Road Safety Issues in India
Road Safety Issues in India
1
The Millennium School, Al Qusais, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
#
Advisor
ABSTRACT
Road safety mishaps are now considered a public health issue considering the economic and societal costs of
road accidents. The victims are the face of the incidents; however, the costs are borne by their families, society,
and countries. In this paper, we look at the need to bifurcate individual and authoritative responsibilities such
that our roads become a safer place for all. We focus on India as the case study region and study the various
government initiatives taken to improve the country's road safety. This research highlights the gaps and recom-
mends necessary solutions to decrease road traffic deaths and injuries. Further, we investigate how the respon-
sibilities must be shared amongst the various stakeholders, including the drivers and the leadership, placed at
two opposite ends to balance the changing aspects of road safety.
This paper aims to give recommendations for improving the road safety conditions in India per the local
context by analysing the three key questions:
a. What are the societal impacts of road traffic accidents?
b. To what extent does individual responsibility matter, and why can road safety not rely exclusively on
the drivers’ behaviour?
c. How and where do the authorities’ responsibilities change the road safety dynamics?
Introduction
Health, without injury or disability, is regarded by economists and public health specialists as an essential ele-
ment of human development in the present day. As a result it improves people's lives by allowing them to learn,
acquire skills, grow as individuals, and contribute to society.
A road safety program is designed to prevent road users from being killed or seriously injured. A ‘Safe
System’ approach to the road transportation system is built on the belief that “death and injury are unacceptable
and avoidable” (PIARC, WORLD ROAD ASSOCIATION, 2021). The origin of the concept is dated back to
Sweden and Netherlands in the 1980s and 1990s (International Transport Forum, 2016) when policymakers
believed that road users’ safety was their own responsibility and the authorities and policies were specifically
to influence their behaviour to act safely on roads at all times. To address the high number of road fatalities
globally, the International Transport Forum (ITF) in 2016 emphasized and extended visionary policies like
'Vision Zero' and 'Town Zero'.
Over the past decade, road safety incidents have increased worldwide. Several mitigation measures
taken by the governments and authorities may have aided in reducing the number but only by a fraction, and so
is the case in India. The target of achieving SDGs 3 and 11—ensuring healthy lives, reducing deaths by road
accidents, and providing safe, affordable, accessible and sustainable transport systems (United Nations, 2015)
were far from achievable by 2020. We may still have a chance to significantly alter the transportation scenario
over the next decade as a result of UN Global Road Safety Week promises.
Until recently, worldwide, and even now in developing countries, ‘roads’ as a concept are viewed as
space for movement. The absence of designated road space for different users gives the false pretence of a
‘shared space’. It is no news that motor vehicles predominantly rule the right of way (ROW) while shoving
other users towards the edge of the road, and sometimes, moving freely even then is unlikely for non-motorised
(NMT) users. Pedestrians, cyclists, and other NMT users are often considered vulnerable road users, since they
are at the mercy of the mighty vehicles moving at full speed. In proximity to motor vehicles, vulnerable road
users are perceived to be at higher risk of physical injury. Among other reasons, the absence of dedicated space,
poor physical protection, and uneven visibility are the prominent factors affecting the extent of vulnerability.
Compared to other road users, drivers (of motorized vehicles) are less likely to worry about their safety.
Instead, they are more to be expected to report feeling concerned about sharing the road with other road users
and not having enough space still. As there are still some roads that have designated footpaths, personal safety
is largely a concern for cyclists. As a result, they must share the right-of-way with vehicles that are constantly
speeding or overtaking. Drivers are frequently concerned about coming into contact with cyclists, pedestrians,
and other users of NMTs when those users are moving at a slower speed, and vehicles try to overtake, or when
those users are crossing the street at or before crossroads without a signal, and when pedestrians cross without
a designated crossing.
In different places, different concepts of road sharing are explored, such as equal sharing, priority on
the road, and responsibility for road safety. Despite this, there is still a constant overlap of attitudes and expe-
riences among road users. It is not uncommon for drivers to see cyclists as inconsiderate road users, contributing
to this concern. Even though most of the population and even policymakers are of the opinion that cars are
given priority on the road, there is a high level of support for equal road sharing and responsibility for road
safety. It has become a cultural norm that many believe should continue. However, research indicates that de-
spite some planners and designers being open to this change, many remain firmly convinced that cars should
remain first.
Over 50 million people suffer non-fatal injuries from road traffic crashes each year (World Health Organization,
2021). In its UN General Assembly resolution, the UN set targets to reduce accidents and fatalities resulting
from road traffic by 2030, based on the level of development of each country (SLoCaT, 2020). Only 50% of
the world's motor vehicles are in low- and middle-income countries, but they account for 90% of all road deaths
(World Bank, 2017). There is a large amount of research data to support the assumption that road accidents
cause compounded harm to individuals, households, and society. According to the World Bank, the majority of
road traffic injuries (RTIs) are responsible for mortality and long-term disability in the working-age population
(World Bank, 2017). Globally, children and young people in the age group mentioned are the primary victims
of road traffic accidents. The World Health Organization states that road traffic crashes cost almost 3% of a
country's gross domestic product (GDP) (World Health Organization, 2021).
Road traffic data in different countries come from many sources, such as the health sector, police, non-
governmental organisations, and academia. There have been cases where fatalities recorded by WHO were
different from those recorded by local authorities. To achieve the best results, data sources and systems should
be connected. Such better coordination is difficult to achieve in reality.
The importance of this can't be overstated since data play a crucial role in decision-making for road traffic
policies. Authorities must know the number of people dying on the roads with accurate location and reasons to
analyse the risk factors. A government can improve its targeting and monitoring of its efforts, for example, by
correlating the percentage of motorcycle riders wearing helmets with crashes associated with alcohol use. For
data to be accurate, it must be collected according to best practices and harmonised across sectors (such as
police and health). A good data collection system helps understand the problem's magnitude and provides a
basis for making better decisions. Moreover, good data can be used to measure policy and program effective-
ness. The underreporting of road traffic deaths is a fundamental problem in low- and middle-income countries.
Further, while road safety seems like an independent issue, it directly links with the country’s financial
and health authorities since the impact of road accidents is multilateral. A deeper dive into the repercussions
suggests that the health systems incur institutional costs of road fatalities. Simultaneously, the societal costs of
road injuries and deaths affect the victims and their families in the larger spectrum. Universal Health Coverage
recognition has long been correlated to curbing road traffic injuries (World Bank, 2017).
Economic Cost
As a result of road traffic injuries and fatalities, victims and their families suffer physically, psychologically
and financially. As well as direct costs, indirect costs such as loss of productivity, damage to vehicles and
property, and lowered quality of life must also be taken into account when calculating the actual cost to society.
Costing studies at the country level use several different methods, which makes it difficult to compare them
globally. Nonetheless, they highlight how road traffic crashes affect different sectors nationwide and help con-
vince policymakers to invest in prevention.
Globally, the primary victims of RTI aged 15-49 require costly trauma care (Pal, et al., 2019). A limited
amount of literature exists for South Asian countries that explores the economic burden of severe injury and
loss of earnings on severely injured and hospitalised RTI victims. Many road deaths are the result of vulnerable
road users. These road users are mostly victims of bad infrastructure, insufficient general awareness, and delib-
erate enforcement.
People, communities, and countries are adversely affected by road traffic injuries and deaths. They often over-
burden health care systems, add to scarcity of hospital beds, require dominant resource allocation, and result in
productivity losses. It is considered a “public health issue” (World Health Organization) and is expected to
worsen without proper action.
Road casualties are infamous to cause a ripple effect on families and dependents, pushing them into lower-
income bands and urban poverty. Road crash victims require constant cash input to hospital care and occupy
hospital beds longer than average patients (World Health Organization).
According to the World Bank (World Bank, 2017), GDP per capita in India can go up by 14.9% if only the
country could halve road deaths and injuries over the next 24 years. The calculations consider higher income
gains resulting from accumulated annual growth over time and considering the quality of life in terms of healthy
life expectancy, environment quality, drug abuse extent, and social services availability. It is closely connected
to the social discount rate used for measuring the rate at which society would be willing to trade present for
future consumption (Lopez, 2008).
Factors such as globalisation, migration, changing economic dynamics, income growth, and vehicle
availability have brought humans into contact with numerous new products that have changed the physical and
urban. In recent years, there have been an increasing number of deaths, hospitalizations, and disabilities caused
by road accidents in India. According to the UN Sustainable Development Goals, road traffic deaths should be
reduced to 12 in low-income countries by 2020, 7 in middle-income countries, and 4 in high-income countries
by 2020 (SLoCaT, 2020).
Sustainable transport planning balances the urban planning objectives standing on the sustainability
pillars of economic, social and environmental development (SLoCaT, 2020). Sustainable transport is vital for
providing low-income people with access to jobs and services and enabling their income-earning activities to
be safe, affordable, convenient and equitable. Much evidence states how improving accessibility (through
transport) reduces poverty, increases incomes and work opportunities, increases health facilities and reduces
mortality rates.
Road safety is usually associated with road traffic rules and regulations, which abide vehicular drivers
to follow set standards. However, there are minimal, if not none, traffic rules that work in favour of pedestrians
and cyclists in India. The only prominent ones we hear about are zebra crossings at every traffic junction and
providing a bare minimum of curb space between vehicles and footpaths. Even these are not present in their
entirety. Indian cities rarely consider pedestrians and cyclists in their traffic signal cycles and parking and shel-
ter provisions.
The above reasons explain why pedestrians and cyclists are often victims of road accidents. However,
they are not the only ones. Motor vehicles themselves are prone to road accidents when put in between vehicles
moving at speeds faster than their capacities and on roads not designed with the best safety measures in mind.
We have several rules for drivers, such as wearing seat belts and helmets, using indicators, passenger capacities,
stop lines, traffic signals, speed limits, etc. Whether or not they are enough is a totally different question. A
problem even more extensive than that is the mindset of people who do not abide by the traffic rules and often
become party to accidents on the roads.
Unfortunately, the country's socio-economic spectrum is diverse and highly divided. According to The
World Bank, disproportionately, RTIs affect the lower strata (2021). The latest numbers revealed 1.5 lakh
deaths due to road accidents on the roads in India (MoRTH, 2019). It is among the highest number of deaths
caused by RTIs in the world. Even though the country only has 1% of the world's vehicles, it accounts for over
10% of all road accidents (The World Bank, 2021). Most roads, as well as their design geometrics, are unac-
ceptably bad, except for a few arterials in and around major capitals and metro areas. Roads aren't built with a
good long-term vision, nor are they adaptable enough for more vehicles down the road in the next couple of
decades. The old-fashioned methods of maintaining roads, instead of focusing on a lower pollution approach,
are used. Moreover, poor households are often reported to have little or no access to health facilities and insur-
ance coverage. The delay in covering hospital costs and lost income exacerbates inequality, especially in urban
areas.
India has a complex driving culture; driving has always been hazardous, and recent statistics show it is getting
more dangerous as far as accidents, deaths, and injuries are concerned. Every year, 1.5 lakh people are killed in
road accidents, according to MoRTH (MoRTH, 2019). Despite the fact that the accounted number was 1.9%
less than in 2016, the accident severity, or the number of people killed by 100 accidents, has grown by 1.4%.
Below are a few reasons that can be listed as ‘Drivers’ Negligence’ that account for road crashes.
Over speeding
Accidents are caused by speeding - the faster a car travels, the more it impacts other vehicles. Fatality risk for
car occupants is 85% in car-to-car side impacts (World Health Organization, 2021). According to Pal, et al.,
2019 (Pal, et al., 2019), speed accounts for one-third of RTIs. The likelihood and severity of a crash increase as
speed increases. A 1% increase in average speed raises crash risk by four times, and a 3% increase raises severe
crash. Pedestrians are even more drastically impacted when they hit car fronts.
Under the Indian Motor Vehicles Act 1988, cars and motorcycles are restricted to driving at speeds of
100 km/h and 65 km/h, respectively. There is a need to implement remedial measures such as inclusive road
design, enforcing speed limits, establishing strategic cameras, and implementing traffic-calming measures.
Non-use of helmets
A study by the UN (Motorcycle Helmet Study 2016) highlighted that the death probability of motorised two-
wheeler riders in a road crash is 26 times more than four-wheelers. As per the WHO, correct helmet use can
reduce the risk of fatal injuries by 42% and that of head injuries by 69%. Other literature supported a reduction
in death by 50% and fatal injuries by over two-thirds with proper helmet use. A research study based in India
verified that only half of the two-wheeler riders in the country wear helmet and only 45% fastened seat belts
(Pal, et al., 2019).
It is known that traumatic brain injuries (TBI) are the most common cause of mortality, morbidity and
disability (Pal, et al., 2019). Thus, proper use of crash-proof helmets is a must for two-wheelers.
Distracted driving
According to WHO, drivers who use mobile phones while driving are four times more likely to be involved in
road crashes. As a result of gadget distraction, drivers are unable to stay in the right lane, pay attention to
vehicles coming from the other direction, assess and react to vulnerable users, follow traffic signals, and regu-
late vehicle speeds based on traffic conditions.
It is becoming increasingly common to fit audio visual entertainment, automated, or voice receptive
gadgets to vehicles. These may considerably reduce the monotony of long driving that may lead to distractions
and achieve the desired action. To address distracted driving, governments must take concrete steps to enact
stricter laws, fund community awareness campaigns, and collect data regularly.
Dedicated Road space and Road safety conditions for other users
All-Cause Mortality rate (aged 15-64) has decreased in India from 2000 to 2015. In the same period, for the
same age group, RTI Mortality has remained stagnant with no demonstration of a decrease in number (World
Bank, 2017).
The prominent observation of more male drivers than females is also reflected in RTIs. Men are vic-
tims of three out of four road deaths (World Bank, 2017), placing a direct burden on the family’s income and
livelihood in cases of the victim being the sole bread earner. It is a loop going back to RTIs being common
amongst earning population (since they travel more than the average) rather than spread across the population
strata.
The ‘shared space’ concept relies on equal distribution of space such that users can share roads. By
nature, the motorised vehicle has power over other road users in terms of size, force, protection, etc., since the
harm done to them is not on the same level as that done to pedestrians or cyclists. However, in the absence of
speed limits and traffic rules, motor vehicles will always stay the predominant user.
On a similar line of thought, cars dominate two-wheelers and buses and trucks dominate cars. The
hierarchy follows the simple rule of size in this matter. The other factors are directly related to how much space
the user occupies on the road. Safety is the most important aspect for everyone, not just 'vehicles' on city streets.
Structural changes and enforcement that promote behavioural changes are crucial to improving road safety. In
addition to ensuring the safety of non-drivers, proposed changes must promote equality on the road. Accord-
ingly, drivers must be on board with the proposed new rules that favour cyclists and other road userPedestrians
and cyclists account for half of the world's road fatalities.
The required hierarchy of road users will directly contradict the preference of vehicular drivers. It is
imperative to remember that changing the ROW dynamics affects how vehicle drivers navigate the roads. To
comply with the new proposed changes, pedestrians and cyclists need to pay extra attention while crossing the
roads and moving along. It is important to accept pedestrians, cyclists and NMT as considerate road users.
According to a UK study, cross-modal experiences can strengthen empathy towards vulnerable road users and
foster a greater appreciation for improved road safety (Department for Transport, GOV.UK, 2021).
Pedestrians, cyclists, and non-motorized transport users, who have been neglected in transportation
and planning policies, must be given the utmost attention to reduce traffic fatalities. By making walking and
cycling easier, we can achieve better health resulting from more physical activity. The indirect benefits of re-
duced air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions can also help achieve better health resulting from more phys-
ical activity.
In recent years, the Ministry of Road Transportation and Highways (MoRTH) has developed and implemented
various initiatives aimed at raising traffic awareness and improving road safety:
- Promotional Programs
- Organising road safety programs by providing grants-in-aid
- Scheme for National Highway Accident Relief
- Driver training for heavy vehicles
- National Highway Development Program
- NGOs are taking action at their level to address this issue.
- Road safety weeks and competitions are held in several cities by police departments.
- A Road Safety Cell of the ministry has created an awards scheme to be presented to organisations and
individuals for their outstanding contributions in the field.
The previous section listed the leading causes of road accidents in drivers' control. It is imperative to
look at the ‘Responsibilities Held by the Government and Authorities’ that can help avoid road fatalities:
Road Conditions
Indian road conditions are considered degraded except for national highways and politically active neighbour-
hoods. Potholes, unfilled-interrupted construction sites, failed signal lights, faded lane demarcations, missing
zebra crossings are only a few in the long list of road design aspects that the government should fulfil. It is
common in India to layer up the roads with concrete every few years to respond to the damage caused by natural
factors and/or vehicles.
Vehicle design
The vehicle manufacturing standards are low and broad. In addition, the Indian market acts in a money-oriented
manner, with manufacturers not caring enough about the civilian’s safety. A proper monitoring and evaluation
base is required for safer vehicle designs.
Law enforcement
Traffic police do not follow through with road traffic rules and regulations. They are often seen abusing their
power, indulging in bribes, and not giving much thought to rule-breaking from safety perspectives. It is the
need of the hour to educate the police on road safety along with the citizens.
Emergency services
The quick-response team in India is often short-handed and unable to reach multiple locations when in need.
Further, the limited hospital beds and medical staff often exacerbate the nightmare.
In order to improve road safety, WHO recommends that countries worldwide focus on five risk factors and two
additional aspects for injuries and deaths occurring on the road (World Health). For short-term interventions
such as law enforcement, awareness campaigns, and enforcement, cost-effectiveness plays a key role. For a
long-term solution, diverse stakeholders, vehicles, road users, and the environment must be considered.
A more comprehensive, robust, and effective road safety legislation is necessary to influence citizens'
behaviour and road usage. Globally, the WHO assesses laws and bills for gaps in defining priorities for city
roads for effective action. Moreover, WHO helps governments raise awareness about risk factors and dangerous
behaviours among road users so that the magnitude of road traffic deaths and injuries, as well as their impact
on public health and people's lives, can be reported.
It is one of the most debated topics in India today since traffic accidents are considered inadequately
reported. It is believed that only the accidents reported to the police or those leading to deaths are listed in the
road accidents database. Many other incidents where victims may have been injured but are not taken to the
hospital or the police station immediately are often left out of the records.
Motorcycle helmets are believed to reduce injury risks by over 70% and death risks by just under 40% (World
Health). It is possible to reduce head injuries by requiring helmets to meet recognized safety standards, to be in
good condition, and to be worn appropriately, e.g. not cracked and fastened appropriately. If motorcycle helmet
laws are enforced, over 90% of the citizens will wear helmets. Nevertheless, several developing nations, in-
cluding India, do not properly implement the law.
The lack of safety measures in low- and middle-income countries can cause more road traffic deaths.
However, there is no correlation between vehicle numbers and road deaths in countries that have made adequate
investments in road safety. While many high-income countries continue to motorize, road traffic fatalities have
decreased as a result of proper road safety measures.
The 4Es – four pillars of Road Safety were taken into account for a global comparative study of Road
Safety interventions worldwide. The following are some of the wider, commonly adopted practices to reduce
road accidents and fatalities:
- A statutory body with integrated and dedicated functions that provide ongoing expertise with utter
credibility to combat the rising threat of motor vehicle accidents and fatalities.
- Application of advanced ITS and AI technologies for traffic management.
- Guidelines and standards for designing, constructing, operating, and maintaining national highways.
- Various standards for providing trauma and medical care to traffic-related injured at various levels.
- Compliance with safety standards is regularly audited.
- Design and manufacture of vehicles must meet minimum safety standards.
- The rules governing traffic on the highways, including the schemes for segregating
- Developed procedures and centers for multidisciplinary crash investigations.
- Pay attention to the needs of women, children, seniors, persons with disabilities, and pedestrians in
regard to road space and movement.
- Collection and analysis of data for accident investigations, research, finance, or administration.
- Road safety education, traffic management, road users' behaviour, and trauma care and rehabilitation.
A number of reports from the 1980s state that the lack of investments in road design improvements, mainte-
nance, and enforcement have resulted in high vehicle deaths in LMICs (World Bank, 2017). The Indian scenario
has evolved over time, but the scales are still skewed in favour of wider roads and motor vehicles, overlooking
the needs of other road users, including micro mobility.
High-income countries attributed 30% of road fatalities to speed, while it is the primary cause of over
50% of fatalities in low- and middle-income. Braking distance is proportional to speed, so to determine 'safe
speed' we need to consider the road type, function, traffic mix and plausible traffic mix combinations.
The use of speed cameras for speed management is a cost-effective, efficient solution. Consistent enforcement,
deterrence, and reduced police intervention are some of the benefits of these tools. Since penalties do not have
to be collected at physical interception points, they can also prevent corruption. The proceeds from speed cam-
eras are also invested in making roads safer in countries where they are most effective.
In India, enforcement is majorly restricted to city limits only. There is no enforcing mechanism on national and
state highways. Over 50% of crashes and fatalities are recorded on the highways. It is thus necessary to have
proper enforcement protocols under the national and state highway authorities' purview as well as local author-
ities for city roads.
A comprehensive strategy is proposed under the National Road Safety Plan to tackle road safety issues
by use of effective enforcement techniques:
- Use of Intelligent Transportation Systems and Artificial Intelligence Technology for better and effi-
cient traffic management and enforcement
- Evidence-based & Contact Less Enforcement
- Use of scientific methods for collecting accident data for obtaining reliable data
- E-challan System, etc.
The following key performance indicators (KPIs) are suggested for monitoring, evaluating, and incen-
tivising the states’ initiatives and targets:
- Accident Severity (Fatalities per 100 crashes).
- Crash Density (crashes per km/yr).
- Fatality Density (fatalities per km/yr).
- Speed Violations cases booked per year.
- Avg. Total Response Time (Remote Point to Accident Location to Trauma Care Center).
- Several Road Safety Awareness Campaigns & Counselling Secessions conducted per Km per year.
A driving force behind the nation's economic growth and development is the transportation infrastructure and
the road users, vehicles, and road environments. Each of these elements play an important role in the national
development and growth of the nation. In terms of road safety, this combination of people, vehicles, and road
environments should be studied carefully with appropriate measures to ensure safety and smooth movement.
People make mistakes and are physically fragile, which is significant to road users when talking about
road safety. It is hence necessary to create a comprehensive system that shares responsibility between individ-
uals and designers (International Transport Forum, 2016) to ensure a fail-safe:
Human error
To err is human! Humans are not perfect and cannot always be the best of drivers. They can never perform
correctly in all traffic situations (International Transport Forum, 2016). It is thus crucial to keep in mind the
limitations of being a human, including considering external factors such as clear headspace, pressure, and
several other responsibilities of day-to-day life. Driving is often just seen as an activity done in order to reach
places for other purposes, and the act of driving rarely has its own purpose. Thus, it is pretty standard for people
to be distracted, rush, pay little attention to fellow drivers and road conditions while commuting. Although we
cannot change basic human nature, we can alter it for better decision making. Two important steps follow the
decision of behavioural change:
- relying on professionals and designers to abide by the adequate infrastructure and design standards,
and
- creating a sense of shared responsibility amongst the citizens and community.
Humans are not invincible, regardless of what they think. The human body can take up only so much force and
get damaged easily. We get bruises by something as small as a paper cut, and yes, while we can train our bodies
to get physically stronger and not get a scratch on the outside when hitting a wall, it puts pressure on the bones
inside, and we feel it just as equally. Imagine being hit by a vehicle twice your size, and besides, one that is
moving at speed capable of throwing you to the other end of the road—that is not safe! It will put a person in a
hospital bed if not kill them.
- Slowing vehicles down is therefore seen as one of the prevention measures. Speed limits and obstacles
together can reduce the crash impact considerably.
- Bifurcating vehicles as per size and energy is another successful approach. Dedicated lanes are thus
seen as a must on all types of roads.
Providing a safer road environment is at the core of creating a Safe System. Shared responsibility among de-
signers and drivers is a must to ensure ‘Zero Crashes’. As stated before, individual responsibility goes only as
far as human errors stay out of the picture. Therefore, the design layout of road networks and vehicular opera-
tions plays an essential role in guiding and informing road user behaviour.
In alignment with this, Education, Enforcement, Engineering and Emergency Care are crucial factors
in reducing the number of accidents and fatalities.
Education
A road safety awareness campaign utilises audio-visual (short films, ads, radio), print media, and non-profit
organisations. The Government activities form an essential contribution. Steps recommended for creating pub-
lic awareness regarding road safety often include education, training and publicity campaigns to influence the
attitudes and behaviours of all road users. Students and schoolchildren are also included in road safety education
programs. Additionally, publicity campaigns concerning road safety can help propagate good practices among
communities.
Enforcement
The causes of most crashes cannot be considered crimes except in the sense of breaking road rules and negligent
driving without due care and attention. Drink-driving, also considered a social behaviour issue, is reported more
than any other non-compliance issue. Even so, the approach for preventing road crashes and crime in particular
is similar to the approach for preventing situational crimes. The road rules are expected to be followed by
citizens if not adhering to them would result in unwanted outcomes, such as fines or revoked licences. The
theory is sometimes correct, but it is frequently observed that people stop being afraid of minor fines after they
get used to them. Therefore, disobeying road rules is perceived to be very risky and the likelihood of getting
caught and penalised is high. Additionally, penalties should be sufficiently severe to discourage disobedience.
It is important to enforce road rules that have been shown to increase the likelihood or severity of crashes in
order to maximise road safety benefits. An increase in road safety can be achieved by using artificial intelli-
gence-based policing.
As earlier mentioned, road safety is a concern for everyone, including the vulnerable. It is therefore
essential that road design guidelines aim to make roads and rules inclusive and provide adequate facilities that
cater to all needs. Footpaths, cycle lanes, crossing points, elderly and children zones and other traffic-calming
measures are critical to reducing RTIs.
Safer Vehicles: In India, vehicles vary based on type, size, engine, function, capacity, technology, etc. how-
ever, they all share the same ROW and often without bifurcated lanes and speed limits. Therefore, keeping in
mind the driver's safety is a must for vehicle designers and manufacturers. However, as mentioned earlier, this
is often not the case – either because the guidelines are vague or because there is no set penalty for failing to
meet the vehicle standards.
Although the Motor Vehicle Act has tried to specify safety standards, enforcement of these guidelines
becomes vital. It is proven that vehicle defects, fewer safety features, and lack of maintenance significantly
increase accident risks. Several UN regulations on vehicle safety would potentially save many lives if applied
to countries’ manufacturing and production standards.
Following are the four channels through which healthy individuals can contribute better to the economy and
growth of the country:
Labor Productivity
It is no rocket science that healthier individuals are likely to be more productive. At the same time, productivity
relies on multiple factors such as emotional and mental well-being as well as physical welfare. Several eco-
nomic theories correlate health and income. Individuals seek to compensate for lower earnings by working
overtime. While this can strain their productivity, a proper, just wage will add to their satisfaction level and
positively impact their productivity.
Labor Supply
In alignment with the previous point, poor health reduces work responsibilities and, thus, labourers in certain
age groups. The primary victims of RTIs are the individuals comprising of the young working population who
also have better energy and strength for multiple tasks. Thus, a decreased number of RTIs invariably means a
physically fit working population and, hence, an efficient labour force.
Conclusion
It is established that road traffic injuries and fatalities are preventable. We also know that a holistic approach
and teamwork between multiple stakeholders is a must to address road safety issues. We believe that govern-
ments should take the lead in bringing the multiple sectors, including transport, health, police, education, and
other local organisations, together for better management and implementation.
We must establish a clear national goal and meet the set targets will total dedication. Effective inter-
ventions include public awareness, safer road designs, vehicle features, inclusive transportation planning, en-
hanced post-crash response, and stringent law enforcement. The new Motor Vehicle Act and the National Road
Safety Strategy (currently being finalised) set a base for the standards. The state agencies must chip in with
further extensions of their roles and responsibilities.
Across multiple agencies, there is a lack of coordination, and the existing mechanisms are not appro-
priately addressing the underlying issues. Many guidelines, laws, amendments, court orders, and empowered
and non-empowered committees at the state and national levels have been developed to address road safety
issues in India. Road users can also be booked for traffic violations under a variety of laws that vary from state
to state.
The various stakeholders involved in the road safety ecosystem can reduce road accidents and deaths
if they work together. In order to reduce the severity of road accidents, a combined effort from different organ-
isations and individuals is needed. Each stakeholder/ department/organisation has to be cautious, spread the
importance of road safety in reducing accidents, and promote good driving behaviours. Combined efforts from
all stakeholders are likely to ensure a safe road environment for country citizens.
We need a lead agency that is accountable, reliable, and, more importantly, adequately equipped with
human and financial resources to manage the different aspects of road safety. Countries like Argentina, Aus-
tralia, Finland, Great Britain, New Zealand, and Sweden have already allocated funds to the lead agency for
road safety. These funds are strategically diverted from the vehicle insurance fees and fines.
The state funds the lead agency through a small portion of traffic fines and motor vehicle registration.
Some Indian states, including Bihar, Kerala, Maharashtra, Punjab, Odisha, Rajasthan, Uttarakhand, and Tamil
Nadu, have also set up similar funds. Local initiatives have been towards improved patrolling, R&D for road
safety, enhanced post-accident care, and improved road infrastructure. However, the level of success and con-
sistency is still not adequately recorded for proper analysis.
It is an excellent initiation for the central government to promote such initiatives and enable authorities
across the country to establish and manage road accidents. There is also a need to look into accident hot-spots,
analyse the causes and consequences, and set policies accordingly. India does not have a national database, and
as discussed earlier, road fatalities and injuries are highly under-recorded. It is challenging to address the issue
with utmost clarity in such scenarios. MoRTH in 2017 suggested a uniform traffic accident recording, and if
adopted correctly, Indian states can potentially develop targeted programs combining law enforcement, aware-
ness, trauma response and rules compliance.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank my advisor for the valuable insight provided to me on this topic.
Recommendations
[1] Establish a statistical connection between the direct cost incurred by health systems in India for
young deaths and permanent disability caused by RTIs.
[2] Recognise the proportion of the population pushed into poverty because of individual deaths from
road accidents.
[3] Compare productivity and human capital loss because of road crash injuries.
[4] Establish funds for driver training, testing road layouts and vehicle conditions, and judicial segrega-
tion.
[5] Enhance the medical-care and emergency response team by providing additional human and finan-
cial resources.
[6] Identify and address risk factors associated with age and disability to create inclusive roads.
[7] Invest equitably in infrastructure as per the needs of different road users.
[8] Demarcate and segregate road users in a hierarchical order and implement individual speed limits
relevant to each category.
[9] Include crash barriers and impact control under road design attributes.
[10] Invest in road safety R&D for identifying crash hot spots, causes, and related qualities.
[11] Establish a monitoring and evaluation wing for road safety as an umbrella agency under the State
government and delegate responsibilities to local authorities annually.
REFERENCES
1. Department for Transport, GOV.UK. (2021). Sharing our roads safely: report of qualitative and
quantitative findings. Department for Transport, GOV.UK. Retrieved from
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/sharing-our-roads-safely
2. Gururaj, G., & Gautham, M. S. (2017). Advancing Road Safety in India: Implementation is the key.
Bengaluru: NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH AND NEURO SCIENCES.
3. International Transport Forum (ITF). (2012). Pedestrian Safety, Urban Space and Health. OECD
Publishing. Retrieved from https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/transport/pedestrian-safety-urban-space-and-
health_9789282103654-en#page4
4. International Transport Forum. (2016). Zero Road Deaths and Serious Injuries: Leading a Paradigm
Shift to a Safe System. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/9789282108055-en
5. Lopez, H. (2008). The Social Discount Rate: Estimates for Nine Latin American Countries. The
World Bank. Retrieved from
https://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/135541468266716605/pdf/wps4639.pdf
6. Ministry of Road Transport and Highways. (2021). Road Safety. India. Retrieved from
https://morth.nic.in/road-safety
7. Mir, M. S., & Mir, F. (n.d.). Road Safety Analysis - A Case Study of National Highway 1-A in India.
8. Mohan, D., Tiwari, G., & Bhalla, K. (2020). Road Safety in India: Status Report 2020. Indian
Institute of Technology Delhi. Transportation Research and Injury Prevention Programme(TRIPP). Retrieved
from http://tripp.iitd.ac.in/assets/publication/Road_Safety_in_India2018.pdf
9. MOLUGARAM, P. K. (2017). Various Road Safety Aspects in Indian Metropolitan Cities: A case
study of Hyderabad. CODATU – UMI Conferences joint event. CODATU & UMI.
10. MoRTH. (2019). Road Accidents in India. New Delhi: Transport Research Wing, Ministry of Road
Transport and Highways, GoI.
11. OECD; International Transport Forum (ITF). (2013). Cycling, Health and Safety. OECD
Publishing/ITF. Retrieved from https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/transport/cycling-health-and-
safety_9789282105955-en#page3
12. Pal, R., Ghosh, A., Kumar, R., Galwankar, S., Paul, S. K., Pal, S., . . . Agrawal, A. (2019, March).
Public health crisis of road traffic accidents in India: Risk factor assessment and recommendations on
prevention on the behalf of the Academy of Family Physicians of India. Journal of family medicine and
primary care, 8(3), 775-783. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.4103%2Fjfmpc.jfmpc_214_18
13. PIARC, WORLD ROAD ASSOCIATION. (2021). THE ROAD SAFETY MANAGEMENT
SYSTEM. ROAD SAFETY MANUAL | A MANUAL FOR PRACTITIONERS AND DECISION MAKERS ON
IMPLEMENTING SAFE SYSTEM INFRASTRUCTURE! Retrieved 11 12, 2021, from
https://roadsafety.piarc.org/en/road-safety-management/safety-management-system
14. Singh, S. K. (2016). Road Traffic Accidents in India: Issues and Challenges. Transportation
Research Procedia. 25, pp. 4708-4719. Shanghai: ELSEVIER. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.484
15. SLoCaT. (2020). RESULTS FRAMEWORK ON SUSTAINABLE, LOW CARBON TRANSPORT.
SLoCaT Partnership. Retrieved from https://slocat.net/resultsframework/
16. The World Bank. (2003). Road Safety. at a glance. Washington, DC: World Bank.
17. The World Bank. (2021). Traffic Crash Injuries and Disabilities : The Burden on Indian Society.
Washington, DC: World Bank Group. Retrieved from
https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-
reports/documentdetail/761181612392067411/main-report
18. Toroyan, T., & Peden, M. (2007). Youth and Road Safety. Geneva: World Health Organization.
19. United Nations. (2015). The 17 Goals. Retrieved from Sustainable Development Goals:
https://sdgs.un.org/goals
20. WHO; FIA FOUNDATION; GLOBAL ROAD SAFETY PARTNERSHIP; THE WORLD BANK.
(2013). Pedestrian safety: a road safety manual for decision-makers and practitioners. Geneva: World Health
Organization.
21. World Bank. (2017). The High Toll of Traffic Injuries : Unacceptable and Preventable. Washington,
DC: The World Bank. doi:http://hdl.handle.net/10986/29129
22. World Health Organization. (2018). Global status report on road safety 2018. World Health
Organization.
23. World Health Organization. (2021, 06). Road traffic injuries. Retrieved from
https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/road-traffic-injuries
24. World Health Organization. (n.d.). Fact Sheet #1_Road Safety: Basic Facts. WHO. Retrieved from
https://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/publications/road_traffic/Road_safety_media_brief_full_doc
ument.pdf
25. World Health Organization. (n.d.). Fact Sheet #3_Road Safety: Key Risk Factors. WHO. Retrieved
12 2021, from
https://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/publications/road_traffic/3_Road_Safety_Key_Risk_Factors
.pdf
26. World Resource Institute. (n.d.). Cities Safer by Design: Guidance and Examples to Promote Traffic
Safety through Urban and Street Design. WRI Ross Center for Sustainable Cities, EMBARQ.