Appendix A

RESEARCH QUESTIONNAIRE

DIFFICULTIES OF TEACHERS IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF

BLENDED LEARNING MODALITY: BASIS FOR AN INTERVENTION
PLAN

Dear Respondents,

This instrument will determine the Difficulties of Teachers in the

Implementation of Blended Learning Modality: Basis for an Intervention
Plan. The researcher is requesting you to please indicate your honest
and objective answer and leave no blank in each item. Rest assured
that your answer will be treated with utmost confidentiality.

GLADYS C. EDEJER
Researcher

_______________________________________________________________________

Part I. Demographic Profile

Direction: Please put a check on the spaces that correspond to your

responses in each item being asked below. Your answers will be dealt
with confidentiality.

Name: (Optional) ________________________________

Age: ______

Sex:
Male

Female

Plantilla Position: ________________

Length of Service: __________________

Highest Educational Attainment: ________________________

Part II. Difficulties of Teachers in the Implementation of
Blended Learning Modality
Direction: Below are the areas under the study, each has indicators
which you are asked regarding the Difficulties of Teachers in the
Implementation of Blended Learning Modality in your school based on
your self-perception and assessment. Study each item carefully and
check the corresponding number based on the scale below:

Score Description
5 Always
4 Often
3 Sometimes
2 Rarely
1 Almost Never

Scale
Areas/Indicators
5 4 3 2 1
A. Preparation of Modules
As a teacher, I am having difficulties
in….
1. Reproduction of modules for printed
learners.
2. Preparing Learning Activity Sheets in
case of module shortage
3. Having adequate devices to
correspond with reproduction of
modules
4. Being fair and mindful of my learners'
diversed locations and privileges when
submmiting modules.
5. Investing in a fast and reliable internet
service provider for uploading of
modules
6. Having basic technological skills.
7. Giving learners considerable amount
of time to submit their modules and
outputs.
8. Having sufficient number of printed
modules fo learners.
9. Preparing instructional materials for
printed learners.
10. Developing rubrics for assessment
in clear and concise manner.
B. Reinforcement on Content
Delivery
As a teacher, I am having difficulties in….
1. Simplifying concepts during
asynchronous classes.
2. Creating techniques to entice
students to take part in online
discussions.
3. Spending a limited amount of time on
distance classes.
4. Conducting summative tests, quizzes,
and exams online.
5. Producing assessment tools in clear
and concise manner.
6. Having a skill in providing constructive
feedback.
7. Making a simple analogy for each
topic.
8. Using common language to present
concepts and ideas.
9. Developing mastery of skills of
learners.
10. Enhansing metacognitive and
creative problem solving skills among
learners
C. Interaction with learning
facilitators
As a teacher, I am having difficulties
in….
1. Improving teamwork among colleuges.
2. Constant communication with co-
teachers.
3. Sustaining camaraderie along with co-
workers.
4. Valuing effort in distance learning.
5. Showing sympathy with co-teachers
having the same problem.
6. Accomplishing school roles and
responsibility
7. Demonstrating the correct way to
solve a problems encountered with
co-workers
8. Complimenting special effort or
accomplishments
9. Having a skill in providing
constructive feedback to co-workers.
10. Being fair and mindful of my teachers'
diversed locations and privileges.

Appendix B

LETTER TO CONDUCT THE STUDY

 Appendix C

LETTER TO VALIDATORS

Dear Maam/Sir,

Greetings!

The undersigned is conducting a study on the “Difficulties of Teachers

in the Implementation of Blended Learning Modality: Basis for an
Intervention Plan” as approved by the panel members during the
proposal defense in the school of Graduate Studies of STI-West Negros
University.

Considering your expertise in the field of School Administration, I would

like to respectfully request you to one of the validators of my
questionnaires.

I hope for your positive response. Thank you very much.

Respectfully Yours,

GLADYS C. EDEJER
Researcher

Noted:

MERLY M. FRIO, RGC

Adviser
 Appendix D

VALIDATION OF SURVEY INSTRUMENT

Using the criteria developed for evaluating survey questionnaire

set forth by Carter V. Good and Douglas E. Scates, please evaluate the
attached self-made survey instrument for the proposed study. Kindly
check respective boxes provided herein (Rating 1 as poor and 5
excellent).

GLADYS CULIBRA-EDEJER
Researcher

Criteria for Validity 5 4 3 2 1

1. The questionnaire is short enough and ✓

respondents respect it and would not drain
much of their precious time.
2. The questionnaire is interesting and has a face ✓
appeal such that respondents will be induced
to respond to it and accomplish it.
3. The questionnaire can obtain some depth to ✓
respondents and avoid superficial answer.
4. The items/questions and their alternative ✓
responses are not too suggestive and not too
stimulating.
5. The questionnaire can elicit responses which ✓
are definite but not mechanically forced.
6. Questions/items are stated in such a way that ✓
the responses will not be embarrassing to the
person/persons concerned.
7. Questions/items are formed in such a manner ✓
as to avoid suspicion on the part of the
respondents.
8. The questionnaire is not too narrow nor ✓
restrictive nor limited in its philosophy.
9. The responses to the questionnaire when ✓
taken as a whole could answer the basic
purpose for which the questionnaire is
designed and therefore considered valid.

DR. GREGORIO M. MOYANI JR.

Name and Signature

Chief Education Supervisor

 Position

VALIDATION OF SURVEY INSTRUMENT

Using the criteria developed for evaluating survey questionnaire

set forth by Carter V. Good and Douglas E. Scates, please evaluate the
attached self-made survey instrument for the proposed study. Kindly
check respective boxes provided herein (Rating 1 as poor and 5
excellent).

GLADYS CULIBRA-EDEJER
Researcher

Criteria for Validity 5 4 3 2 1

1. The questionnaire is short enough and ✓

respondents respect it and would not drain
much of their precious time.
2. The questionnaire is interesting and has a face ✓
appeal such that respondents will be induced
to respond to it and accomplish it.
3. The questionnaire can obtain some depth to ✓
respondents and avoid superficial answer.
4. The items/questions and their alternative ✓
responses are not too suggestive and not too
stimulating.
5. The questionnaire can elicit responses which ✓
are definite but not mechanically forced.
6. Questions/items are stated in such a way that ✓
the responses will not be embarrassing to the
person/persons concerned.
7. Questions/items are formed in such a manner ✓
as to avoid suspicion on the part of the
respondents.
8. The questionnaire is not too narrow nor ✓
restrictive nor limited in its philosophy.
9. The responses to the questionnaire when ✓
taken as a whole could answer the basic
purpose for which the questionnaire is
designed and therefore considered valid.

RM APRIL T. ALON, RPsy

Name and Signature

University Instructor
 Position

SUMMARY OF VALIDATION RESULT

Using the criteria for evaluating questionnaire developed by

 Appendix E

SUMMARY OF THE VALIDATION

Carter V. Good and Douglas E. Scates, please evaluate the attached

questionnaire for the proposed study entitled “DIFFICULTIES
ENCOUNTERED BY TEACHERS IN THE CONTEXTUALIZATION OF THE
MOST ESSENTIAL LEARNING COMPETENCIES (MELC): BASIS FOR AN
ACTION PLAN”. (Ratings 1 as poor and 5 as excellent).

Criteria for Validity V1 V2 V3

1. This questionnaire is short enough for
the respondents to read it and would not 5 5 5
draw much of their precious time.
2. The questionnaire has a face appeal
such that respondent will be inclined to 4 4 5
accomplish it fully.
3. The questionnaire can obtain some
depth to the responses and avoid 4 4 5
superficial answers.
4. The items/questions and their
alternative responses are not too 5 4 4
suggestive.
5. The questionnaire can elicit responses
which are definite but not mechanically 4 4 5
forced.
6. Items are stated in such a way that the
responses will not be embarrassing to the 5 5 5
person/persons concerned.
7. Items are framed in such a manner as
to avoid suspicion on the part of the 5 4 5
respondents.
8. The questionnaire is not too narrow, 5
not restricted or limited in its scope or 5 5
philosophy.
9. The responses to the questionnaire
when taken as a whole, could answer the
basic purpose for which the questionnaire 5 4 5
is designed and therefore considered
valid.
Mean 4.67 4.33 4.89
Mean of Means 4.63
Interpretation Excellent
 Appendix E

SPSS SUMMARY OF RESULTS

Reliability Test Result

Cronbach Alpha = 0.977 – Excellent

Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary

N %

Cases Valid 30 100.0

Excludeda 0 .0

Total 30 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all

variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items

.977 30

SPSS SUMMARY OF RESULTS

Frequencies

Statistics

Age LoService HEA

N Valid 175 175 175

Missing 0 0 0
Frequency Table

Age

Frequenc Valid Cumulative

y Percent Percent Percent

Valid Younger (below

81 46.3 46.3 46.3
39 years old)

Older (39 years

94 53.7 53.7 100.0
old & above)

Total 175 100.0 100.0

LoService

Frequenc Valid Cumulative

y Percent Percent Percent

Valid Shorter (less

110 62.9 62.9 62.9
than 3 years)

Longer (3 years
65 37.1 37.1 100.0
& more)

Total 175 100.0 100.0

HEA

Frequenc Valid Cumulative

y Percent Percent Percent

Valid Lower
(Bachelor's 76 43.4 43.4 43.4
Degree)

2.00 99 56.6 56.6 100.0

Total 175 100.0 100.0

Descriptives

Descriptive Statistics
Std.
N Minimum Maximum Mean Deviation
A1 175 1.00 5.00 3.6571 1.13317
A2 175 1.00 5.00 3.6571 1.07058
A3 175 1.00 5.00 3.7029 1.12073
A4 175 1.00 5.00 3.5771 1.26106
A5 175 1.00 5.00 3.7771 1.13033
A6 175 1.00 5.00 3.4914 1.17868
A7 175 1.00 5.00 3.6686 1.36621
A8 175 1.00 5.00 3.6971 1.29754
A9 175 1.00 5.00 3.7314 1.24193
A10 175 1.00 5.00 3.7314 1.20434
Amean 175 1.00 5.00 3.6691 1.05464
B1 175 1.00 5.00 3.5314 1.09223
B2 175 1.00 5.00 3.6000 1.12444
B3 175 1.00 5.00 3.6000 1.09334
B4 175 1.00 5.00 3.5257 1.21209
B5 175 1.00 5.00 3.6457 1.17452
B6 175 1.00 5.00 3.5486 1.18258
B7 175 1.00 5.00 3.5714 1.15185
B8 175 1.00 5.00 3.5543 1.15777
B9 175 1.00 5.00 3.6571 1.19729
B10 175 1.00 5.00 3.6629 1.10669
Bmean 175 1.00 5.00 3.5897 1.04376
C1 175 1.00 5.00 3.2286 1.44806
C2 175 1.00 5.00 3.1886 1.55138
C3 175 1.00 5.00 3.1257 1.53734
C4 175 1.00 5.00 3.2571 1.53021
C5 175 1.00 5.00 3.2114 1.55950
C6 175 1.00 5.00 3.2686 1.48242
C7 175 1.00 5.00 3.2400 1.45413
C8 175 1.00 5.00 3.1371 1.55864
C9 175 1.00 5.00 3.1657 1.47818
C10 175 1.00 5.00 3.1829 1.53905
Cmean 175 1.00 5.00 3.2006 1.44622
Valid N
175
(listwise)

Means
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Included Excluded Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
A1 * Age 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
A2 * Age 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
A3 * Age 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
A4 * Age 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
A5 * Age 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
A6 * Age 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
A7 * Age 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
A8 * Age 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
A9 * Age 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
A10 * Age 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
Amean * Age 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
B1 * Age 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
B2 * Age 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
B3 * Age 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
B4 * Age 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
B5 * Age 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
B6 * Age 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
B7 * Age 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
B8 * Age 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
B9 * Age 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
B10 * Age 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
Bmean * Age 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
C1 * Age 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
C2 * Age 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
C3 * Age 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
C4 * Age 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
C5 * Age 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
C6 * Age 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
C7 * Age 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
C8 * Age 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
C9 * Age 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
C10 * Age 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
Cmean * Age 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
A1 * LoService 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
A2 * LoService 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
A3 * LoService 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
A4 * LoService 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
A5 * LoService 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
A6 * LoService 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
A7 * LoService 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
A8 * LoService 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
A9 * LoService 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
A10 *
175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
LoService
Amean *
175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
LoService
B1 * LoService 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
B2 * LoService 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
B3 * LoService 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
B4 * LoService 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
B5 * LoService 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
B6 * LoService 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
B7 * LoService 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
B8 * LoService 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
B9 * LoService 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
B10 *
175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
LoService
Bmean *
175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
LoService
C1 * LoService 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
C2 * LoService 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
C3 * LoService 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
C4 * LoService 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
C5 * LoService 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
C6 * LoService 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
C7 * LoService 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
C8 * LoService 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
C9 * LoService 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
C10 *
175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
LoService
Cmean *
175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
LoService
A1 * HEA 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
A2 * HEA 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
A3 * HEA 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
A4 * HEA 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
A5 * HEA 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
A6 * HEA 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
A7 * HEA 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
A8 * HEA 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
A9 * HEA 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
A10 * HEA 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
Amean * HEA 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
B1 * HEA 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
B2 * HEA 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
B3 * HEA 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
B4 * HEA 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
B5 * HEA 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
B6 * HEA 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
B7 * HEA 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
B8 * HEA 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
B9 * HEA 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
B10 * HEA 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
Bmean * HEA 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
C1 * HEA 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
C2 * HEA 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
C3 * HEA 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
C4 * HEA 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
C5 * HEA 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
C6 * HEA 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
C7 * HEA 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
C8 * HEA 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
C9 * HEA 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
C10 * HEA 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%
Cmean * HEA 175 100.0% 0 0.0% 175 100.0%

A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10 Amean B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7
B8 B9 B10 Bmean C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 Cmean *
Age

Age A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7

Young Mean 3.580 3.617 3.654 3.580 3.802 3.345 3.604

er 2 3 3 2 5 7 9
(belo
w 39 N 81 81 81 81 81 81 81
years
old) Std.
1.149 1.113 1.163 1.253 1.111 1.256 1.357
Deviati
61 19 62 64 53 59 19
on

Older Mean 3.723 3.691 3.744 3.574 3.755 3.617 3.723

(39 4 5 7 5 3 0 4
years
old & N 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
above
Std.
) 1.120 1.037 1.086 1.274 1.151 1.098 1.378
Deviati
72 23 93 14 77 45 83
on

Total Mean 3.657 3.657 3.702 3.577 3.777 3.491 3.668

1 1 9 1 1 4 6
 N 175 175 175 175 175 175 175

Std.
1.133 1.070 1.120 1.261 1.130 1.178 1.366
Deviati
17 58 73 06 33 68 21
on

A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10 Amean B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7
B8 B9 B10 Bmean C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 Cmean *
Age

Amea
Age A8 A9 A10 n B1 B2 B3

Young Mean 3.691 3.642 3.691 3.621 3.469 3.567 3.604

er 4 0 4 0 1 9 9
(belo
w 39 N 81 81 81 81 81 81 81
years
old) Std.
1.281 1.175 1.168 1.035 1.084 1.128 1.068
Deviati
03 89 78 46 97 48 63
on

Older Mean 3.702 3.808 3.766 3.710 3.585 3.627 3.595

(39 1 5 0 6 1 7 7
years
old & N 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
above
Std.
) 1.318 1.297 1.239 1.074 1.101 1.126 1.119
Deviati
44 45 37 68 41 27 90
on

Total Mean 3.697 3.731 3.731 3.669 3.531 3.600 3.600

1 4 4 1 4 0 0

N 175 175 175 175 175 175 175

Std.
1.297 1.241 1.204 1.054 1.092 1.124 1.093
Deviati
54 93 34 64 23 44 34
on
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10 Amean B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7
B8 B9 B10 Bmean C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 Cmean *
Age

Age B4 B5 B6 B7 B8 B9 B10

Young Mean 3.506 3.604 3.518 3.567 3.518 3.604 3.604

er 2 9 5 9 5 9 9
(belo
w 39 N 81 81 81 81 81 81 81
years
old) Std.
1.163 1.158 1.225 1.171 1.163 1.200 1.136
Deviati
22 44 88 95 09 82 65
on

Older Mean 3.542 3.680 3.574 3.574 3.585 3.702 3.712

(39 6 9 5 5 1 1 8
years
old & N 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
above
Std.
) 1.258 1.193 1.149 1.140 1.158 1.198 1.083
Deviati
65 29 94 55 51 83 82
on

Total Mean 3.525 3.645 3.548 3.571 3.554 3.657 3.662

7 7 6 4 3 1 9

N 175 175 175 175 175 175 175

Std.
1.212 1.174 1.182 1.151 1.157 1.197 1.106
Deviati
09 52 58 85 77 29 69
on

A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10 Amean B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7
B8 B9 B10 Bmean C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 Cmean *
Age

Bmea
Age n C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6

Young Mean 3.556 3.074 3.086 3.012 3.049 3.061 3.160

er 8 1 4 3 4 7 5
(below
39 N 81 81 81 81 81 81 81
years Std.
1.045 1.429 1.501 1.504 1.532 1.519 1.444
old) Deviati
70 84 65 11 17 42 44
on

Older Mean 3.618 3.361 3.276 3.223 3.436 3.340 3.361

(39 1 7 6 4 2 4 7
years
old & N 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
above
Std.
) 1.046 1.458 1.595 1.566 1.513 1.589 1.515
Deviati
86 02 72 82 80 98 87
on

Total Mean 3.589 3.228 3.188 3.125 3.257 3.211 3.268

7 6 6 7 1 4 6

N 175 175 175 175 175 175 175

Std.
1.043 1.448 1.551 1.537 1.530 1.559 1.482
Deviati
76 06 38 34 21 50 42
on

A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10 Amean B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7
B8 B9 B10 Bmean C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 Cmean *
Age

Age C7 C8 C9 C10 Cmean

Younger Mean 3.0864 3.0617 3.0494 3.1358 3.0778

(below 39
years old) N 81 81 81 81 81

Std. 1.5111 1.4396 1.4979

1.40710 1.40677
Deviation 7 3 4

Older (39 Mean 3.3723 3.2021 3.2660 3.2234 3.3064

years old &
above) N 94 94 94 94 94

Std. 1.6036 1.5110 1.5804

1.48819 1.47865
Deviation 2 7 9

Total Mean 3.2400 3.1371 3.1657 3.1829 3.2006

N 175 175 175 175 175

 Std. 1.5586 1.4781 1.5390
1.45413 1.44622
Deviation 4 8 5

A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10 Amean B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7
B8 B9 B10 Bmean C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 Cmean *
LoService

LoService A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7

Short Mean 3.681 3.663 3.772 3.700 3.900 3.490 3.790

er 8 6 7 0 0 9 9
(less
than N 110 110 110 110 110 110 110
3
years Std.
1.057 1.034 1.080 1.208 1.057 1.194 1.306
) Deviati
36 07 77 15 52 37 97
on

Long Mean 3.615 3.646 3.584 3.369 3.569 3.492 3.461

er (3 4 2 6 2 2 3 5
years
& N 65 65 65 65 65 65 65
more
Std.
) 1.258 1.137 1.184 1.329 1.224 1.160 1.447
Deviati
62 85 43 58 35 86 81
on

Total Mean 3.657 3.657 3.702 3.577 3.777 3.491 3.668

1 1 9 1 1 4 6

N 175 175 175 175 175 175 175

Std.
1.133 1.070 1.120 1.261 1.130 1.178 1.366
Deviati
17 58 73 06 33 68 21
on

A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10 Amean B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7
B8 B9 B10 Bmean C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 Cmean *
LoService

Amea
LoService A8 A9 A10 n B1 B2 B3
Short Mean 3.818 3.790 3.781 3.739 3.563 3.627 3.627
er 2 9 8 1 6 3 3
(less
than N 110 110 110 110 110 110 110
3
years Std.
1.212 1.134 1.183 .9713 1.079 1.140 1.082
) Deviati
94 09 85 4 65 25 46
on

Long Mean 3.492 3.630 3.646 3.550 3.476 3.553 3.553

er (3 3 8 2 8 9 8 8
years
& N 65 65 65 65 65 65 65
more
Std.
) 1.415 1.409 1.242 1.180 1.119 1.104 1.118
Deviati
57 45 86 85 54 41 46
on

Total Mean 3.697 3.731 3.731 3.669 3.531 3.600 3.600

1 4 4 1 4 0 0

N 175 175 175 175 175 175 175

Std.
1.297 1.241 1.204 1.054 1.092 1.124 1.093
Deviati
54 93 34 64 23 44 34
on

A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10 Amean B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7
B8 B9 B10 Bmean C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 Cmean *
LoService

LoService B4 B5 B6 B7 B8 B9 B10

Short Mean 3.536 3.681 3.609 3.636 3.609 3.690 3.709

er 4 8 1 4 1 9 1
(less
than N 110 110 110 110 110 110 110
3
years Std.
1.201 1.156 1.181 1.155 1.142 1.194 1.103
) Deviati
51 81 63 18 15 37 33
on

Long Mean 3.507 3.584 3.446 3.461 3.461 3.600 3.584

er (3 7 6 2 5 5 0 6
years
& N 65 65 65 65 65 65 65
more) Std.
1.238 1.210 1.186 1.146 1.186 1.209 1.116
Deviati
99 53 26 69 87 34 53
on

Total Mean 3.525 3.645 3.548 3.571 3.554 3.657 3.662

7 7 6 4 3 1 9

N 175 175 175 175 175 175 175

Std.
1.212 1.174 1.182 1.151 1.157 1.197 1.106
Deviati
09 52 58 85 77 29 69
on

A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10 Amean B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7
B8 B9 B10 Bmean C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 Cmean *
LoService

Bmea
LoService n C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6

Short Mean 3.629 3.290 3.318 3.218 3.300 3.281 3.372

er 1 9 2 2 0 8 7
(less
than N 110 110 110 110 110 110 110
3
years Std.
1.019 1.461 1.538 1.564 1.547 1.545 1.445
) Deviati
12 09 09 41 71 23 39
on

Longe Mean 3.523 3.123 2.969 2.969 3.184 3.092 3.092

r (3 1 1 2 2 6 3 3
years
& N 65 65 65 65 65 65 65
more)
Std.
1.088 1.430 1.560 1.489 1.509 1.588 1.538
Deviati
97 77 94 22 27 27 29
on

Total Mean 3.589 3.228 3.188 3.125 3.257 3.211 3.268

7 6 6 7 1 4 6

N 175 175 175 175 175 175 175

Std.
1.043 1.448 1.551 1.537 1.530 1.559 1.482
Deviati
76 06 38 34 21 50 42
on
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10 Amean B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7
B8 B9 B10 Bmean C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 Cmean *
LoService

LoService C7 C8 C9 C10 Cmean

Shorter (less Mean 3.3273 3.2545 3.2727 3.3091 3.2945

than 3
years) N 110 110 110 110 110

Std. 1.5588 1.4708 1.5007

1.40842 1.43641
Deviation 5 7 4

Longer (3 Mean 3.0923 2.9385 2.9846 2.9692 3.0415

years &
more) N 65 65 65 65 65

Std. 1.5499 1.4842 1.5906

1.52810 1.45998
Deviation 7 1 9

Total Mean 3.2400 3.1371 3.1657 3.1829 3.2006

N 175 175 175 175 175

Std. 1.5586 1.4781 1.5390

1.45413 1.44622
Deviation 4 8 5

A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10 Amean B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7
B8 B9 B10 Bmean C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 Cmean *
HEA

HEA A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7

Lower Mean 3.697 3.684 3.763 3.592 3.710 3.539 3.736

(Bachel 4 2 2 1 5 5 8
or's
Degree N 76 76 76 76 76 76 76
)
Std.
1.006 .9689 1.081 1.245 1.030 1.100 1.330
Deviat
91 9 58 55 41 80 35
ion

2.00 Mean 3.626 3.636 3.656 3.565 3.828 3.454 3.616

3 4 6 7 3 5 2
 N 99 99 99 99 99 99 99

Std.
1.225 1.146 1.153 1.279 1.204 1.239 1.397
Deviat
46 91 18 04 08 43 57
ion

Total Mean 3.657 3.657 3.702 3.577 3.777 3.491 3.668

1 1 9 1 1 4 6

N 175 175 175 175 175 175 175

Std.
1.133 1.070 1.120 1.261 1.130 1.178 1.366
Deviat
17 58 73 06 33 68 21
ion

A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10 Amean B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7
B8 B9 B10 Bmean C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 Cmean *
HEA

Amea
HEA A8 A9 A10 n B1 B2 B3

Lower Mean 3.723 3.710 3.789 3.694 3.644 3.657 3.671

(Bachel 7 5 5 7 7 9 1
or's
Degree) N 76 76 76 76 76 76 76

Std.
1.281 1.252 1.135 .9962 1.015 1.089 1.011
Deviat
65 37 09 5 93 99 77
ion

2.00 Mean 3.676 3.747 3.686 3.649 3.444 3.555 3.545

8 5 9 5 4 6 5

N 99 99 99 99 99 99 99

Std.
1.315 1.240 1.258 1.101 1.144 1.153 1.154
Deviat
75 01 82 98 84 72 16
ion

Total Mean 3.697 3.731 3.731 3.669 3.531 3.600 3.600

1 4 4 1 4 0 0

N 175 175 175 175 175 175 175

 Std.
1.297 1.241 1.204 1.054 1.092 1.124 1.093
Deviat
54 93 34 64 23 44 34
ion

A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10 Amean B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7
B8 B9 B10 Bmean C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 Cmean *
HEA

HEA B4 B5 B6 B7 B8 B9 B10

Lower Mean 3.592 3.736 3.605 3.671 3.644 3.710 3.736

(Bachel 1 8 3 1 7 5 8
or's
Degree) N 76 76 76 76 76 76 76

Std.
1.234 1.111 1.108 1.087 1.067 1.068 .9982
Deviati
80 98 50 97 13 53 4
on

2.00 Mean 3.474 3.575 3.505 3.494 3.484 3.616 3.606

7 8 1 9 8 2 1

N 99 99 99 99 99 99 99

Std.
1.198 1.221 1.240 1.198 1.223 1.291 1.185
Deviati
16 33 26 42 61 31 10
on

Total Mean 3.525 3.645 3.548 3.571 3.554 3.657 3.662

7 7 6 4 3 1 9

N 175 175 175 175 175 175 175

Std.
1.212 1.174 1.182 1.151 1.157 1.197 1.106
Deviati
09 52 58 85 77 29 69
on

A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10 Amean B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7
B8 B9 B10 Bmean C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 Cmean *
HEA

Bmea
HEA n C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6
Lower Mean 3.667 3.210 3.289 3.210 3.302 3.184 3.236
(Bachel 1 5 5 5 6 2 8
or's
Degree) N 76 76 76 76 76 76 76

Std.
.9617 1.517 1.521 1.551 1.532 1.572 1.468
Deviati
2 15 54 91 06 35 50
on

2.00 Mean 3.530 3.242 3.111 3.060 3.222 3.232 3.292

3 4 1 6 2 3 9

N 99 99 99 99 99 99 99

Std.
1.103 1.400 1.577 1.530 1.535 1.557 1.500
Deviati
75 37 19 76 67 26 02
on

Total Mean 3.589 3.228 3.188 3.125 3.257 3.211 3.268

7 6 6 7 1 4 6

N 175 175 175 175 175 175 175

Std.
1.043 1.448 1.551 1.537 1.530 1.559 1.482
Deviati
76 06 38 34 21 50 42
on

A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10 Amean B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7
B8 B9 B10 Bmean C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 Cmean *
HEA

HEA C7 C8 C9 C10 Cmean

Lower Mean 3.3026 3.1842 3.1842 3.1711 3.2276

(Bachelor's
Degree) N 76 76 76 76 76

Std. 1.5206 1.4487 1.5089

1.40494 1.43244
Deviation 2 7 8

2.00 Mean 3.1919 3.1010 3.1515 3.1919 3.1798

N 99 99 99 99 99
 Std. 1.5939 1.5075 1.5693
1.49610 1.46364
Deviation 6 6 3

Total Mean 3.2400 3.1371 3.1657 3.1829 3.2006

N 175 175 175 175 175

Std. 1.5586 1.4781 1.5390

1.45413 1.44622
Deviation 4 8 5

NPar Tests

a. Based on availability of workspace memory.

Mann-Whitney Test

Ranks
Age N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks
Amean Younger (below 39
81 84.84 6872.00
years old)
Older (39 years old
94 90.72 8528.00
& above)
Total 175
Bmean Younger (below 39
81 86.49 7006.00
years old)
Older (39 years old
94 89.30 8394.00
& above)
Total 175
Cmean Younger (below 39
81 84.14 6815.00
years old)
Older (39 years old
94 91.33 8585.00
& above)
Total 175

Test Statisticsa

Amean Bmean Cmean

Mann-Whitney U 3551.000 3685.000 3494.000

Wilcoxon W 6872.000 7006.000 6815.000

Z -.768 -.366 -.942

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .443 .714 .346

a. Grouping Variable: Age

NPar Tests

a. Based on availability of workspace memory.

Mann-Whitney Test

Ranks
LoService N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks
Amean Shorter (less than
110 90.07 9908.00
3 years)
Longer (3 years &
65 84.49 5492.00
more)
Total 175
Bmean Shorter (less than
110 89.84 9882.50
3 years)
Longer (3 years &
65 84.88 5517.50
more)
Total 175
Cmean Shorter (less than
110 91.25 10037.00
3 years)
Longer (3 years &
65 82.51 5363.00
more)
Total 175

Test Statisticsa

Amean Bmean Cmean

Mann-Whitney U 3347.000 3372.500 3218.000

Wilcoxon W 5492.000 5517.500 5363.000

Z -.706 -.628 -1.109

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .480 .530 .267

a. Grouping Variable: LoService

NPar Tests

a. Based on availability of workspace memory.

Mann-Whitney Test

Ranks
HEA N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks
Amean Lower (Bachelor's
76 88.43 6721.00
Degree)
2.00 99 87.67 8679.00
Total 175
Bmean Lower (Bachelor's
76 91.19 6930.50
Degree)
2.00 99 85.55 8469.50
Total 175
Cmean Lower (Bachelor's
76 89.02 6765.50
Degree)
2.00 99 87.22 8634.50
Total 175

Test Statisticsa

Amean Bmean Cmean

Mann-Whitney U 3729.000 3519.500 3684.500

Wilcoxon W 8679.000 8469.500 8634.500

Z -.100 -.733 -.235

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .921 .464 .814

a. Grouping Variable: HEA

CURRICULUM VITAE