1
Exploring the Meaning of Global Development Reflection
My experience so far with Global Development Studies can be summarized with three
concepts: the erasure of history, the consequences of colonialism, and framing. The erasure of
history refers to the deliberate and selective destruction of culture and history, often motivated by
religious or political reasons (Arnold, 2014, 2441). Not only does this downplay the experiences
and contributions of marginalized groups, it warps how we perceive the world today. For
instance, this distortion is demonstrated by how the Japanese government tries to cover up its
war crimes, like the Nanjing Massacre and comfort women. As stated by Akira Kawasaki
(2022), “The government of Japan has systematically erased the description of Japan's brutal and
criminal acts to its neighbors in the lead-up to and during WWII in history textbooks.” Their
efforts seem to be successful, as most of the Japanese population remain unaware of the horrors
of the past and the reasons behind the tension between Japan and its neighbouring countries
(Global Times, 2022). As a result, it leads to an over-glorification of Japan's history, which
hinders the chance that the remaining survivors will ever get any sort of compensation or
acknowledgement.
The consequences of colonialism are wide-ranging, touching the political, social, and
economic systems of colonized societies long after colonial rule ended. More specifically,
colonialism introduced capitalist ideologies to colonized countries, which transformed local
economies and ways of life to serve the needs of the colonizers. For example, in British-ruled
India, traditional agricultural practices focused on diverse, subsistence farming were
systematically replaced with the cultivation of cash crops like cotton, indigo, and tea for export
to British markets (Sreevatsan, 2018). This shift prioritized profits for the empire, making India
more competitive in global trade, but it came at the expense of local food security and rural
2
livelihoods (Sreevatsan, 2018). The long-term impact was severe, as dependence on cash crops
and global market fluctuations destabilized India’s economy, contributing to food shortages and
famines that had lasting effects on the population (Sreevatsan, 2018). This economic
restructuring under colonialism fundamentally left a legacy of inequality and economic
vulnerability.
Framing plays a critical role in how history, global development, and social issues are
understood and addressed. The way events and narratives are framed shapes public perception,
influencing both societal attitudes and policy decisions. Looking at the poverty pandemic,
society seems to underestimate the severity of the problem because fewer people are living under
the international poverty line. In Thailand, 0% of the population live below the line, but 10%
under the national poverty line (Onarheim & Gopinathan, 2020). Similarly, the international
poverty rates of 19% in South Africa and 22% in Mexico hide the national rates of 55% and
42%, respectively (Onarheim & Gopinathan, 2020). This discrepancy is a result of the poverty
line being universalized to one idea of poverty. Besides the fact that US$2.15 is an extremely low
and unrealistic threshold for many, it does not take into account the cost of living for each
individual country. Someone living in Thailand could have a full meal for US$2.15, while
someone in Canada would struggle to even buy bread. Additionally, poverty is framed as simply
a lack of money, rather than a systematic cycle of struggle, which causes us to focus on
short-term economic fixes rather than addressing the deeper, structural issues like access to
education, healthcare, and opportunities for upward mobility that perpetuate cycles of poverty.
Reflecting on these concepts, I have seen firsthand how they play out in my community.
For instance, the history and culture of Indigenous peoples in Canada was only briefly touched
upon, despite Indigenous identities being discussed throughout elementary and high school. I
3
found that it was especially lacking in the Indigenous English course that was being offered at
my high school.While I acknowledge the thought behind the course, it failed to "engage
responsibly with these text forms, as well as to follow appropriate cultural protocols to ensure
respect for First Nations, Métis, and Inuit cultures" and to fully provide students the opportunity
to "explore texts emerging from and/or related to diverse Indigenous cultures" (English:
Understanding Contemporary First Nations, Métis, and Inuit Voices, 2019). Personally, I would
have loved to learn about the cultural practices, the celebrations, and read the stories that they
have passed down for centuries. While I agree it is important to learn about how colonialism has
impacted Indigenous Peoples, it is only one part of history and does not encompass the thousands
of years of their story. As harsh as it sounds, the focus on colonial trauma and victimization
robbed us of the opportunity to experience Indigenous culture, effectively erasing it from our
classrooms. This lack of focus on cultural continuity and Indigenous resilience also does little to
diversify our understanding of history. Even though we are learning about Indigenous history, it
often feels like the narrative is still centered on European perspectives, making the curriculum
feel repetitive and narrow.
In a way, we are still erasing Indigenous history, and the fact that it is going unnoticed is
one of the consequences of colonialism. In the classroom, there seemed to be a greater emphasis
on achieving high marks rather than fostering a genuine understanding of Indigenous culture and
perspectives. Students were more focused on checking off boxes, meeting the criteria for
assignments, and ensuring high marks to satisfy university admissions’ officers, rather than
appreciating, let alone questioning, the material. This fostered a competitive environment where
grades were prioritized over learning, an attitude that is rooted in colonial and capitalist
4
ideologies. In this system, knowledge becomes something to consume, package, and produce for
grades, rather than something to be shared, respected, and understood.
In addition to land and people, colonialism seems to conquer our minds as well. Within
that environment, I feel it left a one-dimensional narrative of First Nations, Metis, and Inuit
(FNMI) identities. While I am not denying that millions of Indigenous Peoples were victims, that
is, again, only one part of their stories. It framed FNMI cultures as primarily defined by suffering
and loss, portraying them as passive victims of colonialism. In reality, Indigenous peoples are
rich, dynamic, and resilient, rooted in centuries of traditions, knowledge systems, and
community strength. I want to hear about the resilience of Indigenous peoples and how they
managed to protect their identity despite the massacre. Their accomplishments in the face of
adversity should be highlighted as central to their story, not just their trauma. For instance, I had
only recently heard about Traditional Ecological Knowledge and their contributions to ecological
research. They have generations worth of environmental records and a vast amount of
knowledge, ranging from bowhead whale behaviour to sustainable harvesting practices (Popp,
2018). I know that many of my classmates would have found this information worth exploring.
However, they are completely unaware of these opportunities because we were not given the
opportunity to explore them.
With that being said, I feel that my perspective on global development is very limited. I
have not been exposed to the full range of voices, particularly those from Indigenous and
marginalized communities. This realization has deepened my understanding of global
development as not simply fighting for justice, but also as reforming our systems. This gap in our
education system mirrors our tendency to overlook non-Western approaches in development,
leading to one-size-fits-all solutions. These experiences have made me more critical and
5
skeptical of development models because of how easy it was for me and my classmates to fall
victim to the narratives presented to us by the curriculum and by society.
Reflecting upon those experiences, I believe that Global Development Studies is
identifying where systems need to be reformed and finding the most equitable way to go about
reforming them. In stating that, I have come to question if the current solutions, such as the
Indigenous English course, are compatible with how our system is currently structured. Is it
enough to insert solutions to fill the gaps within our society? Or do we need to completely
change the way our society operates in order to rectify the world of its wicked problems? I hope
to have a clearer answer to these questions as I continue to study Global Development.
6
References
Arnold, B. (2014). Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. Springer New York.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_373
English: Understanding Contemporary First Nations, Métis, and Inuit Voices. (2023). English:
Understanding Contemporary First Nations, Métis, and Inuit Voices. Retrieved
September 29, 2024, from
https://www.dcp.edu.gov.on.ca/en/curriculum/secondary-first-nations-metis-and-inuit-stu
dies/courses/nbe3u/introduction
Global Times. (2022, July 6). Japan’s erasure of WWII history education is causing problems:
Japanese peace-promoting activist. Global Times. Retrieved October 3, 2024, from
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202207/1269876.shtml?id=11
Onarheim, K. H., & Gopinathan, U. (2020, August 7). There are two pandemics, but why do we
keep forgetting the underlying one? BMJ Blogs. Retrieved October 5, 2024, from
https://blogs.bmj.com/bmjgh/2020/08/07/there-are-two-pandemics-but-why-do-we-keep-
forgetting-the-underlying-one/
Popp, J. (2018, January 2). How Indigenous knowledge advances modern science and
technology. The Conversation. Retrieved September 30, 2024, from
https://theconversation.com/how-indigenous-knowledge-advances-modern-science-and-t
echnology-89351
Sreevatsan, A. (2018, November 21). British Raj siphoned out $45 trillion from India: Utsa
Patnaik. Mint. Retrieved October 5, 2024, from
7
https://www.livemint.com/Companies/HNZA71LNVNNVXQ1eaIKu6M/British-Raj-siph
oned-out-45-trillion-from-India-Utsa-Patna.html