0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views4 pages

5 CO COPOMapping EvaluationCriteria

The document outlines the course outcomes and mapping for the B.Tech. D1P subject at Poornima College of Engineering, detailing the skills students are expected to acquire in digital image processing. It includes a justification for the mapping of course outcomes to program outcomes and program specific outcomes, as well as rules for attainment levels and assessment activities. Additionally, it specifies the assessment tools and weightage for evaluating student performance in relation to the course outcomes.

Uploaded by

Su Kosh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views4 pages

5 CO COPOMapping EvaluationCriteria

The document outlines the course outcomes and mapping for the B.Tech. D1P subject at Poornima College of Engineering, detailing the skills students are expected to acquire in digital image processing. It includes a justification for the mapping of course outcomes to program outcomes and program specific outcomes, as well as rules for attainment levels and assessment activities. Additionally, it specifies the assessment tools and weightage for evaluating student performance in relation to the course outcomes.

Uploaded by

Su Kosh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

POORNIMA COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, JAIPUR

DEPARTMENT OF ADVANCE COMPUTING


Campus: Poornima College of Engineering Year/Section: 3rd Date: 2 Jan 2025
Course: B.Tech. Semester/ Branch – 6Cy, AI
Name of Faculty: Dr Rajesh Kumar Bathija Name of Subject :D1P Code: 6CS3-01
COURSE OUTCOME:

6CS3-01.1 (CO1)
To identify the elements of image and basic steps of digital Image Processing. .

6CS3-01.2(CO2):
To Apply the diffrent function types in spatial and frequency domain. .

6CS3-01.3(CO3):
To use different tecniques for image enhancement and image restoration.

6CS3-01.4(CO4):
To construct enhance image using the technique of compression and segmentation
techniques.

CO-PO-PSO Mapping: Mapping Levels: 1- Low, 2- Moderate, 3-Strong

CO PO PSO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2 PSO3

CO1 2 2

CO2 2 2

CO3 2 2

CO4 2 2

CO-PO MAPPING JUSTIFICATION

Since Mathematics and Science knowledge is required in Sampling and Quantization hence
CO1 PO2 2
CO1 is median mapped to PO2.

Since Mathematics and Science knowledge is required histogram calculation and Fourier
CO2 PO1 2
transform hence CO2 is strongly mapped to PO1.

6CS3-01 Since Filters and Noise filters algorithms help to identify, formulate and analysis engineering
CO3 PO3 2
hence CO3 and PO3 are strongly mapped.

Real world problem that are complex in nature will be analyzed and designed using various
CO4 PO2 2
compression methods hence CO4 is strongly mapped with PO2.

CO-PSO MAPPING JUSTIFICATION


PSO Image acquisition and steps in image processing require knowledge so that solutions can be
CO1 2
1 provided for bio medical imaging hence CO1 is strongly mapped to PSO1

PSO Students will apply histogram equalization process on image for enhancement hence
CO2 2
1 mapping is medium mapped.

6CS3-01 PSO Design and development of images without filtering and restoration is not possible hence it
CO3 2
1 is medium mapped.

PSO
CO4 2 Compression Method has designed for the
1
POORNIMA COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, JAIPUR
DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER ENGINEERING
Campus: Poornima College of Engineering Year/Section: 3rd Date: 2 Feb 2024
Course: B.Tech. Semester/ Section – 6A
Name of Faculty: Sonam Gour Name of Subject :D1P Code: 6CS3-01

RULES FOR CO/LO ATTAINMENT LEVELS: (TARGETS)

Course Category Level 3 Level 2 Level 1


A 60 % of students 50-60 % of students 40-50 % of students
getting > 60% marks getting > 60% marks getting > 60% marks

END TERM RTU COMPONENT: CO ATTAINMENT LEVELS

Course Category Level 3 Level 2 Level 1


A 50 % of students 40-50 % of students 30-40 % of students
getting > 60% marks getting > 60% marks getting > 60% marks

For the specific CO/LO attainment levels of your respective course please use the above tables as reference
according your subject difficulty level and prepare following table.

S. Attainment Attainment Attainment


Course Type
No. Level=1 Level=2 Level=3

Theory Courses 40-50 % of 50-60 % of students 60 % of students


1 students getting > getting > 60% getting > 60%
Mid Semester Exams 60% marks marks marks
Theory Courses 30-40 % of 40-50 % of 50 % of students
2 students getting > students getting > getting > 60%
University Exam 60% marks 60% marks marks

50-60 % of students
40-50 % of 60 % of students
getting > 60%
6 Assignments/Unit Test students getting > getting > 60%
marks
60% marks marks
CO WISE ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES (AS MENTIONED IN SESSION PLAN)
Activities

CO Pre Post Quiz Quiz Pre Post Assig Assig Assign Semin Works Traini Discussi Mid 1 Mid Ind.
Mid Mid I 1 2 Mid II Mid II nmen nment ment 3 ar hop ng on 2 visit
I Test Test Test t 1 2
Test

CO1 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

CO2 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

CO3 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

CO4 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

CO-PO/PSO MAPPING AND TARGETS

CO PO Avg. PSO

PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 CO PSO1 PSO2 PSO3
Targe
ts

CO1 2 2 2

CO2 2 2 2

CO3 2 2 2

CO4 2 2 2

ACTIVITY WISE ASSESSMENT TOOLS

Sr. No. Activity Assessment Tools Weightage Recommendation


Method
Marks

1. Mid Term 1 Direct Marks 60 For CO1,2,3,4


2. Pre and Post Mid Term Direct Marks 20 For CO1,2,3,4
3. Mid
Test Term 2 Direct Marks 60 For CO1,2,3,4
4. QUIZ Direct Marks 20 For CO1,2,3,4
5. Assignment 1 Direct Marks 20 For CO1,2,3,4,
Note that for every rubrics you need to decide assessment criteria,
range of marks or weightage – above values are indicative

You might also like