0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views7 pages

Dynamic Analysis Presentation

Uploaded by

Manoj
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views7 pages

Dynamic Analysis Presentation

Uploaded by

Manoj
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

dynamic-analysis-presentation.

md 2025-09-06

Dynamic Analysis: Understanding Software Runtime


Behavior

Why Software Behaves Differently at Runtime vs. Validation Time


Processing Requirements

Validation Time: Static analysis works with fixed code patterns and predictable input scenarios
Runtime: Dynamic workloads, varying input sizes, and concurrent processing demands
Real Impact: CPU bottlenecks emerge under actual load conditions that static analysis cannot
predict[1][4]

Memory Utilization

Validation Time: Memory allocation appears predictable based on code structure


Runtime: Memory fragmentation, garbage collection pressure, and leak accumulation[15][18]
Dynamic Factors: Actual data sizes, user behavior patterns, and long-running processes[21][24]

Network Capacity

Validation Time: Network calls assumed to work with standard latency


Runtime: Network congestion, timeouts, partial failures, and varying bandwidth[29][32]
Production Reality: Distributed system complexities and service dependencies

OS Capabilities

Validation Time: Assumes ideal OS environment and resource availability


Runtime: Resource contention, scheduling variations, and system-level constraints[40][43]
Dynamic Factors: Multi-tenancy, security policies, and hardware limitations

Data Processing Requirements

Validation Time: Test data is often clean and predictable


Runtime: Real-world data with edge cases, corruption, and unexpected formats[30][42]
Scale Differences: Production volumes can be orders of magnitude larger than test scenarios

Static Analysis vs. Dynamic Analysis


Aspect Static Analysis Dynamic Analysis

Code examined without running[2]


Execution Code analyzed during execution[1][4]
[5]

Compile-time or pre-
Timing Runtime monitoring and analysis[7][12]
deployment[8][11]

1/7
dynamic-analysis-presentation.md 2025-09-06

Aspect Static Analysis Dynamic Analysis

Coverage Entire codebase analyzed[2][5] Only executed paths observed[4][10]

Accuracy May produce false positives[2][7] Higher precision for runtime issues[1][4]

Performance
No runtime overhead[9] Introduces monitoring overhead[3][6]
Impact

Syntax, type safety, code Memory leaks, race conditions,


Issue Types
patterns[25] performance[15][17]

Advantages of Dynamic Analysis


Real-World Issue Detection

Runtime-Only Problems: Memory leaks, race conditions, and performance bottlenecks that only
manifest during execution[1][4]
Actual Environment Testing: Real OS, network, and hardware conditions[27][30]
Production-Like Data: Testing with realistic data volumes and patterns[42]

Precision and Context

No False Positives: Issues detected are real problems that actually occur[6][7]
Environmental Factors: Considers system load, resource availability, and external dependencies[29][32]
Behavioral Analysis: Observes actual program behavior under real conditions[37][38]

Performance Optimization

Bottleneck Identification: Pinpoints actual performance problems during execution[14][18]


Resource Usage Monitoring: Real-time CPU, memory, and I/O analysis[15][21]
Scalability Assessment: Understanding behavior under varying loads[33]

When to Use Dynamic Analysis


Critical Scenarios

1. Performance-Critical Applications: When response time and throughput matter[14][27]


2. Memory-Constrained Environments: Embedded systems, mobile applications[21][26]
3. Concurrent Systems: Multi-threaded applications with potential race conditions[3][6]
4. Production Debugging: Investigating issues that only occur in live environments[32][38]

Specific Use Cases

Memory Leak Detection: Long-running applications showing memory growth[15][18]


Race Condition Analysis: Multi-threaded code with synchronization issues[3][35]
Security Vulnerability Assessment: Runtime exploitation attempts[27][33]
Performance Profiling: Optimizing hot paths and resource usage[14][21]

2/7
dynamic-analysis-presentation.md 2025-09-06

Techniques for Dynamic Analysis


Profiling

CPU Profiling: Identifying performance bottlenecks and hot spots[14][15]


Memory Profiling: Tracking allocation patterns and leak detection[18][21]
I/O Profiling: Network and disk usage analysis[24][29]

Instrumentation

Code Insertion: Adding monitoring probes to track execution[4][37]


Runtime Modification: Dynamic code modification for analysis[38]
Event Tracking: Monitoring system calls and API usage[32]

Monitoring

Real-time Observation: Live system behavior analysis[29][32]


Metrics Collection: Performance and resource usage data gathering[34]
Anomaly Detection: Identifying unusual behavior patterns[29]

Advanced Dynamic Analysis Techniques


Testing for Type Safety

Runtime Type Checking: Validating data types during execution[17][20][23]


Input Validation: Ensuring data integrity at runtime boundaries[17][25]
Contract Enforcement: Verifying preconditions and postconditions[23]

Dynamic Slicing

Execution Path Analysis: Tracking variable dependencies during runtime[16][19][22]


Debugging Focus: Reducing search space for fault localization[16][19]
Behavioral Understanding: Understanding actual program execution flow[22]

Memory Analysis

Heap Profiling: Analyzing object allocation and retention[15][18][21][24][26]


Leak Detection: Identifying unreleased memory resources[15][18]
Fragmentation Analysis: Understanding memory layout efficiency[21][24]

Race Detection

Happens-Before Analysis: Detecting concurrent access violations[3][6]


Lockset Analysis: Monitoring synchronization patterns[6]
Data Race Identification: Finding unsynchronized shared memory access[3][35]

Implementing Dynamic Analysis


On-Premise Deployment
3/7
dynamic-analysis-presentation.md 2025-09-06

# Example: Setting up Valgrind for memory analysis


sudo apt-get install valgrind
valgrind --tool=memcheck --leak-check=full ./your-application

# Java heap analysis


java -XX:+HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError -XX:HeapDumpPath=/tmp/heapdump.hprof YourApp

Cloud Deployment

# Kubernetes deployment with monitoring


apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: app-with-monitoring
spec:
template:
spec:
containers:
- name: app
image: your-app:latest
env:
- name: PROFILING_ENABLED
value: "true"
- name: profiler
image: profiler-agent:latest
volumeMounts:
- name: shared-data
mountPath: /profiling-data

Tool Integration Examples

# Python memory profiling example


import psutil
import time

def monitor_memory():
process = psutil.Process()
while True:
memory_info = process.memory_info()
print(f"RSS: {memory_info.rss / 1024 / 1024:.2f} MB")
time.sleep(1)

# Start monitoring in separate thread


import threading
threading.Thread(target=monitor_memory, daemon=True).start()

4/7
dynamic-analysis-presentation.md 2025-09-06

Practical Demo Scenarios


Demo 1: Memory Leak Detection

Setup: Java application with gradual memory leak

// Problematic code causing memory leak


public class MemoryLeakDemo {
private static List<String> cache = new ArrayList<>();

public void processData(String data) {


cache.add(data); // Never removed!
// Process data...
}
}

Analysis Tools:

On-premise: JProfiler, VisualVM, Eclipse MAT[15][18][26]


Cloud: New Relic, AppDynamics, DataDog APM[28]

Demo 2: Race Condition Detection

Setup: Multi-threaded counter with race condition

public class RaceConditionDemo {


private int counter = 0;

public void increment() {


counter++; // Not thread-safe!
}

public int getCounter() {


return counter;
}
}

Analysis Tools:

Detection: ThreadSanitizer, Intel Inspector[3][35]


Monitoring: Custom race detection with happens-before analysis[6]

Demo 3: Performance Bottleneck Analysis

Setup: Database-heavy application with N+1 query problem

# Problematic code with N+1 queries


def get_user_posts():

5/7
dynamic-analysis-presentation.md 2025-09-06

users = User.objects.all() # 1 query


for user in users:
posts = user.posts.all() # N queries!
print(f"{user.name}: {len(posts)} posts")

Analysis Tools:

Profiling: cProfile, py-spy, Django Debug Toolbar[14]


Database: Query analyzers, slow query logs[28]

Tool Recommendations by Environment


On-Premise Solutions

Tool Category Recommended Tools Use Cases

Memory Analysis Valgrind, AddressSanitizer, JProfiler[15][18] Memory leaks, buffer overflows

Performance Profiling Perf, Intel VTune, YourKit[14][15] CPU bottlenecks, optimization

Race Detection ThreadSanitizer, Intel Inspector[3][35] Concurrency issues

General Purpose GDB, LLDB, Visual Studio Debugger[38] Runtime debugging

Cloud-Native Solutions

Tool Category Recommended Tools Use Cases

APM Platforms New Relic, DataDog, AppDynamics[28] Full-stack monitoring

Container Monitoring Prometheus + Grafana, Jaeger[28] Microservices analysis

Log Analysis ELK Stack, Splunk[28] Behavioral analysis

Synthetic Testing Pingdom, Catchpoint[33] Performance validation

Implementation Best Practices


Development Integration

1. CI/CD Pipeline Integration: Automated performance regression detection[27][36]


2. Gradual Rollout: Start with non-critical systems for tool validation
3. Baseline Establishment: Create performance and behavior baselines before optimization

Production Deployment

1. Minimal Overhead: Choose tools with <5% performance impact[3][27]


2. Sampling Strategies: Use statistical sampling for large-scale analysis[3]
3. Alert Configuration: Set up meaningful thresholds and notifications[32]

Team Adoption
6/7
dynamic-analysis-presentation.md 2025-09-06

1. Training Programs: Ensure team understands tool capabilities and limitations


2. Process Integration: Incorporate analysis into regular development workflow
3. Knowledge Sharing: Regular sessions on findings and optimization techniques

Hybrid Approaches: Best of Both Worlds


Complementary Usage

Static Analysis First: Catch obvious issues early in development[2][8]


Dynamic Analysis for Validation: Verify real-world behavior and performance[1][4]
Continuous Integration: Both approaches in automated pipelines[27][36]

Tool Chaining Examples

# Example workflow combining static and dynamic analysis


# Step 1: Static analysis
sonar-scanner -Dsonar.projectKey=myproject

# Step 2: Build and test


mvn clean test

# Step 3: Dynamic analysis during integration testing


java -javaagent:profiler.jar -jar application.jar &
./integration-tests.sh
kill $!

# Step 4: Performance baseline validation


./performance-tests.sh --baseline-check

Key Takeaways for Implementation


1. Start Small: Begin with one or two critical applications
2. Measure Impact: Monitor the overhead of analysis tools themselves
3. Automate Everything: Integrate analysis into existing workflows
4. Act on Results: Establish processes for addressing identified issues
5. Continuous Improvement: Regularly review and update analysis strategies

Questions for Discussion

Which runtime issues are most critical in your current systems?


How can we balance analysis overhead with production performance requirements?
What integration points exist in your current CI/CD pipeline for dynamic analysis?

This presentation provides practical guidance for implementing dynamic analysis in both on-premise and cloud
environments, focusing on real-world applicability for experienced software engineering teams.

7/7

You might also like