Chapter 6 - Lecture Notes
Chapter 6 - Lecture Notes
▪ Introduction
▪ Separator Test
Introduction
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 283
Laboratory PVT Analysis Procedure
PVT ANALYSIS
Separator Test
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 284
PVT Analysis for Separator Samples
Separator
samples
No Quality check
satisfied?
Constant Composition Expansion
Yes
Viscosity Test
Recombination
Separator Test
No Yes
Adjust Psat Pb @ Treservoir
? Constant Volume Depletion
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 285
PVT Analysis for Bottom Hole Samples
Bottom
hole
samples
No Yes Compositional
Quality check
analysis
Differential Vaporisation
Viscosity Test
Separator Test
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 286
Laboratory PVT Analysis Report
PVT REPORT
• Popening • Separator gas • Pb or Pd • Oil density • GOR • Oil viscosity • Retrograde liquid
• Sample volume • Separator oil • Oil compressibility • Oil FVF • Separator FVF • Gas viscosity
• Pb @ Tsep • Bottom hole sample • Relative volume • Solution GOR • Gas composition
• Pb @ Tres • Gas FVF
• Gas gravity
• Z factor
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 287
Quality Check
c3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 288
Bubble Point Pressure Check
The bubble point pressure is the
intercept between two straight
lines representing P-V relationship
above and below the bubble point
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 289
Quiz - Quality Check
Two separator oil were collected from the test separator (p=125 psig,
T=90oF). The bubble point pressure determination was conducted at
separator temperature. Examine the quality of the samples.
Sample A Sample B
Pressure Pump Reading Pressure Pump Reading
(psig) (cc) (psig) (cc)
1500 248.0 745 245.6
1200 247.0 520 244.0
1000 245.0 290 242.0
800 243.0 200 241.1
600 240.0 170 240.6
400 237.0 160 237.0
200 232.0 155 233.0
150 228.0 150 230.0
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 290
Multi-Stage Pressure Experiments
: Standard
: Can be performed
N: Not recommended
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 291
Constant Composition & Differential Data
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 292
Constant Composition Expansion (CCE)
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 293
Quiz for CCE test
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 294
CCE Test for Oil
A known amount of reservoir fluid is
charged into the PVT cell.
PV RELATION TEST@ CCE TEST
The fluid volume is measured at or
above reservoir pressure and the mass P > Pb P = Pb P < Pb
GAS
is quantified by measuring the fluid OIL OIL
PISTON
OIL
PISTON
density at these conditions. PISTON
Oil density
ρ : Density at (p,T) Adjusted Vrel
ρsat : Density at saturation
pressure.
Isothermal compressibility
Y - Y function
[Link] - Adjusted relative volume below Pb
Yreg - Regressed Y = a + b*p
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 296
Quiz: Calculate co and Y Function
Pressure-volume relation of reservoir fluid
Relative Volume Isothermal
Pressure Y
(V/Vsat) compressibility
psig - psi-1 -
5000 0.9639
CCE DATA (RESERVOIR-FLUID) FOR GOOD OIL CO. WELL 4 OIL
4500 0.9702 SAMPLE
4100 0.9756
4000 0.977
Fluid: Good Oil
3500 0.9845 o
Reservoir temperature: 220 F
3000 0.9928
Initial Rsservoir Pressure: 4100 psig
2900 0.9946
2800 0.9964 Saturation (bubble-point) pressure: 2620 psig
2700 0.9984
2620 1
2605 1.0021
2591 1.0042
2516 1.0157
2401 1.0353
2253 1.0648
2090 1.1041
1897 1.1627
1698 1.2415
1477 1.3611
1292 1.5
1040 1.7839
830 2.1709
640 2.7603
472 3.6961
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 297
Adjusting Vrel data below Pb
Step 1: Calculate the Y-function for all pressure below the
saturation pressure.
Step 2: Plot Y-function versus pressure on a Cartesian
scale.
Step 3: Determine the coefficients a, b (Y = a + bp) of the
best straight fit of the data.
Step 4: Recalculate the relative volumes by the following
equation:
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 298
Exercise
Pressure Oil volume Gas volume
psig cc cc
8000 44.09 0
Determine the Pb
7500 44.39 0
Calculate the Vrel 7000 44.86 0
6800 45.07 0
Estimate the isothermal
6700 45.19 0
compressibility of oil co above 6600 42.82 2.51
6500 41.71 3.77
the bubble point pressure
5400 40.89 4.75
Calculate Y-Function and 6200 39.61 6.36
6000 38.56 7.81
adjust Vrel for data below
5800 37.68 9.10
bubble point pressure 5300 36.16 11.79
5000 35.52 13.31
4500 34.23 16.80
4000 33.55 19.80
3000 31.97 29.53
2000 31.29 46.12
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 299
CCE Test for Gas Condensate
To determine dew point pressure
Pd.
PV RELATION TEST@ CCE TEST
The pressure in the PVT cell is
P > Pd P = Pd P < Pd P << Pd
initially greater than the Pd.
Gas Gas Gas Gas
The volume of liquid drop out from PISTON PISTON Oil Oil
PISTON PISTON
pressure.
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 301
Differential Liberation Experiment (DLE)
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 302
Data Obtained from DV/DL Test
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 303
Differential Liberation Test at Reservoir
Temperature
Oil Formation Volume Factor at 200 F
1.600
decreases. Why?
1.200
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 304
Differential Liberation Test at Reservoir
Temperature
Oil Density at 200 F
0.850
0.840
0.830
Pb = 2450 psig 0.820
0.810
Oil Density,g/cc
0.800
Above Pb, the oil density 0.790
decreases. Why? 0.780
0.770
0.760
Below Pb, the oil density 0.750
0.740
increase. Why? 0.730
0.720
The reduction of mass is minimal 0.710
0.700
compare to oil volume decrease
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
Pressure, psig
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 305
Differential Liberation Test at Reservoir
Temperature
Why? 450
400
350
Below bubble point
300
pressure, Rs decreases as 250
pressure decreases. Why? 200
150
It will continue to vapourise 100
until no gas come out from 50
the oil at the atmospheric 0
pressure 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
Pressure, psig
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 306
Sample DL Data
DLE DATA FOR GOOD OIL CO. WELL 4 OIL SAMPLE
Relative Gas
Relative
Solution Oil Oil Z Gas Formation Oil
Pressure Temp Total
GOR (Rsd) Volume Density Factor Gravity Volume Viscosity
Volume (Btd)
(Bod) Factor
o
psig F scf/bbl RB/bbl RB/bbl g/cm3 - - cP
5000 220 0.45
4500 220 0.434
4000 220 0.418
3500 220 0.401
3000 220 0.385
2800 220 0.379
2620 220 1.6 1.6 0.6562 0.373
2350 220 763 1.554 1.665 0.6655 0.846 0.825 0.00685 0.396
2100 220 684 1.515 1.748 0.6731 0.851 0.818 0.00771 0.417
1850 220 612 1.479 1.859 0.6808 0.859 0,797 0.00882 0.442
1600 220 544 1.445 2.016 0.6889 0.872 0.791 0.01034 0.469
1350 220 479 1.412 2.244 0.6969 0.887 0.794 0.01245 0.502
1110 220 416 1.382 2.593 0.7044 0.903 0.809 0.01552 0.542
850 220 354 1.351 3.169 0.7121 0.922 0.831 0.02042 0.592
600 220 292 1.32 4.254 0.7198 0.941 0.881 0.02931 0.654
350 220 223 1.283 6.975 0.7291 0.965 0.988 0.05065 0.783
159 220 157 1.244 14.693 0.7382 0.984 1.213 0.10834 0.855
0 220 0 1.075 0.7892 2.039 1.286
0 60 1
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 307
Differential Liberation Test
DLE DATA FOR GOOD OIL CO. WELL 4 OIL SAMPLE
Relative Gas
Relative
Solution Oil Oil Z Gas Formation Oil
Pressure Temp Total
GOR (Rsd) Volume Density Factor Gravity Volume Viscosity
Volume (Btd)
(Bod) Factor
o
psig F scf/bbl RB/bbl RB/bbl g/cm3 - - cP
5000 220 Residual oil? 0.45
4500 220 0.434
4000 220 0.418
3500 220 0.401
3000 220 0.385
2800 220 0.379
2620 220 854 1.6 1.6 0.6562 0.373
2350 220 763 1.554 1.665 0.6655 0.846 0.825 0.00685 0.396
2100 220 684 1.515 1.748 0.6731 0.851 0.818 0.00771 0.417
1850 220 612 1.479 1.859 0.6808 0.859 0,797 0.00882 0.442
1600 220 544 1.445 2.016 0.6889 0.872 0.791 0.01034 0.469
1350 220 479 1.412 2.244 0.6969 0.887 0.794 0.01245 0.502
1110 220 416 1.382 2.593 0.7044 0.903 0.809 0.01552 0.542
850 220 354 1.351 3.169 0.7121 0.922 0.831 0.02042 0.592
600 220 292 1.32 4.254 0.7198 0.941 0.881 0.02931 0.654
350 220 223 1.283 6.975 0.7291 0.965 0.988 0.05065 0.783
159 220 157 1.244 14.693 0.7382 0.984 1.213 0.10834 0.855
0 220 0 1.075 0.7892 2.039 1.286
0 60 1
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 308
The Differential Liberation Test
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 309
The Differential Liberation Test
where:
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 310
The Differential Liberation Test
The gas formation volume factor :
Where:
= gas formation volume factor, ft3/scf
= temperature, °R
= cell pressure, psia
= standard temperature, °R
= standard pressure, psia
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 311
The Differential Liberation Test
The gas deviation -factor
Where:
= volume of the liberated gas in the PVT cell at
and
= volume of the removed gas
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 312
Quiz
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 313
Constant Volume Depletion (CVD)
CVD experiment is the most important PVT experiment
for gas condensate reservoirs.
Designed to provide volumetric and compositional data
for gas condensate and volatile oil reservoirs producing
by pressure depletion.
Extract reservoir engineering quantities:
• Recovery vs. reservoir pressure.
• Produced well stream composition (surface product)
vs. pressure.
• Average oil saturation in the reservoir during
depletion.
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 314
Constant Volume Depletion (CVD)
The experiment starts with a single
phase gas sample.
• Reservoir depletion
performance
Simulate • Compositional
variation
• Reservoir
Provide engineering
information calculations
7 steps
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 316
Step 1
P: dew-point
pressure
T: reservoir temp
Sample
fluid
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 317
Step 2
Sample
fluid
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 318
Step 3
Retrograde liquid
VL
retrograde liquid
saturation
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 319
Step 4
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 320
Step 5
Calculate
Composition Yi
Volume (Vgp)sc
Moles
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 321
Step 6
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 322
Step 7
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 323
Sample CVD Data
CVD DATA FOR GOOD OIL CO. WELL 7 GAS-CONDENSATE SAMPLE 2
Reservoir Pressure, psig
Component 5713 4000 3500 2900 2100 1300 605 0
CO2 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.21
N2 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.14
C1 61.72 61.72 63.1 65.21 69.79 70.77 66.59
C2 14.1 14.1 14.27 14.1 14.12 14.63 16.06
C3 8.37 8.37 8.26 8.1 7.57 7.73 9.11
i-C4 0.98 0.98 0.91 0.95 0.81 0.79 1.01
n-C4 3.45 3.45 3.4 3.16 2.71 2.59 3.31
i-C5 0.91 0.91 0.86 0.84 0.67 0.55 0.68
n-C5 1.52 1.52 1.4 1.39 0.97 0.81 1.02
C6 1.79 1.79 1.6 1.52 1.03 0.73 0.8
C7+ 6.85 6.85 5.9 4.41 2 1.06 1.07
Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
C7+ molecular weight 143 143 138 128 116 111 110
C7+ specific gravity 0.795 0.795 0.79 0.78 0.767 0.762 0.761
Equilibrium gas deviation factor, Z 1.107 0.867 0.799 0.748 0.762 0.819 0.902
Two-phase deviation factor, Z 1.107 0.867 0.802 0.744 0.704 0.671 0.576
Wellstream produced, cumulative
0 5.374 15.438 35.096 57.695 76.787 93.515
% of initial
From smooth compositions
C3+, gal/Mscf 9.218 9.218 8.476 7.174 5.171 4.49 5.307
C4+, gal/Mscf 6.922 6.922 6.224 4.98 3.095 2.37 2.808
C5+, gal/Mscf 5.519 5.519 4.876 3.692 1.978 1.294 1.437
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 324
Calculated recoveries from CVD results
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 325
Retrograde liquid volume
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 326
LIQUID SHRINKAGE DURING CCE/CVD
44%
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 327
Multi-stage Separation Test (Separator
Test)
The objective of this test is to
GOR and stock tank oil density.
temperature on oil shrinkage.
bIn cubic feet of gas at 60oF and 14.65 psia per barrel of oil at indicated pressure and temperature.
c
In cubic feet of gas at 60oF and 14.65 psia per barrel of stock-tank oil at 60oF.
d
In barrels of saturated oil at 2620 psig and 220oF per barrel of stock-tank oil at 60oF.
eIn barrels of oil at indicated pressure and temperature per barrel of stock-tank oil at 60oF.
3/28/2023 Dr. Mai Cao Lân, Faculty of Geology & Petroleum Engineering, HCMUT, Vietnam 329
Sample Separator Test
The test involves placing a hydrocarbon sample at its
saturation pressure and reservoir temperature in a
PVT cell.