Theorem:
If x≥4x≥4, then 2x≥x22x≥x2.
Proof:
We analyze the inequality by taking logarithms and comparing growth rates.
Step 1: Take the Natural Logarithm of Both Sides
To compare 2x2x and x2x2, consider the equivalent inequality:
2x≥x2 ⟹ xln(2)≥2ln(x).2x≥x2⟹xln(2)≥2ln(x).
Let:
f(x)=xln(2)−2ln(x).f(x)=xln(2)−2ln(x).
We must show f(x)≥0f(x)≥0 for x≥4x≥4.
Step 2: Analyze f(x)f(x) Using Calculus
1. Compute f(4)f(4):
f(4)=4ln(2)−2ln(4)=4ln(2)−4ln(2)=0.f(4)=4ln(2)−2ln(4)=4ln(2)−4ln(2)=0.
2. Compute the derivative f′(x)f′(x):
f′(x)=ln(2)−2x.f′(x)=ln(2)−x2.
o For x≥4x≥4:
f′(x)=ln(2)−2x≥ln(2)−24≈0.693−0.5=0.193>0.f′(x)=ln(2)−x2≥ln(2)−42≈0.693−0.5=0.193>0.
o Thus, f′(x)>0f′(x)>0 for all x≥4x≥4, meaning f(x)f(x) is strictly
increasing for x≥4x≥4.
3. Conclusion from Monotonicity:
o Since f(4)=0f(4)=0 and f(x)f(x) is increasing for x≥4x≥4, it follows that:
f(x)≥0∀x≥4.f(x)≥0∀x≥4.
o Therefore, xln(2)≥2ln(x)xln(2)≥2ln(x), which implies:
2x≥x2∀x≥4.2x≥x2∀x≥4.
Step 3: Verify the Growth Rate Dominance
The derivative f′(x)=ln(2)−2xf′(x)=ln(2)−x2 shows that the gap
between 2x2x and x2x2 widens as xx increases:
o At x=4x=4, f′(x)≈0.193>0f′(x)≈0.193>0.
o As x→∞x→∞, f′(x)→ln(2)≈0.693>0f′(x)→ln(2)≈0.693>0.
This confirms that 2x2x grows exponentially faster than x2x2 for x≥4x≥4.
Final Conclusion:
By analyzing the logarithmic inequality and proving that f(x)f(x) is strictly increasing for (