CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the Study
Water pollution majorly arises from anthropogenic inputs above natural
background concentration within a specified environment. The presence
of environmental toxicants or pollutants in any ecological environment
whether aquatic or terrestrial reduces not only the quality of such
environment but also its use or applicability by natural dwellers (both
plants and animals) within such locality (Krishna et al., 2009; Ibrahim et
al., 2016). Global attention has greatly shifted to the contamination of
aquatic environments by heavy metals. This not only because of its
toxicity, but also its persistence and abundance in the environment (Islam
et al., 2015). Natural factors and human activities affect the concentration
or abundance of heavy metals in the environment (Khan et al., 2008).
Rapid increase in the number of industries and population drift to urban
centres has led to increased levels of heavy metals and organic pollutants
in the environment (Sedky et al., 2013).
Heavy metals are considered as important intermediates of pollution in
aquatic environments and public health studies (Khaled et al., 2012). This
1
is due to the fact that they can induce certain disease conditions and also
when they are released, they get deposited on sediment and can later be
immobilized depending on the prevailing condition within the environment
(Marcus and Edori, 2016). Heavy metals sometimes are found at trace
concentrations. They can be immobilized within the sediment through re-
suspension, absorption, precipitation and co-precipitation with other
elements in the form of oxides and hydroxides (Mohiuddin et al., 2010;
Awofolu et al., 2005) and also undergo complex formation reactions.
Heavy metals do not undergo biodegradation, and so can be concentrated
along the food chain. Therefore, their toxic effects in most cases are felt
or observed at points that are distances removed from the source of
pollution (Tilzer and Khondker, 1993). Human exposure to heavy metals
have been
associated with several diseased conditions in man, animals and plants,
more especially when they are present at high concentrations (Saha and
Hossain, 2011).
In order to properly monitor and restore the integrity of any water body,
there is the need to adequately protect the sediment quality of that
aquatic system. This will further help to preserve aquatic life, wild life and
2
human well-being (Issa et al., 2011). Sediment is known to be the final
sink for
pollutants in aquatic systems and also a very important part of aquatic
ecosystem. It serves as a habitat, food source, spawning ground and
rearing areas for many aquatic plants and animals (Issa et al., 2011).
This study was therefore carried out to examine the concentration of some
heavy metals in sediment in Andoni River, Rivers State, Niger Delta,
Nigeria.
conducted on sediments in river systems
1.2 Statement of Problem
Aquatic ecosystem is the ultimate recipient of almost everything including
heavy metals. Pollution of heavy metals in aquatic environment is a
growing problem worldwide and currently it has reached an alarming rate.
There are various sources of heavy metals, some originates from
anthropogenic activities like draining of sewerage, dumping of Hospital
wastes and recreational activities.
Conversely, metals also occur in small amounts naturally and may enter
into aquatic system through leaching of rocks, airborne dust, forest fires
and vegetation. As heavy metals cannot be degraded, they are
3
continuously being deposited and incorporated water, sediment and
aquatic organisms, thus causing heavy metal pollution in water bodies.
1.3 Aim and Objectives of the Study
The aim of this project research is to determine heavy metals in Unyeada,
Andoni River and its Sediments water and sediments.
The specific objectives are:
i. The determine the concentration of heavy metals in the sediment
sample
ii. To identify various heavy metals in the sediment and water samples.
iii. To compare the value obtained with the WHO regulatory standard.
1.4 Significance of the Study
The followings are the importance of the study:
i. This study will determine the water quality of Unyeada, Andoni
River and its Sediments water and sediments.
ii. This study will educate the inhabitants on the effects of heavy
metals on human consumption.
iii. This study will identify different heavy metals and their effect on
human health.
4
iv. This study will add to the existing literature on the effect of heavy
metals on human health. Sources of materials used are cited as
references.
v. This study will investigate the sources of the water pollution and
provide solution to remediate them.
1.5 Scope of the Study
This study focuses on determination of heavy metals concentration in
Unyeada, Andoni River and its Sediments and sediments. This study will
also emphasize on the sources of heavy metals concentration in Unyeada,
Andoni River and its Sediments water and Sediments.
1.6 Definition of Terms
The followings are the scientific terms used in this study:
i. Heavy Metals: These are metals that are poisonous like Cu, Zn and
Al.
ii. Waste: Unwanted materials
iii. Pollutants: substance that are impure and has effect on both plants
and humans.
iv. Water Body: This refers to the rivers, stream and lack.
5
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
Many studies in the field of checking river water quality in terms of heavy
metals have been reported. Odiyo et al., (2019) examined the
concentration of metals in Gamasyab River located in Hamedan province.
The results showed that the concentration of heavy metals of copper and
iron in the water of Gamasyab River had significant growth, possibly due
to the entrance and leakage of agricultural and urban wastewaters. In
addition, the results of studies conducted by Ahmad, J.U.; Goni, M.A.
(2014) evaluated the concentration of heavy metals in the water
resources and river of Borujerd City in 2008-2009.
Duruibe, J.O.; Ogwuegbu, M.O.C.; Egwurugwu, J.N. (2017) about the
evaluation of the superficial and internal contamination of the sediments
in the mouth of Kam River, and Hifung State in Vietnam indicated that
different sources such as industrial development with agricultural activities
in these regions, urban, and industrial wastewaters that enter into these
rivers have caused significant contamination with heavy metals. Karun
River is one of the largest rivers in Iran that is placed near agricultural
lands with large cities and several industries around itself, and the water
of the river is used for irrigation of areas of planted, urban green space,
6
and propagation, and growing aqua cultural. 87.33%, 6.44%, and 6.23%
of the Karun River's water are used for agriculture, aquaculture, and
drinking, respectively (Duruibe et al., 2017). However, unfortunately, due
to the rapid development of urbanization, industries, and technology
along with increased areas of cultivation, different contaminants in terms
of physical, chemical, and biological contaminants are entered in this river
annually. According to statistics, this river receives urban, agricultural, and
industrial wastewaters as much as 26, 48, and 23%, respectively.
Obviously, this over-contamination has hampered self-purification abilities
of the river (Duruibe et al., 2017), Aquatic ecosystem is the ultimate
recipient of almost everything including heavy metals. Pollution of heavy
metals in aquatic environment is a growing problem worldwide and
currently it has reached an alarming rate. There are various sources of
heavy metals; some originates from anthropogenic activities like draining
of sewerage, dumping of Hospital wastes and recreational activities.
Conversely, metals also occur in small amounts naturally and may enter
into aquatic system through leaching of rocks, airborne dust, forest fires
and vegetation. As heavy metals cannot be degraded, they are
continuously being deposited and incorporated in water, sediment and
aquatic organisms, thus causing heavy metal pollution in water bodies.
7
A study by Song et al., (2019) suggested that, concentrations of metallic
pollutants are greatest near towns, indicating their urban industrial
origins. Within the lake basin, extensive mining occurs mainly in Tanzania
where small-scale miners use water to remove mud and impurities and
mercury to collect gold Vergas, (Migliavacca, et al., 2018). The
wastewater from such processes is usually disposed off into nearby
streams with ultimate destination into Lake Victoria basin. Other possible
sources of pollution include; domestic effluents, urban storm water runoff,
landfill leachate, atmospheric sources and boating activities.
Earlier studies on sediment, water and biota of Lake Victoria reflected no
significant heavy metal pollution (Vergas, 2018). However, subsequent
studies have shown increased levels of especially lead (Vergas, 2018).
This was attributed to increased shipping traffic, car washing and
discharge from local industries.
In a review by Edokpayi (2019) concluded that generally lower
concentration of heavy metals occur in African aquatic ecosystems
compared to other areas of the world. However, due to increases in
urbanization and socioeconomic activities, the threat of pollution was
bound to increase within our aquatic systems.
8
Varol, M.; Sen, B. (2019) described that rapid development of industries
such as chemical industries along with the discharge of a variety of
industrial and urban wastewaters into the environment over the past few
decades has caused the contamination of surface and groundwater
resources and the emergence of several environmental problems. Among
the most important portable and consumed water resources in cities and
villages, rivers play an important role in providing human and
environmental health. However, unfortunately over the past few years, in
response to various human activities, the quality of water of these
important resources has changed, and the harmful effects of water
contamination have gradually been unearthed. Among the contaminants
exist in wastewater industries, mines and urban and agricultural runoffs
entered aquatic ecosystems; heavy metals are noteworthy.
Unlike organic contaminants, decomposition in the environment requires
a long time and due to their toxicity, persistence, and non-degradability
in the environment.
In addition, bioaccumulation potential in many aquatic species is one of
the most important environmental hazards. Since some of these metals
have biomagnifications properties after accumulation in the tissues of
living organisms, they move toward higher levels of the food web, and
9
finally, are transferred into the human body, which is on the top of the
food web, sometimes threaten the human health. Therefore, the
determination of the levels of heavy metals in aquatic ecosystems can
play an important role in the health of living organisms, especially human.
The study of river water quality in terms of heavy metals due to their very
low concentrations, and thus, the low measurement accuracy in water, is
difficult, whereas the concentration of the metals is far higher in
sediments.
Jadia and Fulekar (2019) postulates that Heavy metals appear in marine
sediments in low concentrations, ranging from µg kg-1 to mg kg-1 (Szefer,
2002). Stoeppler (1991) provided a comprehensive review of the most
frequently used techniques for quantitative analysis of metallic trace
elements. Instrumental determination of heavy metals in the acidic
solution obtained is carried out depending on the instrument and
manufacturer's specifications. In most cases, i.e., in most marine
sediments, Cd and Pb can be determined by GFAAS (Graphite Furnace
Atomic Absorption), while Cu, Zn, Cr, Ni, Mn, Al, and Fe can also be
determined by the less sensitive flame atomization.
Earlier studies on sediment, water and biota of Lake Victoria reflected no
significant heavy metal pollution (Edokpayi, 2019). However, subsequent
10
studies have shown increased levels of especially lead (Samarghandi et
al., 2018). This was attributed to increased shipping traffic, car washing
and discharge from local industries.
In a review by Samarghandi et al. (2018) it was concluded that generally
lower concentration of heavy metals occur in African aquatic ecosystems
compared to other areas of the world. However, due to increases in
urbanization and socioeconomic activities, the threat of pollution was
bound to increase within our aquatic systems. Similar conclusion was
made following a study on 3000 lakes with the Nordic region in which the
sparsely populated Northern region was found to much less polluted
compared to the south with heavy anthropogenic activities (Samarghandi
et al., 2018).
The presence of heavy metals in the water may have a profound effect
on the microalgae which constitute the main food source for bivalve
mollusks in all their growth stages, zooplankton (rotifers, copepods, and
brine shrimps) and for larval stages of some crustacean and fish species.
Moreover, bio-concentration and magnification could lead to high toxicity
of these metals in organisms, even when the exposure level is low. Under
such conditions, the toxicity of a moderately toxic metal could be
enhanced by synergism and fish population may decline.
11
Apart from destabilizing the ecosystem, the accumulation of these toxic
metals in aquatic food web is a threat to public health and thus their
potential long term impact on ecosystem integrity cannot be ignored. The
present study was therefore undertaken to assess the levels of heavy
metals in water and sediment from Lake Victoria and how this relates to
bioaccumulation of the pollutants in microalgae.
The study also aimed at determining how the level of heavy metal
pollution varies with dry, short rain and long rain seasons.
Heavy metals concentration was determined from water, sediment and
microalgae samples. The results clearly indicate that concentration were
highest in the sediment samples from both gulfs compared to water and
microalgae.
In general, metal content in sediments is indicative of the degree of
pollution and serves as a source of solubilization into water depending on
the physico-chemical circumstances (pH, temperature etc) and the uptake
by benthic organisms. At Winam Gulf for instance, Zn, Hg and Cr were
more concentrated in sediment samples, the same trend was also noted
in Mwanza samples. Hg is the only metal known to be liquid at room
temperature and with low solubility in water. Dissolved Hg is distributed
among several chemical forms including elemental Hg, that is volatile but
12
relatively uncreative, a number of mercuric species Hg(II) and organic-
Hg such as methyl, dimethyl and ethyl mercury. In general, the levels of
total Hg and MeHg are higher near the sediments (Samarghandi et al.,
2018). This could possibly account for the results of our study that
indicated higher levels of Hg in sediments compared to either water or
microalgae samples. The same explanation could apply for the other
metallic elements, being no biodegradable in nature (Duruibe et al.,
2017). Metals are commonly found adsorbed in sediments. The presence
of higher concentration of heavy metal in sediments from this study is in
agreement with other related studies.
A study on heavy metal pollution in Lake Victoria sediments from samples
collected from seventeen different locations around the lake town of
Mwanza, representing three zones of activities. The results showed that
sediments samples collected from southern part, which is the industrial
area, had the highest concentrations of V, Cu, Zn, As and Pb but the same
were generally low in the northern part which is least in anthropogenic
activities. Another study on the shores of Lake Victoria, within the urban
area of Mwanza showed elevated levels of heavy metal, notably Pb
(54.6±11.1 ppm) and Zn (83.7±21.5 ppm) in sediment samples (Duruibe
et al., 2017). The link between anthropogenic activity and heavy metal
13
pollution in lake Victoria was further supported by a study on the level of
contamination in wetland soils and plants in lake basin around Kampala
city.
Furthermore, a study by Tole and Shitsama (2019) suggested that,
concentrations of metallic pollutants are greatest near towns, indicating
their urban industrial origins. Within the lake basin, extensive mining
occurs mainly in Tanzania where small-scale miners use water to remove
mud and impurities and mercury to collect gold (Duruibe et al., 2017).
The wastewater from such processes is usually disposed off into nearby
streams with ultimate destination into Lake Victoria basin. Other possible
sources of pollution include; domestic effluents, urban storm water runoff,
landfill leachate, atmospheric sources and boating activities (Ahmad and
Goni, 2014).
CHAPTER THREE
MATERIALS AND METHODS
14
3.1 Materials
The followings are the materials used for the analysis:
i. Water sample
ii. Sediment samples
iii. Test tube
iv. iv. Detergent
v. Ice boxes
vi. Polyethylene bottles
vii. Eckman grabber
viii. Mortar and pestle
ix. Wide mouthed plastic containers
Reagent
10% HNO3
HCL (ag)
3.1.1 Study Area
15
The study was carried out in Unyeada, Andoni River and its Sediments
water and sediments. These sites were chosen due to their proximity to
catchments with activities that potentially contribute to pollution of the
river.
3.2 Method (Procedures)
3.2.1 Collection of Water Sample
Water samples were collected in polyethylene bottles. The water samples
were then taken to the Department of Science Laboratory Technology,
Kenule Beeson Saro-Wiwa Polytechnic, Bori for analysis. Each sample was
collected by submerging the sample container into the river at about 50-
30mm below the surface with an open end facing against the current flow
direction.
3.2.2 Preparation of Water Sample
500-mL. polyethylene sample containers were cleaned using livid
detergent, followed by rinsing with tap water until they were free of
detergent. In the field, the containers were rinsed three times with water
at the sampling point before collection.
The sample was double-distilled with 2ml trioxonitrate (iv) HNO3. Water
samples were acidified with 10% HNO3, brought to the Department of
16
Science Laboratory Technology, Kenule Beeson Saro-Wiwa Polytechnic,
Bori and kept refrigerated until analyzed.
3.2.3 Collection of Sediment Samples
Sediment samples were collected using Eckman grabber and put into wide
mouthed plastic containers, kept in ice boxes containing wet ice and
stored at -80°C until analysis.
3.2.4 Preparation of Sediment Samples
The sediment samples were sub-sampled for dry weight determination at
105°C. The samples were freeze-dried, finely crushed and homogenized
using mortar and pestle.
3.2.5 Determination of Heavy Metals in Water Samples
100ml of water samples were measured and poured in a test tube, 10ml
of HNO, and 1 ml of HCL were added in the culture test tube, and then
incubated at 80°C in a water bath, after total digestion and subsequent
cooling; the solution was diluted to 50ml and analyzed for heavy metals
concentration using Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (AAS).
3.2.6 Determination of Heavy Metals in Sediment Samples
17
The sediment samples were freeze-dried, finely crushed and homogenized
using mortar and pestle. About 0.5g of the homogenized sample was
digested in 10 ml of HNO3 and HCl in the ratio of 3:1. 1 ml of HCL was
poured in a culture test tube and incubated at 80% in a water bath, after
then it was digested and allowed to cool. The solution was then diluted to
50ml and analyzed for heavy metals in a closed system using Atomic
Absorption Spectrophotometry.
3.3 Data Analysis
The results obtained shall be analyzed using the spread sheet package
(excel software). Data shall be presented in form of graph, bar chart etc.
to show the heavy metals concentration in Unyeada Andoni Rivers State.
CHAPTER FOUR
18
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4.1 Result
In this section the results of the experiment shall be presented to show
the mean concentration of heavy metals in Unyeada Andoni Rivers State
and Sediments.
Results shall be presented in form of table and bar chart.
Table 4.1: Mean concentration of heavy metal concentration in Unyeada
Adoni River and its sediments.
S/N PARAMETERS WATER SEDIMENTS W.H.O LIMITS
1 Chromium, Cr (mg/l) 0.181 0.241 0.05
2 Zinc. Zn (mg/l) 0.06 1.020 3.00
3 Mercury, Hg (mg/l) 0.001 0.009 0.05
4 Lead Pb (mg/l) 0.023 0.341 0.01
5 Cadmium, Cd (mg/l) 0.009 0.025 0.003
1.2
19
1
0.8
0.6 WATER
0.4 SEDIMENTS
0.2
Figure 4.1: Mean Concentration of Heavy Metals in Unyeada Andoni River
3.5
2.5
1.5
1 WATER
0.5 SEDIMENTS
0 W.H.O LIMITS
Cr (mg/l) Zn(mg/l) Hg(mg/l) Pb(mg/l) Cd(mg/l)
Figure 4.2: Shows the mean concentration of heavy metals in Unyeada,
Andoni River and its Sediments with their WHO permissible limits.
4.2 Discussion
20
This study was conducted to investigate the mean concentration of heavy
metals in Unyeada, Andoni River and Sediments. The result of the analysis
indicated that the concentration of heavy metals were less than toxicity
threshold unit in Unyeada, Andoni River and sediments.
The high level of Chromium in water (0.181) and sediments (0.241) which
was above the WHO permissible limit.
Chromium is very toxic by inhalation and dermal route and causes lungs
cancer, nasal irritation, nasal ulcer and hypersensitivity reactions like
contact dermatitis and asthma. Chromium affects various components of
the immune system and may results in immunostimulation or
immunosuppression.
CHAPTER FIVE
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
21
5.1 Conclusion
The concentration of trace metals from two different samples ie, water
and sediments of Unyeada, Andoni River were determined. Our results
indicate that there were differences in trace metal concentration in water
and sediment samples. In the river, heavy metal concentrations were
highest in the sediment samples than the water samples. There are
various sources of heavy metals; some originates from anthropogenic
activities like draining of sewerage, dumping of Hospital wastes and
recreational activities. Conversely, metals also occur in small amounts
naturally and may enter into aquatic system through leaching of rocks,
airborne dust, forest fires and vegetation. As heavy metals cannot be
degraded, they are continuously being deposited and incorporated in
water, sediment and aquatic organisms, thus causing heavy metal
pollution in water bodies.
5.2 Recommendations
The followings are the recommendations to the study:
i. Water should be analyzed before consumption
ii. Government should enact a law that prohibit indiscriminate
dumping of refuge or waste in the water bodies
22
iii. Water bodies should be maintained and monitored to prevent
contamination.
iv. An agency should be created by the government to monitor the
water bodies to prevent water pollution.
v. There should be an enlightenment campaign to educate the
masses on the effect of heavy metals contamination on human
health.
REFERENCES
23
Ahmad, JU, Goni, M.A. (2014). Heavy metal contamination in water, soil,
and vegetables of the industrial areas in Dhaka, Bangladesh Environ.
Monit. Assess 2010, 166, 347-357.
Duruibe, J.O.; Ogwuegbu, M.O.C.; Ekuru, J.N. (2017). Heavy metal
pollution and human biotoxic effects. Int. J. Phys, 2, 112-118.
Edokpayl, J.N., Oliyo, J.O., Maagati, T.A., Fotgieter, N. (2019) Temporal
Variations in Physico-Chemical and Microbiological Characteristics of
Mvudi River, South Africa. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 12, 4128-
4140.
Edokpayi, J.N., Odiyo, J.O.; Olasoji, S.O (2015). Assessment of heavy
metal contamination of Dzindi River, in Limpopo Province, South
Africa. Int. J. Nat. Sci, 2, 185-194.
Edokpayi, J.N.; Odiyo, J.O.; Msagati, T.A.M.; Popoola, E.O. (2019).
Removal Efficiency of Faccal Indicator Organisms, Nutrients and
Heavy Metals from a Peri-Urban Wastewater Treatment Plant in
Thohoyandou, Limpopo Province, South Africa. Int. J. Environ. Res.
Public Health 12, 7300-7320.
Heleba, S (2014). Access to sufficient water in South Africa: How far have
we come? Law, Dev. Democracy 2012, 15, 244-278.
24
Iqbal, M.A.; Gupta, S.G. (2019). Studies on Heavy Metal Ion Pollution of
Ground Water Sources as an Effect of Municipal Solid Waste Dumping.
Afr. J. Basic Appl. Sci., 1, 117-122.
Jadia, C.D.; Fulekar, M.H. (2019). Phytoremediation of heavy metals:
Recent techniques. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2009, 8, 921-928.
Janıp, L. (2019). Hazards of heavy metal contamination. Br. Med. Bull.
2003, 68, 67-182.
Mrezewa, J., Misi, T.; van Rensburg, L.D. (2019). Characterization of
rainfall at a semi-arid ecotope in the Limpopo Province (South Africa)
and its implications for sustainable crop production. Water SA, 36, 19-
26.
Mohiuddin, K.M.; Ogawa, Y.; Zakir, H.M.; Otomo, K.; Shikazono, N (2018).
Heavy metals contamination in water and sediments of an urban river
in a developing country. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 4,723-736.
Odiyo, J.O.; Phangisa, J.I.; Makungo, R. (2019). Rainfall-runoff modelling
for estimating Latonyanda River flow contributions to
Luvuvhu River downstream of Albasini Dam. Phys. Chem. Earth, 50-52, 5-
13.
25
Odiyo, J.O.; Bapela, H.M.; Mugwedi, R.; Chimuka, L. (2019). Metals in
environmental media: A study of trace and platinum group metals in
Thohoyandou, South Africa, 31, 581-588.
Samarghandi, M.; Nouri, J.; Mesdaghinia, A.R.; Mahvi, A.H.; Nasseri, S.;
Vaezi, F (2018). Efficiency Removal of Phenol, Lead and Cadmium by
Means of UV/TiO2/H2O2 Processes. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol, 4,
19-26.
Song, M.; Chu, S.; Letcher, R.J.; Seth, R (2019). Fate, partitioning, and
mass loading of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) during the
treatment processing of municipal sewage. Environ. Sci. Technol, 40,
6241-6246.
Sardar, K.; Ali, S.; Hameed, S.; Afzal, S.; Fatima, S.; Shakoor, M.B.;
Bharwana, S.A.; Tauqeer, H.M. (2019). Heavy Metals Contamination
and what are the Impacts on Living Organisens Greener J. Environ.
Manage. Public Safety, 2, 172-179.
Vergas, [Link], Migliavacca, [Link], De Melo, AC, Hom. R.C. Guidobono, R.R.;
De Sa Ferreira, L.C.F., Pestana, [Link].D. (2018) Genotoxicity
assessment in aquatic environments under the influence of heavy
metals and organic contaminants. Mutat, 490, 141-158.
26
Varol, M., Sen, B. (2019). Assessment of nutrient and heavy metal
contamination in surface water and sediments of the upper Tigris
River, Turkey. Catena, 92, 1-12.
Wepener, V.; van Vuren, J.H.J.; du Preez, H.H. (2018) Uptake and
distribution of a copper, iron and zinc mixture in gill, liver and plasma
of a freshwater teleost, Tilapia sparrmanii. Water SA, 27, 99-108.
Water Research Commission. Water and the environment. Water Wheel
2014, 13, 8-14.
27