Volvo Group
Volvo Group
EIGHTH EDITION
ISBN: 978-1-61853-122-3
MICHAEL DRAKE
ELLEN ENGEL
D. ERIC HIRST
MARY LEA MCANALLY
© Copyright 2015 by Cambridge Business Publishers, LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this
publication may be reproduced in any form for any purpose without the written permission of the
publisher.
This document is authorized for use by William Heninger, from 03/06/2024 to 06/06/2024
in the course: Financial & Managerial Accounting - Heninger (Spring 2024), Brigham Young University.
Any unauthorized use or reproduction of this document is strictly prohibited.
Volvo Group—Research & Development Costs
Volvo Group supplies commercial vehicles including trucks, buses, construction equipment, engines and drive
systems as well as aircraft engine components. Volvo Group annually invests roughly 13 billion Swedish Krona in
research and development activities focused on achieving new technical breakthroughs focused largely on reducing
environmental impact and meeting future emissions and other regulations globally. Volvo Group also offers its
customers financial solutions. The Group, headquartered in Torslanda, Sweden, has about 90,000 employees,
production facilities in 19 countries, and sales activities in some 180 countries. Source: Company annual report.
Learning Objectives
• Assess the cost components included in research and development (R&D) expenditures.
• Compare and evaluate alternative accounting treatments of research and development costs.
• Understand how capitalizing product development costs affects the balance sheet, the income
statement, and the statement of cash flows.
• Adjust financial statement amounts to compare U.S. and international methods of R&D accounting.
Refer to the 2009 financial statements of Volvo Group. The company prepares financial statements under
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).
Concepts
a. The 2009 income statement shows research and development expenses of SEK 13,193 (millions of
Swedish Krona). What types of costs are likely included in these amounts?
b. Volvo Group follows IAS 38—Intangible Assets, to account for its research and development
expenditures (see IAS 38 excerpts at the end of this case). As such, the company capitalizes certain
R&D costs and expenses others. What factors does Volvo Group consider as it decides which R&D
costs to capitalize and which to expense?
c. The R&D costs that Volvo Group capitalizes each period (labeled Product and software development
costs) are amortized in subsequent periods, similar to other capital assets such as property and
equipment. Notes to Volvo’s financial statements disclose that capitalized product and software
development costs are amortized over three to eight years. What factors would the company consider
in determining the amortization period for particular costs?
d. Under U.S. GAAP, companies must expense all R&D costs. In your opinion, which accounting
principle (IFRS or U.S. GAAP) provides financial statements that better reflect costs and benefits of
periodic R&D spending?
Process
e. Refer to footnote 14 where Volvo reports an intangible asset for “Product and software development.”
Assume that the product and software development costs reported in footnote 14 are the only R&D
costs that Volvo capitalizes.
i. What is the amount of the capitalized product and software development costs, net of
accumulated amortization at the end of fiscal 2009? Which line item on Volvo Group’s balance
sheet reports this intangible asset?
ii. Create a T-account for the intangible asset “Product and software development,” net of
accumulated amortization. Enter the opening and ending balances for fiscal 2009. Show entries
in the T-account that record the 2009 capitalization (capital expenditures) and amortization. To
simplify the analysis, group all other account activity during the year and report the net impact
as one entry in the T-account.
Volvo Group—Research & Development Costs
1
© Copyright 2015 by Cambridge Business Publishers. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form for any
purpose without the written permission of the publisher.
This document is authorized for use by William Heninger, from 03/06/2024 to 06/06/2024
in the course: Financial & Managerial Accounting - Heninger (Spring 2024), Brigham Young University.
Any unauthorized use or reproduction of this document is strictly prohibited.
f. Refer to Volvo’s balance sheet, footnotes, and the eleven-year summary. Assume that the product and
software development costs reported in footnote 14 are the only R&D costs that Volvo capitalizes.
i. Complete the table below for Volvo’s Product and software development intangible asset.
(in SEK millions) 2007 2008 2009
1) Product and software development costs 2,057 2,150
capitalized during the year
2) Total R&D expense on the income
statement
3) Amortization of previously capitalized 2,357 2,864
costs (included in R&D expense)
4) Total R&D costs incurred during the
year = 1 + 2 - 3
ii. Provide the journal entry that Volvo Group prepared to record 1) total 2009 R&D costs
incurred during the year and 2) the amortization of previously capitalized product and software
development costs. Consider your answer to part a, above to determine which accounts are
affected. (Hint: you will not be able to allocate specific amounts for each of the accounts you
credit, but you should be able to identify the accounts that are likely to be credited.)
iii. What proportion of Total R&D costs incurred did Volvo Group capitalize (as product and
software development intangible asset) in each of the three years?
Analysis
g. Assume that you work as a financial analyst for Volvo Group and would like to compare Volvo’s
research and development expenditures to a U.S. competitor, Navistar International Corporation.
Navistar follows U.S. GAAP that requires that all research and development costs be expensed in the
year they are incurred. You gather the following information for Navistar for fiscal year end October
31, 2007 through 2009.
i. Use the information from Volvo’s eleven-year summary to complete the following table:
ii. Calculate the proportion of total research and development costs incurred to net sales from
operations (called, net sales from manufactured products, for Navistar) for both firms. How
does the proportion compare between the two companies?
This document is authorized for use by William Heninger, from 03/06/2024 to 06/06/2024
in the course: Financial & Managerial Accounting - Heninger (Spring 2024), Brigham Young University.
Any unauthorized use or reproduction of this document is strictly prohibited.
h. Assume that you work as a financial analyst for Navistar International Corporation. Your firm is
considering the financial statement implications of adopting IFRS including IAS 38. As such, you
decide to prepare pro forma (i.e., “as if”) information for Navistar assuming the company had adopted
IAS 38 at the start of fiscal 2007. Refer to financial statement information for Navistar, in part g,
above.
To create the pro forma information, assume the following.
• Beginning in fiscal 2007, 30% of Navistar’s total R&D expenditures could be considered
product development costs and would be eligible for capitalization under IAS 38.
• Internal forecasts predict that capitalized product development costs have an estimated useful
life of four years. Had Navistar followed IAS 38, they would have amortized the
development costs on a straight-line basis over four years, beginning the year after
capitalization.
• Your analysis should consider only the impact of adopting IAS 38. All other Navistar activity
is reported using U.S. GAAP.
i. What would Navistar have reported as Operating income before tax in fiscal 2007, 2008, and
2009 under IFRS? Is the difference significant?
ii. What amount for “Capitalized product development costs, net” would Navistar have reported
on its balance sheet at the end of each of the three years under IFRS? Calculate the relative size
of the intangible asset each year compared to total assets. How does this compare to the relative
size for Volvo Group? (Volvo Group’s 2007 balance sheet included “Capitalized product
development costs, net” of 11,169, in SEK millions.) In your opinion, is this a significant asset
on Navistar International’s balance sheet?
iii. How would cash be affected for fiscal 2009 had Navistar followed IFRS? Would the cash flow
statement be different? Assume that the tax treatment of R&D expenditures is not related to the
accounting treatment.
This document is authorized for use by William Heninger, from 03/06/2024 to 06/06/2024
in the course: Financial & Managerial Accounting - Heninger (Spring 2024), Brigham Young University.
Any unauthorized use or reproduction of this document is strictly prohibited.
Internally Generated Intangible Assets (excerpt from IAS 38—Intangible Assets)
51. It is sometimes difficult to assess whether an internally generated intangible asset qualifies for
recognition because of problems in:
(a) identifying whether and when there is an identifiable asset that will generate expected
future economic benefits; and
(b) determining the cost of the asset reliably. In some cases, the cost of generating an intangible
asset internally cannot be distinguished from the cost of maintaining or enhancing the
entity’s internally generated goodwill or of running day-to-day operations.
52. Therefore, in addition to complying with the general requirements for the recognition and
initial measurement of an intangible asset, an entity applies the requirements and guidance in
paragraphs 52–67 to all internally generated intangible assets.
To assess whether an internally generated intangible asset meets the criteria for recognition, an
entity classifies the generation of the asset into:
Although the terms ‘research’ and ‘development’ are defined, the terms ‘research phase’ and
‘development phase’ have a broader meaning for the purpose of this Standard.
53. If an entity cannot distinguish the research phase from the development phase of an internal
project to create an intangible asset, the entity treats the expenditure on that project as if it were
incurred in the research phase only.
Research Phase
54. No intangible asset arising from research (or from the research phase of an internal
project) shall be recognised. Expenditure on research (or on the research phase of an
internal project) shall be recognised as an expense when it is incurred.
55. In the research phase of an internal project, an entity cannot demonstrate that an intangible
asset exists that will generate probable future economic benefits. Therefore, this expenditure is
recognised as an expense when it is incurred.
Development Phase
57. An intangible asset arising from development (or from the development phase of an
internal project) shall be recognised if, and only if, an entity can demonstrate all of the
following:
This document is authorized for use by William Heninger, from 03/06/2024 to 06/06/2024
in the course: Financial & Managerial Accounting - Heninger (Spring 2024), Brigham Young University.
Any unauthorized use or reproduction of this document is strictly prohibited.
(a) the technical feasibility of completing the intangible asset so that it will be available
for use or sale.
(b) its intention to complete the intangible asset and use or sell it.
(c) its ability to use or sell the intangible asset.
(d) how the intangible asset will generate probable future economic benefits. Among
other things, the entity can demonstrate the existence of a market for the output of
the intangible asset or the intangible asset itself or, if it is to be used internally, the
usefulness of the intangible asset.
(e) the availability of adequate technical, financial and other resources to complete the
development and to use or sell the intangible asset.
(f) its ability to measure reliably the expenditure attributable to the intangible asset
during its development.
58. In the development phase of an internal project, an entity can, in some instances, identify an
intangible asset and demonstrate that the asset will generate probable future economic benefits.
This is because the development phase of a project is further advanced than the research phase.
This document is authorized for use by William Heninger, from 03/06/2024 to 06/06/2024
in the course: Financial & Managerial Accounting - Heninger (Spring 2024), Brigham Young University.
Any unauthorized use or reproduction of this document is strictly prohibited.
Consolidated income statements
Attributable to:
Equity holders of the parent company 9,942 (14,718)
Minority interests Note 13 74 33
10,016 (14,685)
Attributable to:
Equity holders of the parent company 12,874 (13,561)
Minority interests 87 52
12,961 (13,509)
This document is authorized for use by William Heninger, from 03/06/2024 to 06/06/2024
in the course: Financial & Managerial Accounting - Heninger (Spring 2024), Brigham Young University.
Any unauthorized use or reproduction of this document is strictly prohibited.
FINANCIAL INFOrMATION 2009
Current assets
Inventories Note 18 55,045 37,727
Current receivables
Customer-financing receivables Note 19 48,057 42,264
Tax assets 1,810 1,523
Interest-bearing receivables Note 20 1,965 410
Accounts receivable Note 20 30,523 21,337
Other receivables Note 20 15,024 12,082
Non interest-bearing assets held for sale Note 4 – 1,684
Interest-bearing assets held for sale – 97,379 8 79,308
Marketable securities Note 21 5,902 16,676
Cash and cash equivalents Note 22 17,712 21,234
Total current assets 176,038 154,945
Total assets 372,419 332,265
Non-current provisions
Provisions for post-employment benefits Note 24 11,705 8,051
Provisions for deferred taxes Note 12 8,260 3,638
Other provisions Note 25 8,136 28,101 6,360 18,049
This document is authorized for use by William Heninger, from 03/06/2024 to 06/06/2024
in the course: Financial & Managerial Accounting - Heninger (Spring 2024), Brigham Young University.
Any unauthorized use or reproduction of this document is strictly prohibited.
Changes in consolidated Shareholders’ equity
Shareholders’ equity attributable to equity holders
of the parent company
Share Other Translation retained Minority Total
SEK M capital reserves1 reserve earnings Total interests equity
Balance at December 31, 2007 2,554 435 1,711 77,502 82,202 579 82,781
Total income for the period – (2,698) 5,630 9,942 12,874 87 12,961
Balance at December 31, 2008 2,554 (2,263) 7,341 76,378 84,010 630 84,640
Total income for the period – 2,386 (1,229) (14,718) (13,561) 52 (13,509)
Balance at December 31, 2009 2,554 123 6,112 57,616 66,405 629 67,034
This document is authorized for use by William Heninger, from 03/06/2024 to 06/06/2024
in the course: Financial & Managerial Accounting - Heninger (Spring 2024), Brigham Young University.
Any unauthorized use or reproduction of this document is strictly prohibited.
FINANCIAL INFOrMATION 2009
Investing activities
Investments in fixed assets (12,664) (10,464)
Investments in leasing assets (5,440) (4,246)
Disposals of fixed assets and leasing assets 2,905 3,849
Shares and participations, net Note 30 (29) (38)
Acquired and divested subsidiaries and other business units, net Note 4, 30 (1,317) 149
Interest-bearing receivables including marketable securities 10,882 (5,663) (8,866) (19,616)
Cash-flow after net investments (4,894) (4,760)
Financing activities
Increase/(decrease) in bond loans and other loans Note 30 18,230 12,655
Cash payment to AB Volvo shareholders’ (11,150) (4,055)
Dividends to minority shareholders (54) (15)
Other 8 7,034 (58) 8,527
Change in cash and cash equivalents,
excluding translation differences 2,140 3,767
The effects of major acquisitions and divestments of subsidiaries in excluded since these effects do not affect cash flow. Cash and cash
each year have been excluded from other changes for the balance equivalents include cash and bank balances but also bank certificates
sheet items in the cash-flow statement. The effects of currency move- which matures within 3 months from aquisition.
ments in translation of foreign Group companies have also been
This document is authorized for use by William Heninger, from 03/06/2024 to 06/06/2024
in the course: Financial & Managerial Accounting - Heninger (Spring 2024), Brigham Young University.
Any unauthorized use or reproduction of this document is strictly prohibited.
FINANCIAL INFOrMATION 2009
This document is authorized for use by William Heninger, from 03/06/2024 to 06/06/2024
in the course: Financial & Managerial Accounting - Heninger (Spring 2024), Brigham Young University.
Any unauthorized use or reproduction of this document is strictly prohibited.
Note 14 Intangible and tangible assets
Net carrying value in balance sheet 2008 24,813 1,870 12,381 4,894 43,958
Net carrying value in balance sheet 2009 23,827 2,071 11,409 4,321 41,628
This document is authorized for use by William Heninger, from 03/06/2024 to 06/06/2024
in the course: Financial & Managerial Accounting - Heninger (Spring 2024), Brigham Young University.
Any unauthorized use or reproduction of this document is strictly prohibited.
Eleven-year summary
The eleven-year summary presents each year in accordance with Gen- in the business units are transferred back to the product areas. Also, as
eral Accepted Accounting Practice for that year. Earlier years are not from January 1, 2007, the responsibility for the Group’s treasury oper-
restated when new accounting standards are applied. The years 1999– ations and real estate has been transferred from Financial services,
2003 are accounted for in accordance with Swedish GAAP for the which, as from January 1, 2007, only are consolidated in accordance
respective year. As from 2004 the reporting is based on IFrS. The tran- with the purchase method. Comparison figures for 2006 have been
sition to IFrS is described in note 3 in the Annual reports 2005 and recalculated.
2006. As from January 1, 2007, the benefits from the synergies created
research and
development expenses (4,525) (4,876) (5,391) (5,869) (6,829) (7,614) (7,557) (8,354) (11,059) (14,348) (13,193)
Selling expenses (8,865) (10,140) (15,766) (16,604) (16,866) (19,369) (20,778) (21,213) (26,068) (27,129) (25,334)
Administrative expenses (4,791) (4,974) (6,709) (5,658) (5,467) (5,483) (6,301) (6,551) (7,133) (6,940) (5,863)
Other operating income and
expenses (611) 622 (4,096) (4,152) (1,367) (618) (588) (3,466) 163 (1,915) (4,798)
Income (loss) from investments
in associated companies 567 444 50 182 200 27 (557) 61 430 25 (14)
Income from other investments 170 70 1,410 309 (3,579) 830 37 141 93 69 (6)
Income from divestment
of subsidiaries 26,695 – – – – – – – – – –
restructuring costs – – (3,862) – – – – – – – –
Operating income (loss) 34,158 6,668 (676) 2,837 2,504 14,679 18,153 20,399 22,231 15,851 (17,013)
Interest income and similar credits 1,812 1,588 1,275 1,217 1,096 821 654 666 952 1,171 390
Interest expenses and
similar charges (1,505) (1,845) (2,274) (1,840) (1,888) (1,254) (972) (585) (1,122) (1,935) (3,559)
Other financial income
and expenses 131 (165) (191) (201) (55) (1,210) 181 (181) (504) (1,077) (392)
Income (loss) after
financial items 34,596 6,246 (1,866) 2,013 1,657 13,036 18,016 20,299 21,557 14,010 (20,573)
Income taxes (2,270) (1,510) 326 (590) (1,334) (3,129) (4,908) (3,981) (6,529) (3,994) 5,889
Income (loss) for the period 32,326 4,736 (1,540) 1,423 323 9,907 13,108 16,318 15,028 10,016 (14,685)
Attributable to
Equity holders of the parent
company 32,222 4,709 (1,467) 1,393 298 9,867 13,054 16,268 14,932 9,942 (14,718)
Minority interest 104 27 (73) 30 25 40 54 50 96 74 33
32,326 4,736 (1,540) 1,423 323 9,907 13,108 16,318 15,028 10,016 (14,685)
research and
development expenses (4,525) (4,876) (5,391) (5,869) (6,829) (7,614) (7,557) (8,354) (11,059) (14,348) (13,193)
Selling expenses (8,117) (9,285) (14,663) (15,393) (15,891) (18,317) (19,616) (19,999) (24,671) (25,597) (23,752)
Administrative expenses (4,632) (4,651) (6,474) (5,464) (5,259) (5,310) (6,147) (6,481) (7,092) (6,921) (5,838)
Other operating income and
expenses (587) 309 (3,071) (2,989) (540) 7 (397) (3,275) 249 (1,457) (2,432)
Income from Financial Services 1,066 1,499 325 490 926 1,365 2,033 – – – –
Income (loss) from investments
in associated companies 478 341 (86) 126 166 2 (568) 61 428 23 (15)
Income from other investments 170 70 1,408 309 (3,581) 828 37 141 93 69 (13)
Income from divestment
of subsidiaries 26,695 – – – – – – – – – –
restructuring costs – – (3,862) – – – – – – – –
Operating income (loss) 34,158 6,668 (676) 2,837 2,504 14,679 18,153 18,713 20,583 14,454 (16,333)
This document is authorized for use by William Heninger, from 03/06/2024 to 06/06/2024
in the course: Financial & Managerial Accounting - Heninger (Spring 2024), Brigham Young University.
Any unauthorized use or reproduction of this document is strictly prohibited.