Gender Inclusive Development
Gender Inclusive Development
3.1 Introduction
Gender and development is an important topic in understanding how social sectors contribute
to progress. Historically, women have been sidelined in societal development. However,
modern development theories recognize the essential role of all members of society,
including women. Women form nearly half of the world’s population and are critical to the
success or failure of national development efforts.
Objectives:
Gender is the social dimension of being male or female. It refers to societal roles, behaviors,
and identities assigned to individuals. Unlike biological sex, gender is about how people
perceive themselves and how they express this identity. It involves social expectations and is
not restricted to being "masculine" or "feminine."
Gender helps analyze inequalities, particularly those affecting women. Development theories
now stress inclusive participation of all genders. Notable contributions:
● Amartya Sen emphasized that women should be viewed as active contributors, not
passive beneficiaries.
● Gender equality helps ensure that the benefits of development are distributed fairly.
Gender roles define expected behaviors of men and women. These vary across regions and
cultures. For example, rural women may be confined to household work, while urban women
may engage in economic and political activities due to better access to education.
Historical Development
Initial development models, especially in the 1930s–1970s, excluded women. Focus was on
modernization based on Western standards. It was assumed that benefits would automatically
reach all, which did not happen. As a result, many development projects worsened women’s
economic conditions.
● Democratic governance
● Poverty reduction
● HIV/AIDS
Importance of Women
Women contribute significantly to family, agriculture, livestock, and even small businesses.
Their participation in public decision-making is vital to holistic development.
Women’s access to the labor market improves household incomes and national economies.
Despite progress, gender discrimination in jobs still exists:
Societal roles often limit women’s economic options, particularly in rural or traditional
settings:
● In India, representation in Lok Sabha increased to 11% in the 15th Lok Sabha.
● Despite local reservations, many elected women serve as figureheads for male
relatives.
● Enhancing confidence.
● Biological risks.
● Unsafe abortion practices.
1. Life expectancy
2. Educational attainment
3. Income levels
Step I: Calculate male and female indices separately for education, health, and income.
Step II: Combine them in a way that penalizes inequality.
Step III: Average the three adjusted indices to get GDI (range: 0 to 1).
India’s GDI score (2007/08) was 0.6, ranking 113 among 177 countries.
Definition:
● Political participation
● Economic participation
“Missing women” refers to girls/women who die prematurely due to neglect, discrimination,
or violence. Causes include:
Sex ratio disparities are evident: Kerala had the highest (1058 females/1000 males), while
northern states had low ratios.
● Domestic violence
● Rape
● Sexual harassment
● Dowry deaths
● Human trafficking
● Honour killings
Traditional practices like devadasi system and witchcraft accusations continue in some
regions.
○ Emergency contraception
○ Gender-sensitive advocacy
5. Strengthen Institutions:
6. Media Role:
Feminist movement
Feminism is a movement that fights for equal rights for women in politics, education, the
economy, and society. It believes that:
Men and women should be treated equally.
Violence against women should be stopped.
Women should have the freedom to make their own choices, including about their bodies and
lives.
Even though the word “feminism” became common in the 1970s, it was used earlier too. For
example, the 1942 film *Woman of the Year* used the term “feminist movement.”
Goals of Feminism:
Equal pay
Ending workplace discrimination
Access to education and reproductive healthcare
Key achievements:
By this time, most women around the world had the right to vote and could run for office.
Started because some felt the second wave didn’t represent all women—especially women of
color, LGBTQ+ women, and women from non-Western countries.
Focuses on diversity, individual freedom, and challenging traditional ideas of gender.
Talks about how race, class, and gender all affect a woman’s experience.
Some third-wave feminists believe there are real differences between men and women, while
others think these differences are caused by society, not nature.
Achievements:
1992 was called the “Year of the Woman” in the U.S.
Four women entered the U.S. Senate in 1992.
The Family and Medical Leave Act (1993) was passed.
Violence Against Women Act (1994) passed.
In 1995, the UN held a global women’s conference in Beijing.
Early Feminists:
Christine de Pizan (14th century): The first known female writer who stood up for women.
In the 17th and 18th centuries, people like Mary Wortley Montagu and Condorcet pushed for
women’s education.
Important Events:
1791: Olympe de Gouges wrote The Declaration of the Rights of Woman during the French
Revolution.
1792: Mary Wollstonecraft wrote A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, calling for equal
education and full citizenship for women.
1848: The first Women’s Rights Convention was held in New York.
J.S. Mill (inspired by his wife Harriet Taylor) wrote The Subjection of Women.
1776: New Jersey allowed women to vote (right later taken away).
1838: Pitcairn Islands allowed women to vote.
1893: New Zealand – First country to grant full voting rights to women.
1906: Finland – First country with a female member of parliament.
1913–1917: Norway, Denmark, Soviet Union, Canada allowed women’s voting rights.
1928: UK gave equal voting rights to women as men.
1947: Pakistan granted women the right to vote.
1984: Liechtenstein was one of the last to grant women voting rights.
Today, most countries allow women to vote, but this was made possible by a long, hard
struggle by women (and some men) over many years.
At the start of the 21st century, new ideas began to shape gender studies, especially with the
rise of issues like diversity, multiculturalism, and changing views of citizenship and
nationhood. Scholars started rethinking how women fit into modern society and how gender
equality should be understood in both academic and political spaces. At the same time, global
organizations began putting women’s empowerment—especially through economic
development—at the center of their agendas. This situation offers a unique chance to connect
gender research from both Western (richer) and non-Western (developing) parts of the world.
However, until now, there hasn’t been much interaction between these two traditions, which
limits the full potential of global gender education research.
In developed countries, gender researchers have worked on making education and workplaces
more equal, using tools like anti-sexist teaching and policies that support girls. Meanwhile,
researchers in developing countries are focused more on basic access to education for girls
and finding enough resources to support mass education. This has led to a divide: Western
researchers often use complex gender theories (from people like Judith Butler and Pierre
Bourdieu), while development studies don’t often include these ideas, possibly because they
are seen as too specific to Western history. As a result, gender and education research in
development has not grown as a strong global academic field. To bridge this gap, researchers
now suggest combining the strengths of both fields. Doing this would help students and
scholars understand gender in a wider, international context using new methods, like those
used in studies in India and Kenya. Recently published guides and books are also helping
learners understand gender analysis better and build connections between global gender and
development thinking.
Since the 1990s, global organizations like the United Nations have played a big role in
promoting gender equality in education. The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and
Dakar Declaration (2000) helped set clear goals for reducing poverty and improving
education for all, especially girls. These efforts made it easier to talk about gender issues in
education worldwide. However, these goals also raised concerns, as some people see them as
Western ideas being pushed onto other cultures.
Every country is different. For example, in South Asia, even with economic progress, girls’
education stayed low. In Latin America, being literate didn’t always lead to jobs. Cultural and
religious values, family traditions, and how society sees women all affect how gender and
education connect. Many changes in girls’ education actually come from NGOs (local and
international) instead of governments.
In many poor countries, schools and teachers don’t have enough support. Gender reforms
often happen outside schools, led by small groups or NGOs. There’s little research on how
these efforts actually affect girls’ lives, their learning, or their futures. Most studies only
report numbers like how many girls enroll in school—not how they learn or what they
achieve
To understand and improve gender education worldwide, we need better research that
includes both Western and non-Western views. Researchers must understand how local
politics, culture, and teaching methods affect girls. This book aims to study all these different
ideas and actions in gender education to support social justice around the world.
Since the 1970s, feminist ideas have shaped global efforts for gender equality.
Three key feminist approaches:
o WID (Women in Development): Focused on recognizing women’s unpaid
work and role in the economy using statistics.
o WAD (Women and Development): Showed that development and gender roles
affect each other.
o GAD (Gender and Development): Focused on gender as a power system
shaped by history, culture, and society.
Western feminism studied gender in rich countries, focusing on identity, roles, and
culture.
Non-Western feminists (Africa, India, Latin America) criticized this for ignoring
other power issues like race, caste, or age.
Concepts like “woman,” “man,” or “family” differ across cultures, so Western ideas
don’t always fit.
Some global goals like the MDGs were seen as imposing Western gender norms on
others.
Many declarations (like Beijing 1996) called education a human right for women.
UNESCO reports showed data on gender gaps but also exposed problems like lack of
female teachers and poor school funding.
Feminists now demand better indicators to measure real progress in women’s
empowerment—not just school attendance.
New and young researchers are joining this field, mixing theory and real-life stories
from communities.
Today, it’s important to include voices of poor and diverse women, not just global
policies or statistics.
The field now connects scholars from the Global North and South working for gender
justice through education.
Gender researchers now influence global reports, including on men’s role in gender
equality.
More people are interested in studying education and development together.
The field is growing and has strong potential to improve policies and lives.
The idea of gender education research has expanded over time to include both global policies
and local, everyday realities. Scholars now recognize that gender equality in education cannot
be understood through statistics alone, such as enrolment numbers. Instead, we must look at
how gender roles and identities are shaped by culture, community, family traditions, and
power structures. Global agencies like the UN have created frameworks like WID, WAD, and
GAD to guide gender development, but these often reflect Western ideas that may not fully
apply in non-Western settings. In many cases, meaningful change comes from small, local
actions—what some call “acts of citizenship”—like a girl attending school despite family
pressure or a female teacher challenging community norms. These everyday gender
performances help move society toward equality, even when large systems do not fully
support it.
Many studies now focus on how women and girls experience gender in specific local settings,
including rural schools, religious communities, or poor urban areas. For example, research in
Tajikistan shows how historical and cultural conditions affect gender relations and access to
education. In East Africa, young people discuss how gender, sexuality, and the HIV/AIDS
crisis shape their lives. In Ghana and Bangladesh, the roles of women teachers are shown to
be important symbols of empowerment. These women are not just educators—they challenge
gender norms and serve their communities. The research also highlights how women use their
voices and social roles creatively to bring change, often in quiet but powerful ways. Gender
equality, then, is not just about access to school, but about empowerment, respect, and voice.
Finally, gender education is deeply connected to broader issues like poverty, nation-building,
and globalization. In countries like India and Ghana, international agendas such as the MDGs
and Education for All have shaped national education policies. But these policies often ignore
deep-rooted inequalities and focus too much on numbers, like enrolment targets. Feminist
organizations, especially in Latin America, have found alternative ways to promote change—
through adult learning, community-based programs, and informal education spaces. These
efforts show that true gender equality requires understanding how education interacts with
politics, economics, and cultural beliefs. Overall, gender education research is now moving
toward more inclusive and locally grounded approaches that consider real-life struggles,
identities, and power dynamics affecting women and men.
Gender and sex are distinctly different terms. Sex refers to the biological differences between
men and women, and specifically to biological, physiological and anatomical features.
Gender connotes the socially established set of identities, attributes, and roles for women and
men in a given culture.
What’s meant by “gender norms” and how does this relate to policymaking?
Gender norms are the standards and expectations to which women and men generally
conform within a particular society, culture and community. Policy interventions should
analyze gender norms to determine how they shape and influence gender roles and whether
they contribute to greater gender equality or intensify an imbalance of power.
Gender analysis is the study of differences between women and men in their assigned gender
roles in terms of their conditions, needs, participation rates, access to resources, and
development, control of assets, and decision-making roles. Gender analysis is critical not
only at the onset of the process of designing a policy intervention, but it is also important
throughout the policymaking and implementation process. It is important to allow for
periodic opportunities to review, analyze and reflect on the gender dimensions to ensure
gender remains a priority throughout the policy initiative. Without ongoing gender analysis, it
will not be possible to develop and sustain a gender-responsive policy.
A gender-responsive policy takes into account both women’s and men’s interests and needs.
It is an inclusive policy that also considers the unique needs of subgroups within the
dominant framework of gender (for example, the youth; the elderly; people with disabilities;
the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex community; ethnic and religious
minorities, indigenous groups). Policies can be either gender specific (for example, a policy
to promote gender equality in Parliament) or a gender-integrated policy (for example, a
policy on natural resource management that includes elements specific to women’s and men’s
needs).
Gender integration is the process of assessing the implications for women and men of any
planned action, including legislation, in all areas and at all levels. Integrating an
understanding of gender should be the responsibility of all who are involved in the
policymaking process as it is relevant for all policy areas. This may include issues that on
their surface may not seem relevant but — after a gender analysis — may have consequences
or elements that perpetuate gender inequality or have differential impact on certain subgroups
of the population.
How can international norms and legal frameworks support gender integration?
There are many international frameworks that promote gender integration and gender
equality, including international conventions, treaties and resolutions that can be used to
integrate gender into policymaking and promote gender equality. The following are some of
the most significant:
The first step in making a policy is to clearly understand and explain the problem and what
you want to achieve. Right from the beginning, it’s important to look at the issue through a
“gender lens” – this means thinking about how it might affect women and men differently.
To do this, you need to carry out a gender analysis. This helps you find out the different roles,
needs, and power differences between men and women. Without this step, you may miss
important information and your policy may not fully support gender equality.
After the gender analysis, you can set your goal – the big change you want to make with the
policy. This goal should reflect how the issue affects women and men in different ways and
should also aim to improve gender equality overall.
Phase two of making a policy is about using gender analysis while collecting information to
help design your policy in a way that supports gender equality.
Collecting this information takes time and may change as you learn more. By using a gender
lens, you can better understand what shapes the issue and how it affects men and women
differently. This helps you create a stronger policy that solves the problem more effectively.
Step 1: Understand the policy context – This means learning what policies already exist and
who has the power to change or influence them. There are some helpful tools to do this:
1. Environmental Scan:
This means listing the people and groups who are involved or affected by the policy.
It helps you see:
Look at the barriers (what can stop the policy) and opportunities (what can help it).
How does the policy address the different interests and needs of women and men?
Does the policy explicitly address the gender dimensions of the issue in its definition
of the problem?
Does the policy include gender-neutral language that could lead to the exclusion of
women?
THIRD: Develop your policy intervention. At this stage, you should be able to decide
whether you are drafting a new policy, amending an existing policy or developing policy
recommendations. When considering which course of action to take, keep in mind:
Always ask how gender is taken into account within each component of the policy, including
in the:
Background
Goal
Objectives
Outcomes
Activities
Beneficiaries
Indicators
Implementation plan
Monitoring and evaluation
Budget
Annexes
Communication strategy
Think about what resources you will need to make your policy successful. A key part of this
is creating a gender-responsive budget (GRB) — a budget that supports both women’s and
men’s needs and helps promote gender equality. This ensures your policy has the funding it
needs to reach its goals in a fair and inclusive way.
A GRB shows how money is being used to reduce gender gaps in government plans, policies,
and spending. It helps track progress, challenges gender stereotypes, and focuses on the needs
of the most disadvantaged groups. GRBs also make sure that money is spent where it is really
needed, and they make the process more open and responsible.
This phase is about taking action together to support your policy. It includes strategies like
gathering support, shaping your message, and making a communication plan that considers
gender.
FIRST: Choose Your Advocacy Tactics
These are the methods or steps you will take to reach your goal. There are two main types of
advocacy:
Constructive Approach: This uses teamwork and cooperation to find solutions and
achieve the goal.
Confrontational Approach: This uses challenge or pressure to push for change and
reach the goal.
CONSTRUCTIVE APPROACH
CONFRONTATIONAL APPROACH
Advocacy is more powerful when many different people and groups support it. Teaming up
with a variety of individuals and organizations can help you:
Before getting support for your policy, you need to know who supports you (allies) and who
may oppose you. It’s important to have a diverse group of supporters so your campaign is
strong and includes voices from people affected by the issue.
Networks are made up of people or groups who work together in a flexible and
informal way.
Coalitions are more organized groups of organizations that work together for the
same goal.
Allies are individuals, organizations and institutions that can help you achieve your
policy goal. Make sure your allies have a commitment to gender equality.
Opponents are individuals, organizations and institutions that resist the change you
are seeking to achieve.
These partnerships can be long-term or short-term, formal or informal, and can focus on one
issue or many.
To get support for your policy, think about what will interest and motivate different people to
join your cause. Everyone has their own priorities, so explain clearly how your policy will
benefit them and why it’s worth their time. One of the best ways to gain support is by
building strong personal relationships. Talk to potential allies, share your goals, and invite
them to be part of your campaign. Trust and good communication can help bring people
together for your advocacy efforts. Some ways to develop trusting relationships include:
Involving men in gender and policy work is important but often overlooked. Since men
usually hold more leadership roles, including them can make advocacy efforts stronger and
more effective. Ignoring male allies can reduce the impact of your policy and may even
continue gender inequality.
To engage men, help them see how harmful gender norms affect both men and women. Show
them how gender equality can benefit families and communities, and encourage them to
support the cause and involve others.
It’s also essential to gain support from the people who will be most affected by your policy.
Policy change takes time, so building trust and understanding in the community is key for
long-term success.
THIRD: Craft your message. Effective messaging is tailored to your audience and inspires
them to join you. Your audience includes individuals, organizations or institutions that can
push your policy intervention forward.
1. Policymakers – These are the people who will introduce, support, and approve your
policy. They also help make sure it gets implemented.
2. Allies and Influencers – These are individuals or groups who can help you by
convincing the policymakers to support your policy.
After learning about your audience, craft your message. Your message should convey:
This phase focuses on building a gender-responsive plan to guide how the policy will be put
into action, tracked, and improved. It includes planning for implementation, collecting data,
analyzing progress, and making changes as needed.
First: create a gender-responsive implementation plan. This means clearly stating which
activities include gender considerations so that gender integration can be monitored properly
throughout the process.
Second: Create a gender-sensitive monitoring framework. This helps track how well your
policy is being carried out and whether it’s meeting its gender equality goals. Monitoring
should be ongoing so you can spot challenges early and make changes when needed.
1. Make sure goals, results, and activities mention the expected impact on women, men,
girls, and boys.
2. Add specific objectives and actions that promote gender equality, like improving
women’s access to services or resources.
You should collect and review your data every three months to check if your project is
working well. Focus on the gender-related information to see if there are any gaps between
men and women.
If you find any gender gaps, do a gender analysis to understand the reasons behind them.
Then, make changes to fix the problems and improve gender equality in your project.
It also helps to hold discussion sessions with team members and community leaders. These
meetings can show which parts of the project are working and which need improvement.
This step is about looking back and asking, “How did we do?” It’s time to review the whole
project and see what worked well and what didn’t.
You should write down what you learned and what good methods or ideas you used so you
can do even better next time.
Make sure your evaluation focuses on gender — check if your project helped improve
equality between men and women. You might need to bring in a gender expert to help with
this review.
When writing down lessons learned, include the problems you faced, any gender gaps that
remained, and how some actions helped fix gender issues. This helps others learn from your
experience.
After you finish the evaluation, think about sharing it with others. Making it public can help
others learn and improve their own policies. Your findings may help create new policies or
improve old ones.
Also, think about how your policy connects to the larger gender equality goals. If there were
successes, share them so they can be used in other projects or made bigger.
Many gender-related policies work alone and are not shared widely. Gender analysis is often
left out. Your goal should be to make it a regular and important part of all policy work.