0% found this document useful (0 votes)
730 views1 page

Difference Between Custom and Usage

The document discusses the distinction between usage and custom in international law, explaining that usage refers to repeated actions by states, while custom emerges when these actions are recognized as obligatory. Custom is defined as a usage that has gained legal force through general acceptance among states. The formation of custom involves various factors, including state interests and diplomatic conduct, with the ultimate test being the consent of civilized nations.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
730 views1 page

Difference Between Custom and Usage

The document discusses the distinction between usage and custom in international law, explaining that usage refers to repeated actions by states, while custom emerges when these actions are recognized as obligatory. Custom is defined as a usage that has gained legal force through general acceptance among states. The formation of custom involves various factors, including state interests and diplomatic conduct, with the ultimate test being the consent of civilized nations.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1
Development or formation of a Custom (a), Custom and Usage? — Usage means those actions which are often repeated by the States; custom on the other hand emerges, when a(clear and continuous habit of doing certain actions groys. up under the aegis of the conviction that these actions are rightCustom is such a usage as has the force of law. Usage is an international habit which has yet not received the force of law. usage represents the twilight zone of custom, custom begins where . - usage ends. When States in their international relations start bchaving in a particular way in certain circumstances, it is expected that in the similar circumstances they will behave in the same way (usage). But when this usage receives the general acceptance of recognition by the States in their relations with each other, there develops a conception that such a habit or behaviour has become right as well as obligation of the State and in this way usage becomes the custom. \ Westlake defines custom as “that line of cont which dhe sosity has consented. t-reats-sbisto y. The obligation arises from fear of enforcement before the courts. ~~ usage may or may not give rise to a custom. Together with usage -'- there are a number of other purely factual phenomenon — State interests, powers, factors, general opinion, historical events, étc. which contribute to the creation of international customs. A usage crystallize into a custom through the conduct of the States at the diplomatic level, actions or ements of various States, foreign policy documents, speeches of delegates international conventions and conferences, practice of international organs ike the U.N., ICJ, etc. The decisions of municipal courts of States, military administrative tribunals in their deliberations and proceedings, following Specific usage in practice, convert a usage into custom. the true test whether a usage has crystallized into a custom is that Must n consent of civilized nations of general ‘of opinions. As to the question of long continuance of the usage » “Before a usage may be considered as amounting to a customary rule of international law, the material and psychological aspects involved in the formation of the customary rule must be established”. Discuss. [.4.5.- 7] A palaainliadi 8 he

You might also like