UNIT-I
Overview: Introduction:
Professional Software Development, Software Engineering Ethics, Case
studies.
Software Processes: Models, Process activities, Coping with Change, Process
improvement.
Requirements Engineering and System Modelling:
Software Requirements: Functional and Non-functional requirements,
Requirements Elicitation, Specification, Validation and Change
Topics covered
Software Processes
Software process models
Process activities
Coping with change
Process improvement
Chapter 2 Software Processes 2
The software process
A structured set of activities required to develop a
software system.
Many different software processes but all involve:
▪ Specification – defining what the system should do;
▪ Design and implementation – defining the organization of the
system and implementing the system;
▪ Validation – checking that it does what the customer wants;
▪ Evolution – changing the system in response to changing
customer needs.
A software process model is an abstract representation
of a process. It presents a description of a process from
some particular perspective.
Chapter 2 Software Processes 3
Software process descriptions
When we describe and discuss processes, we usually
talk about the activities in these processes such as
specifying a data model, designing a user interface, etc.
and the ordering of these activities.
Process descriptions may also include:
▪ Products, which are the outcomes of a process activity;
▪ Roles, which reflect the responsibilities of the people involved in
the process;
▪ Pre- and post-conditions, which are statements that are true
before and after a process activity has been enacted or a
product produced.
Chapter 2 Software Processes 4
Plan-driven and agile processes
Plan-driven processes are processes where all of the
process activities are planned in advance and progress
is measured against this plan.
In agile processes, planning is incremental and it is
easier to change the process to reflect changing
customer requirements.
In practice, most practical processes include elements of
both plan-driven and agile approaches.
There are no right or wrong software processes.
Chapter 2 Software Processes 5
Software process models
The waterfall model
▪ Plan-driven model. Separate and distinct phases of specification
and development.
Incremental development
▪ Specification, development and validation are interleaved. May
be plan-driven or agile.
Reuse-oriented software engineering
▪ The system is assembled from existing components. May be
plan-driven or agile.
In practice, most large systems are developed using a
process that incorporates elements from all of these
models.
Chapter 2 Software Processes 6
The waterfall model
Chapter 2 Software Processes 7
Waterfall model phases
There are separate identified phases in the waterfall
model:
▪ Requirements analysis and definition
▪ System and software design
▪ Implementation and unit testing
▪ Integration and system testing
▪ Operation and maintenance
The main drawback of the waterfall model is the difficulty
of accommodating change after the process is
underway. In principle, a phase has to be complete
before moving onto the next phase.
Chapter 2 Software Processes 8
Waterfall model problems
Inflexible partitioning of the project into distinct stages
makes it difficult to respond to changing customer
requirements.
▪ Therefore, this model is only appropriate when the requirements
are well-understood and changes will be fairly limited during the
design process.
▪ Few business systems have stable requirements.
The waterfall model is mostly used for large systems
engineering projects where a system is developed at
several sites.
▪ In those circumstances, the plan-driven nature of the waterfall
model helps coordinate the work.
Chapter 2 Software Processes 9
Incremental development
Chapter 2 Software Processes 10
Incremental development benefits
The cost of accommodating changing customer
requirements is reduced.
▪ The amount of analysis and documentation that has to be
redone is much less than is required with the waterfall model.
It is easier to get customer feedback on the development
work that has been done.
▪ Customers can comment on demonstrations of the software and
see how much has been implemented.
More rapid delivery and deployment of useful software to
the customer is possible.
▪ Customers are able to use and gain value from the software
earlier than is possible with a waterfall process.
Chapter 2 Software Processes 11
Incremental development problems
The process is not visible.
▪ Managers need regular deliverables to measure progress. If
systems are developed quickly, it is not cost-effective to produce
documents that reflect every version of the system.
System structure tends to degrade as new increments
are added.
▪ Unless time and money is spent on refactoring to improve the
software, regular change tends to corrupt its structure.
Incorporating further software changes becomes increasingly
difficult and costly.
Chapter 2 Software Processes 12
Reuse-oriented software engineering
Based on systematic reuse where systems are
integrated from existing components or COTS
(Commercial-off-the-shelf) systems.
Process stages
▪ Component analysis;
▪ Requirements modification;
▪ System design with reuse;
▪ Development and integration.
Chapter 2 Software Processes 13
Reuse-oriented software engineering
Chapter 2 Software Processes 14
Types of software component
Web services that are developed according to service
standards and which are available for remote invocation.
Collections of objects that are developed as a package
to be integrated with a component framework such as
.NET or J2EE.
Stand-alone software systems (COTS) that are
configured for use in a particular environment.
Chapter 2 Software Processes 15
The requirements engineering process
Chapter 2 Software Processes 16
Software design and implementation
The process of converting the system specification into
an executable system.
Software design
▪ Design a software structure that realises the specification;
Implementation
▪ Translate this structure into an executable program;
The activities of design and implementation are closely
related and may be inter-leaved.
Chapter 2 Software Processes 17
A general model of the design process
Chapter 2 Software Processes 18
Design activities
Architectural design, where you identify the overall
structure of the system, the principal components
(sometimes called sub-systems or modules), their
relationships and how they are distributed.
Interface design, where you define the interfaces
between system components.
Component design, where you take each system
component and design how it will operate.
Database design, where you design the system data
structures and how these are to be represented in a
database.
Chapter 2 Software Processes 19
Software validation
Verification and validation (V & V) is intended to show
that a system conforms to its specification and meets the
requirements of the system customer.
Involves checking and review processes and system
testing.
System testing involves executing the system with test
cases that are derived from the specification of the real
data to be processed by the system.
Testing is the most commonly used V & V activity.
Chapter 2 Software Processes 20
Stages of testing
Chapter 2 Software Processes 21
Testing stages
Development or component testing
▪ Individual components are tested independently;
▪ Components may be functions or objects or coherent groupings
of these entities.
System testing
▪ Testing of the system as a whole. Testing of emergent properties
is particularly important.
Acceptance testing
▪ Testing with customer data to check that the system meets the
customer’s needs.
Chapter 2 Software Processes 22
Testing phases in a plan-driven software
process
Chapter 2 Software Processes 23
Coping with change
Change is inevitable in all large software projects.
▪ Business changes lead to new and changed system
requirements
▪ New technologies open up new possibilities for improving
implementations
▪ Changing platforms require application changes
Change leads to rework so the costs of change include
both rework (e.g. re-analysing requirements) as well as
the costs of implementing new functionality
Chapter 2 Software Processes 24
Reducing the costs of rework
Change avoidance, where the software process includes
activities that can anticipate possible changes before
significant rework is required.
▪ For example, a prototype system may be developed to show
some key features of the system to customers.
Change tolerance, where the process is designed so that
changes can be accommodated at relatively low cost.
▪ This normally involves some form of incremental development.
Proposed changes may be implemented in increments that have
not yet been developed. If this is impossible, then only a single
increment (a small part of the system) may have be altered to
incorporate the change.
Chapter 2 Software Processes 25
Software prototyping
A prototype is an initial version of a system used to
demonstrate concepts and try out design options.
A prototype can be used in:
▪ The requirements engineering process to help with requirements
elicitation and validation;
▪ In design processes to explore options and develop a UI design;
▪ In the testing process to run back-to-back tests.
Chapter 2 Software Processes 26
Benefits of prototyping
Improved system usability.
A closer match to users’ real needs.
Improved design quality.
Improved maintainability.
Reduced development effort.
Chapter 2 Software Processes 27
The process of prototype development
Chapter 2 Software Processes 28
Prototype development
May be based on rapid prototyping languages or tools
May involve leaving out functionality
▪ Prototype should focus on areas of the product that are not well-
understood;
▪ Error checking and recovery may not be included in the
prototype;
▪ Focus on functional rather than non-functional requirements
such as reliability and security
Chapter 2 Software Processes 29
Throw-away prototypes
Prototypes should be discarded after development as
they are not a good basis for a production system:
▪ It may be impossible to tune the system to meet non-functional
requirements;
▪ Prototypes are normally undocumented;
▪ The prototype structure is usually degraded through rapid
change;
▪ The prototype probably will not meet normal organisational
quality standards.
Chapter 2 Software Processes 30
Incremental delivery
Rather than deliver the system as a single delivery, the
development and delivery is broken down into
increments with each increment delivering part of the
required functionality.
User requirements are prioritised and the highest priority
requirements are included in early increments.
Once the development of an increment is started, the
requirements are frozen though requirements for later
increments can continue to evolve.
Chapter 2 Software Processes 31
Incremental development and delivery
Incremental development
▪ Develop the system in increments and evaluate each increment
before proceeding to the development of the next increment;
▪ Normal approach used in agile methods;
▪ Evaluation done by user/customer proxy.
Incremental delivery
▪ Deploy an increment for use by end-users;
▪ More realistic evaluation about practical use of software;
▪ Difficult to implement for replacement systems as increments
have less functionality than the system being replaced.
Chapter 2 Software Processes 32
Incremental delivery
Chapter 2 Software Processes 33
Incremental delivery advantages
Customer value can be delivered with each increment so
system functionality is available earlier.
Early increments act as a prototype to help elicit
requirements for later increments.
Lower risk of overall project failure.
The highest priority system services tend to receive the
most testing.
Chapter 2 Software Processes 34
Incremental delivery problems
Most systems require a set of basic facilities that are
used by different parts of the system.
▪ As requirements are not defined in detail until an increment is to
be implemented, it can be hard to identify common facilities that
are needed by all increments.
The essence of iterative processes is that the
specification is developed in conjunction with the
software.
▪ However, this conflicts with the procurement model of many
organizations, where the complete system specification is part of
the system development contract.
Chapter 2 Software Processes 35
Process Improvement
Process Improvement
Understanding, Modelling and Improving the Software
Process
Objectives
To explain the principles of software process
improvement
To explain how software process factors influence
software quality and productivity
To introduce the SEI Capability Maturity Model
and to explain why it is influential. To discuss
the applicability of that model
To explain why CMM-based improvement is not
universally applicable
Topics covered
Process and product quality
Process analysis and modelling
Process measurement
The SEI process maturity model
Process classification
Process improvement
Understanding existing processes
Introducing process changes to achieve organisational
objectives which are usually focused on quality
improvement, cost reduction and schedule acceleration
Most process improvement work so far has
focused on defect reduction. This reflects the increasing
attention paid by industry to quality
However, other process attributes can be the focus of
improvement
Process attributes
Process improvement stages
Process analysis
▪ Model and analyse (quantitatively if possible) existing
processes
Improvement identification
▪ Identify quality, cost or schedule bottlenecks
Process change introduction
▪ Modify the process to remove identified bottlenecks
Process change training
▪ Train staff involved in new process proposals
Change tuning
▪ Evolve and improve process improvements
The process improvement process
Process and product quality
Process quality and product quality are closely
related
A good process is usually required to produce a
good product
For manufactured goods, process is the
principal quality determinant
For design-based activity, other factors are also involved
especially the capabilities of the designers
Principal product quality factors
Quality factors
For large projects with ‘average’ capabilities, the
development process determines product quality
For small projects, the capabilities of the developers is
the main determinant
The development technology is particularly significant for
small projects
In all cases, if an unrealistic schedule is imposed then
product quality will suffer
Process analysis and modelling
Process analysis
▪ The study of existing processes to understand the relationships
between parts of the process and to compare them with other
processes
Process modelling
▪ The documentation of a process which records the tasks, the
roles and the entities used
▪ Process models may be presented from different perspectives
Process analysis and modelling
Study an existing process to understand its
activities
Produce an abstract model of the process. You should
normally represent this graphically. Several different
views (e.g. activities, deliverables, etc.) may be required
Analyse the model to discover process
problems. Involves discussing activities with
stakeholders
Process analysis techniques
Published process models and process
standards
▪ It is always best to start process analysis with an existing model.
People then may extend and change this.
Questionnaires and interviews
▪ Must be carefully designed. Participants may tell you what they
think you want to hear
Ethnographic analysis
▪ Involves assimilating process knowledge by observation
Elements of a
process model
The module testing activity
Activities in module testing
©Ian Sommerville 1995 Software Engineering, 5th edition. Chapter 31. Slide ##
Process exceptions
Software processes are complex and process models
cannot effectively represent how to handle exceptions
▪ Several key people becoming ill just before a critical review
▪ A complete failure of a communication processor so that no e-
mail is available for several days
▪ Organisational reorganisation
▪ A need to respond to an unanticipated request for new proposals
Under these circumstances, the model is suspended and
managers use their initiative to deal with the exception
Process measurement
Wherever possible, quantitative process data
should be collected
▪ However, where organisations do not have clearly defined
process standards this is very difficult as you don’t know what to
measure. A process may have to be defined before any
measurement is possible
Process measurements should be used to
assess process improvements
▪ But this does not mean that measurements should drive the
improvements. The improvement driver should be the
organizational objectives
Classes of process measurement
Time taken for process activities to be
completed
▪ E.g. Calendar time or effort to complete an activity or
process
Resources required for processes or activities
▪ E.g. Total effort in person-days
Number of occurrences of a particular event
▪ E.g. Number of defects discovered
Goal-Question-Metric Paradigm
Goals
▪ What is the organisation trying to achieve? The objective of
process improvement is to satisfy these goals
Questions
▪ Questions about areas of uncertainty related to the goals. You
need process knowledge to derive these
Metrics
▪ Measurements to be collected to answer the questions
The Software Engineering Institute
US Defense Dept. funded institute associated
with Carnegie Mellon
Mission is to promote software technology
transfer particularly to defense contractors
Maturity model proposed in mid-1980s, refined
in early 1990s.
Work has been very influential in process
improvement
The SEI process maturity model
Maturity model levels
Initial
▪ Essentially uncontrolled
Repeatable
▪ Product management procedures defined and used
Defined
▪ Process management procedures and strategies defined
and used
Managed
▪ Quality management strategies defined and used
Optimising
▪ Process improvement strategies defined and used
Key process areas
SEI model problems
It focuses on project management rather than
product development.
It ignores the use of technologies such as rapid
prototyping.
It does not incorporate risk analysis as a key
process area
It does not define its domain of applicability
The CMM and ISO 9000
There is a clear correlation between the key processes
in the CMM and the quality management processes in
ISO 9000
The CMM is more detailed and prescriptive and includes
a framework for improvement
Organisations rated as level 2 in the CMM are likely to
be ISO 9000 compliant
Capability assessment
An important role of the SEI is to use the CMM to assess
the capabilities of contractors bidding for US government
defence contracts
The model is intended to represent organisational
capability not the practices used in particular projects
Within the same organisation, there are often wide
variations in processes used
Capability assessment is questionnaire-based
The capability assessment process
Process classification
Informal
▪ No detailed process model. Development team chose their
own way of working
Managed
▪ Defined process model which drives the development
process
Methodical
▪ Processes supported by some development method such
as HOOD
Supported
▪ Processes supported by automated CASE tools
Process applicability
Process choice
Process used should depend on type of
product which is being developed
▪ For large systems, management is usually the principal problem
so you need a strictly managed process. For smaller systems,
more informality is possible.
There is no uniformly applicable process which
should be standardised within an organisation
▪ High costs may be incurred if you force an inappropriate process
on a development team
Process tool support
Key points
Process improvement involves process analysis,
standardisation, measurement and change
Process models include descriptions of tasks,
activities, roles, exceptions, communications,
deliverables and other processes
Measurement should be used to answer specific
questions about the software process used
The three types of process metrics which can be
collected are time metrics, resource utilisation metrics
and event metrics
Key points
The Software Engineering Institute (SEI) model
classifies software processes as initial, repeatable,
defined, managed and optimising. It identifies key
processes which should be used at each of these
levels
The SEI model is appropriate for large systems
developed by large teams of engineers. It cannot be
applied without modification in other situations
Processes can be classified as informal, managed,
methodical and improving. This classification can be
used to identify process tool support