0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views2 pages

Review Report - B.4 R1 & R2

Uploaded by

harshit tiwari
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views2 pages

Review Report - B.4 R1 & R2

Uploaded by

harshit tiwari
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

GATS Project

Review Report

(Round 1)

Sheet – Deliverable B4

Reviewed Sector- Finance Sector

Sector Completed By- Harshit Tiwari

Sector Reviewed By- Satyansh Parmar

Review-

Deliverable B.4 Financial Services is accurate.


Only refinements needed:

• Make Mode 1 restrictions more explicit in securities/advisory regulations.


• Clarify that some PPR measures (RBI, SEBI prudential controls) are safeguards
rather than trade restrictions.
• Use of / instead of, is confusing while observing obligation
• Fine tune the sub sector and section a bit as it looks extremely filled with
information whereas it just needs the relevant sub sector and section.
• Repetition and Overlaps: Some measures appear multiple times (e.g.,
Depositories Act 1996 listed twice with IFSC amendments).
• Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation Act also appear in
different forms. These should be consolidated for clarity.
• No mention of state cooperative banking laws, state financial corporations,
stamp duty on securities, or state-level levies which may affect financial
services.
• Depth of SMBD & LP Analysis: SMBD obligations appear only in a few entries
(e.g., Foreign Venture Capital Investors, FDI caps with board composition). More
systematic identification of where Indian nationality/residency is mandated
(directors, trustees, auditors) is needed.
• Some entries show detailed section numbers; others cite only broad provisions.
Needs uniform citation.
GATS Project

Review Report

(Round 2)

Sheet – Deliverable B4

Reviewed Sector- Transport Sector

Sector Completed By- Uttkarsh Singh

Sector Reviewed By- Satyansh Parmar

Review:

Deliverable B.4 Transport Services is accurate.


Only refinements needed:

• Obligations Mapping Gaps: While MA & NT are well covered, LP (Local Presence)
and SMBD are inconsistently flagged.
Example: Requirements for Indian citizen pilots, directors in Indian airlines, or
Indian-resident ship captains should be explicitly highlighted under SMBD/LP.
• Overlaps & Repetitions: Multiple references to the same statutes without
consolidation (e.g., Merchant Shipping Act entries split across cabotage,
licensing, safety).
• Could be streamlined by grouping provisions under one Act with sub-entries.
• Formatting & Consistency Issues: Some entries have detailed section references;
others list only Act names.
• Sub Sector is filled with multiple sub sector which make it seem like a clutter.
Please rely on the most relevant one and remove the unnecessary data.
• Consolidate Overlaps: Group Merchant Shipping Act provisions into one
consolidated entry. Do the same for Civil Aviation & Railways.
• Strengthen SMBD & LP Analysis: Explicitly flag residency/nationality restrictions
for pilots, ship captains, airline directors, port trustees. Local presence
requirements for freight forwarders, customs brokers, logistics operators.

You might also like