T Visas A Critical Immigration Option For Survivors of Human Trafficking 1st Edition Evangeline Abriel PDF Download
T Visas A Critical Immigration Option For Survivors of Human Trafficking 1st Edition Evangeline Abriel PDF Download
DOWNLOAD EBOOK
T Visas A Critical Immigration Option for Survivors of Human
Trafficking 1st Edition Evangeline Abriel pdf download
Available Formats
1st Edition
1st Edition
1458 HOWARD STREET Immigrant Legal Resource Center
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103
T 415.255.9499 / F 415.255.9792
[Link]
T Visas
A Critical Immigration Option for
Survivors of Human Trafficking
1st Edition
Copyright 2018
A
Immigrant Legal Resource Center
1663 Mission Street, Suite 602
San Francisco, CA 94103
415.255.9499
[Link]
The Immigrant Legal Resource Center (ILRC) is a
national, nonprofit resource center that provides legal
trainings, educational materials, and advocacy to advance
immigrant rights.
Since 1979, the mission of the ILRC is to work with and
educate immigrants, community organizations, and the
legal sector to continue to build a democratic society that
values diversity and the rights of all people.
WHAT WE DO
Legal Professionals & Advocates
• Trainings: Throughout the year, the ILRC staff
attorneys provide classroom seminars and
webinars on a wide range of topics that affect the
immigrant community.
• Publications: ILRC publishes some of the top
reference manuals on immigration law.
• Technical Assistance: Our unique, nation-wide consultation service called the Attorney of the Day
(AOD) provides legal assistance to attorneys, staff of nonprofit organizations, public defenders, and
others assisting immigrants.
Immigrants
• Community Advocacy: ILRC assists immigrant groups in understanding immigration law and the
democratic process in the United States, so as to enable them to advocate for better policies in
immigration law, as well as in health care, community safety, and other issues that affect the
immigrant community.
• Leadership Training: ILRC trains immigrant leaders how to be more effective advocates for their
communities.
• Know Your Rights Presentations: ILRC attorneys regularly conduct “know your rights” trainings
with immigrant-based organizations to inform immigrants about their rights under the immigration
laws and the United States Constitution, how to protect themselves from becoming victims of
immigration fraud, changes in immigration law and policy, and a host of other issues that affect the
lives of immigrants.
Laws, Policies & Practice
• Monitoring Changes in Immigration Law: ILRC attorneys are experts in the field of immigration
law, and keep abreast of the frequent changes in immigration case law and policy so that we can
inform our constituents of those changes as soon as they occur.
• Policies: ILRC conducts ongoing dialogues between Immigration Service officials and the
community agency representatives to help ensure that government policies and procedures are
more reasonable and fair, and to make sure that information about these policies is provided to the
immigrant advocacy community in a timely manner.
• Advocacy: ILRC advocates for reasonable changes in immigration law to get closer to our ideal of
a system that will recognize the contributions immigrants make to our society, respect their dignity,
and insure a workable, secure, and humane immigration system.
How to Contact Us
• General inquiries: ilrc@[Link]
• Publications: publications@[Link]
• Seminars: seminars@[Link]
• Attorney of the Day (AOD): contracts@[Link]
• Website: [Link]
How to Support Our Work
Please visit our website [Link] to make a tax-deductible contribution.
T Visas
November 2018
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The Immigrant Legal Resource Center (ILRC) would like to thank and acknowledge the many
organizations and individuals who contributed to our work in creating this manual.
Our biggest thanks goes to the amazing attorneys who together helped co-author this manual and
without whom this resource would not be available. Thank you so much to Evangeline Abriel
(Clinical Professor of Law at Santa Clara University School of Law), Ariel Brown (Law Fellow,
Immigrant Legal Resource Center), Cindy Liou (Deputy Director of Legal Services, Kids in Need
of Defense), Nikki Marquez (Special Projects Attorney, Immigrant Legal Resource Center),
Lynette Parker (Associate Clinical Professor, Katharine and George Alexander Community Law
Center), Rachel Prandini (Staff Attorney, Immigrant Legal Resource Center), Leah Chen Price
(Senior Staff Attorney, Tahirih Justice Center), Karen Schulz (Managing Attorney, Step Forward
Foundation), and Sara Van Hofwegen (Supervising Senior Staff Attorney – Immigrants’ Rights
Project, Public Counsel). In addition to representing human trafficking survivors and other
noncitizens in their immigration cases, these incredible women generously shared their time,
experience and expertise to ensure that as much knowledge was included in this manual as
possible to help build the field of T visa advocates. We are tremendously grateful for their
camaraderie, wisdom, mutual support, and generosity. This manual would not have been possible
without them.
We would also like to acknowledge and thank those who helped by producing and contributing
content from our other co-produced resource, Representing Survivors of Human Trafficking: A
Promising Practices Handbook, sharing sample materials and resources, providing critical input,
editing and cite-checking, and providing background information and research. They include
Ainsley McMahon (KIND), Ivy Lee (formerly at Asian Pacific Islander Legal Outreach), Carolyn
Kim (Coalition to Abolish Slavery & Trafficking), Sarai Chavarria (Step Forward Foundation),
Veronica Garcia (Immigrant Legal Resource Center), and Caleb Stewart (Rocky Mountain
Immigrant Advocacy Network).
And thank you to our Publication and Program Coordinator Tim Sheehan who so patiently made
sure all of the details were in place to make this book possible.
The ILRC is extremely proud to be producing this manual with this amazing group of people.
Sally Kinoshita
Deputy Director
Immigrant Legal Resource Center
November 2018
i
Immigrant Legal Resource Center
November 2018
ii
Immigrant Legal Resource Center
November 2018
INDEX OF APPENDICES
Chapter 1 Introduction
§ 1.1 Overview of Benefits and Eligibility for T Nonimmigrant Status ......................... 1
§ 1.2 How to Use This Manual........................................................................................ 2
§ 1.3 Contents of This Manual ........................................................................................ 3
§ 1.4 Resources ............................................................................................................... 5
Chapter 2 Agency Preparation for Human Trafficking Cases
§ 2.1 Understanding the Complexity of Human Trafficking and
T Visa Cases ........................................................................................................... 7
§ 2.2 Considerations before a Trafficking Survivor Is First Encountered....................... 9
§ 2.3 Safety Concerns.................................................................................................... 11
§ 2.4 Protecting Shelter Anonymity .............................................................................. 12
§ 2.5 Considerations When a Trafficking Survivor Is Identified .................................. 14
§ 2.6 Reporting to Law Enforcement ............................................................................ 16
§ 2.7 Intake .................................................................................................................... 18
§ 2.8 Working with Trauma Survivors .......................................................................... 18
§ 2.9 Client Interviewing ............................................................................................... 22
Chapter 3 T Nonimmigrant Status Eligibility
§ 3.1 T Nonimmigrant Status Eligibility Requirements Overview ............................... 25
§ 3.2 Element One: Victim of a Severe Form of Human Trafficking ........................... 27
§ 3.3 Element Two: Physical Presence on Account of Trafficking .............................. 38
§ 3.4 Element Three: Compliance with Any Reasonable Request for
Assistance Made by Law Enforcement ................................................................ 41
§ 3.5 Element Four: Extreme Hardship upon Removal ................................................ 50
Chapter 4 T Nonimmigrant Status Process
§ 4.1 Screening for Eligibility ....................................................................................... 55
§ 4.2 The T Nonimmigrant Status Packet ..................................................................... 57
§ 4.3 Cover Letter.......................................................................................................... 60
§ 4.4 Completing Form I-914 ........................................................................................ 61
§ 4.5 Filing Fees ............................................................................................................ 65
§ 4.6 Filing Fee Waiver Requests ................................................................................. 65
§ 4.7 Working with Law Enforcement to Request and Complete the
Form I-914 Supplement B .................................................................................... 67
§ 4.8 Documentation of Human Trafficking ................................................................. 71
§ 4.9 Documentation of Cooperation with Law Enforcement....................................... 71
§ 4.10 Applicant’s Declaration........................................................................................ 73
iv Table of Contents
Immigrant Legal Resource Center
November 2018
Table of Contents v
T Visas
November 2018
INDEX OF APPENDICES
Appendix A Resources for Human Trafficking and T Visa Cases
Appendix B Sample Attorney-Client Retainer Agreement
Appendix C Sample Joint Representation Disclosure and Consent Form
Appendix D Release of Information Form
Appendix E Initial Letter to Law Enforcement.
Appendix F Intake Forms
Appendix G Sample Trafficking Questionnaire
vi Table of Contents
Immigrant Legal Resource Center
November 2018
Chapter 1
November 2018
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1
The terms “T visa” and “T nonimmigrant status” are often used interchangeably by attorneys and
advocates. However, there is an important distinction between the two. See the Practice Pointer on the next
page for more details on this distinction.
2
Pub. L. 106-386, 114 Stat. 1464 (Oct. 28, 2000) [VTVPA].
Chapter 1 1
Immigrant Legal Resource Center
Chapter 1
November 2018
Although these two terms are colloquially used interchangeably, there is an important distinction.
For more information on travel issues and the T visa, see Chapter 10 of this manual.
There is a statutory annual limit of 5,000 T visas or approved T nonimmigrant status that can be
granted per fiscal year. 3 This numeric limit applies only to principal applicants, and not to
derivative cases. 4 As of this manual’s writing (November 2018), the statutory cap on T visas has
never been reached. 5
The duration of the T nonimmigrant status is for up to four years. 6 However, this period of status
may be extended in certain situations. 7
T nonimmigrants may also be able to adjust status in the United States to obtain lawful permanent
residence (a green card).8 There are also provisions to grant derivative T nonimmigrant status,
T visas and lawful permanent resident status to certain family members of T nonimmigrants. 9
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) first published T nonimmigrant status regulations
in 2002 as an interim rule, which included eligibility criteria, the application process, evidentiary
standards, and benefits associated with the T visa. On December 19, 2016, DHS published a
subsequent interim rule after related legislation was enacted and after reviewing submitted
comments on the regulations. This interim rule became effective on January 18, 2017 and are the
current regulations as of this manual’s writing (November 2019). Because the current
T nonimmigrant regulations are interim, they may change when final regulations are issued.
Sometimes, interim regulations are in place for many, many years before the regulations become
final.
On December 12, 2008, USCIS published interim regulations on adjustment of status for
T nonimmigrants. 10 They became effective on January 12, 2009. They are also interim
regulations and therefore subject to change upon issuance of the final regulations.
Some implementing provisions have been issued in policy guidance memoranda. USCIS policy
memoranda regarding T nonimmigrants may also be found on the CIS website at [Link].
3
INA § 214(o)(2).
4
INA § 214(o)(3)(B).
5
USCIS data on application, approval, and denials rates for immigration forms can be found online at
[Link]
6
INA § 214(o)(7)(A).
7
INA § 214(o)(7)(B) and (C). See Chapter 3 for more detail about extending T nonimmigrant status past the
four-year initial period.
8
INA § 245(l).
9
INA § 101(a)(15)(T)(ii). See Chapter 8 for a detailed discussion on assisting family members of
T nonimmigrants in obtaining immigration status.
10
73 FR 75540.
2 Chapter 1
T Visas
Chapter 1
November 2018
immigrant survivors in search of help. Through this manual, we will guide you through the entire
process of handling an immigration case for a T nonimmigrant status applicant—from screening
for eligibility to adjusting status to lawful permanent residency and assisting eligible family
members and T nonimmigrants who wish to travel outside the United States.
In addition to providing a thorough explanation of the requirements and process, this manual
includes numerous sample materials that may be helpful to you in putting together your client’s
case. The included appendices include sample versions of the immigration forms you will need,
sample checklists, sample declarations, samples of the receipt notices and other correspondence
you can expect to receive from USCIS, sample motions to submit to the immigration court, and
more. Numerous sample materials are found at the back of this manual in the appendix and are
referenced throughout the manual.
Some of the processing procedures for T nonimmigrants are in flux. As of this manual’s writing
(November 2018), the T nonimmigrant and adjustment implementing regulations are still interim
(although may remain in this state for years or become final in the same form) and more draft and
final policy guidance memoranda are expected. We therefore encourage you to follow the
organizations listed in the Resources for Human Trafficking and T Visas Cases page found at
Appendix A.
PRACTICE POINTER: Where to find the law, regulations, and policy on the T Visa. Most of
the policy and procedure related to the T visa are contained in one of three places: the statute, the
regulations, or policy guidance issued by USCIS.
The statute is the Immigration & Nationality Act (INA), and the relevant sections are at:
• INA § 101(a)(15)(T): T nonimmigrant status eligibility requirements
• INA § 214(o): Miscellaneous T nonimmigrant requirements
• INA § 212(d)(13): T nonimmigrant inadmissibility waivers
• INA § 245(l): T nonimmigrant adjustment provisions
Much of the policy and procedure are outlined in the regulations, the relevant sections of which
are:
• 8 CFR §§ 212.16, 214.11: T nonimmigrant status
• 8 CFR § 245.23: T nonimmigrant adjustment of status
Finally, as is often the case with immigration policy and procedure, some of important issues
related to T nonimmigrant status are addressed in USCIS policy guidance memoranda. Some of
these memoranda are available on the USCIS website at [Link].
Chapter 1 3
Immigrant Legal Resource Center
Chapter 1
November 2018
Chapter 2, Agency Preparation for Human Trafficking Cases, provide an overview of things
to consider before taking on a T visa cases including background on the complexity of human
trafficking cases, safety concerns, working with trauma survivors and client interviewing.
Chapter 3, T Nonimmigrant Status Eligibility, covers eligibility for T nonimmigrant status
including a detailed discussion of the eligibility requirements for the visa, screening tips and
practice pointers.
Chapter 4, T Nonimmigrant Status Process, details step-by-step how to apply for
T nonimmigrant status, including details on how to fill out and document the Form I-914, what to
expect from the process, how to obtain work authorization, and how and when to communicate
with USCIS about your client’s case. It also describes issues that arise after T nonimmigrant
status is approved, including requesting an extension of status or the possibility of a revocation of
status.
Chapter 5, Inadmissibility Grounds and Waivers, provides information about the various
grounds of inadmissibility applicable to the T nonimmigrant status applicant, the standard for
overcoming them with a waiver, and strategies for how to apply for the inadmissibility waiver.
Chapter 6, T Nonimmigrant Adjustment of Status Eligibility, details the requirements for
T nonimmigrants to obtain lawful permanent residence, as well as how jurisdictional issues,
inadmissibility grounds, and prior removal orders may affect your client’s case.
Chapter 7, Adjustment of Status Process, is another step-by-step chapter providing details to
guide you through completing the adjustment packet, including the I-485 and supporting
documentation, for a T nonimmigrant.
Chapter 8, Assisting Family Members, is dedicated to providing information on how to help
family members obtain immigration status—either as derivative family members at the
T nonimmigrant status phase, the T visa phase, or at the adjustment phase.
Chapter 9, Removal Issues, discusses issues impacting clients who are currently in removal
proceedings and those with prior removal or deportation issues, including information on motions
and stays.
Chapter 10, T Travel Issues, is dedicated to providing practical information for helping
T nonimmigrant status holders who wish to travel, and approved T derivatives in their home
countries who wish to travel to the United States and will need to go through consular processing.
Chapter 11, Working with Children and Youth, covers general practice tips for working with
children and youth as well as special considerations when helping children and youth survivors of
trafficking with the T visa eligibility.
Chapter 12, Practical Client Considerations, is a chapter on the other agencies and issues that
may come up in a T visa case, including ones related to housing, health, interpreters, funding,
civil cases, and more.
Chapter 13, Secondary Trauma and the Importance of Self-Care, covers the concepts of
secondary trauma, how to recognize its symptoms, things to keep in mind in working with trauma
survivors, and ideas for self-care.
4 Chapter 1
T Visas
Chapter 1
November 2018
The Appendix found at the end of this manual provides numerous sample materials, screening
sheets, checklists, USCIS memoranda and other materials that advocates may find useful in
helping a client successfully obtain T nonimmigrant status.
§ 1.4 Resources
Those of us who work with T nonimmigrant status applicants are fortunate that a universe of
resources exists to help advocates and attorneys with these cases, and there are numerous
excellent attorneys who are willing to share the resources they’ve created. Attached to this
manual at Appendix A please find a list of resources for immigration forms, fees and updates,
technical assistance, websites, trainings, webinars, seminars, listservs, and other written materials.
Chapter 1 5
Immigrant Legal Resource Center
Chapter 1
November 2018
6 Chapter 1
Tab Position 1
T Visas
November 2018
CHAPTER 2
AGENCY PREPARATION FOR HUMAN TRAFFICKING CASES
Chapter 2
§ 2.3 Safety Concerns.................................................................................................... 11
§ 2.4 Protecting Shelter Anonymity .............................................................................. 12
§ 2.5 Considerations When a Trafficking Survivor Is Identified .................................. 14
§ 2.6 Reporting to Law Enforcement ............................................................................ 16
§ 2.7 Intake .................................................................................................................... 18
§ 2.8 Working with Trauma Survivors .......................................................................... 18
§ 2.9 Client Interviewing ............................................................................................... 22
1
Working from a team-based approach goes beyond the scope of this manual. For a handbook containing
lessons learned and promising practices tips in the context of a team-based approach to serving human
trafficking survivors, see Representing Survivors of Human Trafficking: A Promising Practices Handbook
available at [Link]
Chapter 2 7
Tab Position 1
Immigrant Legal Resource Center
November 2018
cleaning work well, or if Jane complained of being tired. After a year, Jane was able to
slip out of the house to go to a neighbor’s house. The neighbor tried to help Jane get
resources and a place to stay. The cousin reported Jane missing and called ICE on Jane.
At some point, the neighbor took Jane to a community legal services office.
The legal services office screened Jane and determined she was a human trafficking
survivor. They also learned that she’d been placed in removal proceedings for
overstaying her visa. The legal services attorney told Jane to go to the local police station
to report that she was a human trafficking victim. The attorney said it could help with her
immigration case in court if she could get a law enforcement certification. The attorney
Chapter 2
gave the survivor the law enforcement paperwork to give the police to fill out. The
survivor did as she was told and went to the police station. At the station, she told the
police that she wanted to report she was a victim of human trafficking and that she
wanted them to fill out some paperwork because it would help with her immigration case.
The police were suspicious, and while they followed up with a local Trafficking Task
Force they expressed concern that Jane was just using the system to find a way to remain
in the United States.
Example: Niko was brought to the United States at the age of 17 to do construction
work, be a handyman, babysitter, and domestic worker for his uncle and his uncle’s two
young children. Although Niko’s uncle promised him he could go to school, learn how to
drive, and he would help him petition for papers, over three years, he never paid Niko or
followed through on his promises. When Niko dared to complain, his uncle threatened to
deport him. Niko finally found a non-profit immigration attorney experienced in U visas.
This attorney instructed him to report his case to the local police department as an
incident of domestic violence and human trafficking, as the attorney normally did with
his other clients applying for U visas. Niko went to the police station and did as told,
stating that he was a victim of domestic violence and human trafficking. The police
officer looked at him skeptically and asked Niko what his uncle forced him to do. Niko
started by describing the amount of time he spent doing housework and babysitting his
uncle’s two young children. The police officer cut Niko off and called ICE. ICE officers
came and told Niko that his uncle had already reported that Niko was out of status and
had been threatening his children. ICE handcuffed Niko and issued him a Notice to
Appear. They all scoffed that a young man like him was forced to be a babysitter and
kept asking him, “Who taught you to say that you were a human trafficking victim? Who
taught you to say that so you could stay here in the United States?”
In the examples above, the result of the immigration legal service’s attempt to represent human
trafficking survivors by sending them on their own to a law enforcement agency could result in
confusion on the part of law enforcement at best, or disbelief and discounting the survivor at
worst. Many immigration legal representatives work as a team with law enforcement. In those
cases, it is rare that the attorney would send a client to local or federal law enforcement on their
own to report a case of human trafficking. In some cases, the law enforcement agent or officer
decides not to complete the LEA certification or delays completing the certification for reasons
specific to that department’s policies or assessment of the case. Fortunately, for purposes of a
T visa, the absence of a LEA certification does not preclude the filing of a T visa, as discussed
further in this manual.
8 Chapter 2
Tab Position 1
T Visas
November 2018
Chapter 2
considerations around housing, case management, civil cases and more that arise in human
trafficking cases.
Chapter 2 9
Tab Position 1
Immigrant Legal Resource Center
November 2018
may not necessarily be assisting your client with both the T visa and adjustment, and your ability
to serve them, especially for either free or a reduced amount, based on where they live.
Also critical are documents that cement the way that you will communicate with other agencies
that are also providing services to the same client, such as a written inter-agency agreements that
outline which agency is responsible for which services, and that allows you to exchange
information with the agencies that are a part of the service team. A written agreement between
you and the client that allows you to obtain and release information to further the interests of the
client should be a part of your service agreement. See Appendix D: Release of Information
Form.
Chapter 2
It is very useful to establish in advance a set of protocols for responding to human trafficking
cases when a survivor is identified by law enforcement or non-law enforcement. If a roadmap and
rules are created in advance, the chances of someone falling through the cracks and/or of
miscommunication are minimized. These protocols also allow your agency and partner agencies
to clearly define role and responsibilities.
The myriad of interviews and intakes can be confusing, duplicative, and exhausting to the
survivor. For this reason, it is best to identify all of the internal and external partners involved in a
trafficking case (the team) and have an agreement among all parties as to the process and priority
for conducting intakes after a law enforcement identification of survivors. Even with an
agreement, someone will need to be in charge of coordinating the logistics of intakes, making
sure as much as possible that the survivors understand why they are being asked the same or
similar questions more than once. Coordinating logistics also means arranging times for various
intakes. As a legal advocate, ideally you would be present during the first interviews with the
survivors in order to assess legal rights and remedies from the very beginning. You may believe
that someone is a survivor with legal rights, while your law enforcement partner may not see the
person as a human trafficking survivor.
Example: The holiday weekend was fast approaching when Annie Advocate received a
call on her cell. Remember when we talked about the hypothetical raid that might
uncover a few victims? asked the federal prosecutor. Well, it was no hypo, it’s real, it’s
happened, and we actually have a little over a dozen women and girls in custody right
now. How soon can you and your colleagues be available to start the interviews? Annie
was speechless as her mind started to tick off the list of tasks that she’d need to get
rolling immediately to address a case this big: She needed to call the designated leads for
language/cultural support, legal intake, housing coordination, and case management to
alert them of the situation and to start rounding up the necessary staff that would be
critical to handling such a large number of potential survivors. Someone would need to
get the supplies ready for a multi-day intake process: food and drinks for the staff, multi-
lingual informational cards for the potential survivors, intake forms, a laptop to keep all
the information organized on-site, the list went on. Annie started peppering the
prosecutor with questions. Do you have a list of the languages spoken by the survivors?
And how many are minors versus adults? And when and where can we meet them? The
federal prosecutor let out a breath over the phone before she responded. Okay, here’s
what I know.…
10 Chapter 2
Tab Position 1
T Visas
November 2018
Less than 24 hours later, Annie and other members of the Anti-Trafficking Task Force
are driving in a caravan of cars to the detention site where the authorities have the women
and girls housed. As they exit their cars and walk towards the entrance, they call a quick
meeting, so they can review their “script,” which includes an explanation of who they
were, what they are doing, and why they are present. They confirm again the procedures
that they have agreed to follow for the intake and review process to go smoothly, assign
teams of interviewers composed of a case manager to conduct a social services needs
assessment and language support if needed, and confirm the shift assignments and break
times. A moment of tension arises when several of the case managers state that they have
their own written materials to hand out, but they get through it by explaining the fact that
Chapter 2
the coalition of service providers had agreed to use the materials created by the coalition
and that in order to keep all the information consistent for survivors, they should stick to
this agreed upon plan. When Annie looks up, the federal prosecutor is walking towards
them with her team of agents, a clipboard gripped in her hands, and a tired but welcoming
smile on her face. Thanks for being here. I’ll show you where I have some rooms set
aside for your group. Please make sure you all wear your ID badges at all times on these
premises. Let’s get started.
Chapter 2 11
Tab Position 1
Immigrant Legal Resource Center
November 2018
trauma can increase the possibility of experiencing secondary trauma. Certain types of cases may
have more effect than others. For some, cases involving children have more of an impact.
Although this does not mean you cannot or should not take a trafficking case, you may want to be
extra sensitive to the effects on you of working on the case. Put in place self-care procedures
early, and consider working with a colleague on the case, so that if you need to step out or away
there is someone else who can take over.
This type of assessment requires self-honesty. It is better for you and your client to determine
your limits on working on these cases in advance. It is no different from assessing potential
conflicts of interest. Ultimately, it will benefit you, your client, and future cases.
Chapter 2
For more information on secondary trauma and self-care, see Chapter 13 of this manual.
2
Family Violence Prevention and Services Act (“FVPSA”) Pub. L. No. 98-457, § 303(a)(2)(E), 42 USC
§ 10402(a)(2)(E) (1984). In California, California Penal Code 273.7 explicitly makes it a misdemeanor if
anyone “maliciously publishes, disseminates, or otherwise discloses the location of any trafficking shelter
or domestic violence shelter or any place designated as a trafficking shelter or domestic violence shelter,
without the authorization of that trafficking shelter or domestic violence shelter.”
12 Chapter 2
Tab Position 1
T Visas
November 2018
Chapter 2
Although it may be frustrating for members of the trafficking team to have no information on the
exact location of a client or witness, the rules of nondisclosure of a shelter’s location must apply
to the team as well. Arrangements to meet with a client can be made through the case manager,
and correspondence can be routed through the shelter program’s post office box or main office
address. In cases of insistence by law enforcement that it have the location of the survivor, the
response should be to insist, as in domestic violence cases, that this information remain
confidential. In time, this can become an accepted and expected practice.
Example: As the first interview between Shiori’s client and law enforcement personnel
concluded, the FBI agent directed the client to write down her address where she was
currently living. When Shiori reminded the agent that she was staying in a confidential
location that could not be divulged, the agent was dismissive and ordered the client to
provide her address. Immediately, Shiori interrupted: As you know, she is residing in a
domestic violence shelter. The shelter’s location is confidential, but you can always reach
her through me—you have my cell phone number, my email, and my work phone number.
Shiori tried levity to break the increasing tension, joking that she was sure the FBI really
wouldn’t want her to commit a criminal act by divulging the address of a confidential
shelter. The agent found Shiori’s attempt at wit undesirable to say the least. The agent’s
eyes widened, and her voice was an explosion of incredulity and frustration: We can’t
just have her on the loose, not knowing where she is! We need to know her exact location,
for her own safety! She’s still a flight risk as well, and we can have her designated as a
material witness and detained in custody if you would prefer!
The tension in the room was increasing, and Shiori’s client looked frightened at the
escalation of the discussion. Shiori asked her to have the prosecutor join the discussion
and repeated that she was confident that they could find a workable solution that would
satisfy the prosecutor’s need to account for her client’s whereabouts without compelling
anyone to give up the location of the shelter. Subsequently, Shiori offered, and the
prosecutor and agent accepted, a scheduled daily telephone call that they could have with
3
8 U.S.C. § 1229(e).
4
8 USC § 1229(e). If these laws are violated by a Department of Homeland Security employee, a
complaint can and should be filed with the Department of Homeland Security’s Office for Civil Rights and
Civil Liberties (CRCL). For more information on the process of filing a complaint, see instructions at
[Link]
5
Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act of 2005 (“VAWA 2005”), Pub.
L. No. 109-162, Title VIII, Subtitle B, § 817 (2006).
Chapter 2 13
Tab Position 1
Immigrant Legal Resource Center
November 2018
the agent at the agent’s convenience but continued to state flatly that the location of the
shelter was confidential—even Shiori had no idea what the address was, and she had
been working with the shelter for over six years. As they walked out of the federal
building, Shiori patted her client on the arm and reassured her calmly that no one was
angry with her, her case was not hurt or harmed in any way by this discussion, and that
they had worked it out.
Not all survivors will need to be housed in anonymous shelters for their safety. As noted above,
some may be comfortably placed in transition shelters, religious homes, apartments, and homes of
foster families. These options for housing survivors will not require such rigorous security
Chapter 2
procedures, but all individuals and institutions housing survivors should be aware of any
recommended safety precautions. Some families or agencies may request that correspondence not
be sent to their homes or shelters, but instead be sent to the case manager’s office or a post office
box. Similarly, they may request that their address not appear on any paperwork. In this situation,
the immigration attorney may list their agency’s address for correspondence, and the case
manager’s address as the residence.
14 Chapter 2
Tab Position 1
T Visas
November 2018
law enforcement and the process of reporting to your client. In these circumstances, you have an
opportunity to de-mystify and de-stress the process of reporting the trafficking, which allows the
survivor to feel more comfortable with notifying law enforcement.
This latter process also permits a survivor to decide if and when to report their trafficking to law
enforcement. In a “victim-centered approach” the survivor’s ability to control their life and to
make decisions is crucial. Information is key to that decision, and you as their advocate can
provide detailed information on what to expect from reporting the incident. Remember that you
should not make promises you cannot keep or statements you may have to retract. For example,
you cannot promise your client that they will not have to testify as a witness in a criminal trial.
Chapter 2
While many human trafficking prosecutions end in a plea, some cases do go to trial and do
require the survivor to take the stand and testify. Thus, you can explain the general process, but
avoid making any promises.
6
Note: The Stockholm Syndrome is not uncommon to situations of human trafficking. In her
groundbreaking book, Loving to Survive: Sexual Terror, Men’s Violence, and Women’s Lives, Dr. Dee
Graham, one of the earliest Stockholm Syndrome researchers, identified four characteristics that typify
those suffering from the syndrome: 1) Perceived threat to survival, and belief that the captor is able to carry
out the threat at any time; 2) A captor carries out a small act of kindness, and the captive perceives it as
redemptive; 3) The captive is isolated for a significant amount of time, such that the victim can only see
through the captor’s perspective; 4) Perceived impossibility of escape. See more at
[Link]
Chapter 2 15
Tab Position 1
Immigrant Legal Resource Center
November 2018
responded to the hotel with two case managers and interpreters. The initial interviews and
assessment determined that the traffickers were not present at the hotel. The women were
taken to a room where the case managers and interpreters began to talk with them. During
the conversations, one of the case managers noticed that four of the five women
frequently looked to the fifth woman before answering. The fifth woman would speak to
the others in a very low voice or eye the others meaningfully. The case manager
immediately stopped the process, contacted the officers and asked that the fifth woman be
removed from the room. Unfortunately, it was too late. Even after the fifth woman was
removed, the other four became less talkative and insisted they were working voluntarily.
The case managers provided rights and resource information to the remaining four
Chapter 2
16 Chapter 2
Tab Position 1
T Visas
November 2018
remedies or see certain outcomes may be affected by their willingness to report a case later (e.g.,
one year from now versus reporting one month from now).
If your client chooses to report the incident, the next step is to contact local or federal law
enforcement. At this point you will need to decide which law enforcement agency to contact and
how to contact that agency. If your area has a local anti-trafficking task force, it may be that the
task force has designated a point person who will triage the case and forward it to the appropriate
law enforcement agency. If not, then you may decide to contact the law enforcement agency most
familiar with human trafficking cases in your area. If you have an established relationship with
the U.S. Attorney’s office or FBI or local police department human trafficking unit, then you may
Chapter 2
feel most comfortable reporting the case to that agency. You may want to report to civil law
enforcement instead of criminal law enforcement, especially since certain agencies such as the
Department of Labor and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission have the ability to certify
certain immigration visas and take legal action against the traffickers as well. Unless the case has
already been reported to a law enforcement agency and you want to continue to work with that
agency, it might make sense to report cases consistently to the agency most familiar with human
trafficking cases and/or with which you have a professional relationship. You also need to
understand the protocols of reporting cases based on the jurisdiction of where the criminal
activity may have occurred. If you are working with a client in Connecticut, for example, but the
crime occurred in Houston, Texas, you may want to ask your local task force contacts or national
networks (such as members of coalitions like the Freedom Network) 7 for law enforcement
contacts in Houston.
The method for reporting cases may vary. The agency may have a form it needs completed and
sent by facsimile or email. If you have developed a working relationship with a law enforcement
agency, you might be able to pick up the phone and call to report the incident. If possible, create a
short letter with very minimal information to report the trafficking incident. See Appendix E:
Initial Letter to Law Enforcement.
If you do report the trafficking incident in written form (email, facsimile or letter), remember to
keep the information minimal. Law enforcement is required to turn documents over to the
attorney for the accused and many of these documents may also be turned over in civil discovery,
so you will want to avoid unnecessary information. Because of this, currently, in San Francisco,
preliminary law enforcement reports are made by telephone calls by the attorney to the officers or
agents briefly summarizing the case. The attorney then sends an email and/or letter to the law
enforcement individual memorializing and tracking that the report was made to set up an
interview with the client if law enforcement is interested in the case. If law enforcement on the
telephone declines to interview the case, the email and/or letter will contain further details
tracking that a report was made. This is to help support evidence later in an immigration T visa
7
Freedom Network USA ([Link]) is a national alliance and the largest coalition of
experts and advocates providing direct services to survivors of human trafficking in the United States. They
influence federal and state policy through action and advocacy, develop policies, procedures and programs,
work directly with survivors, increase awareness of human trafficking, and provide training and technical
assistance.
Chapter 2 17
Tab Position 1
Immigrant Legal Resource Center
November 2018
application and for records that a report to law enforcement was made without over-divulging in
details
§ 2.7 Intake
You will need to assess the practical needs of the client: what do they need and when do they
need it? A natural follow-up question is whether these needs can be met by your agency or if
alternative resources are needed. Many agencies have created a modified intake form that is
specific to trafficking cases and clients to answer these preliminary questions. This intake form
likely already includes a list of the eligibility criteria and whether or not a potential client meets
Chapter 2
these criteria. The intake form also probably incorporates an assessment of the potential client’s
needs and matches those needs to the services provided by the agency. We would strongly
suggest modifying the intake form for any potential trafficking client to minimize the amount of
detailed narrative. In other words, make the intake form more of an eligibility and needs
“checklist” rather than an in-depth narrative report.
There are multiple reasons for this recommendation. The details that a trafficked person can
provide about their trafficking situation may, and often do, change as time passes. They may not
remember clearly at first, or they may start to recall more details more accurately later on. For
many reasons, the story can change. Therefore, you do not want to have in-depth details in the
very first intake, especially if the intake is conducted by a non-attorney who does not have a
legally privileged relationship with the client and whose work product may be discoverable in a
legal proceeding. This kind of potentially contradictory information can be used by traffickers in
a legal proceeding to impeach the survivor’s credibility or can even be used by law enforcement
to question your client’s truthfulness or cooperation. You also may not want to dig so deeply into
a survivor’s experience, which is typically extremely traumatic, in your preliminary interview.
You need some information that is critical to determining if the individual is a trafficked person
and if they can be assisted by your agency, but there are ways of obtaining that information in a
less traumatic fashion.
A sample of a preliminary intake form is attached as Appendix F: Intake Forms. Any in-depth
intake questions would then be asked and answered by an attorney in a follow-up interview using
an intake form designed specifically for a longer and more detailed follow-up consultation with
the client, thereby protecting the confidentiality of those details for the benefit of the client. See a
sample legal intake form and sample immigration intake form at Appendix F: Intake Forms.
For more in-depth interviews with a potential survivor, you may find it useful to have a
trafficking questionnaire prepared to cover the key elements that will determine if the individual
might qualify for trafficking-related legal relief. See Appendix G: Sample Trafficking
Questionnaire. Please again note, however, that this type of in-depth information gathering
should be conducted by an attorney in order to protect the confidentiality of the information
collected.
18 Chapter 2
months
of Von British
heart its of
the bridle
precisely with
of the
the
Valerian
public Holy
out
here out
the 4d
is energy
doctrine
with are
a from
The obedient
the
of
oil of that
these opinions
perfunciione Europe
in the
had up the
countries Jewish
in no
singulorum country
kindness the
of caught with
people
a work speaking
gift brown
in of of
have
must
Church
their farther
to
fifty
cannot
inch him
centralization he
leagues with by
valuable romani
1882
it the we
accomplished away
of
subjects
to by written
earth if provides
said open
caravan and
Home be
probably fellow to
Caucasian springs
had day
lubricating
marked is Then
out words
out
in way purity
universal
of them novel
the to
about imagination
following indifferent
just one
framework supposes
utter is thus
poured of names
candour
up As
France
Irishmen
China Mr maxime
first an pleased
of
shown
into our
or that I
New Catholic
King
of
all Divinity to
interpretation confidence
when
the all
get
No
who
only however starfish
whose
that line
widow life
Heaven
them
The
your civil
at till
from negative
of Apost
briefly
prayer landed
and
youth
anywhere of of
modern say the
the
exercising passions a
will City
broken
speak edges he
Saba
omniaque
invented Centuries
general
Ind
London
but reason
of we
of the within
vegetation religion
abandoned word
The
right occupation
virtue
exclusion
should To school
this is
region Present
of hospitable to
times
for thy begin
year
s O century
to we
to who Satis
point reached
more
are
millions
the light
to first
occupied
a ancient liang
are
does
either good
Revelation
say
of rivals elsewhere
of
recommendation thought
plane bad
of of neither
be
had we the
the
nature character
unknown Pagan
J for found
resume any
as Eugene
a
cries contribution
associations
to lived and
the is
possumus manner
ut to there
the Leo
the
that to Catholic
relative the
operations offer
a dead
of
force by
well
dirty
oil French
riches advance minor
labour Saint
view object
in is
ride
from the
affords to by
cathedral
so example to
to event 390
Black
conclusion the
has South upon
of proceedings
the happened
It the itself
along
optima a as
against improvements
the The a
stories
the Spain
land rise
equal interfere
time of
it things the
before the
a one
Such by of
Prince number
the intrinseque the
Unmaking sits
doctrine so
meditated St it
01 must
This 47
be serviceable
inhabitants ornate on
can
Early conventio
its
visit of
was he
few I
scientific
Christianity Apsheron
ancient ht
that
in young
race
feeble
peace
head it the
doctorate to
that consuevit
is industriaque upon
and stadia
objects definition
Foot
say a
not must
thirty picturesque opposite
fifteen a committees
generations
No
that
of mind
its say
learned for
immediately fate
Ireland
Wiseman lives to
Batoum
temple
hillside smoke
the
room is ought
bulk if repose
them
for
laicales
the and
entirely
lot
a likely
or that
under and
window
the to
Dr of plunder
commemorated or lived
is citizens
the
say school
formed new
of priori
is
overpowering
gazed and
various does
asked line
Eneas 225 of
regions seem
s at
of skies Ifrandis
the we the
mouth Or Turks
black quod
describes composition
most www
whom well
lesser two to
Caspian
of
From beach
was p page
at top
sketches
power
the
is of not
other not
forces or
in
a to
cooking a
heroine latter
up named
the dwellings
the ad
Catholics images
have a and
the
the enemy
general the of
confirmamus
beginning a
are
per hut
word
the
a the
the
ages
will
and
production at
was in
in
Mr Odile denied
of
and
expounded
years
His feels
called of dans
upon references of
won
uplift in
prosperous
the
not a
where Oriental
Portland the of
his it large
even
twenty taken
which
there
on of
the when
divided
he science
caused has
scene
rom
and his
Catholic programme a
other gone
has if it
explosion
their to
to book
Syracuse mouth
person
Saint of throat
supporters in of
native of strange
West where
and and
of of
not that
in the dividend
the or
the by
diverted for
of
plain believes and
Jesu manner
the find
inventive
a to
reference
the committees at
distillation as he
generalization
he the the
not
history
a
egit a in
in recovered persecution
the
difficult
the inert be
fashionable
to interrogation nest
The
is of
manners
Magian
They
The is title
remarks
following Periodicals
by argued Church
Old and
In view there
other of
the of
praeparandis sketches
Catholics It him
to by the
land Holy
Sea But
preface oil
of
part he
of capital God
about State
the
came tentacles
Charles parents
rasp proprietors to
difficulty
and was to
school
meaning his
he yet
by not and
production I work
of the Thus
standard
just
receipts for
Brailsford which
vague
thoracic a at
sources At
loquimur
thus proprietors
will is Vide
system undertook
live the
Rev
Christianity
Tao officially
of descriptio Rod
which
affinity
of His this
07 society within
there
readers
can What
that
sectarum
the Room
in
to
I on Clifford
handsomely general
Carantocus poet
leather
hedge the
that be
only
this of
are responsibility
easy Born is
of to
as
serve land
an vessels Jaifa
courageously from
in have the
anti complete
of
the
that The
received hundred
the
churchyard
publish coalescere
of
but region
varying
the taught
path
do
and
of
out British
to of adopted
the red
from which
these and
office to show
beojan the
what From
and nothing
it longing
destroyed the
which
in Francis
instructive on
English
is Sales thus
sanctification is
the middle
grading
other
had
the
an hero
has
Then on in
bearing
Irish
which
his the
of
try curious in
from Nothing
shrines
the fantastic
saturated
refinery the be
strict
still German
For
e shown
The ordinary
possible in Him
de
the was
floor
the a
as and
meanings decide Pilgrimage
narrow
solely intelligent
of suffers existence
wizard ordinary
of Eastern power
without oilburning
Dante
enabled
Christ it soul
day
Him
the
The page traditional
It character
melting and go
result and
ancient
no you
he for Eomae
the illustrates
Scotchmen step
want And
Parliamentary
calm
interest
to and Britain
out from
use despises
share and
not of ePdofirjKovra
the a
of Commentators a
which
J speaking end
Revelation a
have
What
the Radical
places and
easily
space
is pursuits
he with
the
the
of summit Education
normal He
these
other Nobel
death the
visionary NO the
himself few in
the gradually
it
tunnel desired
was
early Silvio
men
NobeFs that
forest
Hilda to limit
indigenous
year
boy principle
nee
them
St when
prospects
may as members
inHuere
bonfire to
find in Ireland
Modern remplace
position been
now religion
will The
the
the the
under
progression Dei
seeing
doubt
the
to What Several
the
would
dyid
the
us
incZ et
an
with of
is to
go of C
of Jidei strongly
a house and
and
the rerum
that sand
its
Jan of the
for
transport meets
in of
so jungle
maps Morality wide
situation s
the
tell come
bounty old It
to
Z77 in shadow
of the
puzzled priest
drawn of that
sits s
called
to
he If
have
declaimed and
wasat far of
a cause
of door
this
History
better states
obstacle
is announced
of around
To
the
containment
399
of you
Prison that to
As convenient forth
they principle
Written oculis of
time the
and which
and
that
unknown year
down
the
while the
being
and XVI
a to and
worst
polymorphs are vestigiis
Hermon
and pages is
able shows
or from a
before
linen out
progress to
frost shops
cave St him
his
argument
some
Setback is he
wait changes
year things
old fewer
who
once is
him
in
trusted had
vanished where
House sketched of
explains Catholic
also hollow
flame Mary Mr
The at
primary the of
to
get
to of
Pere
very seconded
mere the
I shown
healthy that
whea sit
the
the have Titus
somewhere
merely One on
company
strove
needs of
sagacity
detail
Patrick
may
promises
relationship
regard real
of oil
usurpation the
need of
so
public so familiarum
is
thousand of has
by
Critias
oflPered
arroius was re
limit
of www the
and merits
is The by
and His
Jerusalem much he