A Strategic Analysis of Svelte and SolidJS for Long-Term

Application Development (2025-2030)

Executive Summary

This report provides an exhaustive technical and strategic comparison of the Svelte
and SolidJS frameworks to inform the selection of a technology stack for a new,
high-performance, secure, and scalable application slated for launch in 2025, with a
planned maintenance and development lifecycle of at least five years. The analysis
synthesizes performance benchmarks, architectural deep-dives, ecosystem maturity
assessments, and long-term viability forecasts to deliver a decisive, data-driven
recommendation.

The core finding is that both Svelte and SolidJS represent the pinnacle of modern web
framework architecture, having moved beyond the performance bottlenecks of the
Virtual DOM (VDOM) by leveraging compilers and fine-grained reactivity. Their
performance characteristics are now so closely matched that they both occupy the
highest tier of speed and efficiency, making raw performance a negligible factor in the
decision-making process for most applications.1

The fundamental distinction between the two frameworks lies in their philosophical
approach to development. Svelte, particularly with its meta-framework SvelteKit and
its new Svelte 5 "Runes" reactivity model, offers a highly integrated,
"batteries-included" experience. It prioritizes developer ergonomics and aims to
provide a cohesive, polished toolset that accelerates development by making sensible,
opinionated choices for the user.3 In contrast, SolidJS champions architectural purity
and composability. It provides developers with explicit, powerful reactive primitives
and a minimal set of rules, adhering closely to JavaScript standards and offering
unparalleled control and flexibility in a "build-it-your-way" paradigm.4

Historically, SolidJS held an advantage in architectural patterns for large-scale

applications due to its composable nature. However, the introduction of Svelte 5
Runes has fundamentally resolved Svelte's previous limitations in code organization
and state sharing, placing it on equal footing with SolidJS for building scalable and
maintainable systems.6

Consequently, the strategic choice for 2025 hinges on factors beyond raw technical
capability. SvelteKit's maturity, larger community, and more extensive ecosystem
present a lower-risk profile for long-term projects, particularly concerning hiring and
third-party library support.8 SolidJS remains an exceptional choice for specialist
teams focused on performance-critical UIs who value its architectural purity and are
comfortable navigating a smaller, albeit dedicated, ecosystem.

Based on a comprehensive evaluation of all factors—including performance,

scalability, development cost, and long-term risk—this report concludes with a
primary recommendation for Svelte/SvelteKit as the most balanced and strategically
sound choice for the specified project goals.

Section 1: The Architectural Paradigm for 2025: Compilers and

Fine-Grained Reactivity

To properly evaluate Svelte and SolidJS, it is essential to first understand the

architectural shift they represent in the web development landscape. Both
frameworks are at the vanguard of a movement away from the patterns that
dominated the previous decade, addressing fundamental inefficiencies in how web
applications are built and executed.

The Decline of the Virtual DOM

For years, frameworks like React established the Virtual DOM (VDOM) as the standard
for managing UI updates. The VDOM is an in-memory representation of the actual
browser DOM. When an application's state changes, the framework generates a new
VDOM tree and compares it to the previous one—a process called "diffing" or
"reconciliation." The differences are then applied to the real DOM in a batch, which
was more efficient than direct, piecemeal DOM manipulation.
However, this approach carries inherent overhead. The diffing process itself is a
computational expense that runs in the user's browser, consuming CPU cycles and
memory.10 For complex applications with frequent updates, this VDOM overhead can
become a performance bottleneck.12 The rise of Svelte and SolidJS is predicated on
the idea that the VDOM, while a clever solution for its time, is an unnecessary
abstraction that can be eliminated.11 This trend is not isolated; other frameworks like
Vue are now exploring experimental "vapor modes" that similarly drop the VDOM in
favor of a more direct, compiled approach, validating the architectural direction
pioneered by Svelte and SolidJS.7

The Rise of the Compiler

The key to eliminating the VDOM is shifting work from runtime to build-time. Svelte
and SolidJS are both, at their core, compilers.8 Instead of shipping a large framework
runtime library to the browser to interpret the application's code and manage the
VDOM, these frameworks analyze the application code during the build process. They
transform high-level, declarative component code into highly optimized, imperative
vanilla JavaScript that directly manipulates the DOM.13

This compiler-first approach yields several significant benefits:

●​ Smaller Bundle Sizes: Since there is no need to ship a large runtime, the initial
JavaScript payload sent to the user is significantly smaller, leading to faster
downloads and parsing.14
●​ Faster Initial Load: Less JavaScript to download and execute means a quicker
Time to Interactive (TTI) and better Core Web Vitals scores, which is critical for
user experience and SEO.14
●​ Lower Memory Usage: By avoiding an in-memory copy of the DOM, these
frameworks consume less memory, making them more suitable for
resource-constrained devices like older mobile phones.14

Introducing Svelte

Svelte, created by Rich Harris, is the original "disappearing framework".1 Its central
philosophy is that the framework should be a development tool, not a runtime
dependency. The Svelte compiler ingests

.svelte files—which elegantly combine HTML-like markup, CSS, and JavaScript—and

outputs small, efficient JavaScript modules that surgically update the DOM when state
changes.19

Introducing SolidJS

SolidJS, created by Ryan Carniato, takes a different path to the same destination. It
adopts a syntax that is intentionally similar to React, using JSX for templating, which
makes it familiar to a large pool of developers.8 However, under the hood, it operates
on a completely different principle. Like Svelte, it compiles JSX away, but its primary
innovation is a pure, explicit, and highly optimized fine-grained reactivity system. This
system creates a graph of dependencies between data and the DOM, allowing for
surgical updates without a VDOM and, crucially, without re-running component code
after the initial render.10

Shared Philosophy, Divergent Execution

Svelte and SolidJS are united in their rejection of the VDOM and their embrace of
compilers and reactivity. They represent a paradigm where performance is achieved
not by optimizing runtime diffing, but by eliminating it entirely. However, as this report
will detail, their execution of this philosophy diverges significantly. Svelte prioritizes an
integrated developer experience with its own templating language and a
"batteries-included" approach, while SolidJS prioritizes architectural purity and
composability by exposing its reactive primitives directly within standard JavaScript
and JSX.3

The choice between them is therefore not merely a choice of syntax, but of
development philosophy. Furthermore, the core reactive primitive they both rely
on—the signal—is currently the subject of a TC39 proposal for standardization within
JavaScript itself.22 This indicates that the mental model required for these frameworks
is aligning with the future direction of the web platform, significantly de-risking the
choice of either for a long-term project.
Section 2: The Heart of the Matter: A Comparative Analysis of
Reactivity Models

The reactivity system is the engine of a modern framework, dictating how the user
interface responds to changes in data. It is the most fundamental point of
differentiation between Svelte and SolidJS and has profound implications for
developer experience, performance, code structure, and scalability.

2.1 Svelte's Journey: From Compiler Magic to Explicit Runes

Svelte's reactivity model has undergone a significant evolution, a journey that is

critical to understanding its suitability for large-scale applications in 2025.

The "Magical" Era (Svelte 3/4)

Svelte initially gained popularity for its "magical" and intuitive reactivity. In Svelte 3 and
4, reactivity was a feature of the compiler itself, triggered by simple JavaScript
assignments.

Svelte

<script>​
let count = 0;​
​
function increment() {​
count += 1; // This assignment is compiled into reactive code​
}​
​
 $: doubled = count * 2; // The $: label creates a reactive declaration​
</script>​
​
<button on:click={increment}>​
Clicked {count} {count === 1? 'time' : 'times'}​
</button>​
<p>{count} doubled is {doubled}</p>​

This approach was celebrated for its simplicity and minimal boilerplate; developers
could write code that felt very close to vanilla JavaScript.8 However, this magic came
with limitations. The compiler-driven reactivity only worked at the top level of a

.svelte component file. If a developer wanted to extract reactive logic into a separate
JavaScript or TypeScript file to share it across components, they could not simply
copy and paste the code. This restriction made refactoring difficult and often led to
oversized components in larger applications.7

To solve the problem of shared state, Svelte provided a separate, more verbose API
called "stores." While powerful, this created a dual-system where developers had to
use one mental model for local component reactivity and another for shared, external
state, adding cognitive overhead and complexity.4

The Svelte 5 Revolution - Runes

Svelte 5, set to be the standard in 2025, introduces a revolutionary change to its

reactivity system: Runes. Runes are a new set of explicit, function-like symbols that
bring fine-grained, signal-based reactivity to the forefront, directly addressing the
scalability and consistency limitations of the previous model.6

The core Runes are:

●​ $state(): Declares a piece of reactive state (a signal).
●​ $derived(): Declares a derived value that automatically updates when its
dependencies change (a memoized computation).
●​ $effect(): Creates a side effect that runs whenever its dependencies change.
 Svelte

<script>​
let count = $state(0); // Create reactive state with a Rune​
​
function increment() {​
count += 1;​
}​
​
const doubled = $derived(count * 2); // Create a derived value​
</script>​
​
<button on:click={increment}>​
Clicked {count} {count === 1? 'time' : 'times'}​
</button>​
<p>{count} doubled is {doubled}</p>​

The most significant aspect of Runes is that they provide universal reactivity. The
same reactive logic can now be used inside .svelte components and in separate .js/.ts
files, making it trivial to create reusable, reactive stores and hooks.7 This change was
explicitly inspired by the signal-based patterns popularized by frameworks like SolidJS
and makes Svelte a much more robust and scalable choice for large, complex
applications.24

This shift has sparked debate. Some developers feel that Runes betray Svelte's
original ethos of simplicity by adding more explicit syntax and boilerplate, making it
feel more like React.24 However, a growing consensus among developers working on
larger projects is that Runes make the code more predictable, easier to reason about,
more testable, and ultimately more maintainable in the long run.6

2.2 SolidJS: The Purity of the Reactive Graph

SolidJS was designed from the ground up around a pure, explicit, fine-grained
reactivity model. It does not have a history of "magic"; its principles have been
consistent since its inception.
Core Primitives

Solid's reactivity is built on three core primitives that will be familiar from the
discussion of Svelte's Runes 10:
●​ createSignal(): Creates a reactive state primitive. It returns a two-element array: a
getter function to read the value, and a setter function to update it.
●​ createMemo(): Creates a read-only reactive value derived from other signals. It
re-executes only when its dependencies change.
●​ createEffect(): Creates a side effect that runs in response to changes in signal
dependencies.

JavaScript

// SolidJS Reactivity​
import { createSignal, createEffect } from "solid-js";​
​
function Counter() {​
const [count, setCount] = createSignal(0); // Returns a getter and setter​
const doubled = () => count() * 2; // A derived value (or use createMemo for caching)​
​
createEffect(() => {​
console.log("The count is now", count()); // A side effect​
});​
​
return (​
<button onClick={() => setCount(c => c + 1)}>​
Clicked {count()} {count() === 1? 'time' : 'times'}​
</button>​
);​
}​

This design deliberately enforces a separation of reads and writes (Command Query
Responsibility Segregation, or CQRS), which is considered a best practice for
managing data flow in complex systems.3

"Components are just functions"

The most critical mental model shift required for SolidJS is understanding that
components are just setup functions that run only once.27 When a Solid
component is rendered, its function body executes a single time to create the DOM
nodes and establish the reactive graph. It does

not re-run when state changes. Instead, updates from a setCount call flow directly
through the reactive graph to the specific part of the DOM that needs to change (e.g.,
the text node inside the <button>).10

This has a profound consequence for writing JSX: you cannot use standard JavaScript
control flow. For example, this will not work as expected:

JavaScript

// INCORRECT in SolidJS - breaks reactivity​

const = createSignal(true);​
​
return (​
<div>​
{show()? <p>Visible</p> : <p>Hidden</p>}​
</div>​
);​

Because the component function never re-runs, the ternary operator is only ever
evaluated once. To handle conditional rendering or list rendering reactively,
developers must use Solid's built-in control flow components, such as <Show>, <For>,
and <Index>.27 This is a common stumbling block for newcomers but is essential for
preserving the efficiency of the reactive graph.

This architectural choice can be conceptualized using an analogy: React's update

model is like "Plinko," where a change at the top causes a cascade of re-renders down
the component tree. Solid's model is like a "Marble Run," where a change to a piece of
data flows through a predefined track directly to its destination in the DOM,
irrespective of component boundaries.27

2.3 Head-to-Head: Ergonomics, Predictability, and Power

With Svelte 5's adoption of a signal-like model, the two frameworks have converged
architecturally. The comparison now centers on their implementation and philosophy.
●​ Syntax and Explicitness: SolidJS is arguably more explicit. It uses standard JSX
and its reactive primitives are plain JavaScript functions (createSignal).4 Svelte,
even with Runes, remains a domain-specific language. The​
.svelte file format and the $-prefixed Runes are compiler-level abstractions.4 This
abstraction is a deliberate choice by the Svelte team; they keep the underlying
signal implementation private, which allows them to make performance
optimizations in the future without introducing breaking changes to the public
API.23 This is a key strategic difference: Solid exposes its primitives directly, while
Svelte manages them behind a stable, compiled abstraction.
●​ Composability: Because Solid's reactive primitives are just functions in plain
.js/.ts files, it has always excelled at composability. Extracting and sharing reactive
logic is natural and was a primary design goal.3 Svelte 5 Runes are a massive leap
forward for Svelte in this regard, finally enabling the same patterns of reusable
reactive logic. However, one could argue that this is native to Solid's DNA,
whereas it is a (very successful) addition to Svelte's.
●​ Learning Curve Re-evaluated: For a developer coming from React, Solid's JSX
and function components will feel familiar, but mastering the "render-once"
model and the rules of control flow is a significant conceptual challenge.27 For a
developer with a background in vanilla HTML, CSS, and JS, Svelte's​
.svelte files and more intuitive syntax may offer a gentler entry point.8 With Svelte
5, both frameworks now require an understanding of signals, derived state, and
effects, leveling the conceptual playing field.

Ultimately, the introduction of Svelte 5 Runes has shifted the debate. The choice is no
longer between a "magical" framework and an "explicit" one. It is now a choice
between two highly capable, signal-based frameworks with different philosophies:
Svelte's integrated, compiler-abstracted developer experience versus Solid's purist,
unopinionated, and highly composable set of primitives.

Section 3: Empirical Performance and Efficiency Benchmarks

While philosophical differences are important, a decision of this magnitude must be

grounded in quantitative data. This section analyzes the performance and resource
efficiency of Svelte and SolidJS using industry-standard benchmarks, focusing on
client-side execution, server-side throughput, bundle size, and memory usage.

3.1 Client-Side Execution Speed (The JS Framework Benchmark)

The JS Framework Benchmark, maintained by Stefan Krause, is the de facto standard

for measuring the raw DOM manipulation speed of web frameworks.32 It performs a
series of stressful operations, such as creating, updating, swapping, and removing
thousands of rows in a table, to measure a framework's rendering performance under
pressure.32

Historically, SolidJS has been the undisputed champion of this benchmark,

consistently ranking at or near the top, often outperforming even vanilla JavaScript
implementations in some tests. It typically held a performance advantage over Svelte
3 and 4, particularly in list-based operations, due to its highly sophisticated list
reconciliation algorithm compared to Svelte's more primitive one.34

However, the release of Svelte 5 has dramatically altered this landscape. With its new
Rune-based reactivity engine, Svelte 5's performance has seen a monumental
improvement. In recent benchmark runs, Svelte 5 is now consistently ranked in the
"S-Tier" alongside SolidJS, a sentiment echoed by Solid's own creator, Ryan Carniato.1
The latest results show the two frameworks trading the top spots, with performance
differences so minimal they often fall within the benchmark's margin of error.2

The conclusion for 2025 is unequivocal: for raw client-side rendering speed, the
difference between Svelte 5 and SolidJS is negligible for all but the most extreme
edge cases. Both are phenomenally fast, and any decision based on these
micro-benchmark differences would be misguided. Real-world application
performance will be far more influenced by factors like data fetching, code
architecture, and image optimization.1

3.2 Server-Side Throughput (RPS) and Core Web Vitals

For modern applications, performance is not limited to the client. Server-Side

Rendering (SSR) is crucial for fast initial page loads (improving Time to First Byte, or
TTFB) and Search Engine Optimization (SEO). Recent SSR benchmarks measuring
requests per second (RPS) show that both frameworks are top-tier performers. One
2024 benchmark placed Svelte 5 slightly ahead of SolidJS (968 RPS vs. 907 RPS), with
both significantly outperforming older-generation frameworks.38 This demonstrates
that both are excellent choices for building applications that need high-throughput
server rendering.

This server performance, combined with their small client-side bundles and efficient
hydration mechanisms, translates directly into excellent Core Web Vitals scores
(Largest Contentful Paint, First Input Delay/Interaction to Next Paint, and Cumulative
Layout Shift).14 Both SvelteKit and SolidStart are designed to produce highly optimized
outputs that perform well on these critical user-centric metrics.9 One minor technical
note is that Solid's documentation has mentioned that its hydration process can be
sensitive to the use of IDs, a detail to be aware of during implementation.38

3.3 Resource Footprint: Bundle Size and Memory Usage

Resource efficiency is a key advantage of compiler-based frameworks. Both Svelte

and SolidJS excel in this area, but with important nuances.

The Bundle Size Nuance

A common point of comparison is the "Hello World" bundle size, but this can be
misleading for large-scale applications.
●​ Small Applications: For minimal applications or single components, Svelte is the
undisputed winner. Its "disappearing" nature means it has virtually no fixed
runtime cost, resulting in bundles as small as 2-3 KB, compared to Solid's baseline
of around 7 KB.8
●​ Large Applications: As an application grows, the dynamic changes. Multiple
sources, including Solid's creator, assert that Solid's architecture scales more
efficiently in terms of bundle size.3 The reason is that Svelte's compiler inlines the
necessary framework logic into each component, which can lead to some code
duplication across a large application. In contrast, Solid has a slightly larger but
highly optimized and​
shared runtime. This runtime is included once, and its size does not increase
significantly as more components are added. The RealWorld demo application, a
standardized medium-complexity app, is often cited as an example where the
Solid implementation has a final bundle size that is 25% smaller than the Svelte
version.26 This is a critical consideration for a large, long-term project where
bundle size can creep up over time.

Memory Usage

Both frameworks are exceptionally memory-efficient due to the absence of a VDOM.14

Benchmarks consistently place them as the top two performers in memory
consumption. Some tests show Svelte with a marginal lead in startup memory usage
(~15 MB vs. ~18 MB for Solid).17 Solid employs specific optimizations to reduce memory
pressure, such as using

node.cloneNode for creating list items instead of document.createElement, which is

more efficient for repeated structures.34 For all practical purposes, both frameworks
are leaders in memory efficiency.

Performance & Efficiency Scorecard (2025 Projection)

Metric Svelte 5 SolidJS 1.9+ Analysis &

 Justification

JS-Framework-Ben 5/5 5/5 Both are S-Tier;

chmark (Score) performance is not a
meaningful
differentiator in 2025.
Differences are
negligible and
fluctuate between
runs.1

SSR Throughput 5/5 5/5 Both are excellent.

(RPS) Svelte shows a slight
edge in one recent
benchmark (~968 vs
~907 RPS), but both
are far ahead of older
frameworks and
top-tier choices.38

Initial Bundle Size Excellent Very Good Svelte wins for

(min+gz) minimal applications
due to its
"disappearing"
nature (~2-3 KB vs ~7
KB).8

Bundle Size Scaling Very Good Excellent Solid's shared

(Large App) runtime scales more
efficiently than
Svelte's
per-component
compiled output in
large applications, a
crucial long-term
advantage.3

Memory Usage Excellent Excellent Both are leaders due

(Startup) to no VDOM. Svelte
has a slight edge in
some startup
benchmarks (~15MB
vs ~18MB), but both
are top-class.17
Section 4: The Application Lifecycle: Development, Scalability,
and Maintenance

Beyond raw performance metrics, the long-term success and total cost of ownership
of an application are determined by qualitative factors. This section assesses how
Svelte and SolidJS compare across the development lifecycle, from initial onboarding
to long-term maintenance and scalability.

4.1 Onboarding and Learning Curve

The ease with which a team can become productive in a new framework is a direct
driver of initial development cost.
●​ Svelte: Svelte is widely regarded as having one of the gentlest learning curves for
developers new to modern frameworks. Its syntax is intentionally close to plain
HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, reducing the number of new concepts one must
learn.8 The single-file​
.svelte component format is intuitive and easy to grasp.15 However, for developers
deeply experienced with React, there can be an "unlearning" process as they
must adapt to Svelte's patterns and away from the VDOM mental model.8 The
introduction of Runes in Svelte 5 adds a new layer of explicit concepts (state,
derived, effect) that must be learned, but this also serves to make the reactivity
model more consistent and predictable across the entire application.6
●​ SolidJS: For the vast pool of developers already proficient in React, SolidJS offers
a familiar entry point. Its use of JSX and hook-like primitives (createSignal,
createEffect) makes the initial syntax immediately recognizable.30 The primary
learning challenge is not the syntax, but the fundamental paradigm shift.
Internalizing that components run only once and that reactivity is managed
through a graph—requiring the use of control-flow components like​
<For> and <Show>—is a significant mental hurdle that must be overcome to write
effective SolidJS code.5

In summary, Svelte likely offers a faster onboarding path for a team with diverse or
less framework-specific experience. SolidJS is likely faster for a seasoned React team
to pick up, but only if they are prepared to fully embrace its unique "render-once"
mental model.

4.2 Developer Experience (DX) and Long-Term Maintainability

Developer experience and code maintainability are crucial for a project with a
five-year horizon, directly impacting productivity and the ability to evolve the
application.
●​ Svelte: Svelte is consistently praised for its superior developer experience, often
described as a "joy to use".45 The minimal boilerplate and the ability to write less
code to achieve the same result are major benefits.3 The co-location of markup,
scoped styles, and logic within​
.svelte files is a feature many developers appreciate for its clarity and
organization.15 While some developers have found the historic inability to define
multiple components in a single file to be restrictive 46, the overall sentiment is
highly positive. The architectural improvements in Svelte 5, including universal
reactivity via Runes and enhanced TypeScript support, are monumental for
long-term maintainability. They make it far easier to structure, refactor, and test
large codebases, directly addressing the primary weakness of earlier versions.6
●​ SolidJS: SolidJS provides a developer experience that feels like a more refined
and performant version of React.5 Its lack of "magic" and closer adherence to
JavaScript principles is often cited as a key advantage, as it makes the code's
behavior easier to reason about.3 The framework's emphasis on composability
and its seamless integration with vanilla JavaScript libraries are significant
strengths for long-term maintenance, as developers can leverage standard JS
patterns without fighting a framework's rendering lifecycle.5 The architectural
patterns it encourages, such as unidirectional data flow and read/write
segregation, promote clean, maintainable code.3

Case studies confirm the viability of both for production systems. Svelte is used at
scale by prominent companies like The New York Times, Spotify, Square, and
Chess.com, proving its robustness.8 Reports of migrations to Svelte highlight the
speed and user-friendliness of the process.47 SolidJS is successfully used in highly
demanding, performance-critical applications like data-intensive dashboards and
micro-frontends.12 A detailed account from Radware's engineering team praised
Solid's performance and ergonomics but also noted the initial "mind-bender" of
adapting to its unique patterns. Another team reported that while greenfield Solid
projects required a 15-20% greater time investment upfront to establish patterns, this
was recouped over time through easier maintenance and superior application
performance.5

4.3 The Testing Story

A robust testing strategy is non-negotiable for a long-term, scalable application. In

this domain, both Svelte and SolidJS have matured to offer excellent, modern testing
solutions.
●​ Svelte: The official Svelte documentation recommends Vitest as the test runner,
integrated within the Vite ecosystem.50 The community standard for component
testing is​
@testing-library/svelte, which builds upon the well-established principles of the
Testing Library family to encourage writing tests that resemble how a user
interacts with the application.20 The most significant advancement for testing in
Svelte comes with Svelte 5 Runes. Because reactive logic can now be extracted
into plain​
.ts files, it can be unit-tested in isolation without the overhead of mounting a
component in a DOM environment. This is a transformative improvement for
testability and code quality compared to Svelte 4, where logic was often tightly
coupled to the component rendering lifecycle.7
●​ SolidJS: The testing story for SolidJS is similarly strong. The official
documentation also recommends Vitest and provides detailed guides for setup.52
The​
@solidjs/testing-library package is the official and well-supported solution for
component testing.52 Solid's architecture has always been conducive to testing.
Reactive primitives can be tested in isolation using the​
renderHook utility, and components are tested through the familiar Testing
Library APIs.52

The key takeaway is that for a project starting in 2025, testing is not a significant
differentiator between the two. Both frameworks provide first-class support for
modern testing practices, enabling teams to build reliable and maintainable
applications with high confidence.
The evolution of Svelte with version 5 is the most critical factor in this entire analysis
of the application lifecycle. By introducing Runes, Svelte has effectively neutralized
SolidJS's historical advantage in architectural patterns for large-scale, maintainable
applications. This levels the playing field, making both frameworks technically viable
for complex, long-term projects and shifting the focus of the decision towards their
ecosystems and development philosophies.

Section 5: The Ecosystem and Strategic Viability (2025-2030)

Choosing a framework is not just a technical decision; it is a strategic investment in an

ecosystem. The long-term success of a project depends on the maturity of the
framework's tooling, the availability of third-party libraries, the size and health of its
community, and the state of the hiring market.

5.1 The Meta-Framework Showdown: SvelteKit vs. SolidStart

Modern web applications are rarely built with just a UI library; they require a
"meta-framework" to handle routing, server-side rendering, and data fetching. For
Svelte, this is SvelteKit. For SolidJS, it is SolidStart.
●​ Common Ground: Both SvelteKit and SolidStart are built on top of Vite, the
next-generation frontend tooling, which provides an exceptional developer
experience with features like lightning-fast Hot Module Replacement (HMR).54
Both are full-stack frameworks that offer a comprehensive suite of features out of
the box, including file-based routing, Server-Side Rendering (SSR), Static Site
Generation (SSG), and API endpoints (serverless functions).9
●​ SvelteKit: SvelteKit is widely considered to be the more mature, polished, and
"batteries-included" of the two.1 It presents a highly integrated and opinionated
system that provides developers with a clear "happy path." A standout feature is
its data-loading mechanism, which uses​
load functions in +page.server.js (for server-only data) and +page.js files. This
pattern, heavily inspired by Remix, creates a clean and robust separation between
backend and frontend concerns and simplifies data fetching logic immensely.46
●​ SolidStart: SolidStart is also a powerful framework, but it is generally perceived
 as being less mature and more of a composable set of building blocks rather than
a fully integrated solution.9 Its development history has been less stable, with one
team reporting a "huge pain" migrating from an early beta to the 1.0 release.5
While now stable, its ecosystem of surrounding tools, such as the router and
metadata handling, can feel less cohesive than SvelteKit's all-in-one package.55 It
offers more flexibility but less out-of-the-box guidance, requiring teams to make
more architectural decisions themselves.

5.2 Community, Tooling, and Third-Party Libraries

The strength of a framework's ecosystem is a direct measure of its productivity

potential.
●​ Community Size and Activity: Svelte possesses a significantly larger, more
established, and faster-growing community. This is reflected in metrics like npm
downloads, GitHub stars, and the sheer volume of available tutorials, articles, and
forum discussions.3 Solid's community is smaller but is consistently described as
being highly knowledgeable, passionate, and exceptionally supportive in forums
like Discord.3
●​ UI Components and Libraries: Svelte's ecosystem maturity gives it a clear
advantage here. There is a rich and diverse collection of third-party libraries,
including comprehensive UI component sets (Svelte Material UI, Flowbite Svelte,
Skeleton, Carbon), advanced data grids, charting libraries, and form management
tools.45 The "awesome-svelte" resource list is extensive and well-populated.
Solid's ecosystem is developing but is less comprehensive.30 Key libraries do exist,
such as official wrappers for essential tools like TanStack Query and TanStack
Table, and several UI libraries like the headless toolkit Kobalte and Solid Bootstrap
are available.12 A notable advantage for Solid is that its close adherence to
JavaScript standards often makes it easier to integrate vanilla JS libraries without
needing a specific wrapper, as there is no complex framework rendering model to
contend with.3

5.3 Market Adoption and Hiring Landscape

For a project with a 5+ year lifespan, the ability to hire and retain talent is a critical
business consideration.
●​ Adoption Trends: While React remains the dominant market leader, Svelte is
experiencing rapid growth and is widely recognized as a "rising star" and a
"serious contender" for the top tier of frameworks.8 SolidJS is also gaining
traction and respect, especially within performance-focused circles, but it is
starting from a much smaller user base.8 Projections for 2025 and beyond see
Svelte/SvelteKit continuing this strong growth trajectory, while SolidJS is expected
to solidify its position as the go-to choice for high-performance niche
applications.11
●​ Job Market: The hiring landscape directly reflects these adoption trends. The
number of job postings mentioning React is immense. Opportunities for Svelte
developers are growing steadily but are still comparatively limited. Job postings
that specifically require SolidJS are currently emerging but rare.8 For a CTO or
engineering leader planning to build and scale a team over the next five years, the
larger and more rapidly expanding talent pool for Svelte represents a significant
pragmatic advantage and a lower hiring risk.

Meta-Framework Feature Comparison (SvelteKit vs. SolidStart)

Feature SvelteKit SolidStart Analysis &

Justification

Maturity & Stability Very High High (Post-1.0) SvelteKit has a

longer, more stable
history. SolidStart
had a rocky beta but
is now stable on v1.0,
though it is less
battle-tested in the
wild.5

Philosophy Integrated / Composable / SvelteKit feels like a

Opinionated Unopinionated complete, cohesive
product with a clear
"happy path."
SolidStart feels more
 like a powerful set of
building blocks
requiring more
developer-led
architecture.1

Routing File-based, Nested, flexible Both are powerful.

well-defined SvelteKit's is arguably
simpler and more
intuitive for standard
use cases, with a very
clear structure.9

Data Loading Standardized (load Flexible (Route data SvelteKit's

functions) functions) Remix-inspired data
loading pattern is a
major DX win,
providing a clear,
type-safe, and robust
way to handle
server/client data
fetching that cleanly
separates
concerns.46

Ecosystem Excellent Good SvelteKit is more

Integration tightly integrated with
the broader Svelte
ecosystem.
SolidStart's
surrounding tools can
feel more like
separate pieces
rather than a single,
unified whole.55

Community & Docs Larger Smaller SvelteKit benefits

from the larger Svelte
community, resulting
in more examples,
tutorials, third-party
starters, and readily
available solutions to
common problems.9
Section 6: Security Posture Analysis

In the modern web, application security is not an afterthought but a foundational

requirement. This analysis assesses the security posture of Svelte and SolidJS,
focusing on their built-in protections against common vulnerabilities like Cross-Site
Scripting (XSS) and the best practices required for a secure implementation.

6.1 Built-in Protections and Common Pitfalls

The good news is that both Svelte and SolidJS, like most modern frameworks, are
designed with security in mind and provide robust default protections against XSS.
●​ Default Security: By default, both frameworks automatically escape any dynamic
data that is injected into the template or JSX. This means that if a string
containing malicious HTML script tags (<script>alert('xss')</script>) is passed as a
variable, it will be rendered as inert text on the page rather than being executed
by the browser. This single feature prevents the most common class of XSS
attacks.61
●​ Known Vulnerabilities (CVEs): No framework is infallible, and both have had
documented security vulnerabilities in their history. An analysis of these
vulnerabilities is instructive:
○​ Svelte: Past CVEs have highlighted specific edge cases. One vulnerability
(CVE-2022-25875) arose from improper escaping of attributes during
Server-Side Rendering (SSR) when an object with a custom toString() method
was used, potentially allowing for script injection.63 Another vulnerability was
discovered due to a mismatch in sanitization rules for content inside a​
<noscript> tag, which could also be exploited.61
○​ SolidJS: SolidJS has also had a documented XSS vulnerability related to the
improper sanitization of user input when inserted directly into JSX
fragments.65
●​ The Common Pitfall: The most significant security risk in both frameworks is
developer error, specifically the intentional bypassing of built-in protections. Both
frameworks provide a mechanism to render raw HTML—in Svelte, this is the
{@html...} tag, and in Solid, it is the innerHTML property on a JSX element. These
are the equivalent of React's dangerouslySetInnerHTML. Using these features
 with unsanitized user-provided content is the most direct path to creating an XSS
vulnerability.62

The pattern emerging from the historical CVEs for both frameworks is that
vulnerabilities are most likely to be found not in the basic, everyday rendering paths,
but in more complex edge cases. These often involve interactions between different
systems, such as Server-Side Rendering, hydration, and the handling of non-standard
data types or HTML tags. This suggests that while the core client-side rendering is
well-secured by default, security audits must pay special attention to these more
complex areas of an application.

6.2 Best Practices for a Secure Implementation

Achieving a secure application is a shared responsibility between the framework and

the development team. The framework provides the tools, but the team must use
them correctly. The following practices are essential for any application built with
Svelte or SolidJS:
●​ Input Sanitization: This is the cardinal rule of web security. All input from users
or external systems must be treated as untrusted. It should be rigorously
validated and sanitized on the server before being stored in a database or
rendered back to any user. If the use of innerHTML or {@html} is absolutely
unavoidable, the content must first be passed through a robust sanitization library
like DOMPurify to strip out any potentially malicious code.62
●​ Content Security Policy (CSP): A strong CSP is a critical, defense-in-depth
security layer. A CSP is an HTTP header that tells the browser which sources of
content (scripts, styles, images, etc.) are trusted and allowed to be executed.
Even if an XSS vulnerability is accidentally introduced into the code, a properly
configured CSP can prevent the malicious script from running, neutralizing the
attack.61 The official SolidStart documentation provides excellent, explicit
guidance on how to implement a modern, nonce-based CSP using middleware, a
practice that is equally applicable to SvelteKit applications.62
●​ Server-Level Security: Other critical security measures are handled at the
application server level, typically within the meta-framework's middleware. These
include protection against Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), which prevents
attackers from tricking a user into submitting malicious requests, and proper
configuration of Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) headers to control which
 other domains can access the application's APIs.62

In conclusion, neither framework has a definitive security advantage over the other.
Both provide strong default protections but are susceptible to vulnerabilities
introduced by developer error or in complex edge cases. A successful security
strategy relies on adhering to best practices: rigorous input sanitization, the
implementation of a strong CSP, and diligent code reviews, particularly for SSR and
data-handling logic.

Section 7: Final Analysis and Strategic Recommendation

This analysis has conducted a comprehensive, multi-vector comparison of Svelte and

SolidJS, evaluating their architectural underpinnings, empirical performance,
developer ergonomics, and long-term ecosystem viability. The objective is to provide
a clear, actionable recommendation for selecting a framework to build a
high-performance, secure, and scalable application launching in 2025, with a
minimum five-year maintenance lifecycle.

7.1 Framework Decision Matrix

To synthesize the findings from the preceding sections, the following decision matrix
scores each framework against the key criteria derived from the project requirements.
Scores are on a 1-5 scale, where 5 is the highest.

Criterion Svelte / SvelteKit SolidJS / SolidStart Justification

Raw Performance 5/5 5/5 Both are S-Tier

performers in 2025.
With Svelte 5, raw
speed is no longer a
meaningful
differentiator
between them.1
Bundle Size / 4/5 4/5 Svelte excels in
Efficiency minimal apps, while
Solid's shared
runtime scales more
efficiently in large
applications. On
balance, they are
equally efficient for
different use cases.8

Learning Curve 5/5 4/5 Svelte's intuitive

syntax and .svelte
files are more
approachable for a
broader range of
developers. Solid's
"render-once" mental
model presents a
significant, though
surmountable,
hurdle.8

Developer 5/5 4/5 This is subjective, but

Experience (DX) SvelteKit's highly
integrated, polished,
and
"batteries-included"
nature provides a
smoother and more
guided
out-of-the-box
experience, reducing
cognitive load.3

Scalability & 4.5/5 4.5/5 Svelte 5's Runes have

Maintainability resolved its historical
scalability issues,
placing it on par with
Solid's excellent,
composable
architecture for
building large,
maintainable
applications.6
 Ecosystem Maturity 4/5 3/5 Svelte's ecosystem of
UI libraries, tools, and
learning resources is
significantly larger,
more mature, and
better integrated via
SvelteKit, reducing
development
friction.9

Security Posture 4/5 4/5 Both frameworks

provide strong
default security but
require equivalent
levels of developer
diligence (CSP, input
sanitization) to be
truly secure. There is
no clear winner.61

Hiring & Market 3/5 2/5 Svelte has a

Viability noticeably larger and
more rapidly growing
talent pool and
stronger market
adoption signals,
which is a crucial
pragmatic
consideration that
de-risks the project
long-term.8

Overall Score 34.5 / 40 30.5 / 40

7.2 Conclusive Recommendation

Based on the exhaustive analysis presented in this report, the primary

recommendation for a team launching a new, high-performance, and scalable
application in 2025 with a long-term maintenance plan is Svelte, leveraged through
its meta-framework, SvelteKit.
This recommendation is based on the following synthesis of findings:
1.​ Performance Parity: Svelte 5 has successfully closed the performance gap with
SolidJS. The primary historical reason to choose SolidJS for its raw speed
advantage is no longer a compelling factor. Both frameworks offer world-class
performance.
2.​ Architectural Soundness: The introduction of Runes in Svelte 5 has
fundamentally addressed the framework's previous architectural weaknesses
concerning scalability and code organization. Svelte is now a robust and suitable
choice for building large, complex, and maintainable applications, putting it on
equal footing with SolidJS in this critical area.
3.​ Superior Ecosystem and Lower Risk: SvelteKit provides a more mature,
polished, and integrated developer experience than SolidStart. This translates
directly to higher productivity and lower initial development costs. Furthermore,
Svelte's significantly larger community, more extensive ecosystem of third-party
tools, and more favorable position in the hiring market provide a substantial
strategic advantage, reducing project risk over a five-year horizon.

For the stated goals of building a high-performance, secure, scalable, and

low-development-cost application, SvelteKit offers the most balanced and compelling
package. It combines the elite performance of a modern compiled framework with a
superior developer experience and a lower-risk ecosystem profile.

When to Choose SolidJS

Despite the primary recommendation, SolidJS remains an outstanding piece of

technology and is the superior choice in specific contexts. A team should choose
SolidJS / SolidStart if their priorities align with the following profile:
●​ Architectural Purity is Paramount: The team places the highest value on
architectural purity, explicit control, and maximum composability. They prefer to
build solutions from first principles using powerful, unopinionated primitives.
●​ Extreme Performance-Critical UIs: The project involves building exceptionally
interactive and data-intensive user interfaces, such as financial trading platforms,
real-time data visualization dashboards, or complex editors, where even the
slightest performance edge and granular control over updates are
business-critical.
●​ Deep React Expertise and a Desire for Evolution: The development team
 consists of highly experienced React developers who are frustrated with React's
complexities (hooks rules, VDOM overhead) and are willing to invest the time to
master Solid's reactive mental model to achieve a cleaner and more performant
development paradigm.

In conclusion, the choice between Svelte and SolidJS in 2025 is no longer a simple
trade-off between performance and developer experience. It is a more nuanced
decision about development philosophy. While both are technically excellent,
SvelteKit presents the most pragmatic, productive, and lowest-risk path to
success for the majority of modern web application projects.

Works cited

1.​ Svelte 5 render performance ranked as S Tier by SolidJS creator Ryan Carniato -
Reddit, accessed July 24, 2025,
https://www.reddit.com/r/sveltejs/comments/1i9cpgb/svelte_5_render_performan
ce_ranked_as_s_tier_by/
2.​ Svelte (5) finally beats Solid (1.9) in Chrome 131 Tests : r/solidjs - Reddit, accessed
July 24, 2025,
https://www.reddit.com/r/solidjs/comments/1h2et3e/svelte_5_finally_beats_solid_1
9_in_chrome_131/
3.​ Solid JS compared to svelte? : r/solidjs - Reddit, accessed July 24, 2025,
https://www.reddit.com/r/solidjs/comments/11mt02n/solid_ js_compared_to_svelte
/
4.​ Difference between how Solid and Svelte works? - Stack Overflow, accessed July
24, 2025,
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/75772559/difference-between-how-solid-an
d-svelte-works
5.​ Solid in larger apps : r/solidjs - Reddit, accessed July 24, 2025,
https://www.reddit.com/r/solidjs/comments/1fb50sq/solid_in_larger_apps/
6.​ I've been championing Svelte for 3+ years, and runes are killing me. : r/sveltejs -
Reddit, accessed July 24, 2025,
https://www.reddit.com/r/sveltejs/comments/1htup7k/ive_been_championing_svel
te_for_3_years_and_runes/
7.​ CascadiaJS 2024: Optimize for vibes - Geoff Rich, accessed July 24, 2025,
https://geoffrich.net/posts/cascadiajs-2024/
8.​ Modern JavaScript Frameworks Compared: Svelte, Qwik, React, and SolidJS -
Medium, accessed July 24, 2025,
https://medium.com/@rajamails19/modern-javascript-frameworks-compared-sve
lte-qwik-react-and-solidjs-967face904f1
9.​ A Comparative Analysis of SvelteKit and SolidStart: Two Cutting ..., accessed July
24, 2025,
https://medium.com/@akoredealokan50/a-comparative-analysis-of-sveltekit-and
-solidstart-two-cutting-edge-frontend-frameworks-bd8dbd6ea40f
10.​What is SolidJS? Understanding the Modern Reactive Library - Wisp CMS,
accessed July 24, 2025,
https://www.wisp.blog/blog/what-is-solidjs-understanding-the-modern-reactive-
library
11.​ Svelte vs. SolidJS vs. React: Which Frontend Framework Wins in 2024?, accessed
July 24, 2025,
https://www.scriptgurudigitalsolutions.com/blog/beyond-react-exploring-svelte-
solidjs
12.​SolidJS vs React: Which Framework Makes More Sense in 2025? - Medium,
accessed July 24, 2025,
https://medium.com/@bgokmen/solidjs-vs-react-which-framework-makes-more
-sense-in-2025-c23db22cce7e
13.​Svelte Compiler: How It Works - Daily.dev, accessed July 24, 2025,
https://daily.dev/blog/svelte-compiler-how-it-works
14.​SolidJS vs Svelte vs Astro Feature Analysis of Web Frameworks - tpsTech,
accessed July 24, 2025,
https://tpstech.au/blog/solidjs-vs-svelte-vs-astro-comparison/
15.​Getting started with Svelte - Learn web development | MDN, accessed July 24,
2025,
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Learn_web_development/Core/Framew
orks_libraries/Svelte_getting_started
16.​The Svelte compiler: How it works - DEV Community, accessed July 24, 2025,
https://dev.to/joshnuss/svelte-compiler-under-the-hood-4j20
17.​Frontend Frameworks in 2025: What's Hot, What's Not, and What's Next -
Leverture, accessed July 24, 2025,
https://www.leverture.com/post/frontend-frameworks-in-2025-whats-hot-whats
-not-and-whats-next
18.​Best High-Performance Frontend Frameworks in 2025 - Brisk Tech Solutions,
accessed July 24, 2025,
https://brisktechsol.com/performant-frontend-frameworks/
19.​A Comparative Analysis of Svelte and SolidJS: The Future of Reactive Frontend
Development | by KIzito Horlong | Medium, accessed July 24, 2025,
https://medium.com/@naanma4kizito/a-comparative-analysis-of-svelte-and-soli
djs-the-future-of-reactive-frontend-development-de26991e52bb
20.​Svelte Testing - testRigor AI-Based Automated Testing Tool, accessed July 24,
2025, https://testrigor.com/svelte-testing/
21.​A Definitive Guide to Reactivity in Solid.js - OpenReplay Blog, accessed July 24,
2025, https://blog.openreplay.com/reactivity-in-solid/
22.​A Decade of SolidJS - DEV Community, accessed July 24, 2025,
https://dev.to/this-is-learning/a-decade-of-solidjs-32f4
23.​Svelte v5 runes benchmark results & discussion #13277 - GitHub, accessed July
24, 2025, https://github.com/sveltejs/svelte/discussions/13277
24.​Svelte 5 runes— only dead fish follow the current | by Kim Korte - Medium,
accessed July 24, 2025,
https://medium.com/@kimkorte/svelte-5-runes-only-dead-fish-follow-the-curren
 t-6e372a74918d
25.​Svelte 5 is not JavaScript | Hacker News, accessed July 24, 2025,
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43091596
26.​Comparison with other Libraries - Docs | SolidJS, accessed July 24, 2025,
https://www.solidjs.com/guides/comparison
27.​I tried SolidJS as a React dev and here's what I learned : r/reactjs - Reddit,
accessed July 24, 2025,
https://www.reddit.com/r/reactjs/comments/1m0ib3k/i_tried_solidjs_as_a_react_d
ev_and_heres_what_i/
28.​Qwik Vs SolidJs Reactivity - Reddit, accessed July 24, 2025,
https://www.reddit.com/r/qwik/comments/1158u2y/qwik_vs_solidjs_reactivity/
29.​List rendering - Solid Docs, accessed July 24, 2025,
https://docs.solidjs.com/concepts/control-flow/list-rendering
30.​Comparing Svelte and SolidJS: Two Niche Frontend Technologies | by Wisdom
Akpabio, accessed July 24, 2025,
https://medium.com/@bishoprealityking/comparing-svelte-and-solidjs-two-niche
-frontend-technologies-05ac88747f5c
31.​We Shipped to Production with Solid.js – A Dev Experience - Radware, accessed
July 24, 2025,
https://www.radware.com/blog/posts/we-shipped-to-production-with-solid-js-%
E2%80%93-a-dev-exp/
32.​krausest/js-framework-benchmark: A comparison of the ... - GitHub, accessed
July 24, 2025, https://github.com/krausest/js-framework-benchmark
33.​Stefan_Krause.blog(), accessed July 24, 2025, https://www.stefankrause.net/
34.​JavaScript UI Compilers: Comparing Svelte and Solid | by Ryan Carniato -
Medium, accessed July 24, 2025,
https://ryansolid.medium.com/javascript-ui-compilers-comparing-svelte-and-soli
d-cbcba2120cea
35.​Thinking Granular: How is SolidJS so Performant? - DEV Community, accessed
July 24, 2025,
https://dev.to/ryansolid/thinking-granular-how-is-solidjs-so-performant-4g37
36.​Interactive Results - GitHub Pages, accessed July 24, 2025,
https://krausest.github.io/js-framework-benchmark/current.html
37.​Discussion of JavaScript Frameworks - Heading into 2025 - DEV Community,
accessed July 24, 2025,
https://dev.to/this-is-learning/javascript-frameworks-heading-into-2025-hkb/com
ments
38.​An SSR Performance Showdown - Platformatic Blog, accessed July 24, 2025,
https://blog.platformatic.dev/ssr-performance-showdown
39.​Which framework is fastest? - Design Gurus, accessed July 24, 2025,
https://www.designgurus.io/answers/detail/which-framework-is-fastest
40.​We built 2 apps: Svelte 5 vs Solid.js — here's the shocking winner! - YouTube,
accessed July 24, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tjU3HMDx70
41.​Comparison of JS Frameworks in terms of size of built js file - GitHub, accessed
July 24, 2025, https://github.com/MarioVieilledent/js-framework-comparison
42.​The Difference you didn't know existed between Solid.js and Svelte - DEV
Community, accessed July 24, 2025,
https://dev.to/shariqahmed525/the-difference-you-didnt-know-existed-between-
solidjs-and-svelte-4pd7
43.​JavaScript frameworks in 2025. Insights from 6000 Developers | TSH.io, accessed
July 24, 2025, https://tsh.io/blog/javascript-frameworks-frontend-development/
44.​In 2024, should we still use React and check out other frameworks too? - DEV
Community, accessed July 24, 2025,
https://dev.to/jawnchuks/in-2024-should-we-still-use-react-and-check-out-othe
r-frameworks-too-2hle
45.​Best 15 Svelte UI Components & Libraries for Enterprise-Grade Apps - DEV
Community, accessed July 24, 2025,
https://dev.to/olga_tash/best-15-svelte-ui-components-libraries-for-enterprise-g
rade-apps-23gc
46.​Story on revisiting Svelte/Kit after moving to Solid, then Remix : r/sveltejs - Reddit,
accessed July 24, 2025,
https://www.reddit.com/r/sveltejs/comments/10e6l0p/story_on_revisiting_sveltekit
_after_moving_to/
47.​Svelte vs React: A Comprehensive Comparison for Developers - Strapi, accessed
July 24, 2025, https://strapi.io/blog/svelte-vs-react-comparison
48.​Large Scale Apps with Svelte and TypeScript - Damiano Fusco, accessed July 24,
2025, https://www.damianofusco.com/book-sample-svelte-typescript/
49.​What are some real-world examples of websites or apps built with Svelte? |
MoldStud, accessed July 24, 2025,
https://moldstud.com/articles/p-what-are-some-real-world-examples-of-websit
es-or-apps-built-with-svelte
50.​Testing • Docs • Svelte, accessed July 24, 2025,
https://svelte.dev/docs/svelte/testing
51.​testing-library/svelte-testing-library: :chipmunk: Simple and complete Svelte DOM
testing utilities that encourage good testing practices - GitHub, accessed July 24,
2025, https://github.com/testing-library/svelte-testing-library
52.​Testing - Solid Docs, accessed July 24, 2025,
https://docs.solidjs.com/guides/testing
53.​solidjs/solid-testing-library: Simple and complete Solid testing utilities that
encourage good testing practices. - GitHub, accessed July 24, 2025,
https://github.com/solidjs/solid-testing-library
54.​SolidStart vs SvelteKit - Bejamas, accessed July 24, 2025,
https://bejamas.com/compare/solidstart-vs-sveltekit
55.​Svelte5: A Less Favorable Vue3 - Hacker News, accessed July 24, 2025,
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43298048
56.​Awesome Svelte | Curated list of awesome lists | Project-Awesome.org, accessed
July 24, 2025, https://project-awesome.org/TheComputerM/awesome-svelte
57.​Awesome SvelteKit, accessed July 24, 2025, https://collect4sveltekit.vercel.app/
58.​awesome-solid-js - Codesandbox, accessed July 24, 2025,
http://codesandbox.io/p/github/NaiJamesz/awesome-solid-js
59.​Top 4 JavaScript Frameworks in 2025: React, Angular, Vue, Svelte - Java Code
Geeks, accessed July 24, 2025,
https://www.javacodegeeks.com/2025/02/top-4-javascript-frameworks-in-2025-
react-angular-vue-svelte.html
60.​The Rise of “Disappearing” Frameworks: Why Astro & SolidJS Might Replace
React in 2025 | by Victor Onyedikachi - JavaScript in Plain English, accessed July
24, 2025,
https://javascript.plainenglish.io/the-rise-of-disappearing-frameworks-why-astro
-solidjs-might-replace-react-in-2025-6f6ad6f24963
61.​Cross-site Scripting (XSS) in svelte | CVE-2024-45047 | Snyk, accessed July 24,
2025, https://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-SVELTE-7856103
62.​Security - SolidStart Docs, accessed July 24, 2025,
https://docs.solidjs.com/solid-start/guides/security
63.​Svelte-Cross-site Scripting - ScanRepeat, accessed July 24, 2025,
https://scanrepeat.com/vulnerability-database/svelte-cross-site-scripting
64.​Cross-site Scripting (XSS) in svelte - Snyk Vulnerability Database, accessed July
24, 2025, https://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-SVELTE-2414372
65.​Cross-site Scripting (XSS) in solid-js | CVE-2025-27109 - Snyk Vulnerability
Database, accessed July 24, 2025,
https://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-SOLIDJS-8743940
66.​Cross-site scripting (XSS) - Security - MDN Web Docs, accessed July 24, 2025,
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Security/Attacks/XSS