Problem Statement
Problem Statement
For the formulation of the problem, we must go from the general to the particular, as it starts from
from a question that encompasses a problem that will later be addressed in parts.
In methodological terms, the statement of the problem, which is also usually the
The first chapter of a thesis aims to answer the fundamental question of 'what
investgar?” So the problem statement is what determines, guides and
justify the development of the research process.
From the formulation of the problem and its delimitation, a set arises.
objectives (general and specific) that are sought to be achieved with the research.
Common mistakes
Among the common mistakes that can be made in text writing of
problem description, the following can be mentioned:
company or about their research work. Therefore, in the structure of the text, it
proponen al menos tres párrafos: uno de introducción, otro de la descripción del
the problem itself
Being too extensive and repetitive. The other extreme is also harmful, given
that we can confuse the reader. The idea is for the reader to have clarity about the
situation and therefore the writing must be concrete. Sometimes, it also tends to
to delve into overly technical or theoretical matters: I suggest that this be included.
within the referential framework, the theoretical framework, and even in the methodology.
Final recommendations
Conduct a preliminary investigation into the context and the problematic situation. If
This is a research study, and it is necessary to read background information (other similar works).
If you still don't know how to start, write a draft where you jot down some ideas.
related to the three aspects mentioned above: context (introduction),
problem and its derivatives, and purpose of the work.
Use connectors to give fluency to your text and make it not boring to read. Here
I found a list that may be useful to you, not only for writing the problem,
but also for the rest of the [Link])
delimited in terms of space, time, and population (if applicable). (Fidias G. Arias,
2006
This formulation is also called the main problem, from which the ...
general objective and the central hypothesis, in this framework.
There are two ways to state the research problem, and these are: the interrogative.
and the declarative (Tamayo and Tamayo, 2004). For their part, Corona, Fonseca, and Corona
In an interrogative form
The formulation of the research problem is carried out through a question. The
the easiest and most direct way to formulate a problem is through a question, which
identify the difficulties in developing the topic, proposing hypotheses or formulating
unknowns; which will be addressed later in the development of the work
academic.
When writing a question, the researcher knows exactly the type of answer they want.
must seek; leading him to a correct reflection on the subject.
Example 2: How does high employee turnover affect the productivity of the company?
Fine Furniture S.A.C. from the city of Arequipa, 2019?
Example 3: What are the factors that influence the motivation of the sales staff?
from the company Jugos del Norte S.A. during the period of 2018 and 2019?
In declarative form
The formulation of the problem can also be done in a declarative or affirmative manner.
Let's look at the following examples:
Example 1: Determination of the impact of satisfaction on customer loyalty in
Chinese food restaurants in Metropolitan Lima, 2019.
Example 2: Determination of the factors that influence the motivation of the staff
sales of the company Jugos del Norte S.A. during the period of 2018 and 2019.
Lack expressions that imply value judgments: good, bad, better, etc.
Do not provide answers such as YES or NO
Being limited in terms of time, space, and population.
Depending on the type of exploratory, correlational, experimental, or other study, one ...
One time
that you have
identified the type of key question that you will use, then you develop the
formulation of the problem considering each element of the research question.
Just like the following example:
Here I present a method for formulating the problem, and a way to
to make the research question for a correlational study; however, there are
many ways to do it.
It is expressed in the form of a question: This criterion is very much debated so far.
Meanwhile, there is the other alternative called 'declarative', that is, without signs of
interrogation. The interrogative is recommended, as it has the advantage of being simple and
Direct. The questions invite responses and psychologically help to focus the
Attention to the data type that needs to be obtained to determine the response.
It should allow for the empirical testing of the variables: Understanding that the purpose
The fundamental aspect of any research is to seek an answer or solution to a problem, it is
You must specify the target population that will be investigated: Define from the first.
the other phases of the research process determine the limits and the scope of the
study, allow to define the stages required for the study and locate the study within
from a general context.
It is recommended that the objective should be sufficiently specific, the same that
will allow to prioritize according to complexity and degree of breadth.
For the formulation of the objectives, the criteria are considered:
They should be directed at the basic elements of the problem.
They must be measurable and observable
They must follow a methodological and/or logical order.
They must be expressed in infinitive verbs. The use of verbs must indicate action.
that allow for its verification.
They are written with an infinitive verb, those that end in ar, er, ir oriented to the
search for a newknowledgeThey include thevariablesstudy objects that will be
measured Contain an achievement, the study event, the units of study Contain the
place and thettime.
TYPES OF OBJECTIVES
directly with the formulation of the problem. Example: Determine the incidence of being
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES Indicate the steps that must be taken to achieve the
general objective. They derive from the general objective and contribute to its achievement. The
Specific objectives are the answers to the question: How will we achieve the objective?
general?
The general objective defines where we want to go. What for?changethe objects
specific define thestrategiesto achieve the general objective. How?
From Sabino's (1986) perspective, the delimitation should be carried out in terms of time.
and the space, to place our problem in a defined and homogeneous context[1]. From
In such a way, delimiting a research means specifying in concrete terms.
our areas of interest in the search, establish their scope and decide the boundaries of
space, time, and circumstances that we will impose on our study. To the extent that
that the phenomenon under study is clearly formulated and delineated will be favored
possibilities for the researcher not to get lost in the research. It is easier to work in
specific situations that are general.
Indeed, the delimitation must establish the boundaries of the research in terms
of space, time, universe and content. According to the details:
a. Spatial Delimitation: refers to the geographical and/or spatial area where it will take place.
PRESENTATION
The delimitation of the problem is "the cut" that is made of the topic to be investigated, within
the limits of space, time, and theme that characterize the object of
knowledge. It is often accompanied by a contextual framework, which in the case of
The professional residency or thesis is the technological characterization of the
company. It is followed by a 'diagnosis' that describes the problem, supported by
objective and relevant information, for a forecast or identification of the situation
future when the current situation is sustained, and the presentation of alternatives to overcome it
current situation (control over the forecast). In the content of the problem statement
The limits of the research are established in terms of space, time, and universe.
In the problematization, the critical phases that generate problems have been identified.
quality, scrap, costs, technical, others.
Now focus on that or those problems. Describe their complexity and their costs. In the
problem delimitation must cite each of the resources and processes that
they intervene within the project area, to analyze each of them and select
those who intervene within the identified problem.
The objective of defining the problem is to reduce the level of complexity of the problem.
to focus on the essential elements.
The problem statement is the clear and precise delimitation of the object of
research, its main function is to show the researcher the viability in terms of
resources and available time.
Along with this delimitation, it is necessary to justify it; that is, to indicate the
characteristics that lead the researcher to choose the topic to develop, which
they must be of external order or objective, and of internal order or subjective.
The justification
As we already discussed, it is developed after having a clear understanding of the situation at hand.
study and its implications, never before because it will be very difficult to sell or offer to others
The topic of our work also has repercussions on other similar ones already
carried out or what will be carried out in the future, so it is mandatory to explain which area of the
We cannot forget to clarify in the speech on this point the feasibility of carrying out
the project, that is to say, to show that it is feasible and the material, human resources and
economic reasons that support such a statement. In this regard, Giménez (2008) in the Process of
(...) "even when the project is very important and its execution is highly useful for the
the results obtained are nothing but the real feasibility of carrying it out
will determine its approval or not” pages 35-36.
Other aspects that must be specified in a justification are social relevance, its
theoretical contributions and their applicability in solving a practical problem.
For his part, Castllo (2004) in the book Guide for Project Formulation
Research points to another element to consider in the development of the investigation.
as it is to specify how the project or work is articulated to the policies,
plans and programs of the national, regional, or municipal government, depending on the
established geographical limitation.
Even research can be in tune with policies, objectives and
international organizations such as UNESCO” (…) page 5. The author continues by adding
that what is new is also an element to highlight just like the causes or reasons
that would argue the request for a loan before a banking or financial entity.
because any subject or object of study, if its scope and repercussions are well outlined
benefits will become important and there will be plenty of arguments to support it
development or execution.
Ideally, a maximum of one written page should be reached and respond to the
the following questions:
In that sense, it should be taken into account that the justification is the 'sale' of the project and
from the researcher's capacity, it offers the opportunity to generate benefits from
the results of said project, if the justification is sufficiently convincing, the
project can obtain help and funding sources to not be left behind
only in something written on paper, as it is an academic requirement or an idea
latent.
To finalize and accommodate the attempt to put it into practice, it is a very good idea.
highlight the benefits based on compliance deadlines, emphasize benefits to
short-term benefits, medium-term benefits, and finally long-term benefits.
Explain the reasons why research should be conducted and the benefits it provides.
can contribute the generated knowledge is something that should not only be done
students designing their thesis project in higher education; but rather the
Justification of the research must also be presented by the academic staff.
university, the consultant/advisor in research, among others (Hernández, Fernández and
Baptsta, 2010, p. 39.
that before starting any research, it is important to create aState of the Cueton,
which allows you to learn what has been researched on the topic that you
It's also of interest, and it can provide you with specific information that can help you for
5. If you have any doubt about a point or data, you can consult experts on the
area; those who can help you clarify ideas, or recommend sources
bibliographic sources that you can consult.
The problem statement is the initial phase of any research process and therefore
it is essential that this is appropriate, otherwise it will be very difficult to carry out a
good research.
The importance of problem formulation lies in the fact that throughout the entire process of
The research will seek to provide an answer to it, that is, only if it is achieved to be specific.
a solution can be provided.
For a good problem statement to exist, the following must be taken into account:
Empirical test.
Data collection.
It is necessary that everything described is taken into account, otherwise the accomplishment of our
the research process will become more difficult, in addition to which Russell Ackoff states that 'a problem
It is certain that your research will have some limitations and that is normal. However, it is
It is very important that you strive to minimize the scope of the limitations on
length of the research process.
It's always better to identify and recognize the deficiencies in your work, rather than leaving
that your thesis evaluator points them out to you.
While discussing the limitations of your research, do not just provide the list.
and description of the deficiencies in their work. It is also important that you explain
how these limitations have impacted its findings.
Your research may have multiple limitations, but you need to discuss only
those limitations that are directly related to your problems of
research.
For example, if the completion of ameta-analysisthe secondary data has not been
established as its research objective, it is not necessary to mention it as
research limitation.
It is possible that I have formulated research goals and objectives in a way that is too
broadens. It is possible to specify how the formulation could be reduced.
goals and objectives of the research, in such a way that the level can be increased
study approach.
3. Sample size.
If the sample size is too small, the statistical tests could not
identify significant relationships within the dataset.
You could say that basing your study on a larger sample size could have
generated more accurate results. The importance of the sample size is greater
in quantitative studies than in qualitative ones.
4. Lack of prior studies in the research area.
However, there may be little or no prior research on your topic if it has been
focused on the most contemporary and evolving research problem or on a
too narrow research problem.
For example, if you have chosen to explore the role of Bitcoins as the currency of the future, it is
Possible that I cannot find tons of academic documents that address the
research problem, because Bitcoin is only a recent phenomenon.
You can discuss certain points of your research limitations such as the
suggestion for further research in the conclusions chapter of your thesis.
LIMITATIONS OF THE RESEARCH PROBLEM
It refers to limitations regarding the problems that the researcher will encounter during.
the process of his investigation. In that sense, from Ávila's perspective (2001, 87),
a limitation consists in that a particular aspect of the problem is neglected due to
any reason. This means that every limitation must be justified by a
good reason.
The most important limitation could be the fidelity and accuracy of the data, due to being
of a job with a very important subjective component. Another limitation the
constitutes the sample size to be taken in adult services and
pediatrics, which will not allow generalizing the results to be obtained.
It is important to note that it should not be confused with the limitations of the researcher with
limitations of the research. The researcher does not have financial resources or
time, since this is not a limitation of the research. Instead, it refers to the limits
or borders as far as the aspirations of research reach, always by
reference for the objectives.
Consequently, the limitations come to constitute external factors to the team.
researchers who become obstacles that could eventually
to present themselves during the development of the study and escape the control of the researcher
the same. In other words, a limiting factor in a research is any that is capable
to influence the quality of the study.