Reviewer Prelims
Reviewer Prelims
Comparative politics
● Empirical answers are responses or conclusions derived from empirical evidence, which
is information obtained through observation, experimentation, or experience.
● Political science is considered a science because it studies politics in a systematic and
organized way, using facts and evidence to understand how governments, leaders, and
people behave. It relies on data, such as surveys, statistics, and real-world examples, to
test ideas and theories about political systems. Political scientists use clear methods, like
experiments, interviews, and analysis, to explain why political events happen and to
predict future trends.
● Comparative Politics is a subfield of political science that focuses on analyzing and
comparing political systems, institutions, processes, and behaviors across different
countries or regions. It seeks to understand how and why political systems differ and
what factors shape their development and outcomes.
A regime is a set of rules, institutions, and practices that define how a country or society is
governed. It includes the structure of power (like who makes decisions and how), the laws that
guide behavior, and the goals or values the government follows. Regimes can take many forms,
such as democracies (where people vote for leaders), authoritarian systems (where power is held
by a small group or one person), or monarchies (ruled by a king or queen).
A.Political Order
State formation is the process by which a state (a centralized political organization with a
government, laws, and control over a specific territory and population) is created and develops
over time. Examples of state formation include the creation of modern nations like France or the
United States, which developed over centuries through wars, treaties, and political reforms.
State collapse is the breakdown or failure of a state, where its government loses control and can
no longer function effectively. This happens when:
● Institutions Fail: Systems like law enforcement, courts, or tax collection stop working.
● Loss of Authority: The government can no longer enforce its rules or protect its people.
● Conflict: Wars, rebellions, or civil unrest weaken the state.
● Economic Crisis: Poverty, corruption, or lack of resources make it impossible to govern.
When a state collapses, it can lead to chaos, violence, or the rise of new groups trying to take
control. Examples include the collapse of Somalia in the 1990s or the fall of the Soviet Union in
1991.
War
Revolutions
A revolution is a sudden, dramatic, and often violent change in a society or government. It
happens when people rise up to overthrow an existing system (like a government, ruler, or social
order) and replace it with something new. Revolutions are usually driven by widespread
dissatisfaction with issues like inequality, oppression, or poor leadership.
Nationalism
Nationalism is a strong sense of loyalty, pride, and devotion to one's nation or country. It is the
belief that people who share a common identity—based on factors like culture, language, history,
or territory—should have their own independent state or govern themselves. Nationalism often
emphasizes the idea that a nation is unique and deserves to protect its interests and way of life.
B. Political Regimes
● Varieties of political regimes
Democracy: Power lies with the people, either directly or through elected representatives
(e.g., USA, India).
Authoritarianism: Power is concentrated in a single leader or small group, with limited
freedoms (e.g., North Korea).
Totalitarianism: Extreme control over all aspects of life by the state (e.g., Nazi Germany).
Monarchy: Rule by a king/queen, either absolute (e.g., Saudi Arabia) or constitutional
(e.g., UK).
Oligarchy: Power held by a small elite group, often based on wealth or family ties.
Theocracy: Religious leaders rule, and laws are based on religion (e.g., Iran).
Military Dictatorship: Rule by the military, often after a coup (e.g., Myanmar).
Hybrid Regimes: Mix of democratic and authoritarian traits (e.g., Russia).
Anarchy: No central government; stateless society.
Federalism: Power shared between central and regional governments (e.g., USA,
Germany).
Confederation: Loose union of independent states (e.g., EU to some extent).
Socialist/Communist: State controls economy and resources (e.g., China, Cuba)
● Democratization and democratic breakdowns
Demoratization-The process of transitioning from a non-democratic regime (e.g.,
authoritarianism, monarchy) to a democratic system. It involves establishing free
elections, the rule of law, civil liberties, and accountable institutions.
Democratic breakdown-The collapse or erosion of a democratic system, leading to a
return of authoritarianism or instability.
C. Social Actors
● Social Movements(Strikes, social capital, protests)
are organized, collective efforts by groups of people to bring about or resist social,
political, economic, or cultural change. They often arise when individuals share common
grievances and work together to challenge existing power structures or norms.
● Interests groups(Labor studies include business)
are organizations that aim to influence public policy and decision-making to benefit their
specific cause, members, or stakeholders. Unlike social movements, which are often
broad and grassroots-driven, interest groups are typically more structured and focused on
specific issues.
● Citizen attitudes and popular culture
● Religion
● Clientelism
it’s when someone with power gives things to people who have less power, but only if
they do something in return, like being loyal or helping them out.
Period of Evolution
2 Barrington Moore, Jr. The critical spirit and comparative historical analysis
Comparative Method
1. *Comparison as an Analytical Method*:
- Comparing things helps us understand why something happens.
- By looking at similarities and differences, we can find patterns or causes.
By Geographic Regions:
Siaroff emphasizes the importance of regional context in shaping political regimes.
For example:
● Latin America has a history of populism and military dictatorships.
● The Middle East is characterized by authoritarianism and sectarian conflict.
● Scandinavia is known for its social democratic welfare states.
By Political Systems:
● Liberal democracies: These regimes are characterized by free and fair elections, the rule
of law, and the protection of civil liberties. Examples include Canada, Germany, and
Japan.
● Hybrid regimes: These combine elements of democracy and authoritarianism, often with
limited political competition and restricted freedoms. Examples include Russia, Turkey,
and Venezuela.
● Authoritarian regimes: These concentrate power in the hands of a single leader or party,
often suppressing dissent and controlling the media. Examples include North Korea,
Saudi Arabia, and China.
Chapter 3
Chapter 3: Electoral Democracies, Liberal Democracies, and Autocracies
Democracy and the Demos
● Siaroff defines democracy as a political system where the people (demos) hold power
through mechanisms of participation and representation. The term “demos” refers to the
citizens who form the political community.
● Democracy is rooted in the principle of popular sovereignty, where authority is derived
from the consent of the governed.
● The chapter emphasizes that democracy is not just about elections but also about ensuring
inclusiveness, participation, and accountability in governance.
2. Elections and Accountability
● Elections are a cornerstone of democracy, serving as the primary mechanism for ensuring
government accountability. They allow citizens to choose their leaders and hold them
responsible for their actions.
● Siaroff distinguishes between:
● Free and fair elections: Inclusive, competitive, and transparent, with equal
opportunities for all candidates and parties.
● Sham elections: Used by authoritarian regimes to create the appearance of
legitimacy without genuine competition or accountability.
● He highlights the importance of electoral institutions, such as independent electoral
commissions and clear legal frameworks, to ensure the integrity of elections.
3. Electoral Democracy vs. Liberal Democracy
● Siaroff introduces two key types of democracy:
● Electoral Democracy: A minimalist form of democracy where elections are held
to choose leaders, but there may be limited protections for civil liberties and the
rule of law. Examples include hybrid regimes like Russia or Turkey.
● Liberal Democracy: A more comprehensive form of democracy that combines
free and fair elections with strong protections for civil liberties, the rule of law,
and institutional checks and balances. Examples include countries like Canada,
Germany, and Sweden.
● He argues that while electoral democracy is a necessary starting point, it is incomplete
without the broader institutional and legal framework of liberal democracy.
4. The Five Elements of Liberal Democracy
Siaroff outlines the five essential elements that define liberal democracy:
1. Free and Fair Elections: Competitive, inclusive, and transparent elections that allow
citizens to choose their leaders.
2. Civil Liberties: Protection of fundamental rights such as freedom of speech, assembly,
religion, and the press, enabling citizens to express themselves and hold the government
accountable.
3. Rule of Law: Equality before the law, an independent judiciary, and legal protections
against arbitrary power.
4. Checks and Balances: Separation of powers among the executive, legislative, and judicial
branches to prevent the concentration of power.
5. Accountability: Mechanisms to ensure that leaders are answerable to the people and that
government actions are transparent and subject to scrutiny.
5. Political Regimes in the World Today
● Siaroff provides a global overview of political regimes, categorizing them based on their
level of democracy:
● Liberal Democracies: Countries that meet all five elements of liberal democracy.
Examples include the United States, Japan, and most of Western Europe.
● Electoral Democracies: Countries that hold elections but fall short in areas like
civil liberties or the rule of law. Examples include India, Brazil, and South Africa.
● Hybrid Regimes: Countries that combine elements of democracy and
authoritarianism. Elections may be held, but they are often manipulated, and civil
liberties are restricted. Examples include Russia, Turkey, and Venezuela.
● Authoritarian Regimes: Countries where power is concentrated in the hands of a
single leader or party, elections are nonexistent or sham, and civil liberties are
severely curtailed. Examples include North Korea, China, and Saudi Arabia.
● He discusses the challenges to democracy, such as populism, corruption, and the erosion
of democratic norms, which threaten the stability and quality of democratic regimes.
6. Beyond Liberal Democracy
● Siaroff explores alternative forms of democracy beyond the liberal model, such as:
● Participatory Democracy: Emphasizes direct citizen involvement in
decision-making, often through mechanisms like referendums and grassroots
movements.
● Deliberative Democracy: Focuses on inclusive and reasoned public deliberation to
reach consensus on policy decisions.
● Social Democracy: Combines democratic governance with a strong welfare state
and policies aimed at reducing inequality.
● He notes that these models highlight the diversity of democratic practices and the
potential for innovation in governance.
7. The Copenhagen Document
● Siaroff discusses the Copenhagen Document (1990), a landmark agreement by the
Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) that established
international standards for democracy and human rights.
● Key principles outlined in the document include:
● Free and fair elections.
● The rule of law and an independent judiciary.
● Protection of civil liberties and human rights.
● Political pluralism and the right to form political parties.
● The Copenhagen Document serves as a benchmark for evaluating the quality of
democracy in countries around the world.
Chapter 7
Chapter 7: Electoral Systems and Party Systems in Democracies
1. Electoral Systems
Definition and Importance:
● An electoral system is a set of rules that govern how votes are cast, counted, and
translated into seats in a representative body. It plays a crucial role in shaping the political
landscape, influencing voter behavior, party strategies, and governance outcomes.
Types of Electoral Systems:
1. Majoritarian Systems:
● First-Past-the-Post (FPTP): The candidate with the most votes in a constituency
wins. Used in countries like the United States and the United Kingdom.
● Two-Round System (TRS): If no candidate receives a majority in the first round, a
second round is held between the top candidates. Used in France and Brazil.
● Single Non-Transferable Vote (SNTV): Voters cast a single vote in multi-member
districts, and the candidates with the most votes win. Used in some local elections
and historically in Japan.
2. Proportional Representation (PR) Systems:
● List PR: Voters vote for a party list, and seats are allocated proportionally based
on the total votes received by each party. Used in countries like Sweden and
Israel.
● Mixed-Member Proportional (MMP): Combines FPTP and list PR, ensuring
proportional outcomes. Used in Germany and New Zealand.
3. Mixed Systems:
● Parallel Systems: Combines FPTP and PR, but the PR seats do not compensate for
disproportionality in the FPTP seats. Used in Japan and Russia.
● Additional Member System (AMS): A type of MMP that explicitly balances
proportionality. Used in Germany.
Effects of Electoral Systems:
● Representation: PR systems tend to produce more proportional outcomes, while
majoritarian systems often favor larger parties.
● Party System: PR systems encourage multi-party systems, while majoritarian systems
tend to produce two-party systems.
● Voter Behavior: Electoral systems influence voter turnout, strategic voting, and the
salience of issues.
2. Party Systems
Definition and Importance:
● A party system refers to the configuration of political parties in a country, including their
number, size, and interactions. It is shaped by historical, social, and institutional factors,
particularly the electoral system.
Types of Party Systems:
1. Two-Party Systems: Dominated by two major parties, often in majoritarian systems.
Examples include the United States and the United Kingdom.
2. Multi-Party Systems: Characterized by multiple parties, often in PR systems. Examples
include Germany, Sweden, and India.
3. Dominant-Party Systems: One party consistently wins elections, even in competitive
systems. Examples include South Africa (African National Congress) and Japan (Liberal
Democratic Party historically).
4. One-Party Systems: Only one party is legally allowed to exist. Found in authoritarian
regimes like China and North Korea.
Functions of Political Parties:
● Representation: Articulating and representing the interests of various social groups.
● Governance: Forming governments and implementing policies.
● Integration: Mobilizing citizens and fostering political participation.
● Accountability: Holding the government responsible for its actions.
2. Totalitarianism
Totalitarianism represents the most extreme and intrusive form of autocracy. Siaroff defines it as
a regime that seeks total control over all aspects of public and private life, often through an
ideology that justifies its actions.
Characteristics of Totalitarianism
● Ideology: A comprehensive and often dogmatic ideology (e.g., communism, fascism) that
justifies the regime’s actions and mobilizes the population.
● Single-Party Rule: A single political party dominates all aspects of governance, and
opposition is systematically eliminated.
● State Control: The state controls the economy, media, education, and even private life,
leaving no room for independent institutions or civil society.
● Repression: Extensive use of secret police, surveillance, and terror to suppress dissent
and maintain control.
● Mobilization: The regime actively mobilizes the population through propaganda, mass
rallies, and participation in state-sponsored organizations.
Examples
● Nazi Germany (1933-1945): Adolf Hitler’s regime, characterized by fascist ideology,
extreme nationalism, and the use of terror.
● Soviet Union under Stalin (1924-1953): A communist regime that sought total control
over society and the economy.
4. Sultanistic Regimes
Sultanistic regimes are a subtype of autocracy characterized by personalistic rule, where power is
concentrated in the hands of a single leader who treats the state as his personal property.
Characteristics of Sultanistic Regimes
● Personal Rule: The leader’s authority is absolute, and institutions are subordinate to his
will.
● Patronage: The leader uses patronage networks to reward loyalty and maintain control.
● Lack of Ideology: Unlike totalitarian regimes, sultanistic regimes lack a coherent
ideology and focus on the leader’s personal interests.
● Weak Institutions: State institutions are weak and personalized, serving the leader’s
whims rather than functioning as independent entities.
Examples
● Nicaragua under Somoza (1936-1979): The Somoza family ruled Nicaragua as a personal
fiefdom, using state resources for their enrichment.
● Philippines under Marcos (1965-1986): Ferdinand Marcos centralized power and
amassed personal wealth while suppressing opposition.
5. Authoritarian Regimes
Authoritarian regimes are the most common form of autocracy, characterized by limited political
pluralism and the absence of meaningful competition. Unlike totalitarian regimes, they do not
seek total control over society.
Characteristics of Authoritarian Regimes
● Limited Pluralism: A small elite or ruling party controls power, but some degree of
political or social pluralism may exist.
● Repression: The regime uses coercion to suppress dissent but does not employ
widespread terror or ideological mobilization.
● Institutionalization: Authoritarian regimes often rely on institutions like the military,
bureaucracy, or a dominant party to maintain control.
● Pragmatism: The regime focuses on maintaining power and stability rather than pursuing
an ideology or transforming society.
Types of Authoritarian Regimes
1. Military Regimes: The military directly controls the government, often after a coup.
Examples include Myanmar (under the junta) and Egypt (under Sisi).
2. One-Party Regimes: A single party dominates the political system, allowing limited
competition within the party or controlled elections. Examples include China and North
Korea.
3. Personalist Regimes: Power is concentrated in the hands of an individual leader, with
institutions serving the leader’s interests. Examples include Venezuela under Chávez and
Russia under Putin
● Definition:
○ CP is a subfield of Political Science (PS) that focuses on comparing political
systems, institutions, processes, and behaviors within and across countries.
○ It involves the systematic study of political phenomena to understand similarities
and differences between political systems.
● Purpose:
○ To analyze and explain political phenomena.
○ To predict political outcomes and behaviors.
○ To understand the linkages between domestic and international politics.
● Scope:
○ CP studies internal political structures (e.g., parliaments, executives), actors (e.g.,
voters, political parties, interest groups), and processes (e.g., policy-making,
political culture) within states.
● Linkages:
○ It explores the connections between domestic and international politics.
○ It examines the relationship between politics and other fields like economics,
culture, technology, and public health.
● Critical Thinking:
○ CP sharpens analytical skills and helps us form informed political opinions.
○ It encourages scientific logic and coherent argumentation in understanding
political phenomena.
● 19th Century:
○ CP emerged as an academic discipline, focusing on formal institutions of
government.
● 20th Century:
○ Shifted from descriptive to more analytical and scientific approaches.
○ Influenced by behaviorism (focus on political behavior) and institutionalism
(focus on political institutions).
● Post-Modern Era:
○ Incorporation of historical, economic, and cultural approaches.
○ Influenced by events like decolonization and the transition to democracy.
Comparative Method
1. Classification:
○ Simplifies descriptions by categorizing political systems (e.g., monarchy,
democracy).
○ Aristotle’s classification of governments:
■ Good Forms: Monarchy, Aristocracy, Polity.
■ Corrupt Forms: Tyranny, Oligarchy, Democracy.
2. Hypothesis-Testing:
○ Seeks to explain political phenomena by testing theories against empirical
evidence.
○ Helps build more complete theories of politics.
3. Prediction:
○ Uses hypothesis-testing to make probabilistic predictions about political outcomes
in different countries.
● Focus:
○ Contemporary CP focuses on variables that explain political behavior and
outcomes.
○ It uses cross-national comparisons to test theories and identify significant
associations.
● Aim:
○ To understand the complexity of power, influence, and authority in modern
political systems.
○ To conceptualize, measure, and understand the relationships of power in a
globalized world.
Conclusion
● Comparative Politics is a vital field within Political Science that helps us understand,
compare, and predict political systems and behaviors across different countries.
● It combines historical, institutional, and behavioral approaches to provide a
comprehensive understanding of politics.
● By studying CP, we can become more informed citizens and develop a sophisticated
understanding of the political world.
Public Administration
Module 1
Introduction to Public Administration
What is Public Administration?
● is the organization and management of men and materials to achieve the purposes of the
government (Waldo, 1955)
● is the action on the part of government, the means by which the purposes and goals of the
government are realized (Rossenbloom, 1989)
● the art and science of management as applied to the affairs of the state (Waldo, 2155)
● is a cooperative group effort in the public setting – covers all three branches of the
government and their inter-relationships (F. Nigro & L. Nigro, 2000)
● Involvement of resources not only monetary but also other forms of resources such as
manpower and more
● Centered the resources on the respective goals of the administration example is the
prioritization of infrastructure of the duterte administration the same with the current
goals administration.
Use of Public Administration
Public Administration is both a professional and scholarly discipline.
As a Field of Practice: - Consist of activities and processes of administering public affairs and carrying
out governmental functions
As a Field of Study or Discipline: - A systematic study and improvement of government capacity and
practice in forming policies, making decisions, implementing and securing the desired result
Managerial View - Perceives public administration as a field which limits itself to managerial
activities disregarding the technical and clerical functions that form part of the discipline
● It sees public administration as just the management part—making decisions, leading,
and organizing. It ignores the smaller tasks like typing or technical work, treating them as
separate.
Actions are based on public trust Not necessarily based on public trust
Emergence of Administration
● Public administration emerged during the development of early civilizations
● As a field of study, it can be traced back to either Europe or United States
● Separation of Public Administration from Political Science
● Creation of Public Administration as a [separate] discipline
● Wilson, in his paper “The Study of Public Administration” noted that administration is
obvious part of the government – it is government in action”
● Politics-Administration Dichotomy
The field of public administration in the Philippines is viewed as a concept that is both a field of
study and a field of practice.
● As a study, it has evolved into the present set-up of the discipline in the NCPAG and
other universities that offer the discipline as one of the best courses to learn the
government; it has it’s own theories and principles; and it has its areas of specialization
● As a practice, it is a reflection of the processes and activities of the different government
offices in the Philippines, emphasizing the processes in the Philippine bureaucracy
● Devoid of “politics-administration dichotomy” (Brillantes and Fernandez, 2008) There is
a closely knit connection between politics and administration.
Administration Management
Henry Fayol’s principles focus on organizing and managing organizations effectively. Here’s a
simplified explanation:
1. Division of Labor: Work is divided among employees to improve efficiency.
2. Authority: Supervisors have the right to give orders and expect them to be followed.
3. Discipline: Employees must follow the organization’s rules and policies.
4. Unity of Command: Each employee should report to only one supervisor to avoid
confusion.
5. Unity of Direction: Teams with the same goal should be led by one supervisor.
6. Subordination of Individual Interest: The organization’s goals come before personal
interests.
7. Remuneration: Employees should be paid fairly for their work.
8. Centralization: Major decisions are made by top management, but some authority can
be delegated.
9. Scalar Chain: There’s a clear line of authority from top to bottom, shown in the
organizational chart.
10.Order: Employees should be assigned to roles that match their skills.
11.Equity: Employees should be treated fairly and given what they need to succeed.
12.Stability of Tenure: Keeping employees long-term ensures continuity and efficiency.
13.Initiative: Employees should be encouraged to come up with ideas and take action.
14.Esprit de Corps: Promoting teamwork and unity boosts morale and productivity
BUREAUCRATIC MODEL - Derived from the construct of ideal bureaucracy of Max Weber -
According to Weber, bureaucracy is the most efficient form of organization for administrative
purposes - Three main characteristics of ideal bureaucracy:
1. Hierarchy
2. Division of labor
3. Formally written rules and procedures
4. Impersonality
5. Neutrality
Neoclassical Theory
● Commonly referred to as the “human relations” or “human behavior school” which
focuses more on humanistic perspective
● Organizations is seen as a social system of interpersonal relationship
● It focused on the people and dynamics of human behavior in the organization
● It was believed that social and psychological incentives were more important than
economic considerations
INDUSTRIAL HUMANISM
- The socio-psychological being of workers affects their performance at work
- Human nees and motivation should be taken into consideration in the overall appreciation of
the organization
- Application of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs
- Theory X and Theory Y
- Employees behave in the manner that their supervisors expect them to be
- Theory X managers have negative presumption about their employees; while Theory Y
managers regard their employees in a more positive light
CONTINGENCY APPROACH
- No single technique or approach is applicable to all situations, hence, administrators or
managers have to identify the best solution or strategy that is most suitable in a given situation
- Administrators and managers shall have the understanding of different factors and aspects
affecting the organization.
Module 2
Definition
LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT
A political subdivision of a nation or a state constituted by law which has substantial control over
local affairs, including the power to impose taxes, the governing body of which is elected and
appointed.
Any sub-national government which is comprised of provinces, cities, municipalities, and
barangays that provide some of the basic services.
Decentralization
Decentralization is the transfer of power, authority, and responsibility from the central institution
to the lower or local levels of a government system.
IMPERATIVES OF DECENTRALIZATION
1. Leadership
2. Structure
3. Resources
4. Personnel
FORMS OF DECENTRALIZATION
Devolution (Political Decentralization)
Transfer of powers and responsibilities to LGUs.
Privatization
Assumption of a private entity of a service or function of the government.
Decentralization
In its broad or general sense, decentralization has two forms in the Philippine setting, namely:
the decentralization of power and the decentralization of administration.
Decentralization of Power:
1. This is when the central government gives political power to local government units
(LGUs) so they can make their own decisions and plan their future with little interference
from the central government. This means LGUs become independent and are accountable
to their local people, not to the central government. It’s like giving them the freedom to
lead themselves.
Decentralization of Administration:
2. This is when the central government gives LGUs the authority to manage certain tasks or
responsibilities. This helps LGUs grow stronger, more capable, and more responsive to
their communities, making them better partners in achieving national goals. It also allows
the central government to focus on bigger, nationwide issues instead of handling local
matters.
Local Autonomy
Article X, Section 2 of the 1987 Constitution specifically grants local autonomy to "territorial
and political subdivisions." The constitutional mandate to ensure local autonomy refers to
decentralization. The grant of local autonomy is Constitutionally mandated and allows local
government units to make independent administrative determinations subject only to the
Executive branch's general supervision. Thus, any regulations imposed on the exercise of local
autonomy should not, in any way, amount to control.
Local autonomy should give local government units sufficient discretion to act on matters of
local importance, without undue interference from central government agencies. This is intrinsic
in the Constitution's qualification that executive interference is limited to general supervision, as
opposed to control, over local government units.
Barangays
Section 384. Role of the Barangay. - As the basic political unit, the barangay serves as the
primary planning and implementing unit of government policies, plans, programs, projects, and
activities in the community, and as a forum wherein the collective views of the people may be
expressed, crystallized and considered, and where disputes may be amicably settled.
Municipalities
Section 440. Role of the Municipality. - The municipality, consisting of a group of barangays,
serves primarily as a general purpose government for the coordination and delivery of basic,
regular and direct services and effective governance of the inhabitants within its territorial
jurisdiction.
Cities
Section 448. Role of the City. - The city, consisting of more urbanized and developed barangays,
serves as a general purpose government for the coordination and delivery of basic, regular, and
direct services and effective governance of the inhabitants within its territorial jurisdiction.
Provinces
Section 459. Role of the Province. - The province, composed of a cluster of municipalities, or
municipalities and component cities, and as a political and corporate unit of government, serves
as a dynamic mechanism for developmental processes and effective governance of local
government units within its territorial jurisdiction.
Requisites:
1. Must not contravene the Constitution and other statutes;
2. Must not be unfair or oppressive
3. Must not be partial or discriminatory
4. Must not prohibit but may regulate trade
5. Must be general and consistent with public policy
6. Must not be unreasonable
1. Effectual changes in their fiscal status, particularly in the distribution of the Internal
Revenue Allotment (IRA) vis-a-vis their devolved functions; and
2. Political payoffs in the local government.
Abolition of LGUs
Section 9. Abolition of Local Government Units. - A local government unit may be abolished
when its income, population, or land area has been irreversibly reduced to less than the minimum
standards prescribed for its creation under Book III of this Code, as certified by the national
agencies mentioned in Section 7 hereof to Congress or to the sangguniang concerned, as the case
may be. The law or ordinance abolishing a local government unit shall specify the province, city,
municipality, or barangay with which the local government unit sought to be abolished will be
incorporated or merged.
Intergovernmental Relations
The National Government & LGUs
Municipal governments are just agents of NG. Local Councils exercise only delegated legislative
powers conferred to them by Congress, hence, the delegate (LGUs) cannot be superior or
exercise higher powers than the principal (NG).
Executive – The LCE of Mother LGU reviews the Executive Orders (EOs) of LCE of
Component LGU
The LCE of Mother LGU shall ensure that executive orders promulgated by the component LGU
are within the powers granted by law and in conformity within provincial, city or municipal
ordinances. Copies of such orders shall be forwarded to the LCE of Mother LGU within three (3)
days from their issuance. If the LCE of Mother LGU fails to act on said executive orders within
30 days after their submission, the same shall be deemed consistent with law and therefore valid.
Within 3 days after approval - Submission of local development plans and public investment
programs to Sangguniang Panlalawigan (SP).
Within 30 days after receipt of the Sanggunian of Mother LGU – documents shall be examined
or referred to the provincial attorney or prosecutor for examination. The provincial
attorney/prosecutor within 10 days from receipt of the documents, inform the SP in writing of
his/her comments and recommendations, which may be considered by the SP in making its
decision. If the SP finds that such ordinance/resolution is beyond the power of the conferred
upon the Sangguniang Bayan/Panlungsod, it shall declare the same invalid, in whole or in part
and advise the corresponding city/municipal authorities of the action it has taken. If no action has
been taken within 30 days after submission, the same shall be deemed consistent with law and
therefore valid.
LOCAL LEGISLATION
Section 48. Local Legislative Power. - Local legislative power shall be exercised by the
sangguniang panlalawigan for the province; the sangguniang panlungsod for the city; the
sangguniang bayan for the municipality; and the sangguniang barangay for the barangay.
Section 35. Linkages with People's and Non-governmental Organizations. - Local government
units may enter into joint ventures and such other cooperative arrangements with people's and
non-governmental organizations to engage in the delivery of certain basic services,
capability-building and livelihood projects, and to develop local enterprises designed to improve
productivity and income, diversify agriculture, spur rural industrialization, promote ecological
balance, and enhance the economic and social well-being of the people.
Section 36. Assistance to People's and Non-governmental Organizations. - A local government
unit may, through its local chief executive and with the concurrence of the sanggunian
concerned, provide assistance, financial or otherwise, to such people's and non-governmental
organizations for economic, socially-oriented, environmental, or cultural projects to be
implemented within its territorial jurisdiction.
Contemporary World
Module 1
Immanuel Wallerstein's World-System Theory:
● Developed in response to the limitations of modernization theory.
● Focuses on the asymmetrical trade relationships between rich (core) and poor
(peripheral) countries.
● Divides the world into three regions: Core (developed, powerful regions),
Periphery (subordinated regions), and Semi-Periphery (regions in transition
between core and periphery).
Manuel Castells' Network Society:
● Describes a society structured around networks powered by information and
communication technologies.
● The new economy is informational, global, and networked.
● The Internet creates a global symbolic environment, leading to a "digital divide"
between those connected to and those marginalized from this technological
system.
Anthony Giddens' Global Risk Society:
● Argues that globalization has led to a "global risk society" where human activities
produce various risks (e.g., pollution, market crashes).
● Societies are increasingly responsible for managing these risks.
Theories of Global Culture:
● Homogenization: Globalization leads to cultural convergence (e.g., world
1cuisines, uniform consumption patterns).
● Hybridization: Mixing of cultural forms to create something new (e.g., Burundi
drummers in New Zealand).
● Heterogeneity: Continued cultural differences and resistance to homogenization.
Marshall McLuhan's Global Village:
● Coined the term "global village" to describe how media integrates the planet,
allowing real-time global experiences.
● "The medium is the message" emphasizes the impact of the medium itself, not
just the content it carries.
George Ritzer's McDonaldization:
● Describes the spread of fast-food principles (efficiency, calculability, predictability,
control) to various sectors of society globally.
● Roland Robertson's Glocalization:
● The global is manifested in the local, allowing organizations to meet local needs while
operating globally.
● Examples include Coca-Cola in the Philippines and McDonald's local menu items in
different countries.
Arjun Appadurai's Landscapes of Cultural Flows:
● Identifies five dimensions of cultural flows: Mediascapes (image and communication),
Ethnoscapes (movement of people), Ideoscapes (exchange of ideas), Technoscapes (flows
of technology), and Financescapes (movement of money and capital).
What is Globalization?
Globalization means the world is becoming more connected. People, countries, and economies
are increasingly linked through trade, communication, and travel. According to Roland
Robertson, globalization makes the world feel smaller and makes people more aware of global
issues. David Held adds that globalization changes how people and countries interact, creating
networks of activity and power across the world. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines
it as the increased flow of goods, services, money, people, and ideas across borders, supported by
changes in policies and institutions.
Key Concepts:
1. Hyperglobalists (Optimists): Believe globalization is creating a single global culture and
economy, leading to prosperity and democracy.
2. Sceptics: Argue that the world is not truly globalizing but instead becoming more
regionalized, with countries focusing on their own regions.
3. Transformationalists: See globalization as a complex process that blends global and local
influences, without clear predictions for the future.
Waves of Globalization:
Forms of Globalization:
The presentation ends with a metaphor: "The global scholars and the elephant." It suggests that
different people see globalization in different ways, like blind men touching different parts of an
elephant. Each perspective is partly right, but no one sees the whole picture. Globalization is
complex, and understanding it requires looking at it from many angles.
Module 2
What is Global Governance?
Global governance refers to the ways countries, organizations, and individuals work together to
solve global problems that no single country can handle alone. It’s not about having a "world
government" but about cooperation through institutions, rules, and agreements. Examples
include addressing climate change, terrorism, and global health issues.
ASF 4
Pentecost
● As promised by Christ, the Holy Spirit descended on his Apostles after his ascension into
heaven.
● The Holy Spirit builds, animates, and sanctifies the mystical body, the Church.
● As the Spirit descended on the Apostles, they went out from hiding and began to
undertake the evangelizing mission Christ left them with – so was the Church birthed on
Pentecost Sunday.
● At the coming of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost, the Apostles were transformed from being
fearful disciples into courageous preachers of the good news.
● The Holy Spirit empowered the Apostles to carry out their mission of
EVANGELIZATION.
● EVANGELIZATION: The initial proclamation of the Gospel to non-believers for the
purpose of converting them to faith in the Lord Jesus.
● In the Acts of the Apostles, we see the Church grow under the guidance of the Holy
Spirit.
● What begins with a group of frightened disciples in an upper room ends with a Church
spanning the Roman Empire. Chapters 1–12 focus on Saint Peter’s leadership in
Jerusalem and nearby communities. Chapters 13–28 focus on the missionary work of
Saint Paul and his companions.
●
The Early Church
The early Church faced a significant question: To be or not to be Jewish. This was a central
issue as the Church began to grow and include both Jewish and Gentile converts. The Jewish
roots of Christianity were undeniable, as Jesus and his Apostles were Jewish, and the first
Christians were Jews who believed Jesus was the Messiah. However, as the Gospel spread
beyond Jewish communities, the Church had to grapple with whether Gentile converts needed to
adhere to Jewish laws and customs, such as circumcision and dietary restrictions.
Saint Paul
● Paul traveled over 10,000 miles proclaiming the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
● His journeys on land and sea took him through present-day Israel, Syria, Turkey, and
Greece.
● Saint Paul lived during the early to middle first century AD.
● He was born into a Jewish community.
● He was a Roman citizen.
● He studied under Rabbi Gamaliel and became a Pharisee.
● He spent the first part of his life persecuting Christians, and he witnessed the martyrdom
of Saint Stephen.
The Conversion of Saint Paul
● Saint Paul encountered the risen Christ on the road to Damascus, in Syria.
● The story of his conversion is found in Acts, chapter 9.
● His conversion led him to become a true Apostle.
● He established many Christian communities in major Roman cities.
● To remain in contact with these communities, he wrote letters offering advice,
encouragement, and teaching.
● These letters are part of his great contribution to our understanding of the Christian faith.
Paul’s First Journey
● In response to a call of the Holy Spirit, the Church in Antioch chose Barnabas and Paul to
proclaim the Gospel.
● They first traveled to Cyprus, then to Antioch in Pisidia, a city in present-day
west-central Turkey.
● When they stopped in each city, they went to the synagogues to preach the coming of
Jesus Christ, the Messiah, as the fulfillment of the promises made in the Old Testament.
Paul’s Second Journey
● Barnabas and Paul separated over a disagreement.
● Paul had a dream calling him to bring the Gospel to Macedonia.
● Paul attempted to proclaim the Gospel in Athens, where he was met with polite
indifference.
● He then went to Corinth, where he established a Church that would give him both great
joy and pain.
First Nero A.D. 67 - Blamed Christians for the Increased devotion and
Great Fire of Rome. commitment among
Christians.
- Christians sewn into
animal skins and thrown to
dogs.
- Executed Christians.