Man Institute

Analysis

An Introduction to Machine Learning

December 2019

Artificial intelligence, and in particular machine learning, can play beneficial

roles within investment management, especially in applications where there
is a relative abundance of data.

For institutional investor, qualified investor and investment professional use only. Not for retail public distribution.

Authors

Dr Anthony Ledford
Chief Scientist, Man AHL

[Link]/maninstitute
‘‘
Although the terms
‘Artificial Intelligence’
This interview originally appeared as the chapter ‘Humans versus Machines’ in the
2019 Mercer publication Investment Wisdom for the Digital Age. Dr Anthony Ledford
was interviewed by Dr Harry Liem, Director of Strategic Research and Head of Capital
Markets for Mercer in the Pacific Region.

and ‘Machine
Learning’ are often Introduction
Whilst artificial intelligence (‘AI’) has been around since at least the 1950s, interest
used interchangeably, in the topic has boomed since 2012. This has been driven largely by applied
they mean quite breakthroughs with Deep Learning in diverse applications such as image recognition,
natural language processing (‘NLP’) and superhuman performance in the game of Go.
different things. ’’ Unlike the AI doom-mongers, however, we remain sanguine about the possibility of AI
‘taking over’ as evil robot overlords, rating this as science fiction rather than impending
science fact.

The experience of Man AHL over the last decade is that AI, and in particular machine
learning (‘ML’), can play beneficial roles within investment management, especially in
applications where there is a relative abundance of data. For example, our research
and development in faster speed (e.g. daily and intra-day) systematic investment
strategies, together with algorithms for trade execution and smart order-routing,
have all made extensive use of ML. More recently, we have developed and deployed
systematic investment strategies that exploit text-based data using NLP.

The investment management and AI industries are both undergoing rapid change. We
expect to see more consolidation of investment managers as both fee erosion and the
costs of doing innovative state-of-the-art research take effect. Some currently ‘cutting-
edge’ alphas (including some ML models) will transition into alternative betas, whilst
a new cohort of data science researchers will seek-out new alphas to replace them.
Internationally, North America and China have been the leading investors in AI and
ML research. The traditional model of methodological AI research being undertaken in
universities has changed significantly over the last decade, with much now originating
in blue-sky company laboratories and being openly published, with a corresponding
drift of research staff from universities to these laboratories. Without a strong source of
people to replace these university researchers, the research landscape could become
fundamentally changed. To mitigate this, joint industry-university collaborations such as
the Oxford-Man Institute (‘OMI’) may become more common.

What do you define as artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep

learning, noting that not all of our readers may have sat through your
instructional videos?
Although the terms Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning are often used
interchangeably, they mean quite different things. AI is a broad catch-all term that
describes the ability of a machine – usually a computer system – to act in a way that
imitates intelligent human behaviour.

In contrast, ML is the study of the algorithms and methods that enable computers to
solve specific tasks without being explicitly instructed how to solve these tasks, instead
doing so by identifying persistent relevant patterns within observed data. 1

Deep Learning refers to a subset of ML algorithms that make use of large arrays of
Artificial Neural Networks (‘ANNs’). 2

1. This general definition of machine learning is very broad. However, within Man AHL the convention is to exclude standard statistical techniques such as linear regression.
Others take a different view. 2. Artificial Neural Networks are computing systems inspired by the biological neural networks found in animal (including human) brains. Such
systems progressively improve their ability to do tasks by considering examples, generally without task-specific programming.

An Introduction to Machine Learning |2

 Figure 1: The Relationship Between Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Deep Learning

Artificial
Intelligence
Early artificial intelligence
stirs excitement.
Machine
Learning
Machine learning begins
to flourish. Deep
Learning
Deep learning breakthroughs
drive AI boom.

1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s 2000’s 2010’s

Source: MindMajix 3 For illustrative purposes

So why the resurging interest in artificial intelligence, given the field has
been around since the 1950s?4
Many practical problems that humans take for granted – such as driving a car,
translating between languages or recognising faces in photos – have proven to be too
complex to solve with explicitly codified computer programs. Indeed, AI researchers
tried this approach for decades, but empirical research showed it is much easier to
solve such problems by gathering a large number of examples (so called training data)
and letting the relevant statistical regularities emerge from within these. For solving
such problems, this ML approach has beaten – by a wide margin – the best human
engineered solutions.

Deep Learning has become extremely popular since 2012, when a deep learning
system for image recognition beat competing systems based on other technologies by
a significant margin, but the development of ANNs can be traced back to at least the
1940s and 1950s, as you point out.

Can you go over the concepts behind the different ML methods?

Supervised Learning is when each example in the training data has both input features
(things you can observe, measure or infer) and an outcome or target. The idea is
to learn the relationship between the inputs and the outcomes from the assembled
training data.

For example, in the 2012 image recognition competition that kick-started all the
subsequent deep learning interest, supervised learning was used on Imagenet. This is
a large database of digital images where each image has been pre-labelled according
to its contents (e.g. bird, fish, plant, etc). 5 Here, the inputs were the images, the
outcomes or targets were the key words describing each image, and the learning task
was to develop a system to reproduce the labels for each image.

Unsupervised Learning refers to when the elements of the training data do not have
outcomes, and the focus is then on identifying structure within the training data. One
example is identifying sub-groups or clusters that exhibit similar features or behaviour,
although unsupervised learning includes broader applications than just clustering.

To illustrate, referring back to the Imagenet database, if the labels describing the
images are ignored, then grouping the images into separate clusters containing similar
features is an unsupervised learning problem. You’d like to allocate images of birds

3. [Link] 4. The field of artificial intelligence research was founded as an academic discipline in 1956. The earliest research into
thinking machines was inspired by a confluence of ideas that became prevalent in the late 1930s, 1940s, and early 1950s. Research in neurology had shown that the brain
was an electrical network of neurons that fired in all-or-nothing pulses. Alan Turing’s theory of computation showed that any form of computation could be described digitally.
The close relationship between these ideas suggested that it might be possible to construct an electronic brain. 5. See [Link]

An Introduction to Machine Learning |3

 into the same cluster, and images of fish into another, but without the labels describing
the image contents you can’t explicitly assess whether an image is classified correctly
or incorrectly, and consequently you can’t guide, or supervise, the learning process to
do well. The task here becomes looking for common features within the images and
clustering according to these.

Reinforcement Learning is a special type of ML where an agent explores an

environment sequentially by taking actions that generate rewards. In many cases
the reward associated with a particular action may be unclear, and all we can say is
that a good or bad outcome was later obtained. Good outcomes generate positive
rewards, and bad outcomes negative rewards (punishments). The idea is to maximise
long-run total reward by combining exploration of the environment with exploitation of
knowledge about the observed rewards.

It’s worth noting that ML systems are not necessarily bound to just one of these fields.
In particular, the combination of deep learning and reinforcement learning in Deep
Reinforcement Learning has produced some high-profile successes, a recent example
being the AlphaGo engine which beat the world Go champion Lee Sedol. 6

Figure 2: Illustration of a Deep Neural Network Structure for Image/Object Recognition

For illustrative purposes. Modern Deep Learning systems for computer vision may have 20 or more layers.
Source: [Link]

There is this whole focus on ‘big data’. Why now (apart from the fact that
there is a lot of available data now and storage capacity has increased
exponentially)?
What do we exactly mean when we say big data?

Unfortunately there is no widely accepted definition, but in our view, big data is not
just ‘having a lot of data’. It’s more about having data from multiple sources, of various
types, and arising at different frequencies, e.g. information from financial markets,
national statistics and news, in numerical and text formats, obtained in real-time, daily
and monthly.

The more data/variables in any equation, the greater the chance of

overfitting the conclusions?
Yes, it is important to contrast the unknowns within the model, which are sometimes
called parameters, from the training data; in fact, it is useful to think of the training
data as ‘the knowns outside the model’. Fitting any ML model involves calibrating the
unknowns within the model using the information conveyed by the knowns outside the
model. 7

6. See [Link]

An Introduction to Machine Learning |4

 When a model with few parameters is fitted to a set of training data, then the amount of
information per parameter is large compared to a model with many parameters applied
to that same data. This is why simple models with few parameters can be reliably
calibrated more easily than ML models which may have thousands or even millions of
parameters. To address this issue, special techniques have been developed and are
now in common use to assist fitting ML models. 8

How do AI researchers prioritise the data?

This very much depends on the nature of the AI research: methodology breakthroughs
typically involve demonstrating best-against-peers performance on one or more
benchmark datasets. 9 As algorithms obtain ever better performance on these fixed
benchmark datasets, it is legitimate to ask how effectively they will perform in real-
world data applications. If they don’t generalise well outside their training data, this is
another example of over-fitting. In contrast, applied research often starts with a data
problem, and ideally an open mind about what tools to employ to solve it. There is no
point in using a complicated ML model if what it discovers could just as effectively be
captured using a linear regression.

The lesson is always to fit a simple model first, and then only adopt a more
complicated ML model if the extra predictive accuracy (value) it provides is worth it.

‘‘
Give me the simplest model that does the job every time.

How do researchers deal with the fact that big data may contain a lot of
Big data is not just fake data?
‘having a lot of data’. By ‘fake’ data, I assume you mean ‘data created with the deliberate intention of
misinforming’, as opposed to statistically ‘noisy’ datasets which may contain errors,
It’s more about missing values or other corruptions.
having data from For ‘noisy’ data, a suite of modelling techniques that goes by the name Bayesian
multiple sources, of Machine Learning is particularly robust at dealing with the statistical uncertainty
implicit with such noise. Indeed, this is one of the areas where we have enjoyed both
various types, and collaborations with academics at the Oxford-Man Institute and applications within
arising at different our systematic trading. Systematic fund managers like ourselves have been dealing
with noisy data for decades, so in some sense this can be thought of as business-
frequencies. ’’ as-usual but using the latest cutting-edge tools. Other branches of ML do not
naturally take account of such statistical noise, and in their basic form may fail to give
appropriate results when exposed to noisy data. Such models are described as brittle
rather than robust. This is a criticism often levelled against Deep Learning, however
recent methodological breakthroughs in Bayesian Deep Learning have led to new ML
techniques which at least partially address such issues.

Back to ‘fake’ data. This is not so relevant for market quantities such as price or
volume, as there are mechanisms in place to ensure such data accurately reflect
reality. It becomes more of an issue for text based data such as news or commentary,
but again most financial news reporting is of a high standard. It is also the case that
opinions can be wrong without being fake. It’s more of a problem in unregulated data
sources such as social media, but most institutional level investment and trading is not
driven by these anyway.

7. As an illustrative example, the same is true for simpler statistical models such as linear regression. The unknowns within the model are the intercept and slope parameters.
The knowns outside the model are the observed data, which are known in the sense that they are given, and do not change. 8. Examples include techniques such as Dropout
and Early Stopping, both of which are used to avoid overfitting in Deep Learning applications. 9. For example, Imagenet.

An Introduction to Machine Learning |5

 Figure 3: Noisy Data

Source: MNIST, Man AHL. For illustrative purposes.

The white characters on black background in the left-hand panel show handwritten digits from the MNIST database, which is a
standard benchmark dataset used in image analysis. Although the writing styles are different from character to character, there
is no ambiguity about the data (white) and background (black): the data are not statistically noisy, and the challenge is one of
interpreting (sometimes sloppy) handwriting. In contrast, the data in the right-hand panel are statistically noisy: the signal is barely
discernible against the background noise.

How do researchers deal with biases in big data?

‘Bias’ in data is an issue, and distinct from ‘fake’ or ‘noisy’ data. We all know the
story of the AI-based recruiting tool that exhibited a strong gender preference in the
candidates it put forward for interview because it had been trained on data with a

‘‘
gender bias. This deeply problematic outcome reflects an obvious, but important, truth:
these algorithms learn whatever pattern is in the data they are trained on regardless of
whether that pattern is what you want them to learn. Indeed removing bias in training
data and developing techniques for steering ML algorithms to learn some things but
‘Bias’ in data is an ignore others (e.g. things you already know, or that stocks tend to increase in price
issue, and distinct over time) is a key task in the applied research the ML team at our firm undertakes.

from ‘fake’ or ‘noisy’ How do researchers deal with non-stationarity (big data not being stable
data. ’’ over time)?
This is a pretty universal problem in any quantitative financial modelling so is felt
more widely than just in applications of ML. To calibrate any model with parameters
requires data, and the more data you have, the more precisely you can estimate the
parameters. Precision in estimated parameters is good to have, so this suggests you
should use lots of data. However, using more data typically means using data from
increasingly historical periods, but that is at the risk that these data may not reflect the
current world. To avoid that risk you should therefore use only the most recent data;
in other words, use few data. Unfortunately, these considerations pull you in opposite
directions; it’s Catch-22. In practice, we tilt towards using as much data as we can
and apply a penalty that discounts the impact of historical data compared to recent
information.

Figure 4: Non-Stationarity Data

Source: MNIST, Man AHL. For illustrative purposes.

Although the handwriting in the top-panel varies from character to character, all contributors adhere to the usual orientation
convention for the character ‘3’. In financial data, there may be no such conventions, and relationships may change through time
e.g. the correlation between bond and stock price movements has been both consistently positive and consistently negative over
different historical periods.

An Introduction to Machine Learning |6

‘‘
Algorithms becoming
aware and ‘taking
One of the common fears about machines (and ML perhaps) is about
algorithms working things out for themselves and becoming aware. Alan
Turing10 once famously remarked “Machines take me by surprise with great
frequency”, which suggests even in his time algorithms had some ability to
create solutions (or algorithms) not designed by their creator. How far do
over’ is definitely in you think we are from ‘aware’ machines?
I have been regularly surprised by algorithms since the days of my PhD deep in the last
the domain of science century! But… that has never meant they’re about to take over the world!
fiction rather than Fitting a model typically relies on some optimisation algorithm. This seeks to find a set
science fact! ’’ of parameters that makes some goodness-of-fit criterion as large (or small) as it can.
Sometimes, the optimisation algorithm zooms in on parameters which are useless but
happen to yield particularly good values of this criterion. It boils down to the computer
doing what you asked it to rather than what you wanted it to do, an annoying type of
user error that I seem to repeat regularly.

Algorithms becoming aware and ‘taking over’ is definitely in the domain of science
fiction rather than science fact! That does not mean algorithms can’t or won’t exhibit
destructive behaviour; however if they do, then it won’t be because they’ve gained
consciousness, but more likely that they’ve stumbled on some corner-case solution of
an ill-specified optimisation criterion.

Which areas of investment management have the most potential to

be affected by ML? For example, data analysis, stock selection, asset
allocation, risk premia, electronic trading, hedge funds or other?
For ML to have an impact, you need a few things: ample amounts of representative
data, and effects that are not easily described using simpler models. Without large
amounts of data, you cannot precisely calibrate an ML model; you need that data to
be representative so that the model learns effects that are still current, and you are
just undertaking needless and pointless complications if you use a ML model when a
simpler model will do. For numerical data this points towards the non-linear effects
which are most prevalent at daily, intra-day and faster speeds, and where there is a
relative abundance of data compared to slower strategies. Developing trade execution
and smart order-routing algorithms is another ideal domain for the use of ML, and is an
active area of research within our firm.

Another area where ML is having significant impact is in exploiting text-based data,

using so called Natural Language Processing (‘NLP’). Although our firm and other
systematic traders have been around for several decades, it is only relatively recently
that such data sources have been systematically harvested and deployed within live
trading.

Where do you see the main risks and opportunities for institutional
investors?
The investment opportunities offered by ML strategies can be summarised in one word:
diversification. As with the rest of quantitative investment, there are many more words
for the risks.

Like anyone considering investing in a quantitative strategy, investors should have

a good understanding of the range of market-data regimes used to build and test
the model. Are the returns offered by the ML model sufficiently diversifying to their
existing portfolio, or can they be adequately captured by a simpler technique? What
can be expected when markets become strained, is there any reason to believe the
diversification (assuming it exists) will persist? Lots of firms are exploring ML, so is
the risk of crowding higher or lower for ML models than for mainstream quantitative
strategies? If they have higher turnover, then what capacity do such strategies have?
Should I expect them to have shorter half-lives? How much do transaction costs have
to increase in order to cancel-out the alpha? Does the strategy make profits smoothly
through time or in bursts? Etc.

10. Alan Turing (1912 – 1954) was an English mathematician, computer scientist, logician, cryptanalyst, philosopher and theoretical biologist. In 1941, Turing and his fellow
cryptanalysts set up a system for decrypting German Enigma signals. Turing is widely considered to be the father of theoretical computer science and artificial intelligence.
“Computing Machinery and Intelligence” published in 1950 is considered the seminal work on the topic of artificial intelligence.

An Introduction to Machine Learning |7

‘‘
The investment
opportunities offered
How high do you rate the chance of large corporations with extremely deep
pockets, like Alphabet, etc, getting involved in developing ML applications
for investment purposes and competing with other investors?11
It would not surprise me. In fact, it is somewhat of a surprise that it has not happened
already!
by ML strategies
A partial explanation might be the large proportion of ML researchers who want to
can be summarised work on applications involving computer vision, self-driving cars, consumer apps and
seemingly anything other than finance.
in one word:
diversification. ’’ In one sense, it would be great to see the coupling of ML and quantitative finance
become more mainstream. This is something Man Group has been promoting since
2007 through our co-creation of the Oxford-Man Institute of Quantitative Finance with
the University of Oxford, and our ongoing financial support of the OMI’s research.

Sure, there would be more competition, but there would also be a lot more research
getting done and a lot more people doing it. The trick would be to remain at the
forefront of that increased research activity, something we’ve been good at so far.

I wanted to draw your attention to a Man AHL paper written in Dec 2016
called ‘Man vs. Machine: Comparing Discretionary and Systematic Hedge
Fund Performance’ which suggests discretionary macro managers
underperform systematic macro managers, even after adjusting for
volatility and factor exposures over the measured time period. How do you
think this debate will shift with the advent of ML?
From my experience, ML strategies have the most to offer towards the faster end of the
spectrum of strategies deployed by most systematic macro managers. Furthermore,
not all systematic macro managers will make use of such strategies.

So the impact on performance at the group-wide level of systematic macro managers is

likely to be modest, at most.

Do you have any thoughts on the increased competition among

quantitative managers?
Increased competition is likely to mean that only managers offering genuinely
differentiated alpha (arising from ML or other novel sources) will be able to resist fee
erosion. This is clearly a much wider issue than just relating to ML.

What in your opinion distinguishes a good from a mediocre quant

manager?
I have quite a few criteria!

ƒ ƒ An independent risk management team that monitors for the build-up of inadvertent
portfolio exposures;

ƒ ƒ A wide range of diversifying strategies so that undue reliance is not placed on any
one strategy or concentrated group of strategies;

ƒ ƒ A joined-up understanding of strategy design, portfolio construction, trade

execution and risk;

ƒ ƒ A long track record of trading through a wide range of market environments;

ƒ ƒ A stable, international, multi-disciplined and diverse team with low turnover that
contains both new recruits and old-timers (like me!);

ƒ ƒ State-of-the art computing hardware and software;

ƒ ƒ Active engagement with the outside world e.g. through academic collaborations and
publications;

ƒ ƒ Contributing to rather than just taking from the open-source community;

ƒ ƒ An open culture where staff collaborate rather than operate in silos;

ƒ ƒ A test-trading program where the latest research ideas can be verified in live trading
without risking client capital;

11. [Link] [Link]

An Introduction to Machine Learning |8

And finally, an honest research culture where nobody seeks to hide research that does
not work, or to pretend it does!

How do you decide when a model no longer works?

It’s rare in our style of trading for a model to suddenly stop working, and many models
are kept fresh through periodic refits. Sometimes the components of a model are
superseded by new models, and in that case they get turned-off.

More generally the amount of trading capital a model obtains in the portfolio will be
driven by its long-term risk-adjusted return and correlation with other models. This
means that a model which consistently underperforms or fails to diversify will naturally
receive a diminishing allocation as time progresses, although obviously this de-
allocation occurs with some lag.

If the structural assumptions underpinning a model fundamentally change

(e.g. a currency peg is implemented or relaxed) then turning-off the model in that
market is merited.

What do you think is the best investment time horizon to apply ML?
How important is real-time data?
Within our suite of trading models, ML has the highest representation at the faster end,
with holding periods extending from intra-day out to multiple days.

Faster signals than that certainly exhibit greater non-linear structure, however such
effects are hard to capture as alpha in the client-scale funds typical of large systematic
managers like us.

In a nutshell, they are just too fast. However, when applied in trade execution, such
effects may offer significant advantage in reducing transaction costs, e.g. enabling
orders to be front- or back-loaded depending on the short-term predictability of the
limit-order book. Real-time data is essential for that.

Are there any other important developments in the quantitative space

worth noting?
There is a good deal of research effort being deployed on modelling text and other
alternative data sources, and the range of instruments being traded continues to
extend. These are just the latest pieces in the industry’s ongoing hunt for diversification
through new models, new markets and new trading horizons. ML and big data fit
somewhere as pieces in that hunt.

Can you comment on some of the other interesting areas apart from ML
that the Man-Oxford Institute is currently working on?12
Within the University of Oxford, the Engineering Science Department’s hub for ML
houses both the OMI and the broader Machine Learning Research Group (‘MLRG’).
Research activities span a diverse range of topics with applications ranging from
astronomy to zoology, with examples including detecting disease-bearing mosquitoes,
identifying exoplanets from data gathered using NASA’s Kepler space telescope,
systems for remote fault detection and monitoring, and making energy networks and
storage more efficient.

Research in the MLRG also addresses the broader societal consequences of ML

and robotics, e.g. their impact on employment. Alongside the OMI’s strong research
focus on ML and data-centric methods for finance, its members, associate members
and graduate students undertake a broad range of interdisciplinary and collaborative
projects, e.g. assessing the impact of regulation – and breaches of regulation – on
markets, and investigating the relationship between future earnings and the language
used in corporate announcements.

On a side note, do you think there is a premium for illiquidity?

My experience would suggest there is, however it is hard to disentangle this from the
inverse premium associated with a market’s ease of access. In particular, I have seen
the same algorithms trade in easily accessed liquid markets and hard-to-access illiquid
markets and do much better in the latter. But I should add that this has been against a

An Introduction to Machine Learning |9

‘‘
Investing: an art,
science or skill?
backdrop of non-standard central bank, regulator and government measures 13 , which
typically have more impacted the liquid easily accessed markets.

Will that continue? Who knows.

Also, if you look across the industry, the half-life of trading strategies tends to be
monotonic with their time horizons. Slower strategies typically last longer, but with
All three. But it’s rare lower Sharpe ratios, than higher frequency strategies.
to find all these in
As a scientist, do you have any thoughts on the premium for sustainability?
the same person at
My colleagues in Man Numeric have spent almost two years unpacking Environmental,
the same time, which Social and Governance (‘ESG’) data, conditioning for statistical biases and removing
exposures to other factors, and thereby have obtained something meaningful and
is why we believe in
orthogonal. This is the closest thing I have seen to an ESG or sustainability factor. Of
teams. ’’ course, it is quite possible that as more people focus on ESG and sustainability that a
premium may emerge – it is a changing environment where ESG and non-ESG activities
could become advantaged or disadvantaged by policy.

How do you see the investment industry evolving over the coming decade?
At the industry level, I expect to see more consolidation as both fee erosion and the
costs of doing innovative state-of-the-art research take effect.

Closer to home, some currently ‘cutting-edge’ alphas (including some ML models) will
transition into alternative betas, whilst a new cohort of data science researchers will
seek-out new alphas to replace them. Discretionary managers will make extensive use
of data dashboards that deliver assimilated big data views.
Run-of-the-mill computer hardware (and whatever the smartphone has become in a
decade’s time) will make today’s state-of-the-art systems look just as ridiculous as
those from 2009 do today.

Who will have the edge in leading the AI research of the future? Apart
from yourself, are there certain leading academics, corporations or even
countries that you could identify?
Internationally, North America and China have been the leading investors in AI and ML
research for some time, with Europe, Australasia and the rest of the world now trying to
compete, if somewhat belatedly.

I’d expect how this funding landscape evolves to be the deciding factor in the
shape of AI developments over the next decade. That said, the traditional model of
methodological AI research being undertaken in universities has changed significantly
over the last 10 years, with a lot more now originating in blue-sky company laboratories
and being openly published, with a corresponding drift of staff from universities to
these laboratories.

Without a strong source of people to replace these university researchers, the research
landscape could become fundamentally changed. To mitigate this, joint industry-
university collaborations such as the OMI may become more common, enabling
academics to operate effectively in both camps, rather than exclusively in one or the
other.

Final question: investing: art, science or skill?

All three. But it’s rare to find all these in the same person at the same time, which is
why we believe in teams.

12. [Link] 13. In response to the Global Financial Crisis.

An Introduction to Machine Learning | 10

Authors

Dr Anthony Ledford
Chief Scientist at Man AHL
Dr Anthony Ledford is Man AHL’s Chief Scientist and Academic Liaison. Dr Ledford is
based in the Man Research Laboratory (Oxford) and has overall
responsibility for Man AHL’s strategic research undertaken
there. Prior to joining Man AHL in 2001, he lectured in Statistics
at the University of Surrey. Dr Ledford read Mathematics at
Cambridge University, holds a PhD from Lancaster University in
the development and application of multivariate extreme value methods and is a former
winner of the Royal Statistical Society’s Research Prize.

An Introduction to Machine Learning | 11

Important Information
This information is communicated and/or distributed by the relevant Man entity identified below (collectively the ‘Company’) subject to the following
conditions and restriction in their respective jurisdictions.
Opinions expressed are those of the author and may not be shared by all personnel of Man Group plc (‘Man’). These opinions are subject to change
without notice, are for information purposes only and do not constitute an offer or invitation to make an investment in any financial instrument or
in any product to which the Company and/or its affiliates provides investment advisory or any other financial services. Any organisations, financial
instrument or products described in this material are mentioned for reference purposes only which should not be considered a recommendation
for their purchase or sale. Neither the Company nor the authors shall be liable to any person for any action taken on the basis of the information
provided. Some statements contained in this material concerning goals, strategies, outlook or other non-historical matters may be forward-looking
statements and are based on current indicators and expectations. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they
are made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are
subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the statements. The Company and/or its
affiliates may or may not have a position in any financial instrument mentioned and may or may not be actively trading in any such securities. This
material is proprietary information of the Company and its affiliates and may not be reproduced or otherwise disseminated in whole or in part without
prior written consent from the Company. The Company believes the content to be accurate. However accuracy is not warranted or guaranteed.
The Company does not assume any liability in the case of incorrectly reported or incomplete information. Unless stated otherwise all information is
provided by the Company. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Unless stated otherwise this information is communicated by the relevant entity listed below.
Australia: To the extent this material is distributed in Australia it is communicated by Man Investments Australia Limited ABN 47 002 747 480 AFSL
240581, which is regulated by the Australian Securities & Investments Commission (ASIC). This information has been prepared without taking into
account anyone’s objectives, financial situation or needs.
Austria/Germany/Liechtenstein: To the extent this material is distributed in Austria, Germany and/or Liechtenstein it is communicated by Man
(Europe) AG, which is authorised and regulated by the Liechtenstein Financial Market Authority (FMA). Man (Europe) AG is registered in the
Principality of Liechtenstein no. FL-0002.420.371-2. Man (Europe) AG is an associated participant in the investor compensation scheme, which
is operated by the Deposit Guarantee and Investor Compensation Foundation PCC (FL-0002.039.614-1) and corresponds with EU law. Further
information is available on the Foundation’s website under [Link]. This material is of a promotional nature.
European Economic Area: Unless indicated otherwise this material is communicated in the European Economic Area by Man Asset Management
(Ireland) Limited (‘MAMIL’) which is registered in Ireland under company number 250493 and has its registered office at 70 Sir John Rogerson’s
Quay, Grand Canal Dock, Dublin 2, Ireland. MAMIL is authorised and regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland under number C22513.
Hong Kong: To the extent this material is distributed in Hong Kong, this material is communicated by Man Investments (Hong Kong) Limited and
has not been reviewed by the Securities and Futures Commission in Hong Kong. This material can only be communicated to intermediaries, and
professional clients who are within one of the professional investor exemptions contained in the Securities and Futures Ordinance and must not be
relied upon by any other person(s).
Switzerland: To the extent this material is distributed in Switzerland, this material is communicated by Man Investments AG, which is regulated by
the Swiss Financial Market Authority FINMA.
United Kingdom: Unless indicated otherwise this material is communicated in the United Kingdom by Man Solutions Limited (‘MSL’) which is an
investment company as defined in section 833 of the Companies Act 2006. MSL is registered in England and Wales under number 3385362 and has
its registered office at Riverbank House, 2 Swan Lane, London, EC4R 3AD, United Kingdom. MSL is authorised and regulated by the UK Financial
Conduct Authority (the ‘FCA’) under number 185637.
United States: To the extent this material is distributed in the United States, it is communicated and distributed by Man Investments, Inc.
(‘Man Investments’). Man Investments is registered as a broker-dealer with the SEC and is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority
(‘FINRA’). Man Investments is also a member of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (‘SIPC’). Man Investments is a wholly owned
subsidiary of Man Group plc. The registration and memberships described above in no way imply a certain level of skill or expertise or that the SEC,
FINRA or the SIPC have endorsed Man Investments. Man Investments, 452 Fifth Avenue, 27th fl., New York, NY 10018.
This material is proprietary information and may not be reproduced or otherwise disseminated in whole or in part without prior written consent. Any
data services and information available from public sources used in the creation of this material are believed to be reliable. However accuracy is not
warranted or guaranteed. © Man 2019.
2019/1659958/S/US/GL/I/A

An Introduction to Machine Learning | 12