Financial Management in Local Government: The Challenges and Prospects of The 21 Century - Nigeria Perspective
Financial Management in Local Government: The Challenges and Prospects of The 21 Century - Nigeria Perspective
United Kingdom ISSN 2348 0386 Vol. VIII, Issue 8, August 2020
[Link]
Abstract
Globally, government pursued various form of public Financial Management (FM) reforms to
enhance Local Government (LG) performance. A poor FM has contributed to the failure and
inefficiency of LG in achieving substantial development while most LG faces the problems of
wide gap between citizens’ needs and the financial resources. Therefore, this call for better
understanding of the concept, challenges, steps and roles of FM in LG. It is against this
background that the study examined FM in LG with a view to determining its contribution to the
economy, efficiency and effectiveness of LG administration. The study employed an exploratory
research design with focus on relevant literatures. The study concluded that LG administrators
should act in the same manner as their counterparts in the private sectors based on modern FM
practices, this will increase efficiency, financial capability, transparency and accountability in
goods and services delivery. In addition, a sound internal control mechanism should be put in
place to minimise the level of fraud, corruptions and wastages affecting LG system and its
grassroots development. Besides, LG should always prepare accurate and reliable annual
budget while financial planning and control should be seen as an important aspect of an
effective FM.
INTRODUCTION
All over the world, government adopts various strategies and approach for good governance at
the grassroots level. The government at the grassroots is called local government. Local
government exist through the process of democratisation and full participation of citizens at the
grassroots level in decision making. Its establishment is to serve two purposes, firstly, as
administrative body for providing goods and services for the need of the citizens within the
locality. Secondly, as a democratic set-up for full representation of community members in
decision making at the local government level. Local government plays a vital role in socio-
economic development of the grassroots, either rural or urban setting. It is the government that
is closest to the grassroots by making governance and service delivery available to citizens at
the community level. It also aid the development of the grassroots administratively and
politically. According to Sikander (2015), social, political or economic development becomes
meaningful and real when it comes from the grassroots which is the lowest society’s level.
Mbieli (2018) stated that no nation can be termed developed when its villages are lagging
behind and its cities going ultra-modern. It is the local government that balance the equations
between the cities and the villages through developmental programmes in order to achieve
public policies. Globally, government has pursued various form of public financial management
reforms to enhance local government performance in areas of accountability, transparency,
rules of law compliance and service delivery to the generality of the citizens within the
community.
Finance is the fuel of any form of administration, either private or public. At the local
government level, it constitutes the lubricants for the wheel of good administration. According to
Aborishade and Marshall (1981) cited in Hassan (2011), finance is a thread that runs round the
cloth, if the thread is pulled wrongly at one end, it will affect the design of the cloth and destroy
its beauty. Therefore, finance in any organization must be handled with care and must be
disbursed according to laid down rules and regulations. A sound financial administration is the
core of good efficient, effectives and equity which are the guiding principles of financial
management. Efficiency is the ability to achieve maximum results at minimise cost,
effectiveness deals with expenditure relevance in meeting the management objectives, while
equity ensures justice and fair play in all management activities. The overriding factor in local
government financial management is the basic operation of financial services in a competitive,
efficient and cost effective manner. Besides, the efficient management of local government
finances is constrained by the political impunity of state governors and this has undermined
grassroots developments (Otinche, 2014). Financial administration which is the crux of financial
management is the art and science of financial planning, coordinating, organising and
evaluating of local government financial resources in order to achieve the best objectives, goals
and performance targets. The objective of financial management in Local Government aligns
with the three components highlighted above. Olowe (2011) defined financial management as
the management of business finance in order to achieve business or organisation objectives.
The word management connotes planning, coordinating, controlling and monitoring
organizational financial resources. At the Local Government level, financial management is the
appropriate steps taking to ensure proper revenues generation and further utilisation of such
financial resources in line with Local Government objectives, goals and citizen’s expectation.
In Nigeria, the major challenge to local government administration is funds, this has
dwindle over times due to economic depression and financial melt-down while in the recent
time, this has been aggravated by the event of COVID-19 pandemic that occurred all over the
world. This financial meltdown has contributed to the low space of growth and development in
local government in areas of socio-economic developments and provision of viable
developmental projects. The number of abandon projects in local government due to lack of
funds because of mismanagement, misallocation and inefficient uses of funds is enormous,
thereby jeopardising the well-being of the citizens within the locality. This poor financial
management approach has contributed to the basic failure and inefficiency of some local
government in achieving substantial development of their locality, while in recent times, this had
led to lack of trust, faith and confidence in local government administration. Besides, the
persistent hijack and control of local government statutory allocation and financial resources by
some state governors, has also negatively affects the performance of these local governments
in carrying out their constitutional responsibilities. The introduction of state joint local
government account has reduced the power of financial autonomy and strength to advanced
sustainable development at the grassroots. In some instances, joint account is used to compel
local government to engage in joint project(s) with little or no relevance to the citizens within the
local government or projects that is outside the immediate needs of that locality. Wada and
Aminu (2014) opined that state and local government joint account allocation committee
coupled with much supervision of various ministries and agencies have made the financial
autonomy of local government a mirage. At present, most local governments faces the problems
of wide gap between citizens’ needs in their locality and the financial resources required for
meeting such needs or demands. This gap occurred at times due to population increases;
misallocation of functions and revenues; the high cost of standard of service required in areas
such as education, health, environment, water infrastructure and others; leakages in internally
generated revenues through pilferages, corruption and lack of will of revenue officers; and
inefficient machineries to produce and deliver good public goods and services.
As a key players in the provision of fundamental basic public services delivery, most local
government in developing countries, faces rapid and chaotic urbanization due to impacts of
frequent natural disasters caused by climate change (UN-Habitat, 2015). Also, there has been
high level of negative perception of financial management in local governments. This at time,
due to inadequate internal control system to checkmate the excessive fraudulent activities on
revenue collections and insertion of ghost employees’ names in the local government payroll
system, this has resulted in loss and leakages of funds which is tailored towards
mismanagement and corruption pertaining to local government administrations. This has
resulted into local government failure in its responsibility of meeting citizens’ demands in the
provision of public goods and services.
Local Government needs to plan to ensure that enough financial resources are available
at all time in order to meet the needs of the Local Government expenditure in achieving the set
goals and objectives. Good financial management enhances an effective management and
functioning of local government administration. Financial management are beneficial to the local
government when financial resources are properly planned and executed in the best interest of
the citizens. Finance is very important to any organization whether private or public sector as all
expenditures in various department either capital or recurrent rest on the availability of required
financial resources. Finance is an applied field of management and it differs from accounting.
Accounting is concerned with measuring, recording and reporting of economic and social
activities at the local government level, using double entry principles and control in keeping
organisational financial data. Accounting data are historical in nature but could be a better
pointer to the future. Accounting is all about timeliness, relevancy and quality of financial
information while finance uses accounting information to make economic and social
development decision that will achieve the desired objectives and goals. Financial management
has become a things of interest to academician, financial managers and policy makers at the
local government level, termed grassroots governance. To the academicians, the focus is how
the practice of financial management can enhance financial resources planning and control at
the local government level. To the financial managers and policy makers, since most decision at
the local government relates to financial resources, better understanding of the theory of
financial management along with its conceptual and analytical knowledge in decision making is
required. Financial management in modern day approach has grown beyond revenue collection
and payment of expenditure but includes the rigorous financial decision making in areas such as
investment, capital budgeting, project management and sound financial control. Therefore, a
sound financial management practices in local government will aid long term economic, social,
and infrastructural sustainability of local government in Nigeria. The objective of this study is to
assess financial management in local government with a view to determining its contribution to
the economy, efficiency and effectiveness of local government administration. The theoretical
implication of the study is the contribution to knowledge and literatures as financial management
in local government and public sector in general is still an emerging issue with less related
research.
international trade, national defence, financial institution and foreign policies. Local government
is responsible for the management of local affairs by the local people within a given locality of
village, town, district, city or specified jurisdiction. The word local government is derived from
two words, local and government. Local relates to interaction of common group of people
confined in the same area like village, district, cantonment, county or municipality. While the
word government, means the autonomous nature self-taxation, self-direction, and legal entity
(Mbieli, 2018). Government is the machinery put in place to regulate human conducts and
behaviours in a particular locality through the means of laws enacted and enforceable
(Adebayo, Dada & Olarewaju, 2014). Therefore, local government is the government of local
communities within a particular geographical location, practicing self-government and managing
their affairs with derived powers, roles and functions from a constituted documents or statutory
laws. Looking from the political or democratic angle, it is a tier of government closest to the
citizens, it has the constitutional responsibilities to guarantee political, social and economic
developments of its geographical areas and the citizens.
Legal framework for financial management practices and standards in local government
in Nigeria
The accounting practices and some standards addresses various financial management issues
in respect of transparency, accountability, consistency, integrity, economy and value for money
decision. In respect of financial reporting, financial management ensure that report are not only
timely and reliable but also a useful document for decision making by the various interest
groups or stakeholders. The legal framework for financial management in Nigeria involves the
followings:
1. Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (hereafter called the 1999 constitution)
This provides the general framework for local government financial administration and controls
of public funds. It outline the various types of government funds, revenues and expenditures
patterns. It provides the basis for reporting financial transactions in government in terms of
budgeting, accounting and auditing.
2. The Finance (Control and Management) Act 1958 as amended and now referred to as
CAP F 26 LFN 2004
This outlines the management and general operation of public funds. It regulates the accounting
systems, outline the various books of account to be maintained and the process and procedure
to be followed in the preparation of government final account and financial statements.
3. The Annual Appropriation Acts as provided for by 1999 constitution.
This is an annual budget process of the revenues and expenditures to be embarked upon within
a particular calendar year as approved by the appropriate legislative arms of local government.
4. The Public Procurements Act 2007 as amended.
The Act aimed to ensure transparency, probity, accountability, competitiveness, efficiency and
effectiveness in local government procurements of goods, services and execution of works.
5. The Fiscal Responsibility Act 2007.
Financial control in government was re-affirmed through the passing into law in 2007, the Fiscal
Responsibility Acts 2007. The Act aimed at installing the best practices in public financial
management, thereby, enthralling transparency, accountability and good governance in public
sector. The objectives of FRA Acts is to promote transparency in budget preparation, execution
and reporting; strengthen accountability and sound financial management in government;
ensure high standards in financial disclosure; ensure prudent management of financial
resources; and ensure access to comprehensive information on government financial activities
by the citizens.
6. The Treasury and Finance Circulars
These are various forms of directives and guidelines issued by ministry of finance to guides the
conduct of public sector financial management.
7. The Financial Memoranda.
This is a third tier legal framework which serves as an instrument of accounting and financial
control. It outlines rules on action acceptable and those deemed unacceptable in local
government. It is a body of governing rules and record keeping. It covers areas and approaches
to financial reporting, sources of funds, expenditure allocation patterns; and funds management.
8. International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (IPSASB).
9. Local Government Administrative Laws
10. Local Government Bye Laws.
11. The Audit Act (1956)
This outlines the process and guidelines on the audit of local government financial statements.
NFIU is the Nigeria arms of global financial intelligence units initially domiciled in Economic and
Financial Crime Commission (EFCC). It is meant to comply with international standards on
combating money laundering and financing of terrorism and proliferation. It draws its power from
Money laundering prohibition Act 2011 as amended 2012 and EFCC establishment Act 2004, it
became fully operational in 2005. According to NFIU Act 2018, NFIU now domiciled in Central
Bank of Nigeria (CBN) but will remain autonomous in independent. On 6th May 2019, NFIU
issued guidelines aimed at reducing vulnerabilities created by cash withdrawals from Local
Governments funds throughout the country. This guidelines stopped the state governors, banks,
other financial institutions, public officers and other stakeholders from tampering with local
government fund effective June 1, 2019. NFIU having realized through analysis, that cash
withdrawal and transactions of the State and Local Government Joint Accounts (SLGJA), poses
biggest corruption, money laundering and security threats at the grassroots levels and to the
entire financial system in the country, decided to uphold the full provisions of section 162 (6)
(8)of the 1999 Nigerian Constitution as amended which designated State Joint Local
Government Account into which shall be paid allocations to the local government councils of the
state from the federation account and the amount standing to the credit of local government
councils of a state shall be distributed among the local government councils of that state and not
for other purposes. This directive implies that each Local Government can now spend its funds
freely without taking directives from governors who hijacked the monthly allocations of the third
tier of government under the guise of State Joint Local Government Accounts. This guidelines
for funds control had been released to the Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, Chief
Executive Officers of all Banks and other financial institutions, the Chairman, Independent
Corrupt Practices Commission (ICPC) and Economic, and Financial Crimes Commission
(EFCC).
will only exist for the receipt of allocation to be shared to only local governments in accordance
with section 162(7) of the 1999 constitution as amended and not for any other transactions or
purposes. It encourage local government to have a single salary account, single revenue
account and single running cost account and not to maintain additional accounts for purpose of
mitigating money laundering and helping investigation and accountability. Cash withdrawal from
any local government accounts have cumulative withdrawal of ₦500,000 per day while other
form of payment to be done through a valid crossed cheques or electronic funds transfer. All
financial transactions by the Local government will be registered and monitored by NFIU
through E-payment module.
Sanctions/ penalties
Any withdrawal done in violation to all the provision mentioned by any financial institutions or
designated non-financial institution or their agent in whatever name or form will attract an instant
penalty of one hundred percent (100%) refund of the amount withdrawn in the contravention
and this is to be effected by CBN, EFCC, ICPC or NFIU. Any public officer anywhere in the
country or any private citizens found undermining or violating these guidelines will be
investigated and prosecuted under the NFIU Act 2018, Money laundering Act 2011 as
amended, EFCC Act 2004 or ICPC Act 2000.
Investment decision – this involves the judicious utilization of financial resources on existing
viable opportunity, with a view of earning good returns to the provider of fund or resources
(Hassan, 2010). In local government, investment decision result from the utilization of (a)
internally generated revenue and statutory allocation to finance projects (b) probably fund raised
through loans or bonds from the money and capital market to finance projects and
infrastructural developments. Investment decision on viable projects is arrived at after due
project evaluation. This evaluation is not only based on financial benefits but also on the
economic, social and sustainable benefits to the citizens. Investment decision making is a core
managerial function by the executive committee of the local government. In public sector, the
most prominent investment evaluation techniques is the Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA). CBA
determined the viability of public sector projects in terms of multitude of benefits derivable from
the project with the associated cost and along with externalities assessment. It is designed to
assess economic viability of projects from the view point of the citizens and the society. It
enhanced project appraisal in public sector with proper investment planning, communal policy
and development policy being evaluated.
Financing decision – local government financing decision focus is on the traditional taxing
power to generate revenue and the collection of statutory allocation. Local government in
Nigeria has three sources of revenue, these are external, internally generated revenue and
loan. The Nigeria 1999 constitution section 162 (10) defines revenue as any income or returns
accruing to or derived by the government from any source and includes: any receipt however
described arising from the operation of any law; any receipt however described from or in
respect of any property held by the government; and any returns by way of interest on loans and
dividends in respect of shares or interest held by government in any company or statutory body.
The role of government finance is to link the cost of government’s activity against a defined
outputs.
2. Local license fees and fines – These are licenses approved for various commercial activities
at the grassroots such as general licenses (bicycle licenses and hackney permit fees); food
control (slaughter and bakery licenses fees); social (merriment, marriage, street naming, radio
and television licenses fees); economic (tender fees and contract registration fees); hire of
plants and sale of unserviceable equipment and goods.
3. Earning from commercial undertakings – This involves revenues from motor parks, markets,
investments, agricultural produces and other commercial activities.
4. Rent – These are proceeds from government properties such as landed property, building
either for commercial or residential, parks and events center.
5. Interest / Dividend – These are incomes from any form of financial investments such as fixed
deposits, debenture and shares.
6. Miscellaneous Receipts – These are proceeds from any other forms of sources not classified
under any of such heading above, such from hearse and cemetery, letter of identification, drug
revolving fees, health services and miscellaneous activities.
In addition, other sources of revenues available to the local government with higher authorities
approval for compliance and utilisation are the use of short term funds such as bank overdraft,
money market instruments, invoice discounting, trade credits and factoring; the use of medium
term sources such as venture capital, hire purchase, term loans and mortgage of property; while
the third group is the use of long term sources such as bonds, debentures and investing in
shares through the capital market.
Efficiency/ Value for money decision- measuring performance in public sector (inclusive local
government) is a necessity, it is to ensure transparency, accountability and value for money in
respect of public decision on the use of public funds, and effective performance at all levels of
governance. Information on public sector performance is to enhance public interest and
confidence on governance and opportunity for the government manager to assess their own
performance and outputs. Performance measurement in the public sectors takes account of
economy (whether specific inputs are acquired at the least cost and at appropriate time),
efficiency (how productive inputs are translated into outputs), effectiveness (how output achieve
the desired outcomes), quality of service and financial performance. Efficiency involves the
relationship between the inputs and outputs, it is a vital factors that promote performance in
public sector. It measures the citizens returns on the resources (taxes) invested in governance,
it is based on the comprehensive assessment of outcomes and its longer term impacts on the
citizens, communities and the nation at large. Citizens’ expectation of public services
performances dictates their level of satisfaction with the government and with its goods and
services (James, 2009; Poister & Thomas, 2011). The more efficient service, the more citizens
get value for money from government programmes and projects development while inefficient
services represent resources wastages and loss to the communities and the nation. Efficiency
dividend is a vital factor that dictate on ways and manner government manager makes use of
public funds for the provision of goods and services for the citizens. The public expectation for
public goods and services is rising on daily basis, this is seen in areas such as schools,
hospitals, infrastructural development and high standard of services and programmes in terms
of efficiency, productivity and effectiveness, fairness, trust in government, transparency and
accountability. Value for money reflect transparency and accountability in the use of public
funds for achieving the best maximum benefit from such funds that is available. Efficiency
dividend/decision contributes towards the advancement of government programmes and
policies with least cost, and by achieving best returns and performance on financial resources
used.
Theoretical Review
Efficiency Theory: The efficiency theory of local government administration is justified on the
utility of taxes for social and economic development, and enhancement of individual tax
compliance behaviour to an increase in the revenue collection at local government level. A good
financial management leads to fiscal efficiency and fiscal discipline. This acts as the basis for
good governance at the local government level. Efficiency is the ratio of input to output, the
theory posits that local government should be more efficient than other tiers of government in
terms of service and public goods delivery at the grassroots. It also means the ratio of actual
output to effective capacity. This is where the actual services compared with the effective
capacity at local government level in order to show the level of efficiency achieved, when
compared with other tiers of government. An efficient and effective financial management at the
local government will reduce input and increase output of services. In Nigeria, the 1999
Constitution and Fiscal Responsibility Act (2007) as highlighted in the second schedule part 2
section 4 (1a and b) and the fourth schedule section 7 (1 and 2) stated the modalities for fiscal
efficiency. According to Ezeani (2012) cited in Izueke, Anyadike and Nzekwe (2013), efficiency
theory is justified as the basis for local government existence, to provide the required services to
citizens at the grassroots. As an agent of services delivery and provision of public goods at the
grassroots, it is an avenue to provide these services and public goods more efficiently than the
other tiers of government. The ability to achieve good performance and efficiency service, good
financial management is paramount in managing the resources of the local government. The
efficient use of government funds is to increase government capacity, improves lives and
wellbeing of the citizens and strengthen the foundation of country’s economy by contributing to
the sustainable development. This has profound impact on the citizens and local government
communities at present and the future. It is in line with the objective of public sector to satisfy
citizens’ interest by providing goods and services beneficial to the communities and the citizens.
Empirical review
Uryszek (2013) studied financial management of local governments in Poland with selected
problems. The study showed that public finance sector is decentralised whereas the financial
autonomy at local government is low coupled with low revenue that are unable to covered
expenditures. This resulted into huge local government debts. A system of equalizing grants
was adopted to minimise the horizontal fiscal imbalances. In Nigeria, Eze and Harrison (2013)
studied financial management in local government. The study revealed that lack of technical
manpower and constitutional loopholes for the creation of state and local joint accounts hinders
efficient financial management in local government. The study recommends full financial
autonomy and improved technical personnel at the treasury department of the local
government. While Adebayo, Dada and Olarewaju (2014) in their studied on effective financial
management of local government funds using Ido-Osi local government areas, revealed that
local government needs an urgent improvement on their financial control mechanism, thereby
ensure rationalisation of expenditures patterns in order to achieve optimum performance at local
government level. In addition, Izueke, Anyadike and Nzekwe (2013) studied the management of
local government finance in Nigeria with the challenges and prospects. The study revealed that
management of local government finance are characterize with problems such as lack of long
term financial planning, inappropriate budgetary process and implementation, corruption and
inefficiency in service delivery. The study further recommends that there should be removal of
all forms of cogs in the wheel of local government administration in order to enhance efficiency
in management, good financial planning and sound budgetary process and implementation.
Ohaka, Dagogo and Banyie (2016) studied international public sector accounting
standards and local government financial management in Nigeria. The study reported that
adoption of IPSAS has added value to transparency and accountability in local government
financial management. It was recommended that full adoption of IPSAS in Local government will
improve good governance and sound financial management practices. In the same vain,
Ironkwe and Muenee (2016) studied treasury management and local government development
in Nigeria. The study revealed a positive correlation between treasury management and local
government development. It recommends that local government should ensure sound treasury
management in order to safeguard financial resources required instituting development.
Management should also ensure more revenue are generated while a sound internal control
system should be instituted to monitor and prevent fraud and misappropriation. Due process in
the award of contract and budget implementation should be strictly adhere to. In addition, in the
study carried out by Abdullahi and Ahmad (2018) on good governance and local government
administration in Nigeria. The study revealed that local government performance was quite
dismal due to poor financial management, lack of autonomy and inadequate local leadership.
The study concluded that institutionalization of good governance in local government is the best
strategy for local government sustainable development along with improvement in revenue
collection and judicious utilization of financial resources.
METHODOLOGY
The study employed exploratory research design using relevant books, journals and other
literatures in the field of public sector accounting, local government administration, finance, and
Nigeria constitution. These were reviewed, conclusion drawn with appropriate recommendations
for purpose of increasing the frontiers of knowledge.
CONCLUSION
The prospect of good financial management in local government starts with local
government administrators. Local government administrators or management should act in
the same manner as their counterparts in the private sectors act or work. The private
sectors management put more emphasis on corporate growth, business viability and
maximization of shareholders wealth, in the same vain, local government management
should ensure efficient and effective management of financial resources of local government
for sustainable growth and development; and maximization of citizens’ needs and
expectations. The introduction of modern financial management practices in local
governments will increase efficiency in the management of financial resources and financial
capability, improve debt management and capital investment decision, enhance budget and
budgetary control, and also enhance quality of transparency and accountability in service
delivery. A good financial management is vital to government to achieve value for money
from all public expenditures, reduce government budget deficit and improve budget structure
and reporting, and enhanced good quality of public services. The success of financial
management at local government level depends on the vibrant, efficiency and effectiveness
of the treasury department. The finance and treasury department is the pivot department for
all financial administrations. Therefore, the success or failure of local government lies on the
way and manner the financial management is being administers and maintained. Effective
financial management will enhance rapid development at the local government level and
ensure efficient allocation of scarce resources, in addition, a sound internal audit unit and
control will add value to a good and sound financial management in revenues collections
and expenditures disbursement. A good budget and budgetary control mechanism must be
entrenched for a sound and effective financial management. In addition, ef fective financial
management will minimize the level of fraud and corruptions affecting local government
system and will contribute to development at the grassroots.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Financial planning and control should be seen as an important aspect for effective
financial management.
2. Financial adviser (Council treasurer) should ensure adequate revenues are achieved for
meeting the expected expenditure of the local government.
3. The local government should prepare accurate and reliable budget are prepared with
good budget monitoring and budget plan, for effective implementation and enhancement
of good financial management.
4. Good and sound internal control mechanism should be put in place to minimise fraud
and wastages in financial resources and also to enhance performance in the provision of
public goods and services.
5. Local government should have full financial and administrative autonomy by stopping of
state joint local government allocation account in order to forestall financial resources
and administrative independence.
6. Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) should be in charge of conducting
local government election, this is to guide against imposition by state governor that
breed financial impropriety, indiscipline, corruption, and inefficiency in the administration
of local government affairs.
7. Due process mechanism should be adopted in the procurement and award of contract at
local government level.
8. The accounting system should be improved upon to assist management to plan
operations, keep track of resources, enhance decision making and ensure proper
accountability.
9. The finance of local government should be tightened with appropriate measures in
minimizing loss of council’s fund.
REFERENCES
Abdullahi, A., & Ahmad, S. (2018). Good governance and local government administration in Nigeria. An imperative
for sustainable development. International Journal of Development and Sustainability., 7(4), 1522-1532.
Adebayo, I. A., Dada, A. R., & Olarewaju, O. M. (2014). An appraisal of effective financial management of local
government funds: A case of Ido-Osi loca government area, Nigeria. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting.,
5(17), 33-39.
Akinsulire, O. (2019). Financial management. (10th ed.). Mushin, Lagos, Nigeria: EL-Toda Ventures Ltd.
Banerjee, B. (2009). Fundamentals of financial management. (Special ed.). New Delhi: PHI Learning Private Ltd.
Eze, N. M., & Harrison, O. O. (2013). Financial management in Local governments. The Nigeria experience.
International Journal of Financial Research., 4(4), 146-152.
Federal Republic of Nigeria. (1991). Model Financial Memoranda for Local Government. Lagos, Nigeria: Government
Printers.
Federal Republic Of Nigeria. (1999). Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999. Lagos, Nigeria: Federal
Government Press.
Federal Republic of Nigeria. (2007). Fiscal Responsibility Act and Allocation (2007). Due process handbook. Abuja,
Nigeria: National Planning Commission.
Federal Republic of Nigeria. (1999). The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. Lagos, Nigeria: Government
Printers.
Hassan, M. M. (2011). Financial management in Nigeria local governments. (Revised ed.). Ibadan, Nigeria: University
Press Plc.
Ironkwe, U. L., & Muenee, C. Z. K. (2016). Treasury management and local government development in Nigeria: A
study of Port-Harcourt city local government council. International Journal of Innovative Finance and Economic
Research., 4(4), 21-37.
Izueke, E. M., Anyadike, N. O., & Nzekwe, F. I. (2013). Management of local government finance in Nigeria:
Challenges and prospects. International Journal of Research in Arts and Social Sciences., 5(1), 148-160.
James, O. (2009). Evaluating the expectation disconfirmation and expectations anchoring approach to citizens
satisfaction with public services. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory., 19(1), 107-123.
Khalil, S., & Salihu, A. A. (2011). Modelling local government system in Nigeria. Kuwait Chapter Arabian Journal of
Business and Management Review., 1(1), 136-154.
Mbieli, P. (2018). Local government foundations of democracy (Revised ed.). Lagos, Nigeria: Mirop Mav (Associates
Publication).
Ohaka,J., Dagogo, D. W., & Banyie, J. L. (2016). International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) and local
governent financial management in Nigeria. Journal of Accounting and Financial Management, 2(3), 1-11.
Olowe, R. A. (2011). Financial management, concepts, financial system and business finance. (3rd ed.). Lagos,
Nigeria: Brierly Jones Nigeria Limited.
Otinche, S. I. (2014). Fiscal policy and local government administration in Nigeria. African Research Review., 8(2),
118-137.
Pandey, I. M. (2005). Financial management. (9th ed.). New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House PVT Ltd.
Poister, T. H., & Thomas, J. C. (2011). The effect of expectations and expectancy confirmation/disconfirmation on
motorist satisfaction with state highways. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory., 21(4), 601-617.
Sikander, T. (2015). A theoretical framework of local government. International Journal of Humanities and Social
Science., 5(6), 171-176.
UN-Habitat. (2015). The changes of local government financing in developing countries. United Nation Human
Setlement Programme. Kenya, Nairobi: United Nation.
Uryszek, T. (2013). Financial management of local government in Poland- Selected problems. Journal of Economics,
Business and Management., 1(3), 252-256.
Wada, E., & Aminu, I. (2014). The imperative of local government autonomy and intergovernmental relation in
Nigeria. International Journal of Public Administration and Management Research., 2(3), 74-83.