SARFAESI
SARFAESI
The SARFAESI ACT was formed in Dec.’ 2002 based on the recommendations of a) the
Committee on Banking Sector Reforms (Narasimham Committee Report II) and b) the
Restructuring of Weak Public Sector Banks (Verma Committee).
● Giving banks and financing companies a way to get their money back from
secured assets
the Indian government to tackle non-performing assets (NPAs) and facilitate asset
reconstruction. The act empowers banks and financial institutions to take action
against defaulting borrowers and recover their dues. Under the SARFAESI Act,
banks can enforce their security interests by seizing and selling the collateral without
court intervention. The act provides a quicker and more efficient process for
resolving bad loans and reducing the burden on the banking system. It has played a
significant role in strengthening the financial sector and improving debt recovery in
India.
The constitutional validity of the SARFAESI Act was challenged on several grounds,
including:
1. Violation of Article 14 (Equality before Law): Petitioners argued that the
Act created an unreasonable classification between secured and unsecured
creditors, granting excessive powers to the former without adequate
safeguards for borrowers. It was also contended that the Act treated different
types of borrowers and financial institutions unequally.
2. Violation of Article 19(1)(g) (Freedom to Practice any Profession, or to
Carry on any Occupation, Trade or Business): Borrowers contended that
the stringent provisions of the Act, allowing for the taking over and sale of
assets without court intervention, severely impacted their right to carry on their
business or profession.
3. Violation of Article 21 (Protection of Life and Personal Liberty): It was
argued that the Act's provisions could lead to the deprivation of property,
which is closely linked to the right to livelihood, without a fair and just
procedure, thus violating Article 21.
4. Encroachment on the Judicial Power: A significant challenge was that the
Act allowed secured creditors to take coercive actions without prior
adjudication by a court, thus allegedly encroaching upon the judicial powers
vested in the courts.
The Supreme Court has addressed these challenges in several key judgments,
firmly establishing the constitutional validity of the SARFAESI Act, albeit with some
clarifications and modifications. The most significant case in this regard is Mardia
Chemicals Ltd. & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. (2004) 4 SCC 311.
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the SARFAESI Act,
recognizing its objective to provide a speedy recovery mechanism for
Non-Performing Assets (NPAs) and ensure the financial stability of the country.
However, the Court struck down Section 17(2) of the Act, which mandated a
pre-deposit of 75% of the claimed amount before an appeal could be filed with the
Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT).
United Bank of India vs. Satyawati Tondon & Ors. (2010) 8 SCC 110: The Court
reiterated the object and purpose of the SARFAESI Act for speedy recovery and held
that High Courts should be circumspect in entertaining writ petitions against actions
taken under the Act, directing borrowers to avail the alternative remedy available
under Section 17 of the Act before the DRT.
Transcore vs. Union of India & Anr. (2008) 1 SCC 125: The Court held that the
SARFAESI Act and the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions
Act, 1993 (RDDB Act) are complementary to each other and provide alternative
remedies for debt recovery.
RBI's Registration Criteria: The RBI's criteria for granting registration are designed
to ensure that ARCs are financially sound and professionally managed. These
criteria include:
● Grounds for Cancellation: The RBI has the authority to cancel an ARC's
registration certificate under specific circumstances, including:
○ Cessation of Business: If an ARC voluntarily ceases its operations,
the RBI can cancel its registration.
○ Non-compliance: This covers a broad range of violations, including
failure to adhere to the conditions of registration, non-compliance with
RBI directives, and violations of the SARFAESI Act itself.
○ Conduct Detrimental to Public Interest: This is a broad clause that
allows the RBI to take action against ARCs whose activities are
deemed harmful to the financial system or the interests of
stakeholders.
○ Failure to Maintain Net Owned Funds (NOF): This is a critical
requirement. If an ARC's NOF falls below the minimum level prescribed
by the RBI, its registration can be cancelled.
● Opportunity to be Heard: A key principle of natural justice is enshrined in
this section. The RBI must give the ARC an opportunity to present its case
before cancelling its registration. This ensures fairness and prevents arbitrary
action.
● Fund Raising: ARCs need funds to finance their acquisition of NPAs. This
section allows them to raise these funds by issuing security receipts (SRs) to
qualified institutional buyers (QIBs).
● Nature of Security Receipts: SRs are essentially financial instruments that
represent an undivided interest in the acquired financial assets. Investors who
subscribe to SRs share in the risks and rewards associated with the recovery
of those assets.
● Qualified Institutional Buyers (QIBs): SRs can only be issued to QIBs,
which are sophisticated investors such as mutual funds, pension funds, and
insurance companies. This restriction is intended to protect the interests of
less sophisticated investors.
Section 12: Power of Reserve Bank to Determine Policy and Issue Directions:
● RBI's Broad Powers: This section grants the RBI extensive powers to
regulate the functioning of ARCs. These powers are essential for ensuring the
stability and soundness of the asset reconstruction industry.
● Specific Powers: The RBI can:
○ Determine the policies governing the acquisition, reconstruction, and
management of financial assets by ARCs.
○ Issue directions to ARCs on various matters, including the fees they
can charge, the expenses they can incur, and the interest rates they
can offer on SRs.
○ Specify the manner in which ARCs should disclose information to
investors and the public
Measures
Section 9(b): Sale or lease of part or whole of the borrower's business. This allows
ARCs to dispose of the borrower's assets to generate funds for repayment of the
debt.
Section 9(c): Rescheduling of debt payments. This involves restructuring the loan
terms to make them more manageable for the borrower.
Section 9(d): Enforcement of security interest (as per the Act). This is a key remedy
that allows ARCs to take possession and sell the secured assets.
Section 9(e): Settlement of dues. This enables ARCs to negotiate settlements with
borrowers, often involving a reduction in the total amount owed.
Section 9(g): Conversion of debt into shares of the borrower company. This allows
ARCs to become equity holders in the borrower company.
Section 13(1) clearly states to give secured creditors the power to enforce security
interests and recover dues from borrowers who default without court intervention.
Demand Notice (Section 13(2)) - A prior notice has to be issued to the borrower to
discharge his function within the period of sixty days.The notice must specify the
amount due, the secured assets involved, and the intention of the secured creditor to
exercise their rights under Section 13(4) if the borrower fails to repay.
Section 13(3) - pursuant to the case of Mardia Chemicals v. Union of India sec.
13(3)A) was added, which states, If, on receipt of the notice under sub-section (2),
the borrower makes any representation or raises any objection, the secured creditor
shall consider such representation or objection, and if the secured creditor comes to
the conclusion that such representation or objection is not acceptable or tenable, he
shall communicate [within fifteen days] .
Take Possession of Secured Assets (Section 13(4)(a)): The secured creditor can
take physical or symbolic possession of the secured assets.
Manage the Secured Assets (Section 13(4)(b)): This includes the right to lease,
assign, or sell the secured assets.
Appoint a Manager (Section 13(4)(c)): The secured creditor can appoint a manager
to manage the secured assets.
Issue Notice to Debtors of the Borrower (Section 13(4)(d)): The secured creditor can
require any person who has acquired secured assets from the borrower or owes
money to the borrower to pay the secured creditor directly.
● When the secured creditor takes over the management of the business of the
borrower under Section 13(4)(b), they have the power to carry on the
business or appoint a manager to do so.
● The secured creditor is not liable for any contracts entered into by the
borrower before the date of taking over management.
● This provision outlines the operational aspects when the secured creditor
chooses to manage the borrower's business as a means of recovering dues.
● Any person (including the borrower) aggrieved by any of the measures taken
by the secured creditor under Section 13(4) can make an application to the
Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) having jurisdiction within 45 days from the
date on which such measure was taken.
●
● The DRT examines whether the measures taken by the secured creditor are
in accordance with the provisions of the SARFAESI Act and the rules made
thereunder.
Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act specifically bars civil courts from entertaining any
suit or proceeding in respect of matters which a Debts Recovery Tribunal or an
Appellate Tribunal is empowered to determine. However, the bar is not absolute. As
clarified in Central Bank of India v. Smt. Prabha Jain & Ors. [2025 INSC 95], civil
courts retain jurisdiction to examine the validity of the underlying documents or
determine questions of title, which fall outside the purview of the DRT under Section
17
CENTRAL REGISTRY
CH – 4 {sec 20–26(A)}
The Central Registry under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets
and Enforcement of Security Interest (SARFAESI) Act, 2002, is a pivotal institution
established to bring transparency and prevent fraudulent practices in secured
lending.
(2) Head Office and Branch Offices: Section 20(2) states that the head office of the
Central Registry will be at a location specified by the Central Government. To
facilitate the registration of transactions, the central government is also authorized to
establish branch offices at other locations as deemed necessary. Currently, the head
office of CERSAI is in New Delhi.
(3) Territorial Limits: As per Section 20(3), the Central Government can, through
notification, define the territorial limits within which an office of the Central Registry
can exercise its functions. This allows for a structured and geographically defined
operational scope for the registry's offices, although the online nature of the registry
allows for nationwide access.
While Section 20 outlines the establishment of the registry, the specifics of the
registration process are detailed in the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial
Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest (Central Registry) Rules, 2011, and the
operational guidelines issued by CERSAI. Key aspects include:
(EXTRA CONTENT )
(3) Officers and Servants: Section 21(3) allows the Central Registrar to appoint
such number of officers and other employees as deemed necessary for the
discharge of their functions under the Act, with the approval of the Central
Government. These personnel assist the Central Registrar in managing the
day-to-day activities of the registry.
(1) Maintenance of Central Register: Section 22(1) mandates that a record called
the Central Register shall be kept at the head office of the Central Registry. This
register will contain the particulars of transactions relating to: * Securitisation of
financial assets. * Reconstruction of financial assets. * Creation of security interest.
(2) Electronic Maintenance: Section 22(2) allows the Central Registrar to maintain
the records wholly or partly in computer, floppies, diskettes, or any other electronic
form, subject to prescribed safeguards. This provision acknowledges the need for a
modern, digitalized system for efficient record-keeping.
(3) Electronic Record as Reference: Section 22(3) clarifies that where the register
is maintained electronically, any reference in the SARFAESI Act to an entry in the
Central Register shall be construed as a reference to the entry as maintained in the
electronic form. This ensures the legal validity of electronic records.
(4) Control and Management: Section 22(4) reiterates that the Central Register
shall be kept under the control and management of the Central Registrar.
(1) Obligation to File: Section 23(1) states that the particulars of every transaction
of securitisation, asset reconstruction, or creation of security interest shall be filed
with the Central Registrar in the prescribed manner and on payment of the specified
fee. The timeline for filing, initially 30 days, was removed by the Enforcement of
Security Interest and Recovery of Debts Laws (Amendment) Act, 2016, giving the
Central Government the power to prescribe the period by notification.
(3) Prescribing Forms and Fees: Section 23(3), also inserted by the 2016
Amendment Act, authorizes the Central Government to prescribe forms for
registration for different types of security interest and the fees to be charged for such
registration through rules. This provides the framework for the operational aspects of
registration.
(1) Public Inspection: Section 26(1) grants any person the right to inspect the
particulars of transactions kept in the Central Register upon payment of the
prescribed fee. This ensures public access to information about security interests.
(2) Inspection of Electronic Register: Section 26(2) specifies that the Central
Register maintained in electronic form shall be open for inspection to any person in
the manner and on payment of such fee as may be prescribed. This acknowledges
the digital nature of the registry.
This section, inserted by the 2016 Amendment Act, empowers the Central
Government to order the Central Registrar to rectify any omission or defect in the
register or in any document filed with the registry, or to extend the time for filing
particulars or for intimating satisfaction. This provides a mechanism for correcting
errors and addressing procedural issues.