Chameli Devi Group of Institutions, Indore

Department of Computer Science & Engineering

RUBRICS FOR MAJOR PROJECT EVALUATION

SESSION: 2025-26

Rubrics Review
Over all
Review # Agenda Assessment Review Assessment Weightage
Weightage
Review 1 Project Synopsis/ Proposal Evaluation Rubric R1 (18)
Review 2 Mid-Term Project Evaluation Rubric R2 (24)
Review 3 End Semester Project Evaluation Rubric R3 (24)
(100)
Review 4 Project Report Evaluation Rubric R4 (16)

Review 5 Evaluation by Guide Rubric R5 (18)

External Evaluation (100) (100)
Total (200) (200)
 Rubric #R1: Project Synopsis/ Proposal Evaluation
Maximum Marks*: 18

Level of Achievement

Good (5-6) Average (3-4) Poor (1-2) Score

Detailed and extensive Average explanation of the Minimal explanation of the

Identification of Problem
a explanation of the purpose purpose and need of the purpose and need of the
Domain and Detailed Analysis
and need of the project project project

Detailed and extensive Minimal explanation of the

Study of the Existing Systems explanation of the Moderate study of the specifications and the
b and Feasibility of Project specifications and the existing systems; collects limitations of the existing
Proposal limitations of the existing some basic information systems; incomplete
systems information

All objectives of the Incomplete justification to Objectives of the proposed

proposed work are well the objectives proposed; work are either not identified
Objectives and Methodology of defined; Steps to be followed Steps are mentioned but or not well defined;
c
the Proposed Work to solve the defined problem unclear; without Incomplete and improper
are clearly specified justification to objectives specification

*Maximum Marks Rubric1 (18) = a(6)+ b(6)+ c(6) Rubric2 (24) = a(8)+ b(8)+ c(8)
Rubric3 (24) = a(6)+ b(6)+ c(6)+ d(6) Rubric4 (16) = a(4)+ b(4)+ c(4)+ d(4)
Rubric5 (18) = a(6)+ b(6)+ c(6)
 Rubric #R2: Mid-term Project Evaluation
Maximum Marks*: 24
Level of Achievement
Excellent (7-8) Good (5-6) Average (3-4) Poor (1-2) Score
• Divison of problem • Divison of problem • Divison of problem
• Modular approach
into modules and into modules and into modules but
not adopted
good selection of good selection of inappropriate
Design
a computing framework computing selection of • Design
Methodology methodology not
• Appropriate design framework computing framework
defined
methodology and • Design methodology • Design methodology
properly justification not properly justified not defined properly

Planning of • Time frame properly • Time frame properly • Time frame properly • Time frame not
Project Work specified and being specified and being specified, but not properly specified
followed followed
b and Team being followed • In-appropriate
Structure • Appropriate • Distribution of
• Distribution of project distribution of
distribution of project project work
work un-even project work
work inappropriate
• Objectives achieved
• Objectives achieved as per time frame • Objectives achieved
as per time frame • Contents of as per time frame • No objectives
• Contents of presentations are • Contents of achieved
presentations are appropriate but not presentations are • Contents of
Demonstration
appropriate and well well arranged appropriate but not presentations are
c and
arranged • Satisfactory well arranged not appropriate and
Presentation
• Proper eye contact demonstration, clear • Presentation not not well delivered
with audience and voice with good satisfactory and • Poor delivery of
clear voice with good spoken language but average presentation
spoken language eye contact not demonstration
proper

*Maximum Marks Rubric1 (18) = a(6)+ b(6)+ c(6) Rubric2 (24) = a(8)+ b(8)+ c(8)
Rubric3 (24) = a(6)+ b(6)+ c(6)+ d(6) Rubric4 (16) = a(4)+ b(4)+ c(4)+ d(4)
Rubric5 (18) = a(6)+ b(6)+ c(6)
 Rubric #R3: End Semester Internal Project Evaluation
Maximum Marks*: 24
Level of Achievement
Excellent (6) Good (4-5) Average (2-3) Poor (1) Score
Changes are made as per Changes are made as per
Few changes are made as per Suggestions during mid
Incorporation modifications suggested modifications suggested
a modifications suggested term evaluation are not
of Suggestions during mid term evaluation and during mid term evaluation
during mid term evaluation incorporated
new innovations added and good justification
• All defined objectives are
• All defined objectives are • Some of the defined objectives • Defined objectives are
achieved
achieved are achieved not achieved
• Each module working well
Project • Each module working well and • Modules are working well in • Modules are not in
and properly demonstrated
b properly demonstrated isolation and properly proper working form
Demonstration • Integration of all modules
• All modules of project are well demonstrated that further leads to
not done and system
integrated and system working • Modules of project are not failure of integrated
working is not veey
is accurate properly integrated system
satisfactory
• Contents of presentations • Contents of
• Contents of presentations are • Contents of presentations are
are appropriate and well presentations are not
appropriate and well delivered not appropriate
delivered appropriate and not
c Presentation • Proper eye contact with • Eye contact with few people
• Clear voice with good well delivered
audience and clear voice with and unclear voice
spoken language but less • Poor delivery of
good spoken language
eye contact with audience presentation
• Able to answer all the • Able to answer all the • Unable to answer all
• Able to answer few questions
d Viva-Voce questions with proper questions without proper the questions with
with proper explanation
explanation explanation proper explanation

*Maximum Marks Rubric1 (18) = a(6)+ b(6)+ c(6) Rubric2 (24) = a(8)+ b(8)+ c(8)
Rubric3 (24) = a(6)+ b(6)+ c(6)+ d(6) Rubric4 (16) = a(4)+ b(4)+ c(4)+ d(4)
Rubric5 (18) = a(6)+ b(6)+ c(6)
 Rubric #R4: Project Report Evaluation
Maximum Marks*: 16
Level of Achievement
Excellent (4) Good (3) Average (2) Poor (1) Score
•Project report is
•Project report is according to •Project report is according •Project report not
according to the specified
the specified format to the specified format but prepared according to
Project format
a •References and citations are some mistakes the specified format
Report •References and citations
appropriate and well •In-sufficient references •References and citations
are appropriate but not
mentioned and citations are not appropriate
mentioned well
• Complete explanation of
• Complete explanation of the • Complete explanation of • Inapproiate explanation
Description of the key concepts but little
b key concepts the key concepts of the key concepts
Concepts relevance to literature

• Moderate description of • Poor description of the

• Strong description of the • In-sufficient description of
Technical the technical technical requirements
c technical requirements of the technical requirements
Details requirements of the of the project
the project of the project
project •

• Results are not

• Results are presented in • Results presented are not
• Results are presented in very presented properly
good manner much satisfactory
appropriate manner • Project work is not
Conclusion • Project work summary • Project work summary and
• Project work is well summarized and
d and and conclusion not very conclusion not very
summarized and concluded concluded
Discussion appropriate appropriate
• Future extensions in the • Future extensions in the
• Future extensions in the • Future extensions in the
project are well specified project are not
project are specified project are specified
specified

*Maximum Marks Rubric1 (18) = a(6)+ b(6)+ c(6) Rubric2 (24) = a(8)+ b(8)+ c(8)
Rubric3 (24) = a(6)+ b(6)+ c(6)+ d(6) Rubric4 (16) = a(4)+ b(4)+ c(4)+ d(4)
Rubric5 (18) = a(6)+ b(6)+ c(6)
 Rubric #R5: Evaluation by Guide
Maximum Marks*: 18
Level of Achievement
Good (5-6) Average (3-4) Poor (1-2) Score

Exchanges some views

Makes little or no attempt to
Collaborates and communicates in a group but requires guidance
a Working within a Team collaborate in a group
situation and integrates the views of others to collaborate with
situation
others.

Technical Knowledge
Fair knowledge related
b and Awareness related Extensive knowledge related to the project Lacks sufficient knowledge
to the project
to the Project

Reports to the guide regularly and consistent in Not very regular but Irregular in attendance and
c Regularity
work consistent in the work inconsistent in work

*Maximum Marks Rubric1 (18) = a(6)+ b(6)+ c(6) Rubric2 (24) = a(8)+ b(8)+ c(8)
Rubric3 (24) = a(6)+ b(6)+ c(6)+ d(6) Rubric4 (16) = a(4)+ b(4)+ c(4)+ d(4)
Rubric5 (18) = a(6)+ b(6)+ c(6)