Financial Instruments
Financial Instruments
RECOGNITION
An entity shall recognize a financial asset or a financial liability in its statement of financial position when
and only when the entity becomes party to the contractual provisions of the instrument. On initial
recognition the entity shall also classify financial asset or financial liability as per guidance discussed later
in this chapter.
Examples:
- Entity B transfers cash to Entity A as a collateral for a borrowing transaction. The cash is not legally
segregated from Entity A’s assets. Therefore, Entity A recognizes the cash as an asset and a payable
to Entity B, while Entity B derecognizes the cash and recognizes a receivable from Entity A.
- Assets to be acquired and liabilities to be incurred as a result of a firm commitment to purchase or
sell goods or services are generally not recognized until at least one of the parties has performed
under the agreement. For example, an entity that receives a firm order does not generally recognize
an asset (and the entity that places the order does not recognize a liability) at the time of the
commitment but, instead, delays recognition until the ordered goods or services have been shipped,
delivered or rendered.
- Planned future transactions, no matter how likely, are not assets and liabilities because the entity has
not become a party to a contract.
Financial assets which are debt instruments of other entity [e.g. investment in debentures]
1) Amortized cost
A financial asset shall be measured, except for 3(ii) below, at amortized cost if both of the following
conditions are met:
(i) the financial asset is held within a business model whose objective is to hold financial assets in order
to collect contractual cash flows and
(ii) the contractual terms of the financial asset give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely
payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding.
Amortized cost
The amount at which the financial asset or financial liability is measured at initial recognition minus
the principal repayments, plus or minus the cumulative amortization using the effective interest
method of any difference between that initial amount and the maturity amount and, for financial
assets, adjusted for any loss allowance.
(ii) the contractual terms of the financial asset give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely
payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding.
Business model
Any entity’s business model is determined at a level that reflects how groups of financial assets are
managed together to achieve a particular business objective. It does not depend on management’s
intentions for an individual instrument. However, an entity may have more than one business models
for managing its financial instruments. For example, an entity may hold a portfolio of investments that
it manages to collect contractual cash flows and another portfolio of investments that it manages in
order to trade to realize fair value changes.
This assessment is not performed on the basis of scenarios that the entity does not reasonably expect
to occur, such as so-called ‘worst case’ or ‘stress case’ scenarios. For example, if an entity expects that
it will sell a particular portfolio of financial assets only in a stress case scenario, that scenario would not
affect the entity’s assessment of the business model for those assets if the entity reasonably expects
that such a scenario will not occur.
Although the objective of an entity’s business model may be to hold financial assets in order to collect
contractual cash flows, the entity need not hold all of those instruments until maturity. Thus an entity’s
business model can be to hold financial assets to collect contractual cash flows even when sales of
financial assets occur or are expected to occur in the future.
Financial assets which are equity instruments of other entity [e.g. investment in shares]
An entity shall classify financial assets as subsequently measured at:
1) Fair value through other comprehensive income
2) Fair value through profit or loss
A financial asset shall be measured at fair value through P&L (default method) unless an entity has made
an irrevocable election, at initial recognition, for particular investments in equity instruments if these are
not held for trading to present subsequent changes in fair value in OCI.
An entity shall classify all financial liabilities as subsequently measured at amortized cost except for:
(a) Financial liabilities, including derivatives that are liabilities, measured at fair value through P&L
An entity may, at initial recognition, irrevocably designate a financial liability as measured at fair
value through P&L if either:
- It eliminates or significantly reduces an accounting mismatch; or
- A group of financial liabilities is managed and its performance is evaluated on a fair value basis
in accordance with a documented risk management or investment strategy.
(b) Financial liabilities that arise when a transfer of a financial asset does not qualify for derecognition or
when the continuing involvement approach applies.
(c) Financial guarantee contracts.
(d) Commitments to provide a loan at a below-market interest rate.
(e) Contingent consideration recognized by an acquirer in a business combination.
INITIAL MEASUREMENT
Financial assets
Financial liabilities
Transaction costs
Incremental costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition, issue or disposal of a financial asset
or financial liability. An incremental cost is one that would not have been incurred if the entity had not
acquired, issued or disposed of the financial instrument.
Financial assets
(ii) If asset is classified as - At each reporting date and on de-recognition, the asset shall be
measured at fair value measured at fair value with any gain or loss recognized in other
through OCI comprehensive income.
- Interest income using effective interest rate shall be recognized in
profit or loss (i.e. same as calculated in amortized cost).
- Any foreign exchange gain/loss on amortized cost measured in
foreign currency shall be recognized in P&L.
- Cumulative fair value gain or loss, previously recognized in OCI, shall
be reclassified to profit or loss on de-recognition of the asset.
(All amounts recognized in P&L would be the same which would have
been recognized had the asset been measured at amortized cost)
(iii) If asset is classified as - At each reporting date and on de-recognition, the asset shall be
measured at fair value measured at fair value with any gain or loss recognized in profit or
through profit or loss loss.
- It is a monetary item, therefore, as per IAS 21 its exchange gain or
loss shall be recognized in P&L.
- Actual interest received is recognized in profit or loss. (Need of
accrual concept is accounted for accordingly)
Financial liabilities
Types Treatment
(i) If liability is classified as - The liability shall be measured at amortized cost using effective
measured at amortized cost interest rate method.
(default measurement) - Interest expense using effective interest rate shall be recognized in
P&L.
- Any gain or loss on derecognition shall be recognized in P&L.
(ii) If liability is classified as - At each reporting date, the liability shall be measured at fair value.
measured at fair value - Any change in fair value attributable to change in own credit risk is
through profit or loss recognized in OCI [Amount presented in OCI shall not be
subsequently transferred to P&L, however, the entity may transfer
the cumulative gain or loss within equity e.g. retained earnings]. The
remaining amount of change in the fair value of the liability shall be
presented in P&L. However, if it creates or enlarges accounting
mismatch, then entire fair value gain or loss shall be recognized in
P&L.
- Actual interest paid is recognized in profit or loss. (Need for accrual
concept is accounted for accordingly)
Estimating change in fair value of liability attributable to change in own credit risk:
Multiple methods can be used to estimate the amount of change in fair value attributable to change in
own credit risk. If the only significant relevant changes in market conditions for a liability are changes
in an observed (benchmark) interest rate, the amount of change in fair value attributable to change in
own credit risk can be estimated in following steps:
1) First find “Instrument-specific component” of IRR of the liability as
= IRR of liability at start of period (i.e. a market rate of return which is calculated using fair value of
liability and the contractual cash flows at the start of the period) LESS observed benchmark interest
rate (e.g. KIBOR) at start of period
PRACTICE QUESTIONS
Question 1
Following independent situations relate to financial assets:
(1) A Limited (AL) holds investments to collect their contractual cash flows. The funding needs of AL are predictable and
the maturity of investments matches to estimated funding needs. However, AL would sell an investment in particular
circumstances, perhaps to fund unanticipated capital expenditure, or because the credit rating of the instrument falls
below that required by AL’s investment policy.
(2) B Limited (BL) purchases portfolios of financial assets such as loans. If payment on the loans is not made on a timely
basis, the entity attempts to realize the contractual cash flows through various follow-up measures. BL’s objective is
to collect the contractual cash flows and it does not manage any of the loans in this portfolio with an objective of
realizing cash by selling them.
(3) C Limited (CL) has a business model with the objective of originating loans to customers and subsequently selling
those loans to a securitisation vehicle. The securitisation vehicle issues instruments to investors. CL controls the
securitisation vehicle and thus consolidates it. The securitisation vehicle collects the contractual cash flows from the
loans and passes them on to its investors. It is assumed for the purposes of this example that the loans continue to
be recognised in the consolidated statement of financial position because they are not derecognised by the
securitisation vehicle.
(4) D Limited (DL) expects to pay a cash outflow in ten years to fund capital expenditure and invests excess cash in short-
term financial assets. When the investments mature, DL reinvests the cash in new short-term financial assets. DL
maintains this strategy until the funds are needed, at which time DL uses the proceeds from the maturing financial
assets to fund the capital expenditure. Only sales that are insignificant in value occur before maturity (unless there is
an increase in credit risk).
(5) E Limited (EL) expects to incur capital expenditure in a few years’ time. EL invests its excess cash in short and long-
term financial assets so that it can fund the expenditure when the need arises. Many of the financial assets have
contractual lives that exceed EL’s anticipated investment period. EL will hold financial assets to collect the contractual
cash flows and, when an opportunity arises, it will sell financial assets to re-invest the cash in financial assets with a
higher return.
(6) F Bank holds financial assets to meet its everyday liquidity needs. The bank actively manages the return on the
portfolio in order to minimize the costs of managing those liquidity needs. That return consists of collecting
contractual payments as well as gains and losses from the sale of financial assets. F Bank holds financial assets to
collect contractual cash flows and sells financial assets to reinvest in higher yielding financial assets or to better match
the duration of its liabilities. In the past, this strategy has resulted in frequent sales activity and such sales have been
significant in value. This activity is expected to continue in the future
Required:
Briefly discuss how each of the above assets should be classified?
Question 2
Following independent situations relate to financial assets (i.e. investments in bonds):
(1) Bond A has a stated maturity date. Payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding are linked
to an inflation index of the currency in which the bond is issued.
(2) Bond B is a variable interest rate instrument with a stated maturity date that permits the borrower to choose the
market interest rate on an ongoing basis. For example, at each interest rate reset date, the borrower can choose to
pay three-month LIBOR for a three-month term or one-month LIBOR for a one-month term.
(3) Bond C has a stated maturity date and pays a variable market interest rate. That variable interest rate is capped.
(4) Bond D is a full recourse loan and is secured by collateral.
(5) Bond E is convertible into fixed number of equity instruments of the issuer.
(6) Bond F is a perpetual bond but the issuer may call the instrument at any point and pay the holder the par amount
plus accrued interest due. It pays a market interest rate but payment of interest cannot be made unless the issuer is
able to remain solvent immediately afterwards. Deferred interest does not accrue additional interest.
Required:
For each of the above assets, briefly discuss whether contractual cashflows solely comprise of principal and interest?
Question 3
On 1 January 2018 Abacus Co purchases a debt instrument for its fair value of Rs. 100,000. The debt instrument is due to
mature on 31 December 2022 at par. The instrument has a face value of Rs. 125,000 and the instrument carries fixed
interest at 4.72% that is paid annually. (The effective interest rate is 10%.)
Required:
Show extracts of Income statement and Balance sheet for each of the five years till December 31, 2022.
Question 4
On May 14, 2018 Zain Limited (ZL) acquired 5,000 shares of a listed company for Rs. 27.50 per share (including Rs. 1.50
per share as broker’s commission). On that date the fair value of share was Rs. 25 per share. ZL had purchased these
shares with the intention of holding in long term. Moreover, it made an irrevocable election for designation as fair value
through other comprehensive income. On June 30, 2018 (i.e. year-end) fair value of shares moved to Rs. 28 per share.
This price further increased to Rs. 33 per share on June 30, 2019. On August 1, 2019 ZL sold 3,000 shares for Rs. 31 per
share. On June 30, 2020 fair value moved to Rs. 37 per share.
Required:
Question 5
In January 1, 2018 Wolf Limited (WL) purchased 10 million shares of a listed company at a price of Rs. 25 per share
(whereas fair value was Rs. 25.50 per share). WL also paid transaction costs of Rs. 15 million. On November 30, 2018 WL
received a dividend of Rs. 4 per share. WL’s year end is December 31. At December 31, 2018, the shares were trading at
Rs. 28.
Required:
Show the financial statements extracts of WL at December 31, 2018 relating to the investment in shares if:
(i) The shares were bought for short term trading.
(ii) The shares were bought as a source of dividend income and were the subject of an irrevocable election at initial
recognition to recognize them at fair value through other comprehensive income.
Question 6
On January 1, 2018, Tokyo Limited (TL) bought Rs. 100,000 (nominal value) 5% bonds for Rs. 95,000 (fair value), incurring
transactions costs of Rs. 2,000. Interest is received at end of every year. The bonds will be redeemed at a premium of Rs.
5,960 over nominal value on December 31, 2020. The effective rate of interest is 8%. The fair value of the bond was as
follows:
Question 7
On January 1, 2018, Sialkot Limited (SL) bought 100 Euro-dollar bonds at a price of $ 50 each and incurred transaction
cost of $ 0.5 per bond. The bonds will be redeemed at a premium of 20% over face value of $ 40 each after four years.
Coupon rate is 10%. The effective rate of interest is 6.80%.
The exchange rates and fair value of the bond were as follows:
Required:
Journalize all transactions for the years ending December 31, 2018 and 2019 if:
(a) SL's business model is to hold bonds until the redemption date and collect contractual cash flows.
(b) SL's business model is to hold bonds until redemption but also to sell them if investments with higher returns become
available.
Question 8
Decent Limited (DL) issued following bonds on January 1, 2019:
1) Face value = Rs. 150,000
Issued at a discount of 5%
Coupon rate = 7%
Redemption after 4 years at a premium of 10%
Effective interest rate = 10.734%
2) Face value = Rs. 80,000
Issued at a premium of 10%
Issue costs = Rs. 2,000
Contractual cash flows:
31-12-19 – Rs. 9,500
31-12-20 – Rs. 41,500
31-12-21 – Rs. 52,700
Effective interest rate = 8.111%
3) Face value = Rs. 100,000
Coupon rate = zero
Issued at a discount of 25%
Redemption after 4 years at par
Effective interest rate = 7.457%
Required:
(a) Prepare complete schedules for amortized cost calculation for each bond.
(b) Journalize all the transactions for the year ending December 31, 2019.
(c) Show extracts of SOFP and SOCI for the year ending December 31, 2019.
Question 9
On January 1, 2018 Engro Limited (EL) issued debentures (nominal value Rs. 50,000) at a premium of 10%. Coupon rate is
10% payable at end of every year. A broker commission of 4% of nominal value was paid on issuance. These debentures
will be redeemed at a premium of 5% after 3 years.
Required:
(a) Calculate effective interest rate to be used for amortized cost calculation.
(b) Journalize all transactions for all three years.
Question 10
On January 1, 2018 Alpha Limited (AL) issued 9% debentures at nominal value of Rs. 80,000 to finance a certain investment
in assets. The management has decided to classify these debentures to be measured at fair value through profit and loss.
AL’s credit rating was also changed in subsequent years due to some factors. These debentures were revalued to fair
values as follows:
Required:
(a) Show extracts of Statement of comprehensive income and Statement of financial position for the years ending
December 31, 2018 and 2019.
(b) Journalize above transactions for the years ending December 31, 2018 and 2019.
Question 11
Beta Limited (BL) issued 8% debentures some years ago. These debentures will be redeemed at par (i.e. Rs. 100,000) on
December 31, 2023. On January 1, 2019 the fair value of debentures was Rs. 100,000 showing a market rate of return of
8% (i.e. IRR of fair value and contractual cashflows over remaining life). On that date KIBOR was 5%.
On December 31, 2019 KIBOR moved to 5.75% and fair value of BL’s debentures moved to Rs. 95,972 showing a market
rate of return of 9.25%.
On December 31, 2020 KIBOR moved to 5.50% and fair value of BL’s debentures moved to Rs. 95,026 showing a market
rate of return of 10%.
Required:
Calculate fair value gain/loss to be recognized in OCI and P&L for the years ending December 31, 2019 and 2020.
SOLUTIONS
Solution No. 1
(1) Although AL may consider, among other information, the financial assets' fair values from a liquidity perspective (i.e.
the cash amount that would be realised if AL needs to sell assets), AL’s objective is to hold the financial assets and
collect the contractual cash flows. Therefore, these assets shall be classified as measured at amortized cost.
(2) The objective of BL’s business model is to hold financial assets to collect contractual cash flows. Therefore, these
assets shall be classified as measured at amortized cost.
(3) The consolidated group originated the loans with the objective of holding them to collect the contractual cash flows.
However, CL has an objective of realising cash flows on the loan portfolio by selling the loans to the securitisation
vehicle, so for the purposes of its separate financial statements it would not be considered to be managing this
portfolio in order to collect the contractual cash flows and thus classified as measured at fair value through OCI.
(4) The objective of DL’s business model is to hold financial assets to collect contractual cash flows. Selling financial
assets is only incidental to DL’s business model. Therefore, these assets shall be classified as measured at amortized
cost.
(5) The objective of the business model is achieved by both collecting contractual cash flows and selling financial assets.
EL decides on an ongoing basis whether collecting contractual cash flows or selling financial assets will maximise the
return on the portfolio until the need arises for the invested cash. Therefore, these assets shall be measured at fair
value through other comprehensive income.
(6) The objective of the business model is to maximise the return on the portfolio to meet everyday liquidity needs and
F Bank achieves that objective by both collecting contractual cash flows and selling financial assets. In other words,
both collecting contractual cash flows and selling financial assets are integral to achieving the business model’s
objective. Therefore, these assets shall be measured at fair value through other comprehensive income.
Solution No. 2
(1) The contractual cash flows are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding. Linking
payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding to an unleveraged inflation index resets the
time value of money to a current level. In other words, the interest rate on the instrument reflects ‘real’ interest.
Thus, the interest amounts are consideration for the time value of money on the principal amount outstanding.
However, if the interest payments were indexed to another variable such as the debtor’s performance (eg the
debtor’s net income) or an equity index, the contractual cash flows are not payments of principal and interest on the
principal amount outstanding.
(2) The contractual cash flows are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding as long
as the interest paid over the life of the instrument reflects consideration for the time value of money, for the credit
risk associated with the instrument and for other basic lending risks and costs, as well as a profit margin. The fact that
the LIBOR interest rate is reset during the life of the instrument does not in itself disqualify the instrument. However,
if the borrower is able to choose to pay a one-month interest rate that is reset every three months, the interest rate
is reset with a frequency that does not match the tenor of the interest rate. Consequently, the time value of money
element is modified. Similarly, if an instrument has a contractual interest rate that is based on a term that can exceed
the instrument’s remaining life (for example, if an instrument with a five-year maturity pays a variable rate that is
reset periodically but always reflects a five-year maturity), the time value of money element is modified. That is
because the interest payable in each period is disconnected from the interest period.
are payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding as long as the interest reflects
consideration for the time value of money, for the credit risk associated with the instrument during the term of the
instrument and for other basic lending risks and costs, as well as a profit margin.
(4) The fact that a full recourse loan is collateralized does not in itself affect the analysis of whether the contractual cash
flows are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding.
(5) The holder would analyze the convertible bond in its entirety. The contractual cash flows are not payments of
principal and interest on principal amount outstanding because they reflect a return that is inconsistent with a basic
lending arrangement i.e. the return is linked to the value of the equity of the issuer.
(6) The contractual cashflows are not payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding because
the issuer may be required to defer interest payments and additional interest does not accrue on those deferred
interest amounts. As a result, interest amounts are not consideration for the time value of money on the principal
amount outstanding.
Solution 3
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
-------------------------------------- Rs. --------------------------------------
Income statement - extracts
Current assets
Investment - - - 119,028 -
W-1
Opening Closing
Date Interest Cashflow
balance balance
[A] [B = A x 10%] [C] [A + B - C]
Solution 4
Dr. Cr.
-------- Rs. -------
14-05-18 Investment [5,000 x (25 + 1.50)] 132,500
P&L [5,000 x (27.50 – 25 – 1.50)] 5,000
Cash [5,000 x 27.50] 137,500
[Initial recognition]
Solution 5
(i)
Rs. million
SOCI – extracts
Dividend income [10m x Rs. 4] 40.00
Gain on initial recognition [10m x Rs. 0.50] 5.00
Transaction cost (15.00)
Fair value gain [(Rs. 28 – Rs. 25.50) x 10m] 25.00
SOFP – extracts
Non-current assets
Investment [10m x Rs. 28] 280.00
(ii)
SOCI – extracts
Dividend income [10m x Rs. 4] 40.00
Gain on initial recognition 5.00
Other comprehensive income:
Fair value gain [(Rs. 28 x 10m - (Rs. 25.50 x 10m + Rs. 15m)] 10.00
SOFP – extracts
Equity
Fair value reserve 10.00
Non-current assets
Investment [10m x Rs. 28] 280.00
Solution 6
(a) Asset shall be measured at amortized cost
Dr. Cr.
-------- Rs. -------
01-01-18 Investment [95,000 + 2,000] 97,000
Cash 97,000
[Initial recognition]
W-1
Opening Closing Fair Fair value
Date Interest Cashflow OCI
balance balance value reserve
[A] [B = A x 8%] [C] [D = A + B - C] [E] [F = E - D] [Change in F]
Solution 7
(a) Measured at amortized cost Dr. Cr.
-------- Rs. -------
01-01-18 Investment [(50 + 0.5) x 100 x Rs. 150] 757,500
Cash 757,500
[Initial recognition]
W-1
------------------------ $ Amortized cost ------------------------- Rupees
amortized
Date Opening Closing
Interest Cashflow cost
balance balance (translated)
[A] [B = A x 6.8%] [C] [D = A + B - C] [E]
31-12-18 5,050 343 400 4,993 758,936 [4,993 x 152]
31-12-19 4,993 340 400 4,933 754,749 [4,933 x 153]
W-2
------------------------ Translated values (ignoring FV change) -------------------------
Date Opening Exchange Closing
Interest Cashflow
balance gain/(loss) balance
(balancing figure)
--------------------------------------------- Rs. ------------------------------------------------
31-12-18 757,500 52,136 60,800 10,100 758,936
31-12-19 758,936 52,020 61,200 4,993 754,749
W-3
Amortized Fair value Fair value
Date OCI
cost (translated) reserve
[E] [F] [G = F – E] [Change in G]
--------------------------- Rs. -----------------------------------
31-12-18 758,936 775,200 16,264 16,264
[5,100 x 152]
31-12-19 754,749 734,400 (20,349) (36,613)
[4,800 x 153]
Solution 8
(a) ------------------------------- Rs. -----------------------------
Bond - 1
Opening Closing
Date Interest Cashflow
balance balance
[A] [B = A x 10.734%] [C] [A + B - C]
Bond - 3
Opening Closing
Date Interest Cashflow
balance balance
[A] [B = A x 7.457%] [C] [A + B - C]
Bond - 2
Bond - 3
Dr. Cr.
-------- Rs. -------
01-01-19 Cash [100,000 x 75%] 75,000
Bonds 75,000
[Initial recognition]
Solution No. 9
(a) ------ 5% ------ -------- 10% -------
Factor PV Factor PV
Initial recognition [50,000 x 1.1 - 50,000 x 4%] (53,000) 1.000 (53,000) 1.000 (53,000)
Year 1 payment [50,000 x 10%] 5,000 0.952 4,760 0.909 4,545
Year 2 payment [50,000 x 10%] 5,000 0.907 4,535 0.826 4,130
Year 3 payment [50,000 x 10% + 50,000 x 1.05] 57,500 0.864 49,680 0.751 43,183
5,975 (1,143)
(b)
Dr. Cr.
-------- Rs. -------
01-01-18 Cash 53,000
Debentures 53,000
[Initial recognition]
W-1
Date Opening balance Interest Cashflow Closing balance
Solution No. 10
(a) 2018 2019
-------------- Rs. ----------------
SOCI – extracts
Interest expense [80,000 x 9%] (7,200) (7,200)
Fair value gain / (loss) [W-1] (5,000) (1,000)
Other comprehensive income:
Fair value gain / (loss) (3,000) 7,000
SOFP - extracts
Equity
Fair value reserve (3,000) 4,000
Non-current liabilities
Debentures 88,000 82,000
(b)
Dr. Cr.
-------- Rs. -------
01-01-18 Cash 80,000
Debentures 80,000
[Initial recognition]
Solution No. 11
Calculation for 2019
01-01-19
Market rate for valuation 8%
Cashflows PV
(Rs.) (Rs.)
It is only shown for students
31-12-19 8,000 7,407
knowledge about calculation of
31-12-20 8,000 6,859
market value which is already
31-12-21 8,000 6,351 given in questions
31-12-22 8,000 5,880
31-12-23 108,000 73,503
Market value [A] 100,000
IRR 8.00%
KIBOR 5.00%
Instrument-specific component for 2019 3.00%
31-12-19
Market rate for valuation 9.25%
Cashflows PV
(Rs.) (Rs.) It is only shown for students
31-12-20 8,000 7,323 knowledge about calculation of
31-12-21 8,000 6,703 market value which is already
31-12-22 8,000 6,135 given in questions
31-12-23 108,000 75,812
Market value [B] 95,972
KIBOR 5.75%
Instrument-specific component 3.00%
Discount rate to find OCI portion 8.75%
Present value:
Rate to find OCI portion 8.75%
Cashflows PV
(Rs.) (Rs.)
31-12-20 8,000 7,356
31-12-21 8,000 6,764
31-12-22 8,000 6,220
31-12-23 108,000 77,216
[C] 97,557
IRR 9.25%
KIBOR 5.75%
Instrument-specific component for 2020 3.50%
31-12-20
KIBOR 5.50%
Instrument-specific component 3.50%
Discount rate to find OCI portion 9.00%
Present value:
Rate to find OCI portion 9.00%
Cashflows PV
(Rs.) (Rs.)
31-12-21 8,000 7,339
31-12-22 8,000 6,733
31-12-23 108,000 83,396
[C] 97,469
It is a purchase or sale of a financial asset under a contract whose terms require delivery of the asset
within the time frame established generally by regulation or convention in the marketplace concerned.
(e.g. Pakistan Stock Exchange)
Following two methods are allowed for accounting for regular way purchase or sale of financial assets:
1) Trade date accounting
2) Settlement date accounting
Trade date
The trade date is the date that an entity commits itself to purchase or sell an asset.
Settlement date
The settlement date is the date that an asset is delivered to or by an entity.
On trade date Financial asset is recognized at the amount as already studied earlier
depending upon the class of asset (i.e. initial measurement) and a
corresponding payable is recognized as payment has not yet been
made.
Fair value changes at year-end Gain/loss on changes in fair value of the financial asset is accounted for
(if it arrives between Trade as studied earlier depending upon the class of asset (i.e. as follows):
date and Settlement date) – Not applicable (for amortized cost class)
– Recognized in OCI (for FV through OCI class)
– Recognized in P&L (for FV through P&L class)
Dr. Payable
Cr. Cash
Dr. Receivable
Cr. Financial asset
Dr. / Cr. OCI (if it would be classified as measured at FV through OCI)
Dr./Cr. P&L (if it would be classified as measured at FV through P&L)
Fair value changes at year-end No entry as the financial asset is already derecognized.
(if it arrives between Trade
date and Settlement date)
Dr. Cash
Cr. Receivable
Fair value changes at year-end Though no investment has yet been recognized even then a gain/loss
(if it arrives between Trade on changes in fair value of the financial asset (except where it will be
date and Settlement date) classified as measured at amortized cost) is accounted for as follows (as
studied earlier depending upon the class of asset to be used):
Dr. Receivable
Cr. OCI (if it would be classified as measured at FV through OCI)
Cr. P&L (if it would be classified as measured at FV through P&L
On trade date Although the financial asset is not de-recognized but a gain or loss on
changes in fair value of the financial asset is accounted for as follows:
– Not applicable (for amortized cost class)
– Recognized in OCI (for FV through OCI class)
– Recognized in P&L (for FV through P&L class)
Fair value changes at year- No further gain/loss on fair value changes is recognized because the
end (if it arrives between entity’s right to changes in the fair value ceased on trade date.
Trade date and Settlement
date)
Following terms should be understood first to discuss the topic of impairment of financial assets:
Key terms
Credit loss
The difference between all contractual cash flows that are due to an entity in accordance with the
contract and all the cash flows that the entity expects to receive (i.e. all cash shortfalls), discounted at
the original effective interest rate (or credit-adjusted effective interest rate for purchased or
originated credit-impaired financial assets).
IAS 36 covers impairment of most of the non-current assets (except for financial assets) and it operates
an incurred loss model. This means that impairment is recognized only when an event has occurred which
has caused a fall in recoverable amount of asset. However, IFRS 9 operates an expected loss model. It is
no longer necessary for a credit event to have occurred before credit losses are recognized. Instead, an
entity always accounts for expected credit losses, and changes in those expected credit losses. The
amount of expected credit losses is updated at each reporting date to reflect changes in credit risk since
initial recognition and, consequently, more timely information is provided about expected credit losses.
2. An entity shall measure the allowance for expected credit losses at each reporting date:
If the credit risk on that financial instrument If the credit risk on that financial instrument
has increased significantly since initial has NOT increased significantly since initial
recognition: recognition:
Important
o Changes in credit risk can be assessed on an individual or collective basis considering all
reasonable and supportable information.
o When making the assessment of changes in credit risk, an entity shall use the change in the risk
of a default occurring over the expected life instead of the change in the amount of expected
credit losses.
o If reasonable and supportable forward-looking information is available without undue cost or
effort, an entity cannot rely solely on past due information when determining whether credit
risk has increased significantly since initial recognition.
o There is a rebuttable presumption that the credit risk on a financial asset has increased
significantly since initial recognition when contractual payments are more than 30 days past
due. However, ‘30 days past due’ is not a must for assessment of credit risk.
3. If previously a loss allowance has been recognized at lifetime expected credit losses but now the
change in credit risk is not significant since initial recognition, then entity shall measure the loss
allowance at 12-months expected credit losses at current reporting date.
4. Initial recognition of loss allowance as well as any change in the amount of allowance for expected
credit losses (or reversal) shall be recognized in profit or loss as an impairment gain or loss.
In case of financial asset measured at amortized cost:
Dr. Impairment loss (P&L)
Cr. Allowance for expected credit loss (it is a contra asset account)
This “allowance for expected credit loss” is deducted from gross carrying amount of financial asset
so that a net position is presented in statement of financial position.
In case of financial asset (which is a debt instrument of another entity) measured at FV through OCI
Dr. Impairment loss (P&L)
Cr. Allowance for expected credit loss [OCI]
Since loss is credited to OCI, hence no allowance is deducted from gross carrying amount of
financial asset.
Notes: Above entries are given for impairment loss. These should be reversed in case of impairment
gain.
(b) Simplified approach for trade receivables, contract assets (IFRS 15) and lease receivables
In case of Trade receivable and contract assets In case of Trade receivable and contract assets
which do not contain a significant financing which contain a significant financing component
component: and Lease receivables:
Simplified approach shall be followed Simplified approach may be followed if the entity
chooses this treatment as an accounting policy.
[Otherwise general approach will be used]
1. An allowance for expected credit losses on initial recognition as well as at each reporting date at an
amount equal to lifetime expected credit loss shall be recognized.
2. Any change in the amount of allowance for expected credit losses (or reversal) shall be recognized in
profit or loss as an impairment gain or loss.
This “allowance for expected credit loss” is deducted from gross carrying amount of financial asset
so that a net position is presented in statement of financial position.
Notes: Above entry is given for impairment loss. This should be reversed in case of impairment gain.
2) Credit-impaired asset
Evidence that a financial asset is credit-impaired include observable data about the following events:
(e) the disappearance of an active market for that financial asset because of financial difficulties; or
(f) the purchase or origination of a financial asset at a deep discount that reflects the incurred credit
losses.
It may not be possible to identify a single discrete event—instead, the combined effect of several events
may have caused financial assets to become credit-impaired.
1. Interest revenue shall be calculated by applying the normal effective interest rate to the amortized
cost of the financial asset
Interest income = (Gross carrying amount – Loss allowance) x normal effective interest rate
2. Measurement and accounting for subsequent allowance for impairment loss would be same as
studied earlier for general approach. However, an adjustment would be needed (otherwise amortized
cost table will not by applying effective interest rate to opening balance of loss allowance as follows:
Exam note:
1 and 2 above are easier to handle if accounted for in a compound entry.
3. If in subsequent reporting periods, the credit risk on the financial instrument improves so that the
financial asset is no longer credit-impaired (e.g. improvement in the borrower’s credit rating) then we
would revert to measuring the interest income by applying the effective interest rate to the gross
carrying amount as before.
1. In some cases, a financial asset is considered credit-impaired at initial recognition because the credit
risk is very high and in a case of purchase it is acquired at a deep discount. Credit-adjusted effective
interest rate is calculated using all contractual cashflows adjusted for initial estimate of the lifetime
expected credit losses.
2. Interest revenue shall be calculated by applying credit-adjusted effective interest rate to the
amortized cost (i.e. net carrying amount) of the financial asset from initial recognition.
3. An entity shall only recognize the cumulative changes in lifetime expected credit losses since initial
recognition as a loss allowance for purchased or originated credit-impaired financial assets. At each
reporting date, an entity shall recognize in profit or loss the amount of the change in lifetime expected
credit losses as an impairment gain or loss. An entity shall recognize favourable changes in lifetime
expected credit losses as an impairment gain, even if the lifetime expected credit losses are less than
the amount of expected credit losses that were included in the estimated cash flows on initial
recognition.
4. If expected credit losses are to be discounted then credit-adjusted effective interest rate determined
at initial recognition shall be used.
PRACTICE QUESTIONS
Question 1
On December 29, 2019 an entity commits itself to purchase a financial asset for Rs. 1,000, which is its fair value on
commitment (trade) date. On December 31, 2019 (i.e. year-end) and on January 4, 2020 (settlement date) the fair value
of the asset is Rs. 1,025 and Rs. 1,038 respectively.
Required:
Journal entries for the above transactions for each of the following cases:
Case – I Financial asset will be measured at amortized cost
Case – II Financial asset will be measured at fair value through OCI
Case – III Financial asset will be measured at fair value through P&L
Under following accounting policies:
(a) Trade date accounting
(b) Settlement date accounting
Question 2
On December 29, 2019 an entity commits itself to sell a financial asset for Rs. 1,010, which is its fair value on commitment
(trade) date. It had been purchased on January 1, 2019 and has a carrying amount of Rs. 1,000 on trade date. On December
31, 2019 (i.e. year-end) and on January 4, 2020 (settlement date) the fair value of the asset is Rs. 1,025 and Rs. 1,030
respectively.
Required:
Journal entries for the above transactions for each of the following cases:
Case – I Financial asset was measured at amortized cost
Case – II Financial asset was measured at fair value through OCI
Case – III Financial asset was measured at fair value through P&L
Under following accounting policies:
(c) Trade date accounting
(d) Settlement date accounting
Question 3
On December 29, 2019 an entity enters into a contract to sell Debenture A, which is measured at amortized cost, in
exchange for Bond B, which will be held for trading and thus will be measured at fair value through P&L. Debenture A had
a carrying amount of Rs. 10,000 on commitment date.
Fair values of both assets were as follows:
Debenture A Bond B
Trade date (i.e. 29-12-19) Rs. 10,100 Rs. 10,100
Year end (i.e. 31-12-19) Rs. 10,120 Rs. 10,090
Settlement date (i.e. 04-01-20) Rs. 10,130 Rs. 10,070
Entity follows settlement date accounting for assets measured at amortized cost and trade date accounting for assets
held for trading.
Required:
Journal entries for the above transactions.
Question 4
On January 1, 2018, Nobita Limited (NL) bought Rs. 200,000 (nominal value) 10% bonds, incurring transactions costs of
1% of purchase price. The bonds will be redeemed at a premium of Rs. 25% over nominal value on December 31, 2020.
The effective rate of interest is 16.6386%. The fair value of the bond was as follows:
The investment was not considered to be credit-impaired at any stage. The relevant expected credit losses, for use in
measuring the loss allowance were as follows:
Date Rs.
January 1, 2018 7,000
December 31, 2018 10,000
December 31, 2019 12,000
Required:
Journalize all above transactions over all relevant years if:
(a) NL's business model is to hold bonds until the redemption date and collect contractual cash flows.
(b) NL's business model is to hold bonds until redemption but also to sell them if investments with higher returns become
available.
Question 5
An entity purchased debentures of Rs. 450,000 on January 1, 2019, on which date they are not considered to be credit-
impaired. The financial asset is classified at amortized cost and has an effective interest rate of 10%. Coupon payment of
Rs. 30,000 was duly received on December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2020. The following additional information is also
available on December 31, 2019:
2019 2020
Lifetime expected credit loss if there is a default (i.e. LGD) 30% 35%
[% of gross carrying amount]
Probability of default occurring within 12-months 10% 11%
Probability of default occurring within lifetime 12% 15%
Required:
Extracts of SOFP and SOCI for the year ending December 31, 2019 and 2020 if risk assessment on each year end shows:
(a) There is no significant increase in credit risk since initial recognition
(b) There is a significant increase in credit risk since initial recognition
(c) The asset has become credit-impaired
Question 6
On January 1, 2019 Happy Limited (HL) invested in 5,000 debentures issued by Sad Limited (SL). Each debenture is
redeemable at par (i.e. Rs. 100) after 4 years. Coupon rate was 9% payable annually. Issue price was Rs. 98 per debenture
(i.e. equal to the fair value). Transaction costs incurred amount to Rs. 2,500. Effective rate of interest was 9.4678%.
HL classified this investment at amortized cost. The investment was not credit-impaired on initial recognition. On initial
recognition HL estimated the lifetime expected credit losses to be Rs. 15,000 and the 12-month expected credit losses to
be Rs. 3,125.
On December 31, 2019, due to high debt ratio and declining profit margins, SL issued a warning to its creditors that it is
undergoing a business restructuring process aimed at saving the business from bankruptcy. As a result, the directors of
HL determined that there was a significant increase in credit risk since the initial recognition. On that date, revised
estimates were as follows:
- The lifetime expected credit losses had increased to Rs. 17,500; and
- The 12-months expected credit loss had increased to Rs. 5,000
On December 31, 2020, the credit risk for the investment remained significantly higher than at initial recognition. On that
date, revised estimates were as follows:
- The lifetime expected credit losses had increased to Rs. 20,000; and
- The 12-months expected credit loss had increased to Rs. 8,000
Required:
Journal entries for the year ending December 31, 2019 and 2020 if risk assessment shows:
(a) The asset was not credit-impaired at either December 31, 2019 or December 31, 2020.
(b) The asset became credit-impaired at December 31, 2019 and remained so at December 31, 2020.
Question 7
On December 1, 2019 Good Limited (GL) entered into a contract with a customer for Rs. 500,000. All performance
obligations were satisfied on that date. There is no significant financing component in the contract.
At December 31, 2019 GL does not believe that the increase in credit risk since initial recognition is significant.
If default occurs, GL expects to lose 80% of the gross carrying amount of the receivable. The customer pays in full on
January 15, 2020.
01-12-19 31-12-19
Probability of default over the next 12-months 4% 5%
Probability of default over the lifetime 6% 7%
Required:
Journal entries of above transactions.
Question 8
On December 31, 2019 Mango Limited (ML) has a portfolio of receivables of Rs. 30 million. The trade receivables do not
have a significant financing component in accordance with IFRS 15.
ML has constructed following provision matrix to determine expected credit losses on the portfolio of receivables:
Required:
Journal entry to record impairment loss on December 31, 2019.
Question 9
On January 1, 2019 Almond Limited (AL) purchased 10% debentures (having nominal value of Rs. 60,000) at a price of Rs.
50,000. These bonds are redeemable at par on December 31, 2022. AL’s management had estimated at initial recognition
that only 85% of contractual cashflows would be recovered. As a result of which, the investment was considered as
purchased credit-impaired financial asset and credit-adjusted effective rate was estimated at 10.627%.
On December 31, 2019 Rs. 4,800 was received in respect of coupon payment of 2019 and AL’s revised its estimate of
expected default on contractual cashflows to 20%.
On December 31, 2020 Rs. 4,900 was received in respect of coupon payment of 2020 and AL’s revised its estimate of
expected default on contractual cashflows to 18%.
On December 31, 2021 Rs. 5,300 was received in respect of coupon payment of 2021 and AL’s revised its estimate of
expected default on contractual cashflows to 12%.
Finally on December 31, 2022 the debentures were redeemed at Rs. 58,000.
Required:
All journal entries till December 31, 2022.
SOLUTIONS
Solution No. 1
(a) Trade date accounting
Case – I Case – II Case – III
29-12-19
31-12-19
04-01-20
31-12-19
04-01-20
Solution No. 2
(a) Trade date accounting
Case – I Case – II Case – III
29-12-19
31-12-19
04-01-20
31-12-19
04-01-20
Solution 3
Dr. Cr.
-------- Rs. -------
29-12-19 Bond B 10,100
Payable 10,100
[initial recognition]
Solution 4
(a) Asset shall be measured at amortized cost Dr. Cr.
-------- Rs. -------
01-01-18 Investment [200,000 x 1.01] 202,000
Cash 202,000
[Initial recognition]
(b) Asset shall be measured at fair value through OCI Dr. Cr.
-------- Rs. -------
01-01-18 Investment [200,000 x 1.01] 202,000
Cash 202,000
[Initial recognition]
W-1
Opening Closing Fair Fair value
Date Interest Cashflow OCI
balance balance value reserve
[A] [B = A x 16.6386%] [C] [D = A + B - C] [E] [F = E - D] [Change in F]
Solution 5
(a) 2019 2020
----------- Rs. ----------
SOCI - extracts
Interest income (W-1) 45,000 46,500
Expected loss [Change in allowance(W-1)] (13,950) (4,588)
SOFP - extracts
Non-current assets
Investment (W-1) 451,050 462,962
(b)
SOCI - extracts
Interest income (W-1) 45,000 46,500
Expected loss [Change in allowance(W-1)] (16,740) (8,539)
SOFP - extracts
Non-current assets
Investment (W-1) 448,260 456,221
(c)
SOCI - extracts
Interest income (W-1) 45,000 44,826
Expected loss [Change in allowance(W-1)] [25,279 – 16,740 – 1,674] (16,740) (6,865)
SOFP - extracts
Non-current assets
Investment (W-1) 448,260 456,221
Loss allowance:
Impairment loss 13,950 16,740 16,740
Balance as at 31-12-19 13,950 16,740 16,740
[B x 30% x 10%] [B x 30% x 12%] [B x 30% x 12%]
[C] 451,050 448,260 448,260
Loss allowance:
Balance as at 01-01-20 13,950 16,740 16,740
Interest adjustment - - 1,674
Impairment loss 4,588 8,539 6,865
Balance as at 31-12-20 18,538 25,279 25,279
[D x 35% x 11%] [D x 35% x 15%] [D x 35% x 15%]
462,962 456,221 456,221
Solution 6
(a) Dr. Cr.
-------- Rs. -------
01-01-19 Investment [5,000 x 98 + 2,500] 492,500
Cash 492,500
[Initial recognition]
Loss allowance:
Initial amount 3,125 3,125
Impairment loss at year end 14,375 14,375
Balance as at 31-12-19 17,500 17,500
[C] 476,629 476,629
Loss allowance:
Balance as at 01-01-20 17,500 17,500
Interest adjustment - 1,657
Impairment loss 2,500 843
Balance as at 31-12-20 20,000 20,000
475,912 475,912
Solution 8
Dr. Cr.
-------- Rs. million -------
31-12-19 Impairment loss [P&L] 0.23
Loss allowance 0.23
[Impairment loss for 2019]
W-1
Gross
Default rate Allowance
amount
(Rs. million) (Rs. million)
Current 15.00 0.30% 0.05
1-30 days 7.50 1.60% 0.12
31-60 days 4.00 3.60% 0.14
61-90 days 2.50 6.60% 0.17
More than 90 days 1.00 10.60% 0.11
0.58
Opening balance 0.35
0.23
Solution 9
Dr. Cr.
-------- Rs. -------
01-01-19 Investment 50,000
Cash 50,000
[Initial recognition]
W-1 Rs.
Initial amount 50,000
Interest income [50,000 x 10.627%(W-2)] 5,314
Cashflow (W-2) (5,100)
Gross balance 31-12-19 50,214
Loss allowance:
Impairment loss 2,992
Balance 31-12-19 (W-2.1) 2,992
47,221
Loss allowance:
Balance 01-01-20 2,992
Interest adjustment 318
Impairment loss (1,451)
Balance 31-12-20 (W-.2.2) 1,859
48,590
Loss allowance:
Balance 01-01-21 1,859
Interest adjustment 198
Impairment loss (3,722)
Balance 31-12-21 (W-.2.2) (1,665)
52,376
Loss allowance:
Balance 01-01-22 (1,665)
Interest adjustment (177)
Impairment loss 1,842
Balance 31-12-22 -
-
W-2
Contractual Recovery Expected
Credit-adjusted effective rate cashflows expected cashflows
Transaction price (50,000) (50,000)
31-12-19 6,000 85% 5,100
31-12-20 6,000 85% 5,100
31-12-21 6,000 85% 5,100
31-12-22 66,000 85% 56,100
Credit-adjusted effective rate 10.627%
RE-CLASSIFICATION
Financial assets
1. When and only when an entity changes it business model for managing financial assets, it shall
reclassify all affected financial assets. Such changes are expected to be very infrequent. A change in
entity’s business model will occur only when an entity either begins or ceases to perform an activity
that is significant to its operations.
Examples:
- An entity has a portfolio of commercial loans that it holds to sell in the short term. The entity
acquires a company that manages commercial loans and has a business model that holds the loans
in order to collect the contractual cash flows. The portfolio of commercial loans is no longer for
sale, and the portfolio is now managed together with the acquired commercial loans and all are
held to collect the contractual cash flows.
- A financial services firm decides to shut down its retail mortgage business. That business no longer
accepts new business and the financial services firm is actively marketing its mortgage loan
portfolio for sale.
Exam note
Since reclassification is applied to “change in business model” only, therefore technically it is not
allowed for:
- Equity investments.
- Investments in debt instruments for which fair value through P&L class was elected irrevocably
on initial recognition.
3. The reclassification shall be applied prospectively from the reclassification date. The entity shall not
restate any previously recognized gains, losses (including impairment gains or losses) or interest.
Reclassification date
The first day of the first reporting period following the change in business model that results in an
entity reclassifying financial assets.
Fair value through OCI - The asset shall be measured at fair value on reclassification date.
- Any resulting fair value gain or loss shall be recognized in OCI.
- The effective interest rate and the measurement of expected credit
losses shall not be adjusted as a result of the reclassification.
Amortized cost - The asset shall be measured at fair value on reclassification date.
- Any resulting fair value gain or loss shall be recognized in P&L.
- The fair value at reclassification date becomes its new gross carrying
amount.
- The effective interest rate is calculated based on the fair value of the
asset at reclassification date.
- For the purpose of initial recognition of loss allowance,
reclassification date is treated as the date of initial recognition.
Amortized cost - The asset shall be measured at fair value on reclassification date.
- The cumulative gain or loss previously recognized in OCI shall be
removed from equity and adjusted against the asset.
Financial liabilities
If a part of a financial asset is transferred, then following de-recognition rules should be applied to the
part only if any one of the following conditions are met:
(i) The part comprises only specifically identified cash flows from an asset (e.g. when an entity enters
into an interest rate stirp whereby the counterparty obtains the right to the interest cash flows but
not the principal cash flows from a debt instrument, the de-recognition rules are applied to interest
cashflows);
(ii) The part comprises only a fully proportionate share of the cash flows from an asset (e.g. when an
entity enters into an arrangement whereby the counterparties obtain the rights to 90% share of all
cashflows of a debt instrument, the de-recognition rules are applied to 90% of those cashflows); OR
(iii) The part comprises only a fully proportionate share of specifically identified cashflows from an asset
(e.g. when an entity enters into an arrangement whereby the counterparties obtain the rights to
90% share of interest cashflows of a debt instrument, the de-recognition rules are applied to 90%
of those interest cashflows).
In all other cases de-recognition rules should be applied to the financial asset in its entirety.
In following guidance, term “financial asset” refers to either a part of a financial asset (as identified above)
or a financial asset in its entirety.
(b) if the entity retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership
The entity shall continue to recognize the financial asset and recognize a financial liability for the
consideration received. In subsequent periods, the entity shall recognize any income on the
transferred asset and any expense incurred on the liability.
Examples
(a) a sale and repurchase transaction where the repurchase price is a fixed price or the sale
price plus a lender’s return;
(b) a securities lending agreement;
(c) a sale of a financial asset together with a total return swap that transfers the market risk
exposure back to the entity;
(d) a sale of a financial asset together with a deep in-the-money put or call option; and
(e) a sale of short-term receivables in which the entity guarantees to compensate the
transferee for credit losses that are likely to occur.
(c) if the entity neither transfers nor retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership
[For example sale and repurchase transactions (i.e. repo transactions)]
The entity shall determine whether it has retained control of the financial asset.
(i) if the entity has not retained control (i.e. the transferee has the practical ability to sell the
financial asset), it shall derecognize the financial asset and recognize separately as assets or
liabilities any rights and obligations created or retained in the transfer.
(ii) if the entity has retained control (i.e. the transferee does not have the practical ability to sell
the financial asset), it shall continue to recognize the financial asset to the extent of its
continuing involvement in the financial asset. It also recognizes an associated liability.
5. On de-recognition of a part of an asset, the previous carrying amount of the larger financial asset shall
be allocated between the part that continues to be recognized and the part that is de-recognized, on
the basis of the relative fair values of parts on the date of transfer. The difference between:
(a) The carrying amount (measured at date of de-recognition) allocated to the part derecognized;
and
(b) The consideration received for the part derecognized (including any new asset obtained less any
new liability)
Shall be recognized in P&L.
If the asset, which is being partially de-recognized, has cumulative gain/loss in OCI, then the balance in
OCI will also be allocated based on the relative fair values of parts on the date of transfer.
Factoring
Factoring means sale of receivables to another party called “factor”. Factor provides debt collection
services and also provide a certain portion as advance. Factor service may be “with recourse” or
“without recourse”.
With recourse – Since bad debt risk is borne by the entity, therefore, any advance received is considered
as a loan and receivables are not derecognized.
Without recourse – Since bad debt risk is borne by the factor, therefore, receivables are derecognized.
Write-off
An entity shall directly reduce the gross carrying amount of a financial asset when the entity has no
reasonable expectations of recovering a financial asset in its entirety or a portion thereof. A write-off
constitutes a de-recognition event.
For example, an entity plans to enforce the collateral on a financial asset and expects to recover no
more than 30 per cent of the financial asset from the collateral. If the entity has no reasonable
prospects of recovering any further cash flows from the financial asset, it should write off the remaining
70 per cent of the financial asset.
1. An entity shall remove a financial liability (or a part of a financial liability) from its statement of
financial position when, and only when, it is extinguished—i.e. when the obligation specified in the
contract is discharged (e.g. payment) or cancelled or expires (i.e. legally released from primary
responsibility for the liability).
2. An exchange between an existing borrower and lender of debt instruments with substantially
different terms shall be accounted for as an extinguishment of the original financial liability and the
recognition of a new financial liability. Similarly, a substantial modification of the terms of an existing
financial liability or a part of it (whether or not attributable to the financial difficulty of the debtor)
shall be accounted for as an extinguishment of the original financial liability and the recognition of a
new financial liability.
Substantial change
The terms are substantially different if the discounted present value of the cash flows under the
new terms, including any fees paid net of any fees received (only fees paid or received between the
borrower and lender) and discounted using the original effective interest rate, is at least 10 per cent
different from the discounted present value of the remaining cash flows of the original financial
liability.
Scope
An entity shall not apply this Interpretation to transactions in situations where:
(a) the creditor is also a direct or indirect shareholder and is acting in its capacity as a direct or indirect
existing shareholder.
(b) the creditor and the entity are controlled by the same party or parties before and after the
transaction and the substance of the transaction includes an equity distribution by, or contribution
to, the entity.
(c) extinguishing the financial liability by issuing equity shares is in accordance with the original terms
of the financial liability. (e.g. convertibles)
Consensus
1. When equity instruments issued to a creditor as a consideration paid to extinguish all or part of a
financial liability are recognized initially, an entity shall measure them at:
(a) the fair value of the equity instruments issued, unless that fair value cannot be reliably
measured.
(b) If the fair value of the equity instruments issued cannot be reliably measured then the equity
instruments shall be measured to reflect the fair value of the financial liability extinguished.
3. If only a part of financial liability is extinguished and part of the consideration also relates to the
modification of the remaining portion, then the consideration paid shall be allocated between the
part extinguished and part retained.
1. An entity shall recalculate the gross carrying amount of the financial asset and shall recognize a
modification gain or loss in profit or loss.
2. The gross carrying amount of the financial asset shall be recalculated as the present value of the
renegotiated or modified contractual cash flows that are discounted at the financial asset’s original
effective interest rate (or credit-adjusted effective interest rate for purchased or originated credit-
impaired financial assets).
3. Any costs or fees incurred adjust the carrying amount of the modified financial asset and are
amortized over the remaining term of the modified financial asset.
4. An entity shall assess whether there has been a significant increase in the credit risk of the financial
instrument by comparing:
(a) the risk of a default occurring at the reporting date (based on the modified contractual terms);
and
(b) the risk of a default occurring at initial recognition (based on the original, unmodified contractual
terms).
5. If the contractual cash flows on a financial asset have been renegotiated or otherwise modified, but
the financial asset is not derecognized, that financial asset is not automatically considered to have
lower credit risk. An entity shall assess whether there has been a significant increase in credit risk
since initial recognition on the basis of all reasonable and supportable information that is available
without undue cost or effort.
1. The modified asset is considered a ‘new’ financial asset. Accordingly, the date of the modification shall
be treated as the date of initial recognition of that financial asset when applying the impairment
requirements to the modified financial asset. This typically means measuring the loss allowance at an
amount equal to 12-month expected credit losses until the credit risk is significantly increased
afterwards.
2. However, in some unusual circumstances following a modification that results in derecognition of the
original financial asset, there may be evidence that the modified financial asset is credit-impaired at
initial recognition, and thus, the financial asset should be recognized as an originated credit-impaired
financial asset.
PRACTICE QUESTIONS
Question 1
On January 1, 2017, Tokyo Limited (TL) invested Rs. 500,000 (i.e. equal to face value) in 8% debentures. These debentures
would be redeemed at a premium of 10%. The effective interest was 8.6687%.
Initially these debentures were classified as measured at amortized cost. However, on June 30, 2019 management of TL
changed its business model and decided to re-classify these bonds as measured at fair value through P&L.
The fair values of the debentures were as follows:
The debentures have never been credit-impaired and there have been no significant increase in credit risk since initial
recognition. The expected credit losses were determined as follows:
Required:
Journal entries for the years ending December 31, 2019 and 2020.
Question 2
Sigma Limited (SL) purchased bonds in a company some years ago. The bonds were classified at fair value through profit
or loss since they were held for trading. The bonds have a face value of Rs. 500,000 and coupon rate of 10% per annum.
The bonds would be redeemed at a premium of 20% on December 31, 2025.
On August 1, 2019, SL decided to change the classification from fair value through P&L to amortized cost.
The fair values of the bonds were as follows:
The debentures have never been credit-impaired and there have been no significant increase in credit risk since initial
recognition. The expected credit losses were determined as follows:
Required:
Journal entries for the years ending December 31, 2019 and 2020.
Question 3
Mango Limited (ML) purchased debentures of a company on January 1, 2018 for Rs. 147,408 (i.e. fair value). The face
value of debentures was Rs. 100,000 and coupon rate was 20% per annum. These would be redeemed at a premium of
23% on December 31, 2021. Effective interest rate was 10%.
On August 1, 2019, ML decided to change the classification from fair value through OCI to amortized cost.
The fair values of the debentures were as follows:
The debentures have never been credit-impaired and there have been no significant increase in credit risk since initial
recognition. The expected credit losses were determined as follows:
Required:
Journal entries for the years ending December 31, 2019 and 2020.
Question 4
On April 30, 2020 Alpha Limited (AL) sold 3,000 shares of a company at a price of Rs. 65 per share (fair value of share on
that date was Rs. 68). AL also incurred a transaction cost of Rs. 0.70 per share in sale transaction.
These shares had been purchased last year and were re-measured on December 31, 2019 to Rs. 62 per share.
Required:
Journal entries to record sale of shares on April 30, 2020 if AL measures its investments in shares at:
(a) Fair value through P&L
(b) Fair value through OCI
Question 5
On April 30, 2020 Beta Limited (BL) sold 2,000 debentures of a company at a price of Rs. 115 per debenture (fair value of
debenture on that date was Rs. 118). BL also incurred a transaction cost of Rs. 2.50 per debenture.
These debentures had been purchased on January 1, 2018 for Rs. 105 per debenture and also incurred transaction costs
of Rs. 6,000. The effective rate was 12% whereas annual coupon payment was Rs. 15 per debenture.
The fair values of the debentures were as follows:
Date Fair value (Rs.)
December 31, 2018 220,000
December 31, 2019 226,000
Required:
Journal entries to record sale of debentures on April 30, 2020 if BL measures its investments in debentures at:
(a) Amortized cost
(b) Fair value through OCI
Question 6
On January 1, 2020 an entity has a portfolio of loans whose coupon and effective interest rate is 10% and whose principal
amount and amortized cost is Rs. 10,000. On that date, it enters into a transaction in which, in return for a payment of Rs.
9,115, the transferee obtains the right to Rs. 9,000 of any collections of principal plus interest thereon at 9.5%. The entity
retains rights to Rs. 1,000 of any collections of principal plus interest thereon at 10%, plus the excess spread of 0.5% on
the remaining Rs. 9,000 of principal.
Collections are to be allocated between the entity and the transferee proportionately in the ratio of 1:9, but any defaults
are to be deducted from the entity’s interest of Rs. 1,000 until that interest is exhausted. The fair value of the loans at the
date of the transaction is Rs. 10,100 and the fair value of the excess spread of 0.5% is Rs. 40.
Required:
Explain the accounting treatment along with journal entry at the date of transfer.
Question 7
On January 1, 2019 Zee Limited (ZL) sold 2,000 debentures of a company at a price of Rs. 120 per debenture (equal to fair
value of debenture on that date) to Hexa Finance (HF) in a sale and repurchase agreement. Following terms were agreed
in repo agreement:
- ZL will purchase the debentures on December 31, 2020 at a price of Rs. 132 per debenture (irrespective of fair value)
- Coupon payments for 2019 and 2020 will be received by HF being legal owner of debentures
[It gives an effective rate of return of HF equal to 17.106%]
These debentures had been purchased on January 1, 2018 for Rs. 105 per debenture and ZL also incurred transaction
costs of Rs. 6,000. The effective rate was 12% whereas annual coupon payment was Rs. 15 per debenture.
Required:
Journal entries for the years ending December 31, 2019 and 2020.
Question 8
On December 1, 2019 Wee Limited (WL) sold its receivable to factors as follows:
- Receivables amounting to Rs. 800,000 were sold to Factor Aay and receives an advance of 70% immediately at an
interest of 1% per month. The factor also charged a fee of Rs. 8,000 for the service. Factor Aay will pay the balance
amount, after deducting interest and service fees, on debt settlement by customer (i.e. on December 31, 2019). The
debts are factored with recourse.
- Receivables amounting to Rs. 500,000 were sold to a Factor Bee for an immediate payment of Rs. 400,000 and
remaining Rs. 70,000 will be paid on December 31, 2019. The debts are factored without recourse.
Required:
Journal entries for above transactions assuming that debtors settled their accounts on December 31, 2019.
Question 9
Zalmi Limited (ZL) took a loan from Dolphin Bank amounting to Rs. 800,000 on January 1, 2017 at 10% interest payable
annually. Final maturity of loan is on December 31, 2021. ZL also paid processing and legal charges of Rs. 30,000. As a
result its effective interest rate was 11.015%.
During 2018, ZL faced certain financial difficulties and the bank agreed to modify the existing loan. On January 1, 2019,
new terms were agreed as follows:
o ZL will not pay interest for the years 2019 and 2020
o From 2021 onwards annual interest rate will be charged at 12% (i.e. market interest rate)
o Final maturity date will be extended to December 31, 2023
o Fair value of new loan on that date was Rs. 637,755 and effective interest rate was 12%.
ZL paid Rs. 25,000 on January 1, 2019 relating to modification of the loan contract.
Required:
Journal entries for the year ending December 31, 2019.
Question 10
Kings Limited (KL) took a loan from Sultan Bank amounting to Rs. 800,000 on January 1, 2017 at 10% interest payable
annually. Final maturity of loan is on December 31, 2021. ZL also paid processing and legal charges of Rs. 30,000. As a
result its effective interest rate was 11.015%.
During 2018, ZL faced certain financial difficulties and the bank agreed to modify the existing loan. On January 1, 2019,
new terms were agreed as follows:
o ZL will not pay interest for the years 2019 and 2020
o From 2021 onwards annual interest rate will be charged at 13% (i.e. market interest rate)
o Final maturity date will be extended to December 31, 2023
ZL paid Rs. 40,000 on January 1, 2019 relating to modification of the loan contract.
Required:
Journal entries for the year ending December 31, 2019.
Question 11
On January 1, 2017, Sidney Limited (SL) purchased 1 million 5 years debentures issued by Oval Limited (OL) at a premium
of Rs. 5 per debenture. SL also incurred transaction costs of Rs. 1.50 per debenture. Coupon rate was 6% payable annually.
The debentures would be redeemed at par value of Rs. 100 each on December 31, 2021. The effective interest rate was
4.5186%.
Due to certain financial and liquidity issues, OL re-structured the payment plan with effect from January 1, 2020 after due
consultation with debenture holders. Under the revised plan the maturity date was extended by one year. further the
coupon rate was increased to 6.25% for 2020 and 2021 and 6.50% for 2022.
Required:
Journal entries for the year ending December 31, 2020.
Question 12
On January 1, 2018, Mosco Limited (ML) issued 1 million debentures at par (i.e. Rs. 100 each) against purchase of a
building. Coupon rate was 12% per annum whereas effective interest was 14.5%.
On January 1, 2020 it was agreed with the creditor to settle the entire remaining liability by issue of ordinary shares of
ML (having face value of Rs. 10 each) and a result 1.8 million shares were issued. The market price of ML’s shares on
that date was Rs. 65 per share.
Required:
Journal entry to record the issue of shares.
SOLUTIONS
Solution No. 1
Dr. Cr.
------------ Rs. -----------
31-12-19 Investment (AC) 43,948
Interest income 43,948
[Investment income for 2019]
W-1
Opening Closing
Date Interest Payment
balance balance
[A] [B = A x 8.6687%] [C] [A + B - C]
31-12-17 500,000 43,344 40,000 503,344
31-12-18 503,344 43,633 40,000 506,977
31-12-19 506,977 43,948 40,000 510,925
W-2 Rs.
Gross carrying amount 510,925
Loss allowance (9,200)
501,725
Fair value 510,000
Fair value gain 8,275
Solution 2
Dr. Cr.
------------ Rs. -----------
31-12-19 Investment (FVPL) [590,000 - 545,000] 45,000
Fair value gain [P&L] 45,000
[Fair value gain for 2019]
Solution 3
Dr. Cr.
------------ Rs. -----------
31-12-19 Investment (FVOCI) (W-1) 14,215
Interest income 14,215
[Investment income for 2019]
W-1
Opening Closing Fair value
Date Interest Payment Fair value OCI
balance balance reserve
[A] [B = A x 10%] [C] [A + B - C] [E] [F = E - D] [Change in F]
31-12-18 147,408 14,741 20,000 142,149 145,350 3,201 3,201
31-12-19 142,149 14,215 20,000 136,364 148,850 12,486 9,285
31-12-20 136,364 13,636 20,000 130,000 - - -
Solution 4
Dr. Cr.
(a) ------------ Rs. -----------
30-04-20 Investment [3,000 x (68 – 62)] 18,000
Fair value gain [P&L] 18,000
[Remeasurement on the date of de-recognition]
Dr. Cr.
(b) ------------ Rs. -----------
30-04-20 Investment [3,000 x (68 – 62)] 18,000
Fair value reserve [OCI] 18,000
[Remeasurement on the date of de-recognition]
Solution 5
Dr. Cr.
(a) ------------ Rs. -----------
30-04-20 Investment (W-1) 8,294
Interest income 8,294
[Investment income for 4 months]
W-1
Opening Closing Fair value
Date Interest Payment Fair value OCI
balance balance reserve
[A] [B = A x 12%] [C] [A + B - C] [E] [F = E - D] [Change in F]
31-12-18 216,000 25,920 30,000 211,920 220,000 8,080 8,080
31-12-19 211,920 25,430 30,000 207,350 226,000 18,650 10,570
30-04-20 207,350 8,294 - 215,644 236,000 20,356 1,706
[207,350 x 12% x 4/12]
Solution 6
The entity calculates that Rs. 9,090 (90% × Rs. 10,100) of the consideration received of Rs. 9,115 represents the
consideration for a fully proportionate 90%. The remainder of the consideration received (Rs. 25) represents consideration
received for subordinating its retained interest to provide credit enhancement to the transferee for credit losses. In
addition, the excess spread of 0.5% represents consideration received for the credit enhancement. Accordingly, the total
consideration received for the credit enhancement is Rs. 65 (Rs. 25 + Rs. 40).
For allocation of carrying amount to portion of asset de-recognized and portion retained, it is assumed that fair values of
both portions also have a ratio of 1:9 as follows:
Allocation of carrying amount Fair value Portion Carrying amount
Rs. Rs.
Portion transferred 9,090 90% 9,000
Portion retained 1,010 10% 1,000
10,100 10,000
Dr. Cr.
-------- Rs. -------
01-01-20 Cash 9,115
Continuing involvement [1,000 + 40] 1,040
Liability [1,040 + 25] 1,065
Financial asset (W-1) 9,000
Profit on transfer (balancing) 90
[Recognition of transfer]
Solution 7
Dr. Cr.
------------ Rs. -----------
01-01-19 Cash [120 x 2,000] 240,000
Financial liability - repo 240,000
[sale of debentures]
W-1
Opening Closing
Date Interest Payment
balance balance
[A] [B = A x 12%] [C] [A + B - C]
31-12-18 216,000 25,920 30,000 211,920
31-12-19 211,920 25,430 30,000 207,350
31-12-20 207,350 24,882 30,000 202,232
Solution 8
Dr. Cr.
(a) Factor with recourse ------------ Rs. -----------
01-12-19 Cash [800,000 x 70%] 560,000
Financial liability (Factor) 560,000
[70% advance received]
Solution 9
Dr. Cr.
------------ Rs. -----------
01-01-19 Bank loan (existing) (W-1) 780,161
Gain on extinguishment 117,406
Cash 25,000
Bank loan (New) 637,755
[Restructuring of loan]
Solution 10
Dr. Cr.
------------ Rs. -----------
01-01-19 Bank loan (existing) (W-1) 40,000
Cash 40,000
[Restructuring cost of loan]
IRR = 9.0427%
Solution 11
Dr. Cr.
--------- Rs. million --------
01-01-20 Investment (W-2) 2.22
Modification gain [P&L] 2.22
[Modification gain recognized]
W-1
Opening Closing
Date Modification Interest Cashflow
balance balance
[A] [B] [C = (A + B) x 4.5186%] [D] [A + B + C - D]
Solution 12
Dr. Cr.
------------ Rs. million ----------
-
01-01-20 Debentures (W-1) 105.36
Loss on extinguishment 11.64
Share capital [1.8 x Rs. 10] 18.00
Share premium [1.8 x Rs. 55] 99.00
[Extinguishment of financial liability]
W-1
Opening Closing
Date Interest Payment
balance balance
[A] [B = A x 14.5%] [C] [A + B - C]
31-12-18 100.00 14.50 12.00 102.50
31-12-19 102.50 14.86 12.00 105.36
DEFINITIONS
A financial instrument is any contract that gives rise to a financial asset of one entity and a financial
liability or equity instrument of another entity.
An equity instrument is any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of an entity after
deducting all of its liabilities.
PRESENTATION
1. The issuer of the financial instrument shall classify the instrument (or its component parts) on initial
recognition as a financial liability or an equity instrument in accordance with the substance of the
contractual agreement and the definitions.
2. A critical feature in differentiating a financial liability from an equity instrument is the existence of a
contractual obligation of one party to the financial instrument (the issuer) either to deliver cash or
another financial asset to the other party (the holder) or to exchange financial assets or financial
liabilities with the holder under conditions that are potentially unfavourable to the issuer. Although
the holder of an equity instrument may be entitled to receive a pro rata share of any dividends or
other distributions of equity, the issuer does not have a contractual obligation to make such
distributions because it cannot be required to deliver cash or another financial asset to another party.
3. A contract is not an equity instrument solely because it may result in the receipt or delivery of the
entity’s own equity instruments. Two examples are (a) a contract to deliver as many of the entity’s
own equity instruments as are equal in value to Rs. 100, and (b) a contract to deliver as many of the
entity’s own equity instruments as are equal in value to the value of 100 ounces of gold. Such a
contract is a financial liability of the entity even though the entity must or can settle it by delivering
its own equity instruments.
4. A financial instrument may require the entity to deliver cash or another financial asset, or otherwise
to settle it in such a way that it would be a financial liability, in the event of the occurrence or
non-occurrence of uncertain future events (or on the outcome of uncertain circumstances) that are
beyond the control of both the issuer and the holder of the instrument, such as a change in a stock
market index, consumer price index, interest rate or taxation requirements, or the issuer’s future
revenues, net income or debt-to-equity ratio. The issuer of such an instrument does not have the
unconditional right to avoid delivering cash or another financial asset (or otherwise to settle it in such
a way that it would be a financial liability). Therefore, it is a financial liability of the issuer.
For example, a bond or similar instrument convertible by the holder into a fixed number of ordinary
shares of the entity is a compound financial instrument. From the perspective of the entity, such an
instrument comprises two components: a financial liability (a contractual arrangement to deliver cash
or another financial asset) and an equity instrument (a call option granting the holder the right, for a
specified period of time, to convert it into a fixed number of ordinary shares of the entity). The
economic effect of issuing such an instrument is substantially the same as issuing simultaneously a
debt instrument with an early settlement provision and warrants to purchase ordinary shares, or
issuing a debt instrument with detachable share purchase warrants. Accordingly, in all cases, the
entity presents the liability and equity components separately in its statement of financial position.
2. Classification of the liability and equity components of a convertible instrument is not revised as a
result of a change in the likelihood that a conversion option will be exercised, even when exercise of
the option may appear to have become economically advantageous to some holders.
3. The initial carrying amount of a compound financial instrument is allocated to its equity and liability
components as follows:
Fair value of the instrument as a whole X
Less: Financial liability component [i.e. calculated as PV of contractual cashflows (X)
(ignoring conversion option) discounted at the market rate of interest on similar
debt instruments without conversion options]
Equity component X
4. Transaction costs that relate to the issue of compound financial instrument are allocated to the
liability and equity components of the instrument in proportion to above allocation.
Transaction cost relating to:
7. When an entity extinguishes a convertible instrument before maturity through an early redemption
or repurchase in which the original conversion privileges are unchanged:
(a) the entity allocates the consideration paid for the repurchase or redemption to the liability and
equity components of the instrument at the date of the transaction and account for as follows:
(b) Any transaction cost paid is allocated to liability component and equity component in ratio of [A]
and [B] above mentioned in point [7(a)]. This allocated transaction cost is then accounted for as
follows:
(c) Any remaining balance in equity component may be transferred to another line item in equity e.g.
retained earnings.
8. An entity may amend the terms of a convertible instrument to induce early conversion, for example
by offering a more favourable conversion ratio or paying other additional consideration in the event
of conversion before a specified date. The difference, at the date the terms are amended, between
the fair value of the consideration the holder receives on conversion of the instrument under the
revised terms and the fair value of the consideration the holder would have received under the
original terms is recognised as a loss in profit or loss.
Treasury shares
If an entity reacquires its own equity instruments, those instruments (‘treasury shares’) shall be deducted
from equity. No gain or loss shall be recognized in profit or loss on the purchase, sale, issue or cancellation
of an entity’s own equity instruments. Such treasury shares may be acquired and held by the entity or by
other members of the consolidated group.
However, when an entity holds its own equity on behalf of others, e.g. a financial institution holding its
own equity on behalf of a client, there is an agency relationship and as a result those holdings are not
included in the entity’s statement of financial position.
Interest, dividends, losses and gains relating to a financial instrument or a component that is a financial
liability shall be recognized as income or expense in profit or loss. Distributions to holders of an equity
instrument shall be recognized by the entity directly in equity. Transaction costs of an equity transaction
shall be accounted for as a deduction from equity.
1. A financial asset and a financial liability shall be offset and the net amount presented in the statement
of financial position when, and only when, an entity:
(a) currently has a legally enforceable right to set off the recognized amounts; and
(b) intends either to settle on a net basis, or to realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.
2. An entity currently has a legally enforceable right of set‑off if the right of set‑off:
(a) is not contingent on a future event; and
(b) is legally enforceable in all of the following circumstances:
(i) the normal course of business;
(ii) the event of default; and
(iii) the event of insolvency or bankruptcy of the entity and all of the counterparties.
3. Offsetting a recognized financial asset and a recognized financial liability and presenting the net
amount differs from the derecognition of a financial asset or a financial liability. Although offsetting
does not give rise to recognition of a gain or loss, the derecognition of a financial instrument not only
results in the removal of the previously recognized item from the statement of financial position but
also may result in recognition of a gain or loss.
Preference shares
Preference shares may be issued with various rights. In determining whether a preference share is a
financial liability or an equity instrument, an issuer assesses the particular rights attaching to the share to
determine whether it exhibits the fundamental characteristic of a financial liability.
A summary of various terms relating to preference shares and the resulting accounting treatment is
outlined in the table below:
Preference shares Preference dividend Preference dividend
(Mandatory) (Discretionary)
Redeemable: It is considered as financial It is considered as compound
- Mandatory; OR liability instrument
- At the option of holder
Liability is initially measured at Liability is initially measured at
fair value i.e. present value of PV of the redemption amount
future contractual cashflows only.
Equity is initially measured as
residual.
PRACTICE QUESTIONS
Question 1
An entity issued 2,000 convertible bonds on January 1, 2020. The bonds have a three-year term, and are issued at par
with a face value of Rs. 1,000 per bond, giving total proceeds of Rs. 2,000,000 but the fair value was Rs. 1,980,000. Interest
is payable annually in arrears at a nominal annual interest rate of 6 per cent. Each bond is convertible at any time up to
maturity into 250 ordinary shares. When the bonds are issued, the prevailing market interest rate for similar debt without
conversion options is 9 per cent.
Required:
Journal entry at initial recognition of bonds.
Question 2
A Pakistani company issued 100 5% FCCBs at a nominal value of $ 5 each on January 1, 2019. These bonds can be redeemed
at par or converted into 25 ordinary shares per bond after 3 years. On the date of issuance, market rate of return for
similar bonds without conversion option was 9%. Exchange rates are as follows:
Date Rs./$
01-01-19 150
31-12-19 152
31-12-20 156
31-12-21 160
Required:
All journal entries till maturity if on maturity:
(a) Investor opts for cash redemption.
(b) Investor opts for conversion (Assume face value of each share is Rs. 10).
Question 3
An entity issued 1,000 convertible bonds on January 1, 2011. The bonds had a 10-year term, and were issued at par with
a face value of Rs. 1,000 per bond, giving total proceeds of Rs. 1,000,000. Interest is payable in arrears at a nominal annual
interest rate of 10% payable every 6-months. Each bond is convertible on maturity into ordinary shares at a conversion
price of Rs. 25 per share. When the bonds were issued, the prevailing market interest rate for similar debt without
conversion options was 11%.
On January 1, 2016 the entity repurchased the bonds at a price of Rs. 1,700 each. On that date market interest rate of
similar non-convertible bonds was 8%.
Required:
Journal entries to record repurchase of bonds.
Question 4
An entity issued 1,000 convertible bonds on January 1, 2011. The bonds had a 10-year term, and were issued at par with
a face value of Rs. 1,000 per bond, giving total proceeds of Rs. 1,000,000. Interest is payable in arrears at a nominal annual
interest rate of 10% payable every 6-months. Each bond is convertible on maturity into ordinary shares at a conversion
price of Rs. 25 per share. When the bonds were issued, the prevailing market interest rate for similar debt without
conversion options was 11%.
On January 1, 2012, to induce the holder to convert the convertible debenture, the entity reduced the conversion price
to Rs. 20. Assume the market price of entity’s ordinary shares on the date of amendment is Rs. 40 per share.
Required:
Journal entry on January 1, 2012 to record the effect of amendment.
Question 5
Following transactions relate to Aron Limited (AL):
(a) AL issued one million convertible bonds on January 1, 2018. The bonds had a term of three years and were issued
with a total fair value of Rs. 100 million which is also the par value. Interest is paid annually in arrears at a rate of 6%
per annum and bonds, without the conversion option, attracted an interest rate of 9% per annum on January 1, 2018.
The company incurred issue costs of Rs. 1 million. If the investor did not convert to shares they would have been
redeemed at par. At maturity all of the bonds were converted into 2.5 million ordinary shares of Rs. 10 each of AL.
No bonds could be converted before that date. The directors have been told that the impact of the issue costs is to
increase the effective interest rate to 9.38%.
(b) AL held a 3% holding of the shares in Smart, a public limited company, The investment was classified as an investment
in equity instruments and at December 31, 2020 had a carrying value of Rs. 5 million (brought forward from the
previous period). As permitted by IFRS 9 Financial instruments, AL had made an irrevocable election to recognize all
changes in fair value in other comprehensive income. The cumulative gain to December 31, 2019 recognized in other
comprehensive income relating to the investment was Rs. 400,000. On December 31, 2020, the whole of the share
capital of Smart was acquired by Given, a public limited company, and as a result, AL received shares in Given with a
fair value of Rs. 5.5 million in exchange for its holding in Smart.
(c) AL granted interest free loans to its employees on January 1, 2020 of Rs. 10 million. The loans will be paid back on
December 31, 2021 as a single payment by the employees. The market rate of interest for a two year loan on both of
the above dates is 6% per annum.
Required:
Journal entries for the year ending December 31, 2020.
SOLUTIONS
Solution No. 1 Dr. Cr.
------------ Rs. -----------
01-01-20 Cash 2,000,000
Gain on initial recognition [P&L] 20,000
Financial liability (W-1) 1,848,122
Equity component (W-1) 131,878
[Initial recognition of bonds]
W-1 Rs.
Total fair value of financial instrument 1,980,000
Liability component 1,848,122
[120,000 x annuity factor at 9% + 2,000,000 x discount factor at 9%]
Equity component 131,878
(a) Redemption
31-12-21 Financial liability [525(W-2) x 160] 84,000
Equity component 7,594
Retained earnings 7,594
Cash 84,000
[Redemption of bonds]
(b) Conversion
31-12-21 Financial liability [525(W-2) x 160] 84,000
Equity component 7,594
Share capital [100 x 25 x RS. 10] 25,000
Share premium (balancing) 66,594
[Conversion of bonds into ordinary shares]
W-1 $
Total fair value of financial instrument [$ 5 x 100] 500.00
Liability component [$500 x 5% x annuity factor at 9% + $500 x discount factor at 9%] 449.37
Equity component 50.63
W-2
------------------------ $ Amortized cost ------------------------- Rupees
amortized
Date Opening Closing
Interest Cashflow cost
balance balance (translated)
[A] [B = A x 9%] [C] [D = A + B - C] [E]
31-12-19 449.37 40.44 25.00 464.81 70,652 [464.81 x 152]
31-12-20 464.81 41.83 25.00 481.64 75,136 [481.64 x 153]
31-12-21 481.64 43.36 525.00 - -
W-1 Rs.
Initial measurement:
Total value of financial instrument 1,000,000
Liability component 940,248
[50,000 x annuity factor at 5.5%* + 1,000,000 x discount factor at 5.5%]
Equity component 59,752
* 11% x 6/12 = 5.5%
W-2
Loss on repurchase of liability:
PV of remaining contractual cashflows at 8% 1,081,109
[50,000 x annuity factor at 4% + 1,000,000 x discount factor at 4%]
Solution No. 4
Dr. Cr.
------------ Rs. -----------
01-01-12 Loss on amendment 400,000
Equity component (W-1) 400,000
[Loss on amendment of conversion ratio]
W-1 Rs.
Fair value of shares under amended terms [Rs. 1m ÷ Rs. 20 x Rs. 40] 2,000,000
Fair value of shares under original terms [Rs. 1m ÷ Rs. 25 x Rs. 40] 1,600,000
Loss on amendment 400,000
Solution No. 5
Dr. Cr.
------------ Rs. million ----------
(a) -
31-12-20 Interest expense (W-2) 9.11
Financial liability 9.11
[Interest expense for 2020]
(b)
31-12-20 Investment (Smart) [5.50 - 5] 0.50
FV reserve [OCI] 0.50
[Remeasurement gain on de-recognition]
(c)
01-01-20 Financial asset (Loan) [10m x 1.06-2] 8.90
Employee cost (balancing) 1.10
Cash 10.00
[Initial recognition of loan]
W-2
Opening Closing
Date Interest Payment
balance balance
[A] [B = A x 9.38%] [C] [A + B - C]
31-12-18 91.48 8.58 6.00 94.06
31-12-19 94.06 8.82 6.00 96.89
31-12-20 96.89 9.11 6.00 100.00
DERIVATIVES
A financial instrument or other contract with all three of the following characteristics:
(a) its value changes in response to the change in a specified interest rate, financial instrument price,
commodity price, foreign exchange rate, index of prices or rates, credit rating or credit index, or other
variable (called the ‘underlying’).
(b) it requires no initial net investment or an initial net investment that is smaller than would be required
for other types of contracts that would be expected to have a similar response to changes in market
factors.
(c) it is settled at a future date.
Examples:
Forward – a forward contract is a binding contract to buy or sell a specified amount of a specified item
(e.g. currency, oil, gold etc.) on a specified date. Normally a commission is paid at the time of contract.
Future – a future contract is a contract to buy or sell standard amount of a particular item (e.g. currency,
copper, shares etc.) on a standard date at a price determined in market. Futures are traded in an organized
market where these contracts are mostly settled by closing out by taking opposite position (e.g. sell now
and buy later) and net gain/loss is settled.
Option – an option contract is a right to its holder to buy or sell a particular item (e.g. shares, currency, oil
etc.) at a specified price on a specified date. Holder is not obligated to exercise the option rather it may
exercise the option only when beneficial. A premium (i.e. charges for option) is paid at the time of contract
irrespective of whether the option is eventually exercised or not.
Swap – a swap is an agreement between parties to exchange a series of cashflow at an agreed rate. Most
commonly used type of swap arrangement is an interest rate swap where two parties agree to exchange
interest payments calculated on a notional principal. Sometimes a fee is also paid to a bank that arranges
the swap and the said fee is also generally agreed as a % of notional principal.
Use of derivatives:
- Speculation
- Hedging
Measurement:
If used for speculation, derivates are termed as “held for trading” and measured at fair value through P&L.
Embedded derivatives
An embedded derivative is a component of a hybrid contract that also includes non-derivative host—
with the effect that some of the cash flows of the combined instrument vary in a way similar to a
stand-alone derivative. An embedded derivative causes some or all of the cash flows that otherwise
would be required by the contract to be modified according to a specified interest rate, financial
instrument price, commodity price, foreign exchange rate, index of prices or rates, credit rating or credit
index, or other variable, provided in the case of a non-financial variable that the variable is not specific
to a party to the contract.
If the host contract is not a financial asset as per IFRS 9, then an embedded derivative shall be separated
from the host and accounted for as a derivative (i.e. measured at fair value through P&L) [e.g. purchase
of convertible debenture].
However, if the host contract is a financial asset as per IFRS 9, then whole contract is accounted for as
per IFRS 9 and derivative is not separated. [e.g. purchase of a car with share warrant]
HEDGING
Hedging refers to an entity’s risk management activities that use financial instruments to manage
exposures arising from particular risks that could affect profit or loss or OCI.
Hedged item
A hedged item is a recognized asset or liability, an unrecognized firm commitment (e.g. purchase order),
highly probable forecast transaction or net investment in a foreign operation that (a) exposes the entity
to risk of changes in fair value or future cash flows and (b) is designated as being hedged.
Hedging instrument
A hedging instrument is a designated derivative or (for a hedge of the risk of changes in foreign currency
exchange rates only a designated non-derivative financial asset or non-derivative financial liability) whose
fair value or cash flows are expected to offset changes in the fair value or cash flows of a designated
hedged item.
Hedge effectiveness
Hedge effectiveness is the degree to which changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item that
are attributable to a hedged risk are offset by changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedging
instrument.
Hedge ratio
Hedge ratio is the relationship between the quantity of the hedging instrument and the quantity of the
hedged item in terms of their relative weighting.
HEDGING ACCOUNTING
A hedging relationship qualifies for hedge accounting only if all of the following criteria are met:
(a) the hedging relationship consists only of eligible hedging instruments and eligible hedged items.
(b) at the inception of the hedging relationship there is formal designation and documentation of the
hedging relationship and the entity’s risk management objective and strategy for undertaking the
hedge. That documentation shall include identification of the hedging instrument, the hedged item,
the nature of the risk being hedged and how the entity will assess whether the hedging relationship
meets the hedge effectiveness requirements (including its analysis of the sources of hedge
ineffectiveness and how it determines the hedge ratio).
(c) the hedging relationship meets all of the following hedge effectiveness requirements:
(i) there is an economic relationship between the hedged item and the hedging instrument (i.e. the
hedging instrument and the hedged item have values that generally move in the opposite
direction because of the same risk, which is the hedged risk).
(ii) the effect of credit risk does not dominate the value changes that result from that economic
relationship (i.e. the gain or loss from credit risk does not frustrate the effect of changes in the
underlying on the value of the hedged item or hedging instrument); and
(iii) the hedge ratio of the hedging relationship is the same as that resulting from the quantity of the
hedged item that the entity actually hedges and the quantity of the hedging instrument that the
entity actually uses to hedge that quantity of hedged item.
An entity shall discontinue hedge accounting prospectively only when the hedging relationship (or a part
of a hedging relationship) ceases to meet the qualifying criteria. This includes instances when the hedging
instrument expires or is sold, terminated or exercised.
There are three types of hedging relationships:
1) fair value hedge
2) cash flow hedge
3) hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation (IAS 21)
Exam tips for selecting between fair value hedge and cashflow hedge:
Examples of items Hedge
Fixed rate debt (asset/liability) Fair value hedge
Floating rate debt (asset/liability) Cashflow hedge
Highly probable forecast transaction Cashflow hedge
Foreign currency firm commitment Entity has choice of either of the two hedges
Foreign currency receivables/payables Cashflow hedge
Recognized assets whose value changes are a Fair value hedge
concern for entity (e.g. inventory, investment in
shares)
However, exam question may specify any hedge to be used different from above tips.
(b) the hedging gain or loss on the hedged item shall adjust the carrying amount of the hedged item. If
the measurement of hedged item involves amortized calculation, then this adjustment in carrying
amount is taken to P&L [as mentioned in (a) above] through revised effective interest rate.
When a hedged item is an unrecognized firm commitment, the cumulative change in the fair value of
the hedged item subsequent to its designation is recognized as a firm commitment asset or a firm
commitment liability. If this commitment was to acquire an asset or assume a liability, then such firm
commitment asset or firm commitment liability shall be closed against initial carrying amount of the
asset or liability on eventual recognition.
The cumulative gain or loss that has been accumulated in foreign currency translation reserve shall be
reclassified from equity to P&L as a reclassification adjustment on the disposal of the foreign operation.
PRACTICE QUESTIONS
Question 1
Journalize each of the following independent derivative transactions, entered into for speculation purposes:
(a) On May 1, 2020 A limited entered into a forward contract with Bank XYZ to purchase $ 50,000 on July 31, 2020 at an
agreed rate of Rs/$ 160. A forward commission of Rs. 0.1 per USD was paid at the time of contract. Following exchange
rates are available:
Date Forward rate (Rs/$) Spot rate (Rs/$)
01-05-20 160 (3-month forward) 158.20
30-06-20 (year-end) 162.25 (1 month forward) 161.30
31-07-20 - 163.50
(b) On June 1, 2020 B limited purchased 2000 call options on shares of ML, a listed company, on following terms:
Exercise price Rs. 45 per share
Exercise date August 31, 2020
Premium Rs. 2 per share (it is also considered as fair value of option on that date)
(c) On June 1, 2020 C limited bought 12 crude oil future contracts, with a contract size of 150 barrels, having 30 th
September maturity. Following are the future prices quoted in future market for 30th September crude oil futures:
Date Future price
(Rs/barrel)
01-06-20 10,000
30-06-20 (year-end) 9,800
30-09-20 9,450
(d) Company A has a loan of Rs. 2 million with a fixed rate of 10%. Company B has a loan of Rs. 2 million with a variable
rate of KIBOR which is revised annually. On January 1, 2019 both companies agreed to swap their interest rates for
three years. KIBOR was revised as follows:
Date KIBOR
01-01-19 10%
01-01-20 8%
01-01-21 13%
Journalize all transactions in books of Company A for three years.
Question 2
On December 1, 2019 A limited acquired 10,000 ounces of a Material XYZ, at a cost of Rs. 220 per ounce, which it held in
its inventories. A limited was concerned that the price of XYZ would fall, so on December 1, 2019 it sold 10,000 ounces in
future market at a price of Rs. 215 per ounce with a maturity date of March 31, 2020.
At December 31, 2019 (i.e. accounting year-end) the fair value of XYZ was Rs. 200 per ounce while the future price moved
to Rs. 198 per ounce. On March 1, 2020 A limited sold entire stock of XYZ at market price of Rs. 195 per ounce whereas
future price of 31st March XYZ future at date was Rs. 192.
Required:
All journal entries for above transactions.
Question 3
B limited has a firm commitment to buy a machine for $ 2 million on March 31, 2020. The directors are worried about
exchange rate fluctuations. On October 1, 2019, when exchange rate was Rs/$ 150, B limited entered into a future contract
to buy $ 2 million with a maturity date of March 31, 2020 at a price of Rs. 152 per $.
At December 31, 2019 (i.e. accounting year-end) spot exchange rate moved to Rs/$ 154.50. On that date future price of
31st March $ future moved to Rs. 157 per $. Finally on 31st March 2020 spot exchange rate moved to Rs./$ 160. Useful life
of machine is 10 years.
Required:
Journal entries in respect of above information for the years ending December 31, 2019 and 2020 if on October 1, 2019
the future contract was designated as a fair value hedge for the firm commitment of purchase of machine.
Question 4
OneAir is a successful international airline. A key factor affecting OneAir’s cashflows and profits is the price of jet fuel. On
October 1, 2019, OneAir entered into a forward contract to hedge its expected fuel requirements for the second quarter
of 2020 for delivery of 28m gallons of jet fuel on March 31, 2020 at a price of Rs. 204 per gallon. The spot price on October
1, 2029 of jet fuel was Rs. 190 per gallon.
The airline intended to settle the contract net in cash and purchase the actual required quantity of jet fuel in the open
market on March 31, 2020.
At the company’s year end (i.e. December 31, 2019) the forward price for delivery on March 31, 2020 had risen to Rs. 216
per gallon of
ereas spot price on that day was Rs. 200 per gallon.
All necessary documentation was set up at inception for the contract to be accounted for as a hedge. On March 31, 2020
the company settled the forward contract net in cash and purchased 30m gallons of jet fuel at the spot price on that day
of Rs. 219 per gallon.
Required:
Journal entries for above transactions.
Question 5
Beta limited has approved a capital budget in its board meeting on October 1, 2019 to purchase a machine on September
30, 2020 from Ceta limited for £8 million. Beta limited hedged this highly probable forecast transaction by entering into a
forward contract to buy £8 million at an agreed rate of Rs/£ 200. Spot and forward exchange rates were as follows:
On September 30, 2020 the machine was purchased as per plan and accordingly brought into use. Its useful life was
estimated at 10 years.
Required:
Journal entries for the years ending December 31, 2019 and 2020.
Question 6
Delta Limited (DL) planned to purchase an asset in July 2021. In this respect a quotation was received from a supplier in
US for $ 50,000. A forward contract was taken out to hedge currency fluctuation on March 1, 2021 with an expiry date of
August 31, 2021. On April 15, 2021 it accepted the quotation and issued purchase order for the asset to be delivered on
July 20, 2021. Full purchase amount to be settled on August 31, 2021.
40% of this asset was sold on September 27, 2021 and 60% was sold on October 31, 2021.
Required:
All relevant journal entries assuming that:
(a) Purchased asset was inventory.
(b) Purchased asset was an Investment.
SOLUTIONS
Solution No. 1
Dr. Cr.
(a) ------------ Rs. -----------
01-05-20 P&L [0.1 x $ 50,000] 5,000
Cash 5,000
[Transaction cost paid]
(b)
01-06-20 Financial asset [2 x 2000] 4,000
Cash 4,000
[Initial recognition of option contract]
(c)
01-06-20 No entry
W-1
30-06-20 Rs.
Buy 10,000
Sell 9,800
Loss (200)
Total loss [200 x 150 x 12] (360,000)
30-09-20 Rs.
Buy 10,000
Sell 9,450
Loss (550)
Total loss [550 x 150 x 12] (990,000)
Total loss previously recognized (360,000)
(630,000)
(d)
31-12-19 Finance cost [2m x 10%] 200,000
Bank 200,000
[Interest on loan for 2019]
W-1
2020 %
A receives from B 10%
A pays to B 8%
Net receipt 2%
2021 %
A receives from B 10%
A pays to B 13%
Net payment -3%
Solution No. 2
Dr. Cr.
------------ Rs. -----------
01-12-19 Inventory [10,000 x 220] 2,200,000
Cash 2,200,000
[Purchase of 10,000 ounces of XYZ]
W-1
31-12-19 Rs.
Sell 215
Buy 198
Gain 17
Total gain [17 x 10,000] 170,000
01-03-20 Rs.
Sell 215
Buy 192
Gain 23
Total gain [23 x 10,000] 230,000
Total gain previously recognized 170,000
60,000
Solution No. 3
Dr. Cr.
------------ Rs. -----------
01-10-19 No entry
W-1
31-12-19 Rs.
Buy 152
Sell 157
Gain 5
31-03-20 Rs.
Buy 152
Sell 160
Gain 8
Solution No. 4
Dr. Cr.
------------ Rs. million --------
01-10-19 No entry
W-1
31-12-19 Rs. million
Cumulative loss on hedged item [(200 - 190) x 28m] (280.00)
Cumulative gain on hedging instrument [(216 - 204) x 28m] 336.00
Cash flow hedge reserve [i.e. lower of above] 280.00
Solution No. 5
Dr. Cr.
------------ Rs. million --------
01-10-19 No entry
W-1
31-12-19 Rs. million
Cumulative loss on hedged item [(190 - 180) x £8m] (80.00)
Cumulative gain on hedging instrument [(214 - 200) x £8m] 112.00
Cash flow hedge reserve [i.e. lower of above] 80.00
W-2
30-09-20 Rs. million
Cumulative loss on hedged item [(222 - 180) x £8m] (336.00)
Cumulative gain on hedging instrument [(222 - 200) x £8m] 176.00
Cash flow hedge reserve [i.e. lower of above] 176.00
W-1
15-04-21 Rs. 000
Cumulative loss on hedged item [(153 - 150) x $50,000] (150.00)
Cumulative gain on hedging instrument [(160 - 158) x $50,000] 100.00
Cash flow hedge reserve [i.e. lower of above] 100.00
W-2
30-06-21 Rs. 000
Initial recognition in firm commitment 100.00
Revised value of commitment [(158 - 150) x $50,000] 400.00
Forex loss 300.00