DEBRE BIRHAN UNIVERSITY

COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND HUMANITIES

DEPARTMENT OF CIVICS AND ETHICAL STUDIES
COURS TITLE—INCLUSIVE EDUCATION
COURS CODE —Incl-4012
SECTION -A
GROUP 6 ASSIGNMENT

NO. NAME. ID.NO.

1. Zebene Shumete. DBUS(p)1207/13
2. Zena Tizazu. DBUS(p)1209/13
3. Zewude. Tarekegn. DBUS(p)1212/13
4. Ayinalem Belayineh. DBUS(p)1213/13
5. Yalew. Alemu. DBUS(p)1214/13
6. Nigusie Tesfaye. DBUS(p)1216/13
7. Demsew. Moges. DBUS(p)1218/13
8. Ayelch. Semu. DBUS(p)1220/13
9. Abera. Teshome. DBUS(p)1221/13
10. Ababu. Ayalew. DBUS(p)1223/13

SUBMITTED D.r.GETAHUN
SUBMISSION DATE 18/12/2017 E.C
DEBRE BIRHAN ETHIOPIA
2017 E.C
 Introduction
Inclusive education (IE) is a transformative approach ensuring equitable access
to quality education for all learners, regardless of physical, cognitive, socio-
economic, or cultural differences. Rooted in human rights principles (e.g., UN
CRPD),
IE challenges traditional exclusionary practices by removing barriers to
participation and fostering belonging. This summary synthesizes core concepts
from the course, highlighting strategies to create classrooms where diversity is
valued as a strength. The urgency of IE in Ethiopia—where 9.3% of the
population lives with disabilities—underscores its role in achieving social
justice and sustainable development.
 Summary
Prompts critical reflection on barriers to inclusion, distinctions between
impairment/disability/handicap, and inclusive teaching strategies. Special
Needs: Children requiring additional support due to physical,
intellectual,emotional,orlearningdifficulties.Impairment:Loss/abnormality in
body structure/function (e.g., blindness, limb loss). Disability: Functional
limitations due to impairment, analyzed through two models: Medical Model:
Focuses on "fixing" the individual. Social Model: Attributes disability to
societal barriers (e.g., discrimination, inaccessible environments). Handicap:
Social disadvantage resulting from impairment/disability (e.g., blindness
limiting access to print without accommodations). Inclusion vs. Integration:
Inclusion: Full participation in mainstream settings. Integration: Placement in
regular schools with support, but not necessarily full participation.

Barriers to Inclusion: Physical:Inaccessible buildings, classrooms, or

equipment. Attitudinal: Stigma, discrimination, low expectations. Policy:
Insufficient teacher training, inadequate resource allocation.
Environmental: Inflexible teachingmethods or classroom setups.
Categories of Special Needs: Eight primary categories, each with unique
characteristics: Sensory Disabilities Visual/hearing impairments. Physical &
Health Impairments Cerebral palsy,asthma, diabetes. Intellectual Disabilities:
IQ < 70–75, deficits in adaptive skills. Learning Disabilities: Dyslexia,
dyscalculia, dysgraphia. Emotional/Behavioral Disorders: Anxiety, aggression,
ADHD. Communication Disorders: Speech/language impairments. Gifted &
Talented: Advanced intellect, creativity. At-Risk Children: Susceptible to
academic failure due to socio-economic/health factors. Developmental
Characteristics: A table
(p.13)compares physical cognitive academic and social/behavioral traits across
the eight categories. Example: Physical Disabilities Motor delays, fatigue.
Learning Disabilities: Average IQ with academic skill
gaps.Gifted&Talented:Advance cognition but social emotional
asynchrony.Introduces foundational concepts of inclusive education,defining
special needs,contrasting disability models,identifying barriers to inclusion, and
categorizing learners’needs with their developmental traits to inform equitable
teaching practices.
Brainstorming Questions Focuses on holistic assessment practices, flexibility in
evaluations, linking assessments to IEPs, overcoming biases, and strengths-
based approaches. Assessment: Systematic process to collect/analyze data on a
child’s abilities, needs, and progress (e.g., diagnosing dyslexia). Multi-Method
Assessment: Combines observations, tests, interviews, and student work
samples (e.g., ADHD evaluation). Multi-Source Information: Integrates input
from teachers,parents, specialists, and the child for a holistic view. Purpose of
Assessment: Identification/Diagnosis: Detect special needs and determine
eligibility for support. Progress Monitoring: Track growth and adjust teaching
strategies. Instructional Planning: Develop IEPs with tailored goals and
accommodations (e.g., assistive tech for visual impairments). Placement
Decisions: Guide inclusive vs. specialized settings. Identifying Children for
Assessment Screening Tests: Flag at-risk children (e.g., hearing screenings).
Teacher Observations: Daily interactions revealing learning/behavior
challenges. Referrals: From parentsorprofessionals(e.g.,doctors). Prioritizes
early intervention for children in poverty or with chronic illness. Methods
ofGatheringInformation:FormalStandardizedtests(e.g.,IQtests,WISC).Informal:
Observations, portfolios, checklists. Collaborative: Data from parents, health
professionals, specialists. Staged Process: Screening → Initial identification →
Ongoing/formative → Summative evaluation. Practical Assessment
Approaches for Teachers: Formativf Quizzes, discussions, real-time feedback.
Summative End-of-unit tests,cumulative projects. Adaptations: Extended time,
oral responses, assistive tech. UDL Strategies Rubrics, performance-based
tasks, peer/self-assessment. Challenges in Inclusive Assessment: Cultural bias,
insufficient teacher training, coordination gaps, and balancing standards with
individual needs. Linking Assessment to IEPs: Assessment data directly
informs IEP goals, accommodations (e.g., extra time), and instructional
strategies. Primary Areas of Assessment: Cognitive/intellectual functioning
Academic achievement Adaptive behavior (daily living/socialskills)
Behavioral/emotional functioning Communication skills Physical/sensory
functioning Developmental/medical history Details systematic, multi-method
assessment strategies to identify and support diverse learners, emphasizing
progress monitoring, IEP development, and overcoming implementation
challenges in inclusive settings. Inclusive Education: Ensures all children,
regardless of abilities or differences, learn together in regular classrooms with
necessary support. Inclusion vs. Integration: Inclusion: Full participation in
mainstreamsettings.Integration:Placement in regular schools with support but
may involve partial segregation. Historical and Theoretical Basis Medical
Modecl:Focuses on diagnosing/labeling disabilities; views disability as
pathology requiring "fixing." Social Model: Emphasizes societal barriers
(attitudinal, physical, policy) as primary obstacles to inclusion.
International Classification of Functioning (ICF): Highlights dynamic
interactions between individuals and environments. Philosophical
Understanding Rooted in equity, dignity, and respect for diversity.
Asserts all students have the right to learn in a shared environment.
Characteristics of Inclusive ClassroomsAccessible environments
(physical/instructional). Flexible teaching methods and curricula (e.g.,
Universal Design for Learning). Collaboration among teachers,specialists,
families, and students. Peer support and social interaction. Implementation
Approaches Whole-school approach Inclusion embedded in school
culture/policies.Collaborative teaching: Teams of general/special educators.
Differentiated instructions: Tailored to individual needs. Assistive technologies
and ongoing teacher training. Critiques of Inclusive Education Resource
constraints (funding, trained staff). Risk of diluted support for severe
disabilities. Teacher preparedness for diverse classrooms. Potential social
isolation if poorly facilitated. Key Elements for Success Removal of barriers to
learning/participation. Recognition of
individualdifferencesasenriching.Stakeholder engagement (students, families,
communities). Continuous evaluation and adaptation. Practical Classroom
Strategies Strategies are tailored to specific special needs categories (e.g.,
sensory, physical, intellectual disabilities):
Sensory Disabilities Braille materials, sign language, FM systems. Physical
Disabilities: Ergonomic seating, assistive tech (e.g., speech-to-text). Intellectual
Disabilities: Simplified instructions, visual schedules. General Strategies:
Flexible grouping, adapted assessments, positive behavior supports. Inclusive
education transforms classrooms into equitable spaces by addressing societal
barriers, leveraging collaborative practices, and adapting to diverse needs.
While challenges exist (resources, training), its core philosophy promotes
dignity, accessibility, and holistic development for all learners.Inclusion is not
just placement
—it’s meaningful participation through systemic support and adaptable
pedagogy. Barriers and Opportunities to Implementing Inclusive Education Key
Challenges and Barriers Country Level: Policy Gaps: Lack of enforceable
laws/frameworks for inclusion. Funding Shortages: Insufficient resources for
infrastructure, materials, and personnel.
Specialist Shortage: Scarcity of trained special education professionals.
Cultural Attitudes: Stigma and low awareness
hinderingpolicyenforcement.Infrastructure Inaccessible buildings, transport, and
learning tools. Weak Coordination: Poor accountability mechanisms across
governance levels. School Level: Resource Deficits Lack of assistive devices,
support staff, and adapted materials. PhysicalInaccessibility:
Classrooms/buildings unfit for mobility/sensory
needs.RigidSystems:Standardized curricula and assessments resisting
modification. Resistance to Change: Negative attitudes among staff/leaders and
low community awareness. Inadequate Teacher Training: Limited preparation
for inclusive pedagogy. Teacher Level: Training Gaps: Insufficient
pre-service/in-service training in inclusive methods. Low Confidence/Attitudes:
Unwillingness or perceived inability to teach diverse learners. Workload
Pressure: Increased demands without added support or time. Fragmented
Expertise: Separation of special/general education training. Child Level Social
Stigma: Bullying, exclusion, and low self-esteem due to societal biases.
Complex Needs: Schools struggling to provide tailored interventions. Late
Identification: Delayed/missed diagnosis reducing early support efficacy.
Emotional/Behavioral Issues: Difficulties in self-regulation and social
participation. Parent/Family Level: Awareness Gaps Unfamiliarity with
inclusive education conceptsorrights.CulturalStigma:Preference for segregated
schooling due to fear of judgment. Limited Collaboration: Poor communication
between schools and families. Economic Constraints Financial hardship
limiting access to resources.
Opportunities of Inclusive Education Equity and Rights Guarantees all children
access to quality education. Social Integration: Fosters peer acceptance, reduces
discrimination, and builds diverse relationships. Academic Improvement:
Differentiated teaching meets varied learning needs effectively. Attitudinal
Shifts Exposure to diversity cultivates empathy and broader societal inclusion.
Holistic Development: Supports cognitive, social, emotional, and physical
growth through collaboration. Policy Momentum: Global frameworks (e.g.,
CRPD) drive national inclusion efforts. Innovation: Universal Design for
Learning (UDL) and assistive technologies enhance adaptability. underscores
that while systemic, attitudinal, and resource barriers impede inclusive
education across multiple levels, proactive strategies can leverage opportunities
to create equitable learning environments. Addressing these challenges requires
coordinated efforts in policy reform, teacher training, community engagement,
and infrastructure development to realize the transformative potential of
inclusion. Inclusive education succeeds when societal and structural barriers
are dismantled, transforming diversity into an asset for holistic
development.Inclusive Curriculum :An inclusive curriculum is designed to
accommodate the diverse needs of allstudents,regardless of abilities, culture,
language, race, gender,
disability,orsocioeconomicstatus.ItIntegratesvariedcontent,perspectives,andasse
ssment methods. Applies Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles to
remove barriers.Valuesdiversityinstudentpopulations and curriculum content.
Aims to build skills for participation in diverse, global environments. Diversity
and Representation: Content reflects multiple
cultural,racial,gender,andabilityperspectiveFlexibilityandAdaptability:Instructio
nalmethodsandassessmentsadjusttolearningstyles(e.g.,visual,kinesthetic).Equityi
nParticipationEnsuresallstudents can engage equitably (e.g., barrier-free
materials).Collaboration: Partnerships among teachers, students, families, and
communities. UD Integration: Multiple means of representation(content
delivery), engagement (motivation), and
expression(demonstratinglearning).InclusivePedagogy: Teaching strategies
prioritize belonging, participation, and achievement for all. Challenges to
Fostering Inclusive CurriculumTeacher Training Gaps: Lack of skills/resources
to adaptmaterials.Systemic Barriers: Rigid curricula, standardized testing, and
inflexible policies. Attitudinal Barriers: Limited commitment to inclusion
principles among educators. Limited Family/Community Engagement: Reduces
holistic support. Balancing Standardized Assessments: Difficulty aligning with
diverse learning outcomes. Integration Challenges: Requires collaboration
between general/special educators. Inclusive Teaching and Learning
Environmen Classroom Culture: Promotes belonging, acceptance, and support.
Flexible Spaces: Adapts to varied abilities and learning styles. Collaborative
Approaches: Group work and student teacher partnerships. Diverse Tools:
Multimedia resources, adapted texts, and
assistive technologies. Continuous Reflection: Educators adapt to evolving
student needs. Positive Attitudes Encourages empathy and respect for diversity.
Family Partnership Advocacy Role: Families champion children’s rights and
inclusion. Collaborative Implementation: Shared responsibility among teachers,
families, students, and community professionals. Active Engagement: Families
participate in curriculum planning, goal setting, and progress monitoring.
Impact: Strengthens support networks and improves educational outcomes. An
inclusive curriculum transforms education by removing barriers and leveraging
diversity through UDL, collaboration, and adaptable practices. Success hinges
on addressing systemic challenges and empowering all stakeholders—especially
families—to
create equitable learning experiences.
Adapting Curriculum and Instruction
This chapter outlines strategies for tailoring curriculum, teaching methods,
assessments, materials, and classroom organization to meet the diverse needs of
learners in inclusive settings.Adapt what students learn based on individual
needs, abilities, interests, and prior knowledge.
Present content in varied formats (visual, auditory, tactile, digital). Allow
flexibility in depth, complexity, and pacing (e.g., curriculum compacting,
scaffolding). Emphasize student strengths and interests to enhance
engagement.Teaching Approach Vary instructional strategies (lectures, hands-
on activities, cooperative learning). Use flexible grouping (individual, pairs,
small groups). Plan lessons with tiered challenges and supports,informedby
formative assessments.Encourage student choice and self-paced progression.
Differentiation of Assessment Methods Offer multiple assessment formats
(projects, oral presentations, portfolios, modified tests). Prioritize formative
assessments for ongoing feedback. Accommodate diverse needs (e.g., extended
time, oral responses, simplified instructions). Promote self-assessment and
reflection. Differentiation of Teaching Materials/Aids Use diverse resources:
multimedia, manipulatives, adapted texts, assistive technologies. Ensure
materials are culturally relevant and accessible (e.g., visual supports, simplified
language).Enhance representation and engagement through multisensory tools.
Differentiation of Classroom Organization Design flexible physical spaces for
varied activities (quiet zones, group workstations). Adjust seating to reduce
distractions, aid accessibility, or foster collaboration. Establish predictable
routines and clear expectations. Utilize learning centers for self-paced
exploration. Cultivate a socially inclusive environment promoting respect and
peer interaction.
Key Principles Flexibility: Adapt content, processes, and environments
dynamically.
Accessibility: Remove barriers through UDL-inspired design. Student Agency:
Empower learners through choice and self-assessment. Collaboration Use
group structures and peer support to reinforce inclusion.This chapter equips
educators to create responsive, equitable classrooms where all learners can
thrive through intentional adaptations.
Definition of IEPA legally required document tailored to meet the unique
educational needs of a child with a disability. Ensures Free Appropriate Public
Education (FAPE) in the Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) Outlines
specific goals, services, accommodations, and progress monitoring methods.
Need for IEP Provides personalized instruction and accommodations based on
the student’s abilities and challenges.Guides educators, families, and support
staff in coordinated service delivery. Ensures accountability through
measurable goals and legal compliance. IEP Formulation Present Levels of
Academic Achievement and Functional Performance (PLAAFP):
Comprehensive assessment of academic, social, behavioral, and physical skills.
Measurable Annual Goals: Address academic/functional areas (e.g.,"Solve
single-digit addition problems with 80% accuracy"). Services and
Supports:Special education services (e.g., small-group instruction), related
services (e.g., speech therapy), and accommodations (e.g.,
extendedtime).Assessment Accommodations: Adjustments for state/district tests
(e.g., quiet room, oral responses). IEP Process Referral: Identification for
special education eligibility.Evaluation:Multidisciplinary assessment of needs.
IEP Meeting: Team collaboration to develop the plan. Parental Consent:
Formal approval of the IEP. Implementation & Monitoring: Ongoing progress
tracking and annual reviews.IEP Team Core Members: Parents, general/special
education teachers, school psychologist, district representative. Additional
Members: Related service providers (e.g., therapists), the student (if
appropriate), and external specialists. Role:Collaborate to set goals, determine
services, and review progress.
Implementing the IEP Deliver services as specified (e.g., specialized instruction
4x/week). Apply accommodations/modifications (e.g., graphic organizers,
assistive tech). Monitor Progress: Regular
data collection (e.g., monthly fluency drills) and family updates. Review
Meetings: Adjust goals/services quarterly or as needed. Sample IEP
Components (Illustrated for a 5th grader with dyscalculia): PLAAFP:Struggles
with basic arithmetic; benefits from visual aids.
Goals:Math fluency targets (e.g., 80% accuracy on addition drills). Services:
Small-group math instruction + visual aids. Accommodations: Extra time, quiet
testing space, oral demonstrations.
Progress Monitoring:** Monthly data reviews and quarterly parent reports.
Key Principles Collaboration:Essential among educators, families, and
specialists.
Legal Compliance: Adherence to FAPE/LRE mandates. Flexibility: IEPs
evolve based on student progress and changing needs. emphasizes that IEPs are
dynamic, student-centered plans requiring
teamwork, data-driven adjustments, and commitment to equitable
education.Disability in the Ethiopian ContextDisability is predominantly
understood through a medical model in Ethiopian legislation, defining PWDs as
individuals unable to perform physical/mental functions due to natural/human-
made causes (excluding conditions like addiction). 7.8 million people (9.3% of
the
population)live with disabilities. Cultural and social barriers (stigma,
lowawareness) hinder inclusion. National Plan of Action for Persons with
Disabilities (2012–2021) aims to promote inclusion but faces implementation
gaps. Legal gaps persist; a draft Ethiopian Disability Act is under preparation to
strengthen rights protection. Education of Children with Disabilities in
Ethiopia Challenges: Physical inaccessibility of schools. Inadequate resources
and trained personnel. Limited practical implementation of inclusive policies
despite supportive frameworks. Policy Efforts: Framework Document (2009):
Includes special needs provisions in Technical and Vocational Education
(TVET). Emphasis on Least Restrictive Environment (LRE), though
infrastructural/systemic barriers persist. Collaboration:
Family/community partnerships are crucial but underdeveloped. National and
International Instruments UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with
Disabilities (CRPD): Ratified in 2010, committing Ethiopia to align laws with
international standards.Key NationalLaws:Proclamation No. 568/2008: Protects
employment rights, mandates reasonable accommodations, and prohibits
discrimination. Building Proclamation No. 624/2009: Requires public buildings
to be accessible. Developmental Social Welfare Policy (1997): Promotes
inclusion and support services.National Plan of Action (2012–2021): Focuses
on education, employment, rehabilitation, and societal participation.
Implementation Issues Inconsistent enforcement perpetuates socioeconomic
disadvantages for PWDs. Ongoing Efforts: NGOs, Disabled Persons’
Organizations (DPOs), and government initiatives advocate for accessibility,
rights awareness, and inclusive education/employment. Medical vs. Social
Model Tension: Legislation focuses on individual impairments rather than
societal barriers.
Policy-Implementation Gap: Strong frameworks exist but struggle with
execution due to resource constraints and cultural attitudes. Advocacy Needs:
Teachers play a critical role in promoting rights awareness and inclusive
practices within systemic challenges.

underscores the urgent need for cohesive enforcement of disability rights,

culturally responsive advocacy, and collaborative efforts to advance inclusion in
Ethto
pia.
Integration of Insights
The eight chapters form a coherent and interconnected narrative on building
an inclusive education system.

The Foundation (Ch. 1 & 3):The journey begins with the "why"—the concepts,
models, and philosophy of inclusion. The shift from the medical to the social
model is the critical lens.

The Evidence Base (Ch. 2):Assessment is the process of gathering evidence to

understand the learner holistically.

The Blueprint (Ch. 7): Assessment data feeds into the IEP, the legal and
practical blueprint for a child's education.

The Implementation (Ch. 5 & 6): The IEP is implemented through the inclusive
curriculum (UDL framework) and differentiated instructi (practical tools).The
Reality Check (Ch. 4 & 8):Woven throughout is awareness of barriers and the
specific Ethiopian context, essential for pragmatic practice.The Golden Thread:
The connector is collaboration. From assessment to IEP development to
teaching, inclusion is a team effort that cannot be done in isolation.

An effective inclusive educator is one who can integrate this knowledge:

understand the social model, use assessment to identify strengths and needs,
collaborate on an IEP, differentiate instruction, and advocate to overcome
barriers within the Ethiopian context.

This integrated approach moves inclusion from an abstract ideal to a concrete,

actionable framework for daily teaching practice, empowering teachers as key
agents of change.

The chapters interlink to form a cohesive IE framework:

- Assessment (Ch 2) informs IEP development (Ch 7) and curriculum
adaptations (Ch 6).
- Barriers (Ch 4) highlight the need for policy reform (Ch 8) and teacher
training (Ch 3).
- Social Model (Ch 1) underpins inclusive classrooms (Ch 3) and rights
advocacy (Ch 8). Overarching Themes:
1. Collaboration: Families, teachers, and communities as partners.
2. Flexibility: UDL and differentiation as non-negotiable practices.
3. Equity vs. Equality:Tailored support over uniform treatment.

Conclusion
Inclusive education is not merely a pedagogical approach but a moral
imperative to uphold every child’s right to dignity, belonging, and learning.
Success Factors: Teacher training, family engagement, adaptable curricula.
-Gaps in Ethiopia: Weak policy enforcement, infrastructural limitations.
- Future Steps:
- Scale up UDL and IEP implementation.
- Strengthen disability rights advocacy.
- Foster community-awareness programs.
Inclusive classrooms cultivate empathy,
innovation, and societal cohesion—cornerstones of equitable development.
Summary of Main Findings:

This course provides a comprehensive roadmap for inclusive education,

establishing it as a rights-based approach requiring a systemic shift from the
medical to the social model. The core of practice lies in a cycle of collaborative
assessment, individualized planning (IEP), and differentiated instruction within
a universally designed curriculum. This ideal is constrained by significant
practical barriers, particularly in Ethiopia, including policy enforcement gaps,
resource limitations, and cultural attitudes.

Areas for Further Exploration and Application:

1. Teacher Training Reform: Radical improvement of pre-service and in-service

training focused on practical skills in UDL, differentiation, and collaboration.

2. Actionable Advocacy: Equipping teachers to advocate for resources, policy

change, and against stigma.

3. Context-Specific Strategies Developing resources for implementing inclusion

in large, under-resourced classrooms.
4. Technology Integration :Exploring low-cost and accessible assistive
technologies.

5. Strengthening Partnerships: Developing concrete models for effective,

culturally sensitive collaboration with families.

6. **Monitoring and Evaluation:** Creating tools to monitor social and

emotional inclusion, not just academic outcomes.

In conclusion, inclusive education is a challenging but essential evolution of our

education system. This course provides the knowledge base; the next step is
for educators to apply it with creativity, perseverance, and a collaborative
spirit to make inclusion a reality for every Ethiopian child.

---