Architecting Intelligence: A

Comprehensive Guide to Prompt

Engineering and Advanced AI Systems
for PDF Document Interaction

Abstract: This report provides an exhaustive technical analysis of the principles and practices
required to build sophisticated AI systems for PDF document interaction. It begins by
establishing the foundational principles of advanced prompt engineering, including a
comparative analysis of prompting methodologies. It then deconstructs the unique challenges
posed by the PDF format and presents Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) as the
dominant architectural solution. A significant portion of this report is dedicated to a granular,
component-by-component breakdown of the RAG pipeline, offering data-driven
recommendations for document chunking, embedding model selection, and vector database
implementation. Finally, the report explores the frontiers of multimodal AI for comprehensive
document understanding and provides a series of practical, domain-specific prompt
engineering playbooks for high-value tasks.

Part I: The Foundations of Model Instruction

Section 1: Principles of Advanced Prompt Engineering

Effective communication with Large Language Models (LLMs) has evolved from simple
instructions into a systematic engineering practice. This discipline, known as prompt
engineering, combines a technical understanding of model behavior with a nuanced grasp of
natural language to guide generative AI toward optimal, reliable outputs.1 The principles are
generally categorized across five domains: Prompt Structure and Clarity, Specificity and
Information, User Interaction and Engagement, Content and Language Style, and Complex
Tasks.2

1.1 Deconstructing the Prompt: Core Components and Syntax

A well-architected prompt consists of several key components that work in concert to

condition the model's response. These include the instruction, which defines the task; the
primary content (or context), which is the data to be processed; examples, which provide a
template for the desired output (a technique known as in-context learning); and a cue, which
primes the model for a specific format.4

Empirical evidence and best practices from leading AI labs suggest that the placement of
these components is critical. Placing the primary instruction at the beginning of the prompt
generally produces higher-quality outputs.5 However, some models exhibit a recency bias,
meaning the information presented at the end of the prompt can have a more significant
influence. Therefore, a robust strategy involves repeating the core instruction at both the
beginning and the end of the prompt to reinforce the objective.5

Structuring the prompt with clear syntax is equally important for communicating intent and
ensuring the output is easily parsable. The use of delimiters, such as triple quotes ("""), triple
backticks (``````), hash marks (###), or XML tags (<tag>), is a fundamental technique for
separating instructions from the context or data being analyzed.2 Models have been trained
on vast quantities of web content, making them highly responsive to structured formats like
Markdown and XML, which can be used to delineate sections and improve the model's
comprehension of the prompt's logical flow.5

1.2 The Art of Specificity: Crafting Precise and Unambiguous Directives

The quality of an LLM's output is directly proportional to the clarity and specificity of its input.
Vague requests, such as "Summarize this document," are ineffective because they lack focus
and fail to provide the model with criteria for prioritization.9 An effective prompt must be as
detailed as possible about the desired context, outcome, length, format, and style.6 For
instance, an imprecise directive like "The description should be fairly short" is vastly improved
by a quantitative instruction such as "Use a 3 to 5 sentence paragraph to describe this
product".6

A core principle of effective instruction is the use of affirmative directives. It is more effective
to instruct the model on what to do rather than what not to do.2 For example, instead of a
negative constraint like "DO NOT ASK FOR A USERNAME," a more effective, affirmative
instruction is to provide a positive action: "Instead of asking for PII, such as username or
password, refer the user to the help article

www.samplewebsite.com/help/faq".6 This approach reduces ambiguity and the cognitive load

on the model, leading to more reliable and compliant behavior. This principle's prominence
has evolved; while it was a cornerstone of OpenAI's initial best practices, it is less emphasized
in more recent documentation, suggesting that newer models may be more adept at handling
negative constraints or that the principle is now considered foundational knowledge.2 This
evolution highlights that prompt engineering is an empirical discipline, requiring practitioners
to continuously test and validate strategies against specific model versions rather than
treating them as immutable laws.10

1.3 Cognitive Forcing Functions: Eliciting Advanced Reasoning

To move beyond simple retrieval and into complex reasoning, practitioners can employ
"cognitive forcing" techniques that compel the model to externalize its analytical process.

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) Prompting is one of the most powerful and widely validated
techniques in this domain.1 By including a simple leading phrase like "Let's think step-by-step"
or "Let's work this out in a step-by-step way to be sure we have the right answer," the model
is prompted to break down a complex problem into a sequence of intermediate reasoning
steps.5 This process of articulated reasoning significantly improves the accuracy and
coherence of the final answer, particularly for logical, mathematical, or multi-step inferential
tasks.11

Another advanced technique is Interactive Refinement, where the prompt empowers the
model to become an active participant in clarifying the user's request. By instructing the
model, "From now on, I would like you to ask me questions to elicit precise details and
requirements until you have enough information to provide the needed output," the user
initiates a collaborative dialogue.2 This allows the model to resolve ambiguities and gather
sufficient context before committing to a final output, a method heavily backed by research
and employed by sophisticated custom AI assistants.2

1.4 Comparative Analysis of Prompting Techniques: Zero-Shot, One-Shot, and

Few-Shot Learning
The level of guidance provided in a prompt can be categorized into three main techniques,
which form a spectrum from zero to extensive in-context learning. The selection of the
appropriate technique is a strategic decision based on task complexity and desired output
consistency.
●​ Zero-Shot Prompting: The model is given a direct instruction for a task without any
examples.1 It relies entirely on its pre-trained knowledge to generate a response. This
approach is efficient and effective for simple, common tasks like basic classification or
summarization of general topics.14 However, it often fails when the task is complex, novel,
or requires a specific output format, as the lack of examples can lead to unpredictable
results.14
●​ One-Shot and Few-Shot Prompting: These techniques are applications of In-Context
Learning (ICL), where one (one-shot) or multiple (few-shot) examples of the desired
input-output pattern are provided directly within the prompt.5 Few-shot prompting is
consistently more effective for complex tasks that demand adherence to a specific
format (e.g., generating JSON), pattern, or style.1 By observing the examples, the model
learns the desired behavior and generalizes it to the new input. The quality, consistency,
and diversity of the examples are critical; using examples that are too similar can lead to
overgeneralization, while inconsistent formatting can confuse the model.11

The following table provides a strategic framework for selecting the appropriate prompting
technique.

Technique Description Ideal Use Strengths Limitations

Cases

Zero-Shot The model is Simple, Simple, fast, Unreliable for

Prompting given an common tasks; and requires complex tasks;
instruction general minimal output format
with no queries; basic prompt is not
examples classification.14 engineering guaranteed.14
provided.12 effort.

One-Shot A single Tasks with Provides a A single

Prompting example is some clear target for example may
provided to ambiguity; the model, not be
guide the basic improving sufficient to
model's structured accuracy over capture
response.14 information zero-shot. complex
 extraction.14 patterns or
variations.

Few-Shot Multiple Complex tasks; High accuracy Limited by the

Prompting examples are structured and model's
provided to data extraction consistency; context
demonstrate (e.g., JSON); allows the window;
the desired nuanced model to learn requires
input-output classification; complex careful
pattern.14 tasks requiring patterns and selection of
precise formats.11 diverse and
formatting.14 consistent
examples.14

Zero-Shot The model is Arithmetic, Simple to Less effective

Chain-of-Tho instructed to commonsense, implement; than few-shot
ught (CoT) "think and symbolic significantly CoT for highly
step-by-step" reasoning improves complex or
without being tasks where reasoning novel
shown an the process is abilities on reasoning
example of a more complex paths.
reasoning important than problems.2
process.11 the format.11

Few-Shot The prompt Multi-step The most Requires

Chain-of-Tho includes logical powerful significant
ught (CoT) examples that problems; technique for effort to craft
demonstrate tasks requiring complex high-quality
both the complex reasoning; reasoning
reasoning inference and provides a examples;
steps and the explanation.11 clear template consumes
final answer.11 for the model more context
to follow.11 window space.

Part II: The Challenge and Solution for Document

Intelligence
Section 2: Deconstructing the PDF: Challenges in Machine
Comprehension

While ubiquitous, the Portable Document Format (PDF) presents a unique and significant set
of challenges for AI systems. The root of these challenges lies in the format's original design
purpose, which creates a fundamental conflict with the needs of machine comprehension.
This section diagnoses these issues, which are primarily data engineering challenges that
must be solved before any effective LLM interaction can occur.

2.1 The Unstructured Data Problem: A Conflict of Design

The PDF format was engineered to preserve the precise visual fidelity of a printed document
across different platforms and devices, not to encode its logical or semantic structure.15 This
design choice is the primary source of difficulty for AI. To an AI system that thrives on
structured, machine-readable data, a typical PDF is an opaque, unstructured object, akin to a
"jumbled book without any chapters, paragraphs, or headings".16

This lack of inherent structure leads directly to high rates of data extraction inaccuracy.17
Without explicit tags or metadata, an AI cannot reliably differentiate between a heading, a
paragraph, a caption, or a footer. This ambiguity forces AI systems to rely on heuristics and
visual analysis, which are often brittle and prone to error, especially when faced with the vast
diversity of document layouts found in the real world.18

2.2 Navigating Complex Layouts, Tables, and Visual Elements

The visual complexity of many PDFs further exacerbates the unstructured data problem.
●​ Tables and Forms: Accurately parsing tabular data is a notorious challenge. Standard
text extraction methods often fail to preserve the relational structure of rows and
columns, resulting in a jumbled stream of text that is useless for analysis.18 Multi-page
tables, nested tables, and merged cells add further layers of complexity that can break all
but the most sophisticated parsing tools.16
●​ Scanned Documents and Handwriting: A significant portion of PDFs in business
 workflows are not digitally native but are scanned images of physical documents. These
require Optical Character Recognition (OCR) to convert the image of text into
machine-readable characters.20 OCR introduces a potential for errors, particularly with
low-resolution scans, complex fonts, or handwritten annotations, which demand
specialized handwriting recognition models to achieve viable accuracy.17
●​ Non-Textual Information: Crucially, a great deal of information in technical manuals,
financial reports, and scientific papers is conveyed through non-textual elements like
images, charts, and diagrams. A standard text extraction pipeline will either ignore this
information entirely or extract only a caption, leading to an incomplete and potentially
misleading understanding of the document's full content.20

2.3 Data Integrity and Operational Hurdles

Beyond the parsing challenges, building a reliable AI system for PDFs involves significant
operational considerations. The paramount concern is maintaining data quality. Inaccurate
data extracted from a source document can propagate silently through downstream business
processes, leading to flawed analysis and poor decision-making.17 This necessitates a robust
data pipeline that includes pre-processing steps to clean and normalize text, as well as
post-extraction validation workflows to verify accuracy.18

Furthermore, scaling a PDF processing solution to handle large volumes of documents

introduces engineering challenges related to data storage, processing throughput, and
integration with existing enterprise systems. Without a well-designed architecture,
organizations risk creating data silos and inefficient, disconnected workflows.17 The
conclusion is inescapable: making AI work effectively with PDFs is less about finding a "magic
prompt" and more about solving the upstream data engineering problem of reliably
converting the unstructured visual information in a PDF into a structured, machine-readable
format.

Section 3: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): The Dominant

Architectural Paradigm

To overcome the inherent limitations of LLMs—namely, their static knowledge base and their
inability to access private, real-time information—a powerful architectural pattern has
emerged as the industry standard: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). RAG
fundamentally transforms how LLMs interact with external data sources like a corpus of PDF
documents.

3.1 Conceptual Framework: Augmenting LLMs with External Knowledge

RAG is a technique that enhances an LLM's capabilities by retrieving relevant information from
an external knowledge source before the model generates a response.22 This process
effectively grounds the LLM in a specific, curated set of information—such as internal
company documents, recent news articles, or technical manuals—that was not part of its
original, static training data.23

This approach can be conceptualized as providing the model with a "tailored textbook" or
allowing it to perform an "open-book exam" for every query.24 Instead of relying on its vast but
potentially outdated or generic memorized knowledge, the LLM is given a small, highly
relevant set of facts to work with, dramatically improving the accuracy and relevance of its
output. This shift fundamentally changes the role of the LLM in an enterprise context. It is no
longer treated as a "know-it-all" oracle but is instead leveraged as an "expert synthesizer." Its
primary task becomes reasoning over and synthesizing the specific, verifiable information
provided in the prompt, rather than recalling information from its opaque training data. This
has profound implications for building trustworthy and secure AI systems, as it allows
organizations to apply the powerful reasoning capabilities of LLMs to their own private,
proprietary data without exposing that data during model training.16

3.2 The Three Pillars of RAG: Indexing, Retrieval, and Generation

The RAG process can be broken down into three distinct stages:
1.​ Indexing (Offline): In this preparatory phase, the corpus of external documents (e.g.,
PDFs) is processed. The documents are loaded, cleaned, and segmented into smaller,
manageable chunks. Each chunk is then passed through an embedding model, which
converts the text into a high-dimensional numerical vector. These vectors, or
"embeddings," capture the semantic meaning of the text. Finally, these embeddings are
stored in a specialized vector database, creating a searchable index of the entire
knowledge corpus.23
2.​ Retrieval (Real-time): When a user submits a query, the RAG system first converts the
query itself into an embedding using the same model. It then uses this query embedding
to search the vector database, identifying the document chunks whose embeddings are
most semantically similar (i.e., closest in the vector space) to the query's embedding.23
 The top-k most relevant chunks are retrieved.
3.​ Generation (Real-time): The retrieved document chunks, which serve as the "context,"
are then combined with the original user query. This augmented prompt is fed to the
LLM, which generates a final response based only on the provided information. The
prompt might look something like: "Using the following context, answer the user's
question. Context:. Question: [User Query].".23

3.3 Benefits and Inherent Limitations

The adoption of the RAG architecture offers significant advantages. Its primary benefit is a
dramatic reduction in factual inaccuracies and "hallucinations," as the model's responses are
grounded in verifiable source material.23 It enables the use of up-to-date or domain-specific
information without incurring the immense computational and financial costs of retraining or
fine-tuning the entire LLM.23 Furthermore, because the system knows which specific chunks
were used to generate an answer, it can provide citations, allowing users to verify the
information and increasing trust in the system.23

However, RAG is not a perfect solution. Its effectiveness is critically dependent on the quality
of the retrieval step. If irrelevant or low-quality documents are retrieved, the LLM will produce
a poor answer, following the "garbage in, garbage out" principle. Additionally, the LLM can still
misinterpret the provided context or "hallucinate" around the facts if the source material is
ambiguous, internally contradictory, or complex.23

Part III: Engineering a Production-Grade RAG Pipeline

for PDFs

Building a robust RAG pipeline requires careful engineering of each component. This section
provides a technical deep dive into the key stages of a RAG pipeline for PDFs, offering a
decision-making framework for practitioners.

Section 4: Ingestion and Preprocessing: Strategic Document

Chunking
The ingestion and chunking stage is the foundation of any RAG application. The strategy used
to parse and segment documents directly impacts the quality of retrieval and, consequently,
the accuracy of the final generated response.20 A monolithic chunking strategy is
fundamentally flawed for complex documents like PDFs, which are composite objects
containing diverse elements.

4.1 A Taxonomy of Chunking Strategies

Chunking strategies exist on a spectrum of complexity and effectiveness:

●​ Level 1: Fixed-Size Chunking: This is the most basic method, splitting text into
segments of a fixed character or token count.26 While simple to implement, it disregards
the semantic structure of the text and often creates incoherent chunks by splitting
sentences or paragraphs midway.
●​ Level 2: Recursive Chunking: This is a more intelligent approach that attempts to split
text along a hierarchy of semantic separators, such as double newlines (paragraphs),
single newlines, and then spaces.26 It is a strong baseline that better respects the natural
structure of a document and is a default in many frameworks like LangChain.29
●​ Level 3: Document-Specific Chunking: This strategy leverages the inherent structure
of a document format, such as splitting a Markdown file by its headers.26 This is highly
effective but less applicable to the visually-defined structure of most PDFs.
●​ Level 4: Semantic Chunking: This advanced method uses embedding models to analyze
the semantic relationship between sentences. It splits the text at points where the topic
shifts, ensuring that each chunk is conceptually coherent and self-contained.26
●​ Level 5: Agentic Chunking: This is the most sophisticated strategy, in which an LLM is
used to intelligently determine the optimal chunk boundaries based on the content,
potentially creating a hierarchical summary of the document or extracting standalone
propositions.26

4.2 Advanced Techniques for Tables and Complex Layouts

Naive, text-based chunking strategies are notoriously poor at handling the structured data
within tables. They often fragment the relational structure between rows and columns, leading
to nonsensical retrieved contexts.33
The state-of-the-art solution is to adopt an element-aware, hybrid pipeline. This process
begins not with text splitting, but with Document Layout Analysis (DLA). A vision-capable
model (such as LayoutLM, or services like Azure Document Intelligence and LlamaParse) is
used to first identify and classify the structural elements on each page—distinguishing
between paragraphs, titles, lists, and tables.19

Once identified, these elements are routed to specialized processors. Textual elements like
paragraphs can be chunked using recursive or semantic strategies. In contrast, entire tables
should be preserved as a single, atomic "chunk." The table is often converted into a structured
format like Markdown, JSON, or CSV and stored with rich metadata linking it back to its
original page number and surrounding textual context.19 This hybrid storage strategy ensures
that when a query pertains to tabular data, the entire, intact table is retrieved, preserving its
critical structure for the LLM to analyze.

4.3 Recommendations for Optimal Chunk Size and Overlap

The choice of chunk size involves a critical trade-off. Smaller chunks (e.g., 100-256 tokens)
lead to more precise, targeted retrieval and less noise in the LLM's context window, but they
risk losing important surrounding context. Larger chunks (e.g., 512-1024 tokens) retain more
context but can dilute the relevance of the retrieved information and be less computationally
efficient.35

To mitigate the risk of splitting key information across chunk boundaries, implementing an
overlap between sequential chunks is a crucial best practice. Reusing the last few sentences
or a fixed number of tokens from chunk N at the beginning of chunk N+1 helps maintain
contextual continuity.34

An advanced retrieval strategy known as Small-to-Large or Parent Document Retrieval

offers a compelling solution to the size-versus-context dilemma. In this approach, small,
granular chunks are indexed to ensure high-precision semantic search. However, once the
most relevant small chunk is identified, the system retrieves the larger "parent" document that
contains it (e.g., the full page or section). This larger parent chunk is then passed to the LLM,
providing it with the broad context needed for high-quality generation while still benefiting
from the precision of small-chunk retrieval.31

Section 5: Vectorization: Selecting the Optimal Embedding Model

The embedding model is the heart of the RAG system's retrieval capability. Its function is to
translate the semantic meaning of text into a mathematical representation, enabling the
system to move beyond simple keyword matching to true conceptual understanding.34 The
choice of model is a strategic decision with cascading effects on the entire RAG architecture,
influencing everything from chunking strategy to infrastructure costs.

5.1 The Role of Embeddings in Semantic Retrieval

Embedding models are neural networks that convert text into high-dimensional vectors. This
process maps text passages with similar meanings to nearby points in a geometric space. This
allows the RAG system to retrieve documents based on conceptual similarity; for example, a
query for "rules for freelancers" can successfully retrieve a chunk about "policies for
independent contractors" because their vector representations will be close to each other.34
For scalable RAG systems, bi-encoder models are the standard, as they efficiently create
embeddings for documents and queries independently, allowing the document embeddings
to be pre-computed and stored.41

5.2 Market Analysis: A Comparative Review of Leading Embedding Models for

2025

The market for embedding models is diverse, comprising both proprietary, API-based models
and powerful open-source alternatives. Performance is often evaluated using benchmarks like
the Massive Text Embedding Benchmark (MTEB), which assesses models on various retrieval
tasks.41

The selection of an embedding model is not made in a vacuum. A model's maximum token
limit directly constrains the maximum chunk size that can be used. For instance, a model with
a 32,000-token context window like Voyage AI allows for much larger, context-rich chunks
than a model with a smaller window.43 Similarly, the model's output vector dimensionality (e.g.,
1024 vs 3072 dimensions) directly impacts storage costs and retrieval latency in the vector
database.42 Therefore, the choice of model, chunking strategy, and vector database are
interdependent architectural decisions.

The following table provides a data-driven comparison of leading embedding models to guide
this selection process.
Model Model Key Max Output Pricing Ideal Use
Provider Name(s) Characte Tokens Dimensio (per 1M Case
ristics ns tokens)

OpenAI text-emb High 8,192 1,536 - $0.02 - General

edding-3 performa 3,072 $0.13 purpose,
-large, nce, high-qual
-small adjustabl ity
e productio
dimensio n
ns, systems.
strong
ecosyste
m.43

Voyage voyage-3 Top-tier 32,000 1,024 ~$0.18 Demandi

AI -large, performa (flexible) ng
voyage-l nce, very applicati
aw-2 long ons,
context, legal/fina
domain-s ncial
pecific domains,
models.43 long
documen
ts.

Google gemini-e High 2,048+ 768 - Free Tier Prototypi

(Gemini) mbeddin quality, 3,072 + Paid ng,
g-001 adjustabl integratio
e n with
dimensio Google
ns, Cloud
generous ecosyste
free m.
tier.43

Cohere embed- Strong 512 1,024 ~$0.12 Multilingu

multilingu multilingu al
al-v3.0 al applicati
support, ons,
enterpris enterpris
 e-focuse e
d.43 deploym
ents.

BGE bge-m3, Top-perf Varies 768 - Free / High-perf

(BAAI) bge-larg orming 1,024 Self-Host ormance
e-en-v1.5 open-sou ed systems
rce, with data
excellent privacy
multilingu requirem
al ents.
capabiliti
es.42

E5 e5-mistra Enterpris Varies 1,024 - Free / On-premi

(Microso l-7b-instr e-quality 4,096 Self-Host se
ft) uct open-sou ed enterpris
rce e
models systems
for local requiring
deploym full
ent.42 control.

Jina AI jina-emb Specializ 8,192 1,024 Free Tier RAG

eddings- ed for (flexible) + Paid systems
v2-base- long processin
en documen g lengthy,
ts, large complex
context documen
window.42 ts.

5.3 A Decision-Making Framework: Performance vs. Cost vs. Control

The choice of an embedding model involves a trade-off between three key factors:
●​ Performance: The model's accuracy on retrieval benchmarks and its suitability for the
specific domain.
●​ Cost: The combination of API fees for proprietary models and the
computational/infrastructure costs for self-hosting open-source models.
 ●​ Control: The level of data privacy, customization, and freedom from vendor lock-in.

For maximum performance and ease of use, proprietary APIs from providers like Voyage AI
and OpenAI are strong choices. For applications where data privacy, cost control, and the
ability to fine-tune are paramount, self-hosting high-performance open-source models like
BGE or E5 is the superior strategy. For organizations already embedded in a major cloud
ecosystem, native solutions like AWS Titan or Google Gemini embeddings offer seamless
integration and simplified billing.43

Section 6: Indexing and Storage: Choosing the Right Vector Database

The vector database is the specialized infrastructure responsible for storing the document
embeddings and executing high-speed similarity searches. The selection of this component is
a key strategic decision, as the market is bifurcating into two main categories: specialized
"pure-play" vector databases and "integrated" solutions that add vector capabilities to
existing, popular databases.

6.1 Core Functionality: Beyond Simple Storage

Vector databases are purpose-built to manage and query high-dimensional vector data.46
Unlike traditional relational databases that search for exact matches, vector databases use
Approximate Nearest Neighbor (ANN) algorithms (such as HNSW) to efficiently find the most
similar vectors in a massive dataset.46

Key features essential for production-grade RAG applications include:

●​ Scalability: The ability to handle billions of vectors without performance degradation.48
●​ Low-Latency Search: Returning search results in milliseconds to ensure a responsive
user experience.46
●​ Metadata Filtering: The ability to combine semantic search with filtering on structured
metadata (e.g., "find documents about 'liability' created after '2023-01-01'"). This is a
critical feature for building powerful applications.49
●​ Hybrid Search: The capability to combine traditional keyword-based search (like BM25)
with vector-based semantic search to get the best of both worlds.49
6.2 Comparative Analysis of Top Vector Databases for RAG Applications

The choice between a "pure-play" and an "integrated" solution is a strategic one. Pure-play
databases offer cutting-edge performance and features optimized for vector workloads.
Integrated solutions offer a simplified tech stack, reduced operational overhead, and the
ability to combine vector search with other database operations in a single system.44

The following table compares leading vector database solutions to aid in this architectural
decision.

Database Deployment License Key Features Ideal Use Case

Name Model / Scale

Pinecone Managed Proprietary Ease of use, Production-re

serverless ady
scaling, applications
low-latency, requiring high
hybrid performance
search.46 with minimal
operational
overhead.

Weaviate Managed / Open-Source GraphQL API, Sophisticated

Self-Hosted (BSD-3-Clause built-in RAG systems
) vectorization, with complex
strong hybrid data schemas
search, and
multi-modal multi-modal
support.46 requirements.

Milvus / Zilliz Managed / Open-Source Massive Large-scale

Self-Hosted (Apache 2.0) scalability enterprise
(billions of deployments
vectors), with
tunable demanding
consistency, performance
multiple index and scalability
types.48 needs.
 Qdrant Managed / Open-Source Advanced Performance-c
Self-Hosted (Apache 2.0) filtering, ritical
quantization, applications
resource-effici where
ent (written in advanced
Rust).44 filtering and
resource
tuning are
important.

Chroma Self-Hosted Open-Source Developer-frie Rapid

(Apache 2.0) ndly, simple prototyping,
API, deep research, and
integration smaller-scale
with applications.
LangChain/Lla
maIndex.46

MongoDB Managed Proprietary Integrated Teams already

Atlas solution; store using
vectors MongoDB
alongside looking to add
application RAG
data in capabilities
MongoDB.44 without a new
database.

pgvector Self-Hosted Open-Source PostgreSQL Teams heavily

(PostgreSQL) extension; invested in
leverage PostgreSQL
existing SQL seeking a
infrastructure simplified,
and integrated
expertise.46 vector search
solution.

6.3 Architectural Considerations: Scalability, Cost, and Developer Experience

The final selection of a vector database should be guided by a holistic assessment of project
needs 44:
●​ Performance and Scale: How large will the dataset grow? What are the latency and
throughput requirements?
●​ Cost Model: Does a usage-based, resource-based, or storage-based pricing model best
fit the budget?
●​ Operational Model: Is a fully managed service preferred, or does the team have the
expertise to self-host an open-source solution?
●​ Developer Experience: How robust are the SDKs, documentation, and community
support?

For rapid development, Pinecone and Chroma are excellent choices. For performance-critical
enterprise systems, Milvus and Weaviate are strong contenders. For teams looking to leverage
existing infrastructure, MongoDB Atlas and pgvector offer a compelling, integrated path.48

Part IV: Advanced Frontiers and Practical Applications

Section 7: Beyond Text: Multimodal AI for Comprehensive Document

Understanding

The next frontier in document intelligence moves beyond text-only analysis to create systems
that can holistically understand and reason over all the information within a document,
including images, charts, and diagrams. This requires a paradigm shift from text retrieval to
true concept retrieval, enabled by the rise of powerful multimodal AI models.

7.1 Integrating Visual Intelligence: Processing Images, Charts, and Diagrams

Many complex documents, such as scientific papers and financial reports, convey essential
information through visual elements. A text-only RAG system is blind to this information,
leading to an incomplete understanding.20 Multimodal AI, which can process and integrate
diverse data types like text and images simultaneously, is the key to unlocking a
comprehensive analysis of these documents.51 The development of foundation models like
Google's Gemini and OpenAI's GPT-4o, which can natively accept and reason about images
within a prompt, has made this new class of applications possible.52

7.2 Architectural Deep Dive: The MuDoC System as a Case Study

The MuDoC (Multimodal Document-grounded Conversational AI) system provides a

concrete architectural blueprint for the next generation of RAG.25 Built on GPT-4o, MuDoC
generates conversational responses that interleave text and figures retrieved directly from a
source PDF.

MuDoC's architecture showcases a sophisticated, multimodal ingestion pipeline:

1.​ Document Layout Analysis (DLA): The process begins with a computer vision model
(Mask R-CNN trained on the PubLayNet dataset) that analyzes each page of a PDF to
identify and classify distinct regions as text, title, list, table, or figure.25
2.​ Hybrid Indexing: This classification allows for a hybrid indexing strategy. Textual content
is extracted via OCR and indexed for semantic text retrieval. The identified figures are
extracted and stored as image snippets, which are then indexed for visual retrieval.25
3.​ Multimodal Retrieval and Generation: When a user asks a question, MuDoC performs
a search across both the text and image indexes to retrieve the most relevant text chunks
and image snippets. This collection of multimodal evidence is then passed together in
the prompt to GPT-4o, which can synthesize a response that both describes the
information textually and displays the relevant figures directly.25

A critical feature of MuDoC is its focus on trust and verifiability. The user interface allows a
user to click on any piece of text or any image in the AI's response and be instantly navigated
to the exact source location in the original PDF document. This seamless source attribution
dramatically increases user trust and allows for easy fact-checking, which is essential for
applications in education, research, and enterprise knowledge management.25

7.3 The Future of Document AI: Agentic Workflows and Automated Reasoning

The evolution of RAG is moving towards more autonomous, agentic systems. Instead of a
single retrieval-generation loop, an AI "agent" can perform multi-step reasoning over
document content. This involves the LLM autonomously deciding when and how to use tools,
such as performing multiple, iterative searches to gather comprehensive information,
synthesizing data from different sections or even different documents, and using a code
interpreter to perform calculations on data extracted from a retrieved table.13 This "Agentic
RAG" approach promises to handle much more complex queries that require synthesis and
analysis rather than simple fact retrieval.

Section 8: Applied Prompt Engineering for High-Value PDF Tasks

This final section provides a practical playbook of advanced prompt templates, synthesizing
the principles discussed throughout this report. The most effective prompts for complex
extraction are not monolithic; they are decomposed, highly structured, and treat the LLM as a
programmable function with a defined input and output schema. This approach dramatically
increases reliability and makes the output programmatically parsable, which is essential for
integration into automated workflows.

The following table presents ready-to-use prompt templates for high-value, real-world tasks.

Use Case Prompt Template Key Techniques Explanation of Why

Utilized It Works

Extracting Invoice <prompt> You are Role Assignment, By providing a clear

Data to JSON an expert data Zero-Shot, Explicit role, a direct
extraction Schema Definition, instruction, and a
assistant. Your task Output Priming precise JSON
is to extract schema, the
information from prompt leaves no
the provided room for ambiguity.
invoice text and It transforms the
format it as a valid extraction task into
JSON object a structured
according to the "form-filling"
schema below. If a exercise for the
value is not found, LLM, ensuring high
use a JSON null accuracy and a
value. **JSON consistently
Schema:** { parsable output.4
"invoice_id":
"string",
"invoice_date":
"string
(YYYY-MM-DD)",
 "vendor_name":
"string",
"customer_name":
"string",
"total_amount":
"number",
"line_items": [ {
"description":
"string", "quantity":
"number",
"unit_price":
"number" } ] }
**Invoice Text:** """
[Paste invoice text
here] """ **JSON
Output:**

Summarizing a <prompt> Your task Role Assignment, This prompt breaks

Scientific Paper is to act as a Task the complex task of
research assistant Decomposition, "summarizing" into
and provide a Specificity, Output four smaller,
structured Priming well-defined
summary of the sub-tasks. By
following scientific asking for specific
paper. Analyze the components of a
text and organize research paper, it
your summary into forces the model to
these specific analyze the
sections: 1. document's
**Research structure and
Question:** What is content deeply,
the primary resulting in a more
question or insightful and
hypothesis the useful summary
authors are than a generic
investigating? 2. request.62
**Methodology:**
Briefly describe the
experimental
design,
participants, and
key methods used
 for data collection
and analysis. 3.
**Key Findings:**
List the 3-5 most
significant results
of the study,
including
quantitative data
where possible. 4.
**Conclusions &
Implications:**
What are the main
conclusions drawn
by the authors, and
what are the
broader
implications for the
field? **Paper
Text:** """ [Paste
paper abstract or
full text here] """
**Structured
Summary:**

Identifying <prompt> You are a Role Assignment, This prompt uses a

Research Gaps critical research Chain-of-Thought clear, step-by-step
analyst. Your goal is (CoT), Task instruction (a form
to identify potential Decomposition of CoT) to guide
research gaps and the LLM through a
limitations based complex analytical
on the provided process. It moves
scientific paper. beyond simple
Please follow these summarization to
steps: 1. **Identify critical evaluation
Stated and creative
Limitations:** First, ideation, eliciting a
carefully read the higher level of
'Discussion' and reasoning from the
'Conclusion' model and
sections and producing a more
extract any valuable,
limitations explicitly
 mentioned by the actionable output.9
authors. 2.
**Critically Evaluate
Methodology:**
Second, analyze
the paper's
methodology. Are
there any potential
weaknesses in the
study design,
sample size, or
statistical analysis
that the authors did
not mention? 3.
**Propose Future
Research:** Third,
based on the
limitations you
identified, propose
three specific and
actionable research
questions that
could address
these gaps in
future studies.
**Paper Text:** """
[Paste paper text
here] """
**Analysis:**

Analyzing a Legal <prompt> You are a Role Assignment, This prompt

Clause legal analyst AI. Chained Prompts, decomposes the
From the provided Specificity, analysis of a legal
contract text, Structured Output document into a
extract and analyze chain of discrete,
the 'Limitation of logical steps: find,
Liability' clause. 1. simplify, and
**Extraction:** structure. By
First, locate and requesting the final
extract the full, output in a
verbatim text of the Markdown table, it
'Limitation of forces the model to
 Liability' clause. 2. extract and
**Summarization:** organize the critical
Next, summarize information (liability
the key terms of caps) in a clear,
this clause in structured, and
simple, easily comparable
easy-to-understan format, reducing
d language. 3. the risk of
**Entity misinterpretation.65
Obligations:**
Finally, create a
Markdown table
that identifies the
specific liability
caps and
exclusions for each
party mentioned in
the clause.
**Contract Text:**
""" [Paste contract
text here] """
**Clause
Analysis:**

Conclusion

The effective application of artificial intelligence to PDF documents is not a matter of a single
tool or technique, but rather the systematic engineering of a complete data processing and
interaction architecture. This report has demonstrated that success hinges on two core
pillars: sophisticated prompt engineering and the robust implementation of a
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipeline.

Advanced prompt engineering is a discipline of precision, clarity, and structure. The most
effective interactions are achieved not through conversational ambiguity, but through
well-defined prompts that assign roles, decompose complex tasks, provide clear examples,
and specify exact output formats. Techniques like Chain-of-Thought prompting are essential
for eliciting the advanced reasoning capabilities of modern LLMs.

For the unique challenges posed by PDFs, RAG has emerged as the dominant architectural
paradigm. It transforms the LLM from an unreliable oracle into a secure and powerful
reasoning engine that synthesizes answers from a curated, verifiable knowledge base.
However, a production-grade RAG system is far more than a simple script. Its success is
disproportionately dependent on a sophisticated, element-aware ingestion pipeline that can
intelligently parse the diverse components of a PDF—treating text, tables, and visual elements
as distinct objects requiring specialized processing and chunking strategies.

The selection of a RAG pipeline's components—the chunking strategy, the embedding model,
and the vector database—are not isolated choices but deeply interdependent architectural
decisions. The practitioner must consider the trade-offs between performance, cost, and
control in a holistic manner.

Finally, the future of document intelligence is unequivocally multimodal. Systems like MuDoC,
which can retrieve and reason over both text and images, represent the next frontier. By
building systems that can understand the entirety of a document's content and provide
interactive, verifiable responses, we can create AI tools that are not only more capable but
also fundamentally more trustworthy. For the practitioner, mastering these interconnected
domains—from the nuance of a single prompt to the architecture of a multimodal RAG
pipeline—is the key to unlocking the full potential of AI for document understanding.

Alıntılanan çalışmalar

1.​ What Is Prompt Engineering? | IBM, erişim tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/prompt-engineering
2.​ 26 Prompt Engineering Principles for 2024 | by Dan Cleary | Medium, erişim tarihi
Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://medium.com/@dan_43009/26-prompt-engineering-principles-for-2024-7
75099ddfe94
3.​ Prompt Engineering Principles for 2024 - PromptHub, erişim tarihi Ağustos 16,
2025, https://www.prompthub.us/blog/prompt-engineering-principles-for-2024
4.​ Introduction to Prompt Engineering for Data Professionals - Dataquest, erişim
tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://www.dataquest.io/blog/introduction-to-prompt-engineering-for-data-pro
fessionals/
5.​ Prompt engineering techniques - Azure OpenAI | Microsoft Learn, erişim tarihi
Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/ai-foundry/openai/concepts/prompt-engi
neering
6.​ Best practices for prompt engineering with the OpenAI API | OpenAI ..., erişim
tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://help.openai.com/en/articles/6654000-best-practices-for-prompt-enginee
ring-with-the-openai-api
7.​ Prompt engineering overview - Anthropic, erişim tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/build-with-claude/prompt-engineering/overvi
ew
8.​ General Tips for Designing Prompts | Prompt Engineering Guide, erişim tarihi
Ağustos 16, 2025, https://www.promptingguide.ai/introduction/tips
9.​ The 20 Best AskYourPDF Prompts to Get the Best Out of Your Documents, erişim
tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://askyourpdf.com/blog/the-20-best-askyourpdf-prompts
10.​Prompt engineering - OpenAI API, erişim tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/prompt-engineering
11.​ Chain of Thought Prompting Guide - PromptHub, erişim tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://www.prompthub.us/blog/chain-of-thought-prompting-guide
12.​What is zero-shot prompting? - IBM, erişim tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/zero-shot-prompting
13.​AI-Powered Analysis for PDFs, Books & Documents [Prompt] :
r/PromptEngineering - Reddit, erişim tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://www.reddit.com/r/PromptEngineering/comments/1i3coy5/aipowered_anal
ysis_for_pdfs_books_documents_prompt/
14.​Shot-Based Prompting: Zero-Shot, One-Shot, and Few-Shot Prompting, erişim
tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025, https://learnprompting.org/docs/basics/few_shot
15.​Parsing PDFs with LlamaParse: a how-to guide — LlamaIndex ..., erişim tarihi
Ağustos 16, 2025, https://www.llamaindex.ai/blog/pdf-parsing-llamaparse
16.​Enhancing AI Contextual Understanding with Properly Structured ..., erişim tarihi
Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://labs.appligent.com/appligent-labs/enhancing-ai-contextual-understanding
-with-properly-structured-pdf-documents?hsLang=en
17.​Overcoming common challenges in intelligent document processing - Indico
Data, erişim tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://indicodata.ai/blog/overcoming-common-challenges-in-intelligent-docum
ent-processing/
18.​Automated Data Extraction from PDF: Benefits and Challenges - Parsio, erişim
tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://parsio.io/blog/automated-data-extraction-from-pdf-benefits-and-challen
ges/
19.​RAG for Pdf with tables : r/LangChain - Reddit, erişim tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://www.reddit.com/r/LangChain/comments/18xp9xi/rag_for_pdf_with_tables/
20.​The RAG Engineer's Guide to Document Parsing : r/LangChain - Reddit, erişim
tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://www.reddit.com/r/LangChain/comments/1ef12q6/the_rag_engineers_guid
e_to_document_parsing/
21.​Document Automation with AI: Major Challenges & Opportunities - Provectus,
erişim tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://provectus.com/document-automation-with-ai-major-challenges-opportu
nities/
22.​en.wikipedia.org, erişim tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retrieval-augmented_generation#:~:text=Retrieval%
2Daugmented%20generation%20(RAG),LLM's%20pre%2Dexisting%20training%2
0data.
23.​Retrieval-augmented generation - Wikipedia, erişim tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retrieval-augmented_generation
24.​Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey - arXiv,
erişim tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2312.10997
25.​MuDoC: An Interactive Multimodal Document-grounded Conversational AI
System - arXiv, erişim tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2502.09843v1
26.​Five Levels of Chunking Strategies in RAG| Notes from Greg's Video | by Anurag
Mishra, erişim tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://medium.com/@anuragmishra_27746/five-levels-of-chunking-strategies-in
-rag-notes-from-gregs-video-7b735895694d
27.​Financial Report Chunking for Effective Retrieval Augmented Generation - arXiv,
erişim tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2402.05131v2
28.​Improving Retrieval for RAG based Question Answering Models on Financial
Documents - arXiv, erişim tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2404.07221
29.​Build a Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) App: Part 1 - LangChain.js, erişim
tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025, https://js.langchain.com/docs/tutorials/rag/
30.​Build Your Own Local PDF RAG Chatbot (Tutorial) - YouTube, erişim tarihi Ağustos
16, 2025, https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SXjfAIwbkZY
31.​Dive into Chunking Strategies for RAG with Zain - YouTube, erişim tarihi Ağustos
16, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LuhBgmwQeqw
32.​Advanced Chunking/Retrieving Strategies for Legal Documents : r/Rag - Reddit,
erişim tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://www.reddit.com/r/Rag/comments/1jdi4sg/advanced_chunkingretrieving_st
rategies_for_legal/
33.​Best Chunking Strategy for the Medical RAG System (Guidelines Docs) in PDFs -
Reddit, erişim tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://www.reddit.com/r/Rag/comments/1ljhksy/best_chunking_strategy_for_the_
medical_rag_system/
34.​How to Build a RAG Pipeline: Step-by-Step Guide - Multimodal, erişim tarihi
Ağustos 16, 2025, https://www.multimodal.dev/post/how-to-build-a-rag-pipeline
35.​Mastering Chunking Strategies for RAG: Best Practices & Code ..., erişim tarihi
Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://community.databricks.com/t5/technical-blog/the-ultimate-guide-to-chun
king-strategies-for-rag-applications/ba-p/113089
36.​Best RAG tools: Frameworks and Libraries in 2025 - Research AIMultiple, erişim
tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://research.aimultiple.com/retrieval-augmented-generation/
37.​How to Chunk Documents for RAG - Multimodal, erişim tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://www.multimodal.dev/post/how-to-chunk-documents-for-rag
38.​Chunking Strategies for RAG: Simplifying Complex Data Retrieval | by Kadam
Sayali, erişim tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://medium.com/@kadamsay06/chunking-strategies-for-rag-simplifying-com
plex-data-retrieval-1facc04f8303
39.​the chronicles of rag: the retriever, the chunk - arXiv, erişim tarihi Ağustos 16,
2025, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2401.07883
40.​How does LlamaIndex handle indexing of large documents (e.g., PDFs)? - Milvus,
erişim tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://milvus.io/ai-quick-reference/how-does-llamaindex-handle-indexing-of-lar
ge-documents-eg-pdfs
41.​How to Select the Best Embedding for RAG: A Comprehensive Guide | by Pankaj
Tiwari | Accredian | Medium, erişim tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://medium.com/accredian/how-to-select-the-best-embedding-for-rag-a-c
omprehensive-guide-16b63b407405
42.​Choosing the Best Embedding Models for RAG and Document Understanding -
Beam Cloud, erişim tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://www.beam.cloud/blog/best-embedding-models
43.​13 Best Embedding Models in 2025: OpenAI vs Voyage AI vs ..., erişim tarihi
Ağustos 16, 2025, https://elephas.app/blog/best-embedding-models
44.​Top Vector Database for RAG: Qdrant vs Weaviate vs Pinecone - Research
AIMultiple, erişim tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://research.aimultiple.com/vector-database-for-rag/
45.​Finding the Best Open-Source Embedding Model for RAG - TigerData, erişim
tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://www.tigerdata.com/blog/finding-the-best-open-source-embedding-mod
el-for-rag
46.​The 7 Best Vector Databases in 2025 | DataCamp, erişim tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://www.datacamp.com/blog/the-top-5-vector-databases
47.​Mastering RAG: Choosing the Perfect Vector Database - Galileo AI, erişim tarihi
Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://galileo.ai/blog/mastering-rag-choosing-the-perfect-vector-database
48.​Top 6 Vector Database Solutions for RAG Applications: 2025 - Azumo, erişim
tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://azumo.com/artificial-intelligence/ai-insights/top-vector-database-solution
s
49.​Top 5 Vector Databases to Use for RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) in
2025, erişim tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://apxml.com/posts/top-vector-databases-for-rag
50.​Optimizing RAG: A Guide to Choosing the Right Vector Database | by Mutahar Ali
- Medium, erişim tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://medium.com/@mutahar789/optimizing-rag-a-guide-to-choosing-the-righ
t-vector-database-480f71a33139
51.​What Is Multimodal AI? A Complete Introduction | Splunk, erişim tarihi Ağustos 16,
2025, https://www.splunk.com/en_us/blog/learn/multimodal-ai.html
52.​What is Multimodal AI? | IBM, erişim tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/multimodal-ai
53.​What is multimodal AI: Complete overview 2025 - SuperAnnotate, erişim tarihi
Ağustos 16, 2025, https://www.superannotate.com/blog/multimodal-ai
54.​Multimodal AI | Google Cloud, erişim tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://cloud.google.com/use-cases/multimodal-ai
55.​MuDoC: An Interactive Multimodal Document-grounded Conversational AI
 System | Request PDF - ResearchGate, erişim tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392170510_MuDoC_An_Interactive_Mu
ltimodal_Document-grounded_Conversational_AI_System
56.​MuDoC: An Interactive Multimodal Document-grounded Conversational AI
System - arXiv, erişim tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.09843
57.​[Literature Review] MuDoC: An Interactive Multimodal Document-grounded
Conversational AI System - Moonlight, erişim tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://www.themoonlight.io/en/review/mudoc-an-interactive-multimodal-docum
ent-grounded-conversational-ai-system
58.​Towards a Multimodal Document-grounded Conversational AI System for
Education - arXiv, erişim tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://arxiv.org/html/2504.13884v1
59.​Lessons from a Multimodal and Trustworthy AI System for Intelligent Textbooks,
erişim tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://intextbooks.science.uu.nl/workshop2025/files/iTextbooks2025_paper_8.pd
f
60.​Building a RAG Pipeline from Scratch with LangChain, Milvus & OpenAI: A
Step-by-Step Guide | by Ankita | Medium, erişim tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://medium.com/@admane.ankita/building-a-rag-pipeline-from-scratch-with
-langchain-milvus-openai-a-step-by-step-guide-986a7d857ff5
61.​A Step-by-Step Guide to Extracting Data from PDFs with ChatGPT, erişim tarihi
Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://airparser.com/blog/extract-data-from-pdfs-with-chatgpt/
62.​AI Prompts for Summarizing Reports: Save Time & Effort - PromptLayer, erişim
tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://blog.promptlayer.com/ai-prompts-for-summarizing-long-reports-quickly-
2/
63.​8 Ultimate ChatPDF Prompts: Chat with Any PDF Like ChatGPT - Academia
Insider, erişim tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://academiainsider.com/chatpdf-prompts/
64.​100 ChatGPT Prompts For Research - AskYourPDF, erişim tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://askyourpdf.com/blog/100-chatgpt-prompts-for-research
65.​Activities - Generative extractor - Good practices - UiPath Documentation Portal,
erişim tarihi Ağustos 16, 2025,
https://docs.uipath.com/activities/other/latest/document-understanding/generativ
e-prompts---good-practices
66.​How to Scrape Data from PDF using AI - Thunderbit, erişim tarihi Ağustos 16,
2025, https://thunderbit.com/blog/scrape-data-from-pdf-using-ai