0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views3 pages

From M.A-p155.docx (Page 155

Uploaded by

asadullahjac
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views3 pages

From M.A-p155.docx (Page 155

Uploaded by

asadullahjac
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

go

Here is the English translation of the extracted texts from under the screenshots in the selected
files:

From M.A-p155.docx (page 155):


His blood could not cleanse, and there is no sin whose penalty He did not pay, nor any
punishment for sin that He did not bear. Obviously, the special punishment for sinners is hell,
which must be endured for the full punishment. On page 92 lines 14-15 of the same book, the
explanation of punishment is written: "The pious enter the place of rest immediately upon death,
and the impious fall into hell immediately." This also clearly shows that Jesus took all sins upon
Himself and bore the punishment of hell. And on page 291 line 2 of the book "The Baptism of
Adults," the Christian belief attributed to Jesus is written: "He was crucified and died and was
buried and descended into hell." Now, from all these passages, it is clear that Christ went to hell
and endured all punishments. Christians also believe that the punishment of the cross was only
for a few hours, but the curse remained for three days after death. It is clear that during the
days of the curse, Jesus must have endured some suffering, and that suffering was nothing but
hell. Moreover, since it was Jesus’s duty to endure punishment and fulfill God’s justice, then if He
only endured the pain of the world for a few hours and did not go to hell, then how will God’s
justice be fulfilled? According to Father Imaduddin’s commentary on the Gospel of Matthew,
"God left Christ’s heart to fully accomplish His justice," meaning Jesus’s heart darkened due to
the curse. The commentary in the book "Acts" titled "Tadhkiratul Abrar" published in 1879 by
the American Mission Press, Ludhiana, says about Christ: "Thanks be to the Lord Christ who
took all the curses of the law upon Himself in His crucifixion and liberated us who believe in Him
from the curse of the law, for we were all truly cursed and that curse was upon us forever. We
could never get out from beneath it because we were helpless and weak, but He became cursed
for us."

From M.A-p152.docx (page 152):


... Do not regard all the holy prophets as sinners and wicked from Adam to the end. The other
possibility for the crucifixion of this merciful Son is to consider His crucifixion as the decisive
cause that everyone who believes in His crucifixion will be saved from carnal sins and
immoralities and that their carnal desires will not manifest. But unfortunately, as the first
hypothesis was proven contrary to civility and clearly false, so is this hypothesis outright false.
Because if it is assumed that believing in Jesus’s atonement has the property that whoever has
true faith in it becomes like an angel and afterward does not even think about sin, then one must
say that all previous prophets did not believe in Jesus’s crucifixion and atonement, because
according to Christians they did excessive sins. Thus, it is clear that this false atonement cannot
save anyone from carnal desires. It also did not save Christ Himself. See how He followed Satan
even when it was not appropriate, and probably because of this He became repentant. When
someone called Him good, He stopped them saying, "Why do you call me good?" Indeed, a
person who followed Satan cannot dare to say he is good. It is certain that Jesus distanced
Himself from being called good because of His thoughts and other reasons, but unfortunately
Christians have not only called Him good but have made Him God. In short, Christ’s atonement
did not benefit Him either. Pride and vanity, which are the roots of all vices, seem to have
affected Jesus because He, by calling Himself God, labeled all prophets as robbers, cheats, and
impure persons, even though it appears from His own words that He Himself was not good. But
alas, pride destroyed His whole condition. No good person criticizes the previous elders, but He
named the pure prophets as robbers and cheats. His tongue labeled others as faithless sinners
all the time. He never used the word respectful for anyone because the son of God insulted
others repeatedly. And when we see the effect of Jesus’s atonement on the hearts of His
disciples, what is...

From M.A-p153.docx (page 153):


... Believed in Him and turned away from sin. Then the house of purity still seems empty at that
place. It is clear that the people believed after hearing the news of the crucifixion but even so,
Peter cursed Him openly at His arrest. So far, sin has not stopped, everyone ran away, and the
light of belief remained in no one’s heart. Afterward, the state of not stopping sin continues.
European researchers admit that in Europe immorality is so rampant that in London alone
thousands of illegitimate children are born every year, and so many filthy incidents have been
published in Europe that they are unmentionable. Drinking is so widespread that if you place two
wine shops on a straight line, they probably won’t close even after two stops of a traveler.
Worship is neglected, and day and night there is nothing but debauchery and worldliness. So
this investigation proves that Jesus’s crucifixion did not make His believers abstain from sin, but
instead, just like a broken dam that causes a violent river to destroy surrounding villages, so is
the state of those who believe in the atonement. And I know Christians won’t argue much
because if Jesus’s atonement didn’t stop the behavior of those prophets who had God’s angel,
then how could it stop traders, professionals, and dry priests from impure acts? In short, the
condition of Christians’ God is as we have stated.

From M.A-p154.docx (page 154):


... For three days He is in Hades. Siraj-ud-Din in the answers to four Christian questions in Ruhani
Khazan volume 12 page 331 says truthfully that since Christians abandoned God and placed the
crown of divinity on the head of a weak man, they have become blind and see nothing. On one
hand, they make Him God, on the other hand, they crucify Him and curse Him, then send Him to
Hades for three days. Did He go to advise the damned in hell or to atone for them? Malfoozat
volume 3 pages 167-168 mention some Christians say Jesus descended into hell and preached
to the prisoners there, but any wise person can ask what was the need for the cursed days; did
He go to endure punishment or to preach? What advice can a cursed one give another? And
what benefit will preaching to the wicked do? Everyone understands the right path, and if
understanding is something, then no one can remain in hell. The Books Al-Bariyah Ruhani Khazan
volume 13 page 288 margin to margin prove Jesus’s descent into hell. Commentary on Gospel of
Matthew Khazana Jesus’s Birth Secrets by Father Imad-ud-Din page 498 states "All God's
wrath caused by sin (God forbid) fell on Him." Now it is clear that this wrath is what others call
hell. Then in the 22nd line of the same Khazana regarding Christ it quotes Psalm 6:8: "You have
put me in the depths of the pit, in the dark places, in the depths of the earth." Obviously, these
dark places mean hell for Christians. Then the book Jamiat-ul-Faraid published American
Mission Press Ludhiana 1862 page 63 lines 16-17 says about Christ: "Because there is no sin
whose...

From M.A-p156.docx (page 156):


... Curse He bore upon Himself and delivered us from it, and He came out from under this curse
on the third day. Now the truth about Christian justice is revealed that eternal curse for others
but only three days for the Son. We have stated that even one minute of curse turns one into
Satan. As written in Jamiat-ul-Faraid page 92: "Satan will be with the armies of these
unbelievers." Nevertheless, Christians believe that for the three days of the curse, Jesus
endured the suffering of hell. And the book "Raah-e-Zindagi" published Allahabad 1850 page
69 line 8 writes that "This punishment (meaning the punishment of sinners) is often referred to
as death, not only physical but also spiritual, not only worldly but also eternal." In the same book
"Raah-e-Zindagi" authored by Dr. Hodge D.D. from America, it is written that "Curse and death
and wrath and the punishment that sinners receive are one and the same," and to support this
belief further, it states "The demon said that the Ganges will never cast me into the fire of hell."
What kind of justice is it that the Son was given only three days of punishment, but the sentence
for others is eternal and endless; that the Son should suffer only three days while others burn
forever in the furnace of hell? Was it suitable for the merciful God to do this? The proper thing
would be to give the Son more punishment because due to His divine powers He could endure
more punishment. The strength of God’s Son can never be equal to the strength of others who
are poor and helpless creatures.

If further translation or extraction is needed, please let me know.

You might also like