Course CQI Report
Spring 2023
Table of Contents
1 CQI Feedback Submission Notice ...................................................................................... 3
2 List of Courses .................................................................................................................... 3
3 Summary CQI Report ......................................................................................................... 3
3.1 EEE-121 .............................................................................................................................. 3
3.2 BUS-217 ............................................................................................................................. 5
3.3 EEE-320 .............................................................................................................................. 7
3.4 EEE-321 .............................................................................................................................. 9
3.5 EEE-323 ............................................................................................................................ 11
3.6 EEE-453 ............................................................................................................................ 13
3.7 EEE-454 ............................................................................................................................ 13
2|Page
1 CQI Feedback Submission Notice
A notice for the submission of the following feedback forms was provided to all the faculty members of
the department of EEE. Please refer to the attachment to this report for the notice.
2 List of Courses
Offered courses in Spring 2023 semester from selected for PO attainment:
1. EEE - 121
2. BUS - 217
3. EEE - 320
4. EEE - 321
5. EEE - 323
6. EEE – 453
7. EEE - 454
3 Summary CQI Report
The CQI report for each of the courses listed above is provided below in briefly summarized tables.
3.1 EEE-121
Faculty and Course Information
Course Title Electrical Circuit II
Course Code EEE 121
Semester/Trimester Spring 2023
Faculty Name Shaikhul Arefin Khan
Batch(es) EEE-S-72+73, 76-A
Total Registered Students 19
3|Page
CO Attainment Information
§ Number of COs: 3
§ Number of Domain Levels Addressed: 1
§ Number of POs Addressed: 2
§ COs Achieved (>50%): 1
§ Lowest CO Achievement: CO2 – 32%
CO No. Percentage of Students with Attainment Status
>50% Attainment
CO1 53 ✅
CO2 32 ❌
CO3 42 ❌
PO Attainment Information
§ POs Achieved (>50%): 1
§ Lowest PO Achievement: PO(b) – 36.84%
PO No. Related CO(s) Percentage of Mean PO
Attainments
PO(a) CO1 52.63%
PO(b) CO2, CO3 36.84%
Summary of Student Feedback on Course
§ Most of the students attended over 80% of the course lectures.
§ Most of the course lecture and delivery related questions were answered positively.
§ Most of the assessment and communication related questions were answered positively.
§ Most difficult CO from the student responses – CO2.
§ Most of the responses did not suggest any changes to improve CO attainment.
4|Page
Comparison to Previous Attainment
Previous Improvement Suggestions
§ Assessment marks should be redistributed between COs.
§ Assign challenging assessments for CO1
§ CO2 and CO3 assessment techniques should be modified.
Suggestions for Improvement
§ Modify CO2 and CO3 assessment tools for better results.
§ Improve the prerequisite course to provide adequate knowledge of Thevenin’s theorem and AC
circuit-based problems.
3.2 BUS-217
Faculty and Course Information
Course Title Professional Ethics
Course Code BUS 217
Semester/Trimester Spring 2023
Faculty Name Prof. Abu M Wahidullah
Batch(es) EEE-S-77+78-A
Total Registered Students
5|Page
CO Attainment Information
§ Number of COs: 5
§ Number of Domain Levels Addressed: 8
§ Number of POs Addressed: 5
§ COs Achieved (>50%): 2
§ Lowest CO Achievement: CO4 – 0%, CO5 – 11%
CO No. Percentage of Students with Attainment Status
>50% Attainment
CO1 80 ✅
CO2 80 ✅
CO3 40 ❌
CO4 52 "
!
CO5 0 $
PO Attainment Information
§ POs Achieved (>50%): 1
§ Lowest PO Achievement: PO(g) – 10%
PO No. Related CO(s) Percentage of Mean PO
Attainments
PO(b) CO2 63%
PO(f) CO3 42%
PO(g) CO4 52%
PO(h) CO1, CO5 40%
Summary of Student Feedback on Course
§ Most of the students attended over 80% of the course lectures.
§ Most of the course lecture and delivery related questions were answered positively.
§ Most of the assessment and communication related questions were answered positively.
§ Most difficult CO from the student responses – CO4.
6|Page
§ Most of the responses suggested that more elaboration on the standard code of conducts for
engineers should be presented through exemplary case studies.
Comparison to Previous Attainment
Previous Improvement Suggestions
§ Previous attainment data and improvement suggestions are not available.
Suggestions for Improvement
§ Assessment-related questions for CO5 should be improved with practical case studies. This will in
turn improve the attainment of target PO(h).
§ The number of POs addressed by the course should be reassessed for better attainment. The COs
and POs are currently misaligned .
§ The attainment calculation is erroneous. Kindly use the standard excel template provided by RUA.
3.3 EEE-320
Faculty and Course Information
Course Title Electrical Service Design
Course Code EEE-320
Semester/Trimester Spring 2023
Faculty Name Md. Mokarram Hossain Chowdhury
Batch(es) EEE-S-72+73, 76-A
Total Registered Students 12
7|Page
CO Attainment Information
§ Number of COs: 3
§ Number of Domain Levels Addressed: 2
§ Number of POs Addressed: 3
§ COs Achieved (>50%): 1
§ Lowest CO Achievement: CO3 – 26%
CO No. Percentage of Students with Attainment Status
>50% Attainment
CO1 87% ✅
CO2 27% ❌
CO3 26% ❌
PO Attainment Information
§ POs Achieved (>50%): 1
§ Lowest PO Achievement: PO(d) – 26.32%
PO No. Related CO(s) Percentage of Mean PO
Attainments
PO(c) CO1 86
PO(e) CO3 86
PO(f) CO2 86
Summary of Student Feedback on Course
§ Most of the students attended over 80% of the course lectures.
§ Most of the course lecture and delivery related questions were answered positively.
§ Most of the assessment and communication related questions were answered positively.
§ Most difficult CO from the student responses – CO3.
§ Most of the responses did not suggest any changes to improve CO attainment.
Comparison to Previous Attainment
8|Page
Previous Improvement Suggestions
§ Assessment marks should be redistributed between COs.
§ Challenging assessments should be assigned for CO1.
§ CO2 and CO3 assessment should be modified to attain better levels.
Suggestions for Improvement
§ Kindly check the PO attainment levels reported in the faculty feedback form.
§ Modify CO2 and CO3 assessment tools for better results.
§ Adjust the prerequisite course to enhance comprehension of electrical distribution networks.
3.4 EEE-321
Faculty and Course Information
Course Title Power System I
Course Code EEE-321
Semester/Trimester Spring 2023
Faculty Name Raihan Ahmed
Batch(es) EEE-S-72+73, 76-A
Total Registered Students 19
CO Attainment Information
§ Number of COs: 4
9|Page
§ Number of Domain Levels Addressed: 2
§ Number of POs Addressed: 3
§ COs Achieved (>50%): 1
§ Lowest CO Achievement: CO4 – 26%
CO No. Percentage of Students with Attainment Status
>50% Attainment
CO1 53% ✅
CO2 32% ❌
CO3 42% ❌
CO4 26% ❌
PO Attainment Information
§ POs Achieved (>50%): 1
§ Lowest PO Achievement: PO(d) – 26.32%
PO No. Related CO(s) Percentage of Mean PO
Attainments
PO(a) CO1 52.63
PO(b) CO2, CO3 36.84
PO(d) CO4 26.32
Summary of Student Feedback on Course
§ Most of the students attended over 80% of the course lectures.
§ Most of the course lecture and delivery related questions were answered positively.
§ Most of the assessment and communication related questions were answered positively.
§ Most difficult CO from the student responses – CO4.
§ Most of the responses did not suggest any changes to improve CO attainment.
Comparison to Previous Attainment
10 | P a g e
Previous Improvement Suggestions
§ Assessment marks should be redistributed between COs.
§ Challenging assessments should be assigned for CO1 and CO2 while rubrics for CO3 and CO4
should be rephrased to improve.
Suggestions for Improvement
§ CO1 and CO2-related assessment tools must be modified for optimum results.
§ The target PO s for the course should be reconsidered. Mostly PO(d) – related to research
literature does not seem to be aligned aptly with this course.
§ The prerequisite course should be improved to impart sufficient and significant knowledge related
to complex power and impedance related contents.
3.5 EEE-323
Faculty and Course Information
Course Title Communication Theory
Course Code EEE-323
Semester/Trimester Spring 2023
Faculty Name Dr. Dilshad Mahjabeen
Batch(es) EEE-S-72+73, 76-A
Total Registered Students 14
11 | P a g e
CO Attainment Information
§ Number of COs: 4
§ Number of Domain Levels Addressed: 5
§ Number of POs Addressed: 4
§ COs Achieved (>50%): 3
§ Lowest CO Achievement: CO4 – 13%
CO No. Percentage of Students with Attainment Status
>50% Attainment
CO1 4% ❌
CO2 100% ✅
CO3 100% ✅
CO4 100% ✅
PO Attainment Information
§ POs Achieved (>50%): 4
§ Lowest PO Achievement: PO(b) – 13%
PO No. Related CO(s) Percentage of Mean PO
Attainments
PO(b) CO1 13
PO(d) CO2 85
PO(e) CO3 85
PO(i) CO4 85
Summary of Student Feedback on Course
§ Most of the students attended over 80% of the course lectures.
§ Most of the course lecture and delivery related questions were answered positively.
§ Most of the assessment and communication related questions were answered positively.
§ Most difficult CO from the student responses – CO1.
§ Some responses noted that more mathematical problems should be included to improve the
attainment of COs.
12 | P a g e
Comparison to Previous Attainment
Previous Improvement Suggestions
§ Assessment marks should be redistributed between COs.
§ CO1 and CO3 assessment tools should be modified to better suit the target POs of the course.
Suggestions for Improvement
§ CO1 assessment tools must be modified to include more complex engineering based
mathematical problems appropriate for PO(b).
§ Marks assigned for evaluation of CO2, CO3 and CO4 are very insignificant compared to the total
marks. Necessary adjustments should be made to adjust the attainment levels.
§ Due insignificant marks assigned to evaluate the mentioned COs, corresponding POs attainment
levels are not correct. Kindly make necessary adjustments required for improvement.
3.6 EEE-453
The faculty member did not provide any feedback for the course.
3.7 EEE-454
Faculty and Course Information
Course Title Power Electronics Lab
Course Code EEE-454
Semester/Trimester Spring 2023
Faculty Name Mohammad Rabiul Awal
13 | P a g e
Batch(es) EEE-S-70&71-A
Total Registered Students 14
CO Attainment Information
§ Number of COs: 4
§ Number of Domain Levels Addressed: 1
§ Number of POs Addressed: 4
§ COs Achieved (>50%): 1
§ Lowest CO Achievement: CO1, CO2, CO3 (0 %)
CO No. Percentage of Students with Attainment Status
>50% Attainment
CO1 0% ❌
CO2 0% ❌
CO3 0% ❌
CO4 100% ✅
PO Attainment Information
§ POs Achieved (>50%): 1
§ Lowest PO Achievement: PO(f), PO(g) and PO(k) – 0%
PO No. Related CO(s) Percentage of Mean PO
Attainments
PO(f) CO1 0
PO(g) CO2 0
PO(i) CO4 100
PO(k) CO3 0
Summary of Student Feedback on Course
§ Most of the students attended over 80% of the course lectures.
§ Most of the course lecture and delivery related questions were answered positively.
§ Most of the assessment and communication related questions were answered positively.
14 | P a g e
§ Most difficult CO from the student responses – CO1, CO2 and CO3.
§ Most of the responses did not suggest any changes to improve CO attainment.
Comparison to Previous Attainment
Previous Improvement Suggestions
§ Previous feedback information is not available.
Suggestions for Improvement
§ The marks assigned to evaluate each of the CO is very much insignificant.
§ Evaluating CO4 with only 5% marks of the total produced a wrong attainment result for PO(i).
This should be updated to increase the assessment marks allocated for evaluation.
§ Misalignment of CO and PO is identified from the course outline, and it should be corrected by
making necessary adjustments.
§ Target POs for the course should be re-evaluated and modified.
Prepared By
Raihan Uddin Ahmed
Lecturer, EEE, SUB
Member CQI Committee
15 | P a g e
