TexAM2011 SuccessfulSelectionAndOperation
TexAM2011 SuccessfulSelectionAndOperation
net/publication/258381813
CITATIONS READS
60 10,832
3 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Rainer Kurz on 17 October 2017.
Dr. Brun manages the Machinery Section Gas turbines ingest a large amount of ambient air during
at Southwest Research Institute. His operation. Because of this, the quality of the air entering the
experience includes positions in turbine is a significant factor in the performance and life of the
engineering, project management, and gas turbine. A filtration system is used to control the quality of
management at Solar Turbines, General the air by removing harmful contaminants that are present. The
Electric, and Alstom. He holds two selection of the filtration system can be a daunting task,
patents (4 patents pending), authored over because there are many factors to consider. The system should
80 papers, and published a textbook on be selected based on the operational philosophy and goals for
gas turbines. Dr. Brun won an R&D 100 the turbine, the contaminants present in the ambient air, and
award in 2007 for his Semi-Active Valve expected changes in the contaminants in the future due to
invention and ASME Oil & Gas Committee Best Paper awards temporary emission sources or seasonal changes. This tutorial
in 1998, 2000, 2005, 2009, and 2010. He was chosen to the "40 outlines the primary considerations for selecting and installing
under 40" by the San Antonio Business Journal. He is a a gas turbine inlet filtration system. First, the consequences
255
that can occur due to improper inlet filtration are reviewed, then the compressor section is referred to as “cold corrosion” and is
the different characteristics are discussed, after this the due to wet deposits of salts, acid, and aggressive gases such as
components of a filtration system and considerations for the chlorine, and sulfides. Corrosion in the combustor and turbine
operating environment are outlined, and lastly, a procedure for sections is called “hot corrosion.” It is also referred to as high
quantitatively comparing inlet filtration system options is temperature corrosion. Hot corrosion requires the interaction of
provided. the metal surface with another chemical substance at elevated
temperatures. Hot corrosion is a form of accelerated oxidation
CONSEQUENCES OF POOR INLET FILTRATION that is produced by the chemical reaction between a component
and molten salts deposited on its surface. Hot corrosion
When the quality of the air entering the gas turbine is not comprises a complex series of chemical reactions, making
well control, there are several consequences which can occur. corrosion rates very difficult to predict. It is the accelerated
Some of the most common degradation mechanicals are oxidation of alloys caused by the deposit of salts (eg Na2SO4).
reviewed below including erosion, fouling, and corrosion. Type I or high temperature hot corrosion, occurs at a
temperature range of 1346 to 1742°F (730 to 950°C). Type II
Erosion or low temperature hot corrosion occurs at a temperature range
of 1022 to 1346ºF (550 to 730°C). Some of the more common
forms of hot corrosion are sulfidation, nitridation, chlorination,
Erosion occurs when solid or liquid particles carburization, and vanadium, potassium and lead hot
approximately 10 μm and larger impact rotating or stationary corrosion. Sulfidation Hot Corrosion requires the interaction of
surfaces in the gas turbine. The particles will impact the the metal surface with sodium sulfate or potassium sulfate, salts
surface and remove tiny particles of metal which eventually that can form in gas turbines from the reaction of sulfur oxides,
lead to changes in the geometry of the surface. This change in water, and sodium chloride (table salt) or potassium chloride,
geometry causes deviations in the air flow path, roughening of respectively. It is usually divided into type 1 and type 2 hot
smooth surfaces, alteration of clearances, and reduction of corrosion and Type 1 hot corrosion takes place above the
cross-sectional areas possibly in high stressed regions. Erosion melting temperature of sodium sulfate (1623°F (884ºC)) while
is a non-reversible process; therefore, the gas turbine type 2 occurs below this temperature. Hot corrosion is caused
components must be replaced in order to regain their original by the diffusion of sulfur from the molten sodium sulfate into
condition. However, particles 10 μm and larger are easily the metal substrate which prevents the formation of the
removed by commercial filters (Kurz and Brun, 2007, protective oxidation film and results in rapid removal of surface
McGuigan, 2004, Howes, 2004). metal. One should note that for hot corrosion to occur both
sulfur and salt (eg sodium chloride or potassium chloride or
Fouling chloride) have to be present in the very hot gas stream in and
downstream of the combustor. Sulfur and salt can come from
Fouling of compressor blades is an important mechanism the inlet air, from the fuel, or water (if water is injected). The
leading to performance deterioration in gas turbines over time. potassium hot corrosion mechanism is similar to sulfidation but
Fouling is caused by the adherence of particles to airfoils and is less frequently observed in gas turbines, unless the fuel
annulus surfaces. Particles that cause fouling are typically contains significant quantities of potassium.
smaller than 2 to 10 μm. Smoke, oil mists, carbon, and sea Corrosion is a non-reversible degradation mechanism.
salts are common examples. Fouling can be controlled by an Therefore, corroded components must be replaced in order to
appropriate air filtration system, and often reversed to some regain the original gas turbine performance. Corrosion also
degree by detergent washing of components. The adherence is initiates or advances other damage mechanisms in the gas
impacted by oil or water mists. The result is a build-up of turbine. For example, corrosion can intrude into cracks or other
material that causes increased surface roughness and to some material defects and accelerates crack propagation (Kurz and
degree changes the shape of the airfoil (if the material build up Brun, 2007, McGuigan, 2004, Howes, 2004).
forms thicker layers of deposits). Fouling in turn causes a
decrease in the performance of the gas turbine. FILTRATION CHARACTERISTICS
Commercial filters can remove the majority of particles
which cause fouling. But there are several submicron particles Filtration Mechanisms
which are difficult to remove from the flow stream. The build-
up of particles not removed by the inlet filtration system is
removed with the use of compressor washing. This process Filters in the filtration system use many different
recovers a larger portion of the compressor performance, but mechanisms to remove particles from the air. The filter media,
cannot bring the gas turbine back to its original condition (Kurz fiber size, packing density of the media, particle size, and
and Brun, 2007, McGuigan, 2004, Howes, 2004, Syverud et al., electrostatic charge influence how the filter removes particles.
2007, Baden, 1980). Each filter typically has various different mechanisms working
together to remove the particles. Four filtration mechanisms
Corrosion are shown in Figure 1.
Efficiency (%)
Interception
60
Sieving Particle
Diffusion
Flow Stream 40
Inertial Impaction
Electrostatic
20
Filter Fiber
Figure 1. Common Filtration Mechanism (Wilcox et al.,
0 0.1 1 10
2010).
Particle Size (micron)
Figure 2. Combination of Filtration Mechanisms to Obtain
The first filtration mechanism is inertial impaction. This
Filter Efficiency at Various Particle Sizes (Wilcox et al.,
type of filtration is applicable to particles larger than 1 μm in
2010).
diameter. The inertia of the large heavy particles in the flow
stream causes the particles to continue on a straight path as the
flow stream moves around a filter fiber. The particulate then Filter Efficiency and Classification
impacts and is attached to the filter media and held in place as
shown in the top picture of Figure 1. This type of filtration Filter efficiency is a broad term. In general, the filter
mechanism is effective in high velocity filtration systems. efficiency is the ratio of the weight, volume, area, or number of
The next filtration mechanism, diffusion, is effective for particles entering the filter to the weight, volume, area, or
very small particles typically less than 0.5 μm in size. number of the particles captured in the filter and ratings,
Effectiveness increases with lower flow velocities. Small respectively. A general efficiency calculation is shown in
particles interact with nearby particles and gas molecules. Equation (1) where W is the variable for which efficiency is
Especially in turbulent flow, the path of small particles being calculated. The efficiency can be expressed in several
fluctuates randomly about the main stream flow. As these ways: maximum, minimum, or average lifetime value. Many
particles diffuse in the flow stream, they collide with the fiber filters have poor performance against small particles at the
and are captured. The smaller a particle and the lower the beginning of their lives, but as the filter media becomes loaded
flowrate through the filter media, the higher probability that the with particles, it is able to catch smaller particles. In this case,
particle will be captured. the average efficiency would actually be higher than the initial
The next two filtration mechanisms are the most well efficiency. Some of the filters will never reach the quoted
known; interception and sieving. Interception occurs with maximum efficiency before they are replaced.
medium sized particles that are not large enough to leave the
flow path due to inertia or not small enough to diffuse. The Wentering − Wleaving
particles will follow the flow stream where they will touch a η= *100% (1)
fiber in the filter media and be trapped and held. Sieving is the Wentering
situation where the space between the filter fibers is smaller
than the particle itself, which causes the particle to be captured Filter efficiency is a trade-off against the pressure loss
and contained. across the filter. Normally, the filtration system pressure loss
Another mechanism not shown in Figure 1 is electrostatic will increase with an increase in filtration efficiency. As filters
charge. This type of filtration is effective for particles in the become more efficient, less dust penetrates through them.
0.01 to 2 μm size range (Figure 2). The filter works through Also, the air flow path is more constricted with higher
the attraction of particles to a charged filter. In gas turbine efficiency filters. This leads to higher pressure loss. Filter
applications, this charge is applied to the filter before engineers must determine the acceptable pressure loss and
installation as a result of the manufacturing process. Filters efficiency for their application. Studies have shown that a
always lose their electrostatic charge over time because the higher pressure loss due to using a high efficiency filter has a
257
lower effect on gas turbine power degradation than poor inlet F7/F9/E10 system to as little as 0.11 lb/year (0.05 kg/year).
air quality. This indicates two conclusions: While large particles have an
The efficiency of a filter cannot be stated as a general impact on fouling degradation, a significant amount is due to
characteristic. The filter efficiencies vary with particle size, the finer particles. The overall contaminant ingestion can be
typically being lower for small particles and higher for large influenced by several orders of magnitude by using an
particles. They also vary with operational velocity. Filters appropriate air filtration system. Also, with filtration systems of
designed for medium and low velocities will have a poor this type, there are virtually no particles larger than a few
performance at higher velocities and vice versa. Therefore, a microns entering the engine (Kurz and Brun, 2011).
particle size range and flow velocity must be associated with
the stated efficiency. For example, a filter may have 95 percent Table 1. Summary of filter classification for ASHRAE
filtration efficiency for particles greater than 5 μm at a 52.2:2007, EN 779:2002, and EN 1822:2009.
volumetric flowrate of 3000 cfm (5097 m3/h), but the efficiency
could be reduced to less than 70 percent for particles less than 5
μm or at a volumetric flowrate of 4000 cfm (6796 m3/h).
Filters are rated for performance based on standards
established in the United States of America and Europe. These
filter ratings are based on the results of standard performance
tests. In the United States, ASHRAE standard 52.2: 2007
outlines the requirements for performance tests and the
methodology to calculate the efficiencies. In this standard, the
efficiencies are determined for various ranges of particles sizes.
The filter is given a Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value
(MERV) rating based on its performance on the particle size
ranges (particle count efficiency) and the weight arrestance
(weight efficiency). The weight arrestance is a comparison of
the weight of the dust penetrating the filter to the dust feed into
the flow stream. In this standard, a filter with a MERV of 10
will have 50 to 65 percent minimum efficiency for particles 1 to Filter Pressure Loss
3 μm in size and greater than 85 percent for particles 3 to 10
μm in size (Owens, 2009, Loud and Slaterpryce, 1991). As mentioned above, a higher pressure loss occurs with a
The European standards used to determine performance are more efficient filter due to air flow restrictions. Pressure loss
EN 779: 2002 and EN 1822:2009. EN 779: 2002 is used to rate has a direct impact on the gas turbine performance, as it causes
coarse and fine efficiency filters. EN 1822:2009 presents a a reduction in compressor inlet pressure. For the compressor to
methodology for determining the performance of high overcome the inlet system losses, the gas turbine will consume
efficiencies filters: Efficient Particulate Air filters (EPA), High more fuel, and it also has a reduced power output. As the
Efficiency Particulate Air filter (HEPA), and Ultra Low Particle pressure loss increases the power decreases and the heat rate
Air filter (ULPA). In EN 779: 2002, the performance is found increases linearly. A 0.2 inH2O (50 Pa) reduction of pressure
with average separation efficiency which is an average of the loss can result in a 0.1 percent improvement in power output.
removal efficiency of 0.3 μm particles at four test flowrates Typical pressure losses on inlet filtration systems can range
(particle count efficiency) for fine filters and with an average from 2 to 6 inH2O (500 to 1500 Pa) (Gas, 2009).
arrestance (weight efficiency) for coarse particle filters. This The filter’s performance needs to be assessed for the full
standards rates the filters with a letter and number designation: pressure loss range over its life, not just when it is new. The
G1 to G4 (coarse filters) and F5 to F9 (fine filters). Filter pressure loss will increase over the lifetime of the filter.
performance is determined by the Most Penetrating Particle Therefore, one can expect a lower gas turbine performance over
Size efficiency (MPPS) in EN 1822: 2009. The MPPS is the life of the filter, or filters have to be changed or cleaned
defined as the particle size which has the minimum filtration periodically in order to maintain a low pressure loss. The
efficiency or maximum penetration during the filter testing. change of pressure loss over time is highly dependent upon the
The particle sizes tested range from 0.15 to 0.3 μm. The filter filter selection and the type and amount of contaminants
efficiency is calculated based on particle count. These filters experienced.
are given a rating of E10 to E12 for EPA type filters, H13 to
H14 for HEPA type filters, and U15 to U17 for ULPA filters. Filter Loading (Surface or Depth)
Table 1 gives a general overview of the efficiencies for each
filter rating and a comparison of the filter ratings between During operation as the filter collects particles, it is slowly
American and European standards (ASHRAE 52.2, 2007, DIN loaded until it reaches a “full” state. This state is usually
EN 779, 2002, DIN EN-1-5 1822, 2009). defined as the filter reaching a specified pressure loss, or when
If an engine ingests 220 lb/year (100 kg/year) of the end of maintenance interval. Filters are loaded in two
contaminants if there were no filtration system in a typical off different ways: surface and depth loading.
shore application, an F5 filter would reduce this to about 46 Depth loading is the type of filtration where the particles
lb/year (21 kg/year), an F6 filter to 13 lb/year (6 kg/year), a are captured inside of the filter material. To regain the original
F7/E10 filter system to 0.44 lb/year (0.20 kg/year) and a
258
pressure loss or condition, the filter must be replaced. the particles, the life of the high efficiency filters is extended.
The other type of filter is a surface loaded filter. With this Overall, low velocity systems can be more effective at reducing
type of loading, the particles collect on the surface of the filter. the mass of contaminants which enter a system, thus extending
Few of the particles may penetrate the fiber material, but not the water wash intervals for the engine (Figure 3).
enough to call for a replacement of the filter. Surface loaded
filters are most commonly used in, but not restricted to, self-
cleaning systems, because the dust can easily be removed with
pulses of air once the filter differential pressure reaches a
certain level. Once the filter is cleaned, the pressure loss across
the filter will be close to its original condition. The surface
loaded filter’s efficiency actually increases as the surface is
loaded with dust, because a dust cake develops on the surface
of the media, creating an additional filtration layer and also
decreases the amount of available flow are in the filter media
(Retka and Wylie, 1987, Klink and Schroth, 1996).
Face Velocity
Figure 3. Comparison of fractional efficiency for filter
Filtration systems are distinctively classified as high, elements from different suppliers and different face
medium, or low velocity systems. The velocity of the filtration velocities in new and dirty conditions (Brekke et al., 2009).
system is defined as the actual volumetric air flow divided by
the total filter face area. Low velocity systems have air flow at Water and Salt Effects
less than 500 ft/min (2.54 m/s) at the filter face. Medium Many environments where gas turbines operate will have
velocities are in the range of 610 to 680 ft/min (3.1 to 3.45 wet ambient conditions. This could be in a tropical environment
m/s). High velocity systems have air flows at the filter face in where it rains a significant amount of time or coastal location
excess of 780 ft/min (4 m/s). with ocean or lake mist. Table 2 is a list of the different types
of moisture that can be experienced together with their particle
High Velocity Systems size. The difference between filter operation in wet and dry
conditions can be significant. In some cases, the pressure loss
Historically, high velocity systems are used on marine across a filter can increase significantly even with a little
vessels and offshore platforms where space and weight are moisture. This is true for cellulose fiber filters which swell
premiums. However, today, low, medium, and high velocity when they are wet. These filters will also retain the moisture
systems are found on marine and offshore applications. High which can lead to long periods of time when the pressure loss
velocity systems have the advantages of reduced size (cross across the filter is elevated.
sectional area), weight, and initial cost. Filter efficiencies for
small particles are significantly lower than those of lower Table 2. Different Types of Moisture Experience in Inlet
velocity systems, and dust holding capacities are lower. Filtration Systems (McGuigan, 2004, Stalder and Sire,
High velocity systems typically use vane separators 2001).
upstream, and often also downstream, of the filter media to Description Liquid Size (μm)
remove water from the air stream. For the vanes to work Humidity vapor form
effectively, higher flow velocities are necessary. Ultimately, Smog (more smoke than
0.01 to 2
this type of system requires more filter replacements when humidity)
compared to the lower velocity system of similar performance Cooling Tower Aerosols 1 to 50
(Mudge and Hiner, 2001, Oswald and Hiner, 2006). Water mist 1 to 50
Clouds and fog 2 to 150
Low Velocity Systems Water Spray (ship wake,
10 to 500
ocean spray)
Low velocity systems are the standard on land based Drizzle 50 to 400
applications; however, high velocity systems are also used in Rain 400 to 1000
some coastal applications. The low velocity systems are
characterized by large inlet surface areas, large filter housings, Salt can have a direct effect on the life of a gas turbine if
and usually multiple stages of filters. The two or three stage not removed properly. It is often carried into the engine
filters provide an advantage over high velocity systems, dissolved in water spray. Salt can lead to fouling and
because they have a high efficiency filter stage as the final corrosion. Gas turbine manufacturers usually recommend
stage to remove many small particles (especially salt) below 1 stringent criteria on the amount of salt which can be allowed to
μm. Recently developed filter media can also keep water from enter the gas turbine (less than 0.01 ppm). In coastal
penetrating the media, and thus entering the gas turbine. The environments, the air borne salt can easily range from 0.05 to
lower velocity also provides a lower pressure loss or higher 0.5 ppm on a typical day. If the filtration system is not
filtration efficiency. Using pre-filters to remove the majority of equipped to handle the salt, it can enter the compressor and the
259
hot section of the gas turbine. Salt is present in the air either as cardboard, bags, and other objects. The screens also deflect
salt dust or dissolved in seawater, and contains sodium birds, leaves, and insects. Screens that are installed specifically
chloride, magnesium chloride, and calcium sulfate. Salt may for preventing insects entering the filtration system are referred
also come from localized sources such as a dry salt bed to as insect screens. These screens will have a finer grid than
(McGuigan, 2004, Stalder and Sire, 2001). The salt on trash screens. Weather hoods, louvers, trash screens, and insect
compressor blades must be removed through water washing screens are used on the majority of filtration systems due to
methods or direct scrubbing of the blades. their inexpensive cost and construction, and negligible pressure
loss (Loud and Slaterpryce, 1991).
COMPONENTS OF A FILTRATION SYSTEM
Anti-icing Protection
In order to protect the gas turbine from the variety of
contaminants present in the ambient air, several filtration Anti-icing protection is used in climates with freezing
devices are used. Each of the devices used in modern filtration weather. Freezing climates with rain or snow can cause icing
systems are discussed below. of inlet components which can result in physical damage to
inlet ducts or to the gas turbine compressor. This ice can also
Weather Protection and Trash Screens affect the performance of the gas turbine. If ice forms on filter
elements, then ice on those filters will be blocking the flow
Weather louvers or hoods and trash screens are the most path which will cause the velocity at the other filters to
simplistic of the filtration mechanisms but they are important in increase. This causes a decrease in filtration efficiency. Also,
order to reduce the amount of moisture and particles which the filter elements with ice can be damaged. Figure 5 shows an
enter the main filtration system. These are not classified as example of ice formation on filters due to cooling tower drift.
filters, but they are part of the filtration system and provide Heaters or compressor bleed air are often used in the inlet
assistance in removal of large objects or particles carried in the system in frigid environments to prevent the moisture in the air
flow stream. from freezing on the inlet bell mouth or filter elements.
Weather hoods are sheet metal coverings on the entrance
of the filtration system (see Figure 4). The opening of the hood Inertial Separators
is pointed downward so the ambient air must turn upwards to
flow into the inlet filtration system. The turning of the air is Inertial separation takes advantage of the physical
effective at minimizing rain and snow penetration. Weather principles of momentum, gravity, centrifugal forces, and
hoods and louvers are used on the majority of inlet filtration impingement, and the physical difference between phases to
systems, and they are essential for systems in areas with large cause particles to be moved out of the gas stream in such a way
amounts of rainfall or snow. Weather hoods or another that they can be carried off or drained. The higher momentum
comparable weather protection system are strongly of the dust or water particles contained in the air stream causes
recommended for all systems with high efficiency filter. them to travel forward, while the air can be diverted to side
ports and exit by a different path than the dust. There are many
types of inertial separators, but the ones commonly used with
gas turbine inlet filtration are vane and cyclone separators
(Loud and Slaterpryce, 1991, Principles, 2009).
After the weather hood is a series of turning vanes called Figure 5. Cartridge Filters with Frost Build Up Due to
weather louvers which redirect the air so that it must turn. The Cooling Tower Drift (Wilcox et al., 2010).
weather louvers are also effective at minimizing water and
snow penetration. After the weather hood or louver is a trash or
insect screen. Trash screens capture large pieces of paper,
260
Moisture Coalescers Three common types of high efficiency filters are EPA, HEPA
and ULPA. EPA and HEPA filters are defined as having a
In environments with high concentration of liquid moisture minimum efficiency of 85 percent and 99.95 percent,
in the air, coalescers are required in order to remove the liquid respectively, for all particles greater than or equal to 0.3 μm.
moisture. The coalescer works by catching the small water ULPA filters have a minimum efficiency of 99.9995 percent for
droplets in its fibers. As the particles are captured, they particles the same size or larger than 0.12 μm (DIN EN 779,
combine with other particles to make larger water droplets. 2002, DIN EN-1-5 1822, 2009). Often, these names are used
Coalescers are designed to allow the droplets to either drain loosely with discussion of high efficiency filtration. However,
down the filter or be released back into the flow stream. If the the majority of the high efficiency filters used in gas turbine
larger drops are released, then they are captured downstream by inlet filtration do not meet these requirements.
a separator. Figure 6 shows an example of how the droplet size The high efficiency filters used with gas turbines have
distribution changes across the coalescer which releases the pleated media which increases the surface area. In order to
droplets (Loud and Slaterpryce, 1991, Principles, 2009). achieve the high filtration efficiency, the flow through the filter
fiber is highly restricted which creates a high pressure loss,
25 unless the face velocity is kept low. The pleats help reduce this
Upstream pressure loss. Initial pressure loss on high efficiency filters can
Downstream be up to 1 inH2O (250 Pa) with a final pressure loss in the
20 range of 2.5 inH2O (625 Pa) for rectangular filters and 4 inH2O
Distribution (%)
(2000 Pa) for cartridge filters. The life of the filters is highly
15 influenced by other forms of filtration upstream. If there are
stages of filtration to remove larger solid articles and liquid
moisture, then these filters will have a longer life. Minimal
10
filtration before high efficiency filters will lead to more
frequent replacement or cleaning. High efficiency filters are
5 rated under various standards. The majority of filters used in
gas turbines are not classified as EPA, HEPA, or ULPA. The
0 filters used in gas turbines are rated with ASHRAE 52.2: 2007
and EN 779: 2002.
10 0 20 30 There are many different constructions of high efficiency
Particle Size (micron) type filters: rectangular, cylindrical/ cartridge, and bag filters.
Figure 6. Coalescer Droplet Formation Distribution (Wilcox The rectangular high efficiency filters are constructed by
et al., 2010). folding a continuous sheet of media into closely spaced pleats
in a rectangular rigid frame. Rectangular filters are depth
Prefilters loaded; therefore, once they reach the maximum allowable
pressure loss, they should be replaced. Two examples of
The air has a mixture of large and small particles. If a one- rectangular high efficiency filters are shown in Figure 7. High
stage high efficiency filter is used, the build-up of large and efficiency filters can also be made from media that doesn’t
small solid particles can quickly lead to increased pressure loss allow water to seep through the filter media.
and filter loading. Prefilters are used to increase the life of the
downstream high efficiency filter by capturing the larger solid
particles. Therefore, the high efficiency filter only has to
remove the smaller particles from the air stream which
increases the filter life. Prefilters normally capture solid
particles greater than 10 μm, but some prefilters will also
capture the solid particles in the 2 to 5 μm size range. These
filters usually consist of large diameter synthetic fiber in a
disposable frame structure. Bag filters are also commonly used
for prefilters. These offer higher surface area which reduces
the pressure loss across the filter (Loud and Slaterpryce, 1991,
Principles, 2009). In many installations, the prefilters can be Figure 7. Rectangular High Efficiency Filters (Cam, 2009,
exchanged without having to shut the engine down. Industrial, 2009).
High Efficiency Filters Cartridge filters are also made up of closely spaced pleats,
but they are in a circular fashion (Figure 8). Air flows radially
As discussed above, there are filters for removing larger into the cartridge. They are installed in a horizontal or vertical
solid particles which prevent erosion and FOD. Smaller fashion (hanging downward). These types of filters can be
particles which lead to corrosion, fouling, and cooling passage depth or surface loaded. The surface loaded filters are
plugging are removed with high efficiency filters. These types commonly used with a self-cleaning system, but not all of them
of filters have average separations greater than 80 percent. are designed for self-cleaning. Cartridge filters used in self-
261
cleaning systems require a more robust structural design in typically only pulses 10 percent of the elements at a given time.
order to protect the filter fiber media during the reverse air With this type of cleaning, the filter can be brought back to near
pulses. The more common structural support is a wire cage the original condition (Retka and Wylie, 1987, Neaman and
around the pleated media on the inside and outside of the filter. Anderson, 1980).
The filters shown in Figure 8 are not designed for a self-
cleaning system since there are no structural supports on the Staged Filtration
outside of the filter. Self-cleaning filtration systems are
discussed in the next section (Loud and Slaterpryce, 1991, Any gas turbine application typically needs more than one
Principles, 2009). type of filter, and there are no “universal filters” that will serve
all needs. Therefore, two-stage or three–stage filtration
systems are used. In these designs, a prefilter or weather louver
can be used first to remove erosive particles, rain, and snow.
The second may be a low to medium-performance filter
selected for the type of finer-sized particles present or a
coalescer to remove liquids. The third filter is usually a high-
performance filter to remove smaller particles less than 2 μm in
View of Pleats in Cartridge Filter size from the air. Figure 10 shows a generalized view of a
filtration arrangement. This arrangement is not correct for all
cases due to the fact that the filter stages are highly influenced
High Efficiency Cartridge Filters
by the environment they are operating in.
Figure 8. High Efficiency Cartridge Filters (Wilcox et al.,
2010). Weather Protection Prefilter
Snow, rain, birds, large
Particles 2-5 microns High Efficiency
debris
Air In Filter Gas Turbine
Inertial Separator Coalescer Particles < 2 microns
NPV =
A
i
(
1 − [1 + i ]
−n
) (4)
can provide estimates of the expected degradation rate. A few
examples are the models presented by Zaba (1985), Kurz and
Brun (2001), and Meher-Homji et al (2009).
1 + e 1 + e
n Once the degradation rate is calculated the lost profit due
NPV = A 1 −
1 − e 1 + i
(5) to reduced gas turbine output and increased fuel cost due to
increased heat rate can be calculated. This cost should be
included in each year of the analysis.
The NPVs must be determined for each cost. Then the cost will Compressor washing is often performed in a gas turbine in
be added together to obtain the total NPV or LCC cost order to minimize the effects fouling on the performance of the
(Europump, 2001). gas turbine. The use of compressor washing may reduce the
rate of degradation in the gas turbine. However, the most
Considerations for an Inlet Filtration System effective type of washing is on-crank washing, which requires
that the engine is shut down. This results in a lower availability
of the engine, and, associated with this, may cause the cost of
In a LCC analysis for a gas turbine inlet filtration, there are lost production.
six main parameters: purchase price/initial cost, maintenance
cost, availability/reliability of the gas turbine, gas turbine Pressure Loss
degradation and compressor washing, pressure loss, and
failures of the filtration system or gas turbine due to inlet air
quality (Wilcox et al., 2010). The pressure loss across the inlet filtration system can also
have a significant effect on the cost of the inlet filtration
Purchase Price/Initial Cost system. An increase in the pressure loss across the filtration
system leads to reduced power output from the gas turbine and
an increased heat rate. The cost of these effects should be
The purchase price occurs in the first year of the LCC included yearly in the LCC analysis.
analysis. It is the cost to purchase and install the inlet filtration
system. An estimate for this value can be obtained from the Failure/Event Cost
filter vendor or gas turbine manufacturer.
Maintenance Cost The last cost is any cost associated with a failure or event
that occurs due to the inlet filtration system or inlet air quality.
This could be a failure of a filter material which requires
The maintenance cost includes the cost of filter
shutdown for replacement or a failure of a gas turbine blade
replacement and disposal and any maintenance to auxiliary
which occurred due to corrosion from poor inlet air quality.
systems for the inlet filtration system. It is a recurring cost that
These costs are often included based on past experience with
should be included in each year that the cost is acquired. This
the gas turbine or other filtration systems.
cost can be calculated based on estimated filter change out
frequencies, cost of filters from vendors, labor cost for
SUMMARY
maintenance, and cost of downtime to replace filters.
Gas turbine degradation is perhaps the most important cost e = Escalation rate
267
i = Discount rate 8-12.
n = Year cost occurs Howes, S., 2004, “Selecting Gas-Turbine Inlet Air Systems for
New, Retrofit Applications,” Combined Cycle Journal,
A = Cost in present value Second Quarter.
HEPA = High Efficiency Particle Air filter “Industrial Filtration,” 2009, Burgess-Manning Bulletin BM-2-
NPV = Net Present Value 301A.
W = Weight, volume, area, or particle number Klink, A. and Schroth, T., 1996, “New Solutions for Improved
Intake Air Filtration of Gas Turbines and
η = Efficiency Turbocompressors,” Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo
1996.
REFERENCES Kurz, R. and Brun, K, 2001, “Degradation in Gas Turbine
Systems,” Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and
ASHRAE 52.2 , 2007, Method of Testing General Ventilation Power, vol. 123.
Air-Cleaning Devices for Removal Efficiency by Particle Kurz, R. and Brun, K., 2011, “Fouling Mechanisms in Axial
Size, American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air- Compressors,” ASME paper GT2011-45012.
Conditioning Engineers, Inc. Kurz, R. and Brun, K., 2007, “Gas Turbine Tutorial –
Baden, T. Z., 1980, “Losses in Gas Turbines Due to Deposits Maintenance and Operating Practices Effects on
on the Blading,” Brown Boveri Review, 67 (12), pg. 715- Degradation and Life,” Proceedings of 36th
722. Turbomachinery Symposium.
Brake, C., 2007, “Identifying Areas Prone to Dusty Winds for Loud, R. L. and Slaterpryce, A. A., 1991, “Gas Turbine Inlet
Gas Turbine Inlet Specification,” Proceedings of Turbo Air Treatment,” GE Power Generation, GER-3419A.
Expo 2007, Montreal, Canada. McGuigan, P. T., 2004, “Salt in the Marine Environment and
Brekke, O., Bakken, L., and Syverud, E., 2009, “Filtration of the Creation of a Standard Input for Gas Turbine Air Intake
Gas Turbine Intake Air in Offshore Installations: The Gap Filtration Systems,” Proceedings of ASME TurboExpo,
Between Test Standards and Actual Operating Power for Land, Sea, and Air, Vienna, Austria.
Conditions,” Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2009, Meher-Homji, C., Chaker, M., and Bromley, A., 2009, “The
Orlando, FL. Fouling of Axial Flow Compressors – Causes, Effects,
“Cam GT for Turbomachinery,” 2009, Camfil Farr Product Susceptibility and Sensitivity,” Proceedings of ASME
Sheet. Turbo Expo 2009, Orlando, FL.
Cleaver, R. E., 1990, “Gas Turbine Filtration in Tropical Mudge, R. K. and Hiner, S. D., 2001, “Gas Turbine Intake
Environments,” Turbomachinery Maintenance Congress. Systems – High Velocity Filtration For Marine Gas
DIN EN 779, 2002, Particulate Air Filters for General Turbine Installations,” 2001-GT-0584, Proceedings of
Ventilation – Determination of the Filtration Performance, ASME Turbo Expo 2001, New Orleans, Louisiana.
European Committee for Standardization. Neaman, R. G. and Anderson, A. W., 1980, “Development and
DIN EN–1 1822, 2009, High Efficiency Air Filters – Part 1: Operating Experience of Automatic Pulse-Jet Self-
Classification, Performance Testing, Marking, European Cleaning Air Filters for Combustion Gas Turbines,”
Committee for Standardization. Proceedings of the Gas Turbine Conference and Products
DIN EN–2 1822, 2009, High Efficiency Air Filters – Part 2: Show, New Orleans, LA.
Aerosol Production, Measuring Equipment, Particle “Offshore Filter Systems”, 2009, Camfil Farr Brochure.
Counting Statistics, European Committee for Oswald, A. D. and Hiner, S. D., 2006, “More Efficient
Standardization. Applications For Naval Gas Turbines – Addressing the
DIN EN–3 1822, 2009, High Efficiency Air Filters – Part 3: Mismatch Between Available Technology and the
Testing Flat Sheet Filter Media, European Committee for Requirements of Modern Naval Gas Turbine Inlets,”
Standardization. GT2006-90305, Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2006:
DIN EN–4 1822, 2009, High Efficiency Air Filters – Part 4: Power for Land, Sea and Air, Barcelona, Spain.
Determining Leakage of Filter Element (Scan Method), Owens, M., 2009, “Engineering Bulletin – Compressor Fouling
European Committee for Standardization. Benhmark,” AAF International.
DIN EN–5 1822, 2009, High Efficiency Air Filters – Part 5: “Principles of Air Filtration,” 2009, Mueller Environmental
Determining The Efficiency of Filter Element, European Design, Inc.
Committee for Standardization. Retka, T. J. and Wylie, G. S., 1987, “Field Experience with
Europump and Hydraulic Institute, 2001, “Pump Life Cycle Pulse-Jet Self-Cleaning Air Filtration on Gas Turbines in
Costs: A Guide to LCC Analysis for Pumping Systems,” an Arctic Environment,” Journal of Engineering for Gas
First Edition. Turbines and Power, Vol 109, pg. 79 – 84.
“Gas Turbine World 2009 GTW Handbook,” 2009, Volume Stalder, J. and Sire, J., 2001, “Salt Percolation through Gas
27, pg 64. Turbine Air Filtration Systems and Its Contribution to
“HEPA Filtration Facts,” 2009, Donaldson Filtration Total Contaminant Level,” Proceedings of the Joint Power
Solutions. Generation Conference, New Orleans, LA.
Hill, D. G., 1973, “Gas Turbine Intake Systems in Unusual Syverud, E., Brekke, O., and Bakken, L., 2007, “Axial
Environments,” Proceedings of the Gas Turbine Compressor Deterioration Caused by Saltwater Ingestion,”
Conference and Products Show, Washington, D.C., April Journal of Turbomachinery, Vol. 129, pg. 119-126.
268
Wilcox, M., Baldwin, R., Garcia-Hernandez, A., and Brun, K.,
2010, “Guideline for Gas Turbine Inlet Air Filtration
Systems,” Gas Machinery Research Council.
Zaba, T. and Lombardi, P., 1985, Experience in the Operation
of Air Filters in Gas Turbine Installation, The Brown
Boveri Review, V 72, no. 4, pp. 165-171.