RFP M1-Chapter 13
RFP M1-Chapter 13
Chapter 13
Chapter Objectives
Chapter 13
Introduction
The need to plan one’s retirement is becoming more obvious as the years pass. While every person
is expected to die someday, there will be those who lived “too” long and in the process outlived their
ability to survive economically. Yes, these people are retired and can no longer utilize their ability
to generate an income for their own basic sustenance. The only way they can live on is to draw on
past savings, living off their relatives or children’s income or to rely on social welfare.
The concern of retirement for the aged has changed over the years. This change is the result of the
changes in several areas. For instance, in Asia, there is the culture of filial piety – of grown children
taking care of their aged parents. In the early days, it is usual to find parents toiling their life away
just to give their children a chance of a good education and a better tomorrow. In return, they expect
their grown-up children to take care of them when they grow old.
This culture is progressively under threat of extinction as the financial impact and demands of
modern society take their toll on the grown children’s lives. When the cost of living goes up, the
ability of the working population to care for those other than their immediate families will become
increasingly difficult.
In view of these transformations taking place, it is obviously wiser to plan for one’s destiny than to
rely on a cultural practice that has become unreliable. In any case, it is both good for the retiree and
his grown-up children if the retiree is financially independent.
This chapter explores some of the ways in which an individual can plan for his retirement. The
mechanism are outlined, so that the planner will have a good grasp of the concepts and processes
that he can use to help his clients plan their retirement.
The retirement risk is the counterpart of the risk of premature death. Both are real but only one
can happen in one’s lifetime. After retirement, a death can no longer be classified as premature.
The person has lived his full economical life. If the individual dies prematurely, he will have no
necessity for funds that are being reserved for retirement. On the other hand, if the individual lives
until retirement, say age 55/56, provisions made for premature death will not be used, but there is a
An for
need individual
funds towho retires
sustain can expect
the living to live
years after he for
hadanother 15 tothe
retired. With 20possibility
years. With increased
of either outcome
materializing, the individual has little choice but to make provisions for both – if he does
awareness of health concept and improvement to the health care system, people are generally not wish to
leave his financial future to the fickleness of fate.
living longer than those of the past generations. The life expectancy of a Malaysian male is
Anabout 70 while
individual whowomen are expect
retires can estimated to live
to live slightly 15
for another longer.
to 20 With
[Link] longevity
With increased arises of
awareness
health conceptof
the problem and improvement
retirement income. to the
Forhealth
incomecaretosystem, peopleitare
be produced, is generally
either manliving longer
at work or than
those of the past generations. The life expectancy of a Malaysian male is about 70 while women are
money at work. When a retired person ‘really’ retires, he is economically ‘dead’ – but yet is
estimated to live slightly longer. With increased longevity arises the problem of retirement income.
alive
For in person,
income to berequiring
produced, all itthe
is necessity
either man thatateveryone
work or else
moneyneeds. So a question
at work. When aarises
retiredas person
to
whereretires,
‘really’ he is going
he is to get the income
economically to sustain
‘dead’ theisbalance
– but yet alive inofperson,
his living years? all the necessity that
requiring
everyone else needs. So a question arises as to where he is going to get the income to sustain the
balance of his living years?
To plan one’s retirement is akin to planning against the risk of premature death. There is a process
of performing the task. The retirement planning process consists of essentially three broad steps.
These steps are outlined below:
• The first step is to assess the future income need of a person. How much will he need to
retire the way he wanted? If it is just to survive, the need will be smaller. If a more ambitious
retirement plan is in the mind of the person, then the funds to be created will be greater. This
requires forecasting the income needs that will exist after the person had retired in congruence
to the type of retirement he desires. As part of this step one has to identify the sources that will
be available to meet these needs.
• The second step involves the question of how to accumulate the funds defined in the first step.
This requires the designing of a plan that will meet the needs of the client and to implement the
plan successfully thereafter. The amount needed is the difference between the resources that
will be needed for the retirement and the resources, e.g. EPF, available at retirement.
• The final step is to ascertain the manner in which the accumulation will be consumed. How
should the retiree be paid? Is lump sum better or is it the annuity payment method? For the
method to be determined, the period of projected benefit payments and the provision that
should be made for the dependants must be known.
In essence, there are three broad sources of funding the retirement need of an individual. In
Malaysia, there is no social security like those found in some developed countries. The only ways to
fund the retirement is through EPF, private retirement schemes or through personal accumulation
and savings methods or a combination of these.
RFP Course - Module 1 Chapter 13: Retirement Planning Tools and Processes
Social Security
Private Retirement
Schemes
Personal Savings
and Investments
As in financial planning, retirement planning follows a planning process that is conceptually close
to the six-step personal financial planning process adopted by the Malaysian Financial Planning
Council (MFPC).
The discussion of the retirement issues, strategies and techniques to follow are structured mostly
around this six-step retirement planning process.
In addition, he should explain to the client their mutual responsibilities, and disclose his area of
competence, in particular his expertise in performing the retirement planning job. Usually, this is
already done when the financial practitioner begins the financial planning activity on the signing of
a letter of engagement. Where necessary, the financial practitioner should also declare which are
the planning areas in which he has no expertise. In such cases, the financial practitioner should
let the client know that other professional help is needed to solve some of the problems. This is to
prevent the client from having unnecessary wrong expectations.
The key first step is to establish his retirement goals and objectives. In the MFPC model of the
six step financial planning process setting the goals and objectives should be kept foremost in
the planner’s mind. Financial planners firmly believe in the power of goals and the importance of
purpose and intentions. Achieving goals is what it is all about.
Once the overall health position of the client is determined, the financial practitioner can proceed
with finding out the retirement needs of the client. The retirement gap is the deficiency amount
that has to be determined and filled in order for the client to have adequate funds to meet his
retirement needs.
These are the 6 stages to help determine the funds required to cover the deficiency of the
client at retirement:
The replacement ratio method operates based on the assumption that changes in the cost
of living will be roughly echoed by changes in the individual’s income over the years of his
working life. In addition, this method assumes that the post-retirement income needs of the
client can be estimated from the individual’s pre-retirement income.
The method also assumes that the standard of living enjoyed by the client during the pre-
retirement years will be the determining factor for the standard of living during the retirement
phase. In applying this method of estimating the retirement income need, the closer the
individual is to the age of retirement, the easier it will be to determine the desired sum. If a
younger person is involved, there is a need to estimate a figure that will be close to his salary at
retirement – often called the last drawn salary. The last drawn salary is obtained by projecting
the growth of his salary till the retirement age is reached at an assumed rate. Often, the inflation
rate is used.
Again, it is easier to determine the amount needed if the retiree is closer to retirement
age. Unlike the replacement ratio method, the expense method requires that the
post-retirement inflation be taken into consideration. Time-value techniques are
used in computing the retirement needs
Stage 2: Determining the “lump sum required” at retirement to fund income need (with
or without residue for distribution) during the retirement period.
Essentially, there are two techniques that can be used to compute the lump sum retirement
needs of the retiree. One is the Capital Liquidation Method [or Asset Utilization Approach] and
the other is the Capital Conservation Method [or the Asset Preservation Approach].
Basically, in the capital liquidation method [or asset utilization approach], the assets are
progressively liquidated to meet the needs of the retiree over the period of his retirement.
There is no residual amount expected at the end of the retirement period for the purpose of
distribution to heirs.
When using this method, the accuracy of determining the number of years in the retirement
period is very important. If not, the retiree faces the risk of running out of funds to support the
balance of his living years should he live longer than assumed. It would be prudent, therefore,
to project the numbers of retirement years more generously so that this risk is reduced.
Generally, the amount needed to fund the retiree is lesser, if this method is chosen over the
Capital Conservation Method. However, if the projected retirement years get longer, the amount
gets closer.
Using the capital conservation method [or the asset preservation approach] requires the
retiree to have at retirement an amount that is large enough to generate a stream of income
sufficient to sustain the chosen lifestyle and still leave behind a “targeted amount” (AC) of
money for distribution at the end of the retirement period.
Needless to say, the twin function of having to generate a sufficient income stream to finance
retirement needs plus a lump sum preserved for future distribution to heirs will require the
accumulation of a larger fund at retirement. Unless, the individual is wealthy enough, the capital
conservation method is not viable.
Stage 3: Determining the current and future resources destined for retirement purpose.
This stage involves identifying the current available assets and cash savings/regular investment
plans, which are labeled for retirement and catalogued in a list with their values stated. To save
time, this activity can be done on a worksheet. It is important for the financial practitioner to
segregate the income-producing assets from those that are non-income producing.
Non-income producing assets or personal-use assets may include assets such as his retirement
home or a piece of unproductive land. Unless, the home is targeted for downsizing or to be sold
at retirement to spin out additional retirement resources, they are excluded in the computation
of available resources at retirement.
In addition, those assets or income stream that will be depleted or terminated before the client
retires should be noted and omitted in the final computation of the available assets for retirement
purpose. The construction of a balance sheet and income statement would be useful to help in
the identification
Stage 4: Converting the value of the current resources to their value at retirement.
The current resources meant for retirement, i.e. the current available assets and cash savings/
regular investment plans, are converted to “current resources at retirement” and “accumulated
savings/regular investment plan value at retirement” using time value of money (TVM)
techniques. The figures are computed on a worksheet. The total amount derived is the “funds
or resources available” at retirement. Sometimes this is called the retirement-resources status
(RRS) of the client.
Stage 5: Finding the lump sum retirement gap or the deficit/surplus amount
Once the retirement-resources status (RRS) is determined, it is time to calculate the lump
sum “retirement gap” or RG, which is the fund deficiency at retirement. The “funds needed” at
retirement less the “funds available” at retirement (Step 1 minus Step 4) will identify the lump
sum retirement gap. The design and recommendations made in the retirement funding plan are
made with the lump sum retirement gap in mind.
Stage 6: Determining the funding needs during the pre-retirement period to meet the
lump sum needs at retirement.
Once the deficiencies are identified and the lump sum retirement gap is determined, the
financial practitioner can proceed to choose a funding method to meet the deficiency. There
are three ways of doing the job.
The first is through the annual funding need (AFN) approach to meet the deficit and fill the
gap. In this approach, the annual funding needed is determined using a formula.
The second way is to use a lump sum funding need (LSFD) approach. The lump sum
approach is seldom used because the client’s total resources at retirement are already shown
when his retirement resources status is computed. In any case, the client still needs to know
what the lump sum amount is needed to fill the deficiency at retirement because he may get a
windfall along the way or somehow is able to get the needed amount.
And finally, the third way is to use a combination funding approach, which is a combination
of the above two approaches. The client will determine what lump sum amount he currently has
that is allotted for his retirement. For instance, he may strike a lottery a couple of months later
and wish to allot some of the winnings for retirement purpose.
The future value of the new lump sum available is computed to determine the new retirement
gap, which is then funded through the annual funding method.
If we refer to the analysis done in step 3, there are basically five broad areas to consider when
building a retirement plan. (For our purpose, only the financial aspects are considered). These
five areas would cover most of the zones required to ink a clear roadmap leading to a satisfactory
retirement for the client.
- What does the client want at retirement? The first would be to identify the type of lifestyle
the client would want to be in when he finally retires. No matter what lifestyle is chosen, the
basic requirements are to have a roof over the head, sufficient income to live out the retirement
years and have money to pay for unexpected expenses. These three needs are basal to all
retirement plans.
- What are the client’s financial retirement resources? The second is to determine the client’s
current financial standing in relation to his retirement goal. The retirement-resources status
discussed earlier should reveal to the financial practitioner the client’s situation at retirement.
The status should be stated clearly in the plan.
- What is the income needed to sufficiently fund the lifestyle chosen? The third area is
to determine the sort of income needed to sustain the client’s chosen lifestyle. The quality
of the lifestyle will depend on the income available when the client retires. To achieve this
objective, the financial practitioner must, as accurately as possible, compute the amount of
income required to meet the objective. Then amount is then capitalized using TVM techniques
(refer to step three of the retirement planning process).
- What is the additional lump sum amount needed (fund deficiency) to fill the client’s
retirement needs? The fourth area is to find the lump sum retirement gap. The projected lump
sum needed at retirement less the projected retirement resources will give at the lump sum
retirement gap.
- What must the client do from now on in order to meet his retirement funding shortfall? And
finally, the fifth or last area of consideration, a retirement funding blueprint must be developed
to ensure the retirement goal can be achieved. The blueprint will outline the investment options
and strategies that have to be adopted for the client to meet his retirement goals.
The financial practitioner should be reminded that the laws and regulations governing plan
qualification also help to determine the design of the retirement plan. Tax laws are in particular
an important determinant. Other factors being equal, those investment vehicles in the plan that
are chosen based on available tax incentives will produce a greater yield than those that do not.
For instance, life insurance products qualify for certain amount of tax deduction according to the
Income Tax Act.
with the help of other professionals if the financial practitioner himself is not sufficiently competent
in handling the function.
The monitoring function may involve rebalancing the assets in the portfolio. If for instance, the
value of the client’s share portfolio surges from says the allocated 25% to 50% due to growth, this
indicates that the portfolio should be rebalanced to the chosen allocation of 25%. Of course, if the
client circumstances have changed and the client is comfortable with the increased risk, then no
adjustment is needed.
Review of Investments
For the following reasons, it is imperative that the financial practitioner reviews the investment
performance of the client’s retirement portfolio periodically:
• Checking the performance of the investments in the portfolio and reporting them to the client.
• Checking the current relevancy of the investment in meeting the retirement goals
• The manifestation of new investment instruments that may be better than the current ones for
meeting the objectives of the client
There are no hard and fast rules regarding the time between reviews and events that trigger a
review from the time of the plan implementation, but the following three types of reviews are
commonly practiced.
• Initial Review: The first review usually takes place one month after the strategies outlined in the
plan are implemented. This review is to make certain that the performance of the investment
and other non-investment activities are in accordance with expectations and are in alignment
with the goals and objectives that have been set. If the results show that these activities are
not performing as planned or are out of alignment, they should trigger actions to carry out
adjustments, either to the goals and objectives or to the activities or both.
• Yearly Reviews: The first annual review is carried out twelve months after the plan is
implemented, and thereafter, annually. Again, the review is to ensure that the performance of
the investment and other non-investment activities are in accordance with expectations and
are in alignment with the goals and objectives that have been set.
• Impromptu Reviews: These are reviews that are triggered by unexpected events or where the
client requisitions for one because he has a change of plan with regard to issues concerning
his retirement or estate. For instance, a financial crisis that affects investment returns severely
should immediately trigger an impromptu review of the plan.
A recent survey by MDRT of 1,000 Americans shows the workers of today are accepting more
personal responsibility for their retirement than those currently retired. In fact, 73 percent of future
retirees identify themselves as most responsible for their retirement as compared to only 58 percent
of current retirees. This shift can be linked to a growing concern among workers that outside parties,
such as employers and the government, will not be able to provide the level of income necessary
for a comfortable retirement. In fact, 77 percent of retirees say they are confident in the Social
Security program, while only 43 percent of future retirees express such confidence.
The survey also found that more than two-thirds of retirees wish they had done something differently
in their retirement planning. Fifty percent of retired Americans say they wish they had started
planning earlier; 47 percent of Americans wish they had more saved; and 25 percent say they
should have gotten more guidance.
1. Tendency to overspend
Many working adults tend to spend the full after-tax income to support their current standard of
living. This has resulted with nothing left for saving towards retirement. It is for this reason that
all clients should be taught at a young age to follow a budget that assists them to live within
their means and also provide for their retirement savings.
Planners should emphasize that a spending ratio of not more than 90/10 is generally desired.
Under the 90/10 ratio, 90 percent of the clients’ after-tax income is used to maintain the current
standard of living and the 10 percent is directed to other long-term financial objectives such as
the clients’ children education and their own retirement.
Furthermore, planners should recommend that when income increases, the percentage spent
on current standard of living should decline.
Unexpected expenses like cost of major repair to the house and expenses due to inadequate
insurance and unexpected reduction in income either through pay reduction or unemployment
do occur from time to time.
The client should set up an emergency fund consisting of 3 to 6 months’ of his/her income. In
addition, the planners should conduct a thorough review of their clients’ insurance needs to
ensure they are covered adequately.
Down payment for a residential home and education of children may consume whatever
long-term savings one has. Usually these objectives are more immediate than the retirement
savings. Although these objectives are important, planners have to remind the client to set up
a dedicated fund specially for retirement purpose.
4. Divorce
Divorce often leaves one or both parties with little or no accumulation of private retirement
income. The problem is compounded by additional expenses incurred when one has to live on
his or her own.
An employee can be rewarded for his services in many ways. The cash-based remuneration like
salaries, wages, commissions and bonuses paid to employees (including owner-employees) are
probably the most significant portions of the income package paid as reward for their contribution to
the business. As long as these payments are realistic, reasonable and within the confines allowed
by the tax code, they rank for full deduction as ordinary and business operational expenses. There
are also cases where the owner-employee and their relatives who receive reward far in excess of
the type and degree of services rendered to the business. In such situations, the DGIR has the
power to disregard such payments as tax deductible or to bring them in conformity with commercial
practices.
Generally, all payments made in respect to services rendered by the employees and which are in
accordance with the service agreement are allowed as tax deductible expenses to the business.
However, there are some types of payments made to or on behalf of the employees which are not
allowable or can become a contentious issue with the IRB. Hence, in planning the compensation
structure for the business owner, the planner must be familiar with the type of payments that may
give problems. The following are some of such payments:
• Non-contractual rewards like gratuities or voluntary rewards for services rendered may be
disallowed unless the IRB is satisfied that it is the enterprise general policy to make such
payments and the amount of such payments are reasonable by commercial standards. The
situation is the same where ex-gratia payments are made to beneficiaries of a deceased
employee.
• Payments given to a terminated employee to prevent him from exercising a similar employment
elsewhere are in the nature of goodwill and are not tax allowable deductions. The amount
received by the employee is likewise not taxable in his hands. This would be the treatment is
the payments are considered capital. However, compensation for loss of income is taxable as
gross employment income under section 13 (1) (e). However, an exemption of RM 6,000 for
each completed year of service is provided under Schedule 6 of the Income Tax Act 1967.
• Leave passages to employees are not allowable for tax deduction by the employer.
• Insurance premiums or other contributions made for the benefit of an employee to an unapproved
provident fund or scheme by the employer do not qualify for tax deduction.
• When the business is wound up, payments paid to employees to facilitate the winding up
process are not deductible expenses as they are not considered as being incurred in the
production of income for the enterprise.
There are various factors to consider when choosing an employee benefit scheme. Some of the
more important ones are stated below:
• Tax deductibility of contributions: Not all schemes enjoy tax deduction, and this affects the yield
to the fund and final outlays by the contributors.
• Tax liability in respect of earnings of the scheme’s fund: Only approved schemes enjoy tax
exemption of the income earned by the fund.
• Pension or lump sum and the tax implications: Pension payments refer to a regular stream of
payment, usually on a monthly basis while lump sum is a one time full payment of the benefit
amount.
• Vehicle to use for the accumulation: This refers to the method chosen to accumulate the fund.
An example would be using life insurance or unit trust scheme.
• Employee’s tax liability on receipt of the benefit payments: The type of funds and the timing of
payment affect the tax liability on the amount received by the beneficiary.
The tax code under Sec. 150 provides that the DGIR can approve under certain conditions a
pension or provident fund for income tax purposes. Such funds known as “approved funds”, allow
the contributors to enjoy preferential tax treatment over others who contribute to the “unapproved”
version of such funds. In fact, those plans that do not receive the blessings of the DGIR as an
approved fund will be termed as an “unapproved fund”.
Currently, the tax code (Sec. 34(4), ITA) allows for deduction on the contributions made by the
employer to an approved fund up to 19% of the remuneration of the participating employee. Since
12% of the 19% of employees’ remuneration is contributed to EPF as a compulsory requirement,
only a maximum of 7% is left and can be applied to another approved fund set up by the employer.
Employment remuneration that is subject to deduction for contribution purpose would include
monthly wages, overtime pay, fixed allowances, commissions and contractual bonus, but exclude
discretionary ex-gratia payments and director fees.
For determining the amount deductible as an expense to the employer, the deduction will be
restricted to the lesser of:
Approved Plans
The main advantages accorded to approved plans are the various tax benefits on the contributions
made to the fund and on the withdrawn amount. These benefits are discussed below.
One of the reasons for setting up an approved plan is in the area of accumulation. The tax benefits
for approved plans can be substantial for the contributors and the recipient of the plan. These
benefits may be summed up as follows:
• Contributions made by the employer are tax allowable, subject to the limit set by the tax code,
which is adjusted from time to time.
• Contributions made by the employee are taxable but the resident individual will get a personal
relief of RM 6,000 for the combined contributions towards EPF and a life insurance policy on
his life or his wife’s life or both their lives.
• Withdrawals from the funds by the employee are not considered taxable income in their
hands.
• Under the same circumstances, the accumulation of the fund is faster compared to unapproved
schemes because the income of the plan or fund is tax-free. In most countries this is all the
benefit they get. The approved funds in Malaysia can accumulate income, tax free and further
distribute them tax free.
In Malaysia, all employers are legally compelled to contribute to an approved fund called the
Employees’ Provident Fund (EPF) for their employees’ benefit. EPF may thus be considered a
compulsory retirement scheme. As the contribution is defined as a percentage of earnings or a
fixed sum, the EPF is a defined contribution scheme. Because of this ruling that compels employers
to contribute to the scheme for all its employees, Malaysian employees with no retirement program
are virtually non-existent.
The EPF is currently the largest of the retirement funds in the country and is probably the most
important retirement fund for most of the employees living here. The operation of the Employees’
Provident Fund is controlled by the Employees’ Provident Fund Act 1991, which became effective
on 1 June 1991. This Act superseded the Employees’ Provident Fund Act 1951, which has become
outdated over the years.
Basically, the EPF is a Statutory Board and is empowered to appoint a Manager, a Deputy Manager,
a Secretary and an Accountant and such officers as essential to administer the legislation passed by
Parliament. The Board makes decisions on the investment policy of the fund and makes adjustment
from time to time as needed.
The term “employer” is defined in Sec 2 of the EPF Act to include the following individuals:
• Any body or persons, whether or not statutory or incorporated; Federal and State Government
Statutory Boards.
The EPF Act specifies certain responsibilities and rights of the employer as a contributor and as an
agent of the employee, which must be adhered to strictly. Employers, who flaunt the rules, may be
prosecuted by fines and imprisonment. The rules set out by the EPF Act are as follows:
• Every corporation incorporated or registered under the Companies Act 1965 must notify the
Board within 30 days of its incorporation or registration.
• Every employer must prepare and furnish a statement of wages to each employee.
• Although it is not necessary to inform the EPF Board when a new employee is engaged,
the employer is required to obtain an EPF certificate of membership for the employee and
completed it in all respects (Form EPF 5).
• The employer is not required to make any contributions in respect of a new employee unless
the latter has completed one calendar month of service.
• The employer shall notify the Board of any change of his address within seven days of the
change.
• The employer must inform the Board within fourteen days when he ceases to become liable to
contribute.
• The employer is liable to pay the contributions payable both by himself and by the employee.
• The employer is entitled to recover from the employee the amount of the monthly contributions
paid on the latter’s behalf to the EPF.
• With effect from 1 January 1993, the rate of contribution by employers to the EPF is 12% of its
employees’ remuneration. (Note: Under the Income Tax Act 1967 employer can contribute up
to 19% of the amount and enjoy tax deduction for the contributed amount.)
The employee as defined in the Act refers to any person who is employed under a contract of
service or apprenticeship. This definition would practically cover every employee in the country.
The service contract between the employer and employees need not necessarily be in writing.
Unless specifically exempt, every employee is liable to pay contributions unless he has withdrawn
his credit from the fund. From 1 January 1996, the rate of contribution by employees to the EPF is
11%.
In the case of sole proprietors and partners in a registered partnership, they are not compelled to
contribute to EPF. This rule applies to all self–employed persons, including pensioners. For self-
employed person or a pensioner, they may choose to contribute a single monthly amount of up
to RM 500/- to the EPF. As for directors of companies, irrespective of whether they are owners or
otherwise, they are liable for contribution to the Fund if they receive remuneration under a contract
of service. They are not liable on directors’ fees as these payments are specifically excluded from
the definition of wages in the EPF Act.
To encourage more people to save for their retirement, the EPF participation program is widened to
allow for more people to be eligible to contribute to the Fund. With effect from 1 August 1995, any
person who is not an employer or an employee within the meaning of the Employees’ Provident Fund
Act 1991 may elect to contribute voluntarily to the fund at the prescribed rate if he so chooses.
Several key changes have been introduced into EPF. They are as follows:
D. Administrative streamline:
- Death benefit claim
- Incapacitation benefit claim
- Submission of forged documents for withdrawal by members
- Dispute on the authenticity of withdrawal amount
- Dispute on the authenticity of withdrawal
G. Contribution:
- Extension of liability to contribute from age 55 up to age 75 years
- Two Tier contribution rates
- Dividend payment up to age 75 years
- Savings not withdrawn at age 80 years to be transferred to the
Registrar of Unclaimed Monies.
Current situation
Account 1: Contains 60% of all contributions. From this account you can draw the full amount
upon reaching age 55. You can also use the contributions in this account to make investments in
approved list of fund managers.
Account 2: This account holds 30% of the contributions. From this account you can withdraw
money for housing, education and for full withdrawal at age 50.
Account 3: This account holds 10% of the contributions. From this account you can withdraw for
critical illness.
New Structure
(w.e.f. 1 January 2007)
Account 1 Account 2
(70%) (30%)
• Age 50
• Critical illness
• New contributions received after 1.1.2007 will be apportioned 70% into Account 1 and 30%
into Account 2
To encourage members after 55 years to withdraw their savings periodically over a longer
period.
• Members may choose any one or more of the payment options stated above).
To encourage members’ with excess savings to invest part of their savings on their own.
A member whose savings has exceeded RM1million can withdraw the amount in excess of
RM1 million at any time subject to a minimum withdrawal amount of RM 100,000.00 every three
(3) months.
A member may withdraw their Account 2 savings for this purpose whereupon payment will be
credited directly into member’s bank account.
Note:
i. Yearly withdrawal to reduce housing loan whereupon payment is made to members’ housing
loan account.
i. Spouses who are not joint – owners of property allowed to withdraw their savings from Account
2 to help reduce their spouses’ housing loan.
To allow members at various age levels to invest part of their savings to enhance their retirement
savings.
Members may invest 20% of savings in excess of the ‘basic saving’ in Account 1 in approved
investments through approved institutions.
Investments in approved institutions shall be deemed withdrawn when a member attains age
55 years, even if he/she has not made full withdrawal. (1September 2007).
Savings transferred for investments shall be returned to the EPF upon liquidation of investment if
members had not withdrawn at age 55 years.
“BASIC SAVING”
Objective:
This amount would give a member a payment of RM500 a month for a period of 20 years (55
- 75 years).
25 9,000
30 18,000
35 29,000
40 44,000
45 64,000
50 90,000
55 120,000
A member needs to have the required amount of savings at the predetermined age levels. Amount in
excess of the ‘basic sum’ can be invested in approved investments through approved Institutions
CONTRIBUTION
Objective:
Upon full withdrawal, employees cease liability to contribute but may elect to contribute.
Objective:
To encourage continued employment for employees after age 55 and avoid burdening
employers and employees with high contribution rate.
50% of statutory rate of contribution of employees below age 55 ( 5.5 % by employees and 6%
by employers)
Note:
Objective:
Savings not withdrawn after age 75 years shall be transferred to the Registrar of Unclaimed
Monies after 5 years, that is, at age 80.
Objective:
A member can withdraw savings from Account 2 to purchase a Critical Illness Insurance
Policy for himself and immediate family members through the Critical Illness Insurance Policy
Withdrawals scheme.
Objective:
Not applicable to Muslim members following a Fatwa (Islamic religious decree) that the EPF savings
is not a matrimonial property.
Objective:
- Will be made mandatory in phases starting with employers with 1000 and more
employees.
- In the meanwhile, the other employers may continue to make payments using the usual
mode. However, they are encouraged to switch to the electronic payment mode.
- Any employer who has been required mandatory to use the electronic mode but fail to do
so shall be fined. The amount is to be determined.
Objective:
To ensure that members have at least RM 120,000 at age 55 to sustain through their
retirement.
- Members who have the basic savings in Account 1 may withdraw their savings in Account
2.
- Members who do not have the basic savings in Account 1 must meet the
requirement before they can be allowed to withdraw savings in Account 2.
[Will be in force on 1 January 2013]
Meaning of Wages
The meaning of wages is stated in Sec 2 of the Employees’ Provident Fund Act 1991 (as amended
by the Employees’ Provident Fund (Amendment) Act 1995). It defines wages as “all remuneration
in money, due to an employee under his contract of service or apprenticeship whether agreed
to be paid monthly, weekly, daily or otherwise and includes any bonus or allowance payable by
the employer to the employee whether such bonus or allowance is payable under his contract of
service, apprenticeship or otherwise”. The Section excludes service charge; overtime payment;
gratuity; retirement benefit; retrenchment, lay-off or termination benefits; any traveling allowance of
the value of any traveling concession; or any other remuneration or payment as may be exempted
by the Minister. The above definition is fairly broad and covers all cash rewards that flow from an
employment, such as commissions, bonuses and all types of allowances.
On 1st July 2000, further changes were made to the EPF. An EPF annuity scheme was introduced
so that those who participated could enjoy a lifetime income instead of taking a lump sum on their
retirement. However, due to some “opposition” from certain parties, this scheme was put on hold in
2001 as far as new applications were concerned. With rapid changes coming to the administration
of the Fund, it is the duty of the planner to update himself regularly on changes made. This will
enable him to give proper advice to the business owner-client he is planning for.
There are multitudinous types of benefit schemes available here and more may be evolved in the
future to meet changing needs of the populace. For our purpose, we shall examine here some of
the common ones.
Pension Schemes
Essentially, a pension is a recurrent payment, voluntary or contractual, made to an individual who
no longer holds office or has retired from employment. The receiver of the pension payment could
be the retiree, his wife or child or to any other relative or dependant of the pensioner. The stream of
payments could be made by the employer or by the successor of the employer, or by arrangement
by an insurance company or by the trustee of a provident fund. Pensions are also sometimes paid
by the government to retired civil servants.
Pension schemes may be differentiated by the concept behind the method used to provide a
retirement benefit. There are basically two concepts of pension schemes, i.e. defined-contribution
and defined-benefit schemes.
In the case of a defined-contribution scheme, retirement pensions are obtained through the
contributions to the fund by both the employer and employee. Usually an account similar to
a bank account is contrived to accumulate money for the pension scheme. This method of
accumulation for the pension scheme is sometimes called “money-purchase pension scheme”
• The contribution to the fund is defined as either a percentage of salary or based on a fixed
sum. As the contributions and the earnings for the fund fluctuates from inception to the
time where the pension is paid, the benefits cannot be pre-determined.
• Often, the contribution to the fund is participated by both the employee and the employer.
Each will contribute a pre-determined portion.
• The risk of pre-retirement inflation, investment performance of the funds, and the adequacy
of the income from the fund at retirement is wholly borne by the employee.
• Since the service of an actuary is not needed, this method of accumulation is more cost
effective for the employer.
• If allowed by the service agreement or by law, the fund is more easily portable when
employee changes job. Portable means the employee can continue with the scheme with
the new employer when he switches jobs.
As for a defined-benefit pension scheme, the key feature is that the pension benefit of the scheme
is pre-determined on the inception, taking into consideration the post-retirement standard of
living of the potential retiree. For this reason, this type of pension scheme is considered more
desirable for the employees. But from the employer’s standpoint, this method of accumulation
is regarded as administratively cumbersome, complex, technical and riskier.
This type of scheme also has some common attributes which are stated below:
• For this type of pension scheme, the employer has more responsibilities. The business
must consider the pre-retirement inflationary trend and the income adequacy of the
pension paid to the employees on their retirement when designing and administering the
scheme.
• Because the benefit has been pre-determined, the employer assumes the investment
risk of making sure the fund is at all times adequate to meet the payment responsibility to
employees on their retirement.
• An important plus point of this scheme is that it allows the employer to take into consideration
the past service contributions of the employees in terms of time and productivity.
Advance funding requires the putting aside of funds for the payment of pension benefits in
advance of its due date. In the case of defined-benefit pension schemes, the cost of providing the
benefits must be estimated years in advance. To determine the contribution amount each year
and estimate the pension costs, the actuary will take the following factors into consideration:
ii. The projected mortality of the participants of the pension scheme: The lower the mortality,
the more will be the payments made to them;
v. The forecasted number of participants who will die or have left before receiving the pension
benefits;
The final pension cost of a defined-benefit pension scheme is often assumed to be equal to
the benefits paid out, plus the cost of administration, less the earnings (including the capital
gains and losses) of the fund for the purpose. This, however, does not mirror the real cost to
the employer.
The real cost can only be estimated by taking into consideration factors like decreased employee
turnover, retirement of incompetent employees, enhanced morale, and other difficulties to
quantify benefits. Since it is impractical to evaluate these factors, the net financial allocation
ordinarily is accepted to portray the cost of the scheme.
For insured plans, the life insurers have several suitable products to offer. Since the main
characteristic of a pension scheme is to provide a regular monthly income to the retiree, an annuity
plan can be purchased for the purpose. An endowment or pure endowment or an investment-
linked plan can provide a lump sum at retirement of the participant and can be used to purchase
an annuity. In Malaysia, annuity payments from life insurers and takaful companies are exempted
from tax in the hands of the recipient.
For such schemes, the employer is considered a self-insurer. The business assumes all the risks
– investment, mortality, and the expense – under a trusted defined-benefit pension scheme. This
type of scheme is not recommended for small businesses where they do not have the advantages
of the large companies to self-insure the pension risk, unless the investment of funds is given to
insurance companies who can guarantee a certain minimum rate of return. Even though, involving
the insurers do not make the contract an insured pension scheme, these arrangements have proven
to be an important source of business for the insurance companies in some overseas countries like
the United States.
Another way to design pension program is to use two or more types of contracts combined to provide
the benefit payments to the employees. All these variations are termed split-funding contracts. This
type of funding is practiced in some more advanced countries, where a bank and/or a life insurer
are used. If a bank is used to hold and invest a part of the fund in the active life fund, the money in
the fund may be moved from the bank to the life insurance company to provide guaranteed annuity
income as the employee retires. If the life insurance company does not hold any of the moneys
prior to retirement and receives money only as the employee retires, the arrangement is known
as maturity funding contract. The complexity of such arrangement requires expertise of a high
order that is quite scarce here. As such, this type of arrangement is still uncommonly found in local
companies.
A pension is regarded as an income, and unless specifically exempted by law, is a taxable item to
the recipient. Under Sec. 16, the tax code provides that any pension paid voluntarily to any person
(or his beneficiary) who has permanently ceased to exercise an employment shall be considered
to be gross income from that source liable to tax. A voluntary pension will be considered to have a
Malaysian source if the person responsible for payment of the payment of the pension is resident in
Malaysia for the basis period in which the pension is paid. Under Section 17, the ITA also provides
that pensions paid out of schemes or funds which are administered in Malaysia, have a Malaysian
source.
The provision for exemption of pension is stipulated in the tax code via Para. 30, Part I, Schedule
6. It states that a resident of Malaysia, who has reached the age of 55 or the compulsory retirement
age or has retired due to ill-health, may have his pension received as a result of rendering services
in a former employment in Malaysia exempted from tax. This section also provides that pension
paid out of an approved scheme is exempted from tax.
If the pension is commuted and is paid out as a lump sum, the payment would be considered a
capital item and is not taxable to the recipient. Although specific exemption is not provided in the
tax code, it is weighed that a good defense can be made against any action by the IRB to tax such
proceeds, as there is a large body of case law that can provide support for the recipient.
Share options are often offered to employee to purchase the company’s shares at a certain price
that has to be exercised before a particular future date. Such incentive schemes for employees are
a recent development in Malaysia. If the take up price is lower than the market price, the holder of
the shares will make a profit out of selling the shares. The tax code does not specifically provide for
the taxing of share options. However, it is the routine of the IRB to attribute a benefit on the option
right and levy tax on it. In attributing the benefit, the IRB has adopted the practice of assessing the
benefit that arises to employees at the time the option is granted and not at the time the option is
activated. Once the option has been exercised and the shares are in the hands of the employee,
they will constitute a capital asset. When these shares are disposed of in the future, any profit and
loss arising from such dealings will be on capital account.
Sometimes an employer may allot to its employees some shares on the company to compensate
them and to win their devotion. This form of compensation does not receive favorable tax treatment
as they are a taxable benefit in the hands of the employees while they are not a tax-deductible
expenditure to the company. For share allotment, the IRB considers that the company has not
incurred any expenditure as it has only given out “paper shares” to employees.
Essentially, gratuities are payments and reward for services rendered to employees or owner-
employees when they retire from active work in the company or to their heirs on their death,
A simpler lifestyle will require less retirement income. Furthermore, a retiree has other competing
needs like medical needs and a non-working spouse to support. Cutting on unnecessary
expenses will go a long way to preserve the retirement resources for more pressing needs.
If a client is willing to sell his or her home and relocate to a smaller and less expensive home,
the extra money can be an additional source of retirement income. From the financial viewpoint,
a home is usually the biggest asset that most retirees possess. They should capitalize on this
asset to free up additional fund to supplement their retirement income.
3. Delay retirement
Delayed retirement will enable the clients to have more time for accumulation towards retirement
savings. The clients will also require lesser retirement income to live on in later years.
Many retirees who engage in postretirement employment find that the extra money earned not
only a good supplement to their retirement income but also help them to adapt psychologically
to the changes retirement brings. This is all the more for clients whose self-esteem and sense
of self-worth were tied to their previous career.
Negotiating with the employers to contribute part of the employees’ salary increment up to 19%
of the employers’ portion to EPF instead of receiving all increment as salary. This will not only
reduce the taxation of the employees’ income but also have the compounding effect on the
EPF accumulation since the employers’ portion is tax exempted.
The alternate way is to through deferred compensation but it must be funded and creditors
proof.
APPENDIX 1
1. What are you MOST concerned about in regards to the financial aspects of your retirement?
Any 87 77 90
Other 2 1 2
None 11 22 8
Don’t know 2 1 1
Any 63 50 66
Other 18 31 16
None 35 48 32
Don’t know 2 1 2
3. Who do you believe is MOST responsible for providing for you during retirement?
Yourself 70 58 73
The government 10 15 9
Your employer 8 9 7
4. Assuming you have done some type of retirement preparation, what things, if anything, do you
wish you had done differently?
Retired
Other 2
Don’t know/None 4
5. I am going to name several retirement options and programs. For each one, please tell me
how confident you are that it will provide for you during retirement. Are you “very confident,”
“somewhat confident,” “not too confident,” or “not at all confident?”
a) Social security
Total Non-
Retired
Public Retired
Very confident 15% 38% 9%
Somewhat confident 35 39 34
Don’t know 1 2 1
b) 401K
Total Non-
Retired
Public Retired
Very confident 24% 15% 26%
Somewhat confident 35 16 40
Don’t know 2 3 1
c) IRA
Total Non-
Retired
Public Retired
Very confident 18% 21% 17%
Somewhat confident 38 25 42
Don’t know 3 3 3
Total Non-
Retired
Public Retired
Very confident 16% 19% 15%
Somewhat confident 41 33 43
Don’t know 2 3 1
Total Non-
Retired
Public Retired
Very confident 23% 33% 20%
Somewhat confident 34 21 37
Don’t know 2 3 1
f) Personal savings
Total Non-
Retired
Public Retired
Very confident 37% 34% 37%
Somewhat confident 41 38 42
Don’t know 2 5 1
g) Annuities
Total Non-
Retired
Public Retired
Very confident 10% 18% 8%
Somewhat confident 33 24 36
Don’t know 3 3 3
Self Assessment
1. In retirement planning, a financial planner must have concern for those who lived “too long”
and in the process outlived their ability to
a. survive socially
b. survive economically
c. survive spiritually
d. survive physically
2. With increased awareness of health concept and improvement to the health care system,
people are generally
a. personal accumulation
b. EPF
d. contribution by children
In constructing a retirement plan, the three steps in the correct order are:
a. i, ii and iii
b. iii, i and ii
c. iii, ii and i
6. In assessing the retirement income needs, the method that considers 70% of the last drawn
salary as income needs is the
a. expense method
d. reduction method
7. In planning the retirement apportionment, the method that employs the accumulated capital
sufficient to generate enough income is the
a. capital retention
b. capital liquidation
c. capitalistic system
d. communist system
8. According to the Malaysian tax code, insurance premiums or other contributions made for the
benefit of an employee to an unapproved provident fund or scheme by the employer _______
____ for tax deduction
a. qualify
b. do not qualify
9. According to Section 34(4) of the Income Tax Act, deduction allowed on the contributions
made by employer to an approved fund is up to ____________ of the remuneration of the
participating employee.
a. 19%
b. 10%
c. 12%
d. 17%
10. The tax benefits for approved plans can be substantial for the contributors and the recipient of
the plan. These benefits can include:
i. Contributions made by the employer are tax allowable, subject to the limit set by the tax
code which is adjusted from time to time
ii. Contributions made by the employee are deductible from his taxable income, again subject
to certain limit set by law
iii. Withdrawals from the funds by the employees are not considered taxable income in their
hands
a. ii only
b. i only
c. i and ii only
d. i, ii and iii
Answers: 1-B, 2-A, 3-C, 4-B, 5-B, 6-B, 7-A, 8-B, 9-A, 10-D.