Global Economic Conditions
Global Economic Conditions
for textiles.
The textile and ready-made garment (RMG) sector is the lifeblood of Bangladesh’s economy. As one
of the world's largest garment exporters, Bangladesh has leveraged its low labor costs and export-
oriented production capacity to position itself as a critical supplier to international fashion brands.
However, this success has created a double-edged sword: while global demand fuels the country’s
economic engine, it also exposes Bangladesh to significant risks associated with global economic
fluctuations. Global economic conditions play a critical role in shaping the fortunes of Bangladesh’s
textile and garment sector, which is heavily reliant on exports to developed markets such as the
United States, the European Union, and Canada. A downturn in global economic conditions can
result in a steep decline in the security and stability of the country’s textile sector.
When these markets face economic turbulence—such as recessions, inflation, rising interest rates,
or supply chain disruptions—consumer behavior shifts. Apparel is considered a discretionary good,
meaning consumers often reduce their clothing expenditures in difficult financial times. As a result,
retail giants reduce inventories and scale back orders, causing a ripple effect that strikes at the core
of Bangladesh’s garment industry.
The COVID-19 pandemic of 2020 is perhaps the most recent and illustrative example of how global
economic shocks affect Bangladesh’s garment sector. As countries imposed lockdowns and
consumer demand plummeted, international retailers canceled or suspended billions of dollars in
orders from Bangladeshi factories. According to a report from the Center for Global Workers' Rights
(2020), over $3 billion worth of garment orders were either cancelled or postponed. Many factories
were forced to shut down temporarily or operate at limited capacity, resulting in massive layoffs and
wage losses for workers.
This disruption showcased the fragility of a supply chain that hinges so heavily on external consumer
behavior. It also highlighted the limited bargaining power of Bangladeshi suppliers in their
relationships with large global brands. Unlike diversified economies, Bangladesh has few alternative
industries that can absorb such shocks.
Inflation and Cost-of-Living Crises in Importing Countries
The post-pandemic recovery period saw another wave of challenges due to high inflation in the
West. Driven by supply chain constraints, energy crises, and geopolitical instability (including the
Russia-Ukraine war), inflation rates soared across the United States and the European Union.
Consumers, facing higher prices on essentials such as food and fuel, began cutting back on non-
essential purchases like fashion apparel. Retailers responded by reducing new stock procurement,
delaying orders, and demanding price cuts—once again putting Bangladeshi exporters in a
vulnerable position.
Bangladeshi factories, operating on thin margins, struggle to meet demands for lower prices amid
rising operational costs. Cotton prices, freight rates, and utility costs have all risen since 2021,
squeezing profitability. The industry has limited capacity to absorb these shocks without
compromising on worker welfare or production quality, thereby threatening long-term
competitiveness.
Global economic instability also affects exchange rates, which can be a double-edged sword for
Bangladesh. A depreciation of the Bangladeshi Taka (BDT) may make exports cheaper and thus more
attractive to foreign buyers. However, the textile industry is heavily dependent on imported raw
materials such as cotton, dyes, and chemicals. As the BDT weakens, the cost of importing these
essential inputs rises, offsetting any benefits gained from a competitive exchange rate. This makes it
difficult for exporters to price their products attractively while maintaining profit margins.
Moreover, most international transactions are conducted in US dollars or Euros, making the industry
highly sensitive to dollar fluctuations. If the dollar strengthens significantly, buyers may look to
alternative sourcing markets where currency parity offers more favorable terms.
Beyond purely economic factors, geopolitical events such as trade wars, regional conflicts, and
strategic alliances can reshape global supply chains. For example, the U.S.-China trade war led many
brands to shift production away from China. Initially, this seemed like a boon for Bangladesh, as
buyers looked for alternative sourcing hubs. However, Vietnam, India, and even Ethiopia began
competing for the same orders, offering competitive pricing and more advanced infrastructure.
Bangladesh, though cost-effective, has struggled with logistical inefficiencies, bureaucratic hurdles,
and infrastructure bottlenecks. Ports remain congested, electricity supply is inconsistent, and
compliance standards sometimes fall short of evolving global norms. In an environment where
buyers are seeking greater agility, Bangladesh’s structural weaknesses become liabilities. If economic
tensions continue to force global supply chains to pivot quickly, countries with more resilient
logistics and diversified industries may outcompete Bangladesh.
Long-Term Security Risks
The long-term security of Bangladesh’s textile sector is thus inextricably linked to the health of the
global economy. Any sustained downturn in developed markets could trigger cascading effects
throughout the RMG value chain in Bangladesh. Worker unrest due to delayed wages, factory
closures due to unsustainable operations, and loss of buyer confidence due to missed deadlines or
quality lapses are all real threats. In addition, Bangladesh’s limited diversification into other high-
value sectors means that it lacks the economic cushion that could help soften such blows.
Moreover, as environmental and social governance (ESG) standards become central to international
trade and investment decisions, Bangladesh must invest in sustainable production practices to stay
competitive. However, such transitions require capital and expertise, which are harder to mobilize
during global downturns. This creates a cycle of dependency and vulnerability.
To enhance the resilience of its textile industry, Bangladesh must adopt a multi-pronged approach.
First, it should diversify its export markets to reduce overreliance on the U.S. and EU. Exploring
markets in East Asia, Latin America, and Africa could open new avenues. Second, investment in
logistics infrastructure—such as modernizing port facilities and improving inland transportation—will
help reduce lead times and improve reliability.
Third, the government and private sector should collaborate to upskill workers and adopt new
technologies, particularly in automation and sustainability. This would increase productivity and
ensure compliance with emerging environmental standards. Finally, financial instruments like export
credit insurance and currency hedging should be more widely adopted to manage global financial
risks.
Conclusion
Bangladesh’s textile industry stands at a crossroads. While it has achieved remarkable success in
becoming a global garment supplier, its heavy reliance on foreign consumer markets makes it
acutely vulnerable to global economic downturns. Events like the COVID-19 pandemic, inflation in
importing countries, and exchange rate volatility have exposed the structural weaknesses of the
sector. If global economic conditions continue to fluctuate unpredictably, the security of
Bangladesh’s textile industry will remain precarious unless strategic reforms are implemented.
Diversification, technological modernization, infrastructure development, and financial risk
management must become national priorities if Bangladesh is to safeguard its economic lifeline from
the storms of the global economy.