0% found this document useful (0 votes)
60 views4 pages

Hyperstatic Moment

The document discusses the concept of 'hyperstatic moment' in prestressed concrete beams, explaining that it arises from the boundary conditions of the beam that counteract deflections caused by prestress. It clarifies that while prestress creates internal stresses, it does not generate external loads, and in hyperstatic beams, additional reactions are necessary to maintain equilibrium. The document concludes that hyperstatic moments are not present in isostatic beams, which can accommodate deflections without resistance.

Uploaded by

hpideasse
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
60 views4 pages

Hyperstatic Moment

The document discusses the concept of 'hyperstatic moment' in prestressed concrete beams, explaining that it arises from the boundary conditions of the beam that counteract deflections caused by prestress. It clarifies that while prestress creates internal stresses, it does not generate external loads, and in hyperstatic beams, additional reactions are necessary to maintain equilibrium. The document concludes that hyperstatic moments are not present in isostatic beams, which can accommodate deflections without resistance.

Uploaded by

hpideasse
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Engineering

What is "hyperstatic moment"?


Asked 4 years, 7 months ago Modified 4 years, 7 months ago Viewed 2k times

Above is a picture I found online, showing a prestressed concrete beam. It mentions a


"hyperstatic moment".

When a beam is prestressed, it deflects upwards. According to the picture, this deflection
needs to be counteracted by an additional reaction at the center, which in turn creates the
hyperstatic reactions at the ends. But isn't this upward deflection the whole idea of using
prestressed concrete? Isn't this deflection counteracted by the working load on the beam?
Isn't the idea to design the prestress so that when the intended load on the beam occurs, it
balances the deflection from prestress and the beam is straight again? Why do we need to
discuss this hyperstatic reaction as something separate?
civil-engineering

Share Improve this question Follow asked Jan 13, 2021 at 14:59
S. Rotos
2,311 6 33 57

1 Answer Sorted by: Highest score (default)

To understand the hyperstatic moment, we need to first remember that prestress is, by
definition, the application of an internal stress state on the beam. Therefore, it cannot
2 generate external loads on the beam. That is, if you had a beam floating in space and then
you applied some prestress to that beam, it would deform but not present any rigid body
motion.

Without loss of generality, this can be easily seen with a simplification of your case, where
instead of parabolic prestress we have polygonal prestress which only applies concentrated
force at the points of curvature (just get the maxima and minima of your parabolas and then
connect them with straight lines).

If we then apply this prestress to a simply-supported beam, we see that no reaction forces are
generated, even though we have a non-zero bending moment diagram:

However, if we then look at the deflection of the beam, we can see that even though the
midspan has a downwards force applied to it, the beam as a whole still displays a positive
camber.

But then we remember that you aren't dealing with a simply-supported beam, but a
hyperstatic (or statically indeterminate) one, with a support at the middle. So what'll happen
in the real case? Well, the support won't allow the camber at midspan to occur, which it does
by generating a downwards force (reaction) on the beam at it's "midspan".
If we simply isolate the effect of that midspan reaction (by replacing it with a concentrated
force), we get the hyperstatic moment diagram*; note that if we add it to the bending
moment of the isostatic case, we get exactly the same as in the hyperstatic case (the values
are actually a bit off — 4.0 at midspan here and 3.8 above — because of rounding, I should've
used more decimal places when defining the force):

If we were to look at the deflections, we'd note the deflection at midspan is precisely equal
and opposite to that found in the isostatic case, ensuring the support's boundary condition is
satified.

So here we can see that the hyperstatic moment is the moment generated by a beam's
boundary conditions to counteract the deflections caused by the prestress. If you came up
with a prestressing configuration that satisfied all boundary conditions (for example,
generating zero deflection at the midspan support), then there'd be no reaction forces to that
prestress and therefore no hyperstatic moment. But in practice that never happens.

An isostatic (statically indeterminate) beam, however, will never present a hyperstatic moment
because it can simply accommodate these deflections instead of resisting them.

* Those who are paying attention will notice that my choice of the central support as the one to be replaced by a
concentrated force was entirely arbitrary. I could just as easily have chosen the left or right supports instead, creating
simply-supported beams with cantilevers. However, the choice is irrelevant; whichever one is chosen, the diagram will
be identical.

Diagrams created with Ftool, a free educational 2D frame analysis tool.

Share Improve this answer Follow answered Jan 13, 2021 at 18:34
Wasabi
13.2k 8 39 62
1 like always, detailed and easy to follow answer.+1 – kamran Jan 13, 2021 at 20:28

Thank you, very detailed! – S. Rotos Jan 16, 2021 at 9:21

Start asking to get answers


Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

civil-engineering

See similar questions with these tags.

You might also like