Section A: Selection, Investigation and Analysis [22]
i. Problem definition/Choice of problem area and background analysis [4]
Meaningful name of system
Location
When it started
Population size
Accept any meaningful variations
(any 4 marking points)
ii. Investigation of the current system [4]
Research instruments (2marks per instruments)
Questionnaires, interview guides, record inspection ,observation
iii. Broad description of existing system [4]
Clearly explain the input, output, process, storage of the existing system
o Input [1]
o Output [1]
o Process [1]
o Storage [1]
iv. Evaluation of existing system [2]
Weakness
Strengths
v. Requirements specification [2]
Software requirements [1]
Hardware requirements [1]
vi. Aims and objectives [4]
Aims (any two aim) [2]
2 Objectives (1 mark per objective) [2]
vii. Evidence of research [2]
Any two from the following (one mark each)
o Filled in questionnaire
o Interview session (question and answer)
o Sample documents
o Description of observation
Section B: Design [11]
(i) Consideration of alternative methods [2]
At least 2 methods
(ii) Justification of method of solution [2]
(iii) Input design [2]
Data capture forms [1]
Screen layouts [1]
(iv) Output design [2]
Specification of required output [2] [max2]
(v) Test plan [3]
Name and describe a test plan including test data and unexpected outcome in your
description
o Name [1]
o Description [1]
o Outcome [1]
Section C: System Development [7]
(i) Technical documentation [4]
At least 2 Pseudocodes of any major modules [2]
At least 1flow charts for any major modules [2]
Code/program listing [1]
(ii) User documenting [3]
Installation [1]
Running the system [1]
Exiting the system [1]
Section D: Testing and evaluation [5]
(i) User testing (any two)[2]
Test for standards data [1]
Test for extreme data [1]
Test for invalid/abnormal data [1]
Error messages [1]
(ii) Evaluation of the system[3]
Achievements
Weaknesses/Limitations
Opportunities for future developments
Section E: General expectations [5]
Depth of knowledge and understanding [1]
Degree of originality [1]
Ease of use (user documentation) [1]
Quality (Defined sections, page number and contents) [1]
TOTAL: 50 MARKS