Scribd
Upload
10 views5 pages

PID Controllers

The document outlines assignments related to a spring mass damper system and the implementation of various controllers (P, P+I, P+D, P+I+D) using MATLAB Simulink. It includes tasks to find the step response, time domain specifications, and simulations without and with controllers. Additionally, it poses relevant questions regarding PID controllers and their functionalities.

Uploaded by

Krishnendu Das
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
10 views5 pages

PID Controllers

The document outlines assignments related to a spring mass damper system and the implementation of various controllers (P, P+I, P+D, P+I+D) using MATLAB Simulink. It includes tasks to find the step response, time domain specifications, and simulations without and with controllers. Additionally, it poses relevant questions regarding PID controllers and their functionalities.

Uploaded by

Krishnendu Das
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Future Institute of

Electronics And Engineering And Management


Communication Engineering
Department
VI.
ASSIGNMENTS:
open loop transter Consider a unity
function G(s) =1/ feedback spring mass damper system having an
(1) Find the step (s+1Os+20).
response of the system &
specifications &steady state error
(2) Employ a
determine all the time domain response
also.
3) Employ aproportional (P)
P+I controller controller in the system with Kp-300 &repeat Q.(1).
(4) Employ aP+D in the system
controller in the
with Kp-300 &K-70 &repeat Q.(1).
(5) Employ aP+I+D system with K=300 & Kp=10 8& repeat
Q.(1). controller in the system Q.(1).
with Kp-300, Kp=10 &K-70 &repeat
(6) Perform the above
operations using MATLAB simulink
PROGRAM: (1| toolbox.
PROGRAM: (2]
clear
q): t}(),0 .10,201)

HHe

iHe ('GfAfa 2)
PROGRAM: (3 4 PROGRAM: 14 3

clea
kp 3oD,
kp 3oD
!(tv0,oD,[i)
kd

?4: udbach (y3.9

40
Future Institute of Engineering And Management FIEM ag
Electronics And Communication Engineering Department
PROGRAM: [5]
lc
clear
Boo
paralld ('po kiy
paralll (k, ki).
l>
HHe (
OUTPUT:
Time domain specifications
Com ment
Program
No. %Mp ess
t tp
09524
2
A- 0 7 6 o 1 2 | 0 2 4 | 1 S 3 0 - 0 6
3
4
|0 1790194 4 2 33
41
Future Institute of
Electronics And Engineering And Management
Comnunication Engineering
Department FIEM
VIL.
SIMULINK BLOCK DIAGRAMS:
(1) Without
any Controller:

(2) With
Proportional(P) Controller:

(3) With P+I Controller:

sRa1os 2o

42
Future Institute
of
Electronics And Engineering And
Communication EngineeriManagement
ng Department FEM
Fahure rhte
fingnetg
and kanagamt

(4) With P+D


Controller:

(5) With P+l+D


Controller:

At

VII. CONCLUSION:

kaso
to kasD horo rD Conbelles
e caue
smulakO n HerLeg
dai

43
Euture Institute of Engineering And
And
Management FIEM: finghea

Comnmunication Engineering
nd M i n a g t
aOElectronics

Department

RELEVANTQUESTIONS:

What are
the advantages &disadvantages of PID controller?
)

he

ramieent

derivative controller is not used alone?


(2) Why entr
a Cos nt

control"?
called as "Reset
control action is eoccor
(3) Why the integral tate
eliminetk
teady
acb

bukheje (Teacher's Signature)

(Student's Signatute) 44

You might also like