Sorcery in the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church:
Historical Roots, Pastoral Crisis, and the Call for Reform
Fisseha Berhane, Ph.D.
HIST506: History of Ethiopic Christianity
Mehari Worku, Ph.D.
August 30, 2025
Confidential - Not for Public Consumption or Distribution
Berhane, 1
Few issues are as troubling—and as enduring—in the life of the Ethiopian Orthodox
Tewahedo Church (EOTC) as the quiet persistence of sorcery cloaked in religious authority.
Debteras1, often trained in traditional church schools including in monasteries, perform
exorcisms, create amulets, love magic, business magic, vindictive magic, and offer various forms
of spiritual healings. Despite the Church's explicit rejection of magical practice, these illicit
rituals remain common among some clergy and laity. Studies show that these unsanctioned
magical practices are rooted in a historical context where pre-Christian traditions and syncretic
religious ideas merged with early orthodox teachings, dating back to the Axumite Kingdom and
potentially to even earlier cultural and religious systems.
This paper examines the unsettling tension between orthodox doctrine and debteraic2
practice. It explores not only the theological contradictions these rituals present, but also the
social and moral complexities that allow them to endure. My aim is not merely to catalogue these
rituals but to ask a deeper question: What does their persistence say about the state of catechesis,
pastoral care, and spiritual accountability in the EOTC? I argue that this is not just a theological
issue but a spiritual crisis—one that calls not only for correction, but for renewal.
A. Historical Background
The intertwining of Christianity and esoteric practices in Ethiopia has a long and complex
history that predates even the formal establishment of the EOTC.3 From its early centuries,
Ethiopian Christianity developed in close contact with Jewish, Coptic and other Near Eastern
1
A debtera is a religious specialist within the Ethiopian and Eritrean Orthodox Tewahedo Churches, as well as
among the Beta Israel. While they participate in ecclesiastical functions such as chanting and teaching, debteras are
also known for engaging in practices outside the official teachings of the Church, including rituals, exorcisms, and
acts commonly described as sorcery or magic, which are not sanctioned by orthodox doctrine. The plural form of
debtera in Ge’ez is debater. However, for the purpose of simplicity and clarity, I will use debteras in this study.
2
For the purposes of this study, I use the term debteraic sorcery to refer to all occult practices performed by
debteras.
3
Kristen Windmuller-Luna, “Ethiopian Healing Scrolls,” Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History, The Metropolitan
Museum of Art, April 1, 2015, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/ethiopian-healing-
scrolls; Chernetsov, “Ethiopian Magic Texts,” 190.
Berhane, 2
traditions, many of which already contained elements of secrecy, angelology, demonology and
the use of divine names.4 These strands contributed to the formation of a uniquely Ethiopian
religious formation—one where the boundaries between orthodoxy and magic have often been
blurred.
The term debtera originally referred to highly trained church scholars, typically laymen,
who had undergone extensive education in liturgical music, Geʿez grammar, theology, poetry
and exegesis. Historically, debteras were respected as the intellectual elite of the Church, often
acting as scribes, cantors, astrologers, and teachers. By the medieval period, many debteras had
come to be associated with the crafting of talismans, the use of incantations, and the invocation
of angelic and demonic powers using asmat—secret names believed to hold spiritual efficacy.5
As Turaev observed in the early twentieth century, members of the clergy often profited
by copying and selling spurious prayers.6 Such practices contributed to a vast body of
“forbidden” writings, among which spells and incantations occupy a prominent place in
Ethiopian literary tradition.7 As Steven Kaplan has aptly remarked, “it is impossible to write
about religion in Ethiopia without writing about magic as well”.8
These practices were often justified using apocryphal texts or pseudo-Solomonic legends
that credited King Solomon with the divine knowledge of commanding spirits.9 This association
4
Ibid.
5
Getatchew Haile, “Spiritual Healing in the Ethiopian Orthodox Church,” in Science, Religion, and Society: An
Encyclopedia of History, Culture, and Controversy, ed. Arri Eisen and Gary Laderman, vol. 1 (Armonk, NY:
M.E. Sharpe, 2007), 633–41.
6
Turaev, B. A. “Abissinskie magicheskie svitki” [Abyssinian Magic Scrolls]. In Sbornik statei v chestʹ grafini P.
S. Uvarovoi, 173. Moscow, 1916
7
Krachkovsky, I. Yu. “Abissinskii magicheskii svitok iz sobraniya F. I. Uspenskogo” [An Abyssinian Magic
Scroll from the Collection of Fedor Ivanovich Uspensky]. Doklady AN SSSR, 163. Leningrad, 1928.
8
Steven Kaplan, “Magic and Religion in Christian Ethiopia: Some Preliminary Remarks,” Studia Aethiopica
(2004), 413–23.
9
Jacques Mercier, Ethiopian Magic Scrolls (New York: George Braziller, 1979).
Berhane, 3
with sacred kingship gave magical practices a sense of legitimacy among both clergy and laity,
even when such acts clearly violated orthodox teachings.
Theologically, the Church has long condemned sorcery and divination. Patristic sources
such as St. Basil and St. John Chrysostom condemned the use of spells and charms as demonic
distortions of divine grace.10 In the Ethiopian context, however, the Church's condemnation of
magical practices was frequently undermined by the very institutions that produced the debteras.
The same church schools and monasteries that taught Scripture also allowed for the circulation of
magical texts—whether under the guise of healing, protection, or hidden wisdom.11 This duality
has persisted into modern times, as contemporary ethnographic studies demonstrate that debteras
today often continue to function both as church assistants and magical service providers.12
Moreover, efforts to root out magic were rarely sustained, and many debteras simply
adapted by masking their practices with more theological language or relocating their services
outside the visible bounds of ecclesial authority.13 The debteras and other clergy, as the society’s
literate elite, have long been the ones who copy and distribute these magical texts.14
B. Sorceries Practiced
10
John Chrysostom, Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew, trans. George Prevost, in Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers,
vol. 10 (Peabody: Hendrickson, 1999); Basil the Great, Canonical Epistles, Canon 65 and Canon 72, in Nicene and
Post-Nicene Fathers, Series II, Vol. 8, ed. Philip Schaff and Henry Wace, trans. Charles F. H. Johnston (Peabody,
MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 1994), https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/3202217.htm.
11
Gidena Mesfin Kebede, “Ethiopian Abǝnnät Manuscripts: Organizational Structure, Language Use, and Orality”
(PhD diss., Universität Hamburg, 2017), https://ediss.sub.uni-hamburg.de/handle/ediss/7027.
12
Steven Kaplan, “Magic and the Church in Christian Ethiopia,” in Encyclopedia of Religion, ed. Lindsay Jones,
2nd ed. (Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA, 2005); Kebede, “Ethiopian Abǝnnät Manuscripts”; Malara,
"Sympathy for the Devil"; Chernetsov, “Ethiopian Magic Texts,” 188; Siena de Ménonville, “Approaching the
Debtera in Context,” Cahiers d’études africaines [online], no. 231–232 (2018), posted December 15, 2020, accessed
July 15, 2025, http://journals.openedition.org/etudesafricaines/22890;
https://doi.org/10.4000/etudesafricaines.22890; Reidulf Knut Molvaer, Socialization and Social Control in Ethiopia
(Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, 1995), 34, 44, 50, 67, 70, 111, 142, 259; Tadesse Tsega W/Silasse,
YeMenafistu Mender (Addis Ababa: Mereb Publishing, 2020); Tadesse Tsega W/Silasse, Gizotegnaw Gini (Addis
Ababa: Mereb Publishing, 2020); Tadesse Tsega W/Silasse, Menafistu Besheloko Wist (Addis Ababa: Abay
Publishing, 2021).
13
Haile, “Spiritual Healing”, 638.
14
Chernetsov, “Ethiopian Magic Texts,” 188.
Berhane, 4
The sorcerous practices associated with debteras in the EOTC are as diverse as they are
spiritually perilous. Although often hidden behind a facade of piety or cultural tradition, these
rituals span a wide spectrum—from healing to hexing, from spiritual invocation to demonic
manipulation. What makes this phenomenon particularly insidious is that these practices are not
carried out by external enemies of the Church, but by insiders: educated men who possess
liturgical training and sometimes even hold clerical positions.
Gidena Mesfin Kebede recorded that the manuscripts he gathered—from
debteras, monasteries and churches—contain incantations serving a range of illicit and demonic
purposes, encompassing both so-called white magic (aimed at personal gain or protection) and
black magic (intended to cause harm to others). Some of them are:
against an enemy (ለፀር), to induce illness (ለመስተሐምም), to gain wealth (ለሀብት), for head
protector (ለዓቃቤ ርእስ), love charm (ለመስተፋቅር), to induce strife (ለመስተፃልዕ), against thief
(ለሌባ), to inherit spiritual, especially evil characteristic and power (ለውርሻ), against
sharp pain (ለውጋት), to make the hands run i.e. speed while copying text (ለምርዋፀ ዕድ),
against difficult delivery (ምጥ ለጠናባት ሴት), against cattle death (ከብት ለሚሞትበት), against
impotence (ለዘሞተ እስኪት), for killing someone (ለመቅትል), to evict a person (ለመስተባርር), for
nullipara (ለመካን ሴት), to make someone mute (ምላስን ለማሰር), to make somebody’s back
hunch (ሰውን ጐባጣ ለማድረግ), undoing of charms (መፍትሔ ሥራይ), against evil eye (ለዓይነ
ወርቅ), against diarrhoea (ለተቅማጥ), to get a woman (ለአምጽኦ ብእሲት), to attract a demon,
wealth etc.(ለምስሀብ), among many others.15
In his article “Sympathy for the Devil: Secrecy, Magic, and Transgression among
Ethiopian Orthodox Debtera”, Diego Maria Malara provides detailed ethnographic accounts of
15
Kebede, “Ethiopian Abǝnnät Manuscripts” 5-6.
Berhane, 5
two debteras.16 The first debtera, a man in his fifties, had served as a church administrator for
over fifteen years.17 Due to the insufficiency of church income to sustain his livelihood, he
supplemented his earnings by offering spiritual healings.18 Malara’s interviews with several of
the debtera’s clients revealed that many believed his profound and esoteric knowledge enabled
him to perform illicit acts of magic.19
Furthermore, Malara notes that the debtera disclosed that some of the magical texts he
employed were also possessed by ordained priests.20 This aligns with a personal account shared
by a friend, whose father and grandfather were both priests in Tigray. He recounted that local
villagers would seek their help when cattle went missing, and in response, the priests would
perform a ritual chant using seven stones and instruct the seekers to throw the four stones in four
different directions and put the other three under their pillow. It is believed that by doing so, the
lost animals would be safeguarded from hyenas and other wild predators. Ethiopian journalist
Tadesse Tsega W/silase, who has worked as a journalist for over 20 years and holds a graduate
degree in folklore from Bahir Dar University, also documents in his book about the same
practices he learned while interviewing debteras in the northern part of Ethiopia.21
The second debtera interviewed by Malara openly expressed his aspiration to attain great
wealth through the summoning of demonic powers.22 Malara notes that the debtera acquired his
esoteric knowledge through instruction at numerous remote monasteries, noting that such
knowledge was transmitted both formally by teachers and informally among students, often
16
Ibid.
17
Ibid.
18
Ibid.
19
Ibid., 6.
20
Ibid., 6.
21
Tadesse Tsega W/Silasse, Gizotegnaw Gini (Addis Ababa: Mereb Publishing, 2020).
22
Ibid., 6.
Berhane, 6
contingent upon monetary payment.23 He emphasized that students were typically required to
study under multiple church teachers in order to gain access to a diverse range of debteraic
teachings.24
Unlike the first debtera, who exhibited no apparent remorse for his activities, Malara
records that the second debtera expressed an intention to repent and cease his magical practices
once he achieved great wealth.25 Malara further observes that, in many cases, the sources of
authorized ecclesiastical teachings and those of debteraic magical knowledge are many times the
same teachers and places of learning.26 This finding agrees with Kebede’s research.27
Siena de Ménonville explains in her studies that debtera operate in private settings—
homes, hillsides, or hidden huts—where they produce talismans and conduct consultations under
the veil of discretion.28 As she notes, nearly every person she interviewed in northern Ethiopia
had, directly or indirectly, been in contact with a debtera, but few would admit it publicly due to
the social and spiritual stigma.29
This matches Kebede’s observation that while debtera’s notebooks are revered for their
perceived power, they are also shrouded in moral ambiguity and rarely displayed in public.30
Ethnographic data further supports the prevalence of these practices. According to Alula
Pankhurst, about 80% of the Amhara population turns to spiritual healers—many of them
23
Ibid., 9.
24
Ibid., 9.
25
Ibid., 6, 10.
26
Ibid., 9
27
Gidena Mesfin Kebede.(2017). Ethiopian Abǝnnät Manuscripts: Organizational Structure, Language Use, and
Orality. [Doctoral dissertation, Universität Hamburg,Hamburg]. ediss.sub.hamburg. https://ediss.sub.uni-
hamburg.de/handle/ediss/7027
28
Siena de Ménonville, “Approaching the Debtera in Context,” Cahiers d’études africaines [online], no. 231–232
(2018), posted December 15, 2020, accessed July 15, 2025, http://journals.openedition.org/etudesafricaines/22890;
https://doi.org/10.4000/etudesafricaines.22890.
29
Ibid.
30
Kebede, Ethiopian Abǝnnät Manuscripts.
Berhane, 7
Church-trained debtera—for help with physical, emotional, or supernatural afflictions.31 In these
contexts, the line between priest and sorcerer is not just blurred—it is often functionally
irrelevant to those seeking healing or justice. Consistent with Pankhurst’s findings, my own
personal observations confirm that in Tigray as well, debteraic practices are widespread across
both urban and rural areas.
Moreover, it is not uncommon for priests themselves to direct their spiritual children to
debteras for assistance, further entrenching these practices within local religious life. Notably,
within the Washington, D.C. area alone, I have documented five instances in which priests
recently referred parishioners suffering from health issues to debteras. They refer to them as
merigeta or traditional medicine providers.
In his investigative works, W/silase offers a rare ethnographic window into the
clandestine practices of debteras and some monastic communities in northern Ethiopia. In
Yemenafstu Mender, Woldeselassie recounts extensive interviews conducted with debteras from
Bahir Dar to Gondar, documenting a wide range of ritual practices that starkly diverge from the
official teachings of the EOTC. He describes how debteras claim to assimilate/incarnate spirits
into their bodies and offer sacrifices to demons in order to obtain spiritual powers. These powers
are reportedly used to perform various forms of sorcery, including love spells, curses, and
financial enchantments. The author recounts a disturbing incident he personally witnessed: a
debtera, residing within a church in a small house built over a tomb, raped a young woman who
had sought his assistance for a love spell. The debtera justified his actions by claiming that the
spirits had instructed him to act in this way to ensure the spell’s efficacy.
31
Reidulf Knut Molvaer, Socialization and Social Control in Ethiopia (Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz Verlag,
1995), 34, 44, 50, 67, 70, 111, 142, 259.
Berhane, 8
In his second book, Gzotegnaw Jiini, W/silase investigates reports from northern
Ethiopian monasteries where certain monks are said to invoke a spirit known as Meshibe
Kidusan. Once possessed, these monks allegedly acquire the ability to heal and perform other
miraculous acts. However, W/silase also includes the testimony of a monk from the Waldiba
monastery, who emphasized that such practices are not representative of genuine monastic life.
According to this monk, true monasticism centers on prayer, fasting, contemplation, and
communion with God—not with spirits other than God Himself.
W/silase’s third book, Menafstu Besheleko Wəst, further explores these phenomena. He
interviews monks who speak positively of spiritual rituals involving books called Hilme Yosef
and Melka Nolawi, which they claim provides revelatory insight through dream visions and
spiritual possession. The same ritual are reportedly practiced by debteras, who use it to get
divine answers to both past and future questions. However, other monks and clergy whom the
author interviewed denounced them as a work of sorcery that has infiltrated into the Church.
Across all three volumes, W/silase documents numerous testimonies from both male and
female debteras. While a few acknowledge the controversial nature of their practices, the
majority claim that their knowledge is a divine gift reserved for a chosen few. In order to gain
access to these inner circles, W/silase embedded himself within the communities for extended
periods, building trust by offering gifts and establishing rapport—thus uncovering practices
rarely spoken of in public. In all his three books, he documented non-biblical practices debteras
use to get spiritual power such as various sacrifices, including blood, and other sinful acts that
please the demons.
Much of what was once unknown to many has become relatively well-known today, as
debteras now openly advertise their services on social media platforms—offering both white and
Berhane, 9
black magic—to their clients. Unfortunately, it is now common to see both church servants and
laypeople following sorcery-related ads from such debteras on social media platforms.
C. The Deceptive Strategies of Debteras in Justifying Magical Texts
Over time, debteras have developed calculated ways to disguise the nature of their texts,
making them appear pious to the unsuspecting.32 One common tactic is to cloak incantations in
the language of holiness. Many manuscripts open with invocations of the Holy Trinity, Christ,
angels, or saints, only to intermingle these names with unknown words and demonic names. The
aim is rhetorical camouflage: by beginning with what is sacred, the debtera lulls the reader into
thinking the content is Orthodox. Historians note that this pattern became more pronounced after
Emperor Zerayaqob’s fifteenth-century reforms, when stricter measures against sorcery
prompted practitioners to hide behind religious phrases.33 In theological terms, such misuse of
divine names violates the Second Commandment (Exod. 20:7) and, as St. John Chrysostom
warned, invites demonic influence through the profanation of what is holy.34
A second strategy is false attribution. Metshafe Qoprianos, for example, is linked by
debteras to St. Cyprian of Antioch—a saint who famously repented of sorcery and destroyed his
magical books. Debteras have composed magic books in his name for the Christians, for the
Jews and for the Muslims. To attach his name to an occult manual is to distort both history and
hagiography. A third ploy is the claim of possessing “secret knowledge from God,” reserved for
a spiritual elite and often tied to King Solomon’s wisdom.35
D. Why Christianity and Witchcraft Cannot Mix
32
Chernetsov, “Ethiopian Magic Texts”.
33
Haile, “Spiritual Healing”, 638.
34
John Chrysostom, Homilies on the Gospel of Saint Matthew, trans. George Prevost, in Nicene and Post-Nicene
Fathers, First Series, vol. 10, ed. Philip Schaff (New York: Christian Literature Company, 1888), Homily 23.
35
Chernetsov, “Ethiopian Magic Texts”, 192.
Berhane, 10
From its earliest days, the Church has rejected witchcraft, sorcery, and all occult arts as
utterly incompatible with the Gospel. Christianity rests on trust in God’s providence, obedience
to His will, and worship of Him alone. Witchcraft, by contrast, seeks to manipulate hidden
powers for personal ends. One is rooted in surrender, the other in control. To merge them is to
betray the covenant of baptism.
Scripture is unambiguous. The Mosaic Law commands, “You shall not permit a sorceress
to live” (Exod. 22:18), revealing how seriously God views such practices. King Manasseh’s use
of witchcraft provoked divine wrath (2 Chr. 33:6), and Saul’s consultation with the witch of
Endor sealed his rejection (1 Sam. 28). In the New Testament, St. Paul lists sorcery among the
“works of the flesh” barring entry to the Kingdom (Gal. 5:19–21).
E. Conclusion and Recommendations
One of the most damaging effects of debteraic sorcery is the erosion of trust between
clergy and laity. Rumors, or confirmed cases, of priests and chanters engaging in sorcery breed
suspicion toward all spiritual authority, driving some toward Protestant or charismatic groups
that openly denounce such practices. In addition, debteraic sorcery fosters a transactional
approach to God, replacing repentance, prayer, and sacramental grace with spells, rituals, and
offerings designed to secure wealth, relationships, or revenge. This reduces divine blessing to a
purchasable commodity.
The cumulative effect is a weakened witness: inside the Church, confidence in spiritual
shepherds erodes; outside, the Church appears compromised and unable to separate truth from
superstition. This demands clear teaching, moral courage, and reform. Bishops and clergy must
reject sorcery in both word and deed, strengthen theological formation, and lead the faithful back
Berhane, 11
to Christ, the sole source of healing, power, and peace. Copying, selling, and distribution of
magical texts by anyone in ministry must be prohibited.
In conclusion, this study has shown that sorcery in the EOTC is not merely a historical
curiosity but an enduring pastoral crisis rooted in deep historical and cultural entanglements. For
the sake of the faithful, and for the witness of the Gospel, the Church must choose the way of
Christ over the marketplace of charms. Reform is not optional; it is a matter of fidelity to the
Gospel and the survival of the Church’s spiritual integrity.
Bibliography
Basil the Great. The Letters and Canonical Epistles of St. Basil. In Nicene and Post-Nicene
Fathers, Series II, Vol. 8. Edited by Philip Schaff and Henry Wace. Translated by
Charles F. H. Johnston. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 1994. Originally
published 1895. Accessed July 16, 2025.
https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/3202217.htm.
Chernetsov, Sevir. “Ethiopian Magic Texts.” Forum for Anthropology and Culture 2 (2005):
188–200.
Chrysostom, John. Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew. In Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers,
Series I, Vol. 10. Edited by Philip Schaff. Translated by George Prevost. Peabody, MA:
Hendrickson Publishers, 1994. Originally published 1888. Accessed July 16, 2025.
https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/200141.htm.
de Ménonville, Siena. “Approaching the Debtera in Context.” Cahiers d’études africaines
[online], no. 231–232 (2018). Posted December 15, 2020. Accessed July 15, 2025.
http://journals.openedition.org/etudesafricaines/22890.
https://doi.org/10.4000/etudesafricaines.22890.
Berhane, 12
Gidena Mesfin Kebede.(2017). Ethiopian Abǝnnät Manuscripts: Organizational Structure,
Language Use, and Orality. [Doctoral dissertation, Universität Hamburg,Hamburg].243.
ediss.sub.hamburg. https://ediss.sub.uni-hamburg.de/handle/ediss/7027.
Haile, Getatchew. “Spiritual Healing in the Ethiopian Orthodox Church.” In Science, Religion,
and Society: An Encyclopedia of History, Culture, and Controversy, edited by Arri Eisen
and Gary Laderman, vol. 1, 633–41. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2007.
Kaplan, Steven. “Magic and the Church in Christian Ethiopia.” In Encyclopedia of Religion,
edited by Lindsay Jones, 2nd ed. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA, 2005.
Kaplan, Steve. "Magic and religion in Christian Ethiopia: some preliminary remarks." Studia
aethiopica (2004): 413-423.
Krachkovsky, I. Yu. “Abissinskii magicheskii svitok iz sobraniya F. I. Uspenskogo” [An
Abyssinian Magic Scroll from the Collection of Fedor Ivanovich Uspensky]. Doklady
AN SSSR, 163–67. Leningrad, 1928.
Malara, Diego Maria. “Sympathy for the Devil: Secrecy, Magic and Transgression among
Ethiopian Orthodox Debtera.” Ethnos 87, no. 3 (2022): 444–462.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2019.1707255.
Mercier, Jacques. Ethiopian Magic Scrolls. New York: George Braziller, 1979.
Molvaer, Reidulf Knut. Socialization and Social Control in Ethiopia. Wiesbaden: Otto
Harrassowitz Verlag, 1995.
Turaev, B. A. “Abissinskie magicheskie svitki” [Abyssinian Magic Scrolls]. In Sbornik statei v
chestʹ grafini P. S. Uvarovoi, 173–291. Moscow, 1916.
W/Silase, Tadesse Tsega. YeMenafistu Mender. Addis Ababa: Btsega Publisher, 2016.
W/Silase, Tadesse Tsega. Gizotegnaw Gini. Addis Ababa: Mereb Publishing, 2020.
W/Silase, Tadesse Tsega. Menafistu Besheloko Wist. Addis Ababa: Abay Publishing, 2021.
Windmuller-Luna, Kristen. “Ethiopian Healing Scrolls.” Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History. The
Metropolitan Museum of Art. April 1, 2015. Accessed July 15, 2025.
https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/ethiopian-healing-scrolls.