anti-
coagulation. Consider increasing the warfarin dose or using alternate anticoagulants (heparin, lowmolecular weight heparin). When the patient is switched from enteral feeding to oral or parenteral feeding, it may be necessary to reduce the warfarin dosage. Fluoroquinolones The pharmacokinetics of some fluoroquinolone antibiotics [ie, ciprofloxacin (Cipro), levofloxacin (Levaquin), ofloxacin (Floxin)] may change erratically when given via NG tubes or J tubes in patients receiving enteral feeds.4247 Peak concentrations decrease and the time to peak increases, changes that may alter antimicrobial efficacy and adversely affect patient outcomes.4246 The bioavailability of ciprofloxacin varies from 31% to 82% when given via the NG tube in patients receiving continuous enteral feeding. Although there is wide variability among patients, peak concentrations and overall drug exposure tend to be lower with administration via NG tubes.47 The mechanism for these changes is not well-understood, although it may be caused by fluoroquinolone binding of divalent cations in the enteral feeding formula.42-45,48 To reduce the interaction, fluoroquinolones should not be given within 2 hours before or 4 hours after enteral formulas. Although studies have only evaluated three agents (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, ofloxacin), the interaction is likely a class effect of all fluoroquinolones, including gatifloxacin (Tequin), due to their similar chemical structures and drug interaction profiles.15,49 To ensure efficacy, avoid giving fluoroquinolones via enteral feeding tubes or concomitantly with enteral formulas. Instead, adminis-
232
Strength (per mL) 32 mg 135 mg 6.3 mg A/23.9 mg M 45 mg A/40 mg M 120 mg A/60 mg M 10 mg 0.25 g 20 mg 0.208 g 100 mg 60 mg 0.5 mg D/0.005 mg A 125 mg 8 mg 10 mg 20 mg 5 mg 1.6 mEq 2 mg 1 mg 3.2 mg 4 mg 1.33 mEq 6 mg 6 mg P/0.25 mg T 12 mg 15 mg 250 mg 40 mg S/8 mg T 25 mg 5.33 mg 30 mg 50 mg 50 IU
Sorbitol (% w/v) < 20 10.5 7.3 4.5 15 72 18.2 17 40 3.5 46.1 21 30.9 28 30 10 <1 54 14 26 20 12.8 17.5 5 49 14 10 23.5 10 23 45.5 21 15 20
Average Adult Dose (per day) 1.3 3.9 g 15 180 mL 15 180 mL 15 180 mL 15 180 mL 200 mg 13 15 g 400 1200 mg 110 260 g 40 300 mg 800 mg 5 20 mg D 975 mg 20 80 mg 20 80 mg 1.2 3.2 g 75 150 mg 900 1800 mg 40 120 mg 10 15 mg 12 24 mg 30 120 mg 16 100 mEq 240 360 mg 240 360 mg P 600 mg 150 300 mg 15 60 g 1600 mg S 12g 150 600 mg 200 800 mg 14g 200 400 IU
Sorbitol Dose (g/day) < 8 24 1.6 18.9 1.1 13.1 0.7 8.1 2.2 27 14.4 9.5 10.9 3.4 10.2 211.0 499.2 0.01 0.1 6.1 2.1 8.4 2.4 1.2 4.0 13 6.0 16.0 0.2 0.5 8.1 16.2 1.7 5 2.6 3.9 0.8 1.5 1 3.8 2.1 13.1 14 21 19.6 29.4 7 12 14.1 56.4 4 9.2 18.4 12.8 51.2 1.4 5.6 3 12 0.8 1.6
Hospital Pharmacy
233
tablet and the contents of one Viokase or Cotazym capsule. Both products contain lipase 8000 units, amylase 30,000 units, and protease 30,000 units.31,49,55 Cranberry juice and carbonated colas have been used in the past to restore the patency of occluded tubes.2,9,53,54 However, these liquids are acidic and may actually contribute to tube occlusion by denaturating proteins in the enteral formulas.9,57 SUMMARY Drug therapy need not be compromised in patients receiving enteral nutrition. Careful selection and preparation of dosage forms reduces the complications of drug administration. Properly flushing the feeding tube and screening for incompatibilities lowers the risk of tube clogging and the need for replacement. REFERENCES
1. Rollins CJ. Adult enteral nutrition. In: Koda-Kimble MA et al, eds. Applied Therapeutics: The Clinical Use of Drugs. 6th ed. Vancouver: Applied Therapeutics; 1995, 34.128. 2. Belknap DC, et al. Administration of medications through enteral feeding catheters. Am J Crit Care. 1997;6(5):38292. 3. Silberman H. Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. 2nd ed. Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange; 1989, 11758. 4. Rombeau JL, Caldwell MD, eds. In: Clinical Nutrition: Enteral and Tube Feeding. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1990. 5. Estoup M. Approaches and limitations of medication delivery in patients with enteral feeding tubes. Crit Care Nurse. 1994;14:6872,79. 6. Gora ML, et al. Considerations of drug therapy in patients receiving enteral nutrition. Nutr Clin Pract. 1989; 4:10510. 7. Klein S, Fleming CR. Enteral and parenteral nutrition. In: Sleisenger MG, et
ter the drugs parenterally in patients who cannot take oral medications. If a fluoroquinolone must be given via the feeding tube, crush the tablets and mix in 20 to 60 mL sterile water immediately before giving.4247,50 Adjust the feeding rate to compensate for the lost time.5,9,10 Ciprofloxacin suspension should never be given via the feeding tube, since its thick consistency may clog the tube. In addition, the oil-based suspension does not mix with aqueous solutions and cannot be easily flushed with water.51,52 CLOGGED FEEDING TUBES Medications cause occlusion in approximately 15% of patients with enteral feeding tubes.2,9 Sever-
al mechanisms for managing clogged feeding tubes are outlined in Appendix B. Before removing the tube, attempt to clear the obstruction with warm water and gentle pressure.11,5355 If the feeding tube remains clogged, flush the tube with carbonated water, Clog Zapper, or alkalinized enzyme solution.11,55,56 Clog Zapper is a commercial product containing papain, amylase, and cellulase that may be used for occlusions caused by enteral formulas. Because Clog Zapper has not been evaluated for drug-related occlusions,56 alkalinized enzyme solution should be used in these cases. To prepare the solution, crush one sodium bicarbonate 324 mg
234
al, eds. Gastrointestinal Disease: Pathophysiology Diagnosis Management. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1993, 206296. 8. Schuffler MD, Sinanan MN. Intestinal obstruction and pseudo-obstruction. In: Sleisenger MH, et al, eds. Gastrointestinal Disease: Pathophysiology Diagnosis Management. 5th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1993, 898916. 9. Thomson FC, et al. Managing drug therapy in patients receiving enteral and parenteral nutrition. Hosp Pharmacist. 2000;7:15564. 10. Gilbar PJ. A guide to enteral drug administration in palliative care. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1999;17:197207. 11. Rombeau JL, Caldwell MD, eds. Clinical Nutrition: Enteral and Tube Feeding. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1997. 12. Janson DD, Chessman KH. Enteral nutrition. In: DiPiro JT et al, eds. Pharmacotherapy: A Pathophysiologic Approach. 5th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2002, 2495517. 13. Mitchell JF. Oral dosage forms that should not be crushed or chewed. Hosp Pharm. 2002; 37:21314. 14. Personal communication. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck; 1994. 15. AHFS Drug Information 2002. Bethesda, MD: American Society of Health-System Pharmacists; 2002. 16. Personal communication. Lake Forest, IL: TAP Pharmaceuticals; 1996. 17. Nexium (esomeprazole) [package insert]. Wilmington, DE: AstraZeneca; 2001. 18. Aciphex (rabeprazole sodium) delayed-release tablets package insert. Teaneck, NJ: Eisai Pharmaceuticals; 2000. 19. Protonix (pantoprazole sodium) delayed-release tablets [package insert]. Philadelphia, PA: Wyeth; 2001. 20. Sharma VK, et al. Oral pharmacokinetics of omeprazole and lansoprazole after single and repeated doses as intact capsules or as suspensions in sodium bicarbonate. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2000;14:88792. 21. Song JC, et al. A prospective study of
simplified omeprazole suspension for the prophylaxis of stress-related mucosal damage. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2001;58:68994. 22. Sharma VK, et al. Simplified lansoprazole suspensiona liquid formulation of lansoprazoleeffectively suppresses intragastric acidity when administered through a gastrostomy. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:18137. 23. Zimmermann A, et al. Alternative methods of proton-pump inhibitor administration. Consult Pharm. 1997;12:9908. 24. Phillips JO, et al. A prospective study of simplified omeprazole suspension for the prophylaxis of stress-related mucosal damage. Crit Care Med. 1996;24:1793800. 25. Omeprazole nasogastric administration (Drug Consult). In: Hutchison TA, Shahan DR, eds. Drugdex System. Greenwood Village, CO: Micromedex. (Edition expires September 30, 2002). 26. Prevacid (lansoprazole) delayedrelease capsules and Prevacid (lansoprazole) for delayed-release oral suspension [package insert]. Lake Forest, IL: TAP Pharmaceuticals; 2002. 27. Safety briefs. ISMP Medication Safety Alert! 2002;7(12):12. 28. Product reference guide. Deerfield, IL: Nestle Clinical Nutrition; 2001. 29. Hutchison TA, Shahan DR, eds. Drugdex System. Greenwood Village, CO: Micromedex (Edition expires September 30, 2002). 30. Dickerson RN, Melnik G. Osmolality of oral drug solutions & suspensions. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1988;45:83234. 31. Jew RK, et al. Osmolality of commonly used medications and formulas in the neonatal intensive care unit. Nutr Clin Pract. 1997;12:15863. 32. Sterile water for injection. In: USP24/NF 19 The United States Pharmacopeia/The National Formulary. Rockville, MD: United States Pharmacopeial Convention; 1999, 1753. 33. Klang MG. Medicating tube-fed patients. Nursing. 1996;26:18. 34. Lutomski DM, et al. Sorbitol content of selected oral liquids. Ann Pharmacother. 1993;27:26974.
35. Burns PE, et al. Physical compatibility of enteral formulas with various common medications. J Am Diet Assoc. 1988;88:10946. 36. Cutie AJ, et al. Compatibility of enteral products with commonly employed drug additives. JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr. 1983;7:18691. 37. Bauer LA. Interference of oral phenytoin absorption by continuous nasogastric feedings. Neurol. 1982:32:5702. 38. Kutsop JJ. Update on vitamin K1 content of enteral products [letter]. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1984;41:1762. 39. Landau J, Moulds RFW. Warfarin resistance caused by vitamin K in intestinal feeds [letter]. Med J Aust. 1982;2634. 40. Watson AJM, et al. Enteral feeds may antagonise warfarin. BMJ. 1984;288: 557. 41. Parr MD, et al. Effect of enteral nutrition on warfarin therapy [letter]. Clin Pharm. 1982;1:2746. 42. Healy DP, et al. Ciprofloxacin absorption is impaired in patients given enteral feedings orally and via gastrostomy and jejunostomy tubes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:610. 43. de Marie S, et al. Bioavailability of ciprofloxacin after multiple enteral and intravenous doses in ICU patients with severe gram-negative intra-abdominal infections. Intensive Care Med. 1998;24:3436. 44. Wright DH, et al. Decreased in vitro fluoroquinolone concentrations after admixture with an enteral feeding formulation. JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr. 2000;24:428. 45. Cohn SM, et al. Enteric absorption of ciprofloxacin during tube feeding in the critically ill. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996;38:8716. 46. Mueller BA, et al. Effect of enteral feeding with Ensure on oral bioavailabilities of ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:21015. 47. Mimoz O, et al. Pharmacokinetics and absolute bioavailability of ciprofloxacin administered through a nasogastric tube with continuous enteral feeding to critically ill patients. Intensive
Hospital Pharmacy
235
Care Med. 1998;24:104751. 48. Cipro (ciprofloxacin) and enteral nutrition [written communication]. West Haven, CT: Bayer; 2001. 49. Drug Facts and Comparisons. St. Louis, MO: Facts & Comparisons; 2002. 50. Crushing tables/enteral feeds Levaquin (levofloxacin) [written communi-
cation]. Raritan, NJ: Ortho-McNeil; 2001. 51. Cipro (ciprofloxacin) [package insert]. West Haven, CT: Bayer; 2000. 52. Cipro (ciprofloxacin) oral suspension [written communication]. West Haven, CT: Bayer; 2002. 53. Marcuard SP, et al. Clearing obstructed feeding tubes. JPEN J Par-
enter Enter Nutr. 1989;13:813. 54. Bommarito AA, et al. A new approach to the management of obstructed enteral feeding tubes. Nutr Clin Pract. 1989;4:1114. 55. Bailey K. Management of phytobezoars and clogged feeding tubes. Pharmacy Newsletter. (Thomas Jefferson University Hospital) 1994;12:13.
236
56. Clog Zapper information. Wheeling, IL: Corpak Medsystems; 2002. 57. Guenter P. Administering medications via feeding tubes: What consultant pharmacists need to know. Consult Pharm. 1999;14:414, 478. 58. Mosbys GenRx. 11th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Incorporated; 2001.
59. Medication administration. In: DeLaune SC et al, eds. Fundamentals of Nursing: Standards and Practice. 2nd ed. Clifton Park, NJ: Delmar/Thomson Learning; 2002, 673740. 60. Administering medications. In: Potter PA, et al, eds. Basic Nursing: A Critical Thinking Approach. 4th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1999:596670.
61. Beckwith MC, Tyler LS, eds. Cancer Chemotherapy Manual. St. Louis, MO: Facts and Comparisons; 2001. 62. Engle KK, Hannawa TE. Techniques for administering oral medications to critical care patients receiving continuous enteral nutrition. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1999;56:14414.
Hospital Pharmacy
237