0% found this document useful (0 votes)
55 views26 pages

7 Formation Damage

Chapter 7 discusses formation damage (FD) in petroleum engineering, detailing its causes, mechanisms, and impacts on well performance. It covers the identification of susceptible areas, calculation of production losses, and various remedial treatments. The chapter also addresses scale deposition, methods for minimizing formation damage, and techniques for its removal and flow assurance.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
55 views26 pages

7 Formation Damage

Chapter 7 discusses formation damage (FD) in petroleum engineering, detailing its causes, mechanisms, and impacts on well performance. It covers the identification of susceptible areas, calculation of production losses, and various remedial treatments. The chapter also addresses scale deposition, methods for minimizing formation damage, and techniques for its removal and flow assurance.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

27/01/2019

Chapter 7
Formation Damage

Khafiz Muradov

Institute of Petroleum Engineering, EGIS School, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, U.K.

Learning Objectives

• Explain when and how formation damage contributes to poor well performance.

• Identify the crucial near wellbore area susceptible to formation damage.

• Calculate the loss of production due to formation damage

• Explain the mechanisms of formation damage

• Identify the major sources of formation damage.

• Select appropriate remedial treatments.

• Discuss the causes of production, drilling, completion, and production related formation damage

• Identify the types of scale encountered in well operations.

• State the scope, underlying cause and remedial action required to deal with scale deposition
problem.

• Provide guidelines for minimising formation damage during well operations.

• Indicate how the formation damage can be identified in a production or injection well.

• Discuss the methods used in the formation damage removal and flow assurance.

1
27/01/2019

Pressure Change in the Near-wellbore Zone

Formation Damage

 Formation Damage (FD) reduces the permeability of the reservoir rock


in the near wellbore area
– One component of the “well skin”
 FD can start as soon as the drill bit enters the formation
 FD has many sources resulting in:
– Pore (especially) throat Blockage (Absolute Permeability) &
– Wettability changes (Relative Permeability)
 Solutions:
– Chapter 8 (Matrix Stimulation) discusses how to reduce or remove
Formation Damage
– Chapter 9 (Hydraulic Fracturing) discusses how to bypass
Formation Damage

2
27/01/2019

Well Inflow Pressure Profiles with/without Skin

For a Constant Flow Rate

Formation Damage Skin


STotal  SFD  SGeometry  SCompletion  SPr oduction

Formation Damage and other types of skin

STotal  SFD  SGeometry  SCompletion  SPr oduction


 Well geometry
– limited entry/partial penetration/off-centre well placement(+)
– well deviation / slanted well (-)
 Completion
– perforations {flow convergence / crushed zone)} (+ or -)
– gravel packs (+) / natural or hydraulic fractures (-)
 Production
– non-Darcy effects / turbulence (+, rate dependent)
– relative perm. effects (+)
– pressure dependent phase (gas & condensate) behavior (+)
 Formation Damage
– only form of “+ve skin” which can be chemically removed

3
27/01/2019

Formation Damage - Modeling


Pd 2 kh  k  r 
Hawkins Equation: Sd    1 ln d 
q  kd   rw 

Flow Efficiency

• Sideal includes all   re


ln  
  Sideal 

  rw    100%
skin sources apart FE 

ln
re 
  STotal
from Formation  rw 
Damage Optional class activity:
 Tutorial 1

4
27/01/2019

Formation Damage Mechanisms

 Plugging and bridging of pores by solid


particles
 Chemical Precipitation
 Bacteria
 Fluids
 Mechanical Damage and Rock
Compaction

10

Formation Damage - Filter Cake Formation

5
27/01/2019

11
Formation Damage - Fines Movement

Immobile fines

12

Formation Damage - Fines Movement

Water wet fines become mobile with water production

6
27/01/2019

13
Formation Damage due to fines:
dispersed clay particles

Clay-related damage effects include:


- Clay swelling
- Clay dispersion

Can be initiated by:


- Increase in water saturation
- Change of fluid composition
- Fluid flow

Formation Damage - Scale

 Scale precipitation results from a chemical


instability caused by changing conditions due to
the production process
 Temperature reduction
 Pressure reduction
 Mixing incompatible waters & hydrocarbons

7
27/01/2019

Formation Damage - Inorganic Scales

 Scale type ( N.B. Pressure triggered phenomena are self aggravating)


Ca (HCO3)2 CaCO3 + CO2 +H2O (P,T changes)
++
Ca + SO4 -- CaSO4 (P,T changes)
++
Ba + SO4 -- BaSO4 (mixing)
also SrSO4, NaCl, S etc.

Formation Damage – Wax (Paraffin)

 Between 1 & 50%wt. wax, a long chain (C18-C60) linear


molecule, dissolved in crude oil at reservoir temperature
 Precipitates as a soft / brittle solid when temperature
reduced below cloud point (Pressure has minor effect)

8
27/01/2019

Formation Damage - Asphaltenes


 Amorphous (non-crystalline), bituminous solid consisting of high molecular
weight asphaltenes / maltenes / resins that precipitate from some crude oils
 Originally present in the form of a “metastable, colloidal dispersion” in the
crude oil
 Precipitation triggered by pressure changes
– Can occur above the bubble point
 Found in specific part of well facilities at a given time
– Precipitation point will change with time
 Seldom causes formation damage

Asphaltene precipitation process

Formation Damage- Bacteria

Typically found in injection wells & projects


 Bacterial Slime
– Bacterial cellular remnants
– Physical plugging of pores etc.

 Sulphate Reducing Bacteria (Anaerobic)


– SRB + SO4-- (sea water) H2S
– Safety and corrosion issue
– FeS precipitation

 Iron Bacteria (aerobic)


– Iron Bacteria grow under iron deposit
– Causes corrosion (pitting)

9
27/01/2019

Formation Damage - Fluids

 Surfactants can change wettability and promote oil-


water emulsion forming

 Crude oil and acid can form sludges


 Increase in water saturation -> water block

20
Formation Damage due to Water Block

10
27/01/2019

21

Formation Damage due to introduction of a third phase

Formation Damage Sources

 Drilling
 Cementing
 Perforating
 Completion / Gravel Packing
 Production
 Injection
 Workover
 Stimulation

11
27/01/2019

Formation Damage - Drilling Operations

 Formation Damage commences as soon as drill bit enters the Pay


Zone

 Above the Pay Zone

– Choose drilling fluid to minimise Drilling Cost (drill fast)

 In the Pay Zone

– Choose drilling fluid to minimise Formation Damage

Drill in drilling muds

12
27/01/2019

Ideal Filter Cake Formation

• Low permeability filter cake forms at the borehole wall


• Rapid filter cake formation & use of correctly sized particles in
the drilling mud restricts:
- Particle & Fluid invasion into the Formation
- Formation Damage

Formation/ Filter Cake Permeability


ratio controls the Fluid-Loss Process

13
27/01/2019

Formation Damage - Drilling Impairment

 Formation Damage Depth controlled by:


– Drilling Mud type
– Open hole time
– Pressure Overbalance
– Borehole dynamics that increase fluid loss:
 Large Bottom Hole Assembly (BHA)
 Changes to BHA
 High circulation rates

Fluid Loss during the Drilling Process

14
27/01/2019

Fluid Loss & Invasion Depth

Wellbore radius 10.8 cm, Perforated interval 15.5 m

• Fluid Invasion Depth & Formation Damage Depth are not the same, but are often related
• Resistivity Logging Tools measure Fluid Invasion Depth
Causes damage by:
- Water block
- Extra phase
- Wettability change (by surfactants)
- Precipitation if incompatible fluids
- Clay swelling and fines dispersion
(addition of 1-3% wt potassium chloride (KCl) or ammonia chloride (NH4Cl) help)
- Polymer absorption

Underbalance Drilling

 Underbalance Drilling avoids formation Damage from the Drilling


Fluid
 Improvement depends on formation type and reservoir pressure

15
27/01/2019

31

Formation Damage due to polymers from wellbore fluids

Formation impairment due to Polymer Absorption from the drilling mud

Formation Damage - Filter Cake Formation

 Particle invasion into formations:


– Forms a surface cake good
– Adheres to pore surface
– Plugs pore throats bad
 Filter cake formation process depends on Particle/ Formation
size ratio & particle concentration
– Impermeable surface mud cake allows only limited leak off, hence
remains thin
Efficient filter cake

16
27/01/2019

Formation Damage
Particle Invasion and Damage (Abrams Rule)

 Filter Cake Formation depends on:


pore throat size (dpt) / particle diameter of the solids (d)

A wide range of particle sizes encourages efficient filter cake formation

Formation Damage - Invasion Profile

Optional class activity:


 Tutorial 2

17
27/01/2019

‘Formation Damage’ due to drilling not on-gauge

Formation Damage - Cementing

 Washes & Spacers


– Destroys mud cake with dispersant additives
– Filtrate invasion - inches due to limited volume

 Cement Slurries Fluid Loss


– Reactive to clays (high pH)
– Precipitation of CaCO3 / lime /Ca silicates
– BUT fluid loss control essential for cementing success
– Shallow damage, can be bypassed by perforations

 Cement loss into natural fractures

18
27/01/2019

Formation Damage During Production/Injection

 Many Sources of Formation Damage can occur while


well is on production
– Fines Movement
– Use of incompatible work over fluids
– Inorganic & Organic Scale formation
– Bacteria
– Stimulation
– Pressure reduction leading to introduction of third phase

Formation Damage – Fines Movement

 Fines movement controlled by:


– Concentration & nature of fines
– Fluid velocity & Wettability (fluid phase, surfactants)
 Controlled by slow bean up or by chemical treatments

19
27/01/2019

Formation Damage - Filtration Requirements

Formation Damage - Water Injection

 Formation Impairment due to oil and solids (also corrosion


products, precipitation, bacteria etc.)
 Filtration requirements depend on water quality
 Tubing corrosion reduced via inhibition and / or primary
oxygen removal & scavenging treatments
 (Thermal) fracturing increases “well” surface area by use
of cold water or high pressure injection
 Produced Water Re-Injection often more problematic
(higher water temperatures & oil present)

20
27/01/2019

Formation Damage - Workover fluid guidelines (1)

 Filter fluid to remove undissolved (micro) gel residues as


well as particles larger than 1/3 dpt
 LCM with correct particle size for formation
 Minimise contamination from pipe dope, millscale etc
– Clean dirt, scale and mud residue from tanks, lines,
pumps, tubulars etc. prior to use
– Use dedicated tanks/workstring for gravel packing &
acidising where fluid loss to formation is normally high
 Add adequate breaker to all viscous fluids
 Minimise overbalance - 200 psi

Formation Damage
Workover techniques can avoid Formation Damage
• Use well records to identify fractures, loss rate, best type of kill pill
• Isolation of the production interval mechanically, using LCM, kill pill, etc.

21
27/01/2019

Formation Damage- Pressure Reduction

Pressure reduction can trigger:


– Inorganic and asphaltene scales

– Increased formation effective stress


 formation failure / sand production
 compaction of producing interval
 fault reactivation
 formation permeability reduction

– Multiphase flow effects:


 below bubble or dew points
 retrograde condensation

 leads to reduced (relative) permeability

Formation Damage Monitoring and Identification

• Production logging (spinner, WC, …)


• Fluid sampling (and subsequent tests)
• Well records
• Core tests

22
27/01/2019

Formation Damage Removal and Flow Assurance

 Emulsions

 Mineral Scales

 Waxes

 Asphaltenes

 Gas hydrates

Emulsion

 De-emulsifiers
 Mutual solvents
 Eliminate the forming conditions:
– Change restrictions or the pump
– Isolate watered zones

23
27/01/2019

Inorganic Scales
 Drill Out or erode with special slurry – well. Re-perforate

 Dissolve - formation / well / facilities

– NaCl (water), CaCO3 (HCl acid), BaSO4 (very difficult)

 Inhibit - formation / well / facilities – continuous or squeeze treatment


– preferred technique
– change kinetics of crystal growth, NOT Thermodynamics

 Stay out of P/T where scales form


– Control of pressure or insulation

 Avoid mixing of waters


– Reservoir management
– Produced/aquifer water re-injection

 Treatment of injected water (expensive)

Wax

 Precipitation best prevented by keeping crude oil warm –


difficult for deep water, subsea wells with long flow lines &
sea temperature < 4oC)

 Remedies:- Inhibitors, Insulation,


Heating etc.

 Removal: mechanical (scraping),


hot oil(ing), solvents

24
27/01/2019

Asphaltenes

 Mechanical removal from well and facilities required


 Formation damage rarely observed
 Poorly soluble in solvents
 Precipitation can also triggered by acid, particularly if it
contains Fe+++

Gas Hydrates

 Ice-like solids
 Form at high P and relatively low T
 Inhibition (methanol, glycol, etc.)
 Thermal insulation / heating
 (Export or gas lift) Gas dehydration
 Depressurization should be done with care

25
27/01/2019

Appendix A
Common Damage Types

Condition or Type of Damage Diagnostic Clues Remedial


hydrates (ice) gas well, intermittent flow, near total glycol or alcohol injection below hydrate
shutoff, followed by return to flow in a formation point. Insulated risers or tubing.
few minutes; produces a small amount of
water
oil well, usually only forms near mud line insulated risers
in arctic regions; may also form in drilling
mud
migrating fines kaolinite or fibrous illite clay or some clay control for prevention, retarded acid
feldspars (non clays); brine salinity for removal; may need to limit rate in
changes may trigger fines movement; extreme case
sporadic reductions in flow rate, variable
production rate tests; fines in prod,
emulsions rare but possible
swelling clay smectite clay, sometimes illite and acidize with HCI/HF if damage is shallow
smectite interbedded clay; permeability is Hydraulic Fracture if damage is deeper
sensitive to change in water salinity or than 12"
brine type
water blocks usually gas well, small pore throats, matrix treat with alcohol or surface tension
untreated water, low pressure formation; if lowering surfactant; inject gas in gas
very low pressure (< about 0.2 psi/ft), pore reservoir to distance of 10 ft
throat size doesn’t matter
poor load fluid rec. usually formation dependent; may Prevention - avoid or minimize water
decrease production rate in severe cases or contact and lower surface tension of water.
cause long cleanup time. Most common in Removal - alcohols and some surfactants
formations with small pores and
microporous clays

Learning Objectives

• Explain when and how formation damage contributes to poor well performance.

• Identify the crucial near wellbore area susceptible to formation damage.

• Calculate the loss of production due to formation damage

• Explain the mechanisms of formation damage

• Identify the major sources of formation damage.

• Select appropriate remedial treatments.

• Discuss the causes of production, drilling, completion, and production related formation damage

• Identify the types of scale encountered in well operations.

• State the scope, underlying cause and remedial action required to deal with scale deposition
problem.

• Provide guidelines for minimising formation damage during well operations.

• Indicate how the formation damage can be identified in a production or injection well.

• Discuss the methods used in the formation damage removal and flow assurance.

26

You might also like