ALGORITHM DEVELOPMENT FOR HYDROGEN

FUEL CELL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Kishore S M Dr.J.Florence Gnana Poovathy

School of Electronics Engineering School of Electronics Engineering
Vellore Institute of Technology Vellore Institute of Technology
Chennai, India Chennai, India
[email protected] [email protected]

Abstract- Hydrogen fuel cells are a new and emerging field for The algorithm continuously finds the best control mechanisms under
sustainable energy systems with high efficiency and environmentally various conditions of driving by applying general operators such as
friendly emissions. Successful control of hydrogen fuel cells depends selection, crossover, and mutation. It also discusses the application GA in
on the necessity of accurate algorithms that would manage and multi-objective optimization that enables an FCHV to make concessions
monitor the operation of the fuel cell and solve issues related to the between opposing goals such as the quality of power supply or battery life.
efficiency of fuel, temperature regulation, and energy output. This Simulation test developments note the effectiveness of a genetic algorithm
article presents a novel algorithmic solution to enhance functionality in rival real-time contexts.
and reliability in hydrogen fuel cell management systems. The system
enhances the performance of fuel cells, minimizes wastage, and Huang[3]. discusses the multi-objective optimization methods for proton
maximizes energy distribution based on dynamic load requirements exchange membrane fuel cells. They are well suited for application in
through designing and simulating control algorithms. automobiles with high power density, low operating temperature, and
quick response. Although PEMFCs are highly efficient, certain of the
I. INTRODUCTION parameters such as pressure, temperature and flow rates of reactants must
be controlled very precisely to keep the performance level intact. Huang
Over the past few years, hydrogen fuel cells have been among the top uses AI-MOO as a method by machine learning and multi-objective
players in sustainable energy research as they are efficient and zero- optimization methods that offer auto parameter tuning.
emission compared to fossil fuels. Hydrogen fuel cells are applied in all
industries, ranging from the transport sector to power generation, but III. METHODOLOGY
day-to-day operations are handled by top-level management systems to
provide fuel efficiency, temperature regulation, and uninterrupted power
supply. A highly efficient Hydrogen Fuel Cell Management System
(HFCMS) is needed to address the problem types. This paper proposes
an algorithm to maximize the efficiency of hydrogen fuel cells by
optimizing fuel usage, maintaining temperatures at optimal values, and
stabilizing energy output. Simulated and tested on MATLAB/Simulink,
the algorithm has the potential for promising performance in increasing
system efficiency and reliability, and provides scope for extended
applications of hydrogen fuel cells in clean energy technologies.

II. LITERATURE REVIEW

Pasupuleti[1]. summarizes various energy management approaches and

control strategies that real-time optimize the efficiency of hydrogen fuel
cell electric vehicles. The importance of applying AI to handle intricate
dynamics related to fuel cell systems under various load cases is
highlighted in this paper. These HFCEVs should be feasible options for
reducing greenhouse gas emissions toward a zero-emission transportation
system envisioned by future climate policy. It explores multi-objective
optimization techniques that work in the direction of different performance
objectives: energy efficiency, operation stability, and fuel cell life.

Furthermore, hybrid control approaches involving both rule-based and

heuristic algorithms improve response to fluctuations in power demand
and help to avoid wasting energy.

Wang[2]. Presents a proper overview of GAs used to optimize FCHV’s

energy management system. GAs can prove helpful as they are heuristic
and general optimizers and hence capable of solving complex problems
with multiple variables related to managing energy in power hybrid
systems. Wang’s paper explores applying GAs for searching optimum
patterns in energy distribution with the minimum amount of fuel to be Fig (1). Load Regulation and Performance Monitoring
used, reducing emissions, and efficiency on the whole by FCHVs.
It employs high-fidelity hydrogen fuel cell power management with several
blocks of fuel cell stack as primary power sources. System monitoring and
adaptive control are achieved through bus selector, Bus Creator, and
Current/Voltage Measurement blocks to ensure maximum power regulation
and distribution. The system employs DC-DC Converter blocks in
conjunction with Discrete Transfer Function Filters to stabilize and regulate
the output voltage. A PID Controller dynamically controls the operating
parameters to ensure stable performance under dynamic load conditions.

For improved data integrity and transmission reliability, BCH

Encoder/Decoder blocks are used, preventing errors in communication.
Performance testing and load testing are supported through Series RLC
Load banks, mimicking actual operational conditions. Organized data
acquisition and processing are done through Bus Creator and Bus Selector
components, allowing for thorough analysis of stack consumption,
exchange current density, and utilization factor. Scope blocks give real-
time display of system parameters, allowing for effective energy
management, stable power output,and long-term operation reliablity of
the hydrogen fuel cell system.

Fig (3). Current

The curve indicates the current output of a hydrogen fuel cell system against
a time period normalized between 0 and 1 decreasing smoothly from some
initial positive level close to 0.5 A to 0. The implication is that the current
output is falling progressively, and the reason could be decreasing load
requirement, lack of fuel or oxidant supply, loss of efficiency, or stabilizing
system performance. In the Load Regulation and Performance Monitoring
system environment (Fig a), this plot is likely tracking the response of the
current measurement block routed through the Bus Selector and shown on a
Scope. The small current dip shows a stable system with a slight reduction in
power output, possibly due to scheduled regulation or natural fuel cell
behavior with time.

Fig (2). Flow Rate (lpm[Air(Yellow); Fuel(Magneta)]

The Flow Rate plot (Air in Yellow, Fuel in Magneta) indicates that the
hydrogen fuel cell system is operating under stable, controlled flow
conditions. It can be observed from the plot that both the air and fuel flow
rates are constant with time, without any observable oscillations or
transients. Specifically, the air flow rate is maintained slightly lower
(around 5.3 lpm) compared to the fuel flow rate (around 1.5 lpm), which
is somewhat unorthodox fuel cells typically use more air (oxygen) than
fuel (hydrogen).

But this plot might suggest a test setup wherein air and fuel are manually
regulated at fixed levels—maybe for some particular test profile or to simplify
the control logic while in the experimental phase. Absence of dynamic
variation may mean maybe the system is not permitted to respond to real time
load variation, or maybe the load itself is static. This would be in line with the
Load Regulation and Performance Monitoring model, where control blocks
like the PID controller, MinMax blocks, and Bus selectors will typically be
keeping things stable for testing stack behavior under steady-state conditions.

In effect, this chart concludes that the system places more emphasis on stead-
state testing or control calibration, and continuous flow rates provide a
sufficient basis for research on the electrical performance, efficiency, and
utilization of the fuel cell stack under those specified conditions.
Fig (4). Slope of Tafel Curve

The line on the graph is green at ( y = 0 ), so it has zero slope throughout

the range. The "Slope of Tafel curve" title suggests that the graph is a
derivative of the Tafel curve with respect to some variable, like
overpotential or current density. A zero slope implies that the Tafel curve
slope is stable and hence not changing and in a stationary or steady state.
Compared to Fig. (a), in which the Simulink model for a hydrogen fuel
cell system involving two stacks of fuel cells, series RLC load, BCH
encoder/decoder blocks, voltage and current measuring units, and PID
 controller are shown, the system can be seen to be in very stable
conditions without the variation of dynamical change. This may be caused
by a strongly regulated PID controller, idle or constant load, or Tafel slope
computation misconfiguration. The flat slope may also be a result of the
electrochemical kinetics not responding, for example, because no
dynamic load conditions are present or as a result of model config errors.

It is recommended to crosscheck the input signals to the Tafel slope

calculator block, include variable load conditions to simulate a realistic
dynamic condition, and ensure the Tafel equation to be working with real-
time input values. A crosscheck of the PID controller settings could also
prove useful since too stringent control could over-stabilize the system
and allow no kinetically observable alterations. Plotting both the Tafel
curve (overpotential vs. log(current density)) and its slope simultaneously
may provide more information on the system's behavior.

Fig (6). Exchange Current i0 (A)

The graph named “Exchange current i₀ (A)” shows the variation of exchange
current with time, in which time is taken along the x-axis and exchange
current in amperes along the y-axis. The graph displays a constant value of
exchange current around 0.23 A, which is constant and unaltered for the entire
observed time period. This implies that the electrochemical activity on
electrode surfaces is stable and free of any loading change or transients.

Exchange current is a fundamental fuel cell kinetic parameter describing the

rate of electrochemical reaction with no net current flow. A constant implies
that the reaction kinetics are stable, (i.e.,) there is a fixed environment in the
vicinity of electrode surfaces. But if this constancy is not anticipated, it may
also suggest that dynamic effects or real-time load or condition changes are
not being suitably modeled in the simulation.

Fig(5). Stackconsumption(Standardlpm)[Air(Yellow);Fuel(Magneta)]

The Stack consumption (Standard lpm) [Air(Yellow); Fuel(Magenta)]graph

indicates the fuel and air consumption rate of the fuel cell stack in standard
liters per minute (lpm). The orange line is a horizontal zero at all points
throughout the whole duration of the graph, indicating that there is no fuel
(presumably hydrogen) and air (oxygen) consumption recorded. What this
translates to is that the fuel cell stack is either not operational or not burning
any reactants during the measurement or simulation. Zero consumption could
be caused by a number of different factors. It could indicate that the fuel cell
stack is damaged, possibly because there is no load or just because there is a
loose contact in the model or simulation.

Also, if the current is not being consumed, then no electrochemical reactions

would be taking place, hence closing off fuel and air supply. Input parameter
misconfiguration like flow rates or the blocks of measurement can also be a
probable cause. For the output to be valid, it has to be that the fuel cell is
running, the load is connected, and all the blocks of measurement and
simulation are properly set. The operation is monitored by watching the
current, voltage, and other similar performance parameters. It can detect and
correct the fault.
Fig (7). Utilization(%) [O2(Yellow); H2(Magneta)]
The graph named " Utilization(%)( O₂( Yellow); H₂( Magenta))" is the The HDL Induction Motor block will accept motor parameters and operating
percent application of hydrogen and oxygen vs. time in a energy cell modes via the Config input port, and LdTrq/Spd inputs specify load torque
system. Time is on thex-axis, while the percent application is on the y- or speed control. A power policy for energy allocation is formulated to
axis. Both oxygen's application line and hydrogen's application line manage the distribution of energy among hydrogen fuel cell (HFC), potential
appear to be flat at a veritably small value of roughly 0.01 over the total hybrid storage system (battery/supercapacitor) and induction motor load, and
of simulation time. This patient and low position of consumption is that dynamic stability by an action-mental control procedure.The development
the feed of the reactant is n't employed efficiently by the energy cell process of the control algorithm involves increasing the fuel cell efficiency,
system, and this might be a sign of underutilization of the energy cell motor torque control scheme, voltage and speed. Verification and simulation
mound or an error in the simulation configuration. Its causes could be a phase includes study of fuel cell response, motor efficiency, and hydrogen
mismatch in the cargo demand, indecorous inflow rates, or the capacity consumption dynamics at different loads. These strategies are compared to
of the mound to drive the energy into electricity being shy. friction establish optimum fuel intake and system response time. Performance
immaculately with cargo and operating conditions would be the proper parameters like voltage-current relations, power efficiency, and torque-
use, and a low, flat line can indicate that either the mound is in idle speed plots are graphically analyzed to determine system performance.
operation or dynamic response is inadequately modeled.
In the Hydrogen Fuel Cell Management System, Three-Phase Voltage
Source Inverter (VSI) is modeled and controlled by MATLAB Simulink
for effective energy conversion and suitable power control. The inverter
is configured to give line-to-neutral voltage signals to a balanced three-
phase load using the switching operation governed by the provided phase
voltage inputs for effective voltage regulation. Second, inverter loss is
determined by speed inputs (w_eff_bp in rad/s) and torque values
(T_eff_bp in Nm), which helps in developing a power loss database
(ploss_table in watts) under several operating conditions.

A closed-loop power management strategy is formulated to optimize

energy distribution between the hydrogen fuel cell (HFC), energy storage
unit (battery/supercapacitor), and the induction motor load. The VSI is
fine-tuned to minimize switching losses while maintaining optimal
torque-speed control and ensuring stable system operation. The
performance evaluation is conducted through simulation of voltage-
current characteristics, power efficiency, and dynamic response under
transient load conditions. Advanced control algorithm, such as PID are
implemented to regulate output parameters and enhance system stability.

The integration of the Starter Motor block into the Hydrogen Fuel Cell
Management System Algorithm involves the development of a MATLAB
Simulink model simulating a separately excited DC motor to function as
a torque source. The motor model is parameterized with armature winding
resistance (Ra), armature winding inductance (La), field winding
resistance (Rf), field winding inductance (Lf), mutual inductance (Laf),
and initial armature-field current (Iaf) to ensure accurate dynamic
response.

A power-electronic interface (such as a DC-DC converter) is incorporated to

regulate voltage and ensure seamless power transfer between the hydrogen
fuel cell (HFC), energy storage (battery/supercapacitor), and the DC motor
load. A closed-loop control strategy is implemented, employing PID or Fuzzy
Logic control algorithms to optimize torque speed response and system
Fig(8). Power Management, Control Strategies, and Load Integration stability under varying load conditions. The performance analysis includes
voltage-current characteristics, torque- speed behavior, efficiency mapping,
and transient response evaluation.
The system includes eight fuel cell stacks that are individual sources of
power to the hydrogen fuel cell management system. The stacks produce
DC power and are configured in sequential parallel or series to provide The provided Simulink model illustrates a sophisticated Hydrogen Fuel Cell
balanced power sharing and redundancy. Voltage and current sensors are Management System for efficient energy generation, conversion, and
strategically positioned above each stack for monitoring output utilization. It utilizes multiple fuel cell stacks as the primary sources of power,
characteristics in real-time to facilitate fault detection and prevention of each receiving controlled supply of air and fuel flow to provide consistent and
inefficiency in utilization. The fuel cell stacks are connected to power stable DC power output.This power is conditioned by a system of DC-DC
management units that provide energy flow management, power-sharing converters and a three-phase voltage source inverter, which together provide
optimization, and stack aging over time. The addition of hydrogen flow voltage regulation and AC conversion for motor-driven applications.
regulators and cooling devices also provides for optimal stack
performance under varying load conditions. A bidirectional DC-DC converter connects to an energy storage system, often
a battery or supercapacitor, to provide power continuity during load
To build a Hydrogen Fuel Cell Management System Algorithm, it begins transients. The system features an induction motor installed, controlled by a
with system modeling based on MATLAB Simulink, for instance, an dedicated IM Controller that dynamically adjusts torque, speed, and phase
induction motor and a hydrogen fuel cell as parameters for specifying currents through feedback from PWM generators and PID controllers. These
major electrical and mechanical parameters in load dynamics analysis. A control algorithms are supplemented by real-time feedback from current and
power distribution strategy is formulated to govern energy transfer among voltage sensors to facilitate adaptive response to varying operating conditions.
the fuel cell, hybrid storage (if used), and the motor through closed-loop The use of Bus Creators and Bus Selectors ensures structured signal routing,
control to achieve maximum efficiency.Control algorithm design involves while Scope blocks provide visualization of key parameters like voltage,
MPPT usage for fuel cell optimization, motor torque control, and current, torque, and fuel consumption.
PID/Fuzzy logic controllers for voltage and speed control. The system is
simulated and tested to analyze power response, motor performance, and
hydrogen consumption efficiency. While optimizing, the different control
strategies are compared and voltage-current, power efficiency, and
torque-speed characteristics performance plots are obtained.
The implemention of Equivalent Circuit Battery Model in a Hydrogen Fuel
Cell Management System begins with battery model parameterization, The plot illustrates the present output behavior of the hydrogen fuel cell
where the Open Circuit Voltage (Em) is defined as a function of the State-of- control system during a normalized simulation time. As evident, the present
Charge (SOC) using lookup tables, and the Series Resistance (R0) is mapped is always stable and does not show any major transients or oscillations,
across different SOC levels to account for internal resistance variations. which is a clear sign of proper system regulation.This corresponds to the
SOC_BP and Temperature_BP breakpoints are set to model battery behavior system architecture in the Simulink simulation, where PID controllers
under varying load and temperature conditions. The battery is then integrated regulate output parameters such as voltage and current regardless of
into the hybrid system as an energy buffer between the Hydrogen Fuel Cell changing load conditions.
(HFC), Energy Storage System (ESS), and Motor Load to ensure stable
power distribution. A closed-loop control algorithm dynamically regulates The red trace indicates that the control strategy controls current within limits
the charge/discharge cycle based on real-time SOC levels and power effectively even in the presence of system complexity with multiple stacks
demands, while battery capacity parameters (BattCap & BattCapInit) help of fuel cells, bidirectional converters, and load elements like induction
maintain energy availability during transient load conditions. Optimization motors and RLC loads. It would mean that the algorithm is capable of
of RC parameters is performed to minimize voltage drops, enhance transient balancing energy delivery around the system with minimal overshoot and
response, and reduce energy dissipation. The final step involves validating reliability. This kind of response is imperative in real-time hydrogen fuel
the model by comparing simulation results with theoretical and experimental cell operation where constant current output is required to shield sensitive
benchmarks, fine-tuning control algorithms, and optimizing battery components and ensure system efficiency.
parameters to improve power stability, battery longevity, and overall fuel cell
efficiency.

The PID controller in the Hydrogen Fuel Cell Management System

optimizes voltage, current, and power regulation through real-time
feedback in MATLAB Simulink. Configured in a continuous-time
parallel form, it uses initial gains of P = 1, I = 1, D = 0, and a filter
coefficient of 100. The PID Tuner App automates tuning to minimize
overshoot, steady-state error, and settling time. Simulations assess voltage
regulation, power efficiency, and transient stability. Integrated with the
Equivalent Circuit Battery Model, the controller ensures seamless power
distribution between the Hydrogen Fuel Cell (HFC), Energy Storage
System (ESS), and motor load, enhancing overall system performance and
stability.

Fig(10). Voltage.

The above figure displays the voltage response of the hydrogen fuel cell
system against a simulated time normalized to it. The magenta horizontal and
flat waveform represents that the system provides constant voltage output
with minimal deviations and transients. The response represents that the
control structure—particularly the use of DC-DC voltage controllers as well
as the use of PID regulators—is enough in providing stability to the voltage
within the entire system.

Pointing to the given Simulink model, the fuel cell's bridging stacks are linked
to a DC-DC voltage control module as well as to feedback loops that are
observing voltage using measurement blocks. The steady bridging voltage in
the plot ensures that the control as well as feedback features are timed with
each other so that tight voltage regulation under different operation modes,
such as changing loads or driving needs of motors, is ensured.

This voltage stability is needed to ensure performance on induction motors,

RLC loads, and bidirectional converters employed in the model. It also
indicates the efficiency of the developed algorithmic control in ensuring
Fig(9). Current.
energy balance and operational reliability in hydrogen fuel cell systems under
real-time conditions.
 The efficiency of the two system configurations is graphed versus a
normalized time scale on the "Stack Efficiency (%)." The large exponential
increase of the blue line is an indication of an adaptive control mechanism
that, at every instant, increases the system's performance. This
enhancement suggests that dynamic controls such as real-time PID,
Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT), or fuzzy logic controllers are
being employed to enhance fuel efficiency and efficiently respond to
varying load conditions. On the other hand, the orange line remains
horizontal, indicating a uniform efficiency throughout the simulation. A
perfectly controlled or baseline system being non-adaptive in nature and
hence having a constant but underperforming efficiency level is the
implication of such a flat slope. Overall, the graph provides an indication
as to how dynamic control methods are better able to improve the efficiency
of fuel cell stacks and how they make hydrogen fuel cell systems have more
sustainable and responsive energy management.

Fig(11). Stack Efficiency(%)

The graph shows the efficiency of the hydrogen fuel cell system over time.
The yellow dashed line shows that the efficiency is constant over the test. The
constant curve shows that the fuel cell stacks are running on a constant and
optimal level of efficiency, without any considerable drop or fluctuation in
the given conditions. This uniform performance results from the efficiency
control mechanisms present in the Simulink system, including PID
controllers, units of load, and DC-DC converters. These units allow for fuel
usage, voltage control, and supply of power to be achieved at the desired rate
that the system demands, to make the system perform very effectively.
Simply put, this is a perpetual efficiency where power losses are minimal,
chemical reactions are stable, and input power is equal to output power. All Fig(13). Armcurr
these are required in hydrogen fuel cell power systems so that they can remain
sustainable and reliable. The "ArmCurr" graph shows the armature current response of a device in the
hydrogen fuel cell system control, likely an induction motor or power
electronic converter. The curve indicates an initial steep slope in current,
which indicates high inrush or transient load typically observed during the
starting period of activating a motor or sudden load switching on. This is then
followed by a peak, then the current slows down gradually over time, which
indicates that the system is at a steady-state condition or the control
mechanisms—a PID controller—is successfully controlling the current to
achieve stable operation. The decay with smoothness also indicates good
damping with very few oscillations, which shows excellent control loop
tuning and system stability. In summary, the graph validates that the system
under dynamic conditions performs well and stabilizes to a steady-state
operating condition, necessary for sustaining efficient and reliable energy
delivery in fuel cell-based applications.

Fig(12). Stack Efficiency(%)

 The graph titled `PwrInfo` shows a number of power parameters plotted
against time from an energy conversion or fuel cell simulation. The
different lines are for different parameters of power relations, i.e.,
produced power, drawn power, and maybe loss or efficiencies. The solid
thick orange curve shows an increasing trend, and will represent total
power output or total energy input; the purple dashed dotted curve rises
then tapers which can signify that it is net useful power, or power that is
supplied to the load, tapering off after a rise. The blue dashed line plots
below zero but rises in value slowly; this could be reactive or idle power
that becomes less and less negative, as time passes—i.e., it becomes more
actively utilized. The yellow dashed line goes down further in the negative
direction; this could represent cumulative losses such as heat or
inefficiencies that accumulate over time. What this trend suggests is, even
while the system creates more power through time, there are losses and
efficiencies that will change while the system is running. This graph is
significant for figuring out energy balance, and understanding trends of
efficiency, and loss behavior in the system of interest.

Fig(14). FldCurr

The `FldCur` graph illustrates the time variation of field current. The curve is a
smooth, steady rise from a value close to zero and then increases steadily before
seeming to level off towards a saturation point. This is the kind of behavior one
would expect in systems where a magnetic field is being created or built up
progressively—e.g., in the excitation system of a DC machine or synchronous
generator. The upward trend shows that the system can allow the field current to be
developed gradually such that abrupt rushes will not ruin equipment or destabilize
the system. The curve also illustrates a controlled build-up, most likely as a function
of feedback loops or current regulators in the system to ensure a safe and stable
energizing process. This type of analysis plays a critical role in the transient response
of electrical machines and the validation of simulation models for power systems.

Fig(16). MtrTrq

The chart labeled `MtrTq` appears to show the torque characteristics of a

motor for a period of time, probably in a simulation about motor
characteristics or a drive train. The Y-axis is defined in the range of -1000Nm
to 1000Nm, which is probably quite high for torque of a motor. The X-axis
appears to have a time or simulation step of some sort. The multiple lines on
the chart, with differing colors and line styles probably represent different
torque values, include actual torque, reference torque, and possibly some sort
of feedback or disturbance of the torque. All of the lines are almost flat and
very closely overlapped. This indicates that the motor did indeed output
constant torque for the entire simulation. The slight variations in the signal,
suggests some minor feedback correction or simply noise in the sensor, but
would not cause any impact on the effectiveness of torque delivered to the
load. Overall, this chart certainly proves the torque control works reliable and
very accurate in this system for the time span of this simulation.

Fig(15). PwrInfo
 The graph, `IdRot`, shows a signal that is not barely varying over the
measured range of the x-axis. The y-axis signal is maintained to be generally
around 1×10⁶ with no apparent variations, which indicates that the magnitude
of whatever the variable represents, in this case possibly the measured d-axis
rotor current (in motor control) is being held constant. Such a result typically
reflects that the control system functioned appropriately by keeping the d-axis
current constant to maximize torque or minimize magnetic losses in the
motor. It must be noted that a thick purple dashed line that is consistent
implies consistent control input, or that the state of the system is at true steady
state and there were not external perturbations or dynamic variables over the
length of which this measurement was taken or normalized. All in all, this
graph is largely uniform controlled variable indicating a controlled and
balanced operating state.

Fig(17). MtrSpd

The graph seems to show a decaying trend for motor speed with respect to some
normalized or time variable on the x-axis between 0 to 1. The y-axis is approximately
±1×10⁶; it shows that motor speed starts at a high value and decreases slowly in a
nonlinear manner approaching the right end of the graph. The graph shows that the
motor speed decreased very slightly and until about half way (x ≈ 0.5) the decrease
is slow and flat suggesting maintained speed. However, after halfway, the motor
speed becomes steeper until approaching the right end of the plot. These types of
patterns are indicative of systems experiencing exponential or quadratic decay. It is
possible the motor is decelerating due to increased loading, energy loss, or braking.
The orange dotted and green dashed lines seem to show that there is possibly a
comparison of multiple datasets or best fit models, and since they track closely this
indicates similarities in behavior, or that the curve of the best fit model closely
represented the observed data for motor speed. The curves seem to have high quality
together, and the quality of the figures, such as consistency between curves, suggests
high quality data collection and good modeling.

Fig(19). IaStator

The graph labeled `IaStator` depicts the evolution of the stator current across
a normalised time or cycle of operation. The plot shows two main lines of
movement: first, a purple dashed line which appears mostly constant across
the x-axis, suggesting either a reference value or an expected output in steady
state; and second, an orange curve made of densely populated data points
which starts at a similar level as the straight dashed line but then decreases in
a nonlinear, concave-down manner, representing decaying stator current over
time and is quite apparent past x ≈ 0.5 and especially at the end of the range
indicating a rate of drop.

The distance between the actual current (orange) and the reference or
comparison line (purple) suggest that the stator current is not being held you
would expect, perhaps due to a decrease in torque demand, the system
shutting down or disengaging the control system. This particular graph may
be representative of dynamic conditions where the motor de-biases to idle or
varied controlled desceleration. Overall, the graph highlights a target
behaviour and a real-time response which warrants further exploration of the
system performance or control precision in the latter half of the cycle.
Fig(18). IdRot
 The graph labelled `BattSoc` plots the battery's State of Charge (SoC) for
the specified time or cycle (on the x-axis). The values on the y-axis are fairly
low, just above 0, as indicated by the flat orange line and close red dashed
trend.This would indicate that the battery is nearly empty and stays at a very
low charge for the entire observational period. The flatline tells us the battery
was stable, and it was either not charging or discharging significantly during
that time period. The device could have been idle or been in a mode that did
not allow for any flow of energy, or the device (system) may not have
properly been working. Alternatively/ ultimately, the system may have been
in a low-power or standby mode, where it was consuming very little energy,
while the battery stayed in a nearly empty state. Consistently low SoC can
be problematic (i.e., battery needs charge soon, or at risk of deep discharge),
and can reduce due to longevity (and performance).

Fig(20). BattAmpHr

The chart 'BattAmpHr' shows a strong steady trend in battery ampere-hours

(AmpHr) over the time span plotted on the x-axis time normalized. The data also
appears to cluster around values just below 30, for instance the blue dashed line
apparently acts as a reference or modeled value and the green dotted line (real
measured data likely) appears to track it closely with very little deviation just below
that value. Somewhat evidencing the consistent characteristics of the battery state
of charge or cumulative actual energy delivery, with its range remaining very little
over the data recorded over the time duration in question. This particular trend
would indicate either the system was in standby, consuming very low current or in
operation under steady state conditions with her power consumption managed. Even
the fact that the two curves closely align indicates the measurements or modeled Fig(22). BattVolt
values are also accurate and is showing similar reliability. Overall, this type of graph
represents a good and stable battery performance scenario without rapid depletion The BattVolt curve displays battery voltage over either a normalized time or
patterns and no significant aberrations. operational cycle. The data appears as an almost flat line in orange and red
with values continually measuring around 5 volts on average. This indicates
that the voltage for the battery is very stable during the entire period with little
to no significant spikes or drops. The smoothness of that voltage waveform
may indicate that the system is not exhibiting heavy loading or is being
operated entirely under controlled conditions with good balance of power
demand. This also indicates that the battery seems fairly healthy with
reasonable full voltage with very little strain or decline. However, because the
battery appears on the low side for most large or vehicle battery systems, it
stands to reason that either the battery pack is relatively small, or that the
battery has already discharged considerably and is now in stand-by, regulated
mode. Overall, the graph displays a low voltage, steady condition, which
should be evaluated in relation to other metrics, such as the battery state of
charge (SoC) and ampere-hours, to assess general condition of system health.

Fig(21). BattSoc
 The plot labeled `PwrInfo` consists of two separate lines, one horizontal line in
bright magenta above the zero-axis, and the other in cyan below the zero-axis.
The magenta line is always above zero and the cyan line is always
negative.This arrangement indicates that the plot is looking to assess two types
of power to a normalized timeline - potentially input vs. output power, or
generated vs. consumed power, etc. The magenta line is above zero, without
variation, implying some kind of stable supplied or expected power, and the
cyan line is below zero, and the only viewable line with no variation, which
may represent some kind of constant negative value like power drawn, or net
losses of power. The fact that there is no variation in both lines (both flat) may
suggest stable power consumption or delivery, where there are no drop-offs,
nor spikes, which alludes to some kind of steady-state operation, indicating that
there is no wasted energy, nor excess consumption of energy. This observation
could imply that the system is doing something under fixed load, or tests are
running in an idle lifeless state.The lines clearly have seperated without
intersection, which indicate that there is no balance of power or a net-zero
condition. So, either more power is being supplied or the negative value of
power maybe indicative of some regenerative energy flow or perhaps
calibration values.

Fig(23). BattPwr

The graph named `BattPwr` reports the power output from the battery over a time
normalized for operational cycles. We can see two lines, the first is a thin purple line
which is a constant value over 4. The second, a thick yellow line represents the actual
battery power consumption which has a constant value just above 0. This explains
that while the expected or reference battery power (purple) was constant throughout
the entire period of observation the battery consumption (yellow) continually used
very minimal or integrally measured to almost no power. We can understand that the
actual battery power consumption does not fluctuate in value meaning the battery
only supplied very small amounts of power to the system because either the system
was sitting idle, powered in standby mode, powered from some other source, or
almost extremely low load on the system. There remains a fixed difference between
the expected (purple) - actual (yellow) values, signalling a potential marginal issue
with power provisioning or the configuration of the system. In general, this suggests
that power capacity is available, but it is either being consumed at very low rate or
possibly being conserved, with a low use power capacity reflecting an inactive or
low operational demand system state.

Fig(25). BattCurr

The figure, `BattCurr`, demonstrates battery current against time in the

simulation. The current is almost constant and steady near zero throughout
the simulation; it is reasonable to state that "the battery current is very stable
and near zero." The flat-line aspect of this behavior indicates that the battery
is neither supplying current, nor drawing current.This possibly indicates a few
system model conditions: that the battery is not under load, the vehicle/system
is idling, or that power requirements are satisfied via a different means
altogether (e.g., regenerative sources or an auxiliary power unit). Considering
the Simulink model provided previously, this means that the battery
subsystem is either in a standby state, or the energy consumption and
generation are balanced with no significant net current flowing through the
battery terminals.

Fig(24). PwrInfo
 Conversely, it could describe a decay of torque in response to a control
signal or some other variance defined in the dynamic system parameters
such as braking, resistance, or speed to name a few. The fact that the slope
is constant indicates a percentage or proportional response to its
influencing factor, perhaps time, speed, or other potential inputs. This
investigation confirms that the system continues to exist with predictable
motor torque decay under specific conditions, and we may find areas to
investigate for increased performance or stable operation.

Fig(26). SrcPwr

This graph most likely represents a performance or system response measure from
the earlier Simulink model schematic. The non-linear curve shows a dependent
variable, which could be either system power or efficiency (shown as "SrcPwr" in
the title of the graph) plotted against time, or some other dependent system
input/output variable.The curve increases to a peak performance or power, given
favorable conditions to reach a highest point and diminishes after which time,
indicating the system approaches saturation, inefficiency, or other components are Fig(28). LdPwr
modeled to limit performance (resistive losses, actuator limits, thermal restraints,
etc.). The graph portrays a parabolic trend for the variable labeled (presumably
"Load Power"), which initially increases, reaches a maximum point, and
thereafter declines. This behavior represents that the system has an efficiency
point where maximum load power is achieved, and thereafter continued use
will result in lower and lower power output. The initial increase indicates
efficient use and operation in a correctly set environment; the decline
represents the inability for a system to output loads to the full extent due to
losses, stress, and/or changing inputs. The full parabolic shape represents a
functional part of a dynamic system; the shape demonstrates maximizing
output in the range of ideal performance is crucial. Understanding a system's
efficiency through this parabolic curve provides a clearer understanding of the
importance of system designs and how they are used to ensure stable, efficient,
and effective fungibility.

Fig(27). MtrTrqEst

This graph illustrates a decreasing trend, likely a variable whose label is

"MtrTrqEst," which we assume stands for "Motor Torque Estimate." The
dashed line represents a projected or simulated trend perhaps from the
Simulink model presented earlier. The curve clearly illustrates a trend of
increasing tor emerge over the measured or simulated interval. This behavior
could be from increasing load, decreased input power, energy lost in system Fig(29). PwrLoss
losses, etc.
The graphic illustrates a trend of some variable, likely the loss in power, over
some range. The shape of the graphic suggests to me that there is preliminary
growth, an eventual local minimum or drop off, and subsequent faster
increase. this likely implies some undefined dynamic system for which loss
of power is not defined as changes in operating conditions in some linear
manner. The initial increase shows behaviour indicative of a loss in power as
the system transitions from the ideal operating state, likely a growth in lost
efficiencies.

The observation of local minimum or decrease likely indicates some minor

improvement / stabilization of losses due to either optimized operating
conditions or changes to the operational mode of the system.The sharp
increase thereafter indicates rapid increases of power losses, again likely
associated with under or over loading, thermal effects, or losses in efficiency
which can be increasingly prevalent or unreachable at riskier operating points.

This analysis draws attention to identifying the system's operating range most
effectively to minimize power losses. In addition, the potential to fall victim
to inefficiencies or failure of the system at the sharp rise in higher values
suggests the need for adjustment in design or control respectively to alleviate
risk.

Fig(31). Stack Efficiency(%)

The graph shows how stack efficiency (%) changes with time, where time sits
on the horizontal axis and efficiency sits on the vertical axis. The orange curve
shows that the stack efficiency began at a peak value of just below 8%
efficiency and shows a general downward trend with increasing time, which
means that stack efficiency continues to decline, likely due to heat generation,
fuel consumption, changes in the materials, or other losses in the system
become more substantial over time. Although the decline is not linear, it is
representative of a decaying exponential that approaches zero without
actually reaching zero. This suggests that potentially as the system continues
to operate, it suffers diminishing returns in performance value. As with the
other graph, the title is also a placeholder , which implies the worst case
scenario that an incomplete presentation has been set up, and therefore should
be corrected for better clarification.

Fig(30). Voltage

The graph depicts a trend of voltage over time, with voltage values represented
on the vertical (y) axis and probably time or another time-related parameter along
the horizontal (x) axis. The cyan line shows a voltage start slightly above 44, with
it quickly rising to under 46 (but above 45). After the initial zipping upward, the
voltage ``levels/flatlines'' - remains constant for the remaining period displayed
on the graph. This behavior suggests that the device/system being measured
reaches a steady-state voltage after the system has been powered on / adjusted,
and a proper initial start up / adjustment period. The small up and down
fluctuations are are suggestive of good voltage regulation, and system stability.
That said, the placeholder title suggests that this graph is probably in a report or
visualization that needed content. A well labelled and clear title would have
provided better understanding and stated further clarity.

Fig(32). Current
This plot shows the current affair of the system, probably a hydrogen energy
cell over time. The current is on the y- axis and time is on thex-axis. The [7] Z. Zhu and C. Tong, "Research on Control Parameters of
grandiloquent line shows a small decay from its starting value and shows how Hydrogen-Based Composite Microgrid Equipment Operation Based
the affair current decreases linearly over time. This shows that the system is on Bi-level Composite Ant Colony Algorithm Strategy," 2024 3rd
changing its affair. Although the system's current affair may be the cause of International Conference on Energy, Power and Electrical
the adaptation, the line indicates that other internal adaptations are taking Technology (ICEPET), Chengdu, China, 2024, pp. 1881-1885, doi:
place despite the system's declining affair. Those internal adaptations could 10.1109/ICEPET61938.2024.10626300.
be responding to reduced effectiveness, thermal limits or conceivably indeed
energy limits. From an analysis perspective, this type of wind implies there's
a current control algorithm with regulation within the system's operation [8] Y. Zheng, Z. Yang, X. Li, L. Chang and B. Zhang, "Adaptive
algorithm. The gradational current pullout may be the system modifying optimization algorithm for fuzzy control of fuel cell range extender
current affair to limit electrical and thermal conditions to remain operationally vehicle*," 2023 7th CAA International Conference on Vehicular
safe, or it may just be managing current affair to remain effective over time Control and Intelligence (CVCI), Changsha, China, 2023, pp. 1-6,
and to limit the voltage drops due to affair current on the energy cell mound. doi: 10.1109/CVCI59596.2023.10397447.
The direct progression of the current without significant dislocation, indicates
the system was suitable to maintain current affair continuously without
perceptible transients. The plot title continues to remain a placeholder, [9] A. Fu, J. Bosrup, S. Renzaglia, M. Cvetkovic, M. Kreijns and M.
suggesting the title may be part of some larger prototype or development Zeman, "Design and Implementation a Local Energy Hub for Urban
process that could use real markers, which will help clarify interpretation of Environment," 2024 IEEE 52nd Photovoltaic Specialist Conference
the data in there reports and donations. (PVSC), Seattle, WA, USA, 2024, pp. 0728-0730, doi:
10.1109/PVSC57443.2024.10748960.

IV. CONCLUSION [10] S. Hou, H. Yin, B. Pla, J. Gao and H. Chen, "Real-Time Energy
Management Strategy of a Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle With Global
The two Simulink models presented here are various points in the evolution Optimal Learning," in IEEE Transactions on Transportation
of a Hydrogen Fuel Cell Management System. The initial model depicts a Electrification, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 5085-5097, Dec. 2023, doi:
reduced versionwith emphasis on simple stack control, load regulation, BCH 10.1109/TTE.2023.3238101.
error correction, and real-time monitoring of voltage, current, and fuel/air
flow. This is well suited to the analysis of basic stack performance, data
acquisition, and early control algorithm verification. The second model, by [11] D. C. da Silva, L. Kefsi and A. Sciarretta, "Closed-Form
comparison, is an even higher-fidelity, more advanced system featuring Expression to Estimate the Hydrogen Consumption of a Fuel Cell
several stacks of fuel cell, DC-DC converters, induction motor drivers, Hybrid Electric Vehicle," in IEEE Transactions on Vehicular
bidirectional converters, energy storage, and high-level control approaches Technology, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 4717-4728, April 2024, doi:
employing many PID controllers. It also contains enhanced load control, 10.1109/TVT.2024.3350351.
inverter, and overall efficiency optimization over all the sub-systems. The
shift from the early model to the advanced model reflects a progressive
development strategy. The early model provides a platform for verifying [12] B. Indrajith, K. Gunawardane, L. Li, R. Zamora, A. Hossain and
fundamental ideas, and the advanced model provides end-to-end simulation R. Nicholson, "Operation Comparison of Hydrogen-DC Microgrid in
of actual applications, such as dynamic load management, hybrid storage Grid-Connected and Islanded Scenarios," 2024 18th International
behavior, and end-to-end energy flow management. This tired development Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems
results in a sound, efficient, and versatile hydrogen fuel cell management (PMAPS), Auckland, New Zealand, 2024, pp. 1-6, doi:
system that can guarantee optimal performance in various operational 10.1109/PMAPS61648.2024.1066.
conditions.

V. REFERENCES

[1]. R. Zhang and H. Gao, "Analysis of trend of diesel oil consumption of

agricultural mechanization and energy-saving strategic measures in
China", Trans. Chin. Soc. Agricult. Eng., vol. 23, pp. 280-284, Dec. 2007.

[2]. Z. Zhu, Y. Yang, D. Wang, Y. Cai and L. Lai, "Energy saving

performance of agricultural tractor equipped with mechanic-electronic
hydraulic powertrain system", Agriculture, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 436, Mar.
2022.

[3]. F. Tao, L. Zhu, Z. Fu, P. Si and L. Sun, "Frequency decoupling-based

energy management strategy for fuel cell/battery/ultracapacitor hybrid
vehicle using fuzzy control method", IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 166491-
166502, 2020.

[4]. D. Li, B. Xu, J. Tian and Z. Ma, "Energy management strategy for
fuel cell and battery hybrid vehicle based on fuzzy logic", Processes, vol.
8, no. 8, pp. 882, Jul. 2020.

[5]. R. K. Kumawat and D. K. Palwalia, "A novel PWM control for

symmetric multilevel inverter based on half bridge module", IEEE 7th
Power India International Conference (PIICON), pp. 1-5, 2016.

[6] R. Ma, J. Song, H. Zhang, B. Zhang, Y. Wang and B. Liang, "A

PMP Energy Management Strategy based on State Switching for a
Fuel Cell UAV," IECON 2021 – 47th Annual Conference of the IEEE
Industrial Electronics Society, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2021, pp. 1-6,
doi: 10.1109/IECON48115.2021.9589089.