Scribd
Upload
31 views1 page

21 July Order

The Supreme Court of India is hearing Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).6047/2025, related to a judgment from the High Court of Judicature at Madras. The court granted leave to appeal and ordered service of the appeal to the second respondent, who has not appeared despite being served. The case is scheduled to be re-listed in October 2025.

Uploaded by

MilanyPonnuram
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
31 views1 page

21 July Order

The Supreme Court of India is hearing Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).6047/2025, related to a judgment from the High Court of Judicature at Madras. The court granted leave to appeal and ordered service of the appeal to the second respondent, who has not appeared despite being served. The case is scheduled to be re-listed in October 2025.

Uploaded by

MilanyPonnuram
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

ITEM NO.42 COURT NO.

11 SECTION II-C

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).6047/2025

[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27-07-2023


in CRLOP(MD) No.1425/2022 passed by the High Court of Judicature at
Madras at Madurai]

P MILANY Petitioner

VERSUS

THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE & ANR. Respondents

(With I.A. No.86028/2025-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED


JUDGMENT)

Date : 21-07-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA


HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. ANJARIA

For Petitioner(s) :Mr. A. Velan, AOR


Ms. Navpreet Kaur, Adv.
Mr. Nilay Rai, Adv.
Mr. Prince Singh, Adv.
Mr. Tushar Gupta, Adv.

For Respondent(s) :Mr. Amit Anand Tiwari, Sr. A.A.G.


Mr. Sabarish Subramanian, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following


O R D E R

1. Despite service, respondent no.2 has not entered appearance.

2. Leave granted.

3. Service of lodgement of appeal be served on the respondent no.2.

4. Re-list the appeal in the month of October, 2025.

5. Dasti, in addition, is permitted.


Signature Not Verified

Digitally signed by
SWETA BALODI
Date: 2025.08.07
[Link] IST
(RASHMI DHYANI PANT)
Reason:
(SUDHIR KUMAR SHARMA)
ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)

You might also like