Computational Statistics
Survey Report: Display and User Experience
of SIAKAD Polinema
06.22.25
─
Agna Putra Prawira - 2341720065/01
Kevin Bramasta Arvyto Wardhana - 2341720233/13
Muhammad Farhan Fahraby - 2341720188/18
Muhammad Tegar Hibatulloh - 2341720221/21
Sherly Lutfi Azkiah S - 2341720241/23
Politeknik Negeri Malang
Department of Information Technology
D-IV Informatics
1
METHODOLOGY
Research Approach
This study employed a quantitative research method through a descriptive survey. Data
was collected using an online questionnaire designed to measure user perceptions across
several dimensions of user experience.
Data Collection
Instrument: An online questionnaire was created using Google Forms.
Distribution: The form was distributed to Polinema students via online channels.
Survey Period: The data was collected from [Start Date, e.g., June 15, 2025] to [End Date,
e.g., June 21, 2025].
Survey Instrument
User Experience Metrics: A series of statements rated on a 5-point Likert scale, where:
● 1 = Strongly Disagree
● 2 = Disagree
● 3 = Neutral
● 4 = Agree
● 5 = Strongly Agree
RESULTS AND ANALYSIS
Quantitative Analysis (User Experience Metrics)
The following list summarizes the mean scores for key user experience aspects of SIAKAD
Polinema.
Visual Design & Aesthetics
● Statement: Is the visual display attractive?
○ Mean Score: 2.63
○ Interpretation: Neutral / Mixed
● Statement: Is the UI design professional and modern?
○ Mean Score: 2.57
2
○ Interpretation: Slightly Negative
● Statement: Are the colors comfortable on the eyes?
○ Mean Score: 3.18
○ Interpretation: Neutral / Mixed
● Statement: Is the font easy to read?
○ Mean Score: 3.45
○ Interpretation: Neutral / Mixed
● Statement: Is the UI display consistent across pages?
○ Mean Score: 3.12
○ Interpretation: Neutral / Mixed
● Statement: Is the login page neat and informative?
○ Mean Score: 3.16
○ Interpretation: Neutral / Mixed
Usability & Navigation
● Statement: Is the layout of menus and buttons well-organized?
○ Mean Score: 3.02
○ Interpretation: Neutral / Mixed
● Statement: I find it easy to use the features.
○ Mean Score: 3.20
○ Interpretation: Neutral / Mixed
● Statement: Navigation between pages is easy to understand.
○ Mean Score: 3.49
○ Interpretation: Neutral / Mixed
● Statement: Is access to grade and schedule information very easy?
○ Mean Score: 3.35
○ Interpretation: Neutral / Mixed
Performance & Reliability
● Statement: Does the KRS process run smoothly and clearly?
○ Mean Score: 3.14
○ Interpretation: Neutral / Mixed
● Statement: Is SIAKAD accessible smoothly from various devices?
○ Mean Score: 2.76
○ Interpretation: Neutral / Mixed
● Statement: Is the LMS in SIAKAD accessible smoothly and easily?
○ Mean Score: 2.41
○ Interpretation: Slightly Negative
● Statement: Does the system not experience frequent disruptions?
○ Mean Score: 2.37
3
○ Interpretation: Slightly Negative
Overall Satisfaction
● Statement: Overall, I am satisfied with the SIAKAD application. (Calculated Average
of all questions)
○ Mean Score: 2.99
○ Interpretation: Neutral / Mixed
Prerequisite Analysis: Normality and Homogeneity Testing
Before analyzing the primary survey data, a series of prerequisite statistical tests were
conducted to ensure the validity of subsequent analyses. The data was subjected to
normality, homogeneity, and ANOVA tests.
1. Normality Test
To determine if the data sample was drawn from a normally distributed population,
several methods were employed as outlined in the analysis notebook, including the
Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors, and Chi-squared tests.
2. Homogeneity of Variance Test
A Levene's test was conducted to determine if the variance between different data
groups was equal (homogeneous). The results were as follows:
● Levene's Test Statistic: 1.438
● p-value: 0.2304
Since the p-value (0.2304) is greater than the standard alpha level of 0.05, it is
concluded that there is no significant difference in variance between the groups.
Therefore, the data meet the assumption of homogeneity.
3. ANOVA One-Way Test
An ANOVA test was performed to compare the means of the different groups. The
result indicated that with a p-value greater than the alpha of 0.05, the groups are
considered homogeneous. This reinforces the findings from Levene's test.
