GROUP ASSIGNMENTS
GROUP 7 (Members)
1. Alicia Felician Felix
2. Wasatu Ngibombi Burito
3. Theresia L. Kimario
4. Zulfa Idrisa Msasa
5. Princess I. Mhavile
6. Norbert F. Kafyulilo
7. Elizabeth F. Vales
8. John P. Ndangali
9. Ridhiwani Rajabu
10. Nyanjobe Benjamin
11. Bahati R. Shirima
12. Neema Elias John
13. Brighton J. Mwakipesile
14. Erick L. Emmanel (Chair)
15. Kerene Edward Masanja
QUESTION: In not less than 15 pages critically analyze the journal-article by Eventius
Mugyabuso., “Protection of Legal Service Consumers in Tanzania: An examination of the law”,
LST Law Review, 2(2), 2017, p 28-46. In doing so discuss the strength and weakness of the work
and what gap would you have bridged.
GROUP 8 (Members)
1. Joeli H. Kanyika
2. Deltha Felician
3. Fatina Nizar (chair)
4. Devotha Masebele
5. Richard A. Mokily
6. Nora Mshinga
7. Edwin Alphonce
8. Ivon Gerald
9. Ally Athuman Mbaga
10. Seleman Z. Mgoi
11. John Osawa
12. Erick Lukindo
13. Stephen p. Lema
14. Mecedese D. Manyaro
15. Justine Morice
QUESTION: In not less than 15 pages critically analyze the journal-article by Jingwei Xu,
Zhengmin Li and Siyu Li., “Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility in the Legal
Profession”, SHS Web of Conference, 190, 02006, 2024, p 1-4. In doing so discuss the strength
and weakness of the work and what gap would you have bridged.
GROUP 9 (Members)
1. Emmanuel David Kabetile
2. Samwel R. Masabile
3. Magreth E. Sanga
4. Sefroni Ndimbo
5. Elizabeth W. Revocatus (chair)
6. Rebecca E. Tille
7. Fransisca M. Kinyaga
8. Martha B. Sigala
9. Aggrey Jossam
10. Junior James Utonga
11. Petro R. Lufiko
12. Benson o. Samson
13. Emmanuel Jacob
14. Yusuph Omary Kondo
15. Peter M. John
16. Evince J. Ngongela
17. Juma Mohende
QUESTION: With a proper title, in not less than 20 pages conduct a case review on the case of
Ado Shaibu v. Honorable John Pombe Magufuli (president of the United Republic of Tanzania)
&Others, Misc. Civil Cause 29 of 2018) [2019] TZHC at Dar es Salaam.
GROUP 10 (Members)
1. Joseph A. Masolwa
2. Ghati E. Werema
3. Said Hassan Bona
4. David Webster Magoti
5. Daudi M. Sulle
6. Mustapha Omary Kayage
7. Jane Kelvin Millinga
8. Hassan M. Mkwama
9. Luch M. Richard (chair)
10. Yona Emmanuel Nandi
11. Adela Mgoli
12. Belinda Thadey Lekole
13. Hellen M. Nyangoi
14. Magnus M. Ngomela
15. Benhadard E. Nnko
QUESTION: Construct a workable title with a specific focus on Touting and prepare a 15-
20 pages proposal bearing an introduction, background to the problem, statement of the
problem, literature review, significance of the study, objectives, hypothesis, methodology,
data analysis scope, and limitations.
INSTRUCTIONS
1. SUBMISSION DATE: 20TH JANUARY, 2025 (11:30AM)
2. WORK SHOULD BE PROPERLY CITED FOLLOWING THE UNIVERSITY
GUIDELINE ON CITING AND REFERENCING STYLE.
3. PLAGIARISM OF ANY SORT IS HIGHLY DISCOURAGED.
4. ANY USAGE OF ARIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) IS DISCOURAGED
5. SOFTCOPIES OF THE WORK SHOULD BE SENT TO
[email protected] not later than 03:00pm for plagiarism and AI checkup
GROUPU 11 (MEMBERS)
1. Shadrack Maugo (CHAIR)
2. Ramadhan Njole
3. Clesensia Thomas Kalonga
4. Christian M. Levira
5. Yusuph Hamadi Ramdhani
6. Costantine Peter
7. Joseph D. Mrope
8. Hopeman R. Kwuli
9. Godfather Jairo
10. Baraka Rofti Panja
11. Mohamed A. Singana
12. Mansuri Daddy Issa
13. Patricia Severineous Mwinula
14. Kerene Edward Masanja
15. Davis Duncan
16. Tatu Hassani Mussa
Question: In not less than 15 pages critically analyze the journal-article by Nickson Filbert
Kabinda., “An Analysis of Judicial Trends in Disciplining Unqualified Legal Practice in
Tanzania”, EALR, 48(2), 2021, p 159- 178. In doing so discuss the strength and weakness of the
author’s work and what gap would you have bridged.
GROUP 12 (MEMBERS)
1. Paschal C. Mponzi
2. Emmanuel R. Mtenga
3. Yohana Malogo
4. Linus Godwin Lebba
5. Filbert F. Tomo
6. Prosper Mwigeta
7. Geat A. Mwaiswelo (CHAIR)
8. Isack D. Ng’hola
9. Hamza M. Mwintumbwi
10. Danlody Mpangala
11. Remigius S. Haule
12. Abdullah I. Abdallah
13. Robert N. Marco
14. John Osawa
15. Esther C. Sebastian
16. Sikista Mapunda
QUESTION: In not less than 15 pages discuss the effectiveness and efficacy of the legal
framework in Tanzania in protecting the integrity of the legal profession: A lesson to learn from
South Africa.
INSTRUCTIONS
17. SUBMISSION DATE: 23rd JANUARY, 2025 (09:30AM)
18. WORK SHOULD BE PROPERLY CITED FOLLOWING THE UNIVERSITY
GUIDELINE ON CITING AND REFERENCING STYLE.
19. PLAGIARISM OF ANY SORT IS HIGHLY DISCOURAGED.
20. ANY USAGE OF ARIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) IS DISCOURAGED
GROUP 13 (MEMBERS)
1. Jesca J. Majengo
2. Isaya J. Sudayi
3. Anita Kyando
4. Jackline J. Masenga (chair)
5. David Magoti
6. Othman I. Ally
7. Paul Castory
8. Roberto G. Chodogo
9. Jovin D. Mtanila
10. Pili Samwel
11. Joshua N. Matiko
12. Faidha Malibiche
13. John Z. Haule
14. Monica J. Lubeleje
15. Catherine Wami
16. Nelson Chipeta
17. Anthony Ngeleza
QUESTION
Construct a workable title with a specific focus on Doc Brief and prepare a 15-20 pages proposal
bearing an introduction, background to the problem, statement of the problem, literature review,
significance of the study, objectives, hypothesis, methodology, data analysis scope, and
limitations.
GROUP 14 (Members)
1. John Charles (Chair)
2. Leticia Sitta
3. Jackson Mousa
4. Seif Yusuph Hassan
5. Daines Abel
6. Collin Mashiba
7. Norrine Vincent
8. Doreen P. Lymo
9. Roda B. Rwamtoga
10. Jackline Wanga Robert
11. Edson Salile Kiwele
12. Charity Abdallah Majengo
13. Aisha S. Ally
14. Eva Edward
15. Godfather Jairo
16. Silva Magembe Edward
17. Rahim Seif
QUESTION
Construct a workable title with a specific focus on Cab Rank Rule and prepare a 15-20 pages
proposal bearing an introduction, background to the problem, statement of the problem, literature
review, significance of the study, objectives, hypothesis, methodology, data analysis scope, and
limitations.
GROUP 15 (Members)
1. Melian Mweyo
2. Barke S. Zein
3. Davis Duncan
4. Husna Bakari Ndambwambo
5. Mahid A. Rahmani (CHAIR)
6. Goodlack Joshua Mange
7. Rahid Swaibu Abbubakari
8. Agnes Juma Mlenda
9. Jesca Robert Thobias
10. Bright G. Kaizilege
11. Lydia John
12. Tatu Hassan
13. Zarua R. Mkwele
14. Maria S. Tlanka
15. Daniel B. Mtui
16. Lusaka Mwang’onda
17. Maria P. Herman
QUESTION: 01st January, 2025: Adv. Omary while representing his client in an appeal
case at the Court of Appeal of Tanzania at Iringa, before a full bench panel of Justices of
Appeal chaired by Hon. Dr. Mkuki J.A. Lost a his civil appeal on preliminary objection.
He got so angered since that before the appeal got dismissed the chairman of the panel
blasted him in a way to discredit his competence and abilities in dealing with important
legal matters and interpretation of the black letters of the law. When asked to address the
court on the merit of the matter at hand, he told the chairman of the panel that “this so
called P.O. you entertained today had no legs fit to stand before this court. I am
surprised you dismiss this appeal on a baseless preliminary objection, leading to a huge
miscarriage of justice. If not for being corrupt then I don’t know what purpose you serve,
the judicial system in this miserable country is so corrupt. Since we know how things
operate in our judicial system, we will wait for that piece of judgment of which I know it
will be horrible then we will knock the doors of the East African Court of Justice, for
them to see how incompetent members of the bench in this country are.”
Hon. Dr. Mkuki J.A got so angered by the words uttered by the learned advocate, he
viewed them as a misconduct warranting punishment from him. He suspended adv.
Omary from practicing Law in Tanzania mainland for 2 years. In two days the file was
sent to the High Court of Iringa for reference of the punishment, to which the High Court
agreed and upheld the punishment to Adv. Omary.
REQUIRED
(a) Discuss the misconduct (s) conducted by Adv. Omary, if any.
(b) In not less than 5 pages provide a reasoned legal opinion to Adv. Omary on the
appropriateness of the matter at hand
(c) Discuss on the proper remedy, if any available to Adv. Omary against the punishment
upon him.
(d) Draft necessary document (s) to initiate the remedy advised under part (c).
GROUP 16 (Members)
1. Justine Albetus
2. John O. Raphael (Chair)
3. Catherine Wami
4. Benedict D. Maganga
5. Cris Francis Mfubusa
6. Ernest Msenga
7. Anifa R. Juma
8. Issa B. Kiyeyeli
9. Christowella Deniis
10. Yemima Nzowa
11. Cecelia Paul Mbetwa
12. Glory J. Urassa
13. Prosper Mugeta
14. Leila Shabani Amiry
15. Pendo Jossan Makondo
16. Monica Jacob
QUESTION
With a proper title, in not less than 20 pages conduct a case review on the case of Fatma Amani
Karume V. The Attorney General & The Jaji Kiongozi, High Court of Tanzania &Others Civil
Application No. 434/01 of 2019, CAT at Dar es Salaam (unreported).
GROUP 17 (Members)
1. Esther E. Mkinda
2. Neema P. Njale
3. Devotha Sweetbert
4. Amini Mwampashi
5. Grayson J. Mshana
6. Magreth Mwakaponda
7. Winchislaus A. Joshiser (Chair)
8. Neema Paul
9. Abas Hamadi
10. Rachel Yusto Ndekule
11. Jeckonia Mwaisumo
12. Agripina Andrea Marco
13. Emmanuel G. Konga
14. Anatul P. Gabriel
15. Tutindaga J. Mwakajila
16. Siwajali Masoud
17. Rosemary Mwanuke
QUESTION
08th November, 2024: Adv. Mkimbo while representing his client in a civil case at the
Resident Magistrate Court of Iringa at Iringa, before learned Dr. Makame (with
extended jurisdiction) lost a case on preliminary objection. He got so angered since that
before the case got dismissed the learned magistrate blasted him in a way to discredit his
competence and abilities in dealing with important legal matters and interpretation of the
black letters of the law. When asked to address the court on the merit of the matter at
hand, he told the learned magistrate that “this so called P.O. you entertained today had
no legs fit to stand before this court. I am surprised you dismiss this appeal on a baseless
preliminary objection, leading to a huge miscarriage of justice. If not for being corrupt
then I don’t know what purpose you serve, the judicial system in this miserable country is
so corrupt. Since we know how things operate in our judicial system, we will wait for that
piece of judgment of which I know it will be horrible then we will knock the doors of the
Court of Appeal of Tanzania and litigate before proper and competent members of the
bench.”
Learned magistrate Dr. Makame got so angered by the words uttered by the learned
advocate, he viewed them as a misconduct warranting punishment from him. He
suspended adv. Mkimbo from practicing Law in Tanzania mainland for 2 years. In two
days the file was sent to the High Court of Iringa for reference of the punishment, to
which the High Court agreed and upheld the punishment to Adv. Mkimbo.
REQUIRED
(a) Discuss the misconduct (s) conducted by Adv. Mkimbo, if any.
(b) In not less than 5 pages provide a reasoned legal opinion to Adv. Mkimbo on the
appropriateness of the matter at hand
(c) Discuss on the proper remedy, if any available to Adv. Mkimbo against the
punishment upon him.
(d) Draft necessary document (s) to initiate the remedy advised under part (c).
Group 18 (Members)
1. Natalis Lameck
2. Shabani Saidi Z
3. Jofrey O. Outa
4. Azalia D. Ngaki
5. Bahati B. Wilson (Chair)
6. France George
7. Marco E. Simaye
8. Emmakulata Kisanga
9. Maria M. Kizima
10. Michael G. Mhagama
11. Ester Makwaya
12. Jackline Dawarl
13. Dotto Edward
14. Bukamu M. Mataluma
15. Benedicto John Msangu
16. Hamida Ahmad Madodi
17. Sophia Hamza
QUESTION
08th November, 2024: Kimbuta Michael (S.A) who is employed at the office of Attorney
General was representing his client the defendant in a civil case between Paul Makoti v.
Jessica Kamau, Civil case no. 11 of 2024 at the High Court of Tanzania at Iringa, before
learned Hon. Kabang, J. lost a case on merits after full hearing. He got so angered since
that before the case got dismissed the learned magistrate blasted him in a way to discredit
his competence and abilities in dealing with important legal matters and interpretation of
the black letters of the law. When asked to address the court on the merit of the matter at
hand, he told the learned magistrate that “the whole process leading to this judgment was
so absurd and shambolic if clearly view between the lines. I am surprised that with all
the evidence tendered before this court by my client, this is a huge miscarriage of justice.
If not for being corrupt then I don’t know what purpose this court serve, the judicial
system in this miserable country is so poor and irritating. Since we know how things
operate in our judicial system, we will wait for that for that so called judgment of which I
know it will be so poor and easy to challenge, then we will knock the doors of the Court
of Appeal of Tanzania and litigate before proper and competent members of the bench.”
Learned Kbanga, J got so angered by the words uttered by the learned advocate, he
viewed them as a misconduct warranting punishment from him. He suspended learned
Kimbuta Michael from practicing Law in Tanzania mainland for 2 years. In two days the
file was sent to the High Court of Iringa for reference of the punishment, to which the
High Court agreed and upheld the punishment to Kimbuta Michael.
REQUIRED
(a) Discuss the misconduct (s) conducted by Kimbuta Michael, if any.
(b) In not less than 5 pages provide a reasoned legal opinion to kimbuta (S.A) on the
appropriateness of the matter at hand
(c) Discuss on the proper remedy, if any available to Kimbuta (S.A) against the
punishment upon him.
(d) Draft necessary document (s) to initiate the remedy advised under part (c).
(e) Suppose Hon. Kabanga, J before suspending Kimbuta (S.A) came to you for a legal
advice, in not less than three pages provide a detailed opinion on a proper action to be
taken by him.
Group 19 (MEMBERS)
1. Rabison A. Mahenge
2. Tumaini J. Kisoma
3. Magreth Mhagama
4. Irene M. Kiwelu
5. Aratumsila Sanga
6. Jamila Said
7. Asha Hussein Fungameza
8. Isaya Jonas M.
9. Faidha Malibeche
10. Shukuru H. Rashidi
11. Zainabu O. Barobegwa
12. Clesensia Thomas
13. Aisha Abdallah Bakari
14. Alice Emmanuel Nkalang’ango
15. Emmanuel Kabwebwe
16. Good R. Mkoko
17. Ahazi Chawala
18. Beatrice M. Mwakalime
QUESTION
15th October, 2024: Mrs. Jombo managed to visit LLBIII Advocates & Legal Consultants
Co. LTD where he met Adv. Mwinyimkuu for legal consultancy, after a long talk Adv.
Mwinyimkuu who is amongst the managing partner at the firm told Mrs. Jombo that “I
am sorry mum, but this is a very established and respected law firm where we only
represent high profile members of our society, regardless you are willing to pay our fees
but working with you will take the name of this respected firm to the mad. So I am truly
sorry but you will have to look for another firm somewhere else”. At a huge point this
frustrated Mrs. Jombo as she was told that LLBIII Advocates & Legal Consultants Co.
LTD is the best firm in town where justice is linked to all with high integrity.
23rd October, 2024 Adv. Mwinyimkuu appeared before the District Land and Housing
Tribunal at Mbeya representing his client the respondent in a case between Mwajuma
Nyaugoko V. Anna Siingiliki Land Case No.645 of 2024 before Ally Mandy (CP).
Shortly before hearing Adv. Mwinyimkuu sought that there is a need for him to file an
application for injunction against Ms. Nyaugoko, so, he prayed for a three days
adjournment so that he can file his application. In two days he filed an application before
the DLHT, and short after he received a call from the chairman to meet him at Alexandria
Hotel for lunch, he honored the meeting but to his dismay the chairperson Mr. Ally
Mandy told him that “I saw your well drafted application for temporary injunction, which
shows how good you are in drafting and legal reasoning, but normally injunctions are not
given freely of which according the caliber and reputation of your firm you will have to
pay TZS 1,000,000/= for it to be granted or kiss your application goodbye”
26h July, 2024: the learned Chair Person Ally Mandy was spotted at Miami Bar & Grill
drinking and hugging with Mwaijuma Nyaugoko. After a thorough research Adv.
Mwinyimkuu found out that Ally Mandy and Mwaijuma Nyaugoko are longtime lovers
since their time at University, regardless now Mr. Ally Mandy is married to someone else
with kids.
REQUIRED
(a) With the aid of legal authorities and case laws discuss the misconduct (s) conducted
by Adv. Mwinyimkuu, if any.
(b) With the aid of legal authorities discuss the misconduct (s) conducted by Mr. Ally
Mandy (CP), if any.
(c) What will be the proper disciplinary authority for Mr. Ally Mandy for the
misconducts identified under part (b)?
(d) Suppose Mr. Ally Mandy is aggrieved by the decision of the disciplinary author under
part (c) in not more than 3 pages advise him on the on the proper remedy, if any and
where.
(e) Draft necessary document (s) to initiate the remedy advised under part (d).
INSTRUCTIONS
19. SUBMISSION DATE: 30TH JANUARY, 2025 (12:10PM)
20. WORK SHOULD BE PROPERLY CITED FOLLOWING THE UNIVERSITY
GUIDELINE ON CITING AND REFERENCING STYLE.
21. PLAGIARISM OF ANY SORT IS HIGHLY DISCOURAGED.
22. ANY USAGE OF ARIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) IS DISCOURAGED
23. SOFTCOPIES OF THE WORK SHOULD BE SENT TO
[email protected] not later than 03:00pm for plagiarism and AI checkup
