0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views14 pages

Globalization Part Two

Globalization at BC final notes

Uploaded by

rousejo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views14 pages

Globalization Part Two

Globalization at BC final notes

Uploaded by

rousejo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

East Asia

●​ Japans Tokugawa Shogunate

○​ Rejected globalization, however, did not entirely reject regional trade

○​ Robust agricultural production

■​ New strains of rice led to population growth

○​ Many people used Japanese-imported tobacco, which led to its similar use to tea.

○​ Economy

■​ Close ties with rural and urban economies

●​ The government would step in when locals do things like

deforestation that caused mass flooding.

■​ No large-scale industrialization, however, a big focus on boutique goods

○​ Culture

■​ Major cities became marketplaces/cultural centers

●​ Kyoto was a significant part of this

■​ Lisuarly activities

●​ Poetry and literature were huge

○​ Highest rates of literacy

●​ Vices were rampant

○​ gambling, drinking, and sex work in licensed cities

●​ Kabuki Theater

○​ Plays that offer attractive windows into gender/sexuality

○​ First was created to advertise female sex work who were

actresses
■​ This caused social unrest, which caused them not to

be allowed to work, so they allowed only men to do

it

■​ This did not work, so they only allowed a select

group of males

Ming to Qinq

●​ Ming China

○​ Currency

■​ Precious metals were losing value, so they changed to paper currency

●​ They created a lot of inflation

■​ Solved this by implementing silver

●​ 90% of taxes by 1570 were paid in silver

○​ This was a law

●​ Standardized prices along the vast Ming empire

●​ However, they had very little silver

○​ They have to bring in silver from Spain

○​ Galleon Trade

■​ Silk and porcelain for Spanish (American Silver)

●​ China began to create porcelain for Europeans

○​ Using Latin and displaying the Virgin Mary on it

○​ The Ming state did not borrow money, leading to high taxation, which caused

problems among the working class.

○​ Ming and American staple crops


■​ The Ming dynasty began using American crops, which led to deforestation

to make way for these crops to grow. This led to flooding, which became

out of control.

●​ Ming China Crises

○​ Structural problems

■​ Corruption leads to taxes not coming to the state

■​ The employer was isolated to the state, making it difficult for the empire

to govern the state.

○​ Weak military

■​ Bad leadership led to military revolts

○​ Climate catastrophes

■​ Manchuria was particularly hard hit by these famines

■​ The Little Ice Age caused these

○​ Weak leadership

■​ The emperors circled through many high leadership roles quickly, leading

to structural problems with the leadership.

○​ Silver Trade

■​ In 1639, the Japanese stopped their trade with Europe and China, keeping

their silver to themselves.

■​ Spain weakened and cracked down on silver smuggling to China because

they wanted it for themselves.

●​ Manchi Rebels
○​ The rebels stopped paying taxes and began declaring war on the Ming because of

the fallout during the effects of the Little Ice Age.

China and Japan Big Picture

●​ We can see the increase in powerful sovereign states with governed persons

●​ China embrace

Joint Stock Companies

How the Joint Stock Companies Transform Capitalism

●​ Joint Stock company

○​ Each member owns shares of capital, pools the capital, and minimizes individual

risk.

■​ The early ones we look at are run by boards of directors

○​ The time these became popular was during the time of mercantilism

○​ Overseas colonies are a critical factor in the rise

○​ Colonialism and the rise of joint stock companies

■​ Colonies should export more wealth than they import

●​ Colonies were expected to only trade with the companies in which

their colonizers presided (monopolies)

○​ 17th-century Asian powers dominated Indian Ocean Trade

○​ During the early years of joint stock companies Europeans were limited to trading

posts, and Asian societies benefited initially more than Europeans did

■​ Example: textiles demand boosted

○​ By 1700, Europeans were favored


■​ When companies fell apart in the Indies, the Dutch or the British

consolidated power

Dutch East India Company

●​ Dutch traveled through the Spice Islands in 1590s

●​ Dutch traders in 1598, war broke out between Dutch and Spanish/Porugesse

○​ Incentivized the Dutch to start focusing on going for the Spanish/Portuguese trade

●​ Dutch had low interest rates, which led to them being able to borrow more money than

others

●​ Dutch also allowed shares to be bought and sold (an early precursor to the stock

exchange)

●​ Dutch government persuaded merchants to stop using Spanish/Portuguese trade by

stopping the spice trade

●​ VOC charter

○​ They had the right to wage war, arrest people, etc

■​ Armed trading

○​ They had the powers of a government

○​ They made new laws to justify informal colonial expansion

○​ This leads to a Eurocentric International Law

■​ Still, see the effects today

●​ Key items

○​ Spices, coffee, tea,

●​ The company aimed to secure both trade monopolies and monoscines (one buyer)

●​ Aimed to fix prices


●​ Took less aggressive measures on powers like England/China than Portuguese/Spanish

●​ Cost of doing business

○​ Warships, military-trained men

●​ VOC militaristic turn (20 years into the VOC)

○​ Jan Pieterzoon Coen: trade isn't possible without war, and war isn't possible

without trade

○​ Local leaders who did not honor contracts were pursued with military force

○​ 1617 English ships and local leaders (Jakarta) blockaded VOC access to ports

○​ The VOC then seized it and renamed it Batavia

○​ VOC did not aim to replace local leadership fully but rather to bend them entirely

to the interest of the Dutch

○​ The Dutch before long displaced the Portuguese from everywhere except Goa in

the Indian Ocean.

■​ In 1622, VOC partnered with the English to get the Portuguese out of the

Straits of Hormuz.

■​ Sometimes partnered with local leaders

■​ 1641 took Malacca from the Portuguese to expand the spice trade

■​ 1638, the VOC started a series of wars on Sri Lanka, and by 1658, they

ousted them completely

●​ VOC then enslaved locals and cut out local middlemen

○​ Armed trading

■​ Advancing economic interests through force

○​ Dutch trade with Japan, and they were the only Europeans to be able to
●​ VOC collapse

○​ Corruption

■​ They exploited employees

●​ High mortality rates

■​ Changes to trade

●​ Less demand for goods in Southeast Asia

○​ Dutch didn't do well in the war versus the British

■​ Undermined their naval power

English East India Company

●​ Started in 1599 and got a royal charter in 1600

○​ Queen Elizabeth wanted to do this to displace the Spanish and Portuguese Rivals.

●​ EIC successfully displaced Spainssh/Portuguese in the Indies and the Arabian peninsula

●​ Between 1613 and 1617, the Dutch had almost twice as many ships

●​ EIC operated on a factory system

○​ Left behind representatives

●​ British looked to monopolize trade by securing trading posts

○​ 1615 conquered Surat, Madras 1639, Bombay 1668, Calcutta/Bengal 1690

●​ After conflicts with the Mughal empire, the company paid a fine and was able to establish

a base of operation near Bengal

●​ By the 16th Century, they had nearly two dozen forts

●​ Similar to VOC, the EIC made an aggressive turn

○​ Began war with the Mughals in the 1680s, which initially did not go very well
○​ By the 18th century, the Mughal Empire was exploited by the EIC to secure a

tax-free trade monopoly

○​ 1757, the governor of EIC, Robert Clive, conquered the state of Bengal overnight

■​ The EIC was able to collect taxes and had the state power to tax people by

1765

●​ Bengal Famine

○​ EIC control of many places had negatives like this

○​ Famine started with a series of droughts in 1768

○​ EIC made this worse by forcing the collection of taxes regardless of whether or

not you were able to pay

○​ Hoarded the rice for the military

○​ Exported grains and did not care about local Benglis

○​ It is estimated that 10 million of the 30 million population died

●​ EIC skewed trade so that it was only as accessible as the British allowed it to be

●​ British did not look to displace Mughal practices. Instead, they ruled through the local

leaders, using them as puppets

●​ Britain established a monopoly on opium, which helped it influence trade with China

●​ India's economy suffered from the EIC

○​ India started exporting raw cotton

■​ Contributed to a trade imbalance

●​ EIC collapse

○​ The EIC had a rebellion in which it defeated the rebels, but the crown thought that

it was more important to focus on direct rule.


Origins of Capitalism

●​ Historians and economists debate the start of capitalism

●​ The role of joint stock companies played a significant role in the growth of capitalism

○​ They were a vital part of the spread of capitalism

○​ They allowed companies to become more prominent than most could imagine

■​ Pooling money and minimizing individual risk

○​ These companies started other companies like banks, insurance companies, and

stock exchanges.

■​ Not just growing joint stock companies but bringing in new industries and

businesses

●​ These companies relied on extensive communications networks and overseas trade.

●​ They began to move away from the old trading model

○​ More of the world was being brought under a Eurocentric model

●​

One of the reasons Europeans enjoyed such dominance in trade was their exploitation of cheap

labor.

Collapse of the Mughals

Recap of Gunpowder Empires

●​ Babur Mughal founder

○​ They expanded a lot because they allowed many cultures they conquered to

flourish even under his rule.

●​ Akbar
○​ One of the wealthiest empires

Collapse of the Mughals

●​ The empire reached its territorial peak under Emperor Aurangzeb

○​ Aggressive military campaigns

○​ Changed Mughal policies

■​ Suppressed things like alcohol, prostitution

○​ Reimposed the tax on Hindus

○​ Motivated his expansionist policies but created many enemies due to these

policies

○​ Dynasty's last effective leader

●​ Weaknesses of Mughals

○​ The things that helped them build the huge empire came to be weaknesses

■​ Gunpowder weapons: the weapons failed to keep up with the times,

becoming inefficient

●​ The thing that made them powerful first was gunpowder

■​ High taxation of the state angered a lot of peasants, and a heavy focus on

luxury cost the wealth not trickling down, leading to the peasants

becoming angry.

●​ When Mughal leaders raised taxes, people suffered.

■​ The bureaucracy that kept it afloat was plagued with corruption

●​ Became harder for the central state to extract things from the

empire

■​ Succession issues
●​ Leaders often had very short reigns, causing many problems with

laws. Short turnover leads to instability.

■​ Rebellions that occur

●​ With the appearance of Seekism, they began rebelling against them

in 1710

●​ Local leaders also became more independent of the Mughal

empire, not seeing a need for the heavy rule of the Mughals

Mughals Collapse

●​ This led to many different people trying to gain control of local rulers, and VOC sought

to gain a lot of power from them.

Safavids Collapse

●​ Shah Abbas

○​ Successful leaders wanted to centralize power

○​ Pressed into Afghanistan, defeating Mughals and local leaders

○​ Less religious coexistent

○​ Reached their peak under him

■​ Were mainly in Iran

●​ After he died in 1629, issues came up

○​ Leadership issues

■​ Generally less competent

○​ The design of centralizing land to the state

■​ This requires many people to lead, and this breeds corruption

○​ Crossroads of Global Trade


■​ Many people would cut through the Safavids, which initially helped, but

the goods flowed away due to a lack of demand, leading to the Safavids

losing money.

○​ Europeans found other sources of silk.

■​ So much of the Safavid economy was pegged to silk

○​ Safavid military diminished

■​ The leaders were focused on trying to convert people, which caused many

rebellions. Without a strong military, they became unsuccessful.

Safavid Collapse players

●​ Afghan leaders started rebelling against the Safavids

●​ Russia, under Peter the Great, began attacking Safavid positions

●​ Nader Shah

○​ Turkoman military commander

■​ He began pushing everyone who was in play in the Safavid Empire out

●​ Even a little bit of the Ottomans

Ottomans

●​ Large territorial empire

●​ Rivals of the Safavids and Europeans

●​ Ottoman state during the fall of safavids and the mughal collapse transformed

●​ Had an elite core of Janisarrys (their military)

●​ European military changed techniques and became bigger in size

○​ A shift towards having a huge army occurred in the world


●​ Ottomans shifted to having a focus on a massive amount of troops that had gunpowder

weapons

○​ They employed peasants as temporary troops and did not enjoy the same

privileges as janissary

○​ Many in the 1590s rebelled because they did not want their guns to be taken away

■​ Ottomans would appease to these local leaders by giving them land etc

●​ However, this angered the Jannisarys, who got made, and in 1602,

the Janisarrys killed the Ottoman sultan because of things like this

●​ Ottomans peaked right before their siege of Vienna in 1683, but the rest of Europe fought

against them because of Europeans' fear of Islamic powers

●​ The Ottomans then retreated to Serbia, which led to other countries taking advantage of

this and had to eventually sign a treaty in 1699 that gave up a lot of their power in central

Europe

●​ After this defeat, the Sultan was executed

●​ Losing Vienna was a big moment in history but was not inevitable

○​ European powers had to pool together to help defeat the Ottomans

○​ It is a turning point that could have had other endings

The Enlightenment

Enlightenment

●​ A firm belief in and a desire to spread universal beliefs, principles and frameworks

around the world

●​ Also presumed to enact laws that go beyond the natural world

○​ International laws
○​ Freedom law

●​ Enlightenment got us closer to the modern world: nation-states and capitalism.

○​ Sovereignty, science, technology

●​ The homogenization of the globe starts with the enlightenment

●​ Europeans thought that not only that their ideas were the best and better intrinsically than

everyone but they thought they had cracked the code for international law

●​ Science was not meant to re

Global Piracy

Barbary Pirates

●​ Mediteranen Sea

○​ 1500s to ninthenth century

●​ Took off during the Spanish reconquiesta

●​ Crossed the mediterranean

●​ Crosiars

○​ Supposed to be hired to be mercenaries

Barbabry pirates interacted with empires and forced people to think about maritime law

You might also like