0% found this document useful (0 votes)
34 views16 pages

Allegation File 1

Uploaded by

isshuu26
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
34 views16 pages

Allegation File 1

Uploaded by

isshuu26
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

JUNE 2025

INTERNSHIP PROJECT
COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 9

Presented To,
The Honorable Lok Ayukta
Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar
Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh
226010

Presented By- Chandani Khatoon


2nd Year Law Student

City Academy Law College, Chinhat ,Lucknow


COMPLAINT FORM
Under Section 9 of THE UTTAR PRADESH LOK AYUKTA AND UP-
LOKAYUKTAS ACT, 1975
Before the Honorable Lok Ayukta for Uttar Pradesh

Serial No. Topic Details


1 Name of the Complainant Ms. Aradhana Sharma
2 Father’s Name Mr. Dinesh Sharma
3 (a) Occupation Contractor
(b) Whether you are No
Public Servant
or not?
(c) If the Complaint is N/A
on behalf of any
other person, state
your relationship
with that person (
Also annex
documents any, to
prove that you
represent his estate
or he has
authorized you in
this behalf)

4 Permanent Address
(a) Name Ms. Aradhana Sharma
(b) Place Nanda Nagar,Gorakhpur
Airport
(c) Police Station Nanda Nagar Police
Station
(d) District Gorakhpur
5 Communication Address

(a) Name Ms. Aradhana Sharma


(b) Place Nanda Nagar, Gorakhpur
Airport
(c) Police Station Nanda Nagar Police
Station
(d) District Gorakhpur
6
(a) Name Mr. Anuj Sethi, Sadar
Designation ( as tahsil, Golghar,
at the time of Gorakhpur
the matter
complaint
against) and
present address
( if known) of
the person
against whom
complaint is
being made
(b) Date when the 17/09/2023 ( 17th
cause for the September, 2023)
complaint
arose
(c) Reason for Lack of Awareness
delay in
submitting the
( being time-
barred under
sub- section (4)
of Section 8)
(d) Whether any Yes, Mr. Krishna
complaint was Chaudhary Assistant
earlier made Superintendent of Police
before a
superior
authority or
proceedings
taken before a
tribunal or a
Court of law?
If so, with what
result? If not,
please briefly
state the
reasons.
7 Whether it is-
(a) An Yes
allegation
[as defined
in Section
2 (b) of
Act], or
(b) A
grievance
[ as defined
in section
2(d) of the
act]
8 Challan no. Challan Number
and date of 8443-00-103-00-
deposit of 00
security for Date of Deposit-
cost under 15/09/2025
rule 4.
9 List of
persons who Rohit Sharma
have sworn
affidavits in
support of
the
complaint
10 Are there Yes, Mr. Krishna
other Chaudhary,
persons who Assistant
have Superintendent
knowledge of Police
about the
facts relating
to the
complaint
whom you

would like
to be
summoned
by the
Lokayukta /
UP
Lokayukta
11 List of 1. Complaint form
documents 2. Application to the
attached to Honorable Lok
the Ayukta
complaint 3. Original Challan
including 4. Affidavit of Ms.
affidavit of Aradhana Sharma
the 5. Affidavit of
complaint Mr. Rohit Sharma
6. Bank Details
7. Evidence
(a) Application to Mr.
Krishna Chaudhary,
Assistant
Superintendent of
Police
12 The The Complainant, a small
particulars contractor in Sadar tehsil,
of the had high hopes after
complaint applying for a government
(here please road tender worth Rupees
state full 2.5 crore. Her documents
fact of the were legally valid, yet the
complaint. file didn’t move for weeks.
Additional
pages can be
added, if the Frustrated , he visited
space below tahsildar Mr. Anuj Sethi,
is who casually said, If you
insufficient want your file cleared,
arrange 20 lakh rupees. Half
now, half Later.”
Shocked Mrs. Aradhana
rejected to pay the bribe to
the tehsildar and left from
his office. But the
complainant was helpless
as she wanted that tender.
Again the next day she
arrived the tehsildar office
but had to wait for hours to
meet the tehsildar but he
did not met her or heard
her as he wanted the bribe.

After two weeks the


complainant was helpless
and she contacted the
tehsildar, he picked up the
call and again demanded
for the bribe of 20 lakh
rupees but this time the
complainant secretly
recorded the conversation.
Instead of Paying, she
kept the evidence
carefully.
APPLICATION TO THE HONORABLE LOKAYUKTA

To,

The Honorable Lok Ayukta

Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar,

Lucknow

Uttar Pradesh

226010

Date- 16/09/2025

Subject- Application to Honorable Lok Ayukta for Complaint u/s 9

Respected Lok Ayukta,

In the light of facts stated and complaint form filled above, it is most humbly
submitted that the Honorable Lok Ayukta may be pleased to order-

Appropriate action against the official

Immediate suspension and Investigation

Audit and Review

Legal Proceedings

Implement Safeguards
Your humbly,

Aradhana Sharma

Nanda Nagar, Gorakhpur Airport

Gorakhpur

Uttar Pradesh

AFFIDAVIT

I, Aradhana Sharma D/O of Mr. Dinesh Sharma resident of Nanda Nagar,


Gorakhpur Airport, do hereby solemnly declare and affirm on oath as under,

1. That I am a Contractor under Sadar Tehsil in Nanda Nagar, Gorakhpur.


2. My documents were legally verified , yet the file didn’t move for weeks after
applying for a government road tender worth 2.5 crore rupees.
3. When I visited tehsildar’s office, who casually said “If you want your file
cleared, arrange 20 lakh rupees”.
4. I rejected to pay the bribe but after some time when I was helpless, I again
tried to contact him, he picked up call and again demanded for the bribe of
20 lakh rupees. I even wrote application to explain the same to honourable
Mr. Krishna Chaudhary but no response was received regarding written
application.
Place: Gorakhpur Signature
Date:

AFFIDAVIT

I, Rohit Sharma S/O of Mr. Gurunath Sharma resident of Shalimar Paradise,

Betiahata Gorakhpur , do hereby solemnly declare and affirm on oath as under,

1. That I am a Builder of Erays Enterprise, Taramandal Gorakhpur

2. I was present when Aradhana submit her documents under sadar tehsil in

Nanda Nagar,Gorakhpur.
3. I witness that he didn’t take a look over her legally verified documents for

weeks and when she visited again the tehsildar’s office and he demanded 20

lakh rupees as bribe.

4. I saw Aradhana writing the application and explaining the same to Mr. Krisnha

Chaudhary, Assistant Superintendent of Police, Gorakhpur but no response was

received regarding the written Application.


,
Application to Assistant Superintendent of Police

To,
The Honorable Assistant Superintendent of Police,
Mr. Krishna Chaudhary,
Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh
Date:
Subject: Urgent complaint against Sadar Tehsil for demanding a bribe of 20 lakh
rupees
Respected Sir,
I, Aradhana Sharma, a contractor of Urban Contruction, Nanda Nagar, Gorakhpur
wish to bring your immediate attention a misuse of power and corrupt motive of Mr.
Anuj Sethi, Sadar Tehsil of Nanda Nagar, Gorakhpur.
Mr. Anuj Sethi has demanded a bribe of 20 lakh rupees in order to pass my tender
which is clear violation of Section 7 of Preventive Corruption Act, 1988. Alongwith
that he has also threatened me if I will not fulfil his demand of bribe, he would not
make it possible to pass my tender.
After his demand for bribe I immediately refused to give him the said amount and left
the tehsildar’s office, but as it was the matter of my work I went again to his office and
despite the submission of the legal verified documents he refused to meet me and
made me wait outside his office for two weeks on a daily basis. I request for
immediate strict legal actions and an impartial inquiry against sadar tehsil Mr. Anuj
Sethi .Furthermore, I request you to personally look into the matter and verify all my
legal dpcuments, and assure me that I would receive my tender project as soon as
possible.
This matter not only concerns the future and well being of all the citizens, but also the
trust of individuals is at stake. I trust that you will take swift and stern action to uphold
justice.

You might also like