E-Govt Detail For Students
E-Govt Detail For Students
Spring 11-12-2019
Das, Santanu, "Marching towards Digital India: An Overview on the E-governance Initiatives taken by the
Central Government of India to Minimize the Digital Divide During the Period 1998-2018" (2019). Library
Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 3640.
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/3640
Marching towards Digital India: An overview on the e-governance
initiatives taken by the Central Government of India to minimize the
Digital Divide during the period 1998-2018
Santanu Das
Librarian, Surya Sen Mahavidyalaya, Siliguri, West Bengal, India
Corresponding Author: e-mail: [email protected], Ph. No: +91-9832683777
ABSTRACT
E-government refers to the delivery of national or local government information and services
via the Internet or other digital means to citizens or businesses or other governmental
agencies. E-government is a one-stop Internet gateway to major government services. E-
government facilitates the provision of relevant government information in the electronic
form to the citizens in a timely manner; better service delivery to citizens; empowerment of
the people through access to information without the bureaucracy and participation in public
policy decision-making. Proper implementation of e-governance can alleviate the gap
between digital have and digital have not. Through this paper, an effort has been made to
showcase the role of e-governance in bridging the digital divide in India. An account of the
initiative taken by Central of India since the first NDA government came to the power, have
been outlined.
Keywords: Digital Divide, E-governance, UPA, NDA, Digital India, NeGP, Digital
competency
1. Introduction
In 1970, Phillip J. Tichenor, George A. Donohue and Clarice N. Olien proposed the
“knowledge gap hypothesis” (Tichenor, Donohue, & Olien, 1970) which suggests that each
new medium of information increases the gap between the informed class and the uninformed
class in the society. There are certain close similarities between the digital divide and
previous conceptualizations of the knowledge gap hypothesis. Apart from that researchers
also tried to define digital divide from different perspectives. Among them some of the
definitions are as follows:
From the above definitions, world can be divided into two sets of people who have
and who do not have access to ICT or ability to use technologies, Internet, and other modern
artefacts, such as telephone, television. Such differences are more prominent among rural and
urban population, poor and rich people, and among developing and developed countries
across the globe. Besides, digital divide exists based on race, gender, geography, economic
status and physical ability; in skills, knowledge and ability to use information and other
technologies. In broader sense, the digital divide exists in global, regional, national, and state
level.
In any developing country such as India, the development of the society has been
restrained due to plenty of issues. The Government of India have been trying hard to provide
fundamental needs such as food, shelter, clothing, education which are top priority issues of
the destitute society. The other social problems like unemployment, population explosion,
poor communication, and natural calamities have worsened the situation. Before the initiation
of National e-Governance Plan (NeGP) in 2006, Digital divide has really never got a top
priority in any government agenda. In general, it is noticed that where people have not been
able to get computer literacy, internet access and higher education is leading to the disparity
in information access. Report of Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) (2017) &
Internet World Stats (2017) clearly indicates following are the major reasons for digital
divide in India:
According a study by British risk analysis firm Verisk Maplecroft (2014), among the
BRICs nations, India is the only country to be marked as ‘extreme risk’, meaning that the
country’s population suffers from a severe lack of digital inclusion. This indicates that in
India digital divide is at a higher level. The distribution of ICT use in these nations and other
developing countries is cause for concern. For example, the wealthier, more affluent segment
of the population, primarily based in urban areas, has embraced the use of modern web and
communications technology. The growth of the middle classes in the country, which now sits
at around 30% of the population, has driven demand for consumer goods, including ICTs.
The vast majority of the population has, however, been excluded from this process. Most
cannot afford ICTs (only 3% of households own PCs), lack the education required to use it
effectively (India has secondary school enrolment rates of 55% and adult literacy rates of just
under 63%) and are located in geographical areas that have little or no connectivity to ICT
services.
4. What is E-governance?
In the early 1990s, two changes swept across the world – the focus on good
governance with increasing non government participation in delivery of public services and
Information Communication Technologies (ICTs) and internet – technologies that potentially
could connect any and everyone in real time. The concept of e-Government or e-Governance
was born through the amalgamation of these two. E-Governance marked a paradigm shift in
the philosophy of governance – citizen centricity instead of process centricity and large scale
public participation through ICTs enablement (Palvia & Sharma, 2007). Dasgupta (2013)
defined it as “Electronic Governance is the application of Information and Communication
Technologies (ICTs) for delivering government services through integration of various stand-
alone systems between Government-to-Citizens (G2C), Government-to-Business (G2B), and
Government-to-Government (G2G) services. It is often linked with back office processes and
interactions within the entire government framework. Through e-Governance, the
government services are made available to the citizens in a convenient, efficient, and
transparent manner”. Through proper implementation of e-governance a variety of service
can be provided such as improved delivery of government services to citizens, improved
interactions with business and industry, citizen empowerment through access to information
etc. The resulting benefits can be minimized corruption, increased transparency, greater
convenience, revenue growth and cost reductions.
In India, now-a-days e-governance has been emerged as the burning topic. Central
government and most of the state governments have already taken or are taking initiatives
offering government services online. However, for the true potential of e-government to be
realized, government needs to restructure and transform its long entrenched business
processes. According to Dwidedi & Bharti (2010), e-government involves the use of ICTs to
support government operations and provide government services. However, e-government
goes even further and aims to fundamentally transform the production processes in which
public services are generated and delivered, thereby transforming the entire range of
relationships of public bodies with citizens, businesses and other governments (Haque, 2002).
Most of the discussions from the Tunis Summit of World Summit on the Information
Society (WSIS) in 2005 showcased that the Internet is rapidly transforming our society. ICT,
the computer, and the associated networks play an increasingly important role in the process
of learning and in people's careers. Accordingly, the existing digital divide has a negative
impact on people living in less developed regions, as well as those in the lower socio-
economic strata. The only stakeholders who can provide equal opportunities are the
Governments, so they should assume a leading role in e-governance as a key instrument in
closing the divide. The application of e-governance helps to reduce costs, inefficiency,
inconvenience and ineffectiveness in service delivery. Though e-governance is gaining
importance to a great extent in the recent years, due to many reasons like delays and changes
in functionaries, shortages in money, lack of motivation, lack of coordination between
departments of government, projects tying to election cycles and so on, many of the Indian
government projects are not being successful to the expected level. In India, involvement and
integration of people in crucial decision making for the enhancement of socioeconomic
development has been easier than ever with the help of e-governance.
Since the last couple of decades, there have been several initiatives taken by
government as well as private bodies to bridge digital divide in India. However, in view of
huge digital divide thoroughly penetrated in Indian societies, the volume of such initiatives
may not have brought the desired results till date; bur process has definitely been started in
India. To boost up these activities, some policies have been changed as well. In recent years,
Indian government have taken active steps and modified policies such as open data
initiatives, digital library developments, digitization of old government records. Further to
this, many of the government processes, transactions have gone online. Moreover, e-
commerce have been regularized and cyber act has been passed which helps both government
and private bodies to put lots of Indian contents and processes online which is a positive step
towards bridging digital divide. Here we have discussed the journey of India’s e-governance
strategies taken by Central Government to bridge the digital divide.
In a true sense, the journey of e-governance in India started after the National
Democratic Alliance (NDA) government came to power at the Centre in 1998. Several
positive measures were taken by the Central Government to make ICT as a driving force and
to transform India into a Knowledge Society. One of these initiatives was the formation of a
National Task Force on Information Technology and Software Development in May 1998.
The Task Force had a directive to formulate the draft of a long-term National IT Policy. In
October 1999, the Government set up the new Ministry of Information Technology (MIT), as
the nodal agency for facilitating all initiatives in the Central Government, the State
Governments, academia, the private sector and among successful Indian IT professionals
abroad. The NDA Government approved setting up of an IT venture capital fund of Rs. 100
crores for software companies and then took a series of measures to develop a road map for
India in e-commerce. Afterwards, the Government also enacted the Information Technology
(IT) Act, 2000, not only to provide a legal framework for e-commerce and prevention of
computer crimes, but also to accelerate induction of IT in critical sectors of the Indian
economy.
After the United Progressive Alliance (UPA-I) government came to power at the
Centre with Dr. Manmohan Singh as its Prime Minister in May 2004, apart from continuing
support for the IT industry, it also started using IT as a tool for raising the living standards of
the masses, which became the vision of the government’s IT policy. Towards this end, the
Department of Information Technology (DIT) took up an ambitious programme of personal
computer (PC) Internet penetration to the rural and undeserved urban areas. The Department
also announced a programme to establish State Wide Area Network (SWAN) up to the block
level to provide connectivity for e-Governance. DIT also set up Community Information
Centres (CICs) in hilly, far-flung areas of the North-East and Jammu and Kashmir to
facilitate the spread of benefit of information and communication technology. It was also
proposed to set up CICs in other hilly, far-flung areas of the country like Uttaranchal,
Andaman and Nicobar & Lakshadweep.
In order to ensure that the benefits of Information Technology reach the common
people, the Government initiated a move to make available tools and fonts in various Indian
languages freely to the general public during 2006–2007. The National e-Governance Plan
(NeGP) was approved by the Government of India on 18 May 2006 with the following
vision: “Make all Government services accessible to the common man in his locality, through
common service delivery outlets and ensure efficiency, transparency and reliability of such
services at affordable costs to realize the basic needs of the common man” (Chauhan, 2009).
The NeGP comprises of Mission Mode Projects (MMPs) and core e-infrastructure. The
NeGP identifies 27 Mission Mode Projects (MMPs) and eight components of its e-
infrastructure. The eight components of the Plan are broadly divided into two categories:
three core infrastructural components, and five others. The first category covers mainly core
infrastructural components: State Wide Area Network (SWAN), State Data Center (SDC) and
Common Service Centres (CSCs), while the other category covers five broad areas like
standards, capacity building, awareness and communications, assessment, and research and
development, which go a long way to ensure successful implementation, institutionalisation
and sustainability of NeGP. The 27 MMPs include eight integrated projects; eight central
projects and 11 state projects.
Apart from these three main core components were also identified by the NeGP.
Those components are as follows:
The Government approved the SWAN Scheme for establishing State Wide Area
Networks (SWANs) across the country in 35 States and Union Territories, at a total outlay of
Rs. 3,334 Crore over a period of 5 years. The objective of SWAN Scheme was to establish
converged network consisting of data, voice and video circuits with minimum 2 Mbps
capacity, linking the State with the Union Territories Headquarters, right up to the Block and
Tehsil headquarters, through the district and the Sub-division headquarters. The aim was to
create a secure government closed user group (CUG) network, for the purpose of delivering
Government-to-Citizen (G2C) and Government-to-Government (G2G) services.
State Data Centre (SDC) had been identified as one of the important element of the
Core infrastructure components for supporting NeGP. SDC provides key functionalities such
as central repository of the state, secure data storage, online delivery of services, Citizen
Information/Services portal, State Intranet portal, disaster recovery, remote management and
service integration, among others. The entire scheme involved an outlay of Rs. 17,000
million.
CSC involved a scheme for providing support for establishing 100,000 broadband
Internet-enabled Common Service Centers (CSCs) in rural areas of the country. The Scheme
had been approved at a total cost of Rs. 5742 Crores over 4 years, of which the Government
of India is estimated to contribute with Rs. 856 Crore and the State Governments with Rs.
793 Crores. Other resources would be mobilised from the private sector.
6.2.2 Other initiatives:
The Universal Service Obligation Fund (USOF) was established with the fundamental
objective of providing people in rural and remote areas access to ‘basic’ telephony services at
affordable prices. Subsequently, its scope was widened to provide subsidy support for
enabling access to all types of telephony services including mobile services and broadband
connectivity and for creation of infrastructure like optical fibre cables (OFC) in rural and
remote areas.
Recognising the vital role that information communication technology (ICT) can play
in the empowerment of rural women, a scheme called Sanchar Shakti had been launched in
March 2011 for pilot projects aimed at facilitating access of self-help groups (SHGs) to ICT-
enabled services.
Initiatives under the NeGP also included online services related to income tax,
Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) 21, passports and central excise. The government also
initiated new e-Governance projects for education, health, public distribution system and
postal services. The number of public services available to citizens in electronic mode would
be expanded through the Electronic Delivery of Services (EDS) Bill, approved by the union
cabinet on 20 December 2011.
After the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) led National Democratic Alliance’s (NDA)
Central government came to power on 26 May 2014, the mid-year union budget 2014–2015
was its first policy document. The government rose to power on the promise of good
governance and development for all—particularly by uplifting rural India through the
provision of urban amenities and technology upgrades.
Acknowledging that previous e-Governance initiatives undertaken by various State
Governments and Central Ministries have played a significant role in shaping the progressive
e-Governance strategy, the NDA Government wanted to speed up e-Governance
implementation across the various arms of Government at National, State and Local levels.
To transform the Indian information society to the Knowledge based society and to
uplift the penetration level of IT services domestically, ‘Digital India’ strategy has been
envisioned as an ambitious umbrella programme. It was launched on 01 July 2015 by Prime
Minister Narendra Modi. This would ensure broadband connectivity at village level,
improved access to services through IT-enabled platforms, greater transparency in
government processes and increased indigenous production of IT hardware and software.
• Broadband Highway
• Universal Access to Mobile connectivity
• Public Internet Access Programme
• E-Governance – Reforming Government through Technology
• E-Kranti - Electronic delivery of services
• Information for All
• Electronics Manufacturing
• IT for Jobs
• Early Harvest Programme
The e-governance initiatives which are already launched under this campaign can be
categorised in three broad categories, namely: Infrastructure, Services and Empowerment. As
of 31 December, 2017, the statistics of launched programs are as follows:
The earlier UPA government’s National Optical Fibre Network (NOFN) project has
been renamed by the NDA government as BharatNet, touted as the ‘backbone for Digital
India’. The project is aimed at providing 100 Mbps broadband connectivity to approximately
2.5 lacs gram panchayats across India.
Following the previous government’s support for the Aadhaar program, the current
government has introduced a potential large-scale, technology-enabled, real-time Direct
Benefit Transfer (DBT) system, namely the JAM (Jan Dhan-Aadhaar-Mobile) number
Trinity solution. The JAM Trinity refers to the consolidation of three spokes in the wheel of
economic policies meant to drive the financial inclusion measures as well as make various
payments secured.
7. Conclusion:
Through all the above discussion it is evident that the UPA-I & II Governments had
taken various initiatives to promote the growth of the IT industry in India and had been a key
catalyst for increased IT adoption—through sectors reforms that encourage IT acceptance.
During the UPA-II Government, the Draft National Policy on Information Technology 2011
emphasised adoption of technology enabled approaches to overcome developmental
challenges in education, health, skill development, financial inclusion, employment
generation and governance. On the other hand, the new government in India under the
leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi has sought to pursue e-Governance as a part of
its bigger strategy to improve governance and reduce corruption in the country. There
is empirical evidence supporting the efficacy of e-Governance as a tool to
reduce corruption.
All that is required is strong determination among people, good policy–makers and
political support to bridge the digital divide. Libraries and information centres have a special
role in providing information to all in order to reduce the gap between those who have the
facilities to access digital information and those who do not. The country needs to improve
the infrastructure of public libraries and link them with community information centres.
Reference
Asia Internet Stats by Country and 2017 Population Statistics. (2017). Retrieved on
November 24, 2017, from http://www.internetworldstats.com/asia.htm#in
Dutta, D., & De, S. (2014). Socio-Economic Dynamics of the ICT Industry’s Regional
Growth in India. In D. Dutta (Ed.), Inclusive Growth and Development in the 21st
Century: A Structural and Institutional Analysis of China and India (pp. 191-217).
Dutta, D. (2017). Development under dualism and digital divide in twenty-first century India.
Singapore: Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6344-2
Garofalakis, J., & Koskeris, A. (2009). Digital divide and rural communities: Practical
solutions and policies. In E. Ferro et al (ed.) Handbook of Research on Overcoming
Digital Divides: Constructing an Equitable and Competitive Information Society:
Constructing an Equitable and Competitive Information Society, 386.
Hu, W. M., & Prieger, J. (2008). Competition in broadband provision and the digital divide.
In Yogesh K. Dwivedi, Anastasia Papazafeiropoulou and Jyoti Choudrie
(ed.) Handbook of research on global diffusion of broadband data transmission, 1,
241-259.
Müller, J., Sancho, J. M., & Hernández, F. (2009). New media literacy and the digital divide.
In Handbook of research on new media literacy at the K-12 level: Issues and
challenges (pp. 72-88). IGI Global.
Mutula, S. M. (2005). Bridging the digital divide through e-governance: A proposal for
Africa's libraries and information centres. The Electronic Library, 23(5), 591-602.
McNeal, R. S., Tolbert, C. J., Mossberger, K., & Dotterweich, L. J. (2003). Innovating in
digital government in the American states. Social Science Quarterly, 84(1), 52-70.
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI). (2017). Annual Report, 2015-16. Retrieved
on November 23, 2017 from
http://www.trai.gov.in/sites/default/files/TRAI_Report2015-
16%20ENG24_4_2017.pdf