0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views17 pages

Lecture 10

The document discusses Galois Theory, focusing on solving polynomial equations of degrees 2, 3, and 4. It explains the relationships between roots, symmetric polynomials, and the corresponding Galois groups, detailing how to express roots in terms of radicals. The document also outlines the construction of splitting fields and the importance of field extensions in solving these equations.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views17 pages

Lecture 10

The document discusses Galois Theory, focusing on solving polynomial equations of degrees 2, 3, and 4. It explains the relationships between roots, symmetric polynomials, and the corresponding Galois groups, detailing how to express roots in terms of radicals. The document also outlines the construction of splitting fields and the importance of field extensions in solving these equations.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

MATH 416, Modern Algebra II

Volodymyr Nekrashevych

2020, April 23

V. Nekrashevych (Texas A&M) MATH 416, Modern Algebra II 2020, April 23 1 / 17


Galois Theory

Solving equations of degree n ≤ 4

We all know 2
√ how to solve quadratic equations: the roots of x + px + q
−p± p 2 −4q
are 2 . One of the ways to deduce it is by looking at

(x − x1 )(x − x2 ) = x 2 − (x1 + x2 )x + x1 x2

and noting that (x1 − x2 )2 is a symmetric polynomial, so can be expressed


as a function of s1 = x1 + x2 and s2 = x1 x2 , namely

(x1 − x2 )2 = x12 − 2x1 x2 + x22 = (x1 + x2 )2 − 4x1 x2 = p 2 − 4q.

1 −x2 )
Then x1 − x2 = ± p 2 − 4q, and then x1,2 = (x1 +x2 )±(x
p
2 .

V. Nekrashevych (Texas A&M) MATH 416, Modern Algebra II 2020, April 23 2 / 17


Galois Theory

Cubic equations

Let us try to do something similar for cubic equations. First of all, we can
simplify x 3 + ax 2 + bx + c by substitution x = y − 3a :
(y − a/3)3 + a(y − a/3)2 + b(y − a/3) + c has coefficient at y 2 equal to
−3 3a + a = 0, so we can consider polynomials of the form x 3 + px + q. If
x1 , x2 , x3 are its roots, then we have

 x1 + x2 + x3 = 0
x1 x2 + x1 x3 + x2 x3 = p
x1 x2 x3 = −q

V. Nekrashevych (Texas A&M) MATH 416, Modern Algebra II 2020, April 23 3 / 17


Galois Theory


 x1 + x2 + x3 = 0
x1 x2 + x1 x3 + x2 x3 = p
x1 x2 x3 = −q

It follows that 0 = (x1 + x2 + x3 )3 = x13 + x23 + x33 + 3x1 x2 (x1 + x2 ) +


3x1 x3 (x1 + x3 ) + 3x2 x3 (x2 + x3 ) + 6x1 x2 x3 = x13 + x23 + x33 − 3x1 x2 x3 , so
that
x13 + x23 + x33 = −3q.
We have
(x1 x2 + x1 x3 + x2 x3 )3 = x13 x23 + x13 x33 + x23 x33 + 3 xi xj2 xk3 + 6x12 x22 x32 =
P

x13 x23 + x13 x33 + x23 x33 − 3x1 x2 x3 (x1 x2 (x1 + x2 ) + x1 x3 (x1 + x3 ) + x2 x3 (x2 +
x3 ) + 6x12 x22 x32 = x13 x23 + x13 x33 + x23 x33 − 3x12 x22 x32 , so

x13 x23 + x13 x33 + x23 x33 = p 3 + 3q 2 .

V. Nekrashevych (Texas A&M) MATH 416, Modern Algebra II 2020, April 23 4 / 17


Galois Theory

Cubic equations

x13 + x23 + x33 = −3q, x13 x23 + x13 x33 + x23 x33 = p 3 + 3q 2 .
Let us look again at the discriminant
(x1 − x2 )2 (x2 − x3 )2 (x1 − x3 )2 = (x32 − 4x1 x2 )(x12 − 4x2 x3 )(x22 − 4x1 x3 ) =
−63x12 x22 x32 − 4(x23 x33 + x13 x23 + x13 x33 ) + 16x1 x2 x3 (x13 + x23 + x33 ) =
−63q 2 − 4(p 3 + 3q 2 ) + 48q 2 = −27q 2 − 4p 3 .

V. Nekrashevych (Texas A&M) MATH 416, Modern Algebra II 2020, April 23 5 / 17


Galois Theory

Cubic equations

Therefore,
√ p
D = (x1 − x2 )(x1 − x3 )(x2 − x3 ) = −27q 2 − 4p 3 .

This expression is invariant under A3 ∼ = Z3 . Recall that


Q(p, q) ⊂ Q(x1 , x2 , x3 ) has S3 as the Galois group. A3 corresponds to an
intermediate field Q(p, q) ⊂ F ⊂ Q(x1 , x2 , x3 ). We have √
[F : Q(p, q)] = [S3 : A3 ] = 2, therefore F = Q(p, q)( D). We also have
[Q(x1 , x2 , x3 ) : F ] = |A3 | = 3. If u ∈ Q(x1 , x2 , x3 ) does not belong to F ,
then its irreducible polynomial over F has degree 3, so that
Q(x1 , x2 , x3 ) = F (u). We can simplify formulas by taking more than one
element to generate Q(x1 , x2 , x3 )

V. Nekrashevych (Texas A&M) MATH 416, Modern Algebra II 2020, April 23 6 / 17


Galois Theory

Cubic equations

Let ζ = − 12 + i 23 . Then u = (x1 + ζx2 + ζ 2 x3 )/3 and
v = (x1 + ζ 2 x2 + ζx3 )/3 are multiplied by ζ and ζ 2 if we permute
x1 7→ x2 7→ x3 . Consequently,√u 3 and v 3 are invariant under A3 , hence
they belong to F = Q(p, q)( D). But u, v ∈ / F . Note that the
permutation x2 ↔ x3 interchanges u and v . The system

 x1 + ζx2 + ζ 2 x3 = 3u

x1 + ζ 2 x2 + ζx3 = 3v
x1 + x2 + x3 = 0

has unique solution:

x1 = u + v , x2 = ζ 2 u + ζv , x3 = ζu + ζ 2 v

(use 1 + ζ + ζ 2 = 0).

V. Nekrashevych (Texas A&M) MATH 416, Modern Algebra II 2020, April 23 7 / 17


Galois Theory

Cubic equations
In fact, a direct check shows that u 3 and v 3 satisfy the equation
 p 3
y 2 + qy − = 0,
3
q
q 2 p 3
hence they are equal to − q2 ± 2 + 3 , which gives the formulas
s r  s r 
3 q q 2  p  3 3 q q 2  p 3
x1 = − + + + − − + ,
2 2 3 2 2 3
s r  s r 
3 q q 2  p 3 3 q q 2  p 3
x2 = ζ2 − + + +ζ − − + ,
2 2 3 2 2 3
s r  s r 
3 q q 2  p 3 2 3 q q 2  p 3
x3 = ζ − + + +ζ − − +
2 2 3 2 2 3

V. Nekrashevych (Texas A&M) MATH 416, Modern Algebra II 2020, April 23 8 / 17


Galois Theory

Cubic equation: overview

The goal was to understand the splitting field Q(x1 , x2 , x3 ) of the


polynomial x 3 + px + q over Q(p, q). The Galois group is the symmetric
group S3 permuting the roots x1 , x2 , x3 . We have a chain of subgroups
{1} < A3 < S3 . Therefore, we will have a chain of subfields
Q(p, q) ⊂ F ⊂ Q(x1 , x2 , x3 ). Since the indices are [S3 : A3 ] = 2,
[A3 : {1}] = 3, the degrees are [F : Q(p, q)] = 2 and
[Q(x1 , x2 , x3 ) : F ] = 3. We check that u 3 = (x1 + ζx2 + ζ 2 x3 )3 is fixed
under A3 , but u is not. It follows that u 3 ∈ F but u is not in F , so
Q(x1 , x2 , x3 ) = F (u). We also check that D = (x1 − x2 )(x2 − x3 )(x3 − x1 )
is fixed by A3 and not by S3 , hence D ∈ F but not in Q(p, q). We also see
that D 2 is fixed by S3 , so D 2 ∈ Q(p, q). It follows that D is a square root
of a function in p and q. u 3 ∈ F , so u 3 can be expressed using D and p, q.
Consequently, u is a cube root of an expression involving p, q, D. Since
x1 , x2 , x3 ∈ F (u), all roots can be expressed using p, q, D, u.

V. Nekrashevych (Texas A&M) MATH 416, Modern Algebra II 2020, April 23 9 / 17


Galois Theory

We see that the main idea was to find a tower of fields


Q(p, q) ⊂ F ⊂ Q(x1 , x2 , x3 ) such that each extension F1 ⊂ F2 in the tower
can be written as F2 = F1 (α) for some α such that αn ∈ F1 for some n,
i.e., α is a root of x n − a for some a ∈ F1 . Such extensions are called
radical. An equation can be solved in radicals if its splitting field can be
constructed using a tower of consecutive radical extensions.

V. Nekrashevych (Texas A&M) MATH 416, Modern Algebra II 2020, April 23 10 / 17


Galois Theory

Degree 4 equations

A degree 4 equation can be also reduced to x 4 + px 2 + qx + r = 0 by a


change of variable x 7→ y − a/4. We can look at x 4 + px 2 + qx + r as at a
polynomial over Q(p, q, r ). Let x1 , x2 , x3 , x4 be its roots, so that the
splitting field is Q(x1 , x2 , x3 , x4 ). The Galois group of the polynomial is S4 .
We have a composition series

{1} ≤ Z2 ≤ Z2 ⊕ Z2 ≤ A4 ≤ S4

with factors Z2 , Z2 , Z3 , Z2 . This will correspond to a tower of field


extensions with degrees 2, 3, 2, 2.

V. Nekrashevych (Texas A&M) MATH 416, Modern Algebra II 2020, April 23 11 / 17


Galois Theory

Degree 4 equations

The Klein’s four-group V ∼ = Z2 ⊕ Z2 plays an important role here. Recall


that it consists of the permutations
(x1 , x2 )(x3 , x4 ), (x1 , x3 )(x2 , x4 ), (x1 , x4 )(x3 , x2 ).
Let F be the corresponding fixed field. It is easy to see that the expressions
z1 = 12 (x1 x2 + x3 x4 ), z2 = 21 (x1 x3 + x2 x4 ) and z3 = 21 (x1 x4 + x2 x3 ) are
fixed by V , i.e., belong to F . The symmetric group S4 permutes z1 , z2 , z3 ,
and elements of V are the only elements fixing each zi . (BTW, this
explicitly gives an epimorphism S4 −→ S3 with kernel V .)

V. Nekrashevych (Texas A&M) MATH 416, Modern Algebra II 2020, April 23 12 / 17


Galois Theory

Degree 4 equations

Since S4 permutes z1 , z2 , z3 , the elements


z1 + z2 + z3 , z1 z2 + z1 z3 + z2 z3 , z1 z2 z3 are fixed by S4 , hence belong to
Q(p, q, r ). It follows that z1 , z2 , z3 are roots of a cubic polynomial with
coefficients in Q(p, q, r ). In fact, they are roots of the cubic resolvent

q2
 
3 p 2 pr
z − z − rz + − = 0.
2 2 8

V. Nekrashevych (Texas A&M) MATH 416, Modern Algebra II 2020, April 23 13 / 17


Galois Theory

Degree 4 equations

We know how to solve it, so we will get expressions for z1 , z2 , z3 . We have


2z1 = x1 x2 + x3 x4 and r = x1 x2 · x3 x4 . It follows that x1 x2 and x3 x4 are
roots of the polynomial x 2 − 2z1 x + r . We also have,
2(z2 + z3 ) = x1 x3 + x2 x4 + x1 x4 + x2 x3 = (x1 + x2 )(x3 + x4 ) and
(x1 + x2 ) + (x3 + x4 ) = 0. Consequently, (x1 + x2 ) and (x3 + x4 ) are roots
of x 2 + 2(z2 + z3 ). Solving these quadratic equations, we will find
x1 x2 , x1 + x2 , x3 x4 , x3 + x4 . Then, solving the quadratic equations
x 2 − (x1 + x2 )x + x1 x2 = 0 and x 2 − (x3 + x4 )x + x3 x4 = 0 we will find
x1 , x2 , x3 , x4 .

V. Nekrashevych (Texas A&M) MATH 416, Modern Algebra II 2020, April 23 14 / 17


Galois Theory

General discussion

An extension F ⊂ E is an extension of F by radicals if there is a sequences


of extensions
F = F0 ⊂ F 1 ⊂ F2 ⊂ . . . ⊂ Fm = E
such that for each Fi ⊂ Fi+1 there exist αi and ni such that Fi+1 = Fi (αi )
and αini ∈ Fi .
We say that a polynomial f (x) ∈ F [x] is solvable by radicals if its splitting
field is contained in a radical extension of F . Solving a general equation of
degree n in radicals corresponds to solvability of a general polynomial
x n + an−1 x n−1 + · · · + a1 x + a0 ∈ Q(a1 , a2 , . . . , an−1 )[x] in radicals. We
have seen that general polynomials are solvable in radicals for n = 1, 2, 3, 4.

V. Nekrashevych (Texas A&M) MATH 416, Modern Algebra II 2020, April 23 15 / 17


Galois Theory

Some particular (non-general) equations of higher degree may be solvable


in radicals. For example, x n − 1 or x n − a are solvable for every n and a.
Recall that a group G is called solvable if there exists a series

{1} = G0 C G1 C G2 C · · · C Gn = G

such that all factor groups Gi+1 /Gi are abelian.

V. Nekrashevych (Texas A&M) MATH 416, Modern Algebra II 2020, April 23 16 / 17


Galois Theory

Theorem 1
A polynomial f (x) ∈ F [x] is solvable in radicals (if and) only if its Galois
group is solvable.

As a corollary, we get
Theorem 2
The general polynomial equation of degree n is solvable in radicals if and
only if n ≥ 4.

Namely, for n ≥ 5 the subgroup An < Sn is simple. (It is easier to show


that the subgroup of An generated by the commutators g −1 h−1 gh is the
whole group An , so that any homomorphism to an abelian group from An
has An as the kernel, so there are not subgroups H C An such that An /H
is abelian.)

V. Nekrashevych (Texas A&M) MATH 416, Modern Algebra II 2020, April 23 17 / 17

You might also like