0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views44 pages

Module 2 Osd

The document outlines a structured approach to organizational design and planning, detailing stages from analyzing the organizational situation through SWOT analysis and scenario planning, to defining organizational purpose and selecting strategies. It emphasizes the importance of strategic intent, operating goals, and the impact of competitive strategies on organizational design. Additionally, it discusses methods for assessing organizational effectiveness, including goal, resource-based, internal process, and strategic constituents approaches.

Uploaded by

ashutosh singh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views44 pages

Module 2 Osd

The document outlines a structured approach to organizational design and planning, detailing stages from analyzing the organizational situation through SWOT analysis and scenario planning, to defining organizational purpose and selecting strategies. It emphasizes the importance of strategic intent, operating goals, and the impact of competitive strategies on organizational design. Additionally, it discusses methods for assessing organizational effectiveness, including goal, resource-based, internal process, and strategic constituents approaches.

Uploaded by

ashutosh singh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Organizational Purpose & Module 2

Structural Design Organizational Design & Planning


Stage 1: Analysis of the Organizational
Situation

SWOT ANALYSIS SCENARIO PLANNING


Stage 2: Defining Organisational Purpose

Strategic Intent

Operating Goals

Addressing Goal Conflicts


Stage 3: Selecting Strategy & Design

Contigency
Potter’s
Miles & Snow’s Factors affecting
Competitive
Strategy Typology Organisational
Strategies
Design
Stage 4: Assessing the Organizational
Effectiveness

Goal Approach Resource-Based Internal Process Strategic Constituents


Approach Approach Approach
Satge 1: Role of Strategic
Direction in Organization Design

• Organisational goal
• A desired state of affairs that the organisation
attempts to reach.
• A goal represents a result or end point toward
which organisational efforts are directed.
• The primary responsibility of top management is to
determine an organisation’s goals, strategy, and
design, thereby adapting the organisation to a
changing environment.
• How to finalize the organisational Goal?
• SWOT Analysis
• Scenario Planning
• Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats from
External & Internal Environment
• External Environment
• opportunities and threats in the external environment,
including the amount of change, uncertainty, and
resource availability
• Data Sources: customers, government reports,
professional journals, suppliers, bankers, friends in
1.1. SWOT other organizations, consultants, and association
meetings
Analysis • Internal Environment
• Internal strengths and weaknesses to define the
company’s distinctive competence compared with
other firms in the industry.
• Data Sources: company budgets, financial ratios, profit
and loss statements, and surveys of employee
attitudes and satisfaction
• Looking at current trends and discontinuities and
visualizing future possibilities

1.2. Scenario • Rather than looking only at history and thinking about
what has been, managers think about what could be.
Planning • Typically, two to five scenarios are developed for each set
of factors, ranging from the most optimistic to the most
pessimistic view.
Stage 2: Defining Organisational Purpose

Strategic Intent

Operating Goals

Addressing Goal Conflicts


All organizations exists for a purpose
• Strategic Intent
• Means that all the organization’s energies and resources are directed
2.1. toward a focused, unifying, and compelling overall goal
• Microsoft- Put a computer on every desk in every home
Strategic • Coca Cola- To put a coke within arm’s reach of every consumer in the
world
Intent • Has three aspects à Mission, Core Competence & Competitive
Advantage
2.1.1. Mission
• The overall goal for an organization àthe
organization’s reason for existence.

• Describes the organization’s shared values and


beliefs and its reason for being.

• Official goals à refers to the formally stated


definition of business scope and outcomes the
organization is trying to achieve.

• Defines business operations and may focus on


values, markets, and customers that
distinguish the organization.
• Mission statement
• The organization’s general statement of its purpose and philosophy is often written down
in a policy manual or the annual report.

• Vision
• Where does the organisation wants to reach by completing the end goals

• Need for Mission


• Communicates to current and prospective employees, customers, investors, suppliers,
and competitors what the organization stands for and what it is trying to achieve.
• Communicates legitimacy to internal and external stakeholders who may join and be
committed to the organization because they identify with its stated purpose and values.
2.1.2. Competitive Advantage

• The overall aim of strategic intent à help the organization achieve a sustainable competitive
advantage.

• Competitive advantage à Refers to what sets the organization apart from others and provides
it with a distinctive edge for meeting customer or client needs in the marketplace.

• Managers need to continuously analyse competitors and the internal and external
environments à to find potential competitive openings

• Competitive openings might be thought of as spaces that a company can potentially fill.

• Once competitive openings are identified, use it to create an advantage

• Might include readjusting the structure, goals, or learning new capabilities the organization
needs to gain the upper hand against other companies in the industry.
[Link] Competence.

• A company’s core competence is something the


organization does especially well in comparison
to its competitors.
• A core competence may be in the area of
superior research and development, expert
technological know-how, process efficiency, or
exceptional customer service.
• Apple à superior design and marketing skills.19
In each case, managers identified what their
company does especially well and built the
strategy around it.
2.2. Operating Goals

• The organization’s mission and overall goals provide a basis


for developing more specific operating goals.
• Operating goals
• designates the ends sought through the actual
operating procedures of the organization and explain
what the organization is actually trying to do.
• Features
• Operating goals describe specific measurable outcomes
• Are often concerned with the short run.
• Operating goals typically pertain to the primary tasks
an organization must perform.
• Overall Performance
• Often defined in terms of profitability
• Expressed in terms of net income, earnings per share, or
return on investment.
• Growth à increases in sales or profits over time

Types of • Volume à total sales or the number of products or


services delivered.
Organisational • Resources.
• Pertain to the acquisition of needed material and
Goals financial resources from the environment.
• They may involve obtaining financing for the construction
of new plants, finding less expensive sources for raw
materials, or hiring top-quality technology graduates.
• Eg: Starbucks & Tata Group à premium Arabica coffee
beans
• Eg: Walmart à hire every veteran who wants a job,
provided the person left the military in the previous year
and did not have a dishonorable discharge.
• Market
• Relates to the market share or market standing desired
by the organization.
• Market goals are largely the responsibility of
marketing, sales, and advertising departments.
Types of • Employee Development

Organisational • Pertains to the training, promotion, safety, and growth


of employees.
Goals • It includes both managers and workers.
• Productivity.
• Amount of output achieved from available resources.
• The amount of resource inputs required to reach
desired
• Stated in terms of “cost for a unit of production,”
“units produced per employee,” or “resource cost per
employee.”
Types of Organisational
Goals

• Innovation and Change


• Pertain to internal flexibility and
readiness to adapt to rapid changes
in the environment.
• Often defined with respect to the
development of specific new
services, products, or production
pro-cesses.
Goal Conflict
• This happens when many goals are simultaneously
persued to accomplish an overall mission.
• Employee development goals might conflict with
productivity goals; goals for innovation might hurt
profitability.
• Eg: Facebook à goals of protecting user privacy and
personal data have long been in conflict with goals of
growth and increased advertising revenue.
Stage 3: Selecting Strategy & Design

Contigency
Potter’s
Miles & Snow’s Factors affecting
Competitive
Strategy Typology Organisational
Strategies
Design
Two Frameworks for Selecting Strategy
and Design

• Strategy & Design is selected


• to support and accomplish the organization’s strategic intent, and
• To keep people focused in the direction determined by organizational mission, vision, and operating
goals,
• that can help the organization achieve its purpose and goals within its competitive environment.
• Strategy
• A plan for interacting with the competitive environment to achieve organizational goals.
• While goals define where the organization wants to go and strategies define how it will get there.
• Two models for formulating strategies are the Porter model of competitive strategies and the Miles
and Snow strategy typology.
Porter’s Competitive Strategies
• Michael E. Porter studied a number of business organizations
• Proposed that managers can make the organization more profitable and less vulnerable by adopting either a
differentiation strategy or a low-cost leadership strategy.
• Differentiation.
• With a differentiation strategy, the organisation attempts to distinguish its products or services from others
in the industry.
• Managers may use advertising, distinctive product features, exceptional service, or new technology to
achieve a product perceived as unique.
• This strategy usually targets customers who are not particularly concerned with price, so it can be quite
profitable.
• A differentiation strategy can reduce rivalry with competitors and fight off the threat of substitute products
because customers are loyal to the company’s brand.
• Successful differentiation strategies require a number of costly activities, such as product research and
design and extensive advertising.
• Companies that pursue a differentiation strategy need strong marketing abilities and creative employees who
are given the time and resources to seek innovations. One good illustration of a company that benefits
• Low-Cost Leadership.
• The low-cost leadership strategy tries to
increase market share by keeping costs low
compared to competitors.
• The organization aggressively seeks efficient
facilities, pursues cost reductions, and uses
tight controls to produce products or
services more efficiently than its
competitors.
• The low-cost leadership strategy is
concerned primarily with stability rather
than taking risks or seeking new
opportunities for innovation and growth.
• A low- cost leadership position means a
company can achieve higher profits than
competitors because of its efficiency and
lower operating costs.
Miles and Snow’s
Strategy Typology
• Developed from the study of business strategies by
Raymond Miles and Charles Snow.
• Managers seek to formulate strategies that will be
congruent with the external environment.
• Organisations strive for a fit among internal
organisation characteristics, strategy, and the
external environment.
• There are four strategies that organisations adopt
to be congruent with the external environment.
Strategy types (as per Miles & Snow’s Typology)

• Prospector
• To innovate, take risks, seek out new opportunities, and grow.
• Best suited to a dynamic, growing environment, where creativity to separate the
organization from competitors is more important than efficiency.
• Eg: Nike
• Keeps introducing a new line of shoes (even designs that can be produced using
recycled materials and limited amounts of toxic chemical-based glues)
• Eg; Cadillac division of General Motors.
• Enclosed cabin, Electric starter, Thermostatically regulated heating, ventilation and
air conditioning system, invented magnetic ride control, and was the first to
integrate a global positioning satellite (GPS) system.
Strategy types (as per Miles & Snow’s Typology)

• Defender.
• Concerned with stability or even retrenchment (opposite of the prospector)
• Less interest in taking risks and seeking out new opportunities.
• This strategy seeks to hold on to current customers, but it neither innovates nor seeks
to grow.
• Concerned primarily with internal efficiency and control to produce reliable, high-
quality products for steady customers.
• Best when the organization exists in a declining industry or a stable environment.
• Eg: Paramount Pictures
• Turns out a steady stream of reliable hits but few blockbusters à doesn't move to
variety of movies
• Started in 1916 à still sticking to movies only
Strategy types (as per Miles & Snow’s
Typology)

• Analyzer
• Tries to maintain a stable business while innovating on the periphery.
• Midway between the prospector and the defender.
• Some products à targeted at stable environments in which an efficiency strategy designed
to keep current customers
• Other products à Targeting new, more dynamic environments, where growth is possible.
• Eg: Amazon
• Defend its core business of selling books and other physical goods over the Internet ||
also building other businesses à music and video streaming even space exploration
Strategy types (as per Miles & Snow’s
Typology)

• Reactor.
• Respond to environmental threats and opportunities in an ad hoc fashion.
• Top management has not defined a long-range plan or given the organization an
explicit mission or goal, so the organization takes whatever actions seem to meet
immediate needs.
How do Strategies Affect Organization
Design?
• Low Cost Strategy
• Mechanistic Designs à centralized authority and tight control, standard operating
procedures, and emphasis on efficient procurement and distribution systems.
• Employees generally perform routine tasks under close supervision and control and are not
empowered to make decisions or take action on their own.

• Differentiation strategy
• Organic Designs à Requires that employees be constantly experimenting and learning.
• Structure is fluid and flexible, with strong horizontal coordination.
Contingency Factors that effects designing

• Young, small organisations àgenerally informal and have


Size and life little division of labour, few rules and regulations, and ad hoc
budgeting and performance systems.

cycle • Large organizations à extensive division of labour, numerous


rules and regulations, and standard procedures and systems
for budgeting, control, rewards, and innovation

• Design must also fit the workflow technology of the


organization.
Technology • Mass production technology à efficiency, formalisation,
specialization, centralized decision making, and tight control.
• E-business à more informal and flexible.

Corporate • Culture that values teamwork, collaboration, creativity, and


open communication à will not work well with a mechanist
culture system
Ways to measure organizational
Effectiveness

• Goal Approach
• Assessing how well the organisation has attained organisational goals.
• Logical approach because organizations do try to attain certain levels of output, profit, or client
satisfaction.
• Eg: Uber
• Lost license to operate in London (most profitable markets) à toning down its “grow-at- any-cost”
culture, and the company’s goals now include proving to government officials that Uber can comply
with local rules and regulations.
• Indicators of Goal Approach
• Percentage of success of operational goals like profitability, market share, product quality
Ways to measure organizational
Effectiveness

• Resource-Based Approach
• Looks at the input side of the transformation process
• Success is defined as the ability to obtain and manage valued resources
• Defined as the ability of the organisation, in either absolute or relative terms, to obtain scarce and
valued resources and successfully integrate and manage them.
• Indicators.
• Bargaining position à the ability of the organisation to obtain from its environment scarce and valued
resources, including tangible resources such as a prime location, financing, raw materials, and quality
employees, and intangible assets such as a strong brand or superior knowledge
• The ability of the organisation to respond to changes in resource sectors of the environment
Ways to measure organizational
Effectiveness

• Internal Process Approach


• Effectiveness is measured as internal organisational health and efficiency.
• An effective organization has a smooth, well-oiled internal process.
• Employees are happy and satisfied.
• Department activities mesh with one another to ensure high productivity
• Does not consider the external environment..
• Indicators.
• A strong, adaptive corporate culture and positive work climate
• Confidence and trust between employees and management
• Operational efficiency, such as using minimal resources to achieve outcomes
• Undistorted horizontal and vertical communication
• Growth and development of employees
• Coordination among the organization’s parts, with conflicts resolved in the
• The interest of the larger organization
Ways to measure organizational
Effectiveness

• Strategic Constituents Approach


• Stakeholder approach
• Focusing on the satisfaction of key stakeholders, those who are critical to the organization’s ability to survive
and thrive.
• Indicators.
An Integrated Effectiveness Model to assess
Organisational Effectiveness
• Intergrated Effectiveness Model:
• A balance between various parts of the organisation rather than focusing on one part.
• This approach to effectiveness acknowledges that organisations do many things and have many outcomes.
• The model is based on the assumption that there are disagreements and competing viewpoints about what constitutes effectiveness.
• Developed by Robert Quinn and John Rohrbaugh to combine the diverse indicators of performance used by managers and
researchers.

• Indicators.
• Focus à Whether dominant values concern issues that are internal or external to the firm. The internal focus reflects a management
concern for the well-being and efficiency of employees, and the external focus represents an emphasis on the well-being of the
organization itself with respect to the environment.
• Structure à and whether stability or flexibility is the dominant structural consideration. Stability reflects a management value for
efficiency and top-down control, whereas flexibility represents a value for learning and change.
Organizational Effectiveness Quadrants on the basis of focus &
Structure

Open systems emphasis.

• External focus and flexible structure


• The primary goals are growth and resource acquisition.
• The organization accomplishes these goals through the subgoals of flexibility, readiness, and a
positive external evaluation.
• Establishing a good relationship with the environment to acquire resources and grow.

Rational goal emphasis

• Structural control and external focus.


• The primary goals are productivity, efficiency, and profit.
• The organisation wants to achieve output goals in a controlled way.
• Establishing internal planning and goal setting
Internal process emphasis

• Values internal focus and structural control.


• The primary goal is to have a stable organizational setting that maintains itself in an
orderly way.
• The organizations are well established in the environment and simply want to
maintain their current position
• Focus on efficient communication, information management, and decision making.

Human relations emphasis

• values of an internal focus and a flexible structure.


• Primary goal is for the development of human resources.
• Employees are given opportunities for autonomy and development.
• Focus cohesion, morale, and training opportunities. Organizations adopting this
emphasis are more concerned with employees than with the environment.
Millier Machine Parts & Services

150 employees
50,000 sqft
A large chunk of employees to be
retiring
70% market share which is declining
CEO

Marketing Finance HR Manufacturing Communication Issues between


departments
Internal Focus Organisation à
Innovation Employee Wellbeing
Hiring New People
Less Centralization & Hierarchy

You might also like